DOCSLIB.ORG

The Communist Party of Australia and Proletarian Internationalism, 1928-1945

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Communist Party of Australia and Proletarian Internationalism, 1928-1945 The Communist Party of Australia and Proletarian Internationalism, 1928-1945 Robert Bozinovski This thesis is submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social Sciences Faculty of Arts, Education and Human Development Victoria University April 2008 ii Abstract The theory and practice of ‘proletarian internationalism’ was a vital dimension of the modus operandi of communist parties worldwide. It was a broadly encompassing concept that profoundly influenced the actions of international communism’s globally scattered adherents. Nevertheless, the historiography of the Communist Party of Australia has neglected to address sufficiently the effect exerted by proletarian internationalism on the party’s praxis. Instead, scholars have dwelt on the party’s links to the Soviet Union and have, moreover, overlooked the nuances and complexity of the Communist Party’s relationship with Moscow. It is the purpose of this thesis to redress these shortfalls. Using an extensive collection of primary and secondary sources, this thesis will consider the impact of a Marxist-Leninist conception of proletarian internationalism on the policies, tactics and strategies of the Communist Party of Australia from 1928-1945. The thesis will demonstrate that proletarian internationalism was far more than mere adherence to Moscow, obediently receiving and implementing instructions. Instead, through the lens of this concept, we can see that the Communist Party’s relationship with Moscow was flexible and nuanced and one that, in reality, often put the party at odds with the official Soviet position. In addition, we will see the extent of the influence exerted by other aspects of proletarian internationalism, such as international solidarity, the so-called national and colonial questions and the communist attitude towards war, on the Communist Party’s praxis. iii I, Robert Bozinovski, declare that the PhD thesis entitled ‘The Communist Party of Australia and Proletarian Internationalism, 1928-1945’ is no more than 100,000 words in length including quotes and exclusive of tables, figures, appendices, bibliography, references and footnotes. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work. Signature_____________________________ Date_________________________________ iv Table of Contents Abstract ii Declaration of Authenticity iii Table of Contents iv Acknowledgments v Abbreviations vi Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review 1 Chapter Two: The Ideological Foundations of Proletarian Internationalism 21 Chapter Three: Resisting the Third Period 41 Chapter Four: From the Third Period to the Popular Front 104 Chapter Five: Proletarian Internationalism, the Popular Front and War 167 Chapter Six: The People’s War and Proletarian Internationalism 225 Conclusion 249 Bibliography 256 v Acknowledgments I would like to thank my supervisor, Professor Phillip Deery, for his guidance, advice and support. I would also like to thank Dr. Marc Askew for his valuable advice and assistance during the early stages of this monumental task. I would also like to thank my friends for their encouragement and comic relief during times of frustration. I thank also the Hon. Brendan O’Connor, and my co-workers Julie, Colin, Sean and Stacey, for their encouragement, support and understanding over the past three years. To my mother Blaga, sister Belinda and her husband Mark, words cannot express my debt to your boundless support, patience and understanding; without it none of this would have been possible. vi Abbreviations AAS Anglo-American Secretariat ACTU Australasian Council of Trade Unions AIF Australian Imperial Force ALP Australian Labor Party ARU Australian Railways Union AWU Australian Workers Union CI Communist International Cominform Communist Information Bureau Comintern Communist International CC Central Committee CCP Communist Party of China CEC Central Executive Committee CP Communist Party CPA Communist Party of Australia CPGB Communist Party of Great Britain CPNZ Communist Party of New Zealand CPSA Communist Party of South Africa CPSU Communist Party of the Soviet Union CPUSA Communist Party of the United States of America EAM Greek National Liberation Front ECCI Executive Committee of the Communist International ELAS National People’s Liberation Army vii FOSU Friends of the Soviet Union ICWPA International Class War Prisoner’s Aid ILD International Labor Defence ILP Independent Labour Party IRA International Red Aid IWW Industrial Workers of the World KMT Kuomintang KPD Communist Party of Germany LAI League Against Imperialism LLL Week Lenin-Liebknecht-Luxemburg Week MAWAF Movement Against War and Fascism MMM Militant Minority Movement PCF Communist Party of France PCI Communist Party of Italy PPTUS Pan-Pacific Trade Union Secretariat Profintern Red International of Labour Unions (see also RILU) RAN Royal Australian Navy RILU Red International of Labour Unions (see also Profintern) SFIO French Socialist Party SPD German Social Democratic Party SRC Spanish Relief Committee THC Trades Hall Council TUC Trade Union Congress viii UAP United Australia Party UCP United Country Party UFAF United