Defamation Act 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Defamation Act 2013 Keeping out of serious harm’s way: Court of Appeal clarifies test under s1(1) Defamation Act 2013 September 20, 2017 Summary Authors/Presenters The much anticipated appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd has been handed down by the Court of Appeal. Claimant individuals will be encouraged by the Court’s clarification that the serious harm test under the Graham Shear Defamation Act does not require a radical departure from Partner and Co-Global the pre-Defamation Act position, which is likely to save Practice Group Leader - Business and Commercial parties time and cost at preliminary stages of proceedings. Disputes However, the position is not so clear for corporates. London [email protected] Following various high profile controversies in the law of defamation, including the outcry over ‘libel forum shopping’ and Parliamentary scrutiny of corporates pursuing actionable but sometimes negligible libels to restrict publication of negative coverage about them, Sarah McAtominey Parliament amended the law of defamation by the Partner Defamation Act 2013 (the “2013 Act”). London [email protected] One of the main changes enacted by the 2013 Act, which came into force on 1 January 2014, was the introduction of a new threshold of seriousness for defamation claims to be actionable. This threshold was set out in section 1, which Page 1 of 6 provides as follows: "(1) A statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the reputation of the claimant. Andrew Street Senior Associate (2) For the purposes of this section, harm to the London reputation of a body that trades for profit is not "serious [email protected] harm" unless it has caused or is likely to cause the body serious financial loss." The serious harm threshold has already been considered by the High Court, not least in the high profile libel case brought by Jack Monroe against Katie Hopkins for certain defamatory statements made on Twitter. However, the Lachaux case, whose decision has been eagerly awaited by both practitioners and potential parties to defamation claims alike, is the first time the ‘serious harm’ test (in particular under s1(1)) has been considered by the appellate courts. Facts of the case The case concerned five articles that were published by the Independent, the i, the Evening Standard and the Huffington Post about Mr Lachaux’s private life. The articles were published in early 2014 and made various allegations about Mr Lachaux’s conduct in relation to his divorce from his wife. Various of these allegations involved serious criminal conduct purportedly committed by Mr Lachaux. The Huffington Post took the post-publication steps of removing the article and publishing an apology several months later following a complaint by Mr Lachaux. First instance decision Following a first instance trial of preliminary issues in the High Court, Mr Justice Warby held that Mr Lachaux was required under s1(1) of the 2013 Act to prove that, on the balance of probabilities, the statements published had caused or were likely to cause serious harm. Warby J held that four of the five articles published had caused serious harm, finding that one of the Huffington Post articles did not satisfy the statutory test as it had only made cursory reference to a previous defamatory article in the same title. Page 2 of 6 Warby J’s decision caused a significant reaction amongst defamation practitioners because it swept away the previous position (prior to the 2013 Act) that libel was actionable without evidence of actual harm being required. Whereas previously harm was presumed (and only the extent of harm required consideration), Warby J held that the inference would not necessarily be justifiable by reference to the evidence adduced on the issue, which would be required to prove on a balance of probabilities actual harm had occurred or would occur. There were two notable practical consequences to the first instance decision. First, that significant evidence would be required at an early stage of proceedings (as indeed was required in this case where Mr Lachaux provided oral evidence at a preliminary issues trial), potentially causing procedural headaches for parties. Second, that harm would have to be assessed at the date of issue of proceedings, which is likely to be inherently uncertain, rather than the point at which the statement is published due to the requirement to prove that harm has been caused or is likely to be caused. Accordingly, Warby J indicated in his judgment that, while the Huffington Post apology was not relevant to the issue of serious harm in this case at first instance, it could be the case that a prompt apology prior to proceedings being issued would be sufficient to prevent a statement from being actionable. Appeal judgment The Defendants appealed against Warby J’s judgment, including his finding that four of the five articles complained of passed the serious harm threshold. In response Mr Lachaux argued to the Court of Appeal that