• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Translation of Newton’s Principia into Arabic Under the Aegis of the East India Company: A Rumour Turning into a Myth? K. Razi Naqvi Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology N-7491 Trondheim, Norway Abstract Tafazzul Husain Khan (1727?–1800?), who began his career in the court of Awadh, spent the last two decades of his life as a trusted ally of the East India Company. What set him apart from other court officials was not so much his erudition, political acumen and negotiating prowess, as his favourite pastime: delving into mathematics and astronomy. Contact with the Company per- sonnel, some of whom were conversant with oriental languages and/or contemporary scientific advances, provided him with the opportunity to brush up his mathematical knowledge, and in- duced him to embark upon—and, according to some, bring to fruition—the task of translating a few important mathematical treatises, among them Newton’s Principia. According to Campbell, the author of an obituary notice (published in 1804), “he translated the Principia from the original Latin, into Arabic”. The evidence gathered by Campbell is examined, and found insufficient to warrant this astounding and oft-repeated claim. Of the three tracts authored by Tafazzul (all pub- lished posthumously in abridged versions), none can be described as a translation of Newton’s Principia. Until the emergence of some tangible evidence, any talk of his translations of the Prin- cipia and other western treatises can only be characterised as rumour, a process in which recall is often accompanied by distortion. Keywords: Indian Mathematics (1780–1830), Reuben Burrow, Tafazzul Husain Khan, John Tytler, Diwan Kanh Ji, Maulavi Ghulam Husain 1 Introduction dates, erroneous spellings of proper names)— multiple citations of this work will generate “Don’t cite a publication unless you have read what may be called the academic equivalent of it yourself” is one of the golden rules of aca- rumour. demic authorship [1], and perhaps one that is To offer a justification for invoking the con- cept of rumour, I begin with the words of arXiv:2104.13340v3 [physics.hist-ph] 17 May 2021 flouted most frequently. But even those who abide by the rule merely shift the burden of ve- Bernard Hart, a British psychiatrist [2]: racity from their shoulders to those of the au- Rumour is a complex phenomenon con- thor(s) they cite. If this primary source hap- sisting essentially in the transmission of a re- pens to be reliable, and is cited by a multitude port through a succession of individuals. It may be provisionally regarded as the product of subsequent authors, the process serves to ad- of a series of witnesses, each of whom bears vance learning. However, if the primary source testimony to a statement imparted to him by is of doubtful authenticity, or contains factual his predecessor in the series. The reliability of errors—even small ones (for example, incorrect a rumour depends, therefore, upon the accu- 1 racy with which each such statement is trans- his days as a litterateur,´ mathematician, diplo- mitted, and ultimately upon the accuracy of mat and much else. He lived an eventful life, the report furnished by the first member of the earning both praise and opprobrium, but here series, who is assumed actually to have seen or only those events will be highlighted which are heard the event in question. relevant to his academic activities. The quali- To be sure, the above passage refers specifi- fier Kashm¯ır¯ı was often appended to the above cally to information communicated by word of three names, but he was born in Sialkot, Kash- mouth, but some trivial adjustments will make mir being the region where his ancestors had it applicable to formal citations or written state- once lived [4]. The honorific, Kh¯an-i `All¯am¯a, ments about the authorship of manuscripts. meaning “a scholar par excellence” became a Three decades later two American psychol- part of his name after he achieved eminence for ogists, Allport and Postman (A&P), wrote an his multisided erudition. entire book on the psychology of rumour [3]. They defined a rumour as a specific (or topical) 4 Principal sources for Tafazzul’s life proposition for belief, passed along from per- son to person, usually by word of mouth, with- and works out secure standards of evidence being present. The standard reference for the personal and The central feature of their definition is its in- political aspects of Tafazzul’s life is `Im¯adal- sistence that rumour thrives only in the absence Sa`¯adat [4], written by Ghulam¯ `Al¯ı Khan,¯ an of secure standards of evidence. A&P identified employee of the East India Company. Among two prerequisites for rumour: the theme of other frequently cited authors in this context the story must be