DOCSLIB.ORG

Jacoway, Paul Accepted Dissertation 07-31-14 SU 14

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jacoway, Paul Accepted Dissertation 07-31-14 SU 14 Are Documentaries Journalism? The Gap Between a Shared Truth and Verification A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Paul R. Jacoway August 2014 © 2014 Paul R. Jacoway. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Are Documentaries Journalism? The Gap between a Shared Truth and Verification by PAUL R. JACOWAY has been approved for the E. W. Scripps School of Journalism and the Scripps College of Communication by Michael S. Sweeney Professor of Journalism Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract JACOWAY, PAUL R.,, Ph.D., August 2014, Mass Communication - Journalism Are Documentaries Journalism? The Gap between a Shared Truth and Verification Director of Dissertation: Michael S. Sweeney This dissertation examines to what extent the most popular documentaries as ranked by Netflix conform to the principles of journalism as defined by Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, vs. the shared truth of the documentary filmmaker as defined by narrative inquiry theory. Fifteen of the most popular documentaries were viewed twice in their entirety. Time-code was noted to mark events and sequences of the narrative for the sake of reference and comparison. They were selected from the documentary categories used by Netflix that most parallel the documentary categories of history, propaganda, art, style, entertainment, biography, and politics or dissident message, which have appeared as the most common categories in the literature. Qualitative analysis found that political documentaries were the most closely associated with a shared truth, while biographical and historical documentaries were most closely associated with journalistic standards. If documentary filmmakers edit fairly, such as by providing clear identification of speakers and sources, offering the facts and voices of more than one side, verifying their facts and claims, stating their premises clearly, and leaving the conclusion open to the viewer, then they are an example of a high level of verification associated with journalism. iii Dedication To my father, Benjamin Jones Jacoway. iv Acknowledgments I would like to thank Dr. Michael S. Sweeney and my committee, Dr. Aimee Edmondson, Dr. Joseph Slade, and Dr. Katherine Jellison, for being a searchlight on my horizon. I also would like to thank E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Director Robert K. Stewart. v Table of Contents Page Abstract .............................................................................................................................. iii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Literature Review and Theory .......................................................................... 8 Chapter 3: Ken Burns, Historian or Revisionist? .............................................................. 32 Chapter 4: Hillary: The Movie, Documentary or Propaganda? ........................................ 57 Chapter 5: Methods ........................................................................................................... 79 Chapter 6: Results ............................................................................................................. 89 Chapter 7: Discussion and Conclusion ........................................................................... 176 Bibliography: .................................................................................................................. 190 Appendix: Notes on Documentary Content ................................................................... 197 vi Chapter 1: Introduction The Metro Goldwyn Mayer Logo appears on the screen, with the famous lion and its iconic roar. The credibility offered by the image offers a sense of security, believability, and reliability. After the opening title and studio credits of the film, a single slide appears. “The following documentary would like to give special thanks to Dr. Eudora Fletcher, Paul Deghuce, and Mrs. Meryl Fletcher Varney.” The first quote offered, credited to Susan Sontag, appears in a lower third over a ticker tape parade in Times Square: “He was the phenomenon of the ’20s, when you think at that time he was as well known as Lindbergh, it really is quit astonishing.” Other quotes follow. Credited to Irving Howe: “His story reflected the nature of our civilization, the character of our times, yet it was also one man’s story, and all of the symbols of our culture were there. Heroism, will, things like that. But when you look back on it, it was very strange.” Credited to Saul Bellow: “Well, it is ironic to see how quickly he has faded from memory, considering what an astounding record he made. He was of course very amusing, and at times could touch a nerve of people, perhaps in a way that they didn’t prefer to be touched. It certainly is a very bizarre story.” The film is Zelig, a work of fiction by American writer and director Woody Allen, a story of the chameleon character, Leonard Zelig. The narrator goes on to describe the climate of America in the 1920s and the opening scene at a party at F. Scott Fitzgerald’s. 1 It is obviously a satire on the documentary style, which has developed some traditional canons of narrative style, and Allen uses his cinematic talents as a writer and director to make Zelig a very believable spoof.1 The problem is that the same believability