while the High Court’s decision was still correct on the facts (in finding that at least some of the offending articles were defamatory), Warby J had erred in his interpretation of the effect of s1(1) of the 2013 Act and that he could have reached a decision in favour of Mr Lachaux by a quicker route had he not done so. The Court of Appeal dismissed all of the grounds of appeal brought by the defendants. Lord Justice Davis (with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Lady Justice Sharp agreed) also stated that he also “accept[ed] the principal argument advanced by the claimant in the respondent’s notice” in relation to s1(1). Helpfully, Lord Justice Davis summarised the Court of Appeal’s position in relation to s1(1) at paragraph 92 of his judgment. That paragraph should be all practitioners’ first port of call for assessing whether a statement is likely to fulfil the s1(1) threshold, and is set out below: Page 3 of 6 (1) Section 1(1) of the 2013 Act has the effect of giving statutory status to Thornton, albeit also raising the threshold from one of substantiality to one of seriousness: no less, no more but equally no more, no less. Thornton has thus itself been superseded by statute. (2) The common law presumption as to damage in cases of libel, the common law principle that the cause of action accrues on the date of publication, the established position as to limitation and the common law objective single meaning rule are all unaffected by s.1 (1). (3) If there is an issue as to meaning (or any related issue as to reference) that can be resolved at a meaning hearing, applying the usual objective approach in the usual way. If there is a further issue as to serious harm, then there may be cases where such issue can also appropriately be dealt with at the meaning hearing. If the meaning so assessed is evaluated as seriously defamatory it will ordinarily then be proper to draw an inference of serious reputational harm. Once that threshold is reached further evidence will then be likely to be more relevant to quantum and any continuing dispute should ordinarily be left to trial. (4) Courts should ordinarily be slow to direct a preliminary issue, involving substantial evidence, on a dispute as to whether serious reputational harm has been caused or is likely to be caused by the published statement. (5) A defendant disputing the existence of serious harm may in an appropriate case, if the circumstances so warrant, issue a Part 24 summary judgment application or issue a Jameel application: the Jameel jurisdiction continuing to be available after the 2013 Act as before (albeit in reality likely only relatively rarely to be appropriately used). (6) All interlocutory process in such cases should be sought to be managed in a way that is proportionate and cost-effective and actively promotes the overriding objective. (7) Finally, it may be that in some respects the position with regard to bodies trading for profit, under s.1(2), will be different. I say nothing about that subsection which clearly is designed to operate in a way rather different from s.1(1). The BLP view Page 4 of 6 Permission has already been sought to appeal to the Supreme Court, so the story may not be over just yet. However, the Court of Appeal’s judgment will come as good news to individual claimants who, since the 2013 Act and prior to this judgment’s handing down, may have been put off making a defamation claim due to concerns over the serious harm threshold. The judgment clarifies that harm should be assessed as at the point of publication, rather than the more arbitrary date of issue of proceedings, and that serious harm to reputation can be inferred rather than requiring to be proven on a balance of probabilities. The ability to infer serious harm will enable defamation proceedings to be conducted in a more proportionate and efficient manner and the reference to publication date for the purposes of assessing harm gives claimants certainty and is consistent with other provisions of the 2013 Act. BLP welcomes both developments which have cut through the uncertainty caused by the first instance. It seems clear from Lord Justice Davis’ judgment, however, that corporate bodies will not be able to rely upon the clarification of serious harm in Lachaux. The Court of Appeal expressly indicated that s1(2) of the 2013 Act, which requires that serious financial loss should have been caused or will likely be caused for a statement relating to a corporate to be defamatory, is designed to operate in a different way to the basic test for serious harm.
Recommended publications
  • GCSE English Language Insert Unit 01
