South Crofty NI43-101 Technical Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Crofty NI43-101 Technical Report TECHNICAL REPORT AND RESOURCE ESTIMATE ON THE SOUTH CROFTY TIN PROJECT, CORNWALL, UNITED KINGDOM FOR STRONGBOW EXPLORATION INC. LATITUDE 50o 13’ 21” N LONGITUDE 5o 16’ 32” W 30U 337,679 mE 5,565,836 mN NI 43-101 & 43-101F1 Technical Report No. 295 Eugene Puritch, P.Eng. Richard Routledge, P.Geo. Jarita Barry, P.Geo. Yungang Wu, P.Geo. David Burga, P.Geo. Alfred Hayden, P.Eng. Effective Date February 26, 2016 Signing Date: May 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND TERMS OF REFERENCE ..........................................................10 2.1 TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................10 2.2 SOURCES OF INFORMATION .............................................................................10 2.3 UNITS AND CURRENCY ......................................................................................10 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS ...................................................................................12 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................13 4.1 PROPERTY LOCATION .........................................................................................13 4.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND TENURE .........................................................14 4.3 PERMITS ..................................................................................................................16 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY .............................................................................................................18 5.1 ACCESS ...................................................................................................................18 5.2 CLIMATE .................................................................................................................18 5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................19 5.4 INFRASTRUCTURE ...............................................................................................19 5.5 PHYSIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................20 6.0 HISTORY .............................................................................................................................22 6.1 SOUTH CROFTY MINE HISTORY .......................................................................22 6.1.1 Early History ..............................................................................................22 6.1.2 South Crofty Mine History 19th Century to Closure in 1998 ....................23 6.1.3 South Crofty Mine History and Ownership after 1998 Mine Closure .......24 6.2 HISTORIC EXPLORATION ...................................................................................25 6.3 HISTORIC PRODUCTION .....................................................................................25 6.4 HISTORICAL ESTIMATES ....................................................................................26 6.4.1 Owen and Leboutillier (1998) Closure Estimate .......................................26 6.4.2 Additional Historic Estimates ....................................................................27 6.5 PREVIOUS NI 43-101 RESOURCE ESTIMATES ................................................28 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ......................................................31 7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ..........................................................................................31 7.2 LOCAL GEOLOGY .................................................................................................32 7.3 DEPOSIT GEOLOGY ..............................................................................................34 7.4 MINERALIZATION ................................................................................................35 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES .................................................................................................................38 9.0 EXPLORATION ...................................................................................................................40 9.1 WUM PROGRAM 2008-2013 .................................................................................40 9.2 TIN SHIELD PROGRAM ........................................................................................40 10.0 DRILLING ..........................................................................................................................41 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ...........................................43 11.1 SAMPLE PREPARATION AND SECURITY ......................................................43 11.2 ANALYSES ............................................................................................................44 11.2.1 WAI Laboratory/ X-Ray Minerals Laboratory ..........................................44 11.2.2 AGAT Laboratory ......................................................................................45 11.2.3 SGS Laboratory .........................................................................................46 12.0 DATA VERIFICATION ....................................................................................................47 12.1 SITE VISIT AND INDEPENDENT SAMPLING .................................................47 12.