Horizontal Gene Transfer in Eukaryotic Algal Evolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Horizontal Gene Transfer in Eukaryotic Algal Evolution COMMENTARY Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic algal evolution Jason Raymond and Robert E. Blankenship* Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1604 lthough seemingly innocuous, ther complexities in transcription and multiple times is also made clear in that the power of something as sim- translation, such as the need for correct it has occurred in various lineages after ple as a drop of water, given a splicing of RNA transcripts replete with the radiation of the three flavors of pri- few millions of years over introns. It can also be argued that sexual mary algae (red, green, and glaucocysto- Awhich to act continually, is immediately reproduction affords many eukaryotes phyte), leading to secondary algae with and awe-inspiringly obvious to someone the same advantage gained through quite varying plastid phenotypes. In pri- peering over the edge of the Grand HGT in bacteria. In this issue of PNAS, mary and secondary endosymbiosis Canyon. Acting over a similarly im- Archibald et al. (5) leap beyond the there has been a massive loss of genes mense time period but on vastly differ- case-by-case examples that typify eu- from the endosymbiont genome, many ent scales, this massive effect from a karyotic HGT and demonstrate that of which have been transferred into the weak, but constant, force embodies how HGT has played a significant role in the host genome, with each host-encoded natural selection has been able to direct evolution of a eukaryotic alga. In a col- plasmid-targeted gene now carrying a the evolution of once primitive, mal- lective analysis of 78 plastid-targeted transit peptide sequence that directs it adapted biological structures to the re- proteins from this alga, they show that, back to the plastid (secondary endosym- markable and almost inconceivably di- even by conservative measures, Ϸ21% biont-directed proteins also carry an verse molecular machines found within of these genes have likely been acquired additional signal sequence to get them extant organisms. This idea of natural by HGT. Their result stands to signifi- through the vestigial membrane system selection as a slow-and-steady workhorse cantly expand the number of established of the original plastid host) (14). Two was central to Charles Darwin’s evolu- cases of so-called transdomain HGT oc- groups of algae that evolved through tionary synthesis, as epitomized in his curring between prokaryotes and eu- secondary endosymbiosis, the crypto- oft-repeated pre´cis ‘‘Natura non facit karyotes and bolsters some novel ideas mondads and chlorarachniophytes (in- saltum,’’ Nature does not make leaps. on evolutionary mechanisms in phago- cluding B. natans) are particularly inter- Darwin would not live to see the discov- cytic eukaryotes (6). esting because they still contain a relict ery of genes as the vessel of inheritance The subject, Bigelowiella natans,isa nucleus called a nucleomorph, dramati- and random mutation as the propagator member of a class of algae known as cally reduced in size, from the originally of change, although these breakthroughs chlorarachniophytes that, in and of it- engulfed algae (10). would serve to reinforce his prescient self, is quite an evolutionary enigma. All Additional transfer of genes has un- ideas. plastid-containing eukaryotes acquired doubtedly occurred from the relict nu- To the contrary, the discovery of hor- the ability to do photosynthesis when, cleus into the host genome (15), al- izontal gene transfer (HGT) as a signifi- perhaps Ϸ2 billion years ago, a primitive though despite these complex transfer cant evolutionary driver may require an eukaryote engulfed a photosynthetic events these genes in the host genome addendum to the Darwinian synthesis. cyanobacterium. This so-called primary should have a phylogenetic signal consis- A growing body of evidence indicates endosymbiotic event gave early eu- tent with the engulfed algae and thus that many organisms, particularly pro- karyotes an extremely powerful meta- should be grouped more broadly with karyotes, can and do make evolutionary bolic ability that previously was manifest cyanobacteria. Genes present in the host leaps by sharing genes with one another, only among photosynthetic bacteria, and before endosymbiosis should cluster thereby opening a back door to an ad- also constituted, along with the enslave- with other eukaryotic genes and thereby aptation or ability that was already fine- ment of a proteobacterium that would can be used to classify the original host. tuned within another organism. Once become the mitochondrion, a massive For most nuclear-encoded algal genes thought to be an explanation of last re- horizontal transfer of genes into a prim- these stratifications are indeed observed, sort when the data were not robust itive eukaryote. The modern progeny of and in B. natans a variety of evidence enough to give unambiguous results, this primitive photosynthetic eukaryote