Front Against Fascism UWM Unemployed Workers Movement WDC Workers’ Defence Corps WWF Waterside Workers’ Federation YCL Young Communist League 1 Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review Proletarian internationalism was a central tenet underpinning communist thought. It was a broad concept which influenced the Communist Party of Australia’s (CPA) policies, strategies, propaganda and actions. For communists, it represented the unshakable unity of the proletarians of all lands against the common foe of all workers: capitalism. It epitomised solidarity in the international class war; global proletarians against global capitalists; and a mortal struggle that a Marxist reading of history predicted would result in victory for the underdog. Against an expansionistic capitalism with outposts in all countries, victory could only be conclusive if it were global. Only then could the eradication of the scourge of capitalism, the raison d’être of revolutionary socialists, become a reality. For the attainment of this goal, proletarian internationalism was indispensable. Proletarian internationalism also presented a unique and radically different perspective of the world from that offered by the mainstream national centric political doctrines. It was the diametric opposite to bourgeois ‘nationalism.’ Whereas nationalism emphasised loyalty to one’s own countrymen/women, regardless of class, proletarian internationalism underscored loyalty to class, across borders, irrespective of colour or religion. In the Australian context, this set apart the CPA from the Australian Labor Party (ALP) and the United Australia Party (UAP). The two major parties of Australian politics did not possess anything vaguely reminiscent of an internationalist worldview; this was understandable as neither had as its raison d’être the militant prosecution of the class war or the annihilation of capitalism on a global basis. With the triumph of the Bolsheviks in 1917, revolutionary socialists witnessed the emergence of a living embodiment of their ideals. Proletarians could now point to a supposedly worker run state, building a worker’s paradise. The primary aim of all class conscious proletarians was emulation of the Bolshevik example. Particularly encouraging was the seeming willingness of the new workers’ government to render assistance via the Communist International (Comintern) to those who shared its quixotic ideals. In return, it became the duty of all revolutionaries loyal to the cause to defend the USSR. It was the sole workers’ state; its destruction would be a tremendous setback to all revolutionary socialists. Refuting anti-Soviet propaganda and resisting anti-Soviet war was a central duty that fell on the shoulders of the faithful scattered around the globe. 2 These various threads all lead to the following question: what was proletarian internationalism? It must be stated from the outset that a detailed working definition of proletarian internationalism will be provided in chapter two and will serve as a constant reference point for this thesis. But generally speaking, proletarian internationalism meant a range of things to different people at different times. To communists it meant solidarity with fellow proletarians, wherever in the world their struggle was waged. It also meant defence of the land of socialism where the workers supposedly held state power. It meant affiliation to the Comintern, the global Communist Party, which in turn meant behaving in unison with the Comintern; ‘exceptionalism’ was anathema. It also meant waging struggles at home on behalf of fellow workers abroad and demanding an end to colonisation and imperialist expansion. Proletarian internationalism also entailed (in the CPA’s case) fighting for the acceptance of Australia’s neighbours and rejecting racism, bigotry, national chauvinism and the ‘White Australia’ policy. In a word, it meant fighting for class interests and socialism on a global scale, rejecting jingoism and racism along the way. The values inherent in proletarian internationalism attracted many to the CPA’s ranks; yet it was also a liability, often placing the party at uncomfortable loggerheads with mainstream opinion. To others, proletarian internationalism held
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War Communism and Bolshevik Ideals" Is Devoted to a Case I N Point: the Dispute Over the Motivation of War Communism (The Name Given T O
    TITLE : WAR COMMUNISM AND BOLSHEVIK IDEAL S AUTHOR : LARS T . LIH THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEA N RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : ' CONTRACTOR : Wellesley Colleg e PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Lars T. Li h COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 807-1 9 DATE : January 25, 199 4 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f information Act 5 U.S. C. 552, or other applicable law. The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (th e Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983) . The analysis and interpretations contained in th e report are those of the author. NCSEER NOTE This interpretive analysis of War Communism (1918-1921) may be of interest to those wh o anticipate further decline in the Russian economy and contemplate the possible purposes an d policies of a more authoritarian regime .