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM ..........................48 12.2.1 2010 – 2011 (Batches SD01-47): WAI Prep / X-Ray Minerals Analysis .49 12.2.2 2012 (Pre-August) (Batches SD48-104): AGAT Lab ...............................50 12.2.3 2012 (Post-August) (Batches SD105-135): SGS Lab ................................50 12.3 CHECK ASSAYS ...................................................................................................52 12.4 DATA VERIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ........52 13.0 MINERAL PROCESSING AND METALLURGICAL TESTING ...................................53 14.0 RESOURCE ESTIMATE ...................................................................................................54 14.1 SUMMARY ............................................................................................................54 14.2 SOURCE OF DATA ..............................................................................................56 14.3 DATA VALIDATION ...........................................................................................56 14.4 SOUTH CROFTY SAMPLING DATABASE .......................................................59 14.4.1 Drill Hole Collar Surveys ..........................................................................59 14.4.2 Down Hole Surveys ...................................................................................59 14.4.3 Channel Sample Surveys ...........................................................................60 14.4.4 Assay/Analytical Database ........................................................................61 14.5 CUT-OFF GRADES AND WIREFRAMES ..........................................................64 14.6 ASSAY GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS AND GRADE CAPPING ...........................67 14.7 ASSAY COMPOSITING .......................................................................................74 14.8 BULK DENSITY ....................................................................................................74 14.9 VARIOGRAPHY AND GRADE INTERPOLATION SEARCH STRATEGY ...75 14.10 BLOCK MODEL ...................................................................................................75 14.11 BLOCK MODEL GRADE INTERPOLATION ...................................................76 14.11.1 Depletion Models ...................................................................................76 14.11.2 Search Strategy and Grade Interpolation ...............................................77 14.12 MINERAL RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION ......................................................78 14.13 MINERAL RESOURCE REPORTING ................................................................79 14.14 BLOCK MODEL VALIDATION .........................................................................82 14.14.1 Reconciliation ........................................................................................82 14.14.2 Block Model ...........................................................................................83 14.15 RESOURCE ESTIMATION CONCLUSIONS ....................................................84 14.16 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................84 15.0 MINERAL RESERVE ESTIMATES.................................................................................85 16.0 MINING METHODS .........................................................................................................86 17.0 RECOVERY METHODS ...................................................................................................87 18.0 PROJECT INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................................................................88 19.0 MARKET STUDIES AND CONTRACTS ........................................................................89 20.0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING AND SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT ............................................................................................................................90
Recommended publications
  • Minewater Study
    National Rivers Authority (South Western-Region).__ Croftef Minewater Study Final Report CONSULTING ' ENGINEERS;. NATIONAL RIVERS AUTHORITY SOUTH WESTERN REGION SOUTH CROFTY MINEWATER STUDY FINAL REPORT KNIGHT PIESOLD & PARTNERS Kanthack House Station Road September 1994 Ashford Kent 10995\r8065\MC\P JS TN23 1PP ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 125218 r:\10995\f8065\fp.Wp5 National Rivers Authority South Crofty Minewater Study South Western Region Final Report CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -1- 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. THE SOUTH CROFTY MINE 2-1 2.1 Location____________________________________________________ 2-1 ________2.2 _ Mfning J4istojy_______________________________________ ________2-1. 2.3 Geology 2-1 2.4 Mine Operation 2-2 3. HYDROLOGY 3-1 3.1 Groundwater 3-1 3.2 Surface Water 3-1 3.3 Adit Drainage 3-2 3.3.1 Dolcoath Deep and Penhale Adits 3-3 3.3.2 Shallow/Pool Adit 3-4 3.3.3 Barncoose Adit 3-5 4. MINE DEWATERING 4-1 4.1 Mine Inflows 4-1 4.2 Pumped Outflows 4-2 4.3 Relationship of Rainfall to Pumped Discharge 4-3 4.4 Regional Impact of Dewatering 4-4 4.5 Dewatered Yield 4-5 4.5.1 Void Estimates from Mine Plans 4-5 4.5.2 Void Estimate from Production Tonnages 4-6 5. MINEWATER QUALITY 5-1 5.1 Connate Water 5-2 5.2 South Crofty Discharge 5-3 5.3 Adit Water 5-4 5.4 Acidic Minewater 5-5 Knif»ht Piesold :\10995\r8065\contants.Wp5 (l) consulting enCneers National Rivers Authority South Crofty Minewater Study South Western Region Final Report CONTENTS (continued) Page 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Section.Pmd