clearly indicates a green algal endosym- with the recent availability of a wealth point to a single primary endosymbiotic biont origin. However, as Archibald of whole-genome data, HGT has not event, although some evidence argues et al. (5) show, many of the plastid- only become respectable but has otherwise (e.g., refs. 7 and 8). It is also targeted genes from B. natans clearly emerged as a central force in the evolu- certainly feasible that endosymbiosis diverge from this expectation. These tion of many different prokaryotes occurred multiple times, but many or- horizontally transferred genes span a (1–3). Of course, this idea came as ganisms were wiped out in the bottle- varied swath of functions, including no major surprise to many bacterial neck of subsequent global catastrophes chlorophyll biosynthesis, carbon fixation, geneticists, who for decades have been (e.g., global glaciations, refs. 9–11). and ribosome structure, and cluster with selecting prokaryotes for their ability to Not to be left behind, some eu- a similarly broad range of taxa other take up and express exogenous genes (as karyotes acquired photosynthesis than green algae. Several of their trees, Oswald Avery did some 60 years ago, through the same mechanism, although which, importantly, encompass much of demonstrating that DNA was the carrier not by engulfing a cyanobacterium but the available taxonomic sampling for of genetic information) (4). rather a eukaryotic alga (10, 12). each sequence, are particularly robust The impact of HGT on eukaryote ge- Termed secondary endosymbiosis, this based on bootstrap values and con- nomes has not been so clear-cut (3). process is believed to have given rise to served sequence motifs, providing strong The species concept of genetically segre- multiple independent groups of photo- gated germ lines has been tied to eu- synthetic organisms, all of which bear karyote taxonomy since its inception, the hallmark of plastids with three or See companion paper on page 7678. and the barriers against HGT in bacte- more bounding membranes (13). That *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ria are magnified in eukaryotes by fur- secondary endosymbiosis has occurred [email protected]. www.pnas.org͞cgi͞doi͞10.1073͞pnas.1533212100 PNAS ͉ June 24, 2003 ͉ vol. 100 ͉ no. 13 ͉ 7419–7420 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 mid analog exists in eukaryotes, Archibald et al. suggest that HGT in B. natans may occur in the same way it has for the many endosymbiotic events that have happened over the past 2 billion years, by engulfing other organisms (Fig. 1). Compared with the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, which is photoautotrophic and in which no paral- lel evidence of HGT is found, B. natans is mixotrophic, meaning that it can live phagocytotically and photosynthetically. Models have been proposed whereby small snippets of DNA from an en- gulfed microbe are able to escape diges- tion, e.g., from protist lysozomes, and migrate to and subsequently be incorpo- rated into the host genome (6, 16). One can imagine the series of fleetingly small probability events proceeding from en- gulfment to incorporation of a strand of foreign DNA into the genome to a new gene overcoming genetic drift to be- come fixed in the population. In a cer- Fig. 1. Stepwise conceptual image of one mechanism of HGT that, as proposed by Archibald et al. (5), tain sense, this is the same cumulative might operate in the chlorarachniophyte alga B. natans. Red arrows show phagocytosis and subsequent digestion of a bacterium or protist, from which foreign DNA has survived digestion and become effect as random mutations in single incorporated into the algal nucleus (flow of HGT-acquired genetic information indicated with blue genes or dripping water, but it now op- arrows). Although the genes studied herein by Archibald et al. are directed for function to the plastid, the erates on a different level, an entire significant number of horizontally transferred genes they found may only be the tip of the iceberg in gene. However, the essential point is phagocytic protists such as B. natans. that those probabilities are nonzero and over time have made a significant con- tribution to the genome of this organism support for HGT having played a signif- Most intriguingly, two of the genes from (6). The real boon of Archibald et al.’s icant role in the evolution of this their analysis indicate HGT from differ- hypothesis, perhaps best synopsized by organism. ent bacteria, significant not only as an Ford Doolittle’s epigram ‘‘you are what Because all of the genes studied by example of prokaryote-to-eukaryote you eat’’ (16), is that it is eminently test- Archibald et al. are encoded within the gene transfer but also because these ac- able as more eukaryotic genome data nucleus of B. natans but operate within quired genes initially would have not become available. It is already apparent the plastid, the signal and transit pep- had the proper leader sequence for that the magnitude of HGT varies dra- tides are absolutely necessary.
