DOCSLIB.ORG

Gazeta Spring 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gazeta Spring 2019 FEATURES Jehuda Reinharz and The Road to September 1939 Yaacov Shavit We are pleased to present in this issue of Gazeta an essay adapted from the introduction of The Road to September 1939: Polish Jews, Zionists, and the Yishuv on the Eve of World War II by Jehuda Reinharz and Yaacov Shavit. Originally published in Hebrew by Am Oved Publishers in 2013, this translation, published by Brandeis University Press in the Tauber Institute Series for the Study of European Jewry, introduces English-speaking audiences to the important scholarship of Professors Reinharz and Shavit. The Road to September 1939 shows, through letters and memoirs, that contrary to popular belief, Zionists in the Yishuv worked tirelessly to attempt to save European Jews from Hitler in the years before World War II. As we approach the eightieth anniversary of Germany’s invasion of Poland, this book offers an opportunity for critical reflection on what was, and was not, possible Jacket image for The Road to before the storm clouds of the war fell on Europe. September 1939: Polish Jews, Zionists, and the Yishuv on the Eve of World War II by Jehuda —Gazeta Editorial Team Reinharz and Yaacov Shavit. his book serves as a sort We do not intend to everyday life, rather than on of collective diary of the big questions of the hour, Tstatesmen, social and political describe the events they bring to life this crucial activists, and ordinary people moment in Jewish history and by reading history whose first-person eyewitness illuminate more effectively accounts were recorded in backward. We have tried than some traditional histories personal diary entries, letters, the events that led up to World and memoirs, along with not to read the story from War II and the Holocaust. daily newspaper accounts. its endpoint but rather We do not intend to describe These accounts are a record the events by reading history of what they knew, thought, as much as possible in backward. We have tried not to and felt in “real time.” In their read the story from its endpoint focus on the vicissitudes of the “present.” 4 n GAZETA VOLUME 26, NO. 1 but rather as much as possible The countries of the free If in 1929 Palestine took in in the “present.” Before August less than a tenth of Jewish world had no interest 1939, as well as during that emigration from Poland, then month, no one really knew in resolving Poland’s in the years prior to the Second what was in store. It is only World War it became the a retrospective reading that internal problems by principal destination for that determines that the events opening their gates emigration. In 1935, Palestine moved inexorably toward an absorbed around 80.6 percent unequalled calamity and that to a large Jewish of the emigrants, and in 1937, it was impossible to halt their 32.2 percent. Between 1919 course. A fog of uncertainty immigration. and 1939, around 140,000 and lack of knowledge people emigrated from Poland shrouded that month. And in The reader of this book will find to Palestine—around 35 any case, even if everyone almost no German Jews in it. percent of the mandate’s total had known where history was Likewise, it will not discuss the Jewish population. During heading, they would have fate of the Jews of Romania, the mandate period, Poland been helpless to divert the Hungary, or France, for was thus the largest source ship toward a safe haven. The example. The choice to focus of immigration to Palestine processes that preceded the on Polish Jews seems obvious and the main source of the breakout of the Second World to us. Poland was home to the Yishuv’s demographic growth. War have been reconstructed largest Jewish population in the In addition, a large part of and analyzed in numerous world—around 3.5 million Jews the private capital that was books, some of them recording in 1939—and after 1924, it imported to Palestine belonged and reconstructing the behind- was the main source of Jewish to Polish Jews, who made a the-scenes occurrences that emigration across the Atlantic considerable contribution to were unknown to people at the and to Palestine. From 1929 the national funds. time. The history of the Jewish to 1938, more than 400,000 In the middle of the 1930s, as people, the Zionist movement, Jews left Poland. Initially, most the pressure to leave Poland and the Yishuv, the Jewish of them went to the United grew and Palestine became the community in Palestine prior States, but from 1924 onward almost exclusive destination, to the establishment of the the rate of those immigrating to the British government State of Israel in 1948, in the Palestine increased. Between imposed new restrictions 1930s have been the subjects 1929 and 1935, Palestine on Jewish immigration. As of an extensive body of absorbed around 43.7 percent a result, the country’s gates literature. This book could of the total Jewish emigration, were shut to many who not have been written without whereas the United States wanted to immigrate to it. consulting it. absorbed 10.9 percent. The Zionist movement and GAZETA SPRING 2019 n 5 its institutions had to lay the Polish Jews had a This led to the conclusion that bridge on which at least some it would be possible to spur the rich and multifaceted Polish Jews would cross over governments and the world’s to Palestine. The Yishuv’s existence as an integral conscience to see finding a political future and its power solution for the Jews’ plight were now intertwined with part of Polish life and as a lofty conscientious duty. the fate of Polish Jews. The under its influence. The This was also accompanied fate of Polish Jews, however, by a belief that the power as opposed to the fate of shadow of a possible war of the