DOCSLIB.ORG

Highlands, Islands, & Psalm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Highlands, Islands, & Psalm 148 GOD’S PROVIDENCE IN FAMILY HISTORY Somerled et ux, their kin, & especially their royal F14 son Dr. James J. S. Johnson ICR’s “Your Origins Matter” series Bayside Community Church, Tampa Sunday, June 16th AD2019, 10 a.m. 1 Praise the LORD from the earth, ye dragons, and all deeps; fire, and hail; snow, and vapors; stormy wind fulfilling his Word; mountains, and all hills; fruitful trees, and all cedars; beasts, and all cattle; creeping things, and flying fowl; kings of the earth, and all people; princes, and all judges of the earth; both young men, and maidens; old men, and children! Let them praise the name of the LORD: for His name alone is excellent; His glory is above the earth and heaven. (Psalm 148:7-13) 2 Psalm 148 Creation is a Cosmic Orchestra, Providing Praise Music for God Verse 7: all critters in the “deeps” Verse 9: trees, including evergreen trees Wood Pigeons & Squirrels routinely nest in Scottish trees 5 Verse 10: land animals, of all sorts Badger homes (“setts”) are cavernous ! Verse 10: creepy critters ! including Aphid-eating Trap-door Spiders Earthworms live in, tunnel through, & change the soil, increasing its aeration, H2O drainage, soil turnover, etc. Verse 10: flying fowl Osprey (a/k/a Fish Hawk) 10 11 12 Red Grouse (Scotland’s Willow Ptarmigan subspecies) a/k/a Moorfowl, Moorcock, Moorbird 13 Wood Sandpiper (TL), Common Sandpiper (M), Bagpiper (R) 14 Verse 11: people, “big” & “small” Sing unto the LORD a new song, and His praise from the end of the earth, ye that go down to the sea, and all that is therein; the isles [i.e., the coast-lands] and the inhabitants thereof. (Isaiah 42:10) 16 “This will be written for the generation to come, that a niphal participle נ ִ֝רְבָ֗א ] people yet to be created form of bara’] may praise the LORD” (Psalm 102:18) Why learn about family history ? • Learning family history can help us to better appreciate God as our very personal Creator. • Learning family history, of specific people who have made a serious impact (for good) in world history, can help us to appreciate God’s amazing providence & sovereignty, over generations, throughout time (history) & space (geography). • Learning the family history of others can help us to appreciate how valuable they are to God. 18 You could have been a grackle! ( a Fathers’ Day providential procreation perspective ) And [God, Who made the world and all things therein] hath made, of one blood, all nations of men, for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and He [i.e., God] hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation. (Acts 17:26) “Boundaries” of habitation can be geographical (like seas, mountains, & rivers) or political (like national boundaries). 20 Caveat: Viking history suffers “revision”. 21 Leif Eiriksson was a Viking soul-winner! 22 Thjodhild’s Chapel, Brattahlid, Greenland 23 What about forensic studies of Viking history ? Evolutionary assumptions corrupt C-14 dating ! ( Uniformitarian error misleads dating of bones. ) What about C-14 dating assumptions? C-14 dating method uses flawed assumptions ! “The [Carbon-14-based] age assignment for certain Viking bones caused a decades-long controversy until the Carbon-14 methodology used to date them was recently exposed for its flawed assumptions … [showing] one-size-fits all radiocarbon dating doesn’t work. … The Vikings were known for a seafood diet— specifically fish. Fish contain much less carbon-14 than land- based foods like grains, vegetables, fruits, dairy products, and livestock meats. Therefore, unless dietary differences are adjusted for, carbon-dated skeletons of fish-eating Vikings appear to be about 100 years or more “older” than they really are.” JJSJ, Acts & Facts (May AD2018, page 21) A.D. 563: Columba, from Ireland to Scotland / Hebrides 27 Decline of Britain’s Celtic Church after Columba: Adomnan, trusts Northumbria’s Ceolfrith, endorses Synod of Whitby ruling; Adomnan’s defection to Rome (~AD687) was rejected by the Iona brethren, including Ségéne mac Fiachnai (5th abbot of Iona) and Cumméne the White (7th abbot, died AD669), and Colman (Lindisfarne abbot who resigned in protest, AD664, returning to Iona, because Lindisfarne was controlled by Northumbria); Cuthbert replaced Colman. Adomnan became 9th abbot of Iona in AD679, transferring it to Rome by AD704. The Viking attack in AD793 was interpreted, then, as a display of God’s punitive wrath. 28 A.D. 802: Vikings attack Iona 29 Celtic Christianity survived in pockets. Meanwhile, The Church of Rome expanded its presence & control in Britain, including Scotland. 30 Aud, Hardrada, Olaf, Somerled & ux, etc. So, who was King Somerled ? 32 Somerled strove for Celtic revival. 33 Somerled led the “Isles men”. 