of onscreen images is possible with today’s digital and financial toolbox to create a production in a very credible and professional package. And that package can be intended for a specific audience. The differences between claimed facts and shared truths may be undetectable, without further study. This dissertation will investigate a purposive sample of the most popular documentaries on Netflix, the online movie streaming service, correlating the storytelling techniques of documentary filmmakers with measures and principles of traditional journalism. It will qualitatively examine the content of these documentaries, as measured by such canons of journalism as fact, objectivity and verification, and it will do so through the lens of narrative inquiry theory. It will examine whether the sampled documentaries fit with the terms of journalism, propaganda, history, entertainment, etc. It will examine the producers, topics, voices, actors, arguments, evidence, and findings of the documentaries studied. Bill Kovach and Tom Rosenstiel, veteran journalists and authors, created a reality check system that will be the basis for this dissertation. Their ten-point rating scale on the level of verification has become a standard in teaching journalism classes and also during this age of media convergence. For clarity, it will be important to establish definitions of a documentary and the relative terms of this study. 1 Zelig, directed by Woody Allen, DVD (Fox Searchlight, 2001). 2 The word “documentary” is described by documentary historian Jeffrey Geiger as referring to “cinematic forms that haven’t always fit comfortably within stricter definitions of the term. ‘Film’, similarly, serves as shorthand for motion picture techniques ranging from celluloid to video and digital technologies.”2 Geiger focuses on how films can add to national identity and reviews state actors who implemented the documentary style as works of propaganda. “Films, with the discourses that surround them and the institutions that support them, are central means through which the idea of the national is articulated and culturally determined.”3 He particularly studied the propaganda documentaries of the Second World War and how they managed “division and dissent.”4 His research shows that what one audience may take as the trusted word of documentary could be viewed as pandering by the producer or sponsoring organization. Film historian Susan Hayward said, “Like national affiliations themselves, films and filmic discourses are selective: they can mobilize, promote and also suppress key ideas and myths of the nation.”5 This confusion can be directly linked to the narrative of the documentary. Does it have information that can be verified or is preaching to the choir, or speaking to an audience that has shared values and a shared truth. Some thirty years after the term “documentary” appeared, Cecil Starr of the Saturday Review complained in 1954 that the documentary not having a proper definition is “an irritation among film- minded people, and the repeated demand for a definition.”6 2 Jeffrey Geiger, American Documentary Film: Projecting the Nation (Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press, 2011) 2. 3 Ibid, 3. 4 Ibid. 5 Susan Hayward, French National Cinema (London; Routledge, 2005) 6-8. 6 Geiger, American Documentary Film, 5. 3 John Grierson, a respected theorist of narrative and documentary, reflected on the role of the documentary and verification. Grierson stresses the creative role of the documentarian and how it can conflict with any form of verification. By trying to be “cinematic,” the documentarian can go beyond clearly stating the facts of the researched and archival material without intending any form of creative license through “arrangements,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nomination Press Release
    Elisabeth Moss as Peggy Olson Outstanding Lead Actor In A Drama Series Nashville • ABC • ABC Studios Connie Britton as Rayna James Breaking Bad • AMC • Sony Pictures Television Scandal • ABC • ABC Studios Bryan Cranston as Walter White Kerry Washington as Olivia Pope Downton Abbey • PBS • A Carnival / Masterpiece Co-Production Hugh Bonneville as Robert, Earl of Grantham Outstanding Lead Actor In A Homeland • Showtime • Showtime Presents, Miniseries Or A Movie Teakwood Lane Productions, Cherry Pie Behind The Candelabra • HBO • Jerry Productions, Keshet, Fox 21 Weintraub Productions in association with Damian Lewis as Nicholas Brody HBO Films House Of Cards • Netflix • Michael Douglas as Liberace Donen/Fincher/Roth and Trigger Street Behind The Candelabra • HBO • Jerry Productions, Inc. in association with Media Weintraub Productions in association with Rights Capital for Netflix HBO Films Kevin Spacey as Francis Underwood Matt Damon as Scott Thorson Mad Men • AMC • Lionsgate Television The Girl • HBO • Warner Bros. Jon Hamm as Don Draper Entertainment, GmbH/Moonlighting and BBC in association with HBO Films and Wall to The Newsroom • HBO • HBO Entertainment Wall Media Jeff Daniels as Will McAvoy Toby Jones as Alfred Hitchcock Parade's End • HBO • A Mammoth Screen Production, Trademark Films, BBC Outstanding Lead Actress In A Worldwide and Lookout Point in association Drama Series with HBO Miniseries and the BBC Benedict Cumberbatch as Christopher Tietjens Bates Motel • A&E • Universal Television, Carlton Cuse Productions and Kerry Ehrin
    [Show full text]
  • Hamptons Doc Fest 2020 Congratulations on 13 Years of Championing Documentary Films!