Jewish world could German Jews and later that weighed on them without not be reduced to its plight. of Jews under the Third Weizmann, however, did Reich, was not on the public being necessarily tied to not mean that putting the and international agenda. It the future of the Jewish subject of Jewish emigration did not occupy any place in on the international agenda British or international policy Yishuv in Palestine, and would include alternatives to considerations, because Polish Palestine. He—and others— even in isolation from it. Jews had not been expelled believed that when it would and therefore did not become become clear that there wrote to Moshe Shertok asylum-seeking refugees. The were no such alternatives, (Sharett), director of the Jewish countries of the free world Palestine’s status as the Agency’s political department, had no interest in resolving only destination would be that Poland had put the Poland’s internal problems by reinforced. question of Jewish emigration opening their gates to a large from Eastern Europe on the However, it would be a Jewish immigration. international agenda: “The mistake to describe the history The Zionist movement found recent pronouncements of of Polish Jews between the two itself in a difficult dilemma. the Poles have made a very world wars only from a Zionist On the one hand, putting great impression. The Polish or a Palestinian perspective. the need for Jewish problem transcends the Most of the Jews in Poland emigration from Poland on ordinary boundaries and makes were not Zionists, and many of the international agenda was it patent to everybody that our them opposed Zionism or were welcomed. On the other hand, misfortunes will soon grow indifferent to it. Nor did many directing this emigration to to a first-rate international Zionists show an urgency or different countries in Africa calamity for which we cannot eagerness to immigrate to or South America meant take responsibility and which Palestine. Polish Jews had a that Zionism would become may affect vitally the state of rich and multifaceted existence irrelevant. In October 1936, affairs in the East and South as an integral part of Polish for example, Chaim Weizmann East Europe.” life and under its influence. 6 n GAZETA VOLUME 26, NO. 1 The shadow of a possible war The research literature, publicly and behind closed weighed on them without being and even more so the doors, stirring up the debate necessarily tied to the future of and creating polarization. Plans the Jewish Yishuv in Palestine, political and public can testify to the sense of time and even in isolation from it. and to a will to act. But they debate, have been do not indicate that those who At the end of a dinner held suffused for over fifty thought up the plans had the on February 22, 1938, at the power and the means to carry house of Leopold Amery, years with a bitter them out. As will become the Secretary of State for apparent in the narrative Dominion Affairs from 1924 disagreement around the that follows, individuals to 1929, Ben-Gurion told Sir question to what extent and organizations within the Harold MacMichael, who was Zionist movement feared for appointed High Commissioner Jews in general, and the the fate of the Jews of Europe for Palestine in 1938 (and held political leadership of and did what they could within the position until 1944), that the fog of uncertainty and with the Zionist movement wanted the Zionist movement in limited resources. Once the “to save the young generation particular, were aware war broke out, however, the of Eastern and Central fate of European Jewry was European Jewry—and it’s that time was pressing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stephen S. Wise and Golda Meir: Zionism, Israel, and American Power in the Twentieth Century
    Stephen S. Wise and Golda Meir: Zionism, Israel, and American Power in the Twentieth Century Mark A. Raider* In his seminal study, The Idea of the Jewish State (1969), the historian Ben Halpern observes: “Israel, the Jewish state, is, of course, the child of Zionism.”1 Situating Zionism in the context of other modern nationalist struggles, Halpern argues that Jewish nationalism, notwithstanding its particular and even pecu- liar characteristics, is something of a cousin to other ethnic forms of national expression that arose in the mid- to late nineteenth century. The campaign for Jewish statehood, he further explains, was not only dependent on a variety of objective conditions and factors, but also on the capacity of emerging lead- ers to navigate a generally precarious and hostile global arena. The latter fun- damental political reality, Jehuda Reinharz argues, has, since Theodor Herzl, prompted Zionism’s strategy of forging a necessary link to a great power. It has also shaped the “historical dimensions” of the Zionist movement, the Yishuv (the pre-state Jewish community in Palestine), and contemporary Israeli soci- ety, while imbuing relations with the “great powers” with “a quasi-ideological significance.”2 Though Britain played a dominant role in Zionist policy mak- ing by the eve of World War i, and thereafter controlled Palestine until 1947, in this period the United States assumed an increasingly significant role in determining Zionism’s trajectory. In due course, as David Biale observes, the Zionist cause “transformed the nature of American Jewish politics,” and after the establishment of the Jewish state in 1948, “precisely because Israel [was] forced to become a major military power, American Jews [became] a direct party to superpower geopolitics” in the Middle East.3 Building on the foregoing important and useful observations, the present study reconsiders the cases of two towering historical figures who straddled the pre- and post-state periods: Stephen S.