    [Show full text]
  • From Proletarian Internationalism to Populist
    from proletarian internationalism to populist russocentrism: thinking about ideology in the 1930s as more than just a ‘Great Retreat’ David Brandenberger (Harvard/Yale) • [email protected] The most characteristic aspect of the newly-forming ideology... is the downgrading of socialist elements within it. This doesn’t mean that socialist phraseology has disappeared or is disappearing. Not at all. The majority of all slogans still contain this socialist element, but it no longer carries its previous ideological weight, the socialist element having ceased to play a dynamic role in the new slogans.... Props from the historic past – the people, ethnicity, the motherland, the nation and patriotism – play a large role in the new ideology. –Vera Aleksandrova, 19371 The shift away from revolutionary proletarian internationalism toward russocentrism in interwar Soviet ideology has long been a source of scholarly controversy. Starting with Nicholas Timasheff in 1946, some have linked this phenomenon to nationalist sympathies within the party hierarchy,2 while others have attributed it to eroding prospects for world This article builds upon pieces published in Left History and presented at the Midwest Russian History Workshop during the past year. My eagerness to further test, refine and nuance this reading of Soviet ideological trends during the 1930s stems from the fact that two book projects underway at the present time pivot on the thesis advanced in the pages that follow. I’m very grateful to the participants of the “Imagining Russia” conference for their indulgence. 1 The last line in Russian reads: “Bol’shuiu rol’ v novoi ideologii igraiut rekvizity istoricheskogo proshlogo: narod, narodnost’, rodina, natsiia, patriotizm.” V.
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Parties Have Inherited from Lenin and Other Great Bolsheviks an Ideal-Logical Paradigm
    The Bolshevik Ideal-logical Paradi!! Communist parties have inherited from Lenin and other great bolsheviks an ideal-logical paradigm. In terms of this paradigm the bolsheviks understand themselves and the world, which they try to disqualify ideologically and to change through revolutionary activity. Apart from the ideal of a communist society, the following ideas exerted key influence on the Bolsheviks' (self)understanding: proletarian revolution; a party of (professional) revolutionaries organized in a democratic-centralist manner; dictatorship of the proletariat; the party as the representative of the objective and historical interests of the proletariat; the transition period between capitalism and communism. As Marxists the Bolsheviks faced the problem of how to explain to them­ selves and others the possibility of proletarian, socialist revolution in backward Russia. The idea of a centralized party of professional revolution­ aries did not suffice; they needed a radical revision of the Marxist vision of revolution. This revision transformed a revolutionary philosophical-social theory into a revolutionary ideal-logy. Admittedly, Marx himself was ambivalent: He'saw a real chance for the revolution and the subsequent development of a new society in developed capitalism, but from time to time he lost his patience, hoping that the revolution would soon break out even though capitalism was still i rather undeveloped. Characteristically, Bolshevik ideal-logues believed tliat Marx's goals could be achieved under radicallY changed conditions and through radically 1 2 Changed means.* One could almost say that revolution sets only those goals it cannot aChieve. Two ideas were of key import~nce for the Bolshevik ideal-logical revision of Marx's concept of revolution: the weakest link of imperialism and the permanent revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Development Strategy and Planning: the Soviet Experience