    Geoscience in south-west England IMPACT OF MINING ON THE SEDIMENT GEOCHEMISTRY AND MINERALOGY OF THE HELFORD RIVER, CORNWALL D. PIRRIE1, M.R. POWER1, G. ROLLINSON1,3, A.B. CUNDY2 AND D.C. WATKINS1 Pirrie, D., Power, M.R., Rollinson, G., Cundy, A.B. and Watkins, D.C. 2002. Impact of mining on the sediment geochemistry and minerology of the Helford River, Cornwall. Geoscience in south-west England, 10, 323-328. The geochemistry and mineralogy of the intertidal sediments of the Helford River, Cornwall have been examined to assess the potential impact of mining activity on sediment supply. Cores from Polpenwith and Polwheveral creeks show a pulse in Sn (1000-1100 ppm), Cu (800-900 ppm) and Zn (500-600 ppm) at a depth of 30 cm below the present day sediment surface; As and Pb values are typically low and show little down-core variation (<130 ppm As and <78 ppm Pb). Two cores recovered near Gweek have generally low and invariant down-core geochemical signatures, except for a single sample from the base of Core 2 which shows a sudden increase in Sn to >1800 ppm. In addition, two cores were collected from the mouth of Mawgan Creek. Core 4 shows a low but invariant geochemical signature but Core 3 shows a significant down-core increase in Sn (>1900 ppm Sn), Cu (588 ppm) and Zn (1297 ppm). The heavy mineral assemblage is dominated by cassiterite, chalcopyrite and sphalerite, along with less abundant zircon, monazite, ilmenite, rutile/anatase, sphene, wolframite, barite and rare slag products. Diagenetic pyrite, bornite and Fe oxides also occur.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Opportunity for Copper, Tin and Lithium in Cornwall
    A unique opportunity for copper, tin and lithium in Cornwall All information ©Cornish Metals Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Cornish Metals Inc Corporate Presentation Disclaimer This presentation may contain forward-looking statements which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward looking statements may include statements regarding exploration results and budgets, resource estimates, work programs, strategic plans, market price of metals, or other statements that are not statements of fact. Although the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Various factors that may affect future results include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in market prices of metals, foreign currency exchange fluctuations, risks relating to exploration, including resource estimation and costs and timing of commercial production, requirements for additional financing, political and regulatory risks. Accordingly, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements. All technical information contained within this presentation has been reviewed and approved for disclosure by Owen Mihalop, (MCSM, BSc (Hons), MSc, FGS, MIMMM, CEng), Cornish Metals’ Qualified Person as designated by NI 43-101. Readers are further referred
    [Show full text]
  • Cobalt Mineralisation in Cornwall – a New Discovery at Porthtowan
    G.K. Rollinson, N. Le Boutillier and R. Selly COBALT MINERALISATION IN CORNWALL – A NEW DISCOVERY AT PORTHTOWAN G.K. ROLLINSON 1, N. LE BOUTILLIER AND R. SELLY Rollinson, G.K., Le Boutillier, N. and Selly, R. 2018. Cobalt mineralisation in Cornwall – A new discovery at Porthtowan. Geoscience in South-West England, 14, 176–187. Although cobalt mineralisation has been noted in Cornwall and Devon in the mining literature, there are limited details of its production and paragenesis; detailed mineral studies of cobalt are almost non-existent. This paper describes in detail previously unrecorded cobalt mineralisation discovered at Porthtowan, Cornwall, in the vicinity of old workings which are part of the Wheal Lushington group of mines, immediately west of the village. A small number of massive sulphide/gangue samples (taken from a larger sample suite) were chosen to be as representative as possible. Analysis was carried out using a QEMSCAN® automated mineral SEM-EDS system, which found that samples contained up to 50% cobaltite, along with chalcopyrite, bornite, galena, sphalerite, acanthite, erythrite, matildite, chlorargyite and other primary and secondary mineral species. This assemblage is typical of a sub-type of crosscourse mineralisation, with secondary species a result of significant weathering and supergene alteration, complicated by seawater infiltration due to the coastal location. While the number of samples is limited, the detail of the mineralogical assemblage is significant, as it is the first time such an assemblage has been subjected to this level of scientific scrutiny in Cornwall. 1 Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Micro-Geography of Nineteenth Century Cornish Mining?
    MINING THE DATA: WHAT CAN A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TELL US ABOUT THE MICRO-GEOGRAPHY OF NINETEENTH CENTURY CORNISH MINING? Bernard Deacon (in Philip Payton (ed.), Cornish Studies Eighteen, University of Exeter Press, 2010, pp.15-32) For many people the relics of Cornwall’s mining heritage – the abandoned engine house, the capped shaft, the re-vegetated burrow – are symbols of Cornwall itself. They remind us of an industry that dominated eighteenth and nineteenth century Cornwall and that still clings on stubbornly to the margins of a modern suburbanised Cornwall. The remains of this once thriving industry became the raw material for the successful World Heritage Site bid of 2006. Although the prime purpose of the Cornish Mining World Heritage Site team is to promote the mining landscapes of Cornwall and west Devon and the Cornish mining ‘brand’, the WHS website also recognises the importance of the industrial and cultural landscapes created by Cornish mining in its modern historical phase from 1700 to 1914.1 Ten discrete areas are inscribed as world heritage sites, stretching from the St Just mining district in the far west and spilling over the border into the Tamar Valley and Tavistock in the far east. However, despite the use of innovative geographic information system mapping techniques, visitors to the WHS website will struggle to gain a sense of the relative importance of these mining districts in the history of the industry. Despite a rich bibliography associated with the history of Cornish mining the historical geography of the industry is outlined only indirectly.2 The favoured historiographical approach has been to adopt a qualitative narrative of the relentless cycle of boom and bust in nineteenth century Cornwall.
