Fortescue River Gas Pipeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fortescue River Gas Pipeline FORTESCUE RIVER GAS PIPELINE ENVIRONMENT PLAN Revision 4.2 PUBLIC SUMMARY DOCUMENT FGP-5501-0504-01 (E-PLN-012) April 2020 Fortescue River Gas Pipeline Environment Plan – Public Summary Document DOCUMENT CONTROL Rev Date Description 0 April 2020 Initial Submission Title Name Author HSE Advisor Kirsten Merritt Reviewed Approved Senior HSE Advisor Mark Brown ii Fortescue River Gas Pipeline Environment Plan – Public Summary Document Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Proponent .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Location ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Project Approvals ................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Existing Environment ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Biogeographic and regional setting ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Climate ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Geology .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4. Hydrology .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4.1. Surface water .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4.2. Groundwater ............................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.3. Millstream Water Reserve.......................................................................................................................... 5 2.5. Flora and Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5.1. Flora ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.5.2. Threatened and priority flora .................................................................................................................... 6 2.5.3. Vegetation ................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.5.4. Vegetation condition .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.5.5. Priority and Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................................... 7 2.5.6. Introduced species ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2.6. Conservation Areas .............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.7. Fauna ................................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.7.1. Fauna habitats .......................................................................................................................................... 11 2.7.2. Conservation fauna species ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.8. Community .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.9. Cultural ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3. Activity Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Facilities ............................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2. Communications System ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.3. SCADA .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4. Access .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.5. Transportation Services Control Centre .......................................................................................................... 16 3.6. Enhancements and Modifications (Projects)................................................................................................... 16 3.7. Decommissioning and Rehabilitation ............................................................................................................... 16 3.8. Vegetation Maintenance .................................................................................................................................... 16 iii Fortescue River Gas Pipeline Environment Plan – Public Summary Document 4. Implementation Strategy ............................................................................................................................................ 17 4.1. Soils and Sediment............................................................................................................................................. 17 4.2. Flora ..................................................................................................................................................................... 18 4.3. Weeds .................................................................................................................................................................. 19 4.4. Bushfire ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.5. Fauna ................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.6. Cultural Heritage and Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................ 21 4.7. Air Emissions including Dust and Noise .......................................................................................................... 21 4.8. Surface and Groundwater ................................................................................................................................. 22 4.9. Hazardous Materials Storage and Handling .................................................................................................... 23 4.10. Waste Management ........................................................................................................................................... 24 5. Environmental Management System ......................................................................................................................... 