of some import to both the are Mirza¯ Abu¯ Taleb[¯ 5], Basu [6] and Cole [7]. speaker and listener, and the true facts must be A short but informative biographical sketch is shrouded in some kind of ambiguity. Among available in Guenther’s article [8]. the multiple causes for this ambiguity, and the resulting (often involuntary) corruption of the The major sources dealing with various as- original report, only one—the incapacity of the pects of Tafazzul’s academic interests and ac- rumour-receiver to grasp the vital detail(s)—is tivities are listed below. Each source will be germane to the issue discussed below. assigned a label (written in bold italics) which will be used for further reference to it in the rest of this article. 2 A note on transliteration Tuhfa: A Persian book [9] with a title usually ab- In the main body of the text, romanization of breviated as Tuhfat al-`Alam¯ . Authored by `Abd al- Persian and Urdu words will be carried out by Lat¯ıf Khan¯ Shushtar¯ ¯ı, who became a personal friend supplementing the familiar substitutions with of Tafazzul, this book provides glimpses into the scholarly schedule followed by Tafazzul during the three diacritical signs: a macron (a bar) placed last years of his life. over a short vowel sign will indicate the length- ening of the vowel, and the following substi- Obituary: An obituary notice written by Lawrence tutions will be used: ¨ = ` and Z (hamza) = '. Dundas Campbell [10]. More details about this A more elaborate notation, explained in Ap- source are given later. pendixA, will be used in the bibliography. Leaflet: Syed Mahomed Ali (hereafter SMA), a de- scendant of Tafazzul, published a leaflet titled Life of Tuffuzzool Hussain Khan, a choice that might lead 3 Who was Tafazzul Husain Kh¯an? a reader into expecting more than is delivered [11]; it consists of five Extracts (1–5, listed on pp. i–ii), Tafazzul Husain Khan¯ (1727?–1801?), who will none of which is from the pen of the compiler. Part henceforth be called Tafazzul, was known in I consists of Extracts 1 and 2, the first of which is 2 taken from Lord Teignmouth’s Memoir published in much harder for an author writing in Persian, 1843 [12], and the second from a review of the Mem- which has a significantly smaller inventory of oir, published a year later [13]. Part III, which is of consonants and vowels than Urdu; further- no interest to us, reproduces Extracts 3 and 5, two more, Shushtar¯ ¯ı follows (with very few excep- official letters concerning pensions granted by the tions) the customary omission of short vow- Company to Tafazzul’s cousin and son. The text of Part II was meant to be identical with that of Obitu- els even when he transcribes European names, ary, but a great many clerical discrepancies and er- and seems to rely on memory rather than rors crept in when the text was typeset for inclusion meticulous note-taking. To take just one exam- in Leaflet (see AppendixD). The original sources ple now, he mentions a certain ñËPAK. QÓ, calls for the texts of Extracts 1, 2 and 4 have existed in the him “a sage the likes of whom are few even public domain for quite some time, which means in England” [9, p. 454], and states that it was Leaflet that citing now amounts to drinking pol- this scholar who imparted Western learning to luted water when clean is available. Tafazzul. When Edward Rehatsek (1819–91) UrduBio: Some seven years after the publication of reviewed Tuhfa for a library catalogue edited Leaflet, SMA wrote an Urdu biography [14], which by him [17], he came to the eminently rea- draws from Ref. [4], Tuhfa and Obituary, and pro- sonable conclusion that Shushtar¯ ¯ı must have vides very little additional information of value. meant “Mr. Barlow”, and there indeed was Chronograms: Thomas William Beale, whose main a Sir George Hilaro Barlow in the neighbour- literary interest was collection and composition hood [18], but hardly likely to have been a of chronograms (in Persian and Urdu), published good enough mathematician to be called a sage a massive collection of chronograms (along with with few peers. The name of the real sage was some biographical information in prose) under the “Reuben Burrow” [18]. Other spelling aberra- title Mift¯ah al-Taw¯ar¯ıkh [15]. This rather unusual tions will be mentioned later. compilation (in Persian) was described in some de- tail by Elliot in The History of India as told by Its Own Far more alarming than transcription id- Historians, The Muhammadan Period [16]. The literal iosyncrasies and scribal transgressions is that meaning of the title is Key to Histories, but a glance Shushtar¯ ¯ı has earned the reputation of hav- at the contents makes it clear that Beale is using ing been well informed about post-Newton as- the noun t¯ar¯ıkh, which could mean history or chrono- tronomy.

Load more

  34

Copy Link