DOCSLIB.ORG

Neutrino Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neutrino Book The challenge of neutrinos Preparing the Gargamelle bubble chamber at CERN in 1969. In 1973 the chamber took the first historic photographs of neutral current interactions. (Photo CERN 409.9.69) Neutrino book Gargamelle and Neutral Currents - The Story of a Vital Discovery by Andre Rousset Andre Rousset's book (in French - Gargamelle et les Courants Neutres - Ecole des Mines de Paris) tells the story of Gargamelle and the discov­ ery at CERN in 1973 of neutral currents, the cornerstone of the electroweak theory. This vital discov­ ery helped to give credence to the Standard Model of particle physics. Rousset is both an observer and one of the key figures in the story. His book is lively and well docu­ mented; in it he uses archive material to ensure the accuracy of his infor­ mation on dates, choices and deci­ sions. ously" to the project was probably in an interesting manner the theo­ After an introduction to particle what swung the decision. rists' "green light", giving the go- physics which puts into perspective Construction took five years, during ahead to the experimentalists. In fact, the electroweak theory unifying weak which many problems were encoun­ the European collaboration (Aachen, and electromagnetic interactions, tered, right up to the fault in the main Brussels, CERN, Ecole Polytechni­ Rousset comes straight to the point. part of the chamber which caused que, Milan, Orsay, UC London) was From the late 1950s onwards he was delays and, a few years later, was to divided between a study of the quark- involved in the construction of the prove fatal to the detector. As parton model, research into the first heavy liquid bubble chambers by Rousset correctly states, Gargamelle intermediate boson... and research the BP1, BP2 and BP3 teams at the was probably the first big detector into neutral currents. Ecole Polytechnique in Paris. For designed to be built on industrial Gargamelle's first data were taken Gargamelle a bigger laboratory was lines, in direct cooperation with at the CERN PS (the SPS not yet needed, and it was at the CEA industry. The reward: the first neu­ being in operation), and the average (French Atomic Energy Commission) trino interaction was photographed energy of the neutrinos was only a in Saclay that the chamber was on 28 January 1971. few GeV. In a muon-neutrino interac­ designed by teams from the Saturne While it was clear that neutrino tion, either there is a muon among accelerator and the Ecole Polytech­ physics was Gargamelle's main goal the final particles and it is said that nique. However, the decision to build from the start, it was not obvious to there is a W exchange interaction Gargamelle was taken in 1965 all the physicists in the collaboration (charged current), or there is a muon through the impetus of Andre Lagarri- once the detector had been built that neutrino in the final state and there is gue, in defiance of the normal CERN the primary objective was research a Z exchange interaction (neutral procedures. Gargamelle was then in into neutral currents. Rousset points current). Neither the W nor the Z competition with the other big bubble out that the key role played by particles were known in 1972 and chamber project, BEBC; was it really neutral currents in electroweak one of Gargamelle's goals was necessary to build two big cham­ unification did not come to the fore precisely the identification of the W bers? The decision by Francis Perrin until 1971, when Gargamelle went particle (an impossible task, as we and the CEA to contribute "gener­ into operation. Here, he emphasises now know, since the PS did not 40 CERN Courier, September 1995 The challenge of neutrinos produce the required energy). it was easier to differentiate neutron that really to be expected from such The first neutral current event was interactions, the great neutral current an enthusiastic and ardent observer/ identified in early 1973 in Aachen. simulators, from neutrino interac­ participant? This was a leptonic neutral current, tions. However, the detector was not In conclusion, one may be sorry, where a muon neutrino scatters off easy to understand either. The like Rousset, that this important an electron, which crosses the HPWF's first results came hot on the discovery was not rewarded by a chamber in a very specific way. heels of the Gargamelle announce­ Nobel Prize. This can probably be However, Andre Rousset somewhat ment. There were fewer neutral ascribed to the early death of Andre disregards leptonic neutral currents, currents, which disappeared alto­ Lagarrigue, the