    [Show full text]
  • Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-Hatredonthe World Wide Web
    MonikaSchwarz-Friesel “Antisemitism 2.0”—The Spreading of Jew-hatredonthe World Wide Web This article focuses on the rising problem of internet antisemitism and online ha- tred against Israel. Antisemitism 2.0isfound on all webplatforms, not justin right-wing social media but alsoonthe online commentary sections of quality media and on everydayweb pages. The internet shows Jew‐hatred in all its var- ious contemporary forms, from overt death threats to more subtle manifestations articulated as indirect speech acts. The spreading of antisemitic texts and pic- tures on all accessibleaswell as seemingly non-radical platforms, their rapid and multiple distribution on the World Wide Web, adiscourse domain less con- trolled than other media, is by now acommon phenomenon within the spaceof public online communication. As aresult,the increasingimportance of Web2.0 communication makes antisemitism generallymore acceptable in mainstream discourse and leadstoanormalization of anti-Jewishutterances. Empirical results from alongitudinalcorpus studyare presented and dis- cussed in this article. They show how centuries old anti-Jewish stereotypes are persistentlyreproducedacross different social strata. The data confirm that hate speech against Jews on online platforms follows the pattern of classical an- tisemitism. Although manyofthem are camouflaged as “criticism of Israel,” they are rooted in the ancient and medieval stereotypes and mental models of Jew hostility.Thus, the “Israelization of antisemitism,”¹ the most dominant manifes- tation of Judeophobia today, proves to be merelyanew garb for the age-old Jew hatred. However,the easy accessibility and the omnipresenceofantisemitism on the web 2.0enhancesand intensifies the spreadingofJew-hatred, and its prop- agation on social media leads to anormalization of antisemitic communication, thinking,and feeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Weizmann Magazine, Spring 2021
    COVID-19 Research Highlights 15 Updates from the Moross Integrated Cancer Center 24 Q&A with International Board Chair Cathy Beck 34 למדע ויצמן מכון ויצמן למדע 13 46 NEW SCIENTISTS UPDATE ON THE FLAGSHIPS MAGAZINE MAGAZINE WEIZMANN MAGAZINE A publication of the Department of Resource WEIZMANN WEIZMANN Development Healing what ails the Earth The new nerve center for neuroscience EDITORIAL STAFF Prof. Roee Ozeri, Vice President for Resource Development Tamar Levine, Director, Department of Resource 6 15 Development SCIENCE BRIEFS COVER STORY Tamar Morad, Head, Donor Communications Maria Yakhnin, Visual and Digital Production TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE Yarden Jaron, Visual and Digital Production EDITOR Tamar Morad The vaccines are here, and research abounds COPYEDITOR Sharon Reinheimer 20 SCIENCE FEATURES From the President WRITING STAFF Sandy Cash Jennifer Racz Dear Friends, Dinah Elashvili Anne Sperling The one-year mark of the COVID-19 pandemic has passed Tali Galsky Edward Truitt and here in Israel, where the rate of vaccination is the highest in the world, we are starting to see the light at the end of the With thanks to the Department tunnel. Our thoughts are with our many friends around the of Communications world; this is a network which keeps the Institute strong and The anthropocene is upon us Rx for the ocean thriving. DONOR RECOGNITION Coronavirus-related research on campus is bounding Daphna Freeman ahead, and we expect a range of insights from this virus to play Irit Oz a starring role in fending off future pandemics and broaden- 28 34 Ayelet Rais SPOTLIGHT ON Q&A SCIENCE BRIEFS ing our understanding of the immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to September 1939 Review
    Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs ISSN: 2373-9770 (Print) 2373-9789 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rifa20 The Road to September 1939: Polish Jews, Zionists, and the Yishuv on the Eve of World War II Alexander J. Groth To cite this article: Alexander J. Groth (2019): The Road to September 1939: Polish Jews, Zionists, and the Yishuv on the Eve of World War II, Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, DOI: 10.1080/23739770.2019.1610225 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2019.1610225 Published online: 23 May 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rifa20 Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2019.1610225 The Road to September 1939: Polish Jews, Zionists, and the Yishuv on the Eve of World War II by Yaacov Shavit and Jehuda Reinharz translated by Michal Sapir (Waltham: Brandeis University Press/UPNE, 2018), 432 pages Reviewed by Alexander J. Groth Professor Emeritus of Political Science, University of California, Davis The authors of this study are Jehuda Reinharz, Richard Koret Professor of Modern Jewish History at Brandeis University, and Yaacov Shavit, professor emeritus at the Department of Jewish History, Tel Aviv University. They have previously co-authored two books: Darwin and His Circle (2009) and Glorious Accursed Europe: An Essay on Jewish Ambivalence (2010). They and their translator, Michal Sapir, are to be commended for delivering a very absorbing account of one of the most fateful periods in modern history.
