Investigations of the Life Cycle of the Peritrich Ciliate Zoothamnium Intermedium in Chesapeake Bay
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2013 Investigations of the Life Cycle of the Peritrich Ciliate Zoothamnium intermedium in Chesapeake Bay Sikai Peng College of William and Mary - Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Peng, Sikai, "Investigations of the Life Cycle of the Peritrich Ciliate Zoothamnium intermedium in Chesapeake Bay" (2013). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539617939. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.25773/v5-7ka7-3t02 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigations of the Life Cycle of the Peritrich CiliateZoothamnium intermedium in Chesapeake Bay A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the School of Marine Science The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science by Sikai Peng 2013 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Sikai Peng Approved, by the Committee, November 2013 Ryan B. Carnegie, Ph.D. Committee Chairman/Advisor Kam Wryfang, Ph.D. Co/Advisor Eric J. Hjilton, Ph.D. Hamish J. Small, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................... iv LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................vi LIST OF FIGURES......................... vii ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................viii INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................2 MATERIALS AND METHODS............... 9 RESULTS.............................................. 17 DISCUSSION.................................................................................. 21 SUMMARY.............................................................................................................. 26 FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS.................................................................................27 GLOSSARY...................................................................................... 47 LITERATURE CITED................................................................................................. 48 VITA.......................................................................................................................................... 54 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The support and guidance provided by my advisor Dr. Ryan Carnegie and co-advisor Dr. Kam Tang throughout the course of this research are gratefully acknowledged. Successful completion of this project would not have been possible without their patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and immense knowledge. I also wish to thank my other advisory committee members, Dr. Eric Hilton and Dr. Hamish Small for guidance, constructive suggestions, helpful advice and encouragement to pursue this research, and I’d like to thank Dr. Jeffrey D Shields for his advice and help with microscopy. The following people are also gratefully acknowledged: My laboratory colleagues: Nancy Stokes, Rita Crockett, Katherine Blackshear, Miyoung Cho, Lydia Bienlien, Samantha Bickel, Haley Garrison, Jami Ivory, and Yuan Dong for their help at work and friendship in my life. My officemates: Ann Arfken, Jessica Lisa, Haley Garrison, Jami Ivory and Lucia Safi, for the happy memories, everyday joy and care in the office and for their friendship. My “New Kids” classmates: Michel Nalovic, Daniel Kaufman, Haley Garrison, Mark Stratton, Lela Schlenker, Anna Mosby, Carissa Gervasi, Miram Gleiber, Patricia O'Leary, Britt Dean, Solomon Chak, Zhengui Wang, and Xiaoteng Shen for their friendship, help and the good times we shared. My friends: Brandon Conroy, Jenna Luek, Kattie McMillan, Joshua Stone, Kate Ruck, Sean Charles, Brendan Turley, Alexander Renaud, Jeanna Hudson, Wes Hudson, Ryan Schloesser, Matthew Freedman, Alison Deary, Julia Moriarty, Cassandra Glaspie, Emily Egginton, Emily French, Randy Jones, AJ Johnson, Michael Kuschner, Hadley Mcintosh, Anna Murphy, Lauren Nys, Kristen Omori, Itchika Sivaipram, and Amy Then for their friendship and the beauty and joy they added to my life here. Dr. John E Graves, Dr. Deborah Steinberg, Dr. Robert Latour, Dr. Stephen Kaattari, Dr. Wolfgang Vogelbein, and Dr. Robert Hale for the knowledge and help in and out of the classroom. Joe Cope for his help with the identification of copepods. William Jones and Patrice Mason for their help with microscopy. Dr. Laura R.P. Utz for her help with my research. Corinne Audemard, Mary Ann Vogelbein, registrar Jennifer Hay, and housekeeper Phyllis Spriggs for their help and kindness. Alison Deary and Leah Fitchett for their help with field collections and sample analysis. My fellow Chinese students: Zhengui Wang, Linmei She, Xiaoteng Shen, Solomon Chak, Belinda Leong, Xiao Liu, Yi-Cheng Teng, Yongjin Xiao, Luyao Peng, Qubin Qin, Jincheng Wang, Chia-Yu Wu, Tianwu Huang, Zhuo Liu, Bin Nie, Junpeng Zhao, Fei Ye, Yang Feng, Xiaoyu Xu, Jie Gao, Jiabi Du, Xin Yu, Haixing Wang, Hongzhou Xu, Bo Hong, Ya Wang, Huiru Li, Jinfeng Zhang, and Dean Wu for the friendship, help, laughter and happiness. My parents, brother and other family members for their love and support. This work was supported by Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS) and a grant from SunTrust Fellowship. LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Morphological comparison of live specimens Zoothamniumof sp. on different copepod hosts....................................................................................................................... 28 2. Different sites between rDNA sequences obtained from Zoothamnium intermedium on Acartia tonsa and Pseudodiaptomus pelagicus.............. 29 3. Prevalence and load of epibiont Zoothamnium intermedium on copepods in York River ........................................................................................................ 30 4. DNA extraction and PCR results for water samples....................................... 31 5. DNA extraction and PCR results for sediment samples.................................................. 32 6. Attachment ofZoothamnium intermedium telotrochs to potential copepod hosts........33 7. Attachment prevalence and attachment success for different copepod groups.............37 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure Captions.......................... 38 1. Copepod, water and sediment sampling location.................................... 39 2. Primers design for SSU and ITS sequencing and specific PCR assays of Zoothamnium intermedium.................................................................................................40 3. Zoothamnium intermedium onAcartia tonsa.............................................................. .41 4. Parsimony bootstrap tree of peritrich ciliate SSU rDNA sequences...........................42 5. Zoothamnium intermedium loads on different sizes.of Acartia tonsa...........................43 6. Zoothamnium intermedium loads on different sizes ofPseudodiaptomus pelagicus..................................................... 44 7. Encystment ofZoothamnium intermedium telotroch fromPseudodiaptomus pelagicus............................................................................................................................... 45 ABSTRACT Epibiosis is a common phenomenon in aquatic environments. The chitinous exoskeletons of crustaceans provide stable surfaces for attachment and growth of epibiotic microorganisms. Epibiont ciliate colonization on copepods is commonly recorded but has rarely been studied in Chesapeake Bay; also, little is known about the life cycles of epibiont ciliates in the bay. The present work focuses on the life cycle ofZoothamnium intermedium in Chesapeake Bay. A peritrich ciliate belonging to the genus Zoothamnium was found as an epibiont on the calanoid copepodsAcartia tonsa and Pseudodiaptomus pelagicus during the summer in the York River, a tributary of the lower Chesapeake Bay. By using primers conservative for the genus Zoothamnium, two almost identical (99.8% similarity) 2171-bp ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences containing the complete small subunit (SSU) and partial internal transcribed spacer (ITS) rDNA regions were obtained from epibiont ciliates on the two hosts, indicating that they were the same ciliate species. Based on phylogenetic analysis and morphological characteristics, the epibiont was presumptively identified as Z. intermedium. In winter, Z. intermedium was only found onP. pelagicus, never on A. tonsa orA. clausi. The continuous presence ofZ. intermedium on P. pelagicus during the winter suggests that it used P. pelagicus as its primary host for overwintering. PCR assays specific to Z intermedium were designed to detect this ciliate in the environment. Positive PCR results were obtained from some sediment samples, potentially implicating the existence of a benthic cyst stage as another possible overwintering strategy. In the laboratory, formation of cyst-like cells from detached zooids was observed at 5°C. In detachment-recolonization