DOCSLIB.ORG

Connecticut Officeholders, 1787–1788

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Connecticut Officeholders, 1787–1788 GOVERNOR COMPTROLLER Samuel Huntington James Wadsworth LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR SeCretary Of State Oliver WolCott, Sr. George Wyllys TREASURER John LawrenCe SUPERIOR COURT RiChard Law (Chief Judge), Eliphalet Dyer, Oliver Ellsworth, William Pitkin, Roger Sherman MEMBERS OF CONGRESS (May—OCtober 1787): Joseph Platt Cooke, James Hillhouse, William Samuel Johnson, Stephen Mix Mitchell, Jonathan Sturges, John Treadwell, Erastus WolCott; (from OCtober 1787): John Chester, Joseph Platt Cooke, Pierpont Edwards, Benjamin Huntington, Stephen Mix Mitchell, John Treadwell, Jeremiah Wadsworth DELEGATES TO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION Oliver Ellsworth, William Samuel Johnson, Roger Sherman, Erastus WolCott (resigned) COUNCIL Samuel Huntington, Governor Oliver WolCott, Sr., Lieutenant Governor William Samuel Johnson Stephen Mix Mitchell, Clerk Joseph Spencer William Hillhouse William Williams Erastus WolCott Andrew Adams John Treadwell Benjamin Huntington Jonathan Sturges Joseph Platt Cooke James Wadsworth HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OCtober—November 1787 HARTFORD COUNTY East Hartford Hartford Jonathan Wells Jeremiah Wadsworth Ashbel Pitkin Jonathan Bull East Windsor Berlin Lemuel Stoughton Gad Stanley Roswell Grant Selah Hart Enfield Bristol Daniel Perkins Zebulon Peck Ephraim Pease [342 ] Farmington North Haven Hezekiah Wadsworth Daniel Bassett James Lusk Wallingford Glastonbury Street Hall Joseph Mosely Samuel Whiting John Wells Waterbury Granby Joseph Hopkins Hezekiah HolComb John Welton Southington Woodbridge John Curtiss Thomas Darling Asa Barns David FrenCh Suffield Abraham Granger NEW LONDON COUNTY Amos Granger New London Amasa Learned Simsbury Noah Phelps John Deshon Jonathan Pettibone Norwich Wethersfield Elijah Backus John Chester, Speaker Jared Tracy Joseph Bulkley Bozrah Windsor Isaac Huntington Henry Allyn ColChester Solomon Griswold John Watrous Joseph Isham NEW HAVEN COUNTY Franklin New Haven Joseph Barker Pierpont Edwards Groton Charles ChaunCey Thomas N. Niles Branford Edward Stephen Billings Russell Timothy Hoadley Lisbon John Perkins Cheshire Samuel Beach Lyme Reuben Atwater Mansfield Parsons Ezra Selden Derby John Wooster Montville Samuel Hull John G. Hillhouse Durham Preston Simeon Parsons Oliver Crary Benjamin PiCket John Tyler East Haven Stonington Charles Phelps Elisha Samuel Davenport Denison Guilford John Burgis FAIRFIELD COUNTY John Eliott Fairfield Hamden Andrew Rowland John Hubbard Elijah Abel Milford Danbury Stephen Gunn Eli Mygatt Gideon BuCkingham Daniel Taylor Greenwich Pomfret John Mead Josiah Sabin Amos Mead Ebenezer Kingsbury New Fairfield Thompson Nehemiah Beardsley Jonathan NiChols James Potter Voluntown Newtown John Wiley John Beach Benjamin Gallop Abijah Curtiss WoodstoCk Norwalk Stephen Paine Samuel C. Silliman Charles Child Hezekiah Rogers LITCHFIELD COUNTY Redding Litchfield William Heron Ebenezer Marsh Lemuel Sanford Jedidiah Strong, Clerk Ridgefield Bethlem [Bethlehem] Philip Burr Bradley David Ambler David Olmsted Canaan Stamford Charles Burrall James Davenport, Nathan Hale Ass’t. Clerk Charles Weed Cornwall Stratford Hezekiah Gold Joseph Walker John Cornwell Abraham Brinsmade Goshen Daniel Miles WINDHAM COUNTY Adino Hale Windham Hartland Zephaniah Swift Isaac Burnham Hezekiah Ripley John Wilder Ashford Harwinton William Walker Abner Wilson Isaac Perkins Josiah Phelps Brooklyn Kent Joseph Baker Nathan Eliott Canterbury New Hartford Moses Cleaveland Seth Smith Benjamin Bacon John Henderson Hampton New Milford James Stedman Sherman Boardman Killingly Samuel Canfield Sampson Howe Norfolk ZadoCk Spalding Asahel Humphrey Lebanon Hosea Humphrey Daniel Tilden Salisbury Ephraim Carpenter Lemuel Wheeler Mansfield Hezekiah Fitch Constant Southworth Sharon Nathaniel Atwood Simeon Smith Plainfield Jonathan Gillett Ephraim Wheeler Southbury Anthony Bradford Benjamin Hinman Torrington Killingworth Amos Willson Hezekiah Lane Shubael Griswold George Eliot Warren Saybrook Nathaniel Swift William Hart Washington William Mitchell John Whittlesey TOLLAND COUNTY Nathan HiCkox Tolland Watertown Samuel Chapman Thomas Fenn Bolton Daniel Potter Samuel Carver WinChester David Taylor Benjamin BenediCt Coventry Woodbury Jeremiah Ripley Daniel Sherman Daniel White Ellington Matthew Hyde MIDDLESEX COUNTY Hebron Middletown Daniel Ingham George Phillips Sylvester Gilbert Elijah Hubbard Somers Reuben Sikes Chatham [East Hampton] Joshua Pomeroy John Penfield Stafford James Bill John Phelps East Haddam Isaac Foot Eliphalet Holmes Union Israel SpenCer John Sessions Haddam Willington David Brainerd Seth CroCker Edward Selden Elisha Johnson Cite as: The DoCumentary History of the RatifiCation of the Constitution Digital Edition, ed. John P. Kaminski, Gaspare J. Saladino, RiChard Leffler, Charles H. SChoenleber and Margaret A. Hogan. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2009. CanoniC URL: http://rotunda.upress.virginia.edu/founders/RNCN-02-03-02-0004-0005 [acCessed 15 DeC 2010] Original sourCe: RatifiCation by the States, Volume III: Delaware, New Jersey, Georgia, and ConneCtiCut .
Recommended publications
  • Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York

