Museum of New Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Museum of New Mexico MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES EXCAVATION OF A JORNADA MOGOLLON PITHOUSE ALONG U.S. 380, SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW rnXIC0 by Daisy F. Levine James L. Moore Susan M. Moga Linda Mick-O'Hara Mollie S. Toll and a contribution by Glenna Dean Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes, M.A. Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 138 SANTA FE 1997 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY From November 6, 1991, to February 4, 1992, the Office of ArchaeologicalStudies (OAS), Museum of New Mexico, conducted a datarecovery program at LA 71276, a Jornada Mogollon pit structure along U.S. 380 in Socorro County, New Mexico. The site is approximately of Bingham, on land belonging to the stateof New Mexico. This site was tested by the OAS during a two-week period from March 25 to April 5, 1991e Portions of the site extended into the existing right-of-way; the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department plannedroad modification activity within the existing right-of-wayin this area. During the testingphase, LA 71276 was found to bea dense ceramic and lithic artifact scatter associated with theTajo phase (A.D. 800-1000) of the Jornada Mogollon Culture, on both sides of U.S. 380. Testing revealed a pit structure, a charcoal stain, and a subsurface feature with charcoal fill within the project limits. During datarecovery, six features were examined. These included the pit structure, three undefined surficial charcoal stains, an extramural hearth, and a burial. NMSHTD Project No. F-0 19-l(27); F-019-1(28); CN 2022. MNM Project No. 41,504. Svdte of New Mexico Pennit No. SE-63. Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement DO4635 between the NMSHTD and the Office of Archaeological Studies, MNM. 11 CONTENTS .. Administrative Summary ............................................. 11 Introduction ..................................................... 1 Environment ..................................................... 3 CulturalOverview ................................................. 5 Paleoindian .................................................... 5 Archaic ...................................................... 5 Pithouse and Pueblo Periods......................................... 6 Historic Period ................................................ 10 Data Recovery Plan ............................................... 11 Research Questions .............................................. 11 Field Methods ................................................... 15 Site Description .................................................. 17 Pitstructure .................................................. 17 Burial ...................................................... 26 Extramural Hearth .............................................. 26 Charcoal Stains ................................................ 26 Backhoe Trench ................................................ 27 Chronometrics .................................................. 29 Ceramic Analysis ................................................ 31 Methodology .................................................. 31 Type Description ............................................... 32 Temper Descriptions ............................................. 35 Bingham Assemblage ............................................ 37 Assemblage Comparisons .......................................... 43 Conclusions .................................................. 44 Lithic Artifacts (by James L . Moore) .................................... 47 Methodology .................................................. 47 Ground Stone Analysis Methods ..................................... 49 Chipped Stone Artifacts ........................................... 51 Ground Stone Artifacts ........................................... 87 Conclusions .................................................. 90 Analysis of Botanical Remains(by Mollie S . Toll) ........................... 95 Introduction and Methods ......................................... 95 Results ...................................................... 98 Discussion .................................................. 102 Contents iii Summary ................................................... 105 Analysis of Faunal Remains (by Susan M . Moga) .......................... 109 Introduction ................................................. 109 Methodology ................................................. 109 Overview of Faunal Remains ...................................... 109 Worked Bone Assemblage ........................................ 114 Taphonomic Processes .......................................... 115 Review by Excavation Area ....................................... 116 Conclusions ................................................. 117 Analysis of Human Remains (by LindaMick-O'Hara) ........................ 119 Methodology ................................................. 119 Results ..................................................... 119 Discussion and Conclusions ....................................... 