DOCSLIB.ORG

BR IFIC N° 2748 Index/Indice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BR IFIC N° 2748 Index/Indice BR IFIC N° 2748 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 09.07.2013 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 113086016 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 2 113086017 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 3 113086018 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 4 113086019 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 5 113086020 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 6 113086021 BLR 18.1200 ZHLOBIN BLR 30°E00'00'' 52°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 7 113086022 BLR 18.1570 LEPEL BLR 29°E08'00'' 54°N56'00'' FX 1 SUP 8 113086023 BLR 18.1570 LEPEL BLR 29°E08'00'' 54°N56'00'' FX 1 SUP 9 113086024 BLR 18.1570 LEPEL BLR 29°E08'00'' 54°N56'00'' FX 1 SUP 10 113086025 BLR 18.2157 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 11 113086026 BLR 18.2157 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 12 113086027 BLR 18.2157 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 13 113086028 BLR 18.2455 BORISOV BLR 28°E30'00'' 54°N15'00'' FX 1 SUP 14 113086029 BLR 18.2455 BORISOV BLR 28°E30'00'' 54°N15'00'' FX 1 SUP BR IFIC N° 2748 09.07.2013 No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 15 113086030 BLR 18.2828 BREST BLR 23°E39'00'' 52°N07'00'' FX 1 SUP 16 113086031 BLR 18.2828 BREST BLR 23°E39'00'' 52°N07'00'' FX 1 SUP 17 113086032 BLR 18.2828 BREST BLR 23°E39'00'' 52°N07'00'' FX 1 SUP 18 113086033 BLR 18.3360 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 19 113086034 BLR 18.3360 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 20 113086035 BLR 18.3360 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 21 113086036 BLR 18.3360 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 22 113086037 BLR 18.3360 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 23 113086039 BLR 18.4578 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 24 113086040 BLR 18.4578 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 25 113086041 BLR 18.4578 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 26 113086042 BLR 18.4578 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 27 113086043 BLR 18.4578 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 28 113086044 BLR 18.5310 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 29 113086045 BLR 18.5310 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 30 113086046 BLR 18.5310 BOBRUYSK BLR 29°E12'00'' 53°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 31 113086047 BLR 18.5700 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 32 113086048 BLR 18.5700 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 33 113086049 BLR 18.5700 POLOTSK BLR 28°E50'00'' 54°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 34 113086050 BLR 18.6300 KALINKOVICHI BLR 29°E32'00'' 52°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 35 113086051 BLR 18.6300 KALINKOVICHI BLR 29°E32'00'' 52°N05'00'' FX 1 SUP 36 113086052 BLR 18.7323 CHERVEN BLR 28°E25'00'' 53°N42'00'' FX 1 SUP 37 113086053 BLR 18.7323 CHERVEN BLR 28°E25'00'' 53°N42'00'' FX 1 SUP 38 113086054 BLR 18.7900 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 39 113086055 BLR 18.7900 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 40 113086056 BLR 18.7900 MINSK BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 41 113086057 BLR 18.8110 SHUMILINO BLR 29°E34'00'' 55°N19'00'' FX 1 SUP 42 113086058 BLR 18.8110 SHUMILINO BLR 29°E34'00'' 55°N19'00'' FX 1 SUP 43 113086059 BLR 19.0820 SLUTSK BLR 27°E30'00'' 53°N01'00'' FX 1 SUP 44 113086060 BLR 19.0820 SLUTSK BLR 27°E30'00'' 53°N01'00'' FX 1 SUP 45 113086061 BLR 19.0820 SLUTSK BLR 27°E30'00'' 53°N01'00'' FX 1 SUP 46 113086062 BLR 19.1140 LUTCHNIKI BLR 27°E13'00'' 53°N04'00'' FX 1 SUP 47 113086063 BLR 19.1140 LUTCHNIKI BLR 27°E13'00'' 53°N04'00'' FX 1 SUP 48 113086064 BLR 19.4840 LEPEL BLR 29°E08'00'' 54°N56'00'' FX 1 SUP 49 113086065 BLR 19.4840 LEPEL BLR 29°E08'00'' 54°N56'00'' FX 1 SUP 50 113086066 BLR 19.5090 MOGILEV BLR 30°E17'00'' 53°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 51 113086067 BLR 19.5090 MOGILEV BLR 30°E17'00'' 53°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 52 113086068 BLR 19.5090 MOGILEV BLR 30°E17'00'' 53°N55'00'' FX 1 SUP 53 113086069 BLR 19.5180 ORSHA BLR 30°E27'00'' 54°N31'00'' FX 1 SUP 54 113086070 BLR 19.5180 ORSHA BLR 30°E27'00'' 54°N31'00'' FX 1 SUP BR IFIC N° 2748 09.07.2013 No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 