Recommended publications
  • Provirophages in the Bigelowiella Genome Bear Testimony to Past Encounters with Giant Viruses
    Provirophages in the Bigelowiella genome bear testimony to past encounters with giant viruses Guillaume Blanca,1,2, Lucie Gallot-Lavalléea, and Florian Maumusb,1,2 aLaboratoire Information Génomique et Structurale, UMR7256 (Institut de Microbiologie de la Méditerranée FR3479) CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, 13288 Marseille cedex 9, France; and bINRA, UR1164 Unité de Recherche Génomique-Info, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique de Versailles-Grignon, 78026 Versailles, France Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved July 24, 2015 (received for review April 1, 2015) Virophages are recently discovered double-stranded DNA virus satel- cysteine protease (PRO), and zinc-ribbon domain (ZnR) as well as lites that prey on giant viruses (nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses; major and minor capsid proteins (MCPs and mCPs, respectively) NCLDVs), which are themselves parasites of unicellular eukaryotes. (12). In addition, genes encoding two different families of integrases This coupled parasitism can result in the indirect control of eukaryotic have been identified in several virophages: A putative rve integrase cell mortality by virophages. However, the details of such tripartite was found in Mavirus and ALM (8, 10), whereas Sputnik encodes a ∼ relationships remain largely unexplored. We have discovered 300 putative tyrosine integrase (1). Among virophage genes, only PRO, predicted genes of putative virophage origin in the nuclear genome ATPase, MCP, and mCP support the monophyly of virophages, of the unicellular alga Bigelowiella natans. Physical clustering of these whereas the remaining gene complement shows complex phyloge- genes indicates that virophage genomes are integrated into the B. natans genome. Virophage inserts show high levels of similarity nies suggestive of gene replacement (12).
    [Show full text]
  • New Phylogenomic Analysis of the Enigmatic Phylum Telonemia Further Resolves the Eukaryote Tree of Life
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/403329; this version posted August 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. New phylogenomic analysis of the enigmatic phylum Telonemia further resolves the eukaryote tree of life Jürgen F. H. Strassert1, Mahwash Jamy1, Alexander P. Mylnikov2, Denis V. Tikhonenkov2, Fabien Burki1,* 1Department of Organismal Biology, Program in Systematic Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 2Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Yaroslavl Region, Russia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: TSAR, Telonemia, phylogenomics, eukaryotes, tree of life, protists bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/403329; this version posted August 30, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract The broad-scale tree of eukaryotes is constantly improving, but the evolutionary origin of several major groups remains unknown. Resolving the phylogenetic position of these ‘orphan’ groups is important, especially those that originated early in evolution, because they represent missing evolutionary links between established groups. Telonemia is one such orphan taxon for which little is known. The group is composed of molecularly diverse biflagellated protists, often prevalent although not abundant in aquatic environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Junk DNA
    The Myth of Junk DNA JoATN h A N W ells s eattle Discovery Institute Press 2011 Description According to a number of leading proponents of Darwin’s theory, “junk DNA”—the non-protein coding portion of DNA—provides decisive evidence for Darwinian evolution and against intelligent design, since an intelligent designer would presumably not have filled our genome with so much garbage. But in this provocative book, biologist Jonathan Wells exposes the claim that most of the genome is little more than junk as an anti-scientific myth that ignores the evidence, impedes research, and is based more on theological speculation than good science. Copyright Notice Copyright © 2011 by Jonathan Wells. All Rights Reserved. Publisher’s Note This book is part of a series published by the Center for Science & Culture at Discovery Institute in Seattle. Previous books include The Deniable Darwin by David Berlinski, In the Beginning and Other Essays on Intelligent Design by