    5 6 There are no sources printed on this page There are no sources printed on this page GCSE ENGLISH/ENGLISH LANGUAGE F Foundation Tier Unit 1 Understanding and producing non-fiction texts Insert The three sources that follow are: Source 1: an online article called, ‘Teenager buys £600 worth of shopping for 4p and donates food to charity’ Source 2: ‘Hunger Hurts’, an extract from a blog by Jack Monroe Source 3: a charity leaflet from St Mungo’s Broadway. Open out this page to see Source 2 and Source 3 Please open the insert fully to see all three sources Copyright information For confidentiality purposes, from the November 2015 examination series, acknowledgements of third party copyright material will be published in a separate booklet rather than including them on the examination paper or support materials. This booklet is published after each examination series and is available for free download from www.aqa.org.uk after the live examination series. Permission to reproduce all copyright material has been applied for. In some cases, efforts to contact copyright-holders may have been unsuccessful and AQA will be happy to rectify any omissions of acknowledgements. If you have any queries please contact the Copyright Team, AQA, Stag Hill House, Guildford, GU2 7XJ. Copyright © 2015 AQA and its licensors. All rights reserved. LY/Nov15/ENG1F LY/Nov15/ENG1F LY/Nov15/E5 ENG1F 2 3 4 Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 JACK MONROE This is Harvey, with his Site Directory Search COOK, CAMPAIGNER, GUARDIAN RECIPE COLUMNIST, RED MAGAZINE’S WOMAN OF THE YEAR, AUTHOR OF ‘A GIRL CALLED South Wales Evening Post JACK’ & ‘A YEAR IN 120 RECIPES’, COOKS, WRITES, GROWS SOME STUFF, EATS, TWITTER: @MSJACKMONROE dog Kiya.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Essex Organic Gardeners
    SOUTH EAST ESSEX ORGANIC GARDENERS NEWSLETTER NO: 110 – JULY 2013 http://seeog.org.uk/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/Southendfoodgrowersandproducers https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn#!/groups/43705483846/ SEEOG was formed in 1994, to promote the principles of organic gardening by: • Composting organic waste • Protecting wildlife • Reducing pollution • Encouraging species diversity Membership is currently £8.00 per annum, £12.00 family. Is your local school a member of SEEOG? If not, we offer free membership on receipt of application form! Venue Cheryl Centre, Growing Together Community Gardens, 47 Fairfax Drive, Southend-on-Sea SS0 9AG (corner of Fairfax Drive and Prittlewell Chase) – see Trust Links below. Please let us know if you have difficulty with transport and we will try to help. Unless stated otherwise, our speakers start at 8.00pm, but Growing Together will be open from 7.00pm to allow members to change their books, etc. The next committee meeting is on Monday 8 July at Graham’s. Please notify Graham Oster-Ritter on [email protected] if you wish to receive your newsletter by post/email, or to change your email address. Echo readers may have seen Eileen’s letter in the Echo recently, the full text of which is on another page. Quite separately, we received an email from a friend who lives in the Colchester area, who wrote: ‘Last autumn there was a spill into the upper Colne, west of Halstead, when a farm truck with five pesticides in tipped over into the river. It took five weeks to get down to the estuary, killing fish and wildlife en route.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Aitken, Robin (2013) Can We Trust the BBC? (London: Bloomsbury). Althusser, Louis (1984 [1970]) ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation)’, trans. Ben Brewster, in Essays on Ideology (London: Verso). Amnesty International (2 June 2005) ‘Press Release’ http:// www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/uk-amnesty- launches-appeal-calling-judges-boycott-sham-inquiries. Arts and Humanities Research Council (2013) ‘The Human World: The Arts and Humanities in Our Times’ http://www.ahrc.ac.uk/News-and-Events/News/ Documents/AHRC-Strategy-2013-18.pdf. Arts Council England (2013) Great Art and Culture for Everyone: 10 Year Strategic Framework, 2010–2010, 2nd Edition Revised (Manchester: Arts Council England). Ashcraft, Richard (1987) Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (Boston: Unwin Hyman). Barnett, Anthony et al. (1988) ‘The Original Charter 88’ http://www.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/pages/ the-original-charter-88. Barratt-Brown, Michael ‘The Controllers’ Universities and Left Review 5, Autumn 1958, 53–61, Universities and Left Review 6, Spring 1959, 38–41, Universities and Left Review 7, Autumn 1959, 43–49. Barrett, David and Andy Bloxham (3 October 2010) ‘MPs’ Expenses: The Timeline’The Telegraphhttp://www. telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5335266/ MPs-expenses-the-timeline.html. DOI: 10.1057/9781137351340.0010 Bibliography Baucom, Ian (1999) Out of Place: Englishness, Empire, and the Locations of Identity (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press). BBC ‘Guidelines: Editorial Values’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/ editorialguidelines/page/guidelines-editorial-values-editorial- values. BBC ‘Guidelines: Impartiality – Controversial Subjects’ http://www.bbc. co.uk/editorialguidelines/page/guidelines-impartiality-controversial- subjects/. BBC News (29 December 2006) ‘UK Settles WWII Debts to Allies’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6215847.stm.