25 5.1. Induction and Training ...................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2. Incident Management ........................................................................................................................................ 25 5.3. Emergency Preparedness and Response ........................................................................................................ 25 5.4. Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................................... 26 5.5. Inspections and Audits ...................................................................................................................................... 26 5.5.1. EP Review and Compliance Audit ........................................................................................................... 26 5.6. Review and Improvement ................................................................................................................................. 26 5.7. Reporting ............................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Introduction of an Alien Fish Species in the Pilbara Region of Western
    RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 33 108–114 (2018) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.33(1).2018.108-114 Introduction of an alien fsh species in the Pilbara region of Western Australia Dean C. Thorburn1, James J. Keleher1 and Simon G. Longbottom1 1 Indo-Pacifc Environmental, PO Box 191, Duncraig East, Western Australia 6023, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – Until recently rivers of the Pilbara region of north Western Australia were considered to be free of introduced fsh species. However, a survey of aquatic fauna of the Fortescue River conducted in March 2017 resulted in the capture of 19 Poecilia latipinna (Sailfn Molly) throughout a 25 km section of the upper catchment. This represented the frst record of an alien fsh species in the Pilbara region and the most northern record in Western Australia. Based on the size of the individuals captured, the distribution over which they were recorded and the fact that the largest female was mature, P. latipinna appeared to be breeding. While P. latipinna was unlikely to physically threaten native fsh species in the upper reaches of the Fortescue River, potential spatial and dietary competition may exist if it reaches downstream waters where native fsh diversity is higher and dietary overlap is likely. As P. latipinna has the potential to affect macroinvertebrate communities, some risk may also exist to the macroinvertebrate community of the Fortescue Marsh, which is located immediately downstream, and which is valued for its numerous short range endemic aquatic invertebrates. The current fnding indicated that despite the relative isolation of the river and presence of a low human population, this remoteness does not mean the river is safe from the potential impact of species introductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Decisions at at 12 October 2018
    MINISTERIAL DECISIONS AS AT OCTOBER 2020 Recently received Awaiting decision pursuant to section 45(7) of Pending submission to Pending decision by Ministerial decision the Environmental Protection Act 1986 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Minister for Aboriginal Affairs APPLICANT / MINISTERIAL LAND PURPOSE LANDOWNER DECISION September 2020 Lot 140 on DP 39512, CT 2227/905, 140 South Western Highway, Land Act No. 11238201, Lot 141 on DP 39512, CT 2227/906, 141 South Western Highway, Land Act No. 11238202, 202 Vittoria Road, Land Act No. 11891696, Glen Iris. Pending Intersection Vittoria Road Lot 201 on DP 57769, CT 2686/979, 201 submission to Main Roads South Western Highway South Western Highway, Land Act No. Minister for Western Australia upgrade and Bridge 0430 11733330, Lot 202 on DP 56668, CT Aboriginal Affairs replacement, Picton. 2754/978, Picton. Road Reserve, Land Act No.s 1575861, 11397280, 11397277, 1347375, and 1292274. Unallocated Crown Land, South Western Highway, Land Act No.s 11580413, 1319074 and 1292275, Picton. Pending Fortifying Mining Pty Ltd – Tenements M25/369, P25/2618, submission to Fortify Mining Pty Majestic North Project. To P25/2619, P25/2620, and P25/2621, Minister for Ltd undertake exploration and Goldfields. Aboriginal Affairs resource delineation drilling Reserve 34565, Lot 11835 on Plan Pending 240379, CT 3141/191, Coode Street, Landscape enhancement submission to City of South South Perth, Land Act No. 1081341 and and river restoration. To Minister for Perth Reserve 48325, Lot 301 on Plan 47451, construct the Waterbird Aboriginal Affairs CT 3151/548, 171 Riverside Drive, Land Refuge Act No. 11714773, Perth Pending Able Planning and Lot 501 on Plan 23800, CT 2219/673, submission to Lot 501 Yalyalup Urban Project 113 Vasse Highway, Yalyalup, Land Act Minister for Subdivision.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia
    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia By: D.A. Cumming, D. Garratt, M. McCarthy, A. WoICe With <.:unlribuliuns from Albany Seniur High Schoul. M. Anderson. R. Howard. C.A. Miller and P. Worsley Octobel' 1995 @WAUUSEUM Report: Department of Matitime Archaeology, Westem Australian Maritime Museum. No, 98. Cover pholograph: A view of Halllelin Bay in iL~ heyday as a limber porl. (W A Marilime Museum) This study is dedicated to the memory of Denis Arthur Cuml11ing 1923-1995 This project was funded under the National Estate Program, a Commonwealth-financed grants scheme administered by the Australian HeriL:'lge Commission (Federal Government) and the Heritage Council of Western Australia. (State Govenlluent). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Heritage Council of Western Australia Mr lan Baxter (Director) Mr Geny MacGill Ms Jenni Williams Ms Sharon McKerrow Dr Lenore Layman The Institution of Engineers, Australia Mr Max Anderson Mr Richard Hartley Mr Bmce James Mr Tony Moulds Mrs Dorothy Austen-Smith The State Archive of Westem Australia Mr David Whitford The Esperance Bay HistOIical Society Mrs Olive Tamlin Mr Merv Andre Mr Peter Anderson of Esperance Mr Peter Hudson of Esperance The Augusta HistOIical Society Mr Steve Mm'shall of Augusta The Busselton HistOlical Societv Mrs Elizabeth Nelson Mr Alfred Reynolds of Dunsborough Mr Philip Overton of Busselton Mr Rupert Genitsen The Bunbury Timber Jetty Preservation Society inc. Mrs B. Manea The Bunbury HistOlical Society The Rockingham Historical Society The Geraldton Historical Society Mrs J Trautman Mrs D Benzie Mrs Glenis Thomas Mr Peter W orsley of Gerald ton The Onslow Goods Shed Museum Mr lan Blair Mr Les Butcher Ms Gaye Nay ton The Roebourne Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Managed Aquifer Recharge in Developing Northern Australian Agriculture CASE STUDIES to DETERMINE the ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
    Managed Aquifer Recharge ISSN 2206-1991 Volume 2 No 3 2017 https://doi.org/10.21139/wej.2017.029 THE ROLE OF MANAGED AQUIFER RECHARGE IN DEVELOPING NORTHERN AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE CASE STUDIES TO DETERMINE THE ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY R Evans, L Lennon, G Hoxley, R Krake, D Yin Foo, C Schelfhout, J Simons ABSTRACT more economically attractive for horticulture production. Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a commonly used technique in many countries to artificially increase the INTRODUCTION This paper describes a study to consider the role recharge rate over the wet season and hence increase of MAR in developing irrigated agriculture in the the groundwater storage available during the dry season. Northern Territory (Daly catchment and Central Considering northern Australia’s long dry season and Australia) and the Pilbara in Western Australia. The relatively short wet season, MAR has the potential to play fundamental advantages of MAR based developments a major role in water resource development. over conventional water sources (typically large dams) Shallow weirs, infiltration trenches and injection bores are the cost of transporting water, lack of evaporative were considered as the main MAR methods. Five losses, seasonal variability and the scalability of sites were assessed in the Pilbara and seven across MAR projects. Conversely, impediments are believed the Northern Territory. After consideration of a range to be primarily the economic feasibility rather than of factors such as the available source water, local the technical feasibility. When compared to other hydrogeology, soil suitability and potential irrigation water supply options, MAR can be attractive both demand, most sites were considered technically feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuwarra Red Dog Highway S38 Referral Supporting Information
    Manuwarra Red Dog Highway s38 Referral Supporting Information Revision | 1 26 November 2020 Main Roads Western Australia s38 R efe rral Sup po rti ng In fo rmatio n Main Roa ds Weste rn A us trali a s38 Referral Supporting Information Manuwarra Red Dog Highway Project No: IW217863 Document Title: s38 Referral Supporting Information Revision: 1 Document Status: Final Date: 26 November 2020 Client Name: Main Roads Western Australia Project Manager: Lisa Boulden Author: Lisa Boulden & Claire Beckett File Name: MRDH-4_EPA_ReferralSupportingInformationDocument_Rev1_Tracked_2020-11- 25.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 8th Floor, Durack Centre 263 Adelaide Terrace PO Box H615 Perth WA 6001 Australia T +61 8 9469 4400 F +61 8 9469 4488 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved A 07/07/20 Draft for Client Review CB LB PS ADV B 11/08/20 Draft for Client Review LB ADV PS ADV C 16/09/20 Final Draft for Client Review LB ADV PS ADV 0 06/10/20 Final for Issue LB ADV PS ADV 1 26/11/20 Revised following EPA Comments HN LB PS ADV i s38 Referral Supporting Information Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Satellite Sees Blake's Remnants Bringing Desert Rain to Western Australia 10 January 2020, by Rob Gutro