    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York

    Introduction to the Ratification of the Constitution in New York During the decade preceding the War for Independence, New York was divided into two large provincial factions—the Delanceys and the Livingstons. When independence neared, the Delanceys were in power and they remained loyal to the king. The opposition to British imperial policy consisted of three groups—the radical elements led by New York City mechanics who advocated independence from Great Britain, a very conservative group that wanted reconciliation, and another conservative group that wanted to delay independence but would not give up key colonial rights. Because conservatives controlled the third Provincial Congress, that body gave no instructions on the question of independence to New York’s delegates to the Second Continental Congress meeting in Philadelphia. Not being instructed, the New York delegation, standing alone, did not vote on independence on 2 July 1776. Earlier, in response to the Continental Congress’ resolution of 15 May 1776, the third Provincial Congress had called on the electors in the different counties to elect a fourth provincial congress which might draft a constitution creating a state government. The election took place and the new Provincial Congress on 9 July resolved unanimously to join the other colonies in declaring independence. The next day it renamed itself the Provincial Convention. On 1 August the Convention appointed a committee of thirteen to draft a state constitution and to report by 26 August. The committee did not report until 12 March 1777. After almost six weeks of debate, the Convention on 20 April voted “in the name and by the authority of the good people of this State” to adopt the constitution.
  • 1 the Story of the Faulkner Murals by Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. the Story Of

    1 the Story of the Faulkner Murals by Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. the Story Of