father of Gargamelle, to which he considers history has gether a few weeks later... only to in 1974, followed by the death of paid too much attention. May we be reappear at the beginning of 1974. Paul Musset in an accident in 1985. allowed to disagree, since the beauty This episode of "alternating" neutral The collective scientific venture of the picture is undeniable? currents worried... or kept the com­ which led to the discovery of neutral With perspicuity, Rousset expands munity entertained, for several currents is a wonderful story, to on research into hadronic neutral months. which Andre Rousset makes a very currents, where the final state com­ It was at the London Conference in important contribution. Supplemented prises an escaping neutrino and July 1974 that the existence of by Peter Galison's article ("How the hadrons. The difficulty is in separat­ neutral currents was conclusively first neutral current experiments ing such an interaction from that established and accepted by the ended", Review of Modern Physics which could be produced by the scientific community. Even today 55 (1983) 477), it will make a fasci­ interaction of a neutron from the Rousset asks whether neutral cur­ nating read (in French) for all those immediate chamber surroundings. rents had really been observed. This who want to know the details of this Rousset gives a descriptive and question, which is to his credit as a famous chapter in the history of detailed account of this complicated scrupulous physicist, may seem contemporary physics. and painstaking work, without losing surprising; however, there was sight of the main points. clearly no choice at the time: neutral By Michel Spiro The first half of 1973 was highly currents had been predicted, even emotionally charged for the collabo­ expected, by theory, and were by far ration, which took time to understand the most simple interpretation of the data and finalize its analyses. Gargamelle's results. The sociological aspect of the col­ There are few reservations about laboration was also examined. The Rousset's work. The book contains a (Michel Spiro, Michel Cribier and announcement of the discovery was few minor but unimportant errors (the Daniel Vigaud are the authors of a finally made by Paul Musset at chlorine solar neutrino detector was new book la lumiere des neutrinos', CERN on 19 July 1973 and the two built in South Dakota and not Utah). published by Editions du Seuil, Paris. papers were published in Physics A little more information on the A review of this book will appear in a Letters on 3 September. Musset had discussion surrounding the possible forthcoming issue.) been the central figure during the existence of neutral currents in the construction period and had played a small chambers before Gargamelle coordinating role in the analysis would have been welcome, and a work. comparison of Gargamelle's results Andre Rousset does not overlook with the present parameter values the competition: at Fermilab, in the would have provided a useful per­ United States, the 'HPWF collabora­ spective. Furthermore, it is perhaps tion placed its 60 tonne neutrino regrettable that Rousset does not detector alongside the new 400 GeV always adopt the necessary detach­ accelerator, which went into opera­ ment, particularly when referring to tion in 1972. The neutrino energy the rival experiment in the United was several tens of GeV and a priori States at Fermilab (HPWF), but is 42 CERN Courier, September 1995 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiochemical Solar Neutrino Experiments, "Successful and Otherwise"
    BNL-81686-2008-CP Radiochemical Solar Neutrino Experiments, "Successful and Otherwise" R. L. Hahn Presented at the Proceedings of the Neutrino-2008 Conference Christchurch, New Zealand May 25 - 31, 2008 September 2008 Chemistry Department Brookhaven National Laboratory P.O. Box 5000 Upton, NY 11973-5000 www.bnl.gov Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. This preprint is intended for publication in a journal or proceedings. Since changes may be made before publication, it may not be cited or reproduced without the author’s permission. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity Study and First Prototype Tests for the CHIPS Neutrino