120 Ornaments and Minerals ........................................... 121 Discussion .................................................... 123 Phase Sequences .............................................. 123 Site Comparisons .............................................. 129 Architectural Comparisons: Jornada Mogollon vs. Anasazi ................... 135 Subsistence and Seasonality ....................................... 138 Conclusion .................................................. 141 References Cited ................................................ 143 Appendix 1 . Pollen Analysis (by Glenna Dean)............................ 157 Appendix 2 . Results of Archaeomagnetic Sample ........................... 175 Appendix 3 . Human Remains InventoryForm (Linda Mick-O'Hara) .............. 177 Appendix 4 . Site Location and Legal Description (removedfrom copies in general circulation) ............................................. 181 Figures 1 . Project vicinity map .............................................. 2 2 . Site map. LA 71276 ............................................ 19 3 . Excavated pit structure. LA 71276 ................................... 21 4 . Profile of pit structure fill ......................................... 21 5 . Plan view of excavated pitstructure .................................. 22 6 . Profile of ventilator tunnel ........................................ 23 7 . Ventilator tunnel ............................................... 23 8 . Ventilator. with damper slab in place ................................. 24 9 . Ventilator. with damper slab removed ................................. 24 10. Brown Ware cloudblower ........................................ 40 11. Jornada Red-on-brown sherds and Mimbres Boldface Black-on-whitesherds ....... 40 12 . Red Mesa black-on-white. bold style.............. .,.................. 41 iv Contents 13 . Red Mesa black.on.white. classic style ................................ 44 14 . Manufacturing break patterns of flake fragments .......................... 67 15 . Comparison of thicknesses for whole and broken flakes ..................... 73 16 . Comparison of the thicknesses of flakes with manufacturingbreaks versus snap fractured flakes ................................................ 76 17 . Material quality graphed against core volume ............................ 77 18 . Projectile points from LA 71276 .................................... 86 19. Element distribution of lagomorphs at LA71276 ........................ 113 20 . Worked bone assemblage ........................................ 115 21 . Turquoise pendants from LA 71276 ................................. 121 22. Lehmer's cultural sequence ...................................... 123 23 . Map of theJornada Mogollon boundaries (after Lehmer1948) ............... 124 24 . The Sierra Blanca region (after Kelley 1984) ........................... 127 1 . Generalized artifact-phase sequences inthe area ........................... 7 2 . Results of C-14 analysis .......................................... 29 3 . Ceramic types from LA 71276 ...................................... 31 4. Brown Ware surface color ........................................ 37 5 . Brown Ware paste color .......................................... 38 6 . Surface color of Brown Ware bowls .................................. 38 7 . Design band widthfor red-on-brown ceramics ........................... 42 8 . White ware tempers ............................................. 42 9 . Type of modification on worked sherds ................................ 43 10. Correlation of attributes analyzed with chipped stoneartifact categories ........... 48 11. Polythethic set for distinguishing bifaceflakes from core flakes ................ 50 12 . Material type by artifact morphology. frequencies and rowpercentages ........... 53 13 . Cortex type by artifact class. frequencies and row percentages ................. 53 14 . Material type by cortex type. frequencies and rowpercentages ................ 54 15 . Material source by cortex type. frequencies and row percentages ............... 56 16 . Material type by material quality, frequencies and rowpercentages ............. 57 17 . Artifact classes by texture. frequencies and rowpercentages .................. 58 18. Material type by quality. frequencies and row percentages ................... 60 19. Artifact class by quality. frequencies and row percentages ................... 60 20 . Debitage cortex percentages ....................................... 61 21 . Flakes
Recommended publications
  • FEATURE TYPES Revised 2/2001 Alcove