34 Battle of Renfrew, A.D. 1164 (Somerled dies 6 miles west of Glasgow; Malcolm IV wins.) 35 King Somerled’s ancestry, including Norse kings Harald Hardrada & Olaf Kyrre 36 Battle of Stamford Bridge, 9-25-AD1066 IMPACT of NORWAY’S KING HARALD HARDRADA on the BRITISH ISLES Somerled is descended HARALD “HARDRADA” SIGURDSSON ===== THORA THORBERGSDOTTIR King of Norway (1046-1066) │ King Harald’s second wife b. 1015; d. Sept. 25th,1066 │ born 1025; died ? (F3 & F5) from Norway’s killed @ Stamford Bridge, near Jorvik (York), England │ (a Norwegian) _______________│__________ │ │ GODRED CROVAN ==== RAGNHILD │ King, Isle of Man & │ HARALDSDOTTIR OLAF III ==== THORA King Harald Hardrada the Hebrides (1079-1095), │ b. ~1050; d. ? Haraldsson │ Ragnvaldsdottir & Dublin (1091-1094) │ King of Norway │ of Norway b. ?; d. 1095 │ (1068-1093) │ b. ~1050?; d. ? est’d Man’s Tynwald │ b. 1045; d. 1093 │ │ survived Stamford Bridge │ INGIBJORG ====== OLAF THE RED │ Håkonssdottir │ Godredsson “Bitling” │ Orkney / Isle of Man │ King, Isle of Man & Hebrides TORA ====== MAGNUS III b. ~1097; d. ? │ (1114–1153) b. ~1085; d. 1153 of Norway │ “Bare–legs” Olafsson │ b. ?; d. ? │ King of Norway . │ │ (1093-1103) │ │ b. 1073; d. 8-24-1103 │ │ killed in Connaught, Eire │ │ │ BLATHMIN ======= SIGURD “the Crusader” │ (Irish princess) │ [“Jórsalafari”] Magnusson │ betrothed @ 5 │ King of Norway (1103-1130) │ abandoned by 14 year-old Sigurd │ King of Man & Isles (1098-1103) . │ at Orkney, in 1103 │ King of Orkney (1099-1105) │ actually married (as teen) in 1102 │ b. ~1089; d. March 26th, 1130 │ │ │ │ │ │ │ SIGURDSDOTTIR ===== GILLEBRIDE │ b. ~1104; d. ? │ Thane of Argyll . │ │ b. ~1095; d. ~1164 │ │ RAGNHILD OLAFSDOTTIR ========== SOMERLED macGILLEBRIDE “of Man” (i.e., Manx) │ King of Man & Hebrides 1156-1164 b. ~1117; d. ? │ b. ~1118; d. 1164 │ ROGNVALD SOMERLEDSSON (also REGINALD or RANALD / SUMARLIDASSON) b. ~1148; d. 1207 King of the Isles & lord of Dál Riata Scotland (Argyll, Islay, & Kintyre), 1164 to ~1210 © A.D. 2007 James J. S. Johnson Norfolk Heritage Review Short Paper # AD2007–03–25 So, who was Aud, Ragnhild’s ancestor ? ( mother of Thorstein, P2 of Groa, P3 of Grelod ) 39 Krosshólaborg (“cross hill”) 40 Why did Aud (& her family) flee north, to Iceland ? Aud lost Olaf, Ketil, & Thorstein (Sigurd’s ally). 41 Somerled’s wife Ragnhild, & her ancestors, including Aud, Groa, Grelod, Sigurd the Stout, &c 42 Grelod & Thorfinn Skull-splitter Hlodvir; Hlodvir & ux (Audna) Sigurd the Stout 43 Sigurd the Stout, Ragnhild’s ancestor, was duped & died at Clontarf (A.D. 1014). “Gormlaith instructed her son Silkbeard to tell Sigurd “the Stout” Hlodvirsson (earl of Orkney, grandson of Thorfinn Skull-splitter Einarsson) that she would marry Sigurd Hlodvirsson if Brian Boru (her ex) was defeated, plus Gormlaith would use her political power/influence to establish Sigurd as High King in Ireland. However, Gormlaith likewise instructed her son Silkbeard to similarly tell Bróðir (a/k/a Bróðir of Man, i.e., a warrior from the Isle of Man) that she would marry Bróðir if Brian Boru (her ex) was defeated, plus Gormlaith would use her political power/influence to establish Bróðir as High King in Ireland. … Orkney’s earl Sigurd Hlodvirsson was killed by Brian’s son Murchad [recall that Brian Boru was Gormlaith’s ex-husband]; soon afterwards Murchad himself (the main leader of Brian’s forces) also died. … Obviously Gormlaith never had a problem explaining her simultaneous proposals of marriage to Sigurd and to Bróðir --- because both men died then at Clontarf. …[And it further appears that Gormlaith then married the battle’s ‘winner’] Máel Sechlainn II, king of Meath, who usually had opposed Brian Boru more than he had helped him…. ”, JJSJ, Sitric ‘Silkbeard’, Family Fireworks, and Viking Age Ireland” (AD2018), page 7. 44 Battle of Clontarf, A.D. 1014 Was Gormlaith a queen worth dying for ? Ask Brian (Irish), Sigurd (Orcadian), & Broðir (Manx) ! 45 It’s good that Sigurd the Stout had fathered Thorfinn II (“the Mighty”, born ca. AD1009) before Sigurd died in AD1014. Thorfinn II begat Pål, who begat Håkon, who begat Ingibjorg, who married Manx-Hebridean king Olaf “the Red” (“Bitling”) Godredsson, who both parented Ragnhild Olafsdottir, who married Somerled. 46 Pål Thorfinnsson, Ragnhild’s ancestor, also survived Stamford Bridge (A.D. 1066); begat Håkon (A.D. 1070) 47 Scottish Pre-Reformation Lollards Lollards were controversial in Scotland: Dietrich von Nieheim (AD1414), a German historian reports that Wycliffite doctrines were popularly circulated in Bohemia and Moravia, as well as in England and Scotland. Jean d’Archéry (AD1415) reported the same in Bohemia and Scotland. Jean Gerson (AD1415) also reported Wycliffism in Scotland, as well as in France, Germany, Bohemia, and England. [See Katie
Recommended publications
  • Anglo- Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066

