DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Lists and Indexes of Names and Works in Zoology. Supplement 1986-2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Lists and Indexes of Names and Works in Zoology. Supplement 1986-2000 OFFICIAL LISTS AND INDEXES OF NAMES AND WORKS IN ZOOLOGY Supplement 1986-2000 Edited by J. D. D. SMITH Copyright International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 2001 ISBN 0 85301 007 2 Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature c/o The Natural History Museum Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD U.K. on behalf of lICZtN] The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 2001 STATUS OF ENTRIES ON OFFICIAL LISTS AND INDEXES OFFICIAL LISTS The status of names, nomenclatural acts and works entered in an Official List is regulated by Article 80.6 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. All names on Official Lists are available and they may be used as valid, subject to the provisions of the Code and to any conditions recorded in the relevant entries on the Official List or in the rulings recorded in the Opinions or Directions which relate to those entries. However, if a name on an Official List is given a different status by an adopted Part of the List of Available Names in Zoology the status in the latter is to be taken as correct (Article 80.8). A name or nomenclatural act occurring in a work entered in the Official List of Works Approved as Available for Zoological Nomenclature is subject to the provisions of the Code, and to any limitations which may have been imposed by the Commission on the use of that work in zoological nomenclature. OFFICIAL INDEXES The status of names, nomenclatural acts and works entered in an Official Index is regulated by Article 80.7 of the Code. Names entered in an Official Index may or may not be available, as determined by the relevant entries and by the rulings in the Opinions or Directions relating to those entries. Names entered in an Official Index cannot be used as valid, unless this is permitted by a ruling of the Commission or in the case of junior homonyms or junior objective synonyms by the rejection of the relevant senior names under the provisions of the Code. No name or nomenclatural act occurring in a work entered in the Official Index of Rejected and Invalid Works in Zoological Nomenclature has any availability or validity in zoological nomenclature, unless the Commission has ruled otherwise. However, such a suppressed or rejected work may be used as a source of information relevant to zoological nomenclature unless the Commission has expressly ruled that the work is to be treated as unpublished. OFFICIAL LISTS AND INDEXES INTRODUCTORY NOTE The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature was founded in Leiden in 1895 during the 3rd International Congress of Zoology. It is devoted entirely to providing a service for the zoological and palaeontological community and has the task of stabilising and promoting uniformity in the nomenclature of animals without interfering with taxonomic freedom. To this end, the Commission publishes the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, the 4th Edition of which came into effect on 1 January 2000 and contains the definitive rules for the application of zoological names. The Commission is empowered to suspend the rules when their strict application would cause confusion or would act against stability or universality in nomenclature. This can only be done by the use of the Commission's plenary power and after discussion with interested zoologists; such problems are discussed in the Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature before the Commission reaches a final decision by means of a vote. The Commission's rulings are published in the Bulletin in the form of Opinions. The family-group, generic and specific names and the titles of works upon which the Commission has ruled are placed on the Commission's Official Lists or Official Indexes. In 1987 the International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, which handles the Commission's publishing and financial affairs, published the Official Lists and Indexes of Names and Works in Zoology. That book gave details of all names and works which had been placed on the Official Lists and Indexes up to the end of 1985. The volume contained 9917 entries, 9783 being family-group, generic or specific names and 134 entries relating to works. In the 15 years 1986-2000 inclusive a further 601 Opinions and Directions have been published in the Bulletin, listing 2371 names and 14 works placed on the Official Lists and Indexes. Details of these 2385 entries are given in the present Supplement, together with emendments to the entries in the 1987 volume. Additional sections are (a) a table correlating the nominal type species of genera listed in the 1987 volume with the valid, but different, names of those species, (b) a systematic index of all names on the Official Lists in the 1987 volume and this Supplement, and (c) a bibliographic reference to Opinions and Directions summarised in this Supplement. A number of changes have been made in the layout for this Supplement. Family-group, generic and specific names have been grouped in one list rather than given separately as in the 1987 volume. Furthermore, the systematic group is shown for all names and not, as previously, only for names placed on the Official Lists. Two points made in the 1987 volume should be emphasised. First, names