55 113086071 BLR 19.5180 ORSHA BLR 30°E27'00'' 54°N31'00'' FX 1 SUP 56 113086072 BLR 19.5670 SHUMILINO BLR 29°E34'00'' 55°N19'00'' FX 1 SUP 57 113086073 BLR 19.5670 SHUMILINO BLR 29°E34'00'' 55°N19'00'' FX 1 SUP 58 113086074 BLR 19.5670 SHUMILINO BLR 29°E34'00'' 55°N19'00'' FX 1 SUP 59 113086075 BLR 19.5910 CHERVEN BLR 28°E25'00'' 53°N42'00'' FX 1 SUP 60 113086076 BLR 19.5910 CHERVEN BLR 28°E25'00'' 53°N42'00'' FX 1 SUP 61 113086077 BLR 19.5910 CHERVEN BLR 28°E25'00'' 53°N42'00'' FX 1 SUP 62 113086078 BLR 19.6040 ORSHA BLR 30°E27'00'' 54°N31'00'' FX 1 SUP 63 113086079 BLR 19.6040 ORSHA BLR 30°E27'00'' 54°N31'00'' FX 1 SUP 64 113086080 BLR 19.6510 LUTCHNIKI BLR 27°E13'00'' 53°N04'00'' FX 1 SUP 65 113086081 BLR 19.6510 LUTCHNIKI BLR 27°E13'00'' 53°N04'00'' FX 1 SUP 66 113086082 BLR 19.6510 LUTCHNIKI BLR 27°E13'00'' 53°N04'00'' FX 1 SUP 67 113086083 BLR 19.6560 MINSK KOLODIST BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 68 113086084 BLR 19.6560 MINSK KOLODIST BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 69 113086085 BLR 19.6560 MINSK KOLODIST BLR 27°E31'00'' 53°N53'00'' FX 1 SUP 70 113090331 BLR 22256.0000 BEREZOVKA BLR 25°E30'26'' 53°N43'08'' FX 1 ADD 71 113090365 BLR 22256.0000 BREST BLR 23°E44'11'' 52°N07'03'' FX 1 ADD 72 113090351 BLR 22256.0000 CHERNI BLR 23°E45'04'' 52°N08'58'' FX 1 ADD 73 113090333 BLR 22256.0000 DAVID GORODOK BLR 27°E11'52'' 52°N03'13'' FX 1 ADD 74 113090317 BLR 22256.0000 DROGICHIN BLR 25°E09'49'' 52°N11'33'' FX 1 ADD 75 113090327 BLR 22256.0000 ELSK BLR 29°E10'15'' 51°N48'47'' FX 1 ADD 76 113090345 BLR 22256.0000 GRODNO BLR 23°E51'47'' 53°N40'38'' FX 1 ADD 77 113090359 BLR 22256.0000 GRODNO BLR 23°E46'42'' 53°N39'48'' FX 1 ADD 78 113090325 BLR 22256.0000 KRASNOPOLIE BLR 31°E23'09'' 53°N19'36'' FX 1 ADD 79 113090341 BLR 22256.0000 MALORITA BLR 24°E04'57'' 51°N47'31'' FX 1 ADD 80 113090357 BLR 22256.0000 ORSHA BLR 30°E25'53'' 54°N31'40'' FX 1 ADD 81 113090343 BLR 22256.0000 POLOTSK BLR 28°E48'31'' 55°N29'43'' FX 1 ADD 82 113090335 BLR 22256.0000 POSTAVY BLR 26°E51'25'' 55°N06'50'' FX 1 ADD 83 113090339 BLR 22256.0000 RADUN BLR 24°E59'27'' 54°N03'02'' FX 1 ADD 84 113090337 BLR 22256.0000 SHARKOVSCHINA BLR 27°E28'07'' 55°N21'54'' FX 1 ADD 85 113090363 BLR 22263.0000 BELOOZERSK BLR 25°E10'20'' 52°N28'23'' FX 1 ADD 86 113090349 BLR 22263.0000 FABRICHNYY BLR 23°E48'46'' 53°N37'49'' FX 1 ADD 87 113090316 BLR 22263.0000 GOMEL BLR 30°E56'37'' 52°N25'24'' FX 1 ADD 88 113090323 BLR 22263.0000 ORSHA BLR 30°E23'46'' 54°N30'36'' FX 1 ADD 89 113090361 BLR 22263.0000 RECHITSA BLR 30°E23'39'' 52°N22'04'' FX 1 ADD 90 113090329 BLR 22270.0000 CHECHERSK BLR 30°E55'04'' 52°N54'54'' FX 1 ADD 91 113090347 BLR 22270.0000 GOMEL BLR 31°E01'02'' 52°N26'49'' FX 1 ADD 92 113090353 BLR 22270.0000 VERKHNEDVINSK BLR 27°E56'01'' 55°N46'55'' FX 1 ADD 93 113090319 BLR 22277.0000 GOMEL BLR 31°E00'46'' 52°N25'27'' FX 1 ADD 94 113090321 BLR 22277.0000 GRODNO BLR 23°E50'20'' 53°N40'34'' FX 1 ADD BR IFIC N° 2748 09.07.2013 No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 181 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Spatial Development of Territories (SDT 2020) The Role of Citi-forming Industrial Enterprises in the Development of Innovative and Investment Attractiveness of Russian Regions (on the Example of Stary Oskol, Belgorod Region and the «OEMKINVEST ltd») Elena Chizhova Irina Rozdolskaya Department of the Theory and Science Methodology, Economics Department of Marketing and Management and Management Institute Belgorod University of Cooperation, Belgorod State Technological University Economics & Law named after V.G. Shukhov Belgorod, Russia Belgorod, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Sergey Chizhov VeraTuaeva Department of Economics and Production Organization, Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, Economics and Management Institute Belgorod State Construction Engineering Institute Technological University Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov named after V.G. Shukhov Belgorod, Russia Belgorod, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—The article considers the role of single-industry towns and city-forming enterprises in the formation of the I. INTRODUCTION investment attractiveness of the region. It is shown that from an In Russia, as in other countries of the world, there is a epoch of industrialisation we’ve got a problem of settlements of problem of single-industry town (monotown). Single- the various size having monoindustrial structure. But monocities of the Belgorod region which basic manufacture is industry town is characterized by the systemic unity of its the extraction of iron ore, have kept the specialisation and socio-economic organization and the functioning of the city- investment appeal. The city of Stary Oskol having single- forming enterprise [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Culture in Augmented Social Reality: Conjunction Versus Disjunction