    NASA satellite sees Blake's remnants bringing desert rain to Western Australia 10 January 2020, by Rob Gutro southeastern corner of the region. The Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology (ABM) in Western Australia issued several flood warnings at 10:47 a.m. WST on Friday Jan. 10. Flood Warnings were in effect for four areas. There is a Major Flood Warning for the De Grey River Catchment and a Flood Warning for the Fortescue River, Salt Lakes District Rivers, and southwestern parts the Sandy Desert Catchment. ABM said, "Major flooding is occurring in the Nullagine River in the De Grey river catchment. Most upstream locations have now peaked with minor to moderate flooding expected to continue during Friday before flooding starts to ease On Jan. 10, 2020, the MODIS instrument that flies throughout the area over the weekend. Heavy aboard NASA’s Aqua satellite provided a visible image rainfall from ex-Tropical Cyclone Blake has resulted of Ex-tropical storm Blake covering part of Western in in rapid river level rises, and areas of flooding Australia and still generating enough precipitation to call throughout the De Grey river catchment. Flooding for warnings. Credit: NASA Worldview has adversely impacted road conditions particularly at floodways resulting in multiple road closures." Rainfall totals over 24 hours in the De Grey NASA's Aqua satellite provided a look at the catchment indicated 1.30 inches (33 mm) at remnant clouds and storms associated with Ex- Nullagine. tropical Cyclone Blake as it continues to move through Western Australia and generate rainfall On Jan. 10, areas of flooding were occurring in the over desert areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Watch Areas
    ! Daly Sir Graham Pine Moore River Flood Watch Area No. Flood Watch Area No. ! Creek Island ! Ashburton River 12 Middle Onslow Coast 9 Osborne Flood Watch Areas Bigge Island Avon River 24 Pilbara Coastal Rivers 7 ! Kalumburu Island Ka!therine ! Western Australia Blackwood River 30 Preston River 29 Bamyili ! Busselton Coastal Rivers 31 Coronation Adolphus Salt Lakes District Rivers 20 Island Island Collie River 28 Augustus 1 Sandy Desert 10 Island De Grey River 8 ! Wyndham South Coastal Rivers 32 East Kimberley Rivers 2 ! South West District Rivers 33 Koolan Kununurra Fitzroy River 4 Island Sturt Creek District 5 Fortescue River 11 2 NT Swan River 25 Dunmarra Gascoyne River 15 3 ! ! Tanami Desert 6 Mount Greenough River 19 Barnett ! Warburton District Rivers 18 Warmun ! (Turkey Kalkarindji Harvey River 27 Derby ! Elliott West Kimberley Rivers 3 3 Creek) ! Lyndon-Minilya Rivers 13 Broome Western Desert 14 ! Looma Halls Moore and Hill Rivers 22 ! Fitzroy Renner 4 Creek Wooramel River 16 Bidyadanga Crossing ! ! Lajamanu Springs Murchison River 17 ! ! I n d i a n Community Murray River 26 Yarra Yarra Lakes District 21 (Lagrange) ! Larrawa ! O c e a n North Kimberley Rivers 1 Nullarbor District Rivers 23 ! Warrego 5 ! ! Sandfire Balgo Tennant Port Hill Creek ! Pardoo ! Hedland ! Barrow Island ! Karratha 6 Dampier ! ! ! Whim Creek Marble Roebourne Bar ! 7 Telfer ! Onslow 8 ! ! Pannawonica Exmouth ! 10 9 Munjina ! Gorge Cotton Yuendumu Nanutarra ! ! Creek ! ! Tom Coral ! ! Price 11 ! Lyndon Papunya Bay ! ! ! Newman ! Paraburdoo Alice 12 Springs
    [Show full text]
  • The Riparian Flora and Plant Communities of the Pilbara Region Of
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.78(2).2015.485-513 Records of the Western Australian Museum, Supplement 78: 485–513 (2015). The riparian fl ora and plant communities of the Pilbara region of Western Australia M.N. Lyons Department of Parks and Wildlife, Science and Conservation Division, Kieran McNamara Conservation Science Centre, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract – A survey of riparian fl ora and plant communities was undertaken at 98 wetlands and rivers in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Sampling was quadrat-based, with fl oristics, surface soils and wetland attributes recorded. Selected sites captured the full range of Pilbara wetland types including springs, river pools, claypans, salt marshes and rock pools. A total of 455 taxa was recorded from the survey sites, representing ca. 25% of the known fl ora of the Pilbara bioregion. The fl ora is dominated by taxa with Eremaean and tropical affi nities, with only six taxa endemic in the region. Of recorded taxa known from four or fewer bioregions, most are shared with the adjacent Carnarvon and Gascoyne bioregions rather than the adjoining internally draining deserts. Sixteen taxa of conservation signifi cance were documented, with claypans, the Fortescue Marsh, and Millstream and Karijini National Park sites dominating occurrences of rare species. Eight major groups were defi ned by classifying wetlands in terms of species presence/absence data. Floristic patterning was strongly aligned with the major wetland types (geomorphic/hydrological) used in the primary sampling stratifi cation. A combination of wetland morphology/hydrological setting, site edaphic attributes and distance to the coast were dominant variables related to riparian fl oristic composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Resource Assessment and Conceptualization in the Pilbara Region, Western Australia