    Anglo- Saxon England and the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066

    1.1 Anglo- Saxon society Key topic 1: Anglo- Saxon England and 1.2 The last years of Edward the Confessor and the succession crisis the Norman Conquest, 1060-1066 1.3 The rival claimants for the throne 1.4 The Norman invasion The first key topic is focused on the final years of Anglo-Saxon England, covering its political, social and economic make-up, as well as the dramatic events of 1066. While the popular view is often of a barbarous Dark-Ages kingdom, students should recognise that in reality Anglo-Saxon England was prosperous and well governed. They should understand that society was characterised by a hierarchical system of government and they should appreciate the influence of the Church. They should also be aware that while Edward the Confessor was pious and respected, real power in the 1060s lay with the Godwin family and in particular Earl Harold of Wessex. Students should understand events leading up to the death of Edward the Confessor in 1066: Harold Godwinson’s succession as Earl of Wessex on his father’s death in 1053 inheriting the richest earldom in England; his embassy to Normandy and the claims of disputed Norman sources that he pledged allegiance to Duke William; his exiling of his brother Tostig, removing a rival to the throne. Harold’s powerful rival claimants – William of Normandy, Harald Hardrada and Edgar – and their motives should also be covered. Students should understand the range of causes of Harold’s eventual defeat, including the superior generalship of his opponent, Duke William of Normandy, the respective quality of the two armies and Harold’s own mistakes.
  • Anne R Johnston Phd Thesis