    Art: Nofa Aji Zatmiko ALL DOCS ALL DAY DOCS ALL ALL OPENING NIGHT FILM: MLK/FBI Hamptons Doc Fest DECEMBER 4–13, 2020 www.hamptonsdocfest.com is a year we will long Wiseman and his newest film, City Hall. 2020 rememberWELCOME or want LETTER to He stands as one of the documentary forget. Deprived of a movie theater’s giants that every aspiring filmmaker magic we struggled to take the virtual learns from, that Wiseman way of plunge. Ultimately, we decided on yes observing life unfold. Our Award films we can to bring you our 13th festival capture the essence of Art & Music, in these overwhelming times. We Human Rights, and the Environment. programmed 35 great documentary Our Opening night film reveals a hidden films to watch in the warmth and chapter in Martin Luther King’s world. comfort of your home over 10 days. No New this year, you’ll hear and see UP worries about weather, parking, ticket CLOSE video clips presented by the lines, where to catch a snack between Directors of each film. My thanks to an films. You can schedule your own day extraordinary team, and to our Artistic the way you like it. Consider it not Director, Karen Arikian. Lastly, you will only a festival experience but a virtual find all the information and help you’ll festival experiment. need to watch films on your television, When Covid hit, Hamptons Doc Fest tablet or computer. So click on and went into overdrive. We were forced step into the big virtual world wherever to cancel our Docs Equinox Spring you are.
    [Show full text]
  • Debunking Gasland, Part II
    Debunking Gasland, Part II Steve Team Lead Three years after the release of Gasland – a film panned by independent observers as “fundamentally dishonest” and a “polemic” – the main challenge for director Josh Fox in releasing Gasland Part II was manifest: Regain the public’s trust by discarding hyperbole and laying out the challenges and opportunities of shale development as they actually exist in the actual world. In short, do everything a documentary filmmaker should do, but which he chose not to do in Gasland. Unfortunately for those who attended the premiere of Gasland Part II this past weekend (we were there), Josh eschewed that path entirely, doubling down on the same old, tired talking points, and playing to his narrow base at the exclusion of all others. The Parker County case? It’s in there. Dimock? Probably receives more focus than anything else. Pavillion and EPA? You bet. And yes, that damned banjo of his makes an appearance or two as well. This isn’t Gasland Part II, folks. It’s Gasland Too. Sure, the sequel has some new cast members and a few new claims. Somehow, Fox discovers that shale is actually worse than he previously thought: Earthquakes. Methane leaks. Well failures. Hurricanes. Heck, viewers were probably waiting for swarms of locusts to appear – fracking locusts, to be sure. And there was plenty of spectacle, too. Yoko Ono was in the audience. So was former Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-N.Y.), the congressman who lent his name to the infamous “FRAC Act” that Josh so desperately wants to become law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003
    THE REGIME CHANGE CONSENSUS: IRAQ IN AMERICAN POLITICS, 1990-2003 Joseph Stieb A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Sciences. Chapel Hill 2019 Approved by: Wayne Lee Michael Morgan Benjamin Waterhouse Daniel Bolger Hal Brands ©2019 Joseph David Stieb ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joseph David Stieb: The Regime Change Consensus: Iraq in American Politics, 1990-2003 (Under the direction of Wayne Lee) This study examines the containment policy that the United States and its allies imposed on Iraq after the 1991 Gulf War and argues for a new understanding of why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003. At the core of this story is a political puzzle: Why did a largely successful policy that mostly stripped Iraq of its unconventional weapons lose support in American politics to the point that the policy itself became less effective? I argue that, within intellectual and policymaking circles, a claim steadily emerged that the only solution to the Iraqi threat was regime change and democratization. While this “regime change consensus” was not part of the original containment policy, a cohort of intellectuals and policymakers assembled political support for the idea that Saddam’s personality and the totalitarian nature of the Baathist regime made Iraq uniquely immune to “management” strategies like containment. The entrenchment of this consensus before 9/11 helps explain why so many politicians, policymakers, and intellectuals rejected containment after 9/11 and embraced regime change and invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Sundance Institute Presents Institute Sundance U.S