    URBAN CULTURE IN AUGMENTED SOCIAL REALITY: CONJUNCTION VERSUS DISJUNCTION AUTHORSHIP INTRODUCTION Valentin P. Babintsev The life activity of urbanized communities DSc of Philosophy, Professor, Belgorod State National Research (potentially including all the urban citizens but University, Pobedy St., 85, 308015 Belgorod, Russia. in reality - only those who at least from time to ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0112-6145 time voluntarily take part in solving urban E-mail: [email protected] problems, therefore, acquired the status of Galina N. Gaidukova subject) in the modern, extremely unstable PhD of Sociology, Associate Professor, Belgorod State National reality, is characterized by a contradictory Research University, Pobedy St., 85, 308015 Belgorod, Russia. interaction of two tendencies that are often ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-9174 E-mail: [email protected] defined as social conjunction and social disjunction. Russian researcher O.A. Zhanna A. Shapoval Karmadonov considers social conjunction as PhD of Sociology, Associate Professor, Belgorod State National Research University, Pobedy St., 85, 308015 Belgorod, Russia. “a process that is ultimately focused on social ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8069-9274 reproduction, based on consistent solidarity, E-mail: [email protected] provided with full-fledged flows of social Received in: Approved in: 2021-03-10 2021-07-15 consolidation in all levels and structural DOI: https://doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-E1233p.537-548 elements of society” (KARMADONOV, 2015, p. 11). While the disjunction, according to O.A. Karmadonov, is a process of "disorder, mismatch and disintegration of integration means, accompanied by a weakening of consolidation flows and problematization of the main goal of integration, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Framework of Russia. the 250 Largest Industrial Centers Of
    INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA 250 LARGEST INDUSTRIAL CENTERS OF RUSSIA Metodology of the Ranking. Data collection INDUSTRIAL FRAMEWORK OF RUSSIA The ranking is based on the municipal statistics published by the Federal State Statistics Service on the official website1. Basic indicator is Shipment of The 250 Largest Industrial Centers of own production goods, works performed and services rendered related to mining and manufacturing in 2010. The revenue in electricity, gas and water Russia production and supply was taken into account only regarding major power plants which belong to major generation companies of the wholesale electricity market. Therefore, the financial results of urban utilities and other About the Ranking public services are not taken into account in the industrial ranking. The aim of the ranking is to observe the most significant industrial centers in Spatial analysis regarding the allocation of business (productive) assets of the Russia which play the major role in the national economy and create the leading Russian and multinational companies2 was performed. Integrated basis for national welfare. Spatial allocation, sectorial and corporate rankings and company reports was analyzed. That is why with the help of the structure of the 250 Largest Industrial Centers determine “growing points” ranking one could follow relationship between welfare of a city and activities and “depression areas” on the map of Russia. The ranking allows evaluation of large enterprises. Regarding financial results of basic enterprises some of the role of primary production sector at the local level, comparison of the statistical data was adjusted, for example in case an enterprise is related to a importance of large enterprises and medium business in the structure of city but it is located outside of the city border.
    [Show full text]
  • Storytelling and Its Potential in the Development of Tourist Destinations in the Post-Pandemic Age