    [Show full text]
  • Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies
    Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies Understanding the Israel Fellows Program: Program Theory and Implementation Challenges Fern Chertok Annette Koren February 2014 Understanding the Israel Fellows Program: © 2014 Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies The Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, founded in 1980, is dedicated to providing independent, high quality research on issues related to contemporary Jewish life. The Cohen Center is also the home of the Steinhardt Social Research Institute (SSRI). Established in 2005, SSRI uses innovative research methods to collect and analyze socio-demographic data on the Jewish community. iii Program Theory and Implementation Challenges Acknowledgments Support for this research was provided by the Jewish Agency for Israel. We appreciate the advice and support of Aviva Zeltzer-Zubida, Ronen Weiss, and the Israel Fellows Program staff at JAFI as well as Abigail Dauber-Sterne at Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Our work also benefited from the assistance of our colleagues, including Joshua Davidson, Ariel Stein, Masha Lokshin, Deborah Grant, and Chelsea Norman at the Cohen Center. We wish to thank the Israel Fellows and their supervisors and Hillel colleagues who took the time to share their thoughts with us through interviews. i Understanding the Israel Fellows Program: ii Program Theory and Implementation Challenges Table of Contents List of Tables .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Zionism to Asia: Texts and Tactics of Colonial Settlement, Formatted: Font: Bold
    14. <CN>14.</> <CT>Moving Zionism to Asia: Texts and Tactics of Colonial Settlement, Formatted: Font: Bold 1917–1921</> <AU>Elizabeth F. Thompsonn</> <CO>As a historian of the modern Middle East, I welcome Derek Penslar’s effort to “plac[e] Zionism in Asia.”1 First, he argues that Zionism as practiced in West Asia (Palestine) was not true settlement- colonialism, because settlers were not citizens of the colonial power ruling the territory (Britain). Then he turns to South Asia and to cultural analysis to argue that European Zionism shared similar roots and ideological values with Indian anti-colonial nationalism. On these bases, Penslar concludes that Zionists cannot be considered fully colonialist until after they founded the state State of Israel in 1948.</> My critique focuses on two related points. The first considers the argument’s key methodological pivot, Penslar’s distinction between practice and discourse, between sociology and history, and between sensibility and structure. His structural analysis of Zionism in Palestine remains distinct from his discourse analysis of Jewish nationalist writing in Europe. This spatial separation of method introduces critical distortions to Penslar’s presentation of Zionism in Palestine. If we look at what Zionists both said and did in Palestine before 1948, we find little European anti-colonialism and an intimate alliance of settlers with the British mandatory (colonial) state. My second point addresses the problematic limits to Penslar’s move of Zionism into West Asia. Colonialism is generally understood as a relationship; —that is, the institutionalization of practices that perpetuate the subordination of one people to another in a differentiated space.2 Penslar, however, neglects the other half of the Zionists’ encounter in 513 Palestine: the indigenous peoples, including Arabic-speaking Jews, Muslims, and Christians.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Jewish History
    The Jewish World in the Modern Era Professor Robert Rockaway Fall Semester 2019 Office: 204 Carter Building Office hours by appointment [email protected] [email protected] COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is an introductory survey of the major currents in Jewish culture and society from the late eighteenth century to the present and presupposes no previous background in modern Jewish history. The course focuses on the history of the Jews in Europe, with an emphasis on Central and Eastern Europe and also includes lectures on major themes in American Jewish history. Topics include the social consequences of emancipation, the emergence of modern varieties of Judaism; the rise of modern anti- Semitism; Zionism, the Holocaust, and the establishment of the State of Israel. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: The course consists of lectures, readings, and selected documents. The readings are taken from the following books: Lloyd P. Gartner, History of the Jews in Modern Times (2001) Howard M. Sachar, The Course of Modern Jewish History (1990) H.H. Ben-Sasson, editor, A History of the Jewish People (1976) Gerald Sorin, Tradition Transformed: The Jewish Experience in America (1997) Students will also read a number of primary documents. The assigned readings and documents are listed under the topic headings. The documents are taken from The Jews in the Modern World: A Documentary History, 3rd edition, edited by Paul Mendes-Flohr and Jehuda Reinharz (2011) Research Paper: Each student will be required to write a research paper on any subject, theme, topic or period covered in the readings from week 5 to Week 12.