    1 Check website or mobile app for full description and content information. description app for full Check website or mobile #sundance • sundance.org/festival sundance.org/festival Sundance Institute Presents Institute Sundance The U.S. Dramatic Competition Films As You Are The Birth of a Nation U.S. Dramatic Competition Dramatic U.S. Many of these films have not yet been rated by the Motion Picture Association of America. Read the full descriptions online and choose responsibly. Films are generally followed by a Q&A with the director and selected members of the cast and crew. All films are shown in 35mm, DCP, or HDCAM. Special thanks to Dolby Laboratories, Inc., for its support of our U.S.A., 2016, 110 min., color U.S.A., 2016, 117 min., color digital cinema projection. As You Are is a telling and retelling of a Set against the antebellum South, this story relationship between three teenagers as it follows Nat Turner, a literate slave and traces the course of their friendship through preacher whose financially strained owner, PROGRAMMERS a construction of disparate memories Samuel Turner, accepts an offer to use prompted by a police investigation. Nat’s preaching to subdue unruly slaves. Director, Associate Programmers Sundance Film Festival Lauren Cioffi, Adam Montgomery, After witnessing countless atrocities against 2 John Cooper Harry Vaughn fellow slaves, Nat devises a plan to lead his DIRECTOR: Miles Joris-Peyrafitte people to freedom. Director of Programming Shorts Programmers SCREENWRITERS: Miles Joris-Peyrafitte, Trevor Groth Dilcia Barrera, Emily Doe, Madison Harrison Ernesto Foronda, Jon Korn, PRINCIPAL CAST: Owen Campbell, DIRECTOR/SCREENWRITER: Nate Parker Senior Programmers Katie Metcalfe, Lisa Ogdie, Charlie Heaton, Amandla Stenberg, PRINCIPAL CAST: Nate Parker, David Courier, Shari Frilot, Adam Piron, Mike Plante, Kim Yutani, John Scurti, Scott Cohen, Armie Hammer, Aja Naomi King, Caroline Libresco, John Nein, Landon Zakheim Mary Stuart Masterson Jackie Earle Haley, Gabrielle Union, Mike Plante, Charlie Reff, Kim Yutani Mark Boone Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Review: Hillary and Clinton | Second Thought Theatre | Bryant Hall
    Review: Hillary and Clinton | Second Thought Theatre | Bryant Hall theaterjones.com/ntx/reviews/20180115152423/2018-01-15/Second-Thought-Theatre/Hillary-and-Clinton Teresa January 14, 2018 Marrero Photo: Karen Almond Stormi Demerson and Barry Nash in Hillary and Clinton Dallas — There is something about a last name that defines married women. Take, for instance: Kennedy, Jackie or Roosevelt, Eleanor. The public knows them primarily from the complicated reference point of their unfaithful, in-the-spotlight political husbands, rather than from their own individual achievements. In the case of Clinton, Hillary, it is a name we are all too familiar within recent U.S. political history; a name who lost the 42nd presidential election in 2017 to one of the most nefarious characters in history. But Lucas Hnath’s play Hillary and Clinton is not that story. This one took place what seems like eons before, in 2008, and focuses on the first serious woman presidential candidate in the United States. However, this play—having its area premiere by Second Thought Theatre—is not about history; it is herstory told from an 1/4 intimate point of view on one winter’s night, on a Sunday evening, January 2008 in a New Hampshire hotel room during the primaries. In an unexpected win, Hillary sweeps the state against her then opponent, The Other Guy (Barack Obama), who would later win the presidential election. As nights go, this was a fateful one followed by defeat, a defeat that some say (and the play suggests) was based on her inability to break from the image of that other Clinton, her husband, who has marked her existence, one which includes a very public shame for all concerned named Monica.