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity, Women and Right-Wing Populism the Case of Monroe Vs Hopkins
    Austerity, Women and Right-wing Populism The Case of Monroe vs Hopkins Kirsten Forkert (Birmingham School of Media) Austerity politics in the UK 2015 General Election, a Conservative government continued the austerity n the aftermath of the financial programme. Cuts were applied to a great Icrisis of 2008 and the 2010 General number of welfare benefits such as Child Election, which ended 13 years of rule Benefit, Employment and Housing by the Labour Party, the Conservative Support Allowance, Universal Credit, Liberal-Democrat Coalition government but also to the salaries of public sector undertook a programme of drastic cuts to employees and to the budgets of local public spending. This was justified by the authorities, who in their turn were forced argument that the previous government to close hundreds of libraries and youth had irresponsibly overspent and that the clubs as well as reduce support for creative public must now ‘live within their means’ activities. All these measures together – essentially a revival of the economy- had the combined effect of entrenching as-household metaphor used by former social and economic inequality. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher many years earlier. Like in Thatcher’s time, Women hit hardest this was an argument which was mostly accepted by the public, who – as intended t a closer look the brunt of austerity - made the common-sense intuitive link Awas mostly borne by women, thus between household finances and macro- reversing gains made on gender quality. economics. Although there were vibrant Although women were already at a protests and anti-austerity campaigns, disadvantage because of the gender pay these did not involve a majority of gap - they earn 82 p for every pound the population and did not force the earned by a man - and were more likely government to change course.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Food Insecurity & Food Banks Briefing Memo Exercise
    UK Food Insecurity & Food Banks Briefing Memo Exercise Prepared for: Rt Hon. Emma Lewell-Buck MP By Gavin Wren January 2017 The design, layout and content of this document is the work of Gavin Wren. Contact Gavin directly for more information about specialist food writing, report writing and design/ layout work. [email protected] +44 (0)7931 392 111 Section 1 - The Assignment You are working as a parliamentary researcher for Emma Lewell-Buck, Labour Member of Parliament for South Shields. Mrs Lewell-Buck forwarded a 10-minute rule bill on 29th November 2017, asking the government to measure food insecurity. The bill will have its second reading on 2nd February 2018. BBC Question time has invited Mrs Lewell-Buck to appear as a guest on Thursday 18th January 2018 for a debate on the topic of UK food insecurity. Other guests are Sarah Newton, Conservative MP and Minister of State for Disabled People, Health and Work; Tim Hayward, columnist and broadcaster; Giles Coren, restaurant critic and columnist for The Times and Jack Monroe, activist and food writer. Topics for discussion relate to food insecurity, including food poverty, food banks and the welfare state. Therefore, Mrs Lewell-Buck requires a briefing memo on the relationship between food insecurity, food banks and welfare provision, focussing on rebuttals to Conservative party narratives surrounding food insecurity. Key facts need to be highlighted and recommendations made, focussing on plain English responses suitable for public discourse. UK Food Insecurity & Food Bank Briefing Memo 2 Section 2 - Introduction Food insecurity in the UK appears to be a growing problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Voices of Protest in the Digital Space: Britain's Social Issue Bloggers
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Voices of Protest in the Digital Space: Britain's Social Issue Bloggers Diana Matviyuková Plzeň 2020 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Studijní program Filologie Studijní obor Cizí jazyky pro komerční praxi Kombinace angličtina – ruština Bakalářská práce Voices of Protest in the Digital Space: Britain's Social Issue Bloggers Diana Matviyuková Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Alice Tihelková, Ph.D. Katedra anglického jazyka a literatury Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2020 Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci Voices of Protest in the Digital Space: Britain's Social Issue Bloggers zpracovala samostatně pod vedením vedoucí bakalářské práce a použila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, květen 2020 ___________________________ Poděkování Ráda bych touto cestou poděkovala vedoucí mé bakalářské práce PhDr. Alici Tihelkové, Ph.D., za její odborné vedení, trpělivost a laskavé jednání. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Social Issues in the UK ................................................................................................... 3 The British Housing Crisis ..................................................................................... 4 Why is there a housing crisis? ......................................................................... 4 The 2008 Financial Crisis .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party Conference
    Labour Party Conference Progressive Fringe Guide The progressive fringe guide from Class This guide has been compiled by the Centre for Labour and Social Studies to promote the best fringes at Labour Party Conference 2014. We have tried to include as many as possible and would like to thank all of those involved. We hope you find it useful! What is Class? The Centre for Labour and Social Studies is a growing thinktank established by the trade union movement to act as a centre for left debate and discussion. Class works with a broad coalition of academics to develop alternative policy ideas and ensure the political agenda is on the side of working people. We produce policy papers, pamphlets and run events across the country. Class has the support of a growing number of trade unions including: ASLEF, BFAWU, CWU, GFTU, GMB, FEU, MU, NUM, NUT, PCS, PFA, TSSA, UCATT, UCU and Unite the Union. Find out more Visit our stand 142 in the Third Sector Zone of the Conference Centre or find out more from our website and Twitter. www.classonline.org.uk @classthinktank Progressive fringe listings 20 Saturday 18:00 Campaign for Labour Party Democracy Conference Lift Off! CLPD Rally & Delegates Briefing Jury’s Inn, 56 Bridgwater St, Entry: £3 (Concessions £1) Featuring: Diane Abbott MP; Ann Black NEC; Annelise Dodds MEP; Diana Holland, Unite; Kelvin Hopkins MP; Conrad Landin, Young Labour; Tosh McDonald, ASLEF; Pete Willsman; plus special guest; Chair: Gaye Johnston, CLPD Chair. * * * 12:30 Trades Union Congress Can Labour Deliver radical rail reform? The Hall, the Mechanics Institute, M1 6DD Featuring: Chair: Paul Nowak, Assistant General Secretary TUC; 21 September Sunday Mary Creagh MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Transport; Mick Cash, Acting General Secretary RMT; Mick Whelan, General Secretary, ASLEF; Andi Fox, Exec.