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: National Economic Planning Volume Author/Editor: Max F. Millikan, editor Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-87014-310-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/mill67-1 Conference Date: Publication Date: 1967 Chapter Title: Development Strategy and Planning: The Soviet Experience Chapter Author(s): Alexander Erlich Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c1425 Chapter pages in book: (p. 233 - 278) Development Strategy and Planning: The Soviet Experience ALEXANDER ERLICH COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY AND RUSSIAN RESEARCH CENTER, HARVARD UNIVERSITY introduction The First Soviet Five Year Plan was officially launched almost exactly thirty-five years ago. The hallmarks of the period that was ushered in therewith were rapid extension of social ownership beyond the limits of the modern urban sector, with the full-scale collectivization of agri- culture virtually completed by the mid-thirties; the establishment of an all-embracing system of centralized planning; and a remarkably high over-all rate of economic growth. The architects of the system have been insistent in postulating a three-way connection between these ele- ments. Without centralized planning, it was argued, there would be no comparable rates of growth; without extensive social ownership no effective centralized planning would be possible; and without thorough- going modernization and concentration of production in the wake of rapid economic growth, both planning and social ownership would lack a firm basis and would eventually either be subverted from within or destroyed from without.1 NoTE: The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Russian Research Center of Harvard University and of the Russian Institute of Columbia University in the preparation of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union
    CLASSROOM COUNTRY PROFILES Revolution in Russia and the Formation of the Soviet Union The Russian Revolution often refers to two events that took place in 1917. The first, known as the February Revolution, forced Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate and led to the formation of a provisional government. During the second event, commonly known as the October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution, Vla- dimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Party seized power and began seven decades of one-party rule. Some scholars and Soviet critics have argued that the second event was actually a coup by Lenin and his supporters and not a true revolution. The Russian Empire in 1914. Date confusion—The February Revolution actually In the early 1900s, cracks were beginning to appear in the tsar’s control took place in early March. Because the Russian Em- over the Russian Empire. An attempted revolution in 1905, which saw pire followed the Julian Calendar, which is 13 days mass worker strikes and peasant revolts, shook the monarchy and forced behind the Gregorian Calendar, the events are referred Tsar Nicholas II to implement political reform, including the establishment to as the February Revolution. Likewise, the October of a parliament and a new constitution. Revolution actually took place in early November. Reform temporarily quieted the unrest, but the new policies proved inef- Soviet—The word means “council” in Russian. Soviets fective and the parliament, known as the State Duma, was largely unable were workers’ councils made up of various socialist to override the Tsar’s decrees. parties at the end of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter February 2016
    Henry Handel Richardson Society of Australia Inc. Newsletter February 2016 non-members. Numbers are limited so you will need HHR Society at National Trust Heritage Festival – exciting events in to book. Payment can be made by direct deposit into our bank account or by posting your cheque to the Chiltern Society at PO Box 35, Chiltern 3683. In partnership with the National Trust the HHR Bank account details are: Henry Handel Richardson Society is preparing a program of events to take place Society of Australia, BSB 803 070, Account number in Chiltern on Saturday April 16 as part of the 77605. Please make sure your name appears on the Trust’s Heritage Festival. deposit. This festival draws visitors from across the state who Enquiries to the secretary, Janey Runci at are keen to visit National Trust properties such as [email protected], or the President, Graeme Lake View, one of HHR’s childhood homes, and it Charles at [email protected] gives us the opportunity to promote knowledge and interest in HHR and her work, as well as get together for a good time! So put this date down in your diaries now. The Society AGM will also be held on this weekend. At Lake View there will be readings of HHR’s work throughout the day. As well there will be a Society display and members available to provide information on HHR and the Society, including brochures offering Elvery Gallery, 62 Main Street, Chiltern self-guided HHR walks around Chiltern. What better way to achieve our goal than the annual Release of Sylvia Martin’s book on celebration of Richardson’s birthday with a picnic tea Aileen Palmer at Lake View, her home in Chiltern.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Culture: the End of Russian Intelligentsia