    Earth Systems and Environment https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0051-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Groundwater Resource Assessment and Conceptualization in the Pilbara Region, Western Australia Rodrigo Rojas1 · Philip Commander2 · Don McFarlane3,4 · Riasat Ali5 · Warrick Dawes3 · Olga Barron3 · Geof Hodgson3 · Steve Charles3 Received: 25 January 2018 / Accepted: 8 May 2018 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract The Pilbara region is one of the most important mining hubs in Australia. It is also a region characterised by an extreme climate, featuring environmental assets of national signifcance, and considered a valued land by indigenous people. Given the arid conditions, surface water is scarce, shows large variability, and is an unreliable source of water for drinking and industrial/mining purposes. In such conditions, groundwater has become a strategic resource in the Pilbara region. To date, however, an integrated regional characterization and conceptualization of the occurrence of groundwater resources in this region were missing. This article addresses this gap by integrating disperse knowledge, collating available data on aquifer properties, by reviewing groundwater systems (aquifer types) present in the region and identifying their potential, and propos- ing conceptualizations for the occurrence and functioning of the groundwater systems identifed. Results show that aquifers across the Pilbara Region vary substantially and can be classifed in seven main types: coastal alluvial systems, concealed channel
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Management Plan
    Recreational Use Management Plan Iron Ore Mine and Downstream Processing, Cape Preston, Western Australia Mineralogy Pty Ltd October 2006 Recreational Use Management Plan Prepared for Mineralogy Pty Ltd Prepared by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, 629 Newcastle Street, PO Box 81, Leederville 6902, Western Australia T +61 8 9281 6100 F +61 8 9281 6295 www.maunsell.com ABN 20 093 846 925 October 2006 74300904.06 © Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd 2006 The information contained in this document produced by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client identified on the cover sheet for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. Recreational Use Management Plan G:\74300904.06\doc\rep\2006_10_Recreational Use MP_Maunsell.doc Revision I October 2006 Quality Information Document Recreational Use Management Plan Ref 74300904.06 Date October 2006 Prepared by Jamie Shaw Reviewed by Stephen Clark Revision History Authorised Revision Revision Details Date Name/Position Signature Stephen Clark Senior Principle I 24/10/06 Final Environmental Engineer Recreational Use Management Plan G:\74300904.06\doc\rep\2006_10_Recreational Use MP_Maunsell.doc Revision I October 2006 Table of Contents 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • Robe River Robe Is the Fourth Largest Seaborne Trader in Iron Ore Western Australia Processing Between 27 and 32 Million Tonnes Per Year
    ROBE RIVER ROBE IS THE FOURTH LARGEST SEABORNE TRADER IN IRON ORE WESTERN AUSTRALIA PROCESSING BETWEEN 27 AND 32 MILLION TONNES PER YEAR. Robe River Iron Associates is a dynamic Australian joint venture In 1996 Robe purchased an MMD 1500 Series Twin Shaft Sizer fit- which is widely regarded as the worlds most cost effective, consis- ted with 4 Tooth heavy duty rotors. The sizer is powered by two 500 tent and reliable supplier of Iron Ore. It's major deposits, current- hp electric motors, each driving though a fluid coupling and MMD ly estimated at 3 to 4 billion tonnes, are found in Mesas stretching Heavy Duty Gearbox. This machine was designed to achieve the for 100 kilometres along specification demanded by Robe, which was to reduce the ROM ore the ancient Robe River from sizes up to 2.0 x 2.0 x 1.5 metres down to a nominal -300 mm, Valley in Western at an initial 6,000 tph but with a guaranteed output of 10,000 tph to Australia's Pilbara facilitate future expansion plans. The haul trucks which operate 24 Region. The mine is hours per day, 7 days a week, all year round, dump into the sizer sta- located 1,400 kilome- tion's 1200 tonne capacity hopper, then the apron feeder discharges tres north by road from Tipping ore into a 1200 tonne directly into the the state capital, Perth. dump hopper. MMD Sizer at a A 200 kilometre railroad controlled rate. A conveyor, running at 4 m/s, then transports connects the mine to the the nominal -300 mm product to the train loadout hoppers.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia-Wide Assessment of River Health: Western Australian Bioassessment Report
    National River Health Program healthy rivers living rivers rivers for life MONITORING RIVER HEALTH INITIATIVE TECHNICAL REPORT REPORT NUMBER 7 Australia-Wide Assessment of River Health: Western Australian Bioassessment Report Authors: S. A. Halse M. D. Scanlon J. S. Cocking Published By: Environment Australia GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 Authors: S.A Halse, M.D. Scanlon and J.S. Cocking Department of Conservation and Land Management PO Box 51 Wanneroo WA 6946 Copyright: Department of Conservation and Land Management and Commonwealth of Australia This work is copyright. Information contained in this publication may be copied or reproduced for study, research, information, or educational purposes, subject to inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the above authors and: Assistant Secretary Water Branch Environment Australia GPO Box 787 Canberra ACT 2601 Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Commonwealth Government or the Minister for the Environment and Heritage. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication. The information contained in this work has been published by Environment Australia to help develop community, industry and management expertise in sustainable water resources management and raise awareness of river health issues and the needs of our rivers.
    [Show full text]