    [Show full text]
  • Wanting, Not Waiting
    WINNERSdateline OF THE OVERSEAS PRESS CLUB AWARDS 2011 Wanting, Not Waiting 2012 Another Year of Uprisings SPECIAL EDITION dateline 2012 1 letter from the president ne year ago, at our last OPC Awards gala, paying tribute to two of our most courageous fallen heroes, I hardly imagined that I would be standing in the same position again with the identical burden. While last year, we faced the sad task of recognizing the lives and careers of two Oincomparable photographers, Tim Hetherington and Chris Hondros, this year our attention turns to two writers — The New York Times’ Anthony Shadid and Marie Colvin of The Sunday Times of London. While our focus then was on the horrors of Gadhafi’s Libya, it is now the Syria of Bashar al- Assad. All four of these giants of our profession gave their lives in the service of an ideal and a mission that we consider so vital to our way of life — a full, complete and objective understanding of a world that is so all too often contemptuous or ignorant of these values. Theirs are the same talents and accomplishments to which we pay tribute in each of our awards tonight — and that the Overseas Press Club represents every day throughout the year. For our mission, like theirs, does not stop as we file from this room. The OPC has moved resolutely into the digital age but our winners and their skills remain grounded in the most fundamental tenets expressed through words and pictures — unwavering objectivity, unceasing curiosity, vivid story- telling, thought-provoking commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Confirms Callista Gingrich As U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See
    Senate confirms Callista Gingrich as U.S. ambassador to the Holy See WASHINGTON —The Senate confirmed Callista Gingrich as the new U.S. ambassador to the Holy See. Voting late Oct. 16, senators approved her nomination 70-23. More than 20 Democrats joined Republicans in supporting Gingrich, the wife of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a vocal ally of President Donald Trump. Gingrich, 51, a lifelong Catholic and a former congressional aide, has been president of Gingrich Productions, a multimedia production and consulting company in Arlington, Virginia, since 2007. She was expected to present her credentials at the Vatican in the coming weeks. Gingrich’s associates welcomed the vote. Among them was Msgr. Walter R. Rossi, rector of the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, where Gingrich has been a longtime member of the choir. “Callista has been part of our shrine family for two decades and so, as any family rejoices when good news arrives, we rejoice with Callista,” Msgr. Rossi said in an Oct. 17 statement. “Both Callista and Speaker Gingrich are wonderful supporters of our ministry here at Mary’s shrine, most especially our music program. “More importantly, Callista has a great love for the church and our country,” he added. “Her faith is an integral part of her life and I am confident that her faith will be her solid foundation as she enters a new service to church and nation.” The Bethlehem University Foundation wished Gingrich “great success in her new role.” The Gingrichs have been foundation patrons, serving as advisers to its executive director and donors.
    [Show full text]
  • JBSR 4.1.Indd
    volume 4 number 1 summer 2017 Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships james c. wadley, phd, editor Lincoln University jeanine staples, edd, guest editor Penn State University Copyright © 2018 James C. Wadley Th e Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships (JBSR) is a refereed, interdisciplinary, scholarly inquiry devoted to addressing the epistemological, ontological, and social con- struction of sexual expression and relationships of persons within the African diaspora. Th e journal will be used as a medium to capture the functionality and dysfunctionality of individuals, couples, and families as well as the effi cacy in which relationships are nego- tiated. Th e journal seeks to take into account the transhistorical substrates that subsume behavioral, aff ective, and cognitive functioning of persons of African descent as well as those who educate or clinically serve this important population. For additional informa- tion about the JBSR, you can visit Th eJBSR .com, follow us on twitter @Th eJBSR, like our Facebook page, or review current JBSR trends on LinkedIn. Subscriptions Th e Journal of Black Sexuality and Relationships (ISSN 2334- 2668) is published quarterly by the University of Nebraska Press. For current subscription rates please see our website: www .nebraskapress .unl .edu. If ordering by mail, please make checks payable to the University of Nebraska Press and send to Th e University of Nebraska Press 1111 Lincoln Mall Lincoln, NE 68588- 0630 Telephone: 402- 472- 8536 submissions Manuscripts should be prepared in 12- point Times New Roman with 1- inch margins. Notes and apparatus must conform to the sixth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Porting Transmedia Storytelling to Journalism