have been placed on the Official Lists and Indexes over a span of many years, and the varied wording of the entries reflects differing practices on the part of the Commission. Secondly, the 1987 volume inevitably contains some errors, most of which have been corrected when known. However, earlier authorships of some names (mainly at family-group level) have not been incorporated because the Commission and Secretariat have not had an opportunity to consider the implications, and in some systematic groups the earliest authorships have never been investigated in detail. Meanwhile, the Commission and Secretariat would welcome notification of errors for correction in any subsequent edition of the Official Lists and Indexes. NAMES PLACED ON THE OFFICIAL LISTS AND INDEXES Names placed on the Official Lists and Indexes in Opinions and Acrochordium Meyen, 1834, Novorum Actorum Academiae Directions published in Volumes 43 (1986) to 57 (2000) of the Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Naturae Curiosorum, Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 16(Supplement 1): 165 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not This section lists in alphabetic order every family-group, for those of the Principle of Homonymy) (Hydrozoa). Op. generic and specific name placed on the Official Lists and 1752 Indexes; specific names are given in their original binomen. Names on the Official Lists are in bold type and those on the Acrolepiopsis Gaedike, 1970, Entomologische Abhandlungen, Official Indexes in non-bold type. The Direction or Opinion Staatliche Museum fur Tierkunde in Dresden, 38(1): 32 number under which each name was placed on the Official (gender: feminine) (type species, by original designation: List or Index is given at the end of that entry. Roeslerstammia assectella Zeller, 1839) (Lepidoptera). Op. 1910 aalensis, Loligo, Schubler in Zieten, 1832, Die Versteinerungen Wiirttembergs, Expeditum des Werkes 'Unsere Zeit', part 5, Acrolocha Thomson, 1858, Ofversigt af Kungliga Vetenskaps- p. 34 (specific name of the type species of Loligosepia akademiens Forhandlingar, 15: 38 (gender: feminine) (type Quenstedt, 1839) (Cephalopoda, Coleoidea). Op. 1914 species, by original designation: Omalium striatum Gravenhorst, 1802) (Coleoptera). Op. 1722 abildgaardi, Sparus, Bloch, 1791, Naturgeschichte der auslandischen Fische, part 4, p. 22 (suppressed under the Actia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, Memoires presentes par divers plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority Savants a VAcademie Royale des Sciences de ITnstitut de but not for those of the Principle of Homonymy) France, vol. 2, p. 85 (gender: feminine) (type species, by (Osteichthyes, Perciformes). Op. 1945 designation under the plenary power: Roeselia lamia Meigen, 1838) (Diptera). Op. 1432 Acamptopoeum Cockerell, 1905, Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 31: 320 (gender: neuter) (type Actinodoris Ehrenberg, 1831, Symbolae physicae seu icones et species, by designation under the plenary power: descriptiones animalium evertabratorum sepositis insectis Camptopoeum submetallicum Spinola, 1851) (Hymen- quae ex itinere per Africam borealem et Asiam occidentalem. optera). Op. 1759 Decas 1 Mollusca (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those Acanthophthalmus van Hasselt in Temminck, 1824, Bulletin of the Principle of Homonymy) (Gastropoda). Op. 1375 des Sciences Naturelles et de Geologie, 2(Zoologie): 376 (a junior objective synonym of Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758) Aculea Perry, 1810, Arcana, or the Museum of Natural History, (Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes). Op. 1695 pi. 15 (suppressed under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle of Priority but not for those of the Acanthoteuthis Wagner, 1839, in Miinster, G. Graf zu (Ed.), Principle of Homonymy) (Gastropoda). Op. 1677 Beitrdge zur Petrefacten-Kunde, part 1, p. 94 (gender: feminine) (type species, by subsequent designation by aculeatus, Tropidolepis, Gray, 1831, in Griffith, E. & Pidgeon, Bulow-Trummer, 1920, Fossilium Catalogus, 1 (Animalia), E. (Eds.), The animal kingdom arranged in conformity with part 11, p. 268: Acanthoteuthis speciosa Minister, 1839) its organization, by the Baron Cuvier, with additional (Cephalopoda, Coleoidea). Op. 1860 descriptions of all the species hitherto named, and of many not before noticed, vol. 9 (Supplement), p. 43 (suppressed Acantophthalmus van Hasselt, 1823, Algemeene Konst- en under the plenary power for the purposes of the Principle Letter-Bode voor het jaar 1823, II deel, no. 35, p. 133 (a of Priority but not for those of the Principle of junior objective synonym of Cobitis Linnaeus, 1758) Homonymy) (Reptilia, Squamata). Op. 1909 (Osteichthyes, Cypriniformes). Op. 1500 acuminata, Buprestis, De Geer, 1774, Memoires pour servir a acaroides, Sphaerius, Waltl, 1838, Isis (von Oken), 1838: 272 I'histoire des insectes, vol. 4, p. 133 (specific name of the (specific name of the type species of Sphaerius Waltl, 1838) type species of Melanophila Eschscholtz, 1829) (Coleoptera).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an Overview of the Geographical Distribution of Chewing Lice Parasitizing Chicken