    The Story of the Faulkner Murals By Lester S. Gorelic, Ph.D. The story of the Faulkner murals in the Rotunda begins on October 23, 1933. On this date, the chief architect of the National Archives, John Russell Pope, recommended the approval of a two- year competing United States Government contract to hire a noted American muralist, Barry Faulkner, to paint a mural for the Exhibit Hall in the planned National Archives Building.1 The recommendation initiated a three-year project that produced two murals, now viewed and admired by more than a million people annually who make the pilgrimage to the National Archives in Washington, DC, to view two of the Charters of Freedom documents they commemorate: the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America. The two-year contract provided $36,000 in costs plus $6,000 for incidental expenses.* The contract ended one year before the projected date for completion of the Archives Building’s construction, providing Faulkner with an additional year to complete the project. The contract’s only guidance of an artistic nature specified that “The work shall be in character with and appropriate to the particular design of this building.” Pope served as the contract supervisor. Louis Simon, the supervising architect for the Treasury Department, was brought in as the government representative. All work on the murals needed approval by both architects. Also, The United States Commission of Fine Arts served in an advisory capacity to the project and provided input critical to the final composition. The contract team had expertise in art, architecture, painting, and sculpture.
  • H. Doc. 108-222

    H. Doc. 108-222

    FOURTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1795, TO MARCH 3, 1797 FIRST SESSION—December 7, 1795, to June 1, 1796 SECOND SESSION—December 5, 1796, to March 3, 1797 SPECIAL SESSION OF THE SENATE—June 8, 1795, to June 26, 1795 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—JOHN ADAMS, of Massachusetts PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—HENRY TAZEWELL, 1 of Virginia; SAMUEL LIVERMORE, 2 of New Hampshire; WILLIAM BINGHAM, 3 of Pennsylvania SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—SAMUEL A. OTIS, of Massachusetts DOORKEEPER OF THE SENATE—JAMES MATHERS, of New York SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—JONATHAN DAYTON, 4 of New Jersey CLERK OF THE HOUSE—JOHN BECKLEY, 5 of Virginia SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—JOSEPH WHEATON, of Rhode Island DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS CLAXTON CONNECTICUT GEORGIA Richard Potts 17 18 SENATORS SENATORS John Eager Howard Oliver Ellsworth 6 James Gunn REPRESENTATIVES James Hillhouse 7 James Jackson 14 8 Jonathan Trumbull George Walton 15 Gabriel Christie 9 Uriah Tracy Josiah Tattnall 16 Jeremiah Crabb 19 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE 20 REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE William Craik Joshua Coit 21 Abraham Baldwin Gabriel Duvall Chauncey Goodrich Richard Sprigg, Jr. 22 Roger Griswold John Milledge George Dent James Hillhouse 10 James Davenport 11 KENTUCKY William Hindman Nathaniel Smith SENATORS Samuel Smith Zephaniah Swift John Brown Thomas Sprigg 12 Uriah Tracy Humphrey Marshall William Vans Murray Samuel Whittlesey Dana 13 REPRESENTATIVES DELAWARE Christopher Greenup MASSACHUSETTS SENATORS Alexander D. Orr John Vining SENATORS Henry Latimer MARYLAND Caleb Strong 23 REPRESENTATIVE AT LARGE SENATORS Theodore Sedgwick 24 John Patten John Henry George Cabot 25 1 Elected December 7, 1795.
  • War, Murder, and a “Monster of a Man” in Revolutionary New England