    E3S Web of Conferences 291, 06002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129106002 SDGG 2021 Storytelling and its potential in the development of tourist destinations in the post-pandemic age Lyudmila Semenova1, Tatiana Klimova2, and Irina Bogomazova2 1Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, st. Gorky, 32, 236041 Kaliningrad, Russia 2Belgorod State National Research University, st. Pobedy, 85, 308015 Belgorod, Russia Abstract. Information obtained from any source is forgotten after three days. The exception is the one that is of particular importance and is broadcast through stories. The ongoing transformation of the needs of tourists is reflected in the diversification of the tourist offer. In this regard, storytelling has received particular relevance and development. Storytelling technologies are the process of communicating information as a result of the use of stories and legends. The article analyzes the state and development prospects of the region as an attractive tourist destination, suggests a model for promoting a regional tourist destination based on storytelling. The development and comprehensive implementation of projects, taking into account the interests of all participants, will provide an opportunity to promote and develop the territory as an attractive tourist destination, which is of paramount importance in modern socio-economic conditions. 1 Introduction The COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic and the travel restrictions are changing the development potential of the tourism industry, both in Russia and around the world. The results of 2020 testify to the deplorable state of the tourism sector and, as a result, its finding in extreme conditions. According to the Border Service of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation, Russian citizens made 71% fewer trips compared to 2019, namely 14 million trips to foreign countries, and more than half of the trips fell on the "pre-quarantine" first quarter of 2020 - almost 54%.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities and Black Earth Soils
    Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach ISSN 2083-8611 Nr 334 · 2017 Ekonomia 12 Liudmila Popkova Anna Popkova Kursk State University, Kursk, Russia Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia Economic and Social Geography Department Faculty of Foreign Languages and Area Studies [email protected] [email protected] URBANISATION OF AGRICULTURAL AREAS: CITIES AND BLACK EARTH SOILS Summary: The article is devoted to the impact of the black earth soils on the formation of urban settlement. The features of development and settlement of the Central Black Earth Region are examined. The main colonization flows and their impact on the modern structure of the population are stated, the migration attractiveness of the region is de- scribed. The territories with fertile black earth soils are analyzed in terms of their in- volvement in economic circulation processes. Cities are characterized as the central points of the settlement. Particular attention is paid to the role of regional centers. The influence of the most significant factors on the contemporary urban settlement structure is evaluated: the construction of railways, iron ore mining and production of ferrous metals. The role of soils in urban development and the processes of urbanization are analyzed. Keywords: city, urbanization, black earth soils. JEL Classification: P25, Q16, Q18. The dependence of the citizens’ lives on the soil conditions is no longer ev- ident. However, the cities that arose and developed on the black earth soils have geographical features, which indirectly effect the socio-economic development. The degree of involvement in agriculture, based on the fertility of black soils, is reflected, in particular, on the type of industrial production.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint-Stock Central Telecommunication Company Code of the Issuer
    QUARTERLY REPORT Joint-Stock Central Telecommunication Company Code of the Issuer: 00194-A for the 2nd quarter of 2004 Domicile: 23 Proletarskaya Street, Khimki, the Moscow region, 141400, Russia Mailing address: 6 Degtiarny Pereulok, Building 2, GSP-3, Moscow, 125993, Russia The information in this quarterly report is disclosed pursuant to applicable law of the Russian Federation on securities. (signed by) R. Amaryan General Director JSC CenterTelecom Date: August 13, 2004 R. Konstantinova Chief Accountant Date: August 13, 2004 (seal) Contact person: Ms. Natalia Sudareva, Deputy Director, Department of Securities and Corporate Management, Head of Securities Issues Tel.: (+7 095) 209-38-49 Fax: (+7 095) 