DOCSLIB.ORG

March 29, 2011 Vol. 60, No. 7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
March 29, 2011 Vol. 60, No. 7 March 29, 2011 Vol. 60, No. 7 Telephone 971-673-1111 Fax 971-673-1100 [email protected] http://oregon.gov/dhs/ph/cdsummary OREGON PUBLIC HEALTHOGY DIVISIONPUBLICATION • OREGON OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH HEALTH AUTHORITY DIVISION ORECON DEPATMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES EVERYTHING YOUR PATIENTS WANT TO KNOW ABOUT RADIATION* (*AND AREN’T AFRAID TO ASK) n March 11 at 2:46 p.m. local demolished the containment structure risk to human health, however, comes time† a*magnitude-9.0 earth- around the reactor, and dispersed from internal exposure. quake struck 109 miles east of radioactive material thousands of feet Internal exposure results from: O • Inhaling particles in contaminated Fukushima off northeastern Honshu, into the atmosphere, spreading medi- Japan. In addition to destroying many cally significant amounts of it up to air, or 2 communities and leaving more than 500 km away. Nothing like that hap- • Swallowing particles in contaminated 20,000 dead or missing, the earth- pened in Fukushima. food or water. quake and resulting tsunami knocked Three types of ionizing radiation: Age: Children are growing and developing, and as a consequence are out cooling systems at the six-reactor alpha, beta and gamma, are relevant. at higher risk of adverse health effects Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power From high school chemistry you will recall that when a radioactive sub- from radiation. (This is true not only plant. As this issue goes to press, the stance decays, it can release alpha in exposures that might result from an conditions at the plant remain serious particles, i.e. two protons and two accidental radiation release, but also but appear to be coming under con- neutrons; beta particles, i.e. electrons; from radiological imaging.) trol. Radiation releases have endan- or gamma rays, i.e. photons. (For more ISOTOPES BEHAVING BADLY gered workers attempting to control information on these, type “IAEA ra- 1 Several radioactive fission prod- the situation at the plant, but in the dior” into an Internet search engine.) ucts could be released from a reactor, absence of a large, explosive release but three are of particular concern: of radiation, the 4,643 miles between iodine 131, cesium 137, and strontium How much is 100 nanorem? Astoria and Fukushima make it very 90. These are produced in quantities unlikely that Oregon will see levels th sufficient to cause illness in the setting of radiation that pose a health risk • 1/500,000 of the dose acquired of a large radiation release, and they from this event. As expected, routine from rocks, bricks and sun in a can “volatilize” and spread if a large typical day monitoring of environmental samples explosion leads to high-altitude, broad • 1/100,000th of the radiation received has detected trace amounts (about dispersion. In addition, their half-lives from a typical chest x-ray 100 nanorems) of iodine 131 and are long enough that they could stick • 1/50,000,000th of the anticipate dose around to do some damage. “Nuclear other radioactive isotopes from Japan at which potassium iodide is rec- half-life” refers to the amount of time — well below any level of concern ommended for infants (5 rems) (Box); but your patients may have • After 80,000 years of exposure at it takes for half of the isotope to decay questions nonetheless. In this issue this level, potassium iodide is into other elements. This is different of the CD Summary, we review basic recommended from the biological half-life, which is information about ionizing radiation, the amount of time needed for half the the health effects it can produce, and isotope load to be excreted from the The duration of exposure is also body. what we can do about it should a risk important. Cumulative exposure is the 131 for significant exposure ever arise I is easily absorbed by the body key risk factor for the chronic health if it is ingested or inhaled, and con- here in Oregon. effects of radiation, and many of the centrates in the thyroid gland. Its RADIATION RISK FACTORS commonly used measures to gauge nuclear half life is only 8.1 days, but its The risk of illness from radiation health effects describe degree of expo- accumulation in the thyroid can lead depends upon the amount and type sure per unit time. to several forms of thyroid disease, of radiation, the duration of exposure, The route of exposure — how radio- including cancer.3 the route by which exposure occurs, active particles come into contact with 137Cs has a half-life of 30 years. The and the age of the person exposed. the body — affects exposure duration body handles it like potassium, so if it The amount of radiation released and has an independent effect on risk is ingested, it is distributed through- in an event depends on how much of radiation-induced illness. out the soft tissues. It can increase the radioactive material is present and on External exposure occurs when par- risk for a variety of soft-tissue cancers.4 the force with which it is