    THE CROW CANYON ARCHAEOLOGICAL CENTER FEATURE TYPES Revised 2/2001 alcove. A small auxiliary chamber in a wall, usually found in pit structures; they often adjoin the east wall of the main chamber and are substantially larger than apertures and niches. aperture. A generic term for a wall opening that cannot be defined more specifically. architectural petroglyph (not on bedrock). A petroglyph in a standing masonry wall.A piece of wall fall with a petroglyph on it should be sent in as an artifact if size permits. ashpit. A pit used primarily as a receptacle for ash removed from a hearth or firepit. In a pit structure, the ash pit is commonly oval or rectangular and is located south of the hearth or firepit. bedrock feature. A feature constructed into bedrock that does not fit any of the other feature types listed here. bell-shaped cist. A large pit whose greatest diameter is substantially larger than the diameter of its opening.A storage function is implied, but the feature may not contain any stored materials, in which case the shape of the pit is sufficient for assigning this feature type. bench surface. The surface of a wide ledge in a pit structure or kiva that usually extends around at least three-fourths of the circumference of the structure and is often divided by pilasters.The southern recess surface is also considered a bench surface segment; each bench surface segment must be recorded as a separate feature. bin: not further specified. An above-ground compartment formed by walling off a portion of a structure or courtyard other than a corner.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Cook: Howe Mire, Inveresk | 143
    Proc Soc Antiq Scot, 134 (2004), 131–160 COOK: HOWE MIRE, INVERESK | 131 Howe Mire: excavations across the cropmark complex at Inveresk, Musselburgh, East Lothian Murray Cook* with contributions from A Heald, A Croom and C Wallace ABSTRACT Excavations across the complex of cropmarks at Inveresk, Musselburgh, East Lothian (NGR: NT 3540 7165 to NT 3475 7123), revealed a palimpsest of features ranging in date from the late Mesolithic to the Early Historic period. The bulk of the features uncovered were previously known from cropmark evidence and are connected with either the extensive field system associated with the Antonine Fort at Inveresk or the series of Roman marching camps to the south-west of the field system. The excavation has identified a scattering of prehistoric activity, as well as Roman settlement within the field system, together with dating evidence for one of the marching camps and structures reusing dressed Roman stone. INTRODUCTION reports have been included in the site archive. A brief summary of these excavations has been An archaeological watching brief was previously published (Cook 2002a). conducted in advance of the construction of This report deals solely with the excavated 5km of new sewer pipeline from Wallyford to area within the scheduled areas which com- Portobello (NT 3210 7303 to NT 3579 7184). prised a 6m wide trench approximately 670m The construction works were conducted by M J long (illus 1) (NT 3540 7165 to NT 3475 7123). Gleeson Group plc on behalf of Stirling Water. The trench was located immediately to the The route of the pipeline ran through a series south of the Edinburgh to Dunbar railway line of cropmarks to the south of Inveresk (illus (which at this point is in a cutting) and crossed 1; NMRS numbers NT 37 SE 50, NT 37 SW both Crookston and Carberry Roads, Inveresk, 186, NT 37 SW 33, NT37 SW 68 and NT 37 Musselburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS: SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND ADAPTATIONS edited by Yvonne R. Oakes and Dorothy A. Zamora VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS Yvonne R. Oakes Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 232 SANTA FE 1999 NEW MEXICO TABLE OF CONTENTS Figures............................................................................iii Tables............................................................................. iv VOLUME 6. SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS ARCHITECTURAL VARIATION IN MOGOLLON STRUCTURES .......................... 1 Structural Variation through Time ................................................ 1 Communal Structures......................................................... 19 CHANGING SETTLEMENT PATTERNS IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ................ 27 Research Orientation .......................................................... 27 Methodology ................................................................ 27 Examination of Settlement Patterns .............................................. 29 Population Movements ........................................................ 35 Conclusions................................................................. 41 REGIONAL ABANDONMENT PROCESSES IN THE MOGOLLON HIGHLANDS ............ 43 Background for Studying Abandonment Processes .................................. 43 Causes of Regional Abandonment ............................................... 44 Abandonment Patterns in the Mogollon Highlands
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sons and Daughters Program Manual
    NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS PROGRAMS® PROGRAM MANUAL National Longhouse, Ltd. National Longhouse, Ltd. 4141 Rockside Road Suite 150 Independence, OH 44131-2594 Copyright © 2007, 2014 National Longhouse, Ltd. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, xerography, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of National Longhouse, Ltd. Printed in the United States of America EDITORS: Edition 1 - Barry Yamaji National Longhouse, Native Sons And Daughters Programs, Native Dads And Sons, Native Moms And Sons, Native Moms And Daughters are registered trademarks of National Longhouse, Ltd. Native Dads And Daughters, Native Sons And Daughters, NS&D Pathfinders are servicemarks of National Longhouse TABLE of CONTENTS FOREWORD xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Why NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 2 What Are NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 4 Program Format History 4 Program Overview 10 CHAPTER 2: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES 15 Organizational Levels 16 Administrative Levels 17 National Longhouse, Ltd. 18 Regional Advisory Lodge 21 Local Longhouse 22 Nations 24 Tribes 25 CHAPTER 3: THE TRIBE 29 Preparing for a Tribe Meeting 30 Tribe Meetings 32 iii Table of Contents A Sample Tribe Meeting Procedure 34 Sample Closing Prayers 36 Tips for a Successful Meeting 37 The Parents' Meeting 38 CHAPTER 4: AWARDS, PATCHES, PROGRAM
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Glossary of Terms
    AT THE ROAD’S EDGE: FINAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE WILSON FARM TENANCY SITE Appendix E: Glossary of Terms Glossary of Terms Artifact -Any object shaped or modified by man, or as a result of human activity. Archaeology -The study of the people of the past through the systematic recovery and analysis of the artifacts/material evidence they left behind. Archival Research – research conducted in places where public or historical records, charters, and documents are stored and preserved. Assemblage – Collection of persons or things: in archaeological contexts, the collection of artifacts from a particular site, from a stratigraphic level, or cultural component within the site, or a particular artifact class, such as lithics or ceramics. Census, U.S. – An official count of the nation’s population taken every 10 years, often including a collection of demographic information. Culture – A uniquely human system of behavioral patterns, beliefs, habits, and customs, used to interact with other people and with the environment, acquired by people through a nonbiological, uninherited, learned process. Datum – A point, line, or surface used as a reference, as in surveying. Diagnostic - An artifact that can clearly be dated and/or identified as to maker, date, place of origin, etc. Feature -Any soil disturbance or discoloration that reflects human activity. Also, an artifact too large to remove from a site; for example, house foundations, storage pits, etc. Flotation – The process of sifting soil samples through a fine screen while running a steady stream of water over the sample; residual materials such as tiny artifacts, seeds, and bones are separated out into light and heavy fractions for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavation Report
    Excavation Report Roman and Medieval Settlement remains along the Stow Longa to Tilbrook Anglia Water Pipeline Evaluation and Excavation Report January 2009 Client: Anglia Water OA East Report No: 990 OASIS No: oxfordar3-52223 NGR: TL 0800 6900 to 1100 7100 Roman, Saxon and medieval settlement remains along the Stow Longa to Tilbrook Anglian Water Pipeline Archaeological Evaluation and Excavation By Rob Atkins BSocSc Diparch With contributions by Barry Bishop MA; Peter Boardman BA; Paul Blinkhorn BTech; Alasdair Brooks BA MA DPhil; Steve Critchley BSc MSc; Nina Crummy BA FSA; Chris Fane MA MSc BABAO; Carole Fletcher HND BA AIFA; Rachel Fosberry HNC Cert Ed AEA; Alice Lyons BA MIFA and Paul Spoerry BTech PhD MIFA Editor: James Drummond-Murray BA PG Dip MIFA Illustrators: Crane Begg BSc, Gillian Greer BSc MAAIS and Caoimhín Ó Coileáin BA Plates: Andrew Corrigan BA Report Date: January 2009 © Oxford Archaeology East Page 1 of 90 Report Number 990 Report Number: 990 Site Name: Roman, Saxon and medieval settlement remains along the Stow Longa to Tilbrook Anglian Water Pipeline HER Event No: ECB 2780 (for test pits within Tilbrook and evaluation trenches from Tilbrook to Stow Longa. ECB 3507 was given for the two small excavation areas within Stow Longa village Date of Works: November 2007 to October 2008 Client Name: Anglian Water Client Ref: JUL059/07 Planning Ref: N/A Grid Ref: NGR TL 0800 6900 to 1100 7100 Site Code: MULSLT 07 Finance Code: MULSLT 07 Receiving Body: CCC Stores, Landbeach Accession No: Prepared by: Rob Atkins Position: Project Officer Date: December 2008 Checked by: James Drummond-Murray Position: Project Manager Date: December 2008 Signed: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lockdown in Lincoln, Part II
    Lockdown in Lincoln, Part II Safety and Security in La Placita Social Studies Lesson Plan Grades 4, 5 & 7 NM Standards: Strand: History • I-A – Describe how contemporary and SWBATD comprehension of the purpose of the historical people and historic Lincoln torreon by explaining how it served as events influenced NM a defensive structure. communities and regions. • I-A1.