    Anne R Johnston Phd Thesis

    ;<>?3 ?3@@8393;@ 6; @53 6;;3> 530>623? 1/# *%%"&(%%- B6@5 ?=316/8 >343>3;13 @< @53 6?8/;2? <4 9A88! 1<88 /;2 @6>33 /OOG ># 7PJOSTPO / @JGSKS ?UDNKTTGF HPR TJG 2GIRGG PH =J2 CT TJG AOKVGRSKTY PH ?T# /OFRGWS &++& 4UMM NGTCFCTC HPR TJKS KTGN KS CVCKMCDMG KO >GSGCREJ.?T/OFRGWS,4UMM@GXT CT, JTTQ,$$RGSGCREJ"RGQPSKTPRY#ST"COFRGWS#CE#UL$ =MGCSG USG TJKS KFGOTKHKGR TP EKTG PR MKOL TP TJKS KTGN, JTTQ,$$JFM#JCOFMG#OGT$&%%'($'+)% @JKS KTGN KS QRPTGETGF DY PRKIKOCM EPQYRKIJT Norse settlement in the Inner Hebrides ca 800-1300 with special reference to the islands of Mull, Coll and Tiree A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anne R Johnston Department of Mediaeval History University of St Andrews November 1990 IVDR E A" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS None of this work would have been possible without the award of a studentship from the University of &Andrews. I am also grateful to the British Council for granting me a scholarship which enabled me to study at the Institute of History, University of Oslo and to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs for financing an additional 3 months fieldwork in the Sunnmore Islands. My sincere thanks also go to Prof Ragni Piene who employed me on a part time basis thereby allowing me to spend an additional year in Oslo when I was without funding. In Norway I would like to thank Dr P S Anderson who acted as my supervisor. Thanks are likewise due to Dr H Kongsrud of the Norwegian State Archives and to Dr T Scmidt of the Place Name Institute, both of whom were generous with their time.
  • Whyte, Alasdair C. (2017) Settlement-Names and Society: Analysis of the Medieval Districts of Forsa and Moloros in the Parish of Torosay, Mull

    Whyte, Alasdair C. (2017) Settlement-Names and Society: Analysis of the Medieval Districts of Forsa and Moloros in the Parish of Torosay, Mull

    Whyte, Alasdair C. (2017) Settlement-names and society: analysis of the medieval districts of Forsa and Moloros in the parish of Torosay, Mull. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/8224/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten:Theses http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Settlement-Names and Society: analysis of the medieval districts of Forsa and Moloros in the parish of Torosay, Mull. Alasdair C. Whyte MA MRes Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Celtic and Gaelic | Ceiltis is Gàidhlig School of Humanities | Sgoil nan Daonnachdan College of Arts | Colaiste nan Ealain University of Glasgow | Oilthigh Ghlaschu May 2017 © Alasdair C. Whyte 2017 2 ABSTRACT This is a study of settlement and society in the parish of Torosay on the Inner Hebridean island of Mull, through the earliest known settlement-names of two of its medieval districts: Forsa and Moloros.1 The earliest settlement-names, 35 in total, were coined in two languages: Gaelic and Old Norse (hereafter abbreviated to ON) (see Abbreviations, below).
  • Anglo-Saxon 1

    Anglo-Saxon 1

    Anglo‐Saxon 1: AD 410‐AD 1066 Anglo—Saxon Age AD 410—AD 1066 The last Roman soldiers le Britain in AD 410, new selers arrived in ships , the Anglo‐Saxons. They were a mixture of tribes from Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands, the main three tribes were the Angles, Saxons and Jutes. The land they seled was called Angle‐land…. England. Each group of selers had a leader or war‐chief. Powerful leaders became cyning (king) and the strongest of these would claim to be bretwalda (sovereign of Britain). By around AD 600 there were five major kingdoms, somemes at peace and somemes at war with each other. From this me the pagan Anglo‐Saxons began to convert to Chrisanity. The early Anglo‐Saxons were pagans and believed in many gods, much like the Scandinavian Vikings. King of the Anglo‐Saxon gods was Woden (from this comes ‘Woden’s day’ or Wednesday). Thunor (Thursday) was the god of thunder, Frige (Friday) the goddess of love and Tiw (Tuesday), god of war. Burials can tell us a lot about these people. Warriors would be buried with their spear and shield although we may only find the bones and metal parts remaining during excavaon. The graves of women may include weaving tools and jewellry. The Lakenheath Warrior (le) was buried in a wooden coffin with his sword, shield and spear lain on top. He was also buried with his horse. The burial also contained food for the aerlife. The Suon Hoo cemetery site contains burial mounds. One of these, (believed to be Raedwald, King of East Anglia) contained a complete ship (only the outline and rivets survived), the ceremonial helmet (right), metalwork dress fings (below), weapons and silver plate from Byzanum.
  • Harald Hardrada Invades

