Download Complete Issue
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												
												THE COMMITTEEMEN of NORFOLK and BEDFORDSHIRE by TOLL IAM STANLEY MARTIN B.A., University of Cambridge, 1970 a THESIS SUBMITTED I
THE COMMITTEEMEN OF NORFOLK AND BEDFORDSHIRE 1642-1660 by TOLL IAM STANLEY MARTIN B.A., University of Cambridge, 1970 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in ... The Department of HISTORY We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1976 (c) William Stanley Martin, 1976 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of History The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date 29 April 1976 - ii - ABSTRACT This study of Norfolk and Bedfordshire in the civil war and Interregnum was based on an analysis of the membership of the various committees appointed for the counties between December 1642 and March 1660. The members of the committees were divided into groups for analysis according to the dates of their first and last appointments. The gentry of Norfolk and Bedfordshire, which were both Parliamentarian counties, filled the committees of the 1640s, as they had the commissions of the peace in the 1630s. After the execution of the King in January'' 1649, the membership of the Bedfordshire committees was drastically changed by the loss of almost all the gentry members, while the Norfolk committees remained largely unchanged until I65I-I652. - 
												
												University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i ii UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF LAW, ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES Doctor of Philosophy MILITARY INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS IN THE FIRST ENGLISH CIVIL WAR 1642 – 1646 By John Edward Kirkham Ellis This thesis sets out to correct the current widely held perception that military intelligence operations played a minor part in determining the outcome of the English Civil War. In spite of the warnings of Sir Charles Firth and, more recently, Ronald Hutton, many historical assessments of the role played by intelligence-gathering continue to rely upon the pronouncements made by the great Royalist historian Sir Edward Hyde, earl of Clarendon, in his History of the Rebellion. Yet the overwhelming evidence of the contemporary sources shows clearly that intelligence information did, in fact, play a major part in deciding the outcome of the key battles that determined the outcome of the Civil War itself. - 
												
												Religious Unorthodoxy and Radical Politics: the Political Theory of Gerrard Winstanley
INFORMATION TO USERS This was pr oduced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. - 
												
												The English Civil War 7 Overview of the Topic 7 History 7 Current Situation 12 Possible Solutions 15 Character Profiles 16 Questions to Consider 23 Endnotes 24
HoMMUNC 30 ECW English Civil War: 1642-165 MIRANDA BANNISTER ALEX KARPF CHAIR MODERATOR HoMMUNC TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Secretaries-General 3 Letter from the Chair 4 Committee Background 5 Topic A: The English Civil War 7 Overview of the Topic 7 History 7 Current Situation 12 Possible Solutions 15 Character Profiles 16 Questions to Consider 23 Endnotes 24 Horace Mann Model United Nations Conference !2 HoMMUNC 30 LETTERHoMMUNC FROM THE SECRETARIES-GENERAL Erica Cantor Alexander O’Neill DEAR DELEGATES, Daniel Rosenblatt Secretaries-General Welcome to Horace Mann’s 30th annual Model United Nations conference, HoMMUNC 30! Since 1985, HoMMUNC has Miranda Bannister engaged the future leaders of the world in a day full of Chair of the Board learning, debate, and compromise. The conference brings Anne Rosenblatt together intellectually curious high school students to Vice-Chair of the Board contemplate and discuss serious global concerns. We are honored to have inherited the responsibility of preparing this Daria Balaeskoul event for the over 1000 students that will participate in Stephanie Fernandez Edith Herwitz HoMMUNC 30. Anne Kuritzkes Russell Mindich Regardless of your age or experience in Model UN, we Adam Shaw challenge you to remain engaged in the discourse of your Senior Board committees and truly involve yourself in the negotiation Daniel Frackman process. Each committee is comprised of an eclectic group of Maya Klaris delegates and will address an important global concern. Take Anaya Kumar-Banerjee this opportunity to delve deep into that problem: educate Noah Shapiro yourself, think innovatively to create the best solutions, and Under-Secretaries- General lead the committee to a resolution that could better the world. - 
												