- Identify Materials: important issues, ! computer with PowerPoint presentation events and ! projector individuals from New ! white board or screen Mexico pre-history to the present. Day 2~ Anticipatory Set: Strand: Geography: • II-A – Describe how Questions: contemporary and • “Did anyone’s house get invaded by aliens last historical people and night? If your house had been invaded by aliens, events influenced where would you have gone? New Mexico Now imagine you didn’t have a house, in fact, there • communities and were no houses or buildings around. Did you see regions. any natural features in your environment where II-E – Describe how you could have hidden from the aliens?” • economic, political, cultural and social Discussion: processes interact to shape patterns of ! Ask “if aliens did suddenly show up, what might we human populations speculate brought them here?” (Our planet’s and their resources such as water, food, minerals.) interdependence, ! Discuss how we might feel about these creatures cooperation and coming into our world and the fear that they might conflict. take the things that we need to survive. ! Explain how it is a human instinct to want to protect our basic survival necessities. Sometimes a culture will invade another culture to acquire things that aren’t necessities, such as gold or other precious metals.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico
    Cultural Resources Overview Desert Peaks Complex of the Organ Mountains – Desert Peaks National Monument Doña Ana County, New Mexico Myles R. Miller, Lawrence L. Loendorf, Tim Graves, Mark Sechrist, Mark Willis, and Margaret Berrier Report submitted to the Wilderness Society Sacred Sites Research, Inc. July 18, 2017 Public Version This version of the Cultural Resources overview is intended for public distribution. Sensitive information on site locations, including maps and geographic coordinates, has been removed in accordance with State and Federal antiquities regulations. Executive Summary Since the passage of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) in 1966, at least 50 cultural resource surveys or reviews have been conducted within the boundaries of the Desert Peaks Complex. These surveys were conducted under Sections 106 and 110 of the NHPA. More recently, local avocational archaeologists and supporters of the Organ Monument-Desert Peaks National Monument have recorded several significant rock art sites along Broad and Valles canyons. A review of site records on file at the New Mexico Historic Preservation Division and consultations with regional archaeologists compiled information on over 160 prehistoric and historic archaeological sites in the Desert Peaks Complex. Hundreds of additional sites have yet to be discovered and recorded throughout the complex. The known sites represent over 13,000 years of prehistory and history, from the first New World hunters who gazed at the nighttime stars to modern astronomers who studied the same stars while peering through telescopes on Magdalena Peak. Prehistoric sites in the complex include ancient hunting and gathering sites, earth oven pits where agave and yucca were baked for food and fermented mescal, pithouse and pueblo villages occupied by early farmers of the Southwest, quarry sites where materials for stone tools were obtained, and caves and shrines used for rituals and ceremonies.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2 Stage 1 Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent
    Wessex Archaeology Kingsborough Manor Phase 2 Stage 1 Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent Assessment of Archaeological Excavation Results Ref: 57170.01 October 2005 KINGSBOROUGH MANOR PHASE 2 STAGE 1 EASTCHURCH, ISLE OF SHEPPEY, KENT Assessment of Archaeological Excavation Results Prepared on behalf of Jones Homes (Southern) Ltd 3 White Oak Square Swanley Kent BR8 7AG by Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park Salisbury SP4 6EB Report reference: 57170.01 October 2005 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2005 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 KINGSBOROUGH MANOR PHASE 2 STAGE 1 EASTCHURCH, ISLE OF SHEPPEY, KENT SUMMARY Wessex Archaeology was commissioned by Jones Homes (Southern) Ltd to conduct archaeological excavations on land associated with Phase 2 Stage 1 of an ongoing, low- density housing development. The Phase 2 Stage 1 site was located north east of Kingsborough Farm, Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey, Kent, and to the north west of Kingsborough Manor housing development Phase 1 (Fig. 1). Work was undertaken between July and September 2004 and was carried out as a condition of planning permission for the development granted by Swale District Council and pursuant to a specification issued by the Heritage Conservation Group of Kent County Council. This report provides a brief summary of the excavation results. The Site (NGR 597725 172394) comprised an area of land totalling approximately 15,759m² and was located to the north of Kingsborough Farm, 2km south-east of Minster and c. 1.25km to the north-west of the village of Eastchurch, Isle of Sheppey. It occupies an elevated position on the Isle of Sheppey, close to the north eastern edge of a ridge extending east-west along the island, with commanding views to the north and east over the Thames and the Essex coast.
    [Show full text]
  • The North American Postclassic Oikoumene: AD 900–1200 63 by Peter N