    Harald Hardrada Invades

    What happened when Edward the Confessor died? Harald Hardrada invades What do I need to know: • 5th January 1066 – Edward the Confessor dies The events of the Battles of Fulford • 6th January 1066 – Harold Godwinson crowned King of England From the moment that Harold Godwinson was crowned, he was aware that he Gate and Stamford Bridge What happened to the 4 contenders? faced a number of challenges to his throne. He marched south which part of his Why Hardrada won Fulford • William, Duke of Normandy claims the throne was promised to him army to prepare for an invasion by William. He left the rest of his army under the Why he lost Stamford Bridge. – he mobilises his troops in preparation for an invasion of Britain command of his brothers in law earls Edwin and Morcar. • Edgar Aethling considered too young to be King or challenge the Key Words: Harold prepares to strike! • Fulford gate decision • Fyrd • Harald Hardrada prepares to invade in the North • Haralf Hardrada of Norway invaded England in the September. • Hardrada • 8th September – peasant soldiers, known as the fyrd, sent home to • He sailed up the river Humber with 300 ships and landed 16 km (10 miles) from the city of • Stamford Bridge harvest the crops York. Earls Edwin and Morcar were waiting for him with the northern army and attempted to • Viking • Harald Hardrada invades the north of England prevent the Norwegian forces from advancing to York. • Earls Edwin and Morcar wait with the northern army to prevent the Were the battles significant? Norwegian forces from advancing The Battle of Stamford Bridge Significant because… However… The loss at Fulford meant that King Harold had to move quickly to deal with the Viking invasion.
  • Harold Godwinson in 1066

    Harold Godwinson in 1066

    Y7 Home Learning HT2 This term we are studying the Norman conquest of 1066 and onwards. An event which changed how England looked and worked for years to come. The tasks below relate to each week of study, and should only be completed depending on what your teacher asks. Week 1 Task 1 Watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cKGz- st75w&ab_channel=BBCTeach Think: How different was Saxon England to today’s England? Answer these questions below: 1. What did the Saxons do for entertainment? 2. What did people do for medicine? 3. What is the main religion in Britain now? How different do you think Saxon Britain is compared to today? Answer in your books. Task 2 Read the information above to connect the correct descriptions to the correct job title in your books, using the words below. Job Titles: Descriptions: Peasant Farmers Old Wise men Slaves Bought and sold Thegns (pronounced Thane) Those who rent farms Earls Aristocrats The Monarchy Holds more land than peasants The Witan Advisors Is owed service Lives in a manor house Relationships are based on loyalty 10% of the population Decide the new King Week 2 Task 3 Look at the image below: This image is a tapestry, showing an image of King Harold Godwinson in 1066. There are 9 items in the tapestry that have been circled. Explain in your book how each of these 9 people/items show Harold as a powerful king. E.g. The orb shows Harold as powerful because… Task 4 Read the source of information about Harold Godwinson below.
  • The Making of a Frontier: Thefirthlands from the Ninth to Twelfth Centuries