dispersed. ticles are released into the air and then 90Sr (half-life 29 years) is handled by The disaster at Chernobyl, Ukrainian fall onto surfaces. Radioactive isotopes the body like calcium. Though 70%– SSR in 1986 featured run-away fission, can be easily washed from skin and 80% of it is excreted, the remaining followed by a large explosion that other surfaces, but if left on the skin in 20%–30% of ingested 90Sr is incorpo- † large amounts and for prolonged peri- *9:46 P.M. on March 10 Pacific Standard Time ods, they can lead to burns. The main The CD Summary (ISSN 0744-7035) is published biweekly, free of CD SUMMARY charge, by the Oregon Health Authority, Office of Disease Prevention and PERIODICALS Epidemiology, 800 NE Oregon St., Portland, OR 97232 March 29, 2011 POSTAGE Periodicals postage paid at Portland, Oregon. Postmaster—send address changes to: Vol 60, No. 7 PAID CD Summary, 800 NE Oregon St., Suite 730, Portland, OR 97232 Portland, Oregon If you need this material in an alternate format, call us at 971-673-1111. If you would prefer to have your CD Summary delivered by e-mail, zap your request to [email protected]. Please include your full name and mailing address (not just your e-mail address), so that we can purge you from our print mailing list, thereby saving trees, taxpayer dollars, postal worker injuries, etc. rated into bones and teeth. Significant birth defects in the child, although the FOR MORE INFORMATION exposure is associated with increased greatest risk in this setting is miscar- Advise your patients to call our risk of leukemia, bone cancer, and riage. information line at 877-290-6767; cancers of the soft tissues adjacent to • In some cases, radiation may cause or to check our web site: http://pub- bone.5,6 mutations in a parent’s DNA, lead- lic.health.oregon.gov/Preparedness/ HEALTH EFFECTS: ACUTE AND ing to genetic illness in the child of an CurrentHazards/Pages/index.aspx CHRONIC exposed person. REFERENCES Acute Radiation Sickness occurs COUNTERMEASURES TO AVOID 1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Fu- following exposure to a massive dose EXPOSURE AND ILLNESS kushima nuclear accident update log. www. iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01. of radiation in a short time, as hap- We won’t be needing these in the html. Accessed 25 Mar 2011. pens near a nuclear bomb explosion or foreseeable future, but there are a few 2. International Atomic Energy Agency. Fre- very close to a severe nuclear power simple strategies that could be used quently asked Chernobyl questions. www. plant accident. Historical examples of to decrease the likelihood of exposure iaea.org/newscenter/features/chernobyl-15/ victims of such exposure include the and illness, should the need for them cherno-faq.shtml. Accessed 20 Mar 2011. 3. CDC. Radioisotope brief: Iodine-131. www. first responders at Chernobyl; resi- arise. These include staying indoors bt.cdc.gov/radiation/isotopes/pdf/iodine.pdf. dents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; and (“sheltering in place”) if radiation Accessed 20 Mar 2011. Louis Slotin and Harry Daghlian, two levels become high; or evacuating if 4. U.S Environmenal Protection Agency. Ce- Manhattan Project scientists who were recommended by public health author- sium. www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/ exposed to acute, lethal doses of radia- ities. Persons exposed to >3,000 mil- cesium.html. Accessed: 20 Mar 2011. 137 5. U.S Environmenal Protection Agency. tion during experiments at Los Ala- lirems of Cs can take Prussian blue, Strontium www.epa.gov/radiation/radio- 7 mos, New Mexico, during 1945–1946. a prescription medicine that binds nuclides/strontium.html. Accessed 20 Mar Acute radiation sickness begins cesium in the gut, speeding its elimi- 2011. within minutes to hours of exposure nation from the body and decreasing 6. Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease and can include: its biological half-life from 110 days to Registry. Interaction profiles: introduction 8,9 www.atsdr.cdc.gov/interactionprofiles/IP-08/ • Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea about 30 days. Persons exposed to ip08-c1.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2011. 131 • Skin burns or rashes I can take potassium iodide to satu- 7. Alsop S. The strange death of Louis Slotin. • Bone marrow toxicity, with subse- rate the thyroid with iodine, thereby Saturday Evening Post, Mar. 6, 1954. quent bleeding and risk of infection decreasing uptake of the radioactive 8. CDC. Prussian blue fact sheet. www.bt.cdc. • Death isotope. The recommended threshold gov/radiation/prussianblue.asp. Accessed Chronic Health Effects from radia- 21 Mar 2011. for treatment in pregnant women 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radiation Poisoning , Also Called Radiation Sickness Or a Creeping Dose , Is a Form of Damage to Organ Tissue Due to Excessive Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
