DOCSLIB.ORG

Download The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download The SPECIAL ANALYSIS FOREIGN POLICY COMMITMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES College Debate Series AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH 1200-17THSTREET, N.W. -WASH/NGTON, D. C. 20036 THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH, established in 1943, is a nonpartisan research and educational organization which studies national policy problems. Institute publications take two major forms: l. LEGISLATIVE AND SPECIAL ANALYSES - factual analyses of current legislative proposals and other public policy issues before the Congress prepared with the help of recognized experts in the academic world and in the fields of law and government. A typical analysis features: (1) pertinent background, (2) a digest of significant elements, and (3) a discussion, pro and con, of the issues. The reports reflect no policy position in favor of or against specific proposals. 2. LONG-RANGE STUDIES - basic studies of major national problems of significance for public policy. The Institute, with the counsel of its Advisory Board, utilizes the services of competent scholars, but the opinions expressed are those of the authors and represent no policy position on the part of the Institute. ADVISORY BOARD Paul W. McCracken, Chairman Edmund Ezra Day University Professor of Business Administration University of Michigan Karl Brandt Loy W. Henderson Professor of Economic Policy Director, Center for Diplomacy Emeritus and Foreign Policy Stanford University American University Felix Morley Milton Friedman Editor and Author Paul S. Russell Distinguished Service Professor of Economics Stanley Parry University of Chicago Professor, Department of Political Science University of Southern Mississippi Gottfried Haberler Galen L. Stone Professor E. Blythe Stason of International Trade Dean Emeritus, Law School Harvard University University of Michigan George E. Taylor Director, Far Eastern & Russian Institute University of Washington OFFICERS Chairman Carl N. Jo cobs Vice Chairmen Henry T. Bodman Clyde T. Foster H. C. Lumb President Treasurer William J, Baroody Henry T. Bodman Thomas F. Johnson Joseph G. Butts Director of Research Director of Legislative Analysis Howard Friend Earl H. Vass Director of Public Finance Analysis Director of International Studies FOREIGN POLICY COMMITMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES College Debate Series October 14, 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE----------------------------------------------------------- ix CHAPTER I. POST-WORLD WAR II UNITED STATES FOREIGN POLICY COMMI'IMENTS-------------------------------------------- Introductory Essay------------------------------------ 1 I. The Legacy of World War II--The United Nations------ 1 II. From San Francisco to Containment------------------- 4 A. The Failure of Cooperation--------------------- 4 B. The Truman Doctrine---------------------------- 5 III. Economic Commitments-------------------------------- 6 A. International Economic Organizations----------- 6 B. The Marshall Plan------------------------------ 8 C. Aid for Economic Development------------------- 10 1. Technical Assistance---------------------- 10 2. East-West Rivalry------------------------- 11 3. Developmental Financing------------------- 12 (a) Public Law 480---------------------- 12 (b) Development Loan Fund--------------- 12 (c) Multilateral Approach--------------- 13 D. The Kennedy-Johnson Programs------------------- 14 IV. United States Military Policy----------------------- 16 A. Latin America------------'---------------------- 16 1. The Monroe Doctrine----------------------- 16 2. The Act of Chapultepec---·----------------- 17 3. The Rio Treaty---------------------------- 18 4. Organization of American States----------- 19 5. Rifts Between Good Neighbors-------------- 19 6. Security in the 1960's-------------------- 20 B. United States Military Policy in Europe-------- 21 1. The North Atlantic Treaty----------------- 21 2. The Mutual Security Act------------------- 22 3. German Rearmament------------------------- 23 4. NATO in the 1960's------------------------ 23 - i - 1 1 CHAPTER C. United States Military Policy in the Middle East----------------------------------------- 25 1. The Cold War------------------------------ 25 2. The Baghdad Pact-------------------------- 26 3. The