    The Making of a Frontier: Thefirthlands from the Ninth to Twelfth Centuries

    THE MAKING OF A FRONTIER: THEFIRTHLANDS FROM THE NINTH TO TWELFTH CENTURIES Barbara E. Crawford The clash between Norse and Scots (or Picts) was a perennial feature of the northern and western parts of this country for most of the Middle Ages. Wherever the Norseman settled he came into contact, and most probably conflict, with the indigenous population. Although the apparent dis­ appearance of the Picts in the Northern Isles is something of a mystery, it does not seem likely that they disappeared without putting up at least a show of resistance. But the impact of the Norse was so overwhelming that the Pictish population failed to retain any hold of their lands in those islands. The Hebrides provide rather more evidence of resistance at the outset, and then intermingling between the native Gaelic population and the Norse raiders and settlers. But native Gaelic culture re-asserted itself, and Scottish political control was established by the medieval kings of Scotland, ambitious to control the islands round their coasts. The north Scottish mainland provides an area where Norse and Scots also clashed although it was never, in recorded history, under Norwegian political control. However both Caithness and Sutherland were firmly under the rule of the Norwegian earls of Orkney until their power was undermined by the advancing Scottish kings in the thirteenth century. The earls' political control was based on widespread settlement by Norse­ speaking peoples as far south as the Dornoch Firth or Kyle of Sutherland, so that to all intents and purposes the territory north of that waterway was part of the Norse world from the ninth to the thirteenth century.
  • Magnus Barefoot from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Magnus Barefoot from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Magnus Barefoot From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the second Norwegian king named Magnus Olafsson. For the earlier Norwegian king, see Magnus the Good. Magnus Barefoot Drawing of a coin from the reign of Magnus Barefoot (with confused legend)[1] King of Norway Reign September 1093 – 24 August 1103 Predecessor Olaf III Successor Sigurd I, Eystein I and Olaf Magnusson Co-ruler Haakon Magnusson (until 1095) King of Dublin Reign 1102–1103 Predecessor Domnall Gerrlámhach Successor Domnall Gerrlámhach Born 1073 Norway Died 24 August 1103 (aged 29–30) near River Quoile, Downpatrick Ulster, Ireland Burial near St. Patrick's Church, Downpatrick, Ulster, Ireland Consort Margaret of Sweden Eystein I of Norway Issue Sigurd I of Norway Olaf Magnusson of Norway Ragnild Magnusdotter Tora Magnusdatter Harald IV Gille (claimed) Sigurd Slembe (claimed) Magnus Raude (claimed) Full name Magnús Óláfsson House Hardrada Father Olaf III of Norway Mother Tora?; disputed (see below) Religion Roman Catholicism Magnus Olafsson (Old Norse: Magnús Óláfsson, Norwegian: Magnus Olavsson; 1073 – 24 August 1103), better known as Magnus Barefoot (Old Norse: Magnús berfœttr, Norwegian: Magnus Berrføtt),[2] was King of Norway (as Magnus III) from 1093 until his death in 1103. His reign was marked by aggressive military campaigns and conquest, particularly in the Norse-dominated parts of the British Isles, where he extended his rule to the Kingdom of the Isles and Dublin. His daughter, Ragnhild, was born in 1090. As the only son of King Olaf Kyrre, Magnus was proclaimed king in southeastern Norway shortly after his father's death in 1093. In the north, his claim was contested by his cousin, Haakon Magnusson (son of King Magnus Haraldsson), and the two co-ruled uneasily until Haakon's death in 1095.
  • The Anglo-Saxons

    The Anglo-Saxons

    The Anglo-Saxons “In the case of the king, the resources and tools with which to rule are that he have his land fully manned: he must have praying men, fighting men and working men. You know also that without these tools no king may make his ability known.” King Alfred’s digressions in his translation of Boethius’s “Consolation of Philosophy” This module includes the following topics: ❖ Anglo-Saxon Timeline ❖ The Anglo-Saxons ❖ Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms ❖ Society and Structure ❖ Anglo-Saxon Kings End of Anglo-Saxon ❖ Depiction of an Anglo- Kingdom Saxon King with nobles LEARNING OBJECTIVES KEY WORDS At the end of the module, Anglo- Tithing you should be able to: Hundreds Trace the beginning and Saxon ❖ Normans end of the Anglo-Saxon Jutes Burghs period of England Saxons ❖ Map the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms Angles ❖ Be familiar with the rule Kingdoms and succession of Paganism Anglo-Saxon kings Christianity ❖ Analyse the life and society of the Anglo- Saxons ANGLO-SAXON TIMELINE In 410, after the By 793, Danish By 597, St. Augustine, an sacking of Rome by Viking raiders Italian monk, arrived in Alaric, King of the began attacking Kent and founded a Goths, Roman Lindisfarne, Jarrow, Benedictine monastery at legions departed and Iona. Canterbury and converted from Britannia. the King of Kent to Alfred the Great By 449, three Christianity. defeated the Danes shiploads of at Edington in 878. Saxon warriors In 635, Aidan founded a led by Hengist monastery in and Horsa arrived Lindisfarne, followed by in Kent. the Synod of Whitby in 664. According to legends, King Arthur defeated the Saxons at Mount Badon in 518.
  • The Origin of the Name Somhairle Donald M