    Radiation poisoning , also called radiation sickness or a creeping dose , is a form of damage to organ tissue due to excessive exposure to ionizing radiation . The term is generally used to refer to acute problems caused by a large dosage of radiation in a short period, though this also has occurred with long term exposure. The clinical name for radiation sickness is acute radiation syndrome ( ARS ) as described by the CDC .[1][2][3] A chronic radiation syndrome does exist but is very uncommon; this has been observed among workers in early radium source production sites and in the early days of the Soviet nuclear program. A short exposure can result in acute radiation syndrome; chronic radiation syndrome requires a prolonged high level of exposure. Radiation exposure can also increase the probability of contracting some other diseases, mainly cancer , tumours , and genetic damage . These are referred to as the stochastic effects of radiation, and are not included in the term radiation sickness. The use of radionuclides in science and industry is strictly regulated in most countries (in the U.S. by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ). In the event of an accidental or deliberate release of radioactive material, either evacuation or sheltering in place are the recommended measures. Radiation sickness is generally associated with acute (a single large) exposure. [4][5] Nausea and vomiting are usually the main symptoms. [5] The amount of time between exposure to radiation and the onset of the initial symptoms may be an indicator of how much radiation was absorbed. [5] Symptoms appear sooner with higher doses of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEETING Meridel Rubenstein 1995
    THE MEETING Meridel Rubenstein 1995 Palladium prints, steel, single-channel video Video assistance by Steina Video run time 4:00 minutes Tia Collection The Meeting consists of twenty portraits of people from San Ildefonso Pueblo and Manhattan Project physicists—who met at the home of Edith Warner during the making of the first atomic bomb—and twenty photographs of carefully selected objects of significance to each group. In this grouping are people from San Ildefonso Pueblo and the objects they selected from the collections of the Museum of Indian Arts and Culture to represent their culture. 1A ROSE HUGHES 2A TALL-NECKED JAR 3A BLUE CORN 4A SLEIGH BELLS 5A FLORENCE NARANJO Rose Hughes holding a photograph of WITH AVANYU One of the most accomplished and (Museum of Indian Arts and Culture) Married to Louis Naranjo; her father, Tony Peña, who organized (plumed serpent) made by Julian and recognized of the San Ildefonso Sleigh bells are commonly used in granddaughter of Ignacio and Susana the building of Edith Warner’s second Maria Martinez, ca. 1930 (Museum of potters. Like many women from the ceremonial dances to attract rain. Aguilar; daughter of Joe Aguilar, who house. Hughes worked at Edith Indian Arts and Culture) Edith Warner pueblos, she worked as a maid for the Tilano Montoya returned with bells like helped Edith Warner remodel the Warner’s with Florence Naranjo one was shown a pot like this one in 1922 Oppenheimers. these from Europe, where he went on tearoom. Edith called her Florencita. summer. She recalls that Edith once on her first visit to San Ildefonso, in the tour with a group of Pueblo dancers.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fallout and Intelligence As Secrets, Problems, and Limitations on the Arms Race, 1940-1964
    © Copyright 2016 Michael R. Lehman NUISANCE TO NEMESIS: NUCLEAR FALLOUT AND INTELLIGENCE AS SECRETS, PROBLEMS, AND LIMITATIONS ON THE ARMS RACE, 1940-1964 BY MICHAEL R. LEHMAN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Lillian Hoddeson, Chair Professor Kristin Hoganson, Co-Chair Professor Michael Weissman Professor Robert Jacobs, Hiroshima City University Abstract Fallout sampling and other nuclear intelligence techniques were the most important sources of United States strategic intelligence in the early Cold War. Operated as the Atomic Energy Detection System by a covert Air Force unit known as AFOAT-1, the AEDS detected emissions and analyzed fallout from Soviet nuclear tests, as well as provided quantitative intelligence on the size of the Russian nuclear stockpile. Virtually unknown because the only greater Cold War secret than nuclear weapons was intelligence gathered about them, data on the Soviet threat produced by AFOAT-1 was an extraordinary influence on early National Intelligence Estimates, the rapid growth of the Strategic Air Command, and strategic war plans. Official guidance beginning with the first nuclear test in 1945 otherwise suggested fallout was an insignificant effect of nuclear weapons. Following AFOAT-1’s detection of Soviet testing in fall 1949 and against the cautions raised about the problematic nature of higher yield weapons by the General Advisory Committee, the Atomic Energy Commission’s top scientific advisers, President Harry Truman ordered the AEC to quickly build these extraordinarily powerful weapons, testing the first in secrecy in November 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons FAQ (NWFAQ) Organization Back to Main Index