    Comparative Archaeologies The American Southwest (AD 900–1600) and the Iberian Peninsula (3000–1500 BC) Edited by Katina T. Lillios Comparative Archaeologies Comparative Archaeologies The American Southwest (AD 900–1600) and the Iberian Peninsula (3000–1500 BC) edited by Katina T. Lillios Oxbow Books Oxford & Oakville Published by Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK This book is available direct from Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK (Phone 01865-241249; Fax 01865-794449) and The David Brown Book Company PO Box 511, Oakville, CT 06779, USA (Phone 860-945-9329; Fax 860-945-9468) or from our website www.oxbowbooks.com @ 2011 by Katina T. Lillios ISBN: 978-1-935488-26-2 Cataloging data available from the Library of Congress. A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library. Text type 11 pt Minion Pro Display type Gill Sans Printed in the United States on acid-free paper. Contents List of Illustrations vii List of Tables viii Preface ix 1 Comparative Archaeology: Archaeology’s Responsibility 1 by Timothy Earle 2 Bridging Histories: The Archaeology of Chaco and Los Millares 21 by Stephen H. Lekson and Pedro Díaz-del-Río 3 The Southwest, Iberia, and their Worlds 25 by Stephen H. Lekson 4 Labor in the Making of Iberian Copper Age Lineages 37 by Pedro Díaz-del-Río 5 Bridging Landscapes 57 by Peter N. Peregrine and Leonardo García Sanjuán 6 The North American Postclassic Oikoumene: AD 900–1200 63 by Peter N. Peregrine 7 Transformations, Invocations, Echoes, Resistance: The Assimilation of the Past in Southern Iberia (5th to 1st Millennia BC) 81 by Leonardo García Sanjuán 8 Bridging Bodies 103 by Ventura R.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsmac Spring 2020
    NewsMAC Spring 2020 NewsMAC Newsletter of the New Mexico Archeological Council P.O. Box 25691 Albuquerque, NM 87125 NewsMAC Spring 2020 (2020-1) Contents PRESIDENT’S WELCOME 1 EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION 2 PROGRESS UPDATE: ANCESTRAL PUEBLO AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPES PROJECT 3 Kaitlyn E. Davis, Ph.D. Candidate, University of Colorado, Boulder RADIOCARBON DATING OF A THERMAL FEATURE AT A TIPI RING SITE AT THE 4 DEHAVEN RANCH AND PRESERVE Emily J. Brown, Aspen CRM Consulting – NMAC Grant Recipient INVESTIGATIONS ON THE BOX CANYON VILLAGE SITE (LA 4980), AN ANIMAS PHASE VILLAGE IN HIDALGO COUNTY, NM 11 Thatcher A. Rogers, University of New Mexico – NMAC Grant Recipient THE AZOTEA PEAK RING MIDDEN SURVEY: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE OF SUBSISTENCE AND FEASTING AROUND THE AZOTEA MESA, EDDY COUNTY, NM 16 Ryan Scott Hechler, Statistical Research, Inc. DATA RECOVERY AT SEVEN SITES SOUTH OF SANTA FE FOR NM GAS CO. Kye Miller, PaleoWest 20 SOUTH BY SOUTHWEST: ARCHAEOLOGICAL DICHOTOMIES, ORTHODOXIES, AND 21 HETERODOXIES IN THE MOGOLLON OR WERE THOSE MIGRANTS PROPERLY DOCUMENTED? Marc Thompson 28 REPORT ON 2019 NMAC FALL CONFERENCE: COLLABORATIVE ARCHAEOLOGY, INDIGENOUS ARCHAEOLOGY, AND TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES Michael Spears NMAC CONTACTS 30 NewsMAC Spring 2020 President’s Welcome Greetings all and welcome to this pandemic issue of NewsMAC. I want to say thank you to Tamara Jager Stewart for volunteering to fill our newsletter editor vacancy this year, and working with our NMAC Past President Kye Miller to get this issue out to the membership during this busy and stressful time for all of us. I hope everyone is healthy and safe, and dealing well with the challenges of teleworking, videoconferencing, and Zoom-meeting fatigue—or the even greater challenges of safely conducting fieldwork during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavations at the Green Lizard Site, Pp. 69-77
    Excavations at the Green Liza_rd Site . Edgar K. Huber and William D. Lipe Introduction than Sand Canyon Pueblo, or was abandoned before the end of occupation at the larger site, does comparison of he Green Lizard site (5MT3901) is a small, Pueblo III artifacts and ecofacts from the two sites provide evidence T habitation site located in the middle reaches of Sand that may help us understand the shift from a dispersed to Canyon, approximately 1 km down canyon from Sand an aggregated settlement pattern and/or the eventual aban­ Canyon Pueblo (Figure 1.3). In the summers of 1987 and donment of the Sand Canyon locality? 1988, intensive excavation was carried out in the western In planning for the Green Lizard excavations, we de­ half of the site. A kiva, an adjacent masonry· roomblock, cided to excavate a full kiva suite (kiva and associated and the floors of several jacal structures were excavated; surface rooms) to obtain a data set fully comparable to those the midden lying to the south of these features was sampled being produced by the intensive excavations of kiva suites with test pits (Figure 6~ 1). at Sand Canyon Pueblo (Bradley, this volume; see also The Green Lizard site Was first recorded by Craw Adams 1985a; Bradley 1986, 1987, 1988a, 1990; Kleidon Canyon Center researchers in 1984 (Adams 1985a). The and Bradley 1989). layout of the site is essentially two adjacent Prudden units (Prudden 1903, 1914, 1918). It consists of two kivas, Environmental Setting approximately 20 more or less contiguous, masonry-walled surface rooms, and an extensive and reJatively deep midden The Green Lizard site is located within Sand Canyon on a deposit located to the south of the structures (Figure 6.1).
    [Show full text]