Eisenhower Doctrine------------------- 27 4. Continuing Middle East Crisis------------- 28 D. United States Military Policy in the Far East-- 29 1. The Legacy of World War 11---------------- 29 (a) China------------------------------- 29 (b) Japan------------------------------- 29 (c) Korea------------------------------- 30 2. The Korean War---------------------------- 30 3. The War in Indo-China--------------------- 32 4. Geneva Conference------------------------- 32 5. Southeast Asia Treaty Organization-------- 33 6. The Southeast Asian Dilemma--------------- 34 V. Epilogue-------------------------------------------- 36 Bibliography------------------------------------- 37 II. ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSITION------------------------------ 39 Introductory Essay------------------------------------ 39 I. Definition of Terms--------------------------------- 39 A. "Foreign Policy Commitments"------------------- 40 B. "Substantially Reduce"------------------------- 43 1. Total Abolition of All Commitments-------- 43 2. Renunciation of Certain General Policies-- 43 3. Structural Change in or Abolition of Com­ mitments Without Changing Underlying Policies-------------------------------- 44 4. Reduction of the Amount or Extent of Sup- port Without Alteration of the Structural Commitment------------------- 44 5. Gradual Reduction of the American Commitment------------------------------ 44 6. Transfer of the Commitment From One Channel to Another---------------------- 44 7. Reducing the Duration of the Commitment--- 45 II. The Goals and Determinants of American Foreign Policy-------------------------------------------- 45 A. Determinants of the Existence, Strength, and Duration of American Foreign Policy Commitments---------------------------------- 46 1. Geographical Position of the United States 46 2. Wealth, Natural Resources, and Industrial Growth---------------------------------- 46 - ii - CHAPTER 3. The American Government and Political System--------------------------- ------ 47 4. Presence of Large Numbers of Ethnic Groups in the American Population-------------- 47 5. American Devotion to the Democratic Form of Government--------------------------- 47 6. Close Relationship Between Diplomatic and Military Affairs------------------------ 48 7. Desire for Reciprocal Commitments--------- 48 8. The Emergence of the United States to World Leadership After World War II----- 48 9. American Leadership in the Formation of the United Nations---------------------- 49 10. American Development of Atomic and Nuclear Weapons--------------------------------- 49 B. Current Goals of American Foreign Policy------- 49 III. The Machinery of American Foreign Policy: How Com­ mitments are Undertaken--------------------------- 51 A. The President and Foreign Policy Commitments--- 51 B. The State Department and Foreign Policy Commitments---------------------------------- 54 C. Congress and Foreign Policy Commitments-------- 54 1. Senate Approval of Treaties--------------- 55 2. Legislation of Joint Resolution----------- 55 3. Declaration of War------------------------ 55 4. Appropriations---------------------------- 55 5. Investigations---------------------------- 56 D. Other Branches of the Government and Foreign Policy Commitments--------------------------- 56 1. United Nations Mission-------------------- 56 2. United States Information Agency---------- 56 3. National Security Council----------------- 56 4. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency------- 57 S. Peace Corps------------------------------- 57 6. Central Intelligence Agency--------------- 57 IV. Affirmative Strategy: General Considerations and Questions----------------------------------------- 5 8 A. By What Standards Should American Foreign Policy Be Judged?---------------------------- 58 B. What Aspects of American Foreign Policy Warrant Criticism?----------------------------------- 58 C. Is the Policy or the Commitment the Source of the Failure?--------------------------------- 59 D. If the Commitment is at Fault, in What Respect? 59 E. How Would A Change in the Particular Commitment Affect the Whole System of American Foreign Policy?-------------------------------------- 60 - iii - CHAPTER F. What Additional Benefits May Follow From the Proposed Reduction?-------------------------- 61 G. Are the Proposed Reductions Within the Spirit of the Resolution?