    European Journal of Taxonomy 685: 1–36 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.685 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Gustafsson D.R. & Zou F. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:151B5FE7-614C-459C-8632-F8AC8E248F72 Gallancyra gen. nov. (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera), with an overview of the geographical distribution of chewing lice parasitizing chicken Daniel R. GUSTAFSSON 1,* & Fasheng ZOU 2 1 Institute of Applied Biological Resources, Xingang West Road 105, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510260, Guangdong, China. 2 Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Guangdong, China. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8D918E7D-07D5-49F4-A8D2-85682F00200C 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A0E4F4A7-CF40-4524-AAAE-60D0AD845479 Abstract. The geographical range of the typically host-specific species of chewing lice (Phthiraptera) is often assumed to be similar to that of their hosts. We tested this assumption by reviewing the published records of twelve species of chewing lice parasitizing wild and domestic chicken, one of few bird species that occurs globally. We found that of the twelve species reviewed, eight appear to occur throughout the range of the host. This includes all the species considered to be native to wild chicken, except Oxylipeurus dentatus (Sugimoto, 1934). This species has only been reported from the native range of wild chicken in Southeast Asia and from parts of Central America and the Caribbean, where the host is introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Fourth Edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences The provisions of this Code supersede those of the previous editions with effect from 1 January 2000 ISBN 0 85301 006 4 The author of this Code is the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Editorial Committee W.D.L. Ride, Chairman H.G. Cogger C. Dupuis O. Kraus A. Minelli F. C. Thompson P.K. Tubbs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise), without the prior written consent of the publisher and copyright holder. Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 c/o The Natural History Museum - Cromwell Road - London SW7 5BD - UK © International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 Explanatory Note This Code has been adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and has been ratified by the Executive Committee of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS) acting on behalf of the Union's General Assembly. The Commission may authorize official texts in any language, and all such texts are equivalent in force and meaning (Article 87). The Code proper comprises the Preamble, 90 Articles (grouped in 18 Chapters) and the Glossary. Each Article consists of one or more mandatory provisions, which are sometimes accompanied by Recommendations and/or illustrative Examples. In interpreting the Code the meaning of a word or expression is to be taken as that given in the Glossary (see Article 89).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/11/2021 08:33:28AM Via Free Access 224 E
    Contributions to Zoology, 67 (4) 223-235 (1998) SPB Academic Publishing bv, Amsterdam Optics and phylogeny: is there an insight? The evolution of superposition eyes in the Decapoda (Crustacea) Edward Gaten Department of Biology, University’ ofLeicester, Leicester LEI 7RH, U.K. E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Compound eyes, superposition optics, adaptation, evolution, decapod crustaceans, phylogeny Abstract cannot normally be predicted by external exami- nation alone, and usually microscopic investiga- This addresses the of structure and in paper use eye optics the tion of properly fixed optical elements is required construction of and crustacean phylogenies presents an hypoth- for a complete diagnosis. This largely rules out esis for the evolution of in the superposition eyes Decapoda, the use of fossil material in the based the of in comparatively on distribution eye types extant decapod fami- few lies. It that arthropodan specimens where the are is suggested reflecting superposition optics are eyes symplesiomorphic for the Decapoda, having evolved only preserved (Glaessner, 1969), although the optics once, probably in the Devonian. loss of Subsequent reflecting of some species of trilobite have been described has superposition optics occurred following the adoption of a (Clarkson & Levi-Setti, 1975). Also the require- new habitat (e.g. Aristeidae,Aeglidae) or by progenetic paedo- ment for good fixation and the fact that complete morphosis (Paguroidea, Eubrachyura). examination invariably involves the destruction of the specimen means that museum collections Introduction rarely reveal enough information to define the optics unequivocally. Where the optics of the The is one of the compound eye most complex component parts of the eye are under investiga- and remarkable not on of its fixation organs, only account tion, specialised to preserve the refrac- but also for the optical precision, diversity of tive properties must be used (Oaten, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Monitoring Report 2009/2010