    Sensitivity study and first prototype tests for the CHIPS neutrino detector R&D program Maciej Marek Pfützner University College London Submitted to University College London in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 20, 2018 1 2 Declaration I, Maciej Marek Pfützner confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Maciej Pfützner 3 4 Abstract CHIPS (CHerenkov detectors In mine PitS) is an R&D project aiming to develop novel cost-effective detectors for long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments. Water Cherenkov detector modules will be submerged in an existing lake in the path of an accelerator neutrino beam, eliminating the need for expensive excavation. In a staged approach, the first detectors will be deployed in a flooded mine pit in northern Minnesota, 7 mrad off-axis from the existing NuMI beam. A small proof-of-principle model (CHIPS-M) has already been tested and the first stage of a fully functional 10 kt module (CHIPS-10) is planned for 2018. The main physics aim is to measure the CP-violating neutrino mixing phase (δCP). A sensitivity study was performed with the GLoBES package, using results from a dedicated detector simulation and a preliminary reconstruction algorithm. The predicted physics reach of CHIPS-10 and potential bigger modules is presented and compared with currently running experiments and future projects. One of the instruments submerged on board CHIPS-M in autumn 2015 was a prototype detection unit, constructed at Nikhef.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mislivec, Minerva Coherent
    Charged Current Coherent Pion Production in MINERνA Aaron Mislivec University of Rochester w/ Aaron Higuera Outline • Motivation • MINERνA Detector and Kinematics Reconstruction • Event Selection • Background Tuning • Contribution from Diffractive Scattering off Hydrogen • Systematics • Cross Sections Aaron Mislivec, University of Rochester NuInt14 2 K. HIRAIDE et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D 78, 112004 (2008) 100 TABLE III. Event selection summary for the MRD-stopped DATA charged current coherent pion sample. CC coherent π Event selection Data MC Coherent % CC resonant π Signal BG Efficiency Other Generated in SciBar fid.vol. 1939 156 766 100% CC QE 50 SciBar-MRD matched 30 337 978 29 359 50.4% MRD-stopped 21 762 715 20 437 36.9% two-track 5939 358 6073 18.5% Entries / 5 degrees Particle ID (" %) 2255 292 2336 15.1% Vertex activityþ cut 887 264 961 13.6% CCQE rejection 682 241 709 12.4% 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Pion track direction cut 425 233 451 12.0% Reconstructed Q2 cut 247 201 228 10.4% ∆θp (degrees) FIG. 11 (color online). Á for the " % events in the MRD p þ stopped sample after fitting. which the track angle of the pion candidate with respect to the beam direction is less than 90 degrees are selected. Figure 13 shows the reconstructed Q2 distribution for the " % events after the pion track direction cut. Althoughþ a charged current quasielastic interaction is as- DATA 80 sumed, the Q2 of charged current coherent pion events is CC coherent π reconstructed with a resolution of 0:016 GeV=c 2 and a CC resonant π 2 ð Þ 60 shift of 0:024 GeV=c according to the MC simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Lightweight Dark Matter in Nova Near Detector
    Searching for Lightweight Dark Matter in NOvA Near Detector PoS(FPCP2017)056 Filip Jediný* Czech Technical University in Prague Brehova 7, Prague, Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected] Athanasios Hatzikoutelis University of Tennessee Knoxville Knoxville, TN, USA E-mail: [email protected] Sergey Kotelnikov Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Kirk and Pine st., Batavia, IL, USA E-mail: [email protected] Biao Wang Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX, USA E-mail: [email protected] The NOvA long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment is receiving record numbers of 120GeV protons on target from Fermilab's NuMI neutrino beam. We take advantage of our experiment’s sophisticated particle identification algorithms to search for Lightweight Dark Matter (LDM) in the first year of data from the Near Detector of NOvA (300-ton low-Z mass, placed off the beam axis) during the experiment’s first physics runs. Theoretical models of LDM predict that bellow- 10GeV candidates produced in the NuMI target might scatter or decay in the NOvA Near Detector. We simulate an example of the Neutral Vector Portal model with the sensitivity estimate of 10-39 cm2, which corresponds to O(10) LDM candidates per three years of data, looking at single electromagnetic showers between 5 and 15 GeV in a model independent way. The 15th International Conference on Flavor Physics & CP Violation 5-9 June, 2017 Prague, Czech Republic * Speaker Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). http://pos.sissa.it/ Searching for LDM in NOvA ND Filip Jediný 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Neutrinos, 1930 − 1985