Granville Sewell, God and Evolution: Protestants, Catholics, and Jews Explore Darwin’s Challenge to Faith, edited by Jay Richards, and Darwin’s Conservatives: The Misguided Questby John G. West. Library Cataloging Data The Myth of Junk DNA by Jonathan Wells (1942– ) Illustrations by Ray Braun 174 pages, 6 x 9 x 0.4 inches & 0.6 lb, 229 x 152 x 10 mm. & 0.26 kg Library of Congress Control Number: 2011925471 BISAC: SCI029000 SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Genetics & Genomics BISAC: SCI027000 SCIENCE / Life Sciences / Evolution ISBN-13: 978-1-9365990-0-4 (paperback) Publisher Information Discovery Institute Press, 208 Columbia Street, Seattle, WA 98104 Internet: http://www.discoveryinstitutepress.com/ Published in the United States of America on acid-free paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction, Symbiosis, and the Eukaryotic Cell
    Reproduction, symbiosis, and the eukaryotic cell Peter Godfrey-Smith1 Philosophy Program, City University of New York Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016; and History and Philosophy of Science Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Edited by W. Ford Doolittle, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, and approved March 27, 2015 (received for review December 30, 2014) This paper develops a conceptual framework for addressing because the pattern of inheritance and the distribution of fitness questions about reproduction, individuality, and the units of differences may cancel, yielding no net change across genera- selection in symbiotic associations, with special attention to the tions (10, 11), but it still is a lucid summary of how Darwinian origin of the eukaryotic cell. Three kinds of reproduction are evolution works. As Lewontin emphasized, many different kinds distinguished, and a possible evolutionary sequence giving rise to of objects—including genes, organelles, cells, demes, and other a mitochondrion-containing eukaryotic cell from an endosymbiotic social groups—can satisfy Darwin’s scheme. All can form pop- partnership is analyzed as a series of transitions between each of ulations of units with variation, heritability, and fitness differ- the three forms of reproduction. The sequence of changes seen in ences. However, this use of the concepts of heritability and fitness this “egalitarian” evolutionary transition is compared with those takes for granted the idea of reproduction and especially the ex- that apply in “fraternal” transitions, such as the evolution of multi- istence of parent–offspring lineages between members of a pop- cellularity in animals. ulation.
    [Show full text]
  • And Periplastid-Targeted Proteins in the Chlorarachniophyte Alga Bigelowiella Natans
    GBE Proteomics Reveals Plastid- and Periplastid-Targeted Proteins in the Chlorarachniophyte Alga Bigelowiella natans Julia F. Hopkins1, David F. Spencer1, Sylvie Laboissiere2, Jonathan A.D. Neilson3,RobertJ.M.Eveleigh1, Dion G. Durnford3, Michael W. Gray1, and John M. Archibald1,* 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada 2Proteomics Unit, McGill University and Ge´nome Que´bec Innovation Centre, Quebec, Canada 3Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick, Canada *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]. Accepted: November 29, 2012 Abstract Chlorarachniophytes are unicellular marine algae with plastids (chloroplasts) of secondary endosymbiotic origin. Chlorarachniophyte cells retain the remnant nucleus (nucleomorph) and cytoplasm (periplastidial compartment, PPC) of the green algal endosymbiont from which their plastid was derived. To characterize the diversity of nucleus-encoded proteins targeted to the chlorarachniophyte plastid, nucleomorph, and PPC, we isolated plastid–nucleomorph complexes from the model chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans and subjected them to high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Our proteomic analysis, the first of its kind for a nucleomorph-bearing alga, resulted in the identification of 324 proteins with 95% confidence. Approximately 50% of these proteins have predicted bipartite leader sequences at their amino termini. Nucleus-encoded proteins make up >90% of the proteins identified. With respect to biological function, plastid-localized light-harvesting proteins were well represented, as were proteins involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that many, but by no means all, of the proteins identified in our proteomic screen are of apparent green algal ancestry, consistent with the inferred evolutionary origin of the plastid and nucleomorph in chlorarachniophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Ford Doolittle