    The Origin of the Name Somhairle Donald M

    The Origin of the Name Somhairle Donald M. Schlegel It usually has been stated in modern times that Somhairle's name was Norse Somerled or Sumarlidi, meaning Summer-leader, one who led viking expeditions in the summertime. The name presumaby was brought from Norse into Irish and became Somhairle, pronounced "Sorley." From this it has been inferred that Somhairle's mother, or perhaps his father, was Norse. However, the late Robert Livingston pointed out another possible source in the Irish name Suairleach. The name could have gone in the reverse direction, from Gaelic to Norse. Only three men are known to have borne the name Sumarlidi before the great Somhairle, King of Argyll; they all lived in Orkney and western Scotland and all are obscure. About two generations earlier was Sumarlidi Ospaksson, father of Thora who was wife of Erlend, Earl of Orkney. Erlend died about 1102. This Sumarlidi's ancestors over five or six generations had moved from Norway to Iceland and thence to Orkney. The next earlier Sumarlidi was a son of Sigurd the Stout, Earl of Orkney. This is the Sigurd who invaded Ireland and died at the battle of Clontarf in 1014. This Sumarlidi's mother is unknown; his grandmother was Edna, daughter of an Irish king named Cearbhall; his great-grandmother was Grelaud, daughter of Donnchadh, ruler of Caithness. The earliest Sumarlidi lived around the year 900. In the Laxdaela Saga, Hrapp who lived in Laxriverdale in Iceland was son of a man named Sumarlidi. This father, however, was not Norse; he was said to have been Scottish, while the mother was from the Sudreys (Hebrides).
  • Somerled DNA Handout

    Somerled DNA Handout

    DNA says Manx King, Somerled, the Celebrated Founding Father of Scottish Clans, had a“Norse” Patrilinear Ancestry ! DNA-TRACKING SOMERLED, KING OF THE IST.E OF MAN AND THE HEBRIDES Remarkably,Somerled’s biogenetic impact on humanity has been studied beyond that of almost everyone else who has ever lived on this planet, and some of it has stirred up controversy in Scotland.Somerled’s biogenetic identity is even mentioned in aWikipedia entry, as follows: In 2005 astudy by Professor of Human Genetics Bryan Sykes of Oxford led to the conclusionthat Somerled has possibly 500,000 living descendants —making him the second most common currently-known ancestor after Genghis Khan. Sykes's research ledhim to conclude that Somerled was amember of the Y-DNA R1a1 Haplogroup, often considered the marker of Viking descent among men of deep British or Scottish ancestry. {Quoting from “Somerled” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somerled/ .)‘ As will be described below.Dr. Sykes also concluded that Somerled’s father was aNorse Viking, n^ aCeltic Scot. This news has upset many of Somerled’s living descendants !^ Thegenetic history of the Vikings Age, in general, has recently been the object of serious genetic science research.^ Indeed,Somerled’s progeny have much to appreciate about this research -but primarily they shouldbe appreciating God for His providencein procreatively making them, in everyexact biogeneticdetail, as exactly the unique human beings He made each of them to be! ^Ofcourse, this should not have been too shocking, because the name “Somerled” is merely a modifiedversion of the Old Norse name Sumarlidi, meaning “summer-traveler” (i.e., asummer sailor).
  • Slavic Raid on Konungahella

    Slavic Raid on Konungahella

    CM 2014 ombrukket3.qxp_CM 30.04.15 15.46 Side 6 Slavic Raid on Konungahella ROMAN ZAROFF The article explores the naval raid of the Slavic forces on the coastal norwegian port set - tlement of Konungahella in the mid 1130s. The paper analyses the raid in the context of regional politics and from the perspective of Baltic Slavs. It also encompasses the wider political context of contemporary imperial and Polish politics. It addresses the issue of the timing of the raid, participation of other than Pomeranian Slavs, and the reasons why it took place. It focuses on the reasons behind the raid which are surrounded by contro - versy and various interpretations. The paper postulates an alternative explanation to the politically motivated explanations previously accepted. One of the least known and researched historical events in Scandinavian mediaeval history appears to be the Slavic ride and plunder of the important norwegian port and settlement of Kungahälla-Konungahella 1, that took place around 1135/1136. Be - fore we analyse the reasons, causes and implication of this raid, we will concentrate on some background issues including a short description of the expedition and assault on Konungahella. Sources Regretfully our knowledge about this event comes solely from a single historical source, that being Saga of Magnus the Blind and of Harald Gille by Snorri Sturluson. he was an Icelander who was born in 1179 and died in 1249. The Saga of Magnus the Blind and of Harald Gille is part of a larger work known as Heimskringla – a saga or history of the kings of norway.