209-28-29 e-mail: [email protected] The information disclosed in this quarterly report is posted at: http://www.centertelecom.ru/index.html?d=63 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................5 I. Background of persons-members of the Issuer’s governing bodies, information on bank accounts, the auditor, appraiser, and financial consultant of the Issuer, and other persons who signed the quarterly report .................29 1.1 Members of the governing bodies of the Issuer ...........................................................................................................29 1.2 Information on bank accounts of the issuer .................................................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Kharkov ’43 Was the Final Successful Operation for the Axis Forces in Russia
    DESIGNER NOTES & HISTORY DOCUMENT THE CAMPAIGN Kharkov ’43 was the final successful operation for the Axis forces in Russia. It marked the end of the Stalingrad tragedy and the prelude to Kursk. It was a sweeping campaign, with large distances and low unit densities making it more akin to a desert campaign than the Eastern front. This operation was actually the Third battle of Kharkov following on the German capture of the city in September 1941 and the Soviet attempt to recapture the city in May 1942 (as simulated in Kharkov ’42). There was a Fourth battle of Kharkov in August 1943 where the Soviets liberated the city for a final time in the Polkovodets Rumyantsev offensive post Kursk. When looking at this operation it became apparent that there were three distinct phases in the battle. • The Soviet Offensive – The Star & Gallop operations, Feb 2nd to Feb 19th. • Manstein’s Backhand blow against South Western Front, Feb 20th to Mar 5th • The German recapture of Kharkov and the shattering of Voronezh Front, Mar 6th to Mar 18th It was decided to create a base campaign for each of these periods, rather than one 450 turn game. The reasoning behind this decision was the extremely fluid situation and the fact that building victory conditions for each side in a ‘mega campaign’ where the objectives changed over time was next to impossible. Further complicating this was that some units were Page 1 withdrawn and refurbished (Gross Deutschland, for example) which would be very difficult to handle in terms of game play. Once this decision was made it ensured that the individual campaigns would be playable due to their moderate length (57 – 180 turns), and allow all scenarios to be tested sufficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • 26621-26634 Page 26621 Margarita Viktorovna Perkova*Et Al
    Margarita Viktorovna Perkova*et al. /International Journal of Pharmacy & Technology ISSN: 0975-766X CODEN: IJPTFI Available Online through Research Article www.ijptonline.com REGIONAL SETTLEMENT SYSTEM Margarita Viktorovna Perkova Belgorod State Technological University named after VG Shukhov Russia, 308012, Belgorod, Kostyukov str., 46. Received on 25-10-2016 Accepted on 02-11-2016 Abstract. The study examined a regional settlement system in respect of the aspect of the interaction between economics, sociology, geography, urban planning and development of regional management system. Regional settlement system is an open space system which variables can be described as a mixed way (quantitatively and qualitatively). Subsystems of a regional settlement system (natural and historical-cultural framework, transport, economy, population) are identified. The dynamics of the historical development of subsystems and their interaction are considered by the example of the Belgorod region which is a regional settlement system. A regional system is complex and interrelated by its elements and satisfies to the system concept of functional integrity. Changing the configuration properties of a territory leads to a change in its target function. Keywords: regional settlement system, sustainable development, transport infrastructure, economy, population, natural framework, historical-cultural framework, Belgorod region. Introduction. Successful territorial development of a country depends on rates and prospects for the development of regional settlement systems. Regional settlement system is considered in respect of the aspect of the interaction between economics, sociology, geography, urban planning and development of regional management system [1]. So far, a unified approach to determination of essence and content of a region as an object of study has not been developed yet.