    INTERVIEW The Philosophical Approach: An Interview with Ford Doolittle Jane Gitschier* Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics and Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America * [email protected] For years, the whiteboard in my office brimmed with ideas for potential interviewees. Names were erased when an interview was completed, and new names added when a particular topic piqued my interest. Some were arranged in a kind of Venn diagram by their fields, and one such cluster—concerning the origins of early life forms—included three deep thinkers: Lynn Margulis, whose 1967 paper articulated the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria and chloro- plasts; Carl Woese, whose attempts to classify prokaryotes based on ribosomal RNA cataloging led to his championing the new kingdom of Archaea in 1977; and Ford Doolittle (Fig 1), who provided evidence for Margulis’s hypothesis using Woese’s methods. Though Woese and Mar- gulis are now deceased, Doolittle, I can attest, is very much alive and, dare I say, “kicking!” Over time, Doolittle has cogitated on a variety of intriguing evolutionary questions, including the origin of introns, the role of lateral gene transfer in speciation, and the meaning of “func- tion.” He is always worth listening to. Doolittle grew up in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, the son of an art professor and now hold- ing a BFA in photography himself. As a high-school friend of the late Sol Spiegelman’s son, he worked with Spiegelman in the summers. Following undergraduate studies at Harvard and graduate work with Charles Yanofsky at Stanford, he returned to Spiegelman’s lab for postdoc- toral work and then joined Norman Pace when Spiegelman moved to New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Dna Barcoding of Chlorarachniophytes Using Nucleomorph Its Sequences1
    J. Phycol. 46, 743–750 (2010) Ó 2010 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.00851.x DNA BARCODING OF CHLORARACHNIOPHYTES USING NUCLEOMORPH ITS SEQUENCES1 Gillian H. Gile,2 Rowena F. Stern,2 Erick R. James, and Patrick J. Keeling3 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4 Chlorarachniophytes are a small group of marine Chlorarachniophytes are a small group of marine photosynthetic protists. They are best known as photosynthetic protists belonging to the phylum examples of an intermediate stage of secondary Cercozoa in the supergroup Rhizaria (Bhattacharya endosymbiosis: their plastids are derived from green et al. 1995, Cavalier-Smith and Chao 1996, Keeling algae and retain a highly reduced nucleus, called a 2001, Nikolaev et al. 2004). They can take the form nucleomorph, between the inner and outer pairs of of amebae, coccoid cells, or flagellates, and many of membranes. Chlorarachniophytes can be challenging them alternate among all of these forms and varia- to identify to the species level, due to their small tions thereof during their complex life cycles size, complex life cycles, and the fact that even (Fig. 1). A major distinguishing feature of the chlor- genus-level diagnostic morphological characters are arachniophytes is their retention of a nucleomorph. observable only by EM. Few species have been for- Chlorarachniophytes acquired their plastid by the mally described, and many available culture collec- secondary endosymbiotic uptake of a green alga, tion strains remain unnamed. To alleviate this and the nucleomorph is a relict nucleus of that difficulty, we have developed a barcoding system endosymbiont that persists between the inner and for rapid and accurate identification of chlorarach- outer pairs of their four membrane-bound plastids niophyte species in culture, based on the internal (Ludwig and Gibbs 1989, Ishida et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Lovelock on Gaia