    [Show full text]
  • The Memorial Inscription from the Bimah of the Great Synagogue of Vilna
    Article Between Yerushalayim DeLita and Jerusalem— The Memorial Inscription from the Bimah of the Great Synagogue of Vilna Jon Seligman Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem 91004, Israel; [email protected] Received: 19 February 2020; Accepted: 18 March 2020; Published: 1 April 2020 Abstract: During excavations of the bimah (the platform for reading the Torah) of the 17th-century Great Synagogue of Vilna (Vilnius, Lithuania), an important memorial inscription was exposed. This paper describes the new finds associated with the baroque-rococo architecture of the bimah and focuses on the inscription and its meaning. The Hebrew inscription, engraved on a large stone slab, is a complex rabbinic text filled with biblical allusions, symbolism, gematria, and abbreviations. The text describes the donation of a Torah reading table in 1796 in honour of R. Ḥayim ben Ḥayim and of Sarah by their sons, R. Eliezer and Shmuel. The inscription notes the aliyah (emigration) of Ḥayim and Sarah to Eretz Israel, the Land of Israel. The interpretation of the inscription shows the use of multiple messianic motifs. Historical analysis identifies the involvement of the Vilna community with the support of the Yishuv (the Jewish community in Ottoman Palestine) and the aliyah of senior scholars and community leaders at the end of the 18th and early 19th centuries. Amongst these figures were Ḥayim ben Ḥayim and Sarah, with Ḥayim ben Ḥayim going on to represent the Vilna community in the Land of Israel as its emissary, distributing charitable donations to the scholarly Ashkenazi community resident in Tiberias, Safed, and later Jerusalem. Keywords: Vilna/Vilnius; synagogue; bimah; inscription; Jerusalem; aliyah Over the past five years (2016–2019), a consortium of researchers 1 has been conducting archaeological research on the site of the Great Synagogue and Shulhoyf (synagogue courtyard) of Vilna (present-day Vilnius in Lithuania).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Political Science
    1 University of Toronto Department of Political Science POL 381 H1 (F) Topics in Political Theory: Zionism: Between Secular Ideology and Religious Redemption Thursday 12:00 – 2:00 Room: UC 163 Instructor: Merom Kalie Office hours: Thursday 2:30 - 4:30 pm, room SS3118 Email: [email protected] Course description: The course will examine different perspectives on the relationships between Zionism - the Jewish national movement - and the Jewish religion. It will discuss a range of views, from those who perceive Zionism to be a secular movement that defied tradition and religion, to those who perceive Zionism in religious and Messianic terms. During the first half of the course, we will discuss the evolution of the subject from the origins of the Zionist movement to the establishment of the state of Israel and the Six Days War. In the second half of the course, we will discuss current views about the subject and its implications for contemporary Israeli society and the Israeli-Arab conflict. Course requirements: th 1. One short paper, due on October 17P ,P 2013 (maximum 1250 words, 20% of the final mark). th 2. One research paper, due on November 14P ,P 2013 (maximum 2500 words, 40% of the final mark). A list of suggested topics together with detailed instructions will be posted. You are welcome to write your research paper about a topic that is not on the list, with the instructor’s approval in advance. 3. A final exam, at a date to be determined by the Faculty of Arts and Science (40% of the final mark).