--------------------------- 61 V. Negative Strategy: General Considerations and Questions----------------------------------------- 61 A. Substantial Reduction of Certain Commitments Might Affect the Value and Credibility of American Commitments Generally--------------- 62 B. Substantial Reduction Might Cause Retaliation by Other Nations----------------------------- 62 C. Substantial Reduction Might Upset the Delicate Balance of International Relations or Intro- duce Serious Inconsistencies----------------- 62 D. Substantial Reduction Might Create A Vacuum Into Which Communist Power Could Move-------- 62 E. Substantial Reduction Might Have Adverse Ef- fects on the American Economy---------------- 63 F. Defense of American Foreign Policy Commitments in the Three Major Areas of Controversy------ 63 G. Defense of Minor American Foreign Policy Commitments---------------------------------- 63 Discussion Questions-----------·------------------ 65 Bibliography-------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download (7MB)
    A múlt, a jelen és a jövő fegyverei HHADITECHNIKAADITECHNIKA 2017/3 LI. évfolyam 3. szám Ára 520 Ft A német-holland Boxer harcjármű Éves előfizetési díj 3120 Ft 9 770230 6891081 7 0 0 3 Tartalom A HONVÉDELMI MINISZTÉRIUM FÓKUSZBAN TANULMÁNYOK MŰSZAKI-TUDOMÁNYOS ÉS ISMERETTERJESZTŐ Arany László: A Kínai Népköz- Dr. Mujzer Péter: A Magyar Királyi FOLYÓIRATA társaság űrtevékenysége Honvédség páncélos I. rész 28 szervezeteinek részvétele 2017/3. szám. LI. évfolyam a Szovjetunió elleni hadműveletben, 1941-ben 2 A szerkesztőbizottság elnöke: Dr. Hegedűs Ernő: A Bell/Boeing Varga János altábornagy Honvéd Vezérkar főnök koordinációs helyettes (HVK) V–22 Osprey konvertiplán és a jövő billenőrotoros Elnökhelyettes: Baráth István ddtbk repülőgép-fejlesztései 9 c. egyetemi docens (MH LK pk.) A szerkesztőbizottság tagjai: NEMZETKÖZI Amaczi Viktor ny. mk. alez. (HT) HADITECHNIKAI SZEMLE Dr. Balajti István (NATO) Benkó Imre (HM Currus Zrt.) Ocskay István: A német – Dr. Both Előd nyá. csillagász Amaczi Viktor: Repülőmúzeum Ferenczi Ferenc (HM ArmCom KT Zrt.) holland Boxer kerekes Dr. Gáspár Tibor nyá. mk. vörgy. (MKLE) Virginiában 39 harcjármű I. rész 16 Gecse János ezds. (MH LK) Kelecsényi István: Az A–10-es Dr. Germuska Pál (HM HIM) Dr. habil. Gyarmati József mk. alez. (NKE) csatarepülőgép története Dr. Gyulai Gábor nyá mk. ezds. (NKE KMDI) II. rész 22 Prof. Dr. Ványa László mk. ezds. (NKE) Prof. Dr. Haig Zsolt mk. ezds. (NKE) Prof. Dr. Halász László mk. ezds. (NKE) ŰRTECHNIKA Kaposvári László Zoltán ddtbk. (HVK LCsF csf.) Prof. Dr. Kende György mk. ezds. (NKE) Schuminszky Nándor – Arany Prof. Dr. Kiss Péter (SzIE) László: Kína újabb hordozó- Dr. Koller József ezds.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Plan & Berlin Airlift
    Objectives: 1. Explain how the Marshall Plan, the Berlin airlift, and the creation of NATO helped achieve American goals in postwar Europe. 2. Assess the impact of two Communist advances on American foreign policy. 3. Summarize the effects of the cold war on American life. Main Idea: As the cold war intensified, American policy focused on rebuilding and unifying Western Europe. At home, emotionally charged spy cases raised fears of Communist infiltration into American society and government. Marshall Plan & Berlin Airlift • Secretary of State George C. Marshall created an economic plan to rebuild Europe after World War II. The Soviet Union and their Eastern European allies refused to take part in the Marshall Plan, but 16 European countries did accept economic aid from the U.S. ($13 billion over 4 years). • In 1948, to keep people from fleeing communism, Stalin blockaded Berlin. To avoid a war, the U.S. and Britain airlifted supplies to Berlin for 15 months called the Berlin Airlift. 1948 Berlin Airlift NATO & Warsaw Pact In 1949, NATO created a military alliance between 10 Western European countries, the U.S., and Canada. The countries viewed an attack against one country, as an attack against them all. In 1949, China becomes communist and Soviets create their atomic bomb, causing the U.S. to drastically increase peacetime defense spending to enforce Containment. In the 1950s, President Eisenhower will continue with Containment, even though his Secretary of State John Dulles wanted to end communism. The U.S. did not interfere in situations involving Soviet Satellite Nations. President Eisenhower did not want the Cold War to become an actual war.