    The History of Neutrinos, 1930 − 1985. What have we Learned About Neutrinos? What have we Learned Using Neutrinos? J. Steinberger Prepared for “25th International Conference On Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics”, Kyoto (Japan), June 2012 1 2 3 4 The detector of the experiment of Conversi, Pancini and Piccioni, 1946, 5 which showed that the mesotron is not the Yukawa particle. Detector with 80 Geiger counters. The muon decay spectrum is continuous. My thesis experiment, under Fermi, which showed that the muon decays into two neutral particles, plus the electron. Fermi, myself and others, in 1954, at a summer school in Varenna, lake Como, a few months before Fermi’s untimely disappearance. 6 Demonstration of the Neutrino In 1956 Cowan and Reines detected antineutrinos from a nuclear reactor, reacting with protons in liquid scintillator which also contained cadmium, observing the positron as well as the scattering of the neutron on cadmium. 7 The Electron and Muon Neutrinos are Different. 1. G. Feinberg, 1958. 2. B. Pontecorvo, 1959. 3. M. Schwartz (T.D. Lee), 1959 4. Higher energy accelerators, Courant, Livingston and Snyder. Pontecorvo 8 9 A C B D Spark chamber and counter arrangement. A are triggering counters, Energy spectra of neutrinos B, C and D are anticoincidence counters from pion and kaon decays. 10 Event with penetrating muon and hadron shower 11 The group of the 2nd neutrino experiment in 1962: J.S., Goulianos, Gaillard, Mistry, Danby, technician whose name I have forgotten, Lederman and Schwartz. 12 Same group, 26 years later, at Nobel ceremony in Stockholm. 13 Discovery of partons, nucleon structure, scaling, in deep inelastic scattering of electrons on protons at SLAC in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of the + ̅ Charged Current Inclusive Cross Section
    Measurement of the �! + �!̅ Charged Current Inclusive Cross Section on Argon in MicroBooNE Krishan Mistry on behalf of the MicroBooNE Collaboration 15 March 2021 New Directions in Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (NDNN) NuSTEC Workshop ICARUS T600 MicroBooNE SBND Importance of the �!-Ar cross section • MicroBooNE + SBN Program + DUNE ⇥ Employ Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers (LArTPCs) arXiv:1503.01520 [physics.ins-det] • Primary signal channel for these experiments is �!– Ar CC interactions arXiv:2002.03005 [hep-ex] 15 March 2021 K Mistry 2 Building a Picture of �! Interactions ArgoNeuT is the first A handful of measurements measurement made on on other nuclei in the argon hundred MeV to GeV range ⇥ Sample of 13 selected events Nuclear Physics B 133, 205 – 219 (1978) Phys. Rev. D 102, 011101(R) (2020) ⇥ Gargamelle Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 241803 (2014) ⇥ Phys. Rev. D 91, 112010 (2015) T2K J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 114 (2020) ⇥ MINER�A Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 081802 (2016) !! " !! " Argon Other 15 March 2021 K Mistry 3 What are we measuring? ! /!̅ " # • Total �!+ �!̅ Charged Current (CC) ! ! $ /$ inclusive cross section • Signature: the neutrino event ? contains at least one electron-liKe shower Ar ⇥ No requirements on the presence (or absence) of any additional particle ⇥ Do not differentiate between �! and �!̅ Inclusive channel is the most straightforward channel to compare to predictions 15 March 2021 K Mistry 4 MicroBooNE • Measurement is performed • Features of a LArTPC using the MicroBooNE detector: LArTPC ⇥ Precise calorimetry ⇥ 4�
    [Show full text]
  • Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis of Matter-Dependent Neutrino Oscillation Models
    Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis of Matter-Dependent Neutrino Oscillation Models Kiyoshi Keola Shiraishi A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2006 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Physics University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a doctoral dissertation by Kiyoshi Keola Shiraishi and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Chair of the Supervisory Committee: R. Jeffrey Wilkes Reading Committee: R. Jeffrey Wilkes Thompson Burnett Ann Nelson Cecilia Lunardini Date: In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the doctoral degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for copying or reproduction of this dissertation may be referred to Proquest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346, 1-800-521-0600, to whom the author has granted “the right to reproduce and sell (a) copies of the manuscript in microform and/or (b) printed copies of the manuscript made from microform.” Signature Date University of Washington Abstract Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Analysis of Matter-Dependent Neutrino Oscillation Models Kiyoshi Keola Shiraishi Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor R. Jeffrey Wilkes Physics Current data finds that the atmospheric neutrino anomaly is best explained with ν µ − ντ neutrino oscillations.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF) Submittals Are Preferred) and Information Particle and Astroparticle Physics As Well As Accelerator Physics