    Nuclear Weapons FAQ (NWFAQ) Organization Back to Main Index This is a complete listing of the decimally numbered headings of the Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions, which provides a comprehensive view of the organization and contents of the document. Index 1.0 Types of Nuclear Weapons 1.1 Terminology 1.2 U.S. Nuclear Test Names 1.3 Units of Measurement 1.4 Pure Fission Weapons 1.5 Combined Fission/Fusion Weapons 1.5.1 Boosted Fission Weapons 1.5.2 Staged Radiation Implosion Weapons 1.5.3 The Alarm Clock/Sloika (Layer Cake) Design 1.5.4 Neutron Bombs 1.6 Cobalt Bombs 2.0 Introduction to Nuclear Weapon Physics and Design 2.1 Fission Weapon Physics 2.1.1 The Nature Of The Fission Process 2.1.2 Criticality 2.1.3 Time Scale of the Fission Reaction 2.1.4 Basic Principles of Fission Weapon Design 2.1.4.1 Assembly Techniques - Achieving Supercriticality 2.1.4.1.1 Implosion Assembly 2.1.4.1.2 Gun Assembly 2.1.4.2 Initiating Fission 2.1.4.3 Preventing Disassembly and Increasing Efficiency 2.2 Fusion Weapon Physics 2.2.1 Candidate Fusion Reactions 2.2.2 Basic Principles of Fusion Weapon Design 2.2.2.1 Designs Using the Deuterium+Tritium Reaction 2.2.2.2 Designs Using Other Fuels 3.0 Matter, Energy, and Radiation Hydrodynamics 3.1 Thermodynamics and the Properties of Gases 3.1.1 Kinetic Theory of Gases 3.1.2 Heat, Entropy, and Adiabatic Compression 3.1.3 Thermodynamic Equilibrium and Equipartition 3.1.4 Relaxation 3.1.5 The Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution Law 3.1.6 Specific Heats and the Thermodynamic Exponent 3.1.7 Properties of Blackbody
    [Show full text]
  • Early Criticality Accidents
    An Historic Perspective The Real Basis of Nuclear Criticality Safety Presented at NCSD 2013 Wilmington, North Carolina September 30, 2013 Dick Malenfant Los Alamos National Laboratory - Retired Based on work by Otto Frisch, Raemer Schreiber, Harry Daghlian, Louis Slotin, and others Although I have worked in the field for over fifty years, I do not feel that I have been accepted by the Criticality Safety Community – because Although I have worked in the field for over fifty years, I do not feel that I have been accepted by the Criticality Safety Community – because I have spent a large portion of my life making systems critical – rather than keeping systems from going critical! Nevertheless, it has been my privilege to have worked with GIANTS… Hugh Paxton Dixon Callihan Gordon Hansen John Orndoff Bob Keepin Bob Long Bob Jefferson Gene Plassmann Dave Smith Raemer Schreiber and others…. ALWAYS REMEMBER -- You don’t Plan To Have An Accident! BECAUSE An Accident is an UNPLANNED Event Ac-ci-dent 1.An unexpected and undesirable event. 2.Something that occurs unexpectedly or unintentionally 3.A circumstance or attribute that is not essential to the nature of something. 4.Fortune or chance What I would like to have you take from my presentation: Neither the Code of Federal Regulations, ANSI Standards, DOE Orders, nor even training prevents ACCIDENTS! Safety is a state of mind, attention to detail, and a result of experience… Although you cannot teach safety, you can study the lessons of the past and avoid repeating the environment that has resulted in accidents! In considering the details of the following three accidents, I would like to make them personal by putting us in the position of the participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan District History Project Y: the Los Alamos Project
    ., r . ) LA]MS-2532 (vol. ‘ II) I I - ..- [ 4 DS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY ‘ THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIAo LOSALAMOS NEW MEXICO ‘} , \ J – MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY = ->=0 c— PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT ——— . .. i DO NOT CIRCULATE PERMANENT RETENTION + 1 .— . “. 1-- I .. ,..: ,- . ..= ~ .- ., . ., LEGAL NOTICE This repo~t was prepared as an account of Govern- ment sponsored work. Neitherthe UnitedStates, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Com- mission: A. Makesanywarrantyor representation,expressed . ‘or implied, withrespect to theaccuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information containedin this report, or that theuse of anyinformation,apparatus,method,or pro- cess disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damagesresultingfrom the use of any informa- . tion, apparatus,method,or process disclosed in this re- port. As used in theabove, “person actingon behalf of the Commission” includes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employeeof suchcontractor, to theextent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any informationpursuantto his em- ploymentor contract with the Commission, or his employ- ment with such contractor. ... Printed in USA Piice $ 2.00. Availablefrom the Office of Technical Servtces U. S. Departmentof Commerce Washington25, D. C. a . i . ..- . LAMS-2532(Vol. Ii) SPECIALDISTRIBUTION LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY OF THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIA LOS ALAMOS NEW MEXICO REPORTWRITTEN:1946 and 194’7 REPORT DISTRIBUTED:December 1, 1961 MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT ● VOL. II. AUGUST 1945 THROUGH DECEMBER 1946 by ● Edith C.