    War, Murder, and a “Monster of a Man” in Revolutionary New England

    THE ANXIOUS ATLANTIC: WAR, MURDER, AND A “MONSTER OF A MAN” IN REVOLUTIONARY NEW ENGLAND A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by David W. Thomas December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Travis Glasson, Advisory Chair, Department of History Mónica Ricketts, Department of History Jessica Roney, Department of History David Waldstreicher, External Member, The Graduate Center, CUNY Richard Bell, External Member, University of Maryland ii © Copyright 2018 by David W. Thomas All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT On December 11, 1782 in Wethersfield, Connecticut, a fifty-two year old English immigrant named William Beadle murdered his wife and four children and took his own life. Beadle’s erstwhile friends were aghast. William was no drunk. He was not abusive, foul-tempered, or manifestly unstable. Since arriving in 1772, Beadle had been a respected merchant in Wethersfield good society. Newspapers, pamphlets, and sermons carried the story up and down the coast. Writers quoted from a packet of letters Beadle left at the scene. Those letters disclosed Beadle’s secret allegiance to deism and the fact that the War for Independence had ruined Beadle financially, in his mind because he had acted like a patriot not a profiteer. Authors were especially unnerved with Beadle’s mysterious past. In a widely published pamphlet, Stephen Mix Mitchell, Wethersfield luminary and Beadle’s one-time closest friend, sought answers in Beadle’s youth only to admit that in ten years he had learned almost nothing about the man print dubbed a “monster.” This macabre story of family murder, and the fretful writing that carried the tale up and down the coast, is the heart of my dissertation.
  • The President Pro Tempore of the Senate: History and Authority of the Office

    The President Pro Tempore of the Senate: History and Authority of the Office

    Order Code RL30960 The President Pro Tempore of the Senate: History and Authority of the Office Updated April 2, 2008 Christopher M. Davis Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division The President Pro Tempore of the Senate History and Authority of the Office Summary The U.S. Constitution establishes the office of the President pro tempore of the Senate to preside over the Senate in the Vice President’s absence. Since 1947, the President pro tempore has stood third in line to succeed to the presidency, after the Vice President and the Speaker of the House. Although the President pro tempore’s powers are limited and not comparable to those of the Speaker of the House, as the chamber’s presiding officer, he is authorized to perform certain duties. For example, he may decide points of order (subject to appeal) and enforce decorum in the Senate chamber and galleries. Early in the nation’s history, some Presidents pro tempore appointed Senators to standing committees. While they no longer do so, election to the office is considered one of the highest honors bestowed by the Senate, and Presidents pro tempore are traditionally accorded a somewhat larger salary and allowances for staff. Eighty-seven different Senators have served as President pro tempore. Sixty- one served prior to 1900, when Vice Presidents routinely presided over the chamber and Presidents pro tempore were elected to serve only for limited periods when the Vice President was absent or ill, or the office was vacated. Frequently, several different Presidents pro tempore were chosen in a single congressional session, “on the basis of their personal characteristics, popularity, and reliability.” (See Robert C.
  • Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate Since 1789

    Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate Since 1789

    PRO TEM Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 4 OIL Presidents Pro Tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 With a preface by Senator Robert C. Byrd, President pro tempore Prepared by the Senate Historical Office under the direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 110th Congress, 2d Session Senate Publication 110-18 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 2008 COPYRIGHTED MATERIALS Many of the photographs and images in this volume are protected by copyright. Those have been used here with the consent of their respective owners. No republication of copyrighted material may be made without permission in writing from the copyright holder. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data United States. Congress. Senate. Pro tern : presidents pro tempore of the United States Senate since 1789 / prepared by the Senate Historical Office ; under the direction of Nancy Erickson, Secretary of the Senate. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-0-16-079984-6 1. United States. Congress. Senate--Presiding officers. 2. United States. Congress. Senate--History. I. Erickson, Nancy. II. United States. Congress. Senate. Historical Office. III. Title. JK1226.U55 2008 328.73092'2--dc22 2008004722 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-079984-6 Table of Contents Foreword ................... ................... 3 20. Samuel Smith (MD), 1805-1807, 1808, 1828, 1829-1831 21. John Milledge (GA), 1809 ..................
  • James SHARPLES II Sitters