    CERNNovember/December 2019 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the November/December 2019 issue of CERN Courier. The Extremely Large Telescope, adorning the cover of this issue, is due to EXTREMELY record first light in 2025 and will outperform existing telescopes by orders of magnitude. It is one of several large instruments to look forward to in the decade ahead, which will also see the start of high-luminosity LHC operations. LARGE TELESCOPE As the 2020s gets under way, the Courier will be reviewing the LHC’s 10-year physics programme so far, as well as charting progress in other domains. In the meantime, enjoy news of KATRIN’s first limit on the neutrino mass (p7), a summary of the recently published European strategy briefing book (p8), the genesis of a hadron-therapy centre in Southeast Europe (p9), and dispatches from the most interesting recent conferences (pp19—23). CLIC’s status and future (p41), the abstract world of gauge–gravity duality (p44), France’s particle-physics origins (p37) and CERN’s open days (p32) are other highlights from this last issue of the decade. Enjoy! To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier KATRIN weighs in on neutrinos Maldacena on the gauge–gravity dual FPGAs that speak your language EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING CCNovDec19_Cover_v1.indd 1 29/10/2019 15:41 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • 01Ii Beam Line
    STA N FO RD LIN EA R A C C ELERA TO R C EN TER Fall 2001, Vol. 31, No. 3 CONTENTS A PERIODICAL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS FALL 2001 VOL. 31, NUMBER 3 Guest Editor MICHAEL RIORDAN Editors RENE DONALDSON, BILL KIRK Contributing Editors GORDON FRASER JUDY JACKSON, AKIHIRO MAKI MICHAEL RIORDAN, PEDRO WALOSCHEK Editorial Advisory Board PATRICIA BURCHAT, DAVID BURKE LANCE DIXON, EDWARD HARTOUNI ABRAHAM SEIDEN, GEORGE SMOOT HERMAN WINICK Illustrations TERRY ANDERSON Distribution CRYSTAL TILGHMAN The Beam Line is published quarterly by the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Box 4349, Stanford, CA 94309. Telephone: (650) 926-2585. EMAIL: [email protected] FAX: (650) 926-4500 Issues of the Beam Line are accessible electroni- cally on the World Wide Web at http://www.slac. stanford.edu/pubs/beamline. SLAC is operated by Stanford University under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy. The opinions of the authors do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Cover: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detects neutrinos from the sun. This interior view from beneath the detector shows the acrylic vessel containing 1000 tons of heavy water, surrounded by photomultiplier tubes. (Courtesy SNO Collaboration) Printed on recycled paper 2 FOREWORD 32 THE ENIGMATIC WORLD David O. Caldwell OF NEUTRINOS Trying to discern the patterns of neutrino masses and mixing. FEATURES Boris Kayser 42 THE K2K NEUTRINO 4 PAULI’S GHOST EXPERIMENT A seventy-year saga of the conception The world’s first long-baseline and discovery of neutrinos. neutrino experiment is beginning Michael Riordan to produce results. Koichiro Nishikawa & Jeffrey Wilkes 15 MINING SUNSHINE The first results from the Sudbury 50 WHATEVER HAPPENED Neutrino Observatory reveal TO HOT DARK MATTER? the “missing” solar neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • 48. Neutrino Cross Section Measurements 1 48