    [Show full text]
  • CORNWALL ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY by Eric Edmonds
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE HISTELEC NEWS No.S23 APRIL 2003 ELECTRICITY IN CORNWALL – PART 2 CORNWALL ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY by Eric Edmonds Continuing our story of “Electricity in Cornwall” with Part 2 extracted from 6 articles in the Trevithick Society Annual Journal No.29 as above written by Eric Edmond, who I failed to say last time, that he is President of the Trevithick Society. This edition also includes three appendices : 2 – Hayle Generating Station, mainly plant details 3 – Areas Never Supplied by CEPC 4 – Staff – Management & Engineering Department ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dolcoath Mine and The Cornwall Electric Power Mine gave an option to Edmundsons to purchase the Act 1902 rights of the 1902 Act, and on 3.10.08 Edmundsons Sinking of the Williams' Shaft had been started in resolved to take up this option. On the same date, the 1896, in order to improve the haulage of ore from the CEPCo., held another meeting at Dolcoath Mine and mine. It was also evident from the start that the three Directors nominated by Edmundsons were existing Cornish pumping engines would soon have to present, and thereafter, Messrs. F Harvey, 0.Wethered be replaced. Consideration was given by the mine to and L.C. Foster are not listed in the Minute Book. Mr. generating their own supply and the Cornwall Electric C.H. Jones took over as Secretary. Power Syndicate was formed, with Mr. F Harvey as Chairman, and Mr. O.Wethered as Vice-Chairman. In 1908 the Royal Cornwall Polytechnic Society They were respectively Chairman and Vice-Chairman chose Camborne as the site for their annual of Dolcoath Mine Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Russell Society, Vol 4 No 2
    JOURNAL OF THE RUSSELL SOCIETY The journal of British Isles topographical mineralogy EDITOR: George Ryba.:k. 42 Bell Road. Sitlingbourn.:. Kent ME 10 4EB. L.K. JOURNAL MANAGER: Rex Cook. '13 Halifax Road . Nelson, Lancashire BB9 OEQ , U.K. EDITORrAL BOARD: F.B. Atkins. Oxford, U. K. R.J. King, Tewkesbury. U.K. R.E. Bevins. Cardiff, U. K. A. Livingstone, Edinburgh, U.K. R.S.W. Brai thwaite. Manchester. U.K. I.R. Plimer, Parkvill.:. Australia T.F. Bridges. Ovington. U.K. R.E. Starkey, Brom,grove, U.K S.c. Chamberlain. Syracuse. U. S.A. R.F. Symes. London, U.K. N.J. Forley. Keyworth. U.K. P.A. Williams. Kingswood. Australia R.A. Howie. Matlock. U.K. B. Young. Newcastle, U.K. Aims and Scope: The lournal publishes articles and reviews by both amateur and profe,sional mineralogists dealing with all a,pecI, of mineralogy. Contributions concerning the topographical mineralogy of the British Isles arc particularly welcome. Not~s for contributors can be found at the back of the Journal. Subscription rates: The Journal is free to members of the Russell Society. Subsc ription rates for two issues tiS. Enquiries should be made to the Journal Manager at the above address. Back copies of the Journal may also be ordered through the Journal Ma nager. Advertising: Details of advertising rates may be obtained from the Journal Manager. Published by The Russell Society. Registered charity No. 803308. Copyright The Russell Society 1993 . ISSN 0263 7839 FRONT COVER: Strontianite, Strontian mines, Highland Region, Scotland. 100 mm x 55 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of a Carbonaceous Gold Ore James S
    Montana Tech Library Digital Commons @ Montana Tech Bachelors Theses and Reports, 1928 - 1970 Student Scholarship 1941 A Study of a Carbonaceous Gold Ore James S. Huckaba Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/bach_theses Part of the Ceramic Materials Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, Geology Commons, Geophysics and Seismology Commons, Metallurgy Commons, Other Engineering Commons, and the Other Materials Science and Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Huckaba, James S., "A Study of a Carbonaceous Gold Ore" (1941). Bachelors Theses and Reports, 1928 - 1970. 