    Adelaide Desalination Plant Final Intertidal Monitoring Report 2009/2010 Baring, R.J., Stewart, T. D.C. & Benkendorff, K.* School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University * Author for correspondence email: [email protected] [This document contains the final report for the seasonal Adelaide Desalination Plant Intertidal Monitoring Program undertaken by Flinders University in 2009/2010.] Table of Contents Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Aims and Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 4 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Sampling locations and sites ............................................................................................................. 5 Invertebrate abundance.................................................................................................................... 9 Percent cover of sessile organisms ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Mi Bee Lab 9-21-1990 Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera) Charles D. Michener University of Kansas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Michener, Charles D., "Classification of the Apidae (Hymenoptera)" (1990). Mi. Paper 153. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_mi/153 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Bee Lab at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 4 WWvyvlrWryrXvW-WvWrW^^ I • • •_ ••^«_«).•>.• •.*.« THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCIENC5;^ULLETIN LIBRARY Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 75-164 Sept. 21,1990 OCT 23 1990 HARVARD Classification of the Apidae^ (Hymenoptera) BY Charles D. Michener'^ Appendix: Trigona genalis Friese, a Hitherto Unplaced New Guinea Species BY Charles D. Michener and Shoichi F. Sakagami'^ CONTENTS Abstract 76 Introduction 76 Terminology and Materials 77 Analysis of Relationships among Apid Subfamilies 79 Key to the Subfamilies of Apidae 84 Subfamily Meliponinae 84 Description, 84; Larva, 85; Nest, 85; Social Behavior, 85; Distribution, 85 Relationships among Meliponine Genera 85 History, 85; Analysis, 86; Biogeography, 96; Behavior, 97; Labial palpi, 99; Wing venation, 99; Male genitalia, 102; Poison glands, 103; Chromosome numbers, 103; Convergence, 104; Classificatory questions, 104 Fossil Meliponinae 105 Meliponorytes,
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Isopods from the Hawaiian Islands (Isopoda: Oniscidea)1
    59 Terrestrial Isopods from the Hawaiian Islands (Isopoda: Oniscidea)1 STEFANO TAITI (Centro di Studio per la Faunistica ed Ecologia Tropicali del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Romana 17, 50125 Firenze, Italy) and FRANCIS G. HOWARTH (Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, PO Box 19000, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA) The following are notable new distribution records for terrestrial isopods in Hawaii. Four species are newly recorded from the state, and many new island records are given for other species, especially for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, where only one species (Porcellionides pruinosus [Brandt]) was previously known. All included records are based on specimens deposited in Bishop Museum. Taiti & Ferrara (1991) presented new distribution records and taxonomic information on 27 species and provided an overview of the terrestrial isopod fauna of the Hawaiian Islands, and Nishida (1994) list- ed all species recorded from the islands together with the island distributions of each. We call special attention to the several endemic armadillid pillbugs that have not been recollected in more than 60 years. These are Hawaiodillo danae (Dollfus) and H. sharpi (Dollfus) from Kauai, H. perkinsi (Dollfus) from Maui, Spherillo albospinosus (Dollfus) from Oahu, and S. carinulatus Budde-Lund from Kauai. In addition, S. hawai- ensis Dana, previously recorded from Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, and Lanai was last collected on the main islands in 1933 on Oahu although it appears to be still common on Nihoa. We fear some species in this complex may be extinct and encourage field biologists to watch for them in potential refugia. For economy of space, the following abbreviations are used for collectors listed be- low: DJP = David J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radical Solution: the Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae Kristen Cella1, Leila Carmona2*, Irina Ekimova3,4, Anton Chichvarkhin3,5, Dimitry Schepetov6, Terrence M. Gosliner1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia, 4 Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 5 A.V. Zhirmunsky Instutute of Marine Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia, 6 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia a11111 * [email protected] Abstract Tergipedidae represents a diverse and successful group of aeolid nudibranchs, with approx- imately 200 species distributed throughout most marine ecosystems and spanning all bio- OPEN ACCESS geographical regions of the oceans. However, the systematics of this family remains poorly Citation: Cella K, Carmona L, Ekimova I, understood since no modern phylogenetic study has been undertaken to support any of the Chichvarkhin A, Schepetov D, Gosliner TM (2016) A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the proposed classifications. The present study is the first molecular phylogeny of Tergipedidae Nudibranch Family Fionidae. PLoS ONE 11(12): based on partial sequences of two mitochondrial (COI and 16S) genes and one nuclear e0167800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167800 gene (H3). Maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis were con- Editor: Geerat J. Vermeij, University of California, ducted in order to elucidate the systematics of this family. Our results do not recover the tra- UNITED STATES ditional Tergipedidae as monophyletic, since it belongs to a larger clade that includes the Received: July 7, 2016 families Eubranchidae, Fionidae and Calmidae.