    James SHARPLES II Sitters

    Neil Jeffares, Dictionary of pastellists before 1800 Online edition SHARPLES, James Reference Library file, attr.; olim attr. Ellen Lancashire 1752 – New York 1811 Sharples, olim identified as of Mrs George Part II: Sitters L–Z; other items Washington Lafayette; damaged by damp and excessively restored J.675.405 George Washington LAFAYETTE (1779– J.675.422 ~cop. Felix Sharples (Van Bibber 1849), soldier, pstl/ppr, 23.5x18.4, 1797–99 Sanders, Gloucester Court House, Virginai) (Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association W-2019. J.675.423 General Benjamin LINCOLN (1733– Acqu. 1955). Exh.: Mount Vernon 1974 1810), pstl, 23x18 (Bernard & S. Dean Levy, J.675.406 M. [George Washington] de Inv., New York, 1977). Lit.: Antiques, LAFAYETTE, pstl/ppr, 22.9x17.7, 1795–97 .VIII.1977, p. 168 repr. (Bristol City Art Gallery inv. K1021. Acqu. J.675.424 Sir Robert LISTON (1742–1836), 1931). Lit.: Gidley 1974 diplomat; & pendant: J.675.425 spouse, née J.675.407 John LANGDON (1741–1819), pstl/ppr, Henrietta Marchant (1752–1828), pstl, 24.1x19, c.1790–1800 (Smith College, 22.9x17.7 (Bristol City Art Gallery). Lit.: Museum of Art, 1975:52-3. Legs Alice Gidley 1974 Rutherford Erving) J.675.426 Samuel LIVERMORE (1732–1803) J.675.427 J.675.408 ~version, 23x18 (Philadelphia, INHP, J.675.415 Mr LECHER, m/u ~version, 23x18 (Philadelphia, INHP, INDE 11910. Felix Sharples 1811; Winder; J.675.416 ~cop. Ellen Sharples, crayons (3), 1804 INDE 11935. Felix Sharples 1811; Winder; Harrison; acqu. 1876). Lit.: Diethorn 2001, p. J.675.417 LEFEVRE, olim ??Cipriano Ribeiro Freire Harrison; acqu. 1876).
  • H. Doc. 108-222

    H. Doc. 108-222

    34 Biographical Directory DELEGATES IN THE CONTINENTAL CONGRESS CONNECTICUT Dates of Attendance Andrew Adams............................ 1778 Benjamin Huntington................ 1780, Joseph Spencer ........................... 1779 Joseph P. Cooke ............... 1784–1785, 1782–1783, 1788 Jonathan Sturges........................ 1786 1787–1788 Samuel Huntington ................... 1776, James Wadsworth....................... 1784 Silas Deane ....................... 1774–1776 1778–1781, 1783 Jeremiah Wadsworth.................. 1788 Eliphalet Dyer.................. 1774–1779, William S. Johnson........... 1785–1787 William Williams .............. 1776–1777 1782–1783 Richard Law............ 1777, 1781–1782 Oliver Wolcott .................. 1776–1778, Pierpont Edwards ....................... 1788 Stephen M. Mitchell ......... 1785–1788 1780–1783 Oliver Ellsworth................ 1778–1783 Jesse Root.......................... 1778–1782 Titus Hosmer .............................. 1778 Roger Sherman ....... 1774–1781, 1784 Delegates Who Did Not Attend and Dates of Election John Canfield .............................. 1786 William Hillhouse............. 1783, 1785 Joseph Trumbull......................... 1774 Charles C. Chandler................... 1784 William Pitkin............................. 1784 Erastus Wolcott ...... 1774, 1787, 1788 John Chester..................... 1787, 1788 Jedediah Strong...... 1782, 1783, 1784 James Hillhouse ............... 1786, 1788 John Treadwell ....... 1784, 1785, 1787 DELAWARE Dates of Attendance Gunning Bedford,
  • Morristown Encampment 1779-80—A Chronology