    Russian Culture Center for Democratic Culture 2012 Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri N. Shalin University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture Part of the Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Political History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Social History Commons Repository Citation Shalin, D. N. (2012). Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia. In Dmitri N. Shalin, 1-68. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture/6 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Culture by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri Shalin No group cheered louder for Soviet reform, had a bigger stake in perestroika, and suffered more in its aftermath than did the Russian intelligentsia. Today, nearly a decade after Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his plan to reform Soviet society, the mood among Russian intellectuals is decidedly gloomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    MAOISM-ITS ORIGINS, BACKGROUND, AND OUTLOOK Isaac Deutscher WHAT does Maoism stand for? What does it represent as a political idea and as a current in contemporary communism? The need to clarify these questions has become all the more urgent because Maoism is now openly competing with other communist schools of thought for inter- national recognition. Yet before entering this competition Maoism had existed as a current, and then as the dominant trend, of Chinese communism for thirty to thirty-five years. It is under its banner that the main forces of the Chinese revolution waged the most protracted civil war in modern history; and that they won their victory in 1949, making the greatest single breach in world capitalism since the October Revolu- tion, and freeing the Soviet Union from isolation. It is hardly surprising that Maoism should at last advance politically beyond its national . boundaries and claim world-wide attention to its ideas. What is surprising is that it has not done so earlier and that it has for so long remained closed within the confines of its national experience. Maoism presents in this respect a striking contrast with Leninism. The latter also existed at first as a purely Russian school of thought; but not for long. In 1915, after the collapse of the Second International, Lenin was already the central figure in the movement for the Third International, its initiator and inspirer-Bolshevism, as a faction in the Russian Social Democratic Party, was not much older then than a decade. Before that the Bolsheviks, like other Russian socialists, had lived intensely with all the problems of international Marxism, absorbed all its experience, participated in all its controversies, and felt bound to it with unbreakable ties of intellectual, moral, and political solidarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: an Analysis
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1967 Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: An Analysis Christine Deichsel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Deichsel, Christine, "Yugoslav Ideology and Its Importance to the Soviet Bloc: An Analysis" (1967). Master's Theses. 3240. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3240 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. YUGOSLAV IDEOLOGY AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO THE SOVIET BLOC: AN ANALYSIS by Christine Deichsel A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo., Michigan April 1967 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In writing this thesis I have benefited from the advice and encouragement of Professors George Klein and William A. Ritchie. My thanks go to them and the other members of my Committee, namely Professors Richard J. Richardson and Alan Isaak. Furthermore, I wish to ex­ press my appreciation to all the others at Western Michi­ gan University who have given me much needed help and encouragement. The award of an assistantship and the intellectual guidance and stimulation from the faculty of the Department of Political Science have made my graduate work both a valuable experience and a pleasure.