    [Show full text]
  • "Philosciidae" (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea)
    Org. Divers. Evol. 1, Electr. Suppl. 4: 1 -85 (2001) © Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik http://www.senckenberg.uni-frankfurt.de/odes/01-04.htm Phylogeny and Biogeography of South American Crinocheta, traditionally placed in the family "Philosciidae" (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea) Andreas Leistikow1 Universität Bielefeld, Abteilung für Zoomorphologie und Systematik Received 15 February 2000 . Accepted 9 August 2000. Abstract South America is diverse in climatic and thus vegetational zonation, and even the uniformly looking tropical rain forests are a mosaic of different habitats depending on the soils, the regional climate and also the geological history. An important part of the nutrient webs of the rain forests is formed by the terrestrial Isopoda, or Oniscidea, the only truly terrestrial taxon within the Crustacea. They are important, because they participate in soil formation by breaking up leaf litter when foraging on the fungi and bacteria growing on them. After a century of research on this interesting taxon, a revision of the terrestrial isopod taxa from South America and some of the Antillean Islands, which are traditionally placed in the family Philosciidae, was performed in the last years to establish monophyletic genera. Within this study, the phylogenetic relationships of these genera are elucidated in the light of phylogenetic systematics. Several new taxa are recognized, which are partially neotropical, partially also found on other continents, particularly the old Gondwanian fragments. The monophyla are checked for their distributional patterns which are compared with those patterns from other taxa from South America and some correspondence was found. The distributional patterns are analysed with respect to the evolution of the Oniscidea and also with respect to the geological history of their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to the Checklist of Scoliidae, Sphecidae, Pompilidae and Vespidae of Peru, with Notes on the Endemic Status of Some Species (Hymenoptera, Aculeata)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 519:Additions 33–48 (2015) to the checklist of Scoliidae, Sphecidae, Pompilidae and Vespidae of Peru... 33 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.519.6501 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Additions to the checklist of Scoliidae, Sphecidae, Pompilidae and Vespidae of Peru, with notes on the endemic status of some species (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) Eduardo Fernando dos Santos1, Yuri Campanholo Grandinete1,2, Fernando Barbosa Noll1 1 Departamento de Zoologia e Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Esta- dual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”. Rua Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, Jd. Nazareth, 15054-000, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil 2 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14040-901, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil Corresponding author: Eduardo Fernando dos Santos ([email protected]) Academic editor: Michael Engel | Received 22 May 2015 | Accepted 19 August 2015 | Published 31 August 2015 http://zoobank.org/DA5A298F-BEF0-4AF5-AA08-FB8FF41FE6A4 Citation: dos Santos EF, Grandinete YC, Noll FB (2015) Additions to the checklist of Scoliidae, Sphecidae, Pompilidae and Vespidae of Peru, with notes on the endemic status of some species (Hymenoptera, Aculeata). ZooKeys 519: 33–48. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.519.6501 Abstract The first checklist of the Peruvian Hymenoptera listed 1169 species and subspecies of aculeate wasps, including 173 species of Pompilidae, seven of Scoliidae, 39 of Sphecidae and 403 of Vespidae. Herein are reported 32 species as new for Peru based mainly on the collection of the Natural History Museum, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Snails of the Genus Phorcus: Biology and Ecology of Sentinel Species for Human Impacts on the Rocky Shores
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.71614 Provisional chapter Chapter 7 Marine Snails of the Genus Phorcus: Biology and MarineEcology Snails of Sentinel of the Species Genus Phorcusfor Human: Biology Impacts and on the EcologyRocky Shores of Sentinel Species for Human Impacts on the Rocky Shores Ricardo Sousa, João Delgado, José A. González, Mafalda Freitas and Paulo Henriques Ricardo Sousa, João Delgado, José A. González, MafaldaAdditional information Freitas and is available Paulo at Henriques the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71614 Abstract In this review article, the authors explore a broad spectrum of subjects associated to marine snails of the genus Phorcus Risso, 1826, namely, distribution, habitat, behaviour and life history traits, and the consequences of anthropological impacts, such as fisheries, pollution, and climate changes, on these species. This work focuses on discussing the ecological importance of these sentinel species and their interactions in the rocky shores as well as the anthropogenic impacts to which they are subjected. One of the main anthro- pogenic stresses that affect Phorcus species is fisheries. Topshell harvesting is recognized as occurring since prehistoric times and has evolved through time from a subsistence to commercial exploitation level. However, there is a gap of information concerning these species that hinders stock assessment and management required for sustainable exploi- tation. Additionally, these keystone species are useful tools in assessing coastal habitat quality, due to their eco-biological features. Contamination of these species with heavy metals carries serious risk for animal and human health due to their potential of biomag- nification in the food chain.
    [Show full text]