    [Show full text]
  • Plutonium an Overview
    Plutonium An overview PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:52:20 UTC Contents Articles Overview 1 Plutonium 1 Allotropes 23 Allotropes of plutonium 23 Isotopes 25 Isotopes of plutonium 25 Compounds and mixtures 34 Plutonium borides 34 Plutonium carbide 35 Plutonium hexafluoride 36 Plutonium hydride 38 Plutonium(III) chloride 39 Plutonium(III) fluoride 40 Plutonium(IV) fluoride 42 Plutonium(IV) oxide 43 Plutonium-gallium alloy 45 MOX fuel 48 Environment 52 Plutonium in the environment 52 References Article Sources and Contributors 61 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 62 Article Licenses License 63 1 Overview Plutonium Plutonium Appearance silvery white General properties Name, symbol, number plutonium, Pu, 94 Pronunciation /pluːˈtoʊniəm/ ploo-toe-nee-əm Element category actinide Group, period, block n/a, 7, f −1 Standard atomic weight (244) g·mol Electron configuration [Rn] 5f6 7s2 Electrons per shell 2, 8, 18, 32, 24, 8, 2 (Image) Physical properties Phase solid Density (near r.t.) 19.816 g·cm−3 Liquid density at m.p. 16.63 g·cm−3 Melting point 912.5 K,639.4 °C,1182.9 °F Boiling point 3505 K,3228 °C,5842 °F Heat of fusion 2.82 kJ·mol−1 Heat of vaporization 333.5 kJ·mol−1 Specific heat capacity (25 °C) 35.5 J·mol−1·K−1 Vapor pressure Plutonium 2 P/Pa 1 10 100 1 k 10 k 100 k at T/K 1756 1953 2198 2511 2926 3499 Atomic properties Oxidation states 7, 6, 5, 4, 3 (amphoteric oxide) Electronegativity 1.28 (Pauling scale) Ionization
    [Show full text]
  • Thirty Minutes Before the Dawn—Trinity Alan B
    Submitted to ANS/NT (2021), LA-UR-21-21007 Thirty Minutes Before the Dawn—Trinity Alan B. Carr* Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 The Trinity test of July 16, 1945, marked the scientific apex of the Manhattan Project. Often recognized as the symbolic birth of the nuclear age, Trinity’s multifaceted legacy remains just as captivating and complex today as it did 75 years ago. This paper examines why the test was necessary from a technical standpoint, shows how Los Alamos scientists planned the event, and explores the physical and emotional aftermaths of Trinity. The author also uses rarely accessed original records to reconstruct the story of Trinity’s health hazards, as seen through the eyes of radiation technicians and medical doctors as events unfolded. Trinity was conducted as the Potsdam Conference began, weeks after the collapse of Nazi Germany. It was considered necessary to let President Harry S. Truman know whether the United States possessed a nuclear capability ahead of his negotiations with Joseph Stalin, the Soviet premier. The author examines the competing priorities that drove the timetable for the test: international politics, security, and safety. Three weeks after Trinity, a gun-assembled enriched-uranium bomb called Little Boy was used against the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later, Fat Man, a weaponized version of the imploding Trinity device, was dropped on Nagasaki. The author briefly examines these strikes and what impact they may have had on the Japanese surrender. The paper concludes by examining the legacy of the Trinity test 75 years into the age it helped usher in.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons Journal March/April 2003
    weapons March/April 2003 I HERT I HE Microstructure I Recycling I DARHT Approval I I Stockpile Stewardship Exhibit I Weapons Science and Engineering at Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 of Point Raymond J. Juzaitis Deputy Associate Director • View Weapons Physics Informatics, Complexity Science, and National Security Informatics and complexity science play a critical environment, climate, and infrastructure. This abil­ role in much of what we do at Los Alamos. In­ ity requires integrating the Laboratory’s strengths formatics uses a suite of information management in computation and large­scale simulation, experi­ tools to understand, manage, and predict complex mental science, and theory and modeling. phenomena. Complexity science requires an under­ standing of the global nature of complex systems Stockpile Stewardship and crosses the boundaries that have classically Our special responsibility as stewards of the nuclear separated the scientific disciplines. stockpile changed in 1992, when President Bush initi­ ated a nuclear