    [Show full text]
  • Truman Doctrine / Marshall Plan, Comecon & Cominform
    Cold War Aim: To understand how USA used financial develops… aid to fight Communism in post-war Europe (Marshall Plan) Imagine you were reading this at the breakfast table, have a conversation with your neighbour, what might have been said? How does this headline make you feel? What is it trying to say? Key terms: Before WW2 After WW2 Isolationism: Containment: US policy before WW2 was US policy after WW2 was Isolationism, basically staying Containment (limiting the out of other countries affairs, spread of something), basically especially Europe’s as it is “so stopping the spread of far away” anyway! Communism outside a small number of countries What was the impact of the Truman Doctrine? Kennan’s ’Long Telegram’ confirmed Truman’s worst fears Stalin intended to spread Communism across Europe Truman’s military advisors told Truman the Soviets weren't strong enough to fight the USA. Truman said they didn't need to fight to increase their territories and power. What would you do if you were Truman at this stage? What can you see here, and why might this help Stalin out? Post war damage in Europe • Many European countries were in ruins • Homes, factories, infrastructure (roads, railways) • Poverty increases with anger and desperation Communism is actually quite attractive right now, the wealth of the rich will be redistributed (shared) to help us all, not just the few at the top! I see what Stalin is offering us! So, you see, Stalin doesn't need to go to war, he has a perfect scenario, the people are already discontented, he When you put
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTING the Disorder the CFR Is the Deep State Powerhouse Undoing and Remaking Our World
    DEEP STATE DIRECTING THE Disorder The CFR is the Deep State powerhouse undoing and remaking our world. 2 by William F. Jasper The nationalist vs. globalist conflict is not merely an he whole world has gone insane ideological struggle between shadowy, unidentifiable and the lunatics are in charge of T the asylum. At least it looks that forces; it is a struggle with organized globalists who have way to any rational person surveying the very real, identifiable, powerful organizations and networks escalating revolutions that have engulfed the planet in the year 2020. The revolu- operating incessantly to undermine and subvert our tions to which we refer are the COVID- constitutional Republic and our Christian-style civilization. 19 revolution and the Black Lives Matter revolution, which, combined, are wreak- ing unprecedented havoc and destruction — political, social, economic, moral, and spiritual — worldwide. As we will show, these two seemingly unrelated upheavals are very closely tied together, and are but the latest and most profound manifesta- tions of a global revolutionary transfor- mation that has been under way for many years. Both of these revolutions are being stoked and orchestrated by elitist forces that intend to unmake the United States of America and extinguish liberty as we know it everywhere. In his famous “Lectures on the French Revolution,” delivered at Cambridge University between 1895 and 1899, the distinguished British historian and states- man John Emerich Dalberg, more com- monly known as Lord Acton, noted: “The appalling thing in the French Revolution is not the tumult, but the design. Through all the fire and smoke we perceive the evidence of calculating organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanislaviv in the Face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison
    Open Military Studies 2020; 1: 70–78 Research Article Maciej Franz* Stanislaviv in the face of the Polish-Soviet War 1939 Polish Garrison – Soviet Garrison https://10.1515/openms-2020-0107 Received Oct 07, 2020; accepted Dec 11, 2020 Abstract: In 1921-1939 Stanyslaviv was one the bigger polish garrisons. The approach of the war the reason for leaving the town by polish troops. In September of 1939 the garrison in Stanyslaviv was rather small, consisting of small logistic units. Until now the historians have been interested in the face of this particular garrison in those few September days of 1939th. This is an attempt to showcase the most important events that happened while the polish troops were stationed in town and were still trying to provide peace and safety it and its people. Keywords: Polish troops, polish campaign, 1939, Second World War The Polish campaign of 1939, as the first episode of World War II, was not the same in all parts of Poland. For the inhabitants of Stanislaviv and a significant part of the Stanislaviv Voivodeship, it did not turn out to be a war against the Third Reich, but Soviet aggression – it is another episode on the long list of Polish- Russian armed conflicts in history. For people who lived in the western, southern and northern provinces of the Second Polish Republic, the war immediately took on a normal appearance. Air raids by enemy planes began, as a result – bombing, and a few days later the front was changed. The symbols of those days were mass groups of soldiers moving through these territories, both Polish soldiers who had to defend their homeland and those Germans who sought to conquer the Polish state.