147. http://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/bach_theses/147 This Bachelors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Digital Commons @ Montana Tech. It has been accepted for inclusion in Bachelors Theses and Reports, 1928 - 1970 by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Montana Tech. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ! -.. '_ _. r' ...: ,.... ,/'" f • . A STUJ.)Y C.u.RBON.u.CiiOUS GOLD By James S. Huckaba A Thesis ubmitted to the Departmen~ of etallurgy in }artial Fulf11~ent of the Requirouents fer the Degree of 2cchelor of ~cience in Jetallurgical ~n0ineering MONTAI~ SCI! OL OF r.mreB LIBRARY BUTTE " A S'J]UDY OF CARB ADEOUS GOLD ORE By ~mnes S. Huckaba I -4 D 70 s: Thesis Submi tted to the Dep artment of etallurgy in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in ~etallurgical Engineering MONTANA SCHOOL OF MINES LIBRARY, I - TABLE OF CONrENI'S
    [Show full text]
  • The Separation of Galena and Blende from Their Gangue As Practised at the Mines of Sentein, Ariege, France
    3% LUEIS ON THE SEPARATION OF GALENA AND BLENDE. [Selected (Paper No. 1942.) The Separation of Galena and Blende fiom their gangue as practised at the Mines of Sentein, Arihge, France.” By ERNESTDU BOISLUKIS, Assoc. M. Inst. C.E. THISis a record of detailed observations made whilst preparing formarket galena and blende, at the mines of Sentein in the Pyrenees. The oreswere intimately mixed in the proportion of 8 to 10 per cent. of galena, 15 to 20 percent. of blende, and gangue consisting of hard quartz, quartzose rock, schist, &c. The market lead-ore obtained included from 16 to 20 oz. of silver per ton.The blende did not contain sufficient silver for valuation. By experiments in the laboratory, it was found that the galena lost very little silver byfine crushing and washing. The machinery, supplied by Mr. George Green, of Aberystwyth, was erected in existing buildings; but these were so scattered that it is not thoughtnecessary to givea plan of them. Instead of this, a method of arranging the whole of the required plant under one roof, with slight modifications, that would render such proposed dressing-floors more efficient, is given in Plate 7, Figs. 1, the sub- stantialstructure indicated being necessary on account of the climate of the Pyrenees, where protection from frost and snow is indispensable. Water-power was used, being abundant, but the motors are not shown in Figs. 1, for, depending on the position of such proposed floors, steamor water wouldbe used asmight be found most advantageous. Mention is, however, made later on of the power required.
    [Show full text]
  • FIG. 1 I Crush And/Or Grind to Free the Iron Oxide
    Aug. 22, 1967 J‘ E. LAWVER 3,337,328 IRON ORE BENEFICIATION PROCESS Filed June 19, 1964 6 Sheets-Sheet l Heavy Media Tailings Tailing Pond Fines or Semitaconite 25 to 50% Iron FIG. 1 I Crush and/or Grind to Free the Iron Oxide Partial Concentration to Separate Iron Mineral from Waste Product by one of Following Processes or or A B C High Intensity Wet Froth Gravity Magnetic Separation Flotation Separation l l I I Partial Waste Partial Waste Partial Waste Concentrate Product Concentrate Product Concentrate Product L I I . Gravity Gravity Concentrates or Separation of Partial‘ Concentrates Low-grade Hematitic Ore From "An or “all or "ch 40 to 58%‘.Iron Crush and Grind to Liberate Silica Coarse Fraction Minus O. 010" plus 0.003" Fine Fraction‘ Less than 0.003" G to 75% Weight @ 25 to 100% Weight Electrodynamic Process to Separate Froth Flotation Process to Separate Iron Oxides and Silica Iron Oxides and Silica Silica Product to Waste Silica Product to Waste Iron Oxide Concentrate 62 to 65% Iron 5% Silica ' INVENTOR J9me; E. L’ AWl/ER 14 T TORNE Y! Aug. 22, 1967 J. e. LAWVER 3,337,328 IRON ORE BENEFICIATION PROCESS Filed ‘June 19, 1964 6 Sheets-Sheet 2 Crude Ore %Wt. 100. O0 FIG.' 2 %Fe%Insol.4l.l9 39 . 35 4" Screen -4" Ore +4" Ore %wt.84.45 %Wt. 15.39 %E‘e 4O. 19 %E'e 34. 75 %Inso]l . 48. 57 Crush 8 Screen %Fe Rec.l3.59 _ -___.______ +14 Mesh ~~14 Mesh Heavy Media Sands Slimes Separation '7‘Wt- 9-58 Spirals %E‘e 11.78 Sinks Floats ' Concentrate r(‘ailing %Wt.