    48. Neutrino Cross Section Measurements 1 48. Neutrino Cross Section Measurements Revised October 2013 by G.P. Zeller (Fermilab) Neutrino interaction cross sections are an essential ingredient in all neutrino experiments. Interest in neutrino scattering has recently increased due to the need for such information in the interpretation of neutrino oscillation data. Historically, neutrino scattering results on both charged current (CC) and neutral current (NC) interaction channels have been collected over many decades using a variety of targets, analysis techniques, and detector technologies. With the advent of intense neutrino sources constructed for neutrino oscillation investigations, experiments are now remeasuring these cross sections with a renewed appreciation for nuclear effects† and the importance of improved neutrino flux estimates. This work summarizes accelerator-based neutrino cross section measurements performed in the ∼ 0.1 − 300 GeV range with an emphasis on inclusive, quasi-elastic, and single-pion production processes, areas where we have the most experimental input at present (Table 48.1). For a more comprehensive discussion of neutrino cross sections, including neutrino-electron elastic scattering and lower energy measurements, the reader is directed to a recent review of this subject [1]. Here, we survey existing experimental data on neutrino interactions and do not attempt to provide a census of the associated theoretical calculations, of which there are many. Table 48.1: Summary of modern accelerator-based experiments
    [Show full text]
  • Calibration and Monitoring for the Borexino Solar Neutrino Experiment
    Calibration and Monitoring for the Borexino Solar Neutrino Experiment Dissertation submitted to the Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa for the degree of Ph.D. in Physics by José Carvalho Maneira Advisors: Prof. Amélia Maio Prof. Gianpaolo Bellini (University of Milan) Lisbon, November 2001 To my parents and my brother. “The first question I ask myself when something doesn't seem to be beautiful is why do I think it's not beautiful. And very shortly you discover that there is no reason.” John Cage Summary One of the major open issues in Elementary Particle Physics today, the phenomenon of Neutrino Oscillations is a natural consequence of a non-zero neutrino mass and a non-diagonal leptonic mixing matrix. Even if the Standard Model extension to accommodate neutrino oscillations is relatively trivial, a non- zero neutrino mass and mixing is widely considered as a doorway for the Unified Theory of the fundamental interactions. In fact, Super Symmetry naturally explains small neutrino masses through the well-known “see-saw” mechanism. From the experimental point of view, neutrino oscillations are a privileged way of studying the neutrino mass spectrum, since small mass splittings can lead to large and measurable phase differences between interfering quantum-mechanical amplitudes. This is particularly true for Solar Neutrino Experiments, since the large distance between source and detector (1.5´1011 m) allows for a good sensitivity to very small mass differences (down to about 10-11 eV2), not available with the present accelerator and reactor experiments. In fact, the first indication for the possibility of Neutrino Oscillations came from the first measurements of Solar Neutrinos, more than thirty years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Gigantic Japanese Detector Seeks Supernova Neutrinos Tracing the History of Exploding Stars Is a Goal of the Revamped Super-Kamiokande
    NEWS IN FOCUS ASAHI SHIMBUN/GETTY Observations by the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector have forced theorists to amend the standard model of particle physics. PHYSICS Gigantic Japanese detector seeks supernova neutrinos Tracing the history of exploding stars is a goal of the revamped Super-Kamiokande. BY DAVIDE CASTELVECCHI weight. These data will help astronomers to detector much better at distinguishing between better understand the history of supernovae different types, or ‘flavours’, of neutrino, as well leven thousand giant orange eyes in the Universe — but the neutrinos that the as their antiparticles, antineutrinos. confront the lucky few who have explosions emit have been difficult to detect. In 1987, the Kamiokande detector, Super-K’s entered the Super-Kamiokande under- “Every 2–3 seconds, a supernova goes off smaller predecessor, detected the first neutri- Eground neutrino observatory in Japan — by somewhere in the Universe, and it produces nos from a supernova. The dozen neutrinos far the largest neutrino detector of its kind in 1058 neutrinos,” says Masayuki Nakahata, came from Supernova 1987A, which occurred the world. A chance to see these light sensors who heads the Super-K, an international col- in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small galaxy is rare because they are usually submerged in laboration led by Japan and the United States. that orbits the Milky Way. Head experimenter 50,000 tonnes of purified water. But a major With the upgrade, the detector should be able Masatoshi Koshiba shared the 2002 Nobel revamp of Super-K that was completed in to count a few of these ‘relic’ neutrinos every physics prize partly for that discovery.
    [Show full text]