    [Show full text]
  • Disfigured History: How the College Board Demolishes the Past
    Disfigured History How the College Board Demolishes the Past A report by the Cover design by Beck & Stone; Interior design by Chance Layton 420 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor Published November, 2020. New York, NY 10017 © 2020 National Association of Scholars Disfigured History How the College Board Demolishes the Past Report by David Randall Director of Research, National Assocation of Scholars Introduction by Peter W. Wood President, National Association of Scholars Cover design by Beck & Stone; Interior design by Chance Layton Published November, 2020. © 2020 National Association of Scholars About the National Association of Scholars Mission The National Association of Scholars is an independent membership association of academics and others working to sustain the tradition of reasoned scholarship and civil debate in America’s colleges and universities. We uphold the standards of a liberal arts education that fosters intellectual freedom, searches for the truth, and promotes virtuous citizenship. What We Do We publish a quarterly journal, Academic Questions, which examines the intellectual controversies and the institutional challenges of contemporary higher education. We publish studies of current higher education policy and practice with the aim of drawing attention to weaknesses and stimulating improvements. Our website presents educated opinion and commentary on higher education, and archives our research reports for public access. NAS engages in public advocacy to pass legislation to advance the cause of higher education reform. We file friend-of-the-court briefs in legal cases defending freedom of speech and conscience and the civil rights of educators and students. We give testimony before congressional and legislative committees and engage public support for worthy reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The
    BECOMING ONE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NATIONAL UNIFICATION IN VIETNAM, YEMEN AND GERMANY A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Conflict Resolution By Min Jung Kim, B.A. Washington, DC May 1, 2009 I owe my most sincere gratitude to my thesis advisor Kevin Doak, Ph.D. for his guidance and support and to Aviel Roshwald, Ph.D. and Tristan Mabry, Ph.D. for detailed and constructive comments. Min Jung Kim ii BECOMING ONE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NATIONAL UNIFICATION IN VIETNAM, YEMEN AND GERMANY Min Jung Kim, B.A. Thesis Advisor: Kevin M. Doak, Ph.D. ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to understand the dynamic processes of modern national unification cases in Vietnam (1976), Yemen (1990) and Germany (1990) in a qualitative manner within the framework of Amitai Etizoni’s political integration theory. There has been little use of this theory in cases of inter-state unification despite its apparent applicability. This study assesses different factors (military force, utilitarian and identitive factors) that influence unification in order to understand which were most supportive of unification and which resulted in a consolidation unification in the early to intermediate stages. In order to answer the above questions, the thesis uses the level of integration as a dependent variable and the various methods of unification as independent variables. The dependent variables are measured as follows: whether unified states were able to protect its territory from potential violence and secessions and to what extent alienation emerged amongst its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlan Cleveland Interviewer: Sheldon Stern Date of Interview: November 30, 1978 Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts Length: 56 Pages
    Harlan Cleveland Oral History Interview—11/30/1978 Administrative Information Creator: Harlan Cleveland Interviewer: Sheldon Stern Date of Interview: November 30, 1978 Location: Cambridge, Massachusetts Length: 56 pages Biographical Note Cleveland, Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs (1961- 1965) and Ambassador to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (1965-1969), discusses the relationship between John F. Kennedy, Adlai E. Stevenson, and Dean Rusk; Stevenson’s role as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations; the Bay of Pigs invasion; the Cuban missile crisis; and the Vietnam War, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed February 21, 1990, copyright of these materials has passed to the United States Government upon the death of the interviewee. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • They Hate US for Our War Crimes: an Argument for US Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights
    UIC Law Review Volume 52 Issue 4 Article 4 2019 They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the ost-HumanP Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) Michael Drake Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Michael Drake, They Hate U.S. for Our War Crimes: An Argument for U.S. Ratification of the Rome Statute in Light of the Post-Human Rights Era, 53 UIC J. MARSHALL. L. REV. 1011 (2019) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol52/iss4/4 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THEY HATE U.S. FOR OUR WAR CRIMES: AN ARGUMENT FOR U.S. RATIFICATION OF THE ROME STATUTE IN LIGHT OF THE POST-HUMAN RIGHTS ERA MICHAEL DRAKE* I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1012 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................ 1014 A. Continental Disparities ......................................... 1014 1. The International Process in Africa ............... 1014 2. The National Process in the United States of America ............................................................ 1016 B. The Rome Statute, the ICC, and the United States ................................................................................. 1020 1. An International Court to Hold National Leaders Accountable ...................................................... 1020 2. The Aims and Objectives of the Rome Statute .......................................................................... 1021 3. African Bias and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Macarthur, DOUGLAS: Papers, 1930-41
    DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS MacARTHUR, DOUGLAS: Papers, 1930-41 Accession: 03-17 Processed by: TB Date Completed: June 24, 2003 The microfilm copy of the papers of Douglas MacArthur, 1935-41 were deposited in the Eisenhower Library by the General Douglas MacArthur Memorial Archives and Library in June, 2003. Approximate number of items: 3 reels of microfilm The original documents remain with the General Douglas MacArthur Memorial Archives and Library of Norfolk, Virginia as RG-1 Records of the U.S. Military Advisor to the Philippine Commonwealth, 1935-1941. Researchers should contact that repository directly regarding copyright restrictions. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE This collection consists of microfilm copies of correspondence, orders, speeches, reports, newspaper clippings and other printed material relating to MacArthur’s work as military adviser to the Philippine Commonwealth during 1935-41. This collection contains materials relating to the creation of a Philippine Army, Philippine Defense, Philippine politics, and general correspondence with MacArthur’s contemporaries. This collection is described at the document or case file level; each folder description contains many individual entries. Reels 1 and 2 contain documents within the MacArthur papers; some of these letters and telegrams are authenticated copies, and not originals. Reel 3 contains photocopies of selected documents from the Official Military Personnel File of Douglas MacArthur, also known as a “201” file. The original documents currently are held by the National Archives and Records Administration at the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, but the documents contained in this microfilm were copied when the file was housed at the Washington National Record Center in Suitland, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • I Was Happy and Flattered to Be Invited to Deliver This Lecture Because Like So Many Others Who Knew Michael Quinlan I Was an Impassioned Admirer
    I was happy and flattered to be invited to deliver this lecture because like so many others who knew Michael Quinlan I was an impassioned admirer. Yet I cannot this evening avoid being a little daunted by the memory of an occasion twenty years ago, when we both attended a talk given by a general newly returned from the Balkans. Michael said to me afterwards: ‘Such a pity, isn’t it, when a soldier who has done really quite well on a battlefield simply lacks the intellectual firepower to explain coherently afterwards what he has been doing’. Few of us, alas, possess the ‘intellectual firepower’ to meet Michael’s supremely and superbly exacting standard. I am a hybrid, a journalist who has written much about war as a reporter and commentator; and also a historian. I am not a specialist in intelligence, either historic or contemporary. By the nature of my work, however, I am a student of the intelligence community’s impact upon the wars both of the 20th century and of our own times. I have recently researched and published a book about the role of intelligence in World War II, which confirmed my impression that while the trade employs some clever people, it also attracts some notably weird ones, though maybe they would say the same about historians. Among my favourite 1939-45 vignettes, there was a Japanese spy chief whose exploits caused him to be dubbed by his own men Lawrence of Manchuria. Meanwhile a German agent in Stockholm warned Berlin in September 1944 that the allies were about to stage a mass parachute drop to seize a Rhine bridge- the Arnhem operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Fear, Appeasement, and the Effectiveness of Deterrence1
    Fear, Appeasement, and the Effectiveness of Deterrence1 Ron Gurantz2 and Alexander V. Hirsch3 June 26, 2015 1We thank Robert Trager, Barry O'Neill, Tiberiu Dragu, Kristopher Ramsay, Robert Powell, Doug Arnold, Mattias Polborn, participants of the UCLA International Relations Reading Group, Princeton Q-APS Interna- tional Relations Conference, and Cowbell working group, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and advice. 2Corresponding Author. University of California, Los Angeles. Department of Political Science, 4289 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472. Phone: (310) 825-4331. Email: [email protected]. 3Associate Professor of Political Science, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Insti- tute of Technology, MC 228-77, Pasadena, CA 91125. Email: [email protected]. Abstract Governments often fear the future intentions of their adversaries. In this paper we show how this fear can make deterrent threats credible under seemingly incredible circumstances. We consider a model in which a defender seeks to deter a transgression with both intrinsic and military value. We examine how the defender's fear of the challenger's future belligerence affects his willingness to respond to the transgression with war. We derive conditions under which even a very minor transgression effectively \tests" for the challenger's future belligerence, which makes the defender's deterrent threat credible even when the transgression is objectively minor and the challenger is ex- ante unlikely to be belligerent. We also show that fear can actually benefit the defender by allowing her to credibly deter. We show the robustness of our results to a variety of extensions, and apply the model to analyze the Turkish Straits Crisis of 1946.
    [Show full text]