    18.12 concepts 769 AM 12/12/03 5:40 pm Page 769 concepts The living Earth Gaia evidence, these earlier ideas remained anec- James Lovelock dotal. In 1925 Alfred Lotka conjectured that Organisms and their environment magine a science-based civilization far it would be easier to model the evolution of evolve as a single, self-regulating distant in the Galaxy that had built an organisms and their material environment system. Iinterferometer of such resolving power coupled as a single entity than either of them that it could analyse the chemical composi- separately. Gaia had its origins in these earlier tion of our atmosphere. Simply from this thoughts, from the evidence gathered by the track temperature change, not regulate it. analysis, they could confidently conclude biogeochemists Alfred Redfield and Evelyn But the restraining function connecting that Earth, alone among the planets of the Hutchinson and from the mind-wrenching growth with temperature is not negotiable; Solar System, had a carbon-based life and top-down view provided by NASA. chemistry,not biology,sets its constants. an industrial civilization. They would have Although welcomed by atmospheric At this stage, the Gaia theory was missing seen methane and oxygen coexisting in the scientists, Earth scientists were cautious. plausible control mechanisms. The first dis- upper atmosphere, and their chemists Biologists, especially Ford Doolittle and covered was a biological process that redressed would have known that these gases are Richard Dawkins, argued strongly that global the imbalance of the nutritious elements continually consumed and replaced. The self-regulation could never have evolved, as sulphur and iodine — these are abundant in odds of this happening by chance inorganic the organism was the unit of selection,not the the oceans, but deficient on the land surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Génomique Des Virus Géants, Des Virophages, Et Échanges Génétiques Avec Leurs Hôtes Eucaryotes Lucie Gallot-Lavallée
    Génomique des virus géants, des virophages, et échanges génétiques avec leurs hôtes eucaryotes Lucie Gallot-Lavallée To cite this version: Lucie Gallot-Lavallée. Génomique des virus géants, des virophages, et échanges génétiques avec leurs hôtes eucaryotes. Sciences du Vivant [q-bio]. Aix-Marseille Université (AMU), 2017. Français. NNT : 2017AIXM0458. tel-01668916 HAL Id: tel-01668916 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01668916 Submitted on 20 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. AIX-MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ ÉCOLE DOCTORALE SCIENCES DE LA VIE ET DE LA SANTÉ (ED 62) LABORATOIRE INFORMATION GÉNOMIQUE ET STRUCTURALE Génomique des virus géants, des virophages, et échanges génétiques avec leurs hôtes eucaryotes Lucie Gallot-Lavallée Thèse présentée pour obtenir le grade universitaire de docteur en science de la vie et de la santé Discipline : Biologie Spécialité : Génomique et Bioinformatique Soutenue le 7 novembre 2017 devant le jury : Elisabeth Herniou Rapportrice Marie-Agnès Petit Rapportrice Gwenaël Piganeau Examinatrice Christophe Robaglia Examinateur Guillaume Blanc Co-directeur de thèse Jean-Michel Claverie Co-directeur de thèse 2 Remerciements Merci tout d’abord à mes deux directeurs de thèse Guillaume Blanc et Jean-Michel Claverie, sans qui cette thèse n’aurait pas pu exister.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence That Eukaryotic Triosephosphate Isomerase Is of Alpha-Proteobacterial Origin
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 1270–1275, February 1997 Evolution Evidence that eukaryotic triosephosphate isomerase is of alpha-proteobacterial origin PATRICK J. KEELING* AND W. FORD DOOLITTLE Department of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada, B3H 4H7 Communicated by Norman R. Pace, University of California, Berkeley, CA, December 10, 1996 (received for review July 8, 1996) ABSTRACT We have cloned and sequenced genes for nuclear genome. These genes most often resemble eubacterial triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) from the gamma-proteobac- homologues and are thought to have been transferred to the terium Francisella tularensis, the green non-sulfur bacterium nucleus from the symbiont genome, in most cases soon after Chloroflexus aurantiacus, and the alpha-proteobacterium Rhi- the endosymbiosis was established (11), although isolated zobium etli and used these in phylogenetic analysis with TPI instances of organelle to nucleus transfer occurring more sequences from other members of the Bacteria, Archaea, and recently in evolution can still be documented for both mito- Eukarya. These analyses show that eukaryotic TPI genes are chondria and plastids (12–15). most closely related to the homologue from the alpha- In nearly all widely accepted instances of such transfer, the proteobacterium and most distantly related to archaebacte- product of the transferred gene still functions in the organelle rial homologues. This relationship suggests that the TPI genes in which it originally resided. We are aware of only one clear present in modern eukaryotic genomes were derived from an case in which an organelle gene seems to have replaced a alpha-proteobacterial genome (possibly that of the protomi- nuclear homologue and assumed its cytosolic function.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleomorph and Plastid Genome Sequences of The