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 10.03.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109013920 ARG 7156.0000 CASEROS ARG 58W28'29'' 32S27'41'' FX 1 ADD 2 109013877
    [Show full text]
  • Poland 20 – Lesser Poland & Silesia Regions – 3-30 March
    Poland 20 – Lesser Poland & Silesia regions – 3-30 March A Yahad - In Unum field research team, led by Yahad Deputy Research Director Michal Chojak, investigated the voivodeships of Lesser Poland and Silesia from the March 13th-30th. This was Yahad's 20th research trip to Poland. The team began by interviewing witnesses to shootings at three major shooting sites in the south of the Lesser Poland region: Nowy Targ (1,500 Jewish victims), Rabka (500 victims) and Mszana Dolna (881 victims). At Mszana Dolna, the team interviewed four witnesses who were able to describe the precise chronology of the massacre of the Jews. The day before the shooting, at around 3pm, around thirty young Poles from Rabka and surrounding villages were requisitioned by the local administration, under German control, to dig two large pits in the field next to the manor. They finished digging at around 5am as the Jews were being rounded up. By 6am, on the 19th August 1942, the Jews were gathered at the marketplace. The first shots were heard around 9am. The victims - men, women and children - were forced to walk out onto a plank placed over the pit, before being shot by men from a special commando, under the supervision of Heinrich Hamann, Gestapo chief of Nowy Sacz. By 1pm, the shooting was finished. The executioners celebrated the shooting in a restaurant at Mszana Dolna until late into the night. During the second part of the field trip, the Yahad team moved on to Silesia. This was the first time Yahad has carried out field research in the region, which had been annexed by the Third Reich in September 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • Departure City City ​​Of Delivery Region Delivery Delivery Time
    Cost of Estimated Departure city city ​​of delivery Region delivery delivery time Moscow Ababurovo Moscow 655 1 Moscow Abaza The Republic of Khakassia 1401 6 Moscow Abakan The Republic of Khakassia 722 2 Moscow Abbakumova Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abdrakhmanovo Republic of Tatarstan 682 on request Moscow Abdreevo Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abdulov Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abinsk Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Abramovka Ulyanovsk region 1360 5 Moscow Abramovskikh Sverdlovsk region 1360 1 Moscow Abramtsevo Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Abramtzevo (Dmitrovsky reg) Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Abrau Durso Krasnodar region 682 1 Moscow Avvakumova Tver region 655 5 Moscow Avdotyino Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Avdotyino (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Averkieva Moscow Moscow region 1360 2 (Pavlovsky Posadskiy reg) Aviation workers Moscow Moscow region 1360 1 (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow aviators Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Aviation Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Motorist Arhangelsk region 655 1 Moscow avtopoligone Moscow region 1360 3 Moscow Autoroute Moscow region 655 1 Moscow agarin Moscow region 655 1 Moscow Agarin (Stupinsky reg) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agafonov Moscow region 655 1 Moscow AGAFONOVA (Odintsovskiy-one) Moscow region 1360 1 Moscow Agashkino Moscow region 655 5 Moscow Ageevka Oryol Region 655 1 Moscow Agidel Republic of Bashkortostan 1360 3 Moscow Agha Krasnodar region 682 3 Moscow Agrarnik Tver region 1306 6 Moscow agricultural Republic of Crimea 682 4 Moscow agrogorodok Moscow region
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2627 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2627 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 02.09.2008 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 108068419 ARG 6460.0000 CHAJARI ARG 57W57'22'' 30S44'53'' FX 1 ADD 2 108068420
    [Show full text]