    Morristown Encampment 1779-80—A Chronology

    MORRISTOWN ENCAMPMENT 1779-80—A CHRONOLOGY The following represents dates, events and commentary that provide highlights of the story of the Morristown encampment of 1779-1780. Thursday, November 4 Time to find a winter campsite. ―The weather begins to get cold and puts us in mind of winter quarters…It therefore becoms [sic] necessary to look out for a proper place to hut the army in.‖ Quartermaster General Nathanael Greene instructing a deputy in New Jersey, James Abeel, to find places that would support a winter encampment of the Continental Army directly under the command of General George Washington General Greene will arrive in Morristown on Saturday, November 20, to personally oversee the search. Tuesday, November 30 General Washington makes the choice—Jockey Hollow. Will arrive at Mrs. Ford’s house tomorrow. ―From a consideration of all circumstances, I am led to decide upon the position back of Mr. Kemble’s,… [the property behind that of the Kemble estate, known as Jockey Hollow] I shall be at Morristown tomorrow and shall be obliged your ordering me a late dinner. I understand my quarters are to be at Mrs. Fords. If I am mistaken, be pleased to send me a person to set me right.‖ General Washington in a letter to General Nathanael Greene of his decision of where to locate his Main Army’s winter encampment Friday, December 10 Is Mrs. Ford not happy about hosting General Washington? ― … I am happy to think that my Letter to the Director General of the Hospital, should have been anyways instrumental in preventing the Repetition of former Impositions upon Morris Town: & could have wished that General Washington had been as well accommodated without taking up his Quarters at Mrs.
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
  • MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN Turnu I

    MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN Turnu I

    [Vol.109 THE MIDNIGHT JUDGES KATHRYN TuRNu I "The Federalists have retired into the judiciary as a strong- hold . and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased." ' This bitter lament of Thomas Jefferson after he had succeeded to the Presidency referred to the final legacy bequeathed him by the Federalist party. Passed during the closing weeks of the Adams administration, the Judiciary Act of 1801 2 pro- vided the Chief Executive with an opportunity to fill new judicial offices carrying tenure for life before his authority ended on March 4, 1801. Because of the last-minute rush in accomplishing this purpose, those men then appointed have since been known by the familiar generic designation, "the midnight judges." This flight of Federalists into the sanctuary of an expanded federal judiciary was, of course, viewed by the Republicans as the last of many partisan outrages, and was to furnish the focus for Republican retaliation once the Jeffersonian Congress convened in the fall of 1801. That the Judiciary Act of 1801 was repealed and the new judges deprived of their new offices in the first of the party battles of the Jeffersonian period is well known. However, the circumstances surrounding the appointment of "the midnight judges" have never been recounted, and even the names of those appointed have vanished from studies of the period. It is the purpose of this Article to provide some further information about the final event of the Federalist decade. A cardinal feature of the Judiciary Act of 1801 was a reform long advocated-the reorganization of the circuit courts.' Under the Judiciary Act of 1789, the judicial districts of the United States had been grouped into three circuits-Eastern, Middle, and Southern-in which circuit court was held by two justices of the Supreme Court (after 1793, by one justice) ' and the district judge of the district in which the court was sitting.5 The Act of 1801 grouped the districts t Assistant Professor of History, Wellesley College.
  • John Trumbull VISUALIZING AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE

    John Trumbull VISUALIZING AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE

    vinyl output at 100% wall color = BM HC-30 philadelphia cream vinyl color = Oracal dark blue 050 John Trumbull VISUALIZING AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE The Revolutionary War (1775–1783) was seen through the eyes of a small number of artists who had served in the American army. Colonel John Trumbull, a Connecticut native, commemorated our young nation’s struggle for independence in a series of heroic vignettes. As the artist explained to Thomas Jeerson, his paintings would “diuse the knowledge and preserve the memory of the noblest series of actions which have ever dignied the history of man.” Provocative and almost mythic as dramatic snapshots, Trumbull’s paintings represented our history in visual terms. His work set the stage for later generations of artists to reinterpret the Revolutionary War and enhance the iconography of American independence. 36.5” from base of wall approx 75” 47” wide 30” John Trumbull (1 of 5): 26”w x 38”h intro panel background to match wall color = BM HC-156/van duesen blue; type color = PMS Warm Gray 2 THE WADSWORTH–TRUMBULL CONNECTION AND THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION One of New England’s wealthiest Patriots, Colonel Jeremiah Wadsworth was a key figure in the Revolutionary War. Wadsworth hosted George Washington in his home, which stood on this very spot on Main Street, on multiple occasions between 1775 and 1789. As Commissary General to the Continental Army and later a political leader, Wadsworth used his influence to help contribute to the establishment of our young nation. His only son, Daniel, was a groundbreaking patron of the arts and created the Wadsworth Atheneum — on the lot where his father’s house once stood — in 1842.