    [Show full text]
  • Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women
    Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, publishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fi lls major gaps in Jewish tudiesS and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women is supported by a generous gift from Dr. Laura S. Schor. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com Sharon Faye Koren, Forsaken: Th e Menstruant in Medieval Jewish Mysticism Sonja M. Hedgepeth and Rochelle G. Saidel, editors, Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust Julia R. Lieberman, editor, Sephardi Family Life in the Early Modern Diaspora Derek Rubin, editor, Promised Lands: New Jewish American Fiction on Longing and Belonging Carol K. Ingall, editor, Th e Women Who Reconstructed American Jewish Education: 1910–1965 Gaby Brimmer and Elena Poniatowska, Gaby Brimmer: An Autobiography in Th ree Voices Harriet Hartman and Moshe Hartman, Gender and American Jews: Patt erns in Work, Education, and Family in Contemporary Life Dvora E. Weisberg, Levirate Marriage and the Family in Ancient Judaism Ellen M. Umansky and Dianne Ashton, editors, Four Centuries of Jewish Women’s Spirituality: A Sourcebook Carole S. Kessner, Marie Syrkin: Values Beyond the Self Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem,
    [Show full text]
  • Gershom Biography an Intellectual Scholem from Berlin to Jerusalem and Back Gershom Scholem
    noam zadoff Gershom Biography An Intellectual Scholem From Berlin to Jerusalem and Back gershom scholem The Tauber Institute Series for the Study of European Jewry Jehuda Reinharz, General Editor ChaeRan Y. Freeze, Associate Editor Sylvia Fuks Fried, Associate Editor Eugene R. Sheppard, Associate Editor The Tauber Institute Series is dedicated to publishing compelling and innovative approaches to the study of modern European Jewish history, thought, culture, and society. The series features scholarly works related to the Enlightenment, modern Judaism and the struggle for emancipation, the rise of nationalism and the spread of antisemitism, the Holocaust and its aftermath, as well as the contemporary Jewish experience. The series is published under the auspices of the Tauber Institute for the Study of European Jewry —established by a gift to Brandeis University from Dr. Laszlo N. Tauber —and is supported, in part, by the Tauber Foundation and the Valya and Robert Shapiro Endowment. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com Noam Zadoff Gershom Scholem: From Berlin to Jerusalem and Back *Monika Schwarz-Friesel and Jehuda Reinharz Inside the Antisemitic Mind: The Language of Jew-Hatred in Contemporary Germany Elana Shapira Style and Seduction: Jewish Patrons, Architecture, and Design in Fin de Siècle Vienna ChaeRan Y. Freeze, Sylvia Fuks Fried, and Eugene R. Sheppard, editors The Individual in History: Essays in Honor of Jehuda Reinharz Immanuel Etkes Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liady: The Origins of Chabad Hasidism *Robert Nemes and Daniel Unowsky, editors Sites of European Antisemitism in the Age of Mass Politics, 1880–1918 Sven-Erik Rose Jewish Philosophical Politics in Germany, 1789–1848 ChaeRan Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Aviad Rubin Fall 2017 [email protected] Tuesday 12:00-14:00
    Professor Aviad Rubin Fall 2017 [email protected] Tuesday 12:00-14:00 Religion and State in Israel and the Middle East Theoretical, empirical and comparative aspects Outline - The State of Israel represents a unique model of the state-religion relationship. On the one hand, since its independence Israel has challenged the dominant idea of separation between religion and state and instead granted the Jewish religion (alongside other minority religions) significant multidimensional recognition in the public and political spheres. On the other hand, the Israeli regime contains some crucial secular elements, including secular public education system, legal code and judiciary system. This course will explore different aspects of the Israeli model of religion and the state, its foundations, theoretical implications and applicability to other societies and religions. The first section will introduce basic theoretical concepts in the study of religion and the state. The second, most substantive section, will discuss the historical development and contemporary characteristics of the state-religion regime in Israel. The third section will be comparative in nature and examine recent political transitions in the Middle East, the role of religion in these transitions, and the ability of the Israeli case to serve as a role model for the state-religion relationships in emerging Arab regimes. Course Assignments (elaborate details and Q&A about the assignments will be provided in class). 1. Attendance and active participation in class discussions – 20/100 (Students are required to read all the reading materials, come prepared to class and take part in class discussions) 2. Two weekly reviews of reading assignments (up to 1000 words each) – 30/100 points (15 points each).
    [Show full text]