    Tanifuji et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:374 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/374 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Nucleomorph and plastid genome sequences of the chlorarachniophyte Lotharella oceanica: convergent reductive evolution and frequent recombination in nucleomorph-bearing algae Goro Tanifuji1,2†,NaokoTOnodera1†,MatthewWBrown3, Bruce A Curtis1,AndrewJRoger1, Gane Ka-Shu Wong4,5,6, Michael Melkonian7 and John M Archibald1* Abstract Background: Nucleomorphs are residual nuclei derived from eukaryotic endosymbionts in chlorarachniophyte and cryptophyte algae. The endosymbionts that gave rise to nucleomorphs and plastids in these two algal groups were green and red algae, respectively. Despite their independent origin, the chlorarachniophyte and cryptophyte nucleomorph genomes share similar genomic features such as extreme size reduction and a three-chromosome architecture. This suggests that similar reductive evolutionary forces have acted to shape the nucleomorph genomes in the two groups. Thus far, however, only a single chlorarachniophyte nucleomorph and plastid genome has been sequenced, making broad evolutionary inferences within the chlorarachniophytes and between chlorarachniophytes and cryptophytes difficult. We have sequenced the nucleomorph and plastid genomes of the chlorarachniophyte Lotharella oceanica in order to gain insight into nucleomorph and plastid genome diversity and evolution. Results: The L. oceanica nucleomorph genome was found to consist of three linear chromosomes totaling ~610 kilobase pairs (kbp), much larger than the 373 kbp nucleomorph genome of the model chlorarachniophyte Bigelowiella natans.TheL. oceanica plastid genome is 71 kbp in size, similar to that of B. natans. Unexpectedly long (~35 kbp) sub-telomeric repeat regions were identified in the L. oceanica nucleomorph genome; internal multi-copy regions were also detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic View on Origin of Foraminifera and Their Relationships with Other Amoeboid Protists
    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ ISSN 0101-9759 Vol. 29 - 1 / 2006 p. 184-185 FORAMS 2006 Genomic view on origin of foraminifera and their relationships with other amoeboid protists Fabien Burki & Jan Pawlowski Department of Zoology and Animal Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland [email protected] Until recently the molecular phylogeny of eukaryotes was mainly based on analyses of single or very few genes. The availability of genomic sequences from a broad range of eukaryotic phyla brought new perspectives and provided a more reliable view of the evolutionary relationships among eukaryotes. In particular, the phylogenomic analyses helped to resolve the eukaryote tree into a topology with a rather small number of major groups. Nevertheless, the evolutionary relationships of many groups of protists, including foraminifera, are yet to be confirmed. Based on rRNA sequences, foraminifera were at first thought to be an early diverging lineage among eukaryotes. This view has been challenged by analyses of actin, polyubiquitin and RNA polymerase sequences, which consistently demonstrated phylogenetic affinities of foraminifera to Cercozoa, a heterogeneous assemblage of filose testate amoebae, cercomonads, amoeboflagellates, chlorarachniophytes, gromiids, as well as certain protistan parasites Plasmodiophoriida (plants) and Haplosporidia (invertebrates). Among these groups, foraminifera appear to be most closely related to Gromiida, Plasmodiophoriida and Haplosporidia. Later studies showed that foraminifera and Cercozoa are sister group to radiolarians (Polycystinea & Acantharea) and a new supergroup Rhizaria comprising radiolaria, foraminifera, and Cercozoa was established. Although Rhizaria has been well accepted as being one of the major groups of eukaryotes, their representatives are missing in all the multigene phylogenies published yet.
    [Show full text]