    [Show full text]
  • Emplacement Styles Within the Land's End Granite, West Cornwall
    Read at the Annual Conference of the Ussher Society, January 1999 EMPLACEMENT STYLES WITHIN THE LAND'S END GRANITE, WEST CORNWALL. T. POWELL, S. SALMON, A.H. CLARK AND R.K. SHAIL Powell, T., Salmon, S., Clark, A.H. and Shail, R.K. (1999). Emplacement styles within the Land's End Granite, west Cornwall. Geoscience in south-west England , 9, 333-339. The Land's End Granite is the youngest of the major plutons of the Cornubian batholith and comprises a number of discrete bodies of both coarse-grained granite (CGG) and fine-grained granite (FGG). Detailed re-mapping of selected parts of the composite Land's End pluton indicates that individual granite intrusions take a variety of forms, including dykes and sub-horizontal sheets. U-Pb (monazite) and 40 Ar-39 Ar (muscovite) age data have been interpreted elsewhere to indicate that the CGG and FGG of the northern "Zennor lobe" were emplaced c. 2-3 m.y. before the CGG and FGG of the southern "St Buryan lobe". Separating the two lobes is a large body of aphyric granite, the "St Just wedge", which is as yet undated. Relationships at Porth Nanven, where an irregular contact is discordant to a magmatic-state fabric in CGG of the St Buryan lobe, and at Porth Ledden, where sheets of aphyric granite intrude CGG, suggest that the St Just wedge is younger than the two main lobes. The composite nature of the pluton is exemplified by variations in grainsize and texture and in the size, abundance and alignment of alkali-feldspar phenocrysts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape from Around 1700 to 1914
    Dates of request for additional information and of receipt from State Party: ICOMOS has sent a letter on 9 Cornwall and West Devon Mining November 2005 and the State Party has provided Landscape (United Kingdom) information on 23 December 2005. Consultations: ICOMOS has consulted its International No 1215 Scientific Committee on Historic Gardens – Cultural Landscapes and TICCIH. IUCN has provided an evaluation of the natural attributes of the site. Literature: Extensive literature on Cornish mining, mining 1. BASIC DATA engines, mining processes, mining transport, mining State Party: United Kingdom settlements, mining social structures, the contribution of Cornwall to the industrial revolution, geology & Name of property: Cornwall and West Devon Mining mineralogy and the Cornish Diaspora, particularly in the Landscape Journal of the Trevithick Society (1973 -), from local Location: Cornwall and Devon Counties publishers such as D Bradford Barton Ltd., Twelveheads Press, Landfall Publications, and Dyllansow Truran, by Date received Prof Roger Burt between 1969 and 1987 on the by the World Heritage Centre: 25 January 2005 organisation of Cornish mines; also unpublished thesis by Included in the Tentative List: 21 June 1999 G Burke, The Cornish Miner and the Cornish Mining Industry 1870-1921, 1981. International Assistance from the World Heritage Fund for preparing the nomination: No Date of ICOMOS approval of this report: 10 April 2006 Category of property: In terms of the categories of cultural property set out in 3. THE PROPERTY Article 1 of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, this is a Description site. In terms of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (2 The extensive nominated site consists of the most February 2005) paragraph 47, it is also a cultural authentic and historically important surviving components landscape.
    [Show full text]