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2011 Porting Transmedia Storytelling to Journalism Kevin Timothy Moloney University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the Digital Humanities Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Moloney, Kevin Timothy, "Porting Transmedia Storytelling to Journalism" (2011). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 440. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/440 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. PORTING TRANSMEDIA STORYTELLING TO JOURNALISM __________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Social Sciences University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts __________ by Kevin T. Moloney August 2011 Advisor: Dr. Adrienne Russell © Copyright Kevin T. Moloney, 2011 All Rights Reserved Author: Kevin T. Moloney Title: PORTING TRANSMEDIA STORYTELLING TO JOURNALISM Advisor: Dr. Adrienne Russell Degree Date: August 2011 ABSTRACT This thesis examines how the methods of transmedia storytelling emerging in the entertainment industry might be used in a journalism context. Journalism is facing many crises, not the least of which is a loss of readership and perceived relevance to its public. Presented with an ever-expanding array of media with which to interact, the public is more difficult to attract to a socially relevant issue or a politically important story.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options
    ISSUE BRIEF 08.25.20 The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Ph.D, Fellow for the Middle East conflict, the Gulf states complied with and INTRODUCTION enforced the Arab League boycott of Israel This issue brief examines where the six until at least 1994 and participated in the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council— oil embargo of countries that supported 1 Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Israel in the Yom Kippur War of 1973. In Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates 1973, for example, the president of the (UAE)—currently stand in their outlook and UAE, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, approaches toward the Israeli-Palestinian claimed that “No Arab country is safe from issue. The first section of this brief begins by the perils of the battle with Zionism unless outlining how positions among the six Gulf it plays its role and bears its responsibilities, 2 states have evolved over the three decades in confronting the Israeli enemy.” In since the Madrid Conference of 1991. Section Kuwait, Sheikh Fahd al-Ahmad Al Sabah, a two analyzes the degree to which the six brother of two future Emirs, was wounded Gulf states’ relations with Israel are based while fighting with Fatah in Jordan in 3 on interests, values, or a combination of 1968, while in 1981 the Saudi government both, and how these differ from state to offered to finance the reconstruction of state. Section three details the Gulf states’ Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor after it was 4 responses to the peace plan unveiled by destroyed by an Israeli airstrike.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Joseph Buchanan, “Culture War Speech: Address to the Republican National Convention” (17 August 1992)
    Voices of Democracy 7 (2012): 47‐59 Miller 47 PATRICK JOSEPH BUCHANAN, “CULTURE WAR SPEECH: ADDRESS TO THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION” (17 AUGUST 1992) Eric C. Miller Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Abstract: Patrick Buchanan's speech from the 1992 Republican National Convention is frequently cited as a definitive artifact of the culture wars of the late twentieth century. After challenging President George H.W. Bush in the Republican Primary, Buchanan agreed to endorse Bush in exchange for a primetime speaking slot at the RNC in Houston. Having attacked Bush over tax policy, Buchanan drew on social issues to stir passions and unite the GOP behind Bush's candidacy. Keywords: Buchanan, Bush, culture war, family values, Republican National Convention On August 17, 1992, conservative commentator Patrick J. Buchanan addressed the Republican National Convention, delivering a speech that would long be remembered as the definitive statement of the American "culture war." Diagnosing the national condition as one of spiritual decline, Buchanan neatly divided the American populace into two competing camps— one that was traditional, patriotic, and conservative, and another that was radical, deviant, and fiercely liberal. A vote for George H. W. Bush, Buchanan declared, was a vote for the former; a vote for William Jefferson Clinton was a vote for the latter. If Americans were to emerge from their spiritual descent and return to the "Judeo‐Christian" values upon which the nation was founded, it was vital that they support of the Republican ticket. Couched in the language of warfare, the stakes of Buchanan's vision were unmistakably high. But in order to understand Buchanan's argument—indeed, to understand why he was afforded a speaking slot at the RNC in the first place—one must first understand a few things about his life, career, politics, and the context in which these events unfolded.
    [Show full text]