    [Show full text]
  • Kampen MAO ZEDONG, ZHOU ENLAI and the CHINESE COMMUNIST
    Kampen MAO ZEDONG, ZHOU ENLAI AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE CHINESE COMMUNIST LEADERSHIP MAO ZEDONG, ZHOU ENLAI Thomas Kampen MAO ZEDONG, ZHOU ENLAI AND THE CHINESE COMMUNIST LEADERSHIP NIAS AND THE EVOLUTION OF This book analyses the power struggles within the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party between 1931, when several Party leaders left Shanghai and entered the Jiangxi Soviet, and 1945, by which time Mao Zedong, Liu THE CHINESE COMMUNIST Shaoqi and Zhou Enlai had emerged as senior CCP leaders. In 1949 they established the People's Republic of China and ruled it for several decades. LEADERSHIP Based on new Chinese sources, the study challenges long-established views that Mao Zedong became CCP leader during the Long March (1934–35) and that by 1935 the CCP was independent of the Comintern in Moscow. The result is a critique not only of official Chinese historiography but also of Western (especially US) scholarship that all future histories of the CCP and power struggles in the PRC will need to take into account. “Meticulously researched history and a powerful critique of a myth that has remained central to Western and Chinese scholarship for decades. Kampen’s study of the so-called 28 Bolsheviks makes compulsory reading for anyone Thomas Kampen trying to understand Mao’s (and Zhou Enlai’s!) rise to power. A superb example of the kind of revisionist writing that today's new sources make possible, and reminder never to take anything for granted as far as our ‘common knowledge’ about the history of the Chinese Communist Party is concerned.” – Michael Schoenhals, Director, Centre for East and Southeast Asian Studies, Lund University, Sweden “Thomas Kampen has produced a work of exceptional research which, through the skillful use of recently available Chinese sources, questions the accepted wisdom about the history of the leadership of the CCP.
    [Show full text]
  • On Mao's Contradictions
    REVIEWS Rebecca E. Karl, Mao Zedong and China in the Twentieth-Century World Duke University Press: Durham, nc 2010, $21.95, paperback 216 pp, 978 0 8223 4795 8 Tariq Ali ON MAO’S CONTRADICTIONS The emergence of China as the world’s economic powerhouse has shifted the centre of the global market eastwards. The prc’s growth rates are the envy of elites everywhere, its commodities circulating even in the tiniest Andean street markets, its leaders courted by governments strong and weak. These developments have ignited endless discussion on the country and its future. The mainstream media are essentially concerned with the extent to which Beijing is catering to the economic needs of Washington, while think- tankers worry that China will sooner or later mount a systematic challenge to the political wisdom of the West. Academic debate, meanwhile, usually con- centrates on the exact nature and the mechanics of contemporary capitalism in China. The optimists of the intellect argue that its essence is determined by the ccp’s continued grip on power, seeing China’s pro-market turn as a version of the Bolsheviks’ New Economic Policy; in more delirious moments, they argue that China’s leaders will use their new economic strength to build a socialism purer than anything previously attempted, based on proper development of the productive forces and not the tin-pot communes of the past. Others, by contrast, hold that a more accurate name for the ruling party would not even require a change of initials—Communist is easily replaced with Capitalist. A third view insists that the Chinese future is simply not foreseeable; it is too soon to predict it with any certainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy Chesser's Bibliography of Australian Lesbian History
    Lucy Chesser’s Bibliography of Australian Lesbian History Did you know there are at least 45 discrete publications and a string of additional unpublished theses that deal, in a significant fashion, with Australian lesbian history? Have you written something that contributes to Australian lesbian history? It could be an article, a chapter, a thesis, or even just a few key paragraphs or pages in a work that is on something broader, but includes lesbian history. Would you like to know that other people are aware of your work and that it doesn’t get lost and your hard work overlooked? Have you read something good that is not on this list? Are you a student or researcher who would you like to quickly find work that has dealt with issues in Australian lesbian history? Would you rather spend more of your time reading such work instead of searching for it? This list is a dynamic resource that is designed to stop the great work that has and continues to be produced in Australian lesbian history from being lost, overlooked and unrecognised. It is maintained by Lucy Chesser. She should be contacted by email at [email protected] with comments, suggestions and additions to the list. Lucy Chesser’s Bibliography of Australian Lesbian History is a list of everything that Lucy is aware of that has been written that deals in some significant manner with Australian lesbian history. Lucy has not necessarily read everything on the list (one day, hopefully!) but also relies on others nominating items. No doubt Lucy has missed some things (her apologies) and she may be unaware of new or recent publications, especially those that happen overseas or where the contribution occurs within a monograph.
    [Show full text]