    [Show full text]
  • Complicity in Contemporary Feminist Discourse Giuliana Monteverde
    Complicity in Contemporary Feminist Discourse Giuliana Monteverde BA (Hons) English Literature with Spanish, Faculty of Arts, Ulster University MRes, Complicity in Contemporary Feminist Discourse, Faculty of Arts, Ulster University Faculty of Arts, Ulster University Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2018 I confirm that the word count of this thesis is less than 100,000 words excluding the title page, contents acknowledgements, summary or abstract, abbreviations, footnotes, diagrams, maps, illustrations, tables, appendices, and references or bibliography. Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii Declaration iii Images iv INTRODUCTION: ‘Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!’ 1 0.1 Complicit with what? 3 0.2 Exploring Complicity: Literature Review 10 0.3 The Personal is Political: Complicity in the Women’s Liberation Movement 14 0.4 Moving away from a Complicit Feminist Subject: Research Trajectory 17 0.5 Defining Feminisms, Grappling with Power: Theoretical Framework 22 0.6 Methodological Flights of Fancy, and Case-Studies as Dramatization 30 0.7 What’s New? Original Contribution 38 0.8 Chapter Breakdown 40 CHAPTER 1: ‘Is woman smart to do sex work? Can college student prostitute? Is hooker businessperson?’: Navigating Feminist Histories and Contemporary Culture 42 1.1 ‘All men keep all women in a state of fear’: Previous Feminisms, Essentialism, and Complicity 42 1.2 ‘Women are Strong’/‘No To Feminism’: Contemporary Feminisms, Postfeminist Neoliberalism, and Complicity 51 1.3 ‘We must all make a conscious break with the
    [Show full text]
  • A Victory for Labour's Left-Wing Women
    7/6/2017 Engenderings – A victory for Labour’s left-wing women A victory for Labour’s left-wing women by Rosanna Hutchings Labour’s left-wing women have long been side-lined by the party and by the media. Having refused to engage with the Blairite agenda of the Labour Party from the end of the 1990s, these women received little media attention. This is despite having spearheaded a number of notable campaigns, for example, the London Schools and the Black Child initiative and community-led climate change lobbies. Following Jeremy Corbyn’s election as leader, left-wing women such as Dianne Abbott and Emily Thornberry found themselves for the first time in Labour’s shadow cabinet. Far from receiving a warm reception, or even a political platform, these women were considered ‘wrong’ for Labour. The focus of this piece will be on Emily Thornberry and Diane Abbott, as they have featured most heavily in recent media analysis due to their positions as Shadow Defence Secretary and Shadow Home Secretary. For a substantial period of time in 2015, the media was fond of asking, does Jeremy Corbyn have a woman problem? He did not have a woman problem, but the media did have a Jeremy Corbyn problem. A media mission to discredit Corbyn was launched, and it hit the ground running when he elected his first shadow cabinet in September 2015. Corbyn placed women in his cabinet, but they were the wrong kind of women. He also placed them in the ‘wrong’ roles, and the fact only five women had ever held any of the great offices of state was presented as Corbyn’s problem, not Westminster’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Term Extra-Curricular 2020
    Summer Term Extra-Curricular 2020 1 ACTIVITY Task URL The Universal Museum of Art has lots of virtual exhibitions you can look around. You can https://legacy- walk around at leisure, clicking on pictures you want to learn more about uma.org/exhibition/cats_in_art_hist ory/#/cats_in_art_history_room_1_1 / Lots of real art galleries have virtual tours too; travel to New York, Amsterdam, Paris without https://www.vogue.fr/culture/article leaving the couch! Look around some of the best galleries in the world such as the Louvre or /les-7-plus-beaux-musees-a- the MOMA. We might be in lockdown but you can still travel! decouvrir-en-ligne On a travelling note, Google streetview enables you to explore some magnificent landmarks https://www.mentalfloss.com/article remotely, including the Colosseum in Rome, Diagon Alley from Harry Potter, the Palace of /51904/16-amazing-places-visit- Versailles and the Grand Canyon to name a few google-street-view ART There are some great apps for creating: I Can Animate, where you can create your own Wallace and Gromit style animations Sketch and Sketchbook are good for doodling on tablets. For a bit of fun, check out Google Arts and Culture app where you will find a whole host of https://artsandculture.google.com/ ideas including a lookalike tool. It will match your face with one in its huge database of paintings. Find out a bit about your doppelganger! For those studying Art or not, there are 10 free online courses covering Art and Psychology https://www.google.com/amp/s/ww to Art and Crime! Especially useful for those off to University (to practice independent w.