testing moratorium and, later, when Los Alamos has long been involved in studies of President Clinton created the Stockpile Ste­ardship complex systems, from our early work on turbu­ Program to ensure the safety, reliability, and per­ lence in the 1940s and continuing through the formance of the nuclear stockpile in the absence of pioneering work of Metropolis, Stein, and Ulam on non­ Stockpile stewardship motivates us to pursue a predictive linear systems; understanding of extremely complex systems and high-impact our research in problems such as the spread of disease chaos theory; and and the impact of global climate change. the breakthrough work of Mitch­ ell Feigenbaum in the late 1970s that led to the full­system nuclear testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic John: the Bomb As Fetish
    Volume 6 | Issue 12 | Article ID 3000 | Dec 01, 2008 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Atomic John: The Bomb as Fetish Lawrence S. Wittner, D Samuels Atomic John: The Bomb as Fetish mentioned in the article's subtitle. Indeed, he previously had worked as a Lawrence S. Wittner and Davidcommercial photographer and in other Samuels jobs that provided him with considerable skill in visual measurement, as well as technical knowledge. The Bomb as Fetish And stranger currents swirl below the Introduction by Lawrence S. Wittner story line, especially Coster-Mullen's obsession with producing a precise "Atomic John," an intriguing article that physical model of the atomic bomb. As appeared in theNew Yorker on Samuels shows us, Coster-Mullen has not December 15, 2008, is particularlyonly devoted many years of his life to remarkable for what it reveals about the studying the details of the weapons used inability of some Americans to confront to destroy two Japanese cities, but is the consequences of the U.S. atomic absolutely obsessed with them. He bombing of Japan. maintains extensive atomic bomb On the surface, it is the story of John memorabilia and is constantly on the Coster-Mullen, a 61-year-old "trucklookout for more. In addition, during driver" from Waukesha, Wisconsin, who, lengthy travels with Samuels across the through years of painstaking effort, has country to nuclear-related sites, he talked succeeded better than the ostensible obsessively, non-stop, about the experts have in constructing a precise construction of atomic bombs. model of the weapon that annihilated This fanatical concern with what are, Hiroshima.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Assemblies: Dragon Burst Assembly & Solution Assemblies
    Submitted to ANS/NT (2021). LA-UR-21-20906 DRAFT Critical Assemblies: Dragon Burst Assembly & Solution Assemblies Robert Kimpland, Travis Grove, Peter Jaegers, Richard Malenfant, and William Myers* Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 Abstract: This work reviewed the historical literature associated with the Dragon experiment and Water Boiler reactors operated at Los Alamos during the Manhattan Project. Frisch’s invited talk given at the Fast Burst Reactor Conference held the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, NM in 1969 is quoted. From the literature review, basic models for the Dragon experiment and for a Water Boiler type assembly (aqueous homogeneous reactor) were created that can be used for conducting multi-physics simulations for criticality excursion studies. This methodology utilizes the coupled neutronic-hydrodynamic method to perform a time-dependent dynamic simulation of a criticality excursion. MCNP® was utilized to calculate important nuclear kinetic parameters that were incorporated into the models. Simulation results compared reasonably well with historic data. Keywords: Manhattan Project; Dragon Experiment; Water Boiler Reactors; Multiphysics Simulation; Coupled Neutronic-Hydrodynamic Method. theoretical models. The experimenters gained a wealth of Introduction data and experience on reactor operations that still form Lise Meitner and her nephew, Otto Frisch, discovered the basis of nuclear operations practiced today. nuclear fission and named it such in a February 1939 issue of Nature. Physicists throughout the world immediately History and Design Description of the Dragon realized that the emission of 2-3 neutrons from the Assembly process could lead to a chain reaction and the release of a In October 1944, Otto R.
    [Show full text]