												Sir Samuel Luke
Oxfordshire Record Society JOURNAL OF SIR SAMUEL LUKE Scoutmaster to the Earl Of Essex 1642 – 1644 Transcribed and Edited with an Introduction by I. G. Philip M.A. Secretary of the Bodleian Library Oxford JOURNAL OF SIR SAMUEL LUKE ii JOURNAL OF SIR SAMUEL LUKE This paper was originally published in 3 parts by the Oxfordshire Record Society between 1950 and 1953 Sir Samuel Luke, eldest son of Sir Oliver Luke, of Woodend, Bedfordshire, is probably best known as the supposed original of Butler's Hudibras, and is referred to in the key to Hudibras attributed to Roger L'Estrange as "a self-conceited commander under Oliver Cromwell" But Luke, whose reputation has suffered from this attribution, was neither a foolish nor an ineffectual figure.1 He represented Bedford borough in the Short Parliament of 1640 and in the Long Parliament, and then when Civil War broke out, as a member of the Presbyterian party, he joined the Parliamentary forces. From 30th July 1642 he was captain of a troop of horse and fought with his troop at Edgehill. Then on 4th January 1643 he was commissioned by the Earl of Essex to raise a troop of dragoons in Bedfordshire. With this troop Luke accompanied Essex from Windsor to Reading, was present at the siege of Reading, 15th-25th April,2 and then moved to the region of Thame where Essex established his headquarters in June. Here, at Chinnor, on 18th June Luke's troop was routed by Prince Rupert, but Luke himself, who was absent from the Chinnor fight, fought with Hampden at Chalgrove field on the same day, and distinguished himself by his courage. - 
												
												1 Buckinghamshire
Buckinghamshire; A Military History by Ian F. W. Beckett 1 Chapter Two: 1603-1660 By the end of Elizabeth’s reign there were already signs of the growing distaste for the demands being made on counties through the agency of the lieutenancy. Local gentry were not oblivious to the requirements of national defence and of law and order, but the preservation of local harmony remained a priority. Given the nature of government, much reliance had to be placed on the co-operation of all levels of local administration, not least deputy lieutenants. Indeed, it has been suggested that the mid-seventeenth century was to see the peak of the transfer of local power from the dominant noble households of the past to county institutions, in which lieutenancy, shrievalty, justices and even parochial officials played their part in privileging ‘county mindedness’. 1 Many of the county’s gentry families were already well established. The Bulstrode (Hedgerley), Cheyne (Chesham Bois), Dayrell (Lillingstone Dayrell), Grenville (Wotton Underwood), Hampden (Great Hampden), Ingoldsby (Lenborough), Lee (Quarrendon), Longville (Wolverton and Bradwell), Pigott (Doddershall), Throckmorton (Weston Underwood), Tyrell (Castlethorpe), Tyringham (Tyringham), and Verney (Middle Claydon) families had all been connected to Bucks before 1500. The Andrewes (Lathbury), Borlase (Medmenham and Marlow), Chester (Chicheley), Croke (Chilton), Denton (Hillesden), Digby (Gayhurst), Duncombe (Great Brickhill), Fleetwood (Great Missenden), Fortescue (Salden), Goodwin (Upper Winchendon), and Temple (Stowe) families had been sixteenth century arrivals. Only the Dormer (Ascott, Wing), Drake (Amersham), West (Marsworth), Whitelocke (Fawley) and Winwood (Ditton) families were comparatively new to the county. 1 John Morrill, The Nature of the English Revolution (Harlow: Longman, 1993), 186. - 
												
												Durham E-Theses
Durham E-Theses 1659 - 1660: A study in the inter-action of political and religious forces in the period between the fall of Richard Cromwell and the restoration of Charles II Nightingale, J. Leslie How to cite: Nightingale, J. Leslie (1936) 1659 - 1660: A study in the inter-action of political and religious forces in the period between the fall of Richard Cromwell and the restoration of Charles II, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10369/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 1659 •- 1660. A study in the inter-action of political and religious forces in the period between the fall of Richard Cromwell and the Restoration of Charles II. They who when Saul was dead,without a blow Made foolish Ish-bosheth the crown forego; Who "banished David did from Hebron bring, And with a general shout proclaimed him King.