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-10- study) or those applying, as it can add to application evidence university-art-classes-free- online/amp Have a go at playing Chess online! www.chess.com chesskid.com www.lichess.org CHESS Play Chess with Dr Tedd.
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Britain
    Feeding Britain A strategy for zero hunger in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland The report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Hunger in the United Kingdom This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this Report are those of the Inquiry team established by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Hunger and Food Poverty. This report was funded with generous support from the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Charitable Trust Contents Our Inquiry 3 Members of the Inquiry 4 A Personal Perspective on Hunger and Food Poverty – The Bishop of Truro, Tim Thornton 5 The Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Hunger in the United Kingdom 7 Concentrating on hunger 8 A new phenomenon 9 Setting the scene 11 A way forward 14 How should we achieve this goal? 15 Our strategy: A Zero Hunger Britain 16 Feeding Britain 17 Tackling immediate hunger 19 Emergency food assistance providers’ sources of food 21 Waste and surplus redistribution 22 The role of Local Authorities and local models for the future 23 Gas, electricity and water 24 Debt and high-cost credit 26 Access to mobiles and the internet 28 Resilience – cooking, parenting and budgeting 29 Hunger in schools 31 Our recommendations to the political parties 32 Low pay 33 Benefits administration 34 Benefit delays 35 Hardship Payments and Short Term Benefit Advances 36 Tax credits 37 Mandatory Reconsideration 38 Benefit sanctions 39 The Claimant Commitment 42 Crisis Loans and Local Welfare Assistance 45 Summary of recommendations 46 Conclusion 55 2 Our Inquiry This Inquiry was set up by the All-Party The Inquiry held a series of regional sessions Parliamentary Group on Hunger and Food in Birkenhead, Salisbury, Cornwall and South Poverty in April 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Make History Together
    CoNfereNCe ISSUe womensequality.org.uk TweeT US aT The CoNfereNCe USINg #we2016 | Victoria Warehouse, Manchester | Manchester Warehouse, | Victoria LeT’S make 25 – 27 November 25 – 27 history TogeTher welcome To The womeN’S eqUaLITy ParTy’S fIrst CoNfereNCe Join the party! Proudly supported by contents 02-03 04-05 welcome 06-07 Timetable at a glance 08-09 essential information 10 map of manchester 12-13 metrolink map Join 14-15 about the women’s equality Party 16-17 about Party Conference 19 floor plans 22 Day 1: what’s on the agenda us if... 23-28 Day 2: what’s on the agenda 29 Day 3: what’s on the agenda …you’re ready 30-32 who’s who: we team 33 Exhibitors for real change. 34-40 who’s who: Conference speakers 41 who’s who: entertainment 43 Thank you to our members Joining us at conference is a brilliant way to show your support, broaden the debate and to meet the people who are making a difference. Join us as a member today and you’ll be at the heart of an organisation that will transform politics and deliver positive change for generations to come. womensequalityparty.org.uk/join Conference ISSUe TweeT US aT The CoNfereNCe USINg #we2016 04-05 WeLcoMe It is my huge pleasure to welcome We are delighted parents and caregivers. Violence and harassment are integral to the female experience; we are told you to Manchester, where the to welcome you to it is our duty to protect ourselves and therefore Women’s Equality Party is Manchester for the first- our failure if we are attacked or abused.
    [Show full text]