DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Did What? Engineers Vs Mathematicians Title Page America Vs Europe Ideas Vs Implementations Babbage Lovelace Turing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Who did what? Engineers vs Mathematicians Title Page America vs Europe Ideas vs Implementations Babbage Lovelace Turing Flowers Atanasoff Berry Zuse Chandler Broadhurst Mauchley & Von Neumann Wilkes Eckert Williams Kilburn SlideSlide 1 1 SlideSlide 2 2 A decade of real progress What remained to be done? A number of different pioneers had during the 1930s and 40s Memory! begun to make significant progress in developing automatic calculators (computers). Thanks (almost entirely) to A.M. Turing there was a complete theoretical understanding of the elements necessary to produce a Atanasoff had pioneered the use of electronics in calculation stored program computer – or Universal Turing Machine. Zuse had mad a number of theoretical breakthroughs Not for the first time, ideas had outstripped technology. Eckert and Mauchley (with JvN) had produced ENIAC and No-one had, by the end of the war, developed a practical store or produced the EDVAC report – spreading the word memory. Newman and Flowers had developed the Colossus It should be noted that not too many people were even working on the problem. SlideSlide 3 3 SlideSlide 4 4 The players Controversy USA: Eckert, Mauchley & von Neumann – EDVAC Fall out over the EDVAC report UK: Maurice Wilkes – EDSAC Takeover of the SSEM project by Williams (Kilburn) UK: Newman – SSEM (what was the role of Colossus?) Discord on the ACE project and the departure of Turing UK: Turing - ACE EDSAC alone was harmonious We will concentrate for a little while on the SSEM – the winner! SlideSlide 5 5 SlideSlide 6 6 1 Newman & technology transfer: Secret Technology Transfer? the claim Donald Michie : Cryptanalyst An enormous amount was transferred in an extremely seminal way to the post war developments of computers in Britain. It wasn’t appreciated that the transference was taking place and people say at Manchester who listened to Newman’s early post war lectures on the possibilities of computing and on computer design were quite unaware that this wa s based on an earlier period of systematic war work but as to the transmission, this transmission was very real and on quite a large scale .... Newman set about quite deliberately and consciously for a period of years to see that what had been learnt was enabled to be transplanted and should flourish in the environment in Manchester over which he had very considerable influence as a very much respected senior Professor of Mathematics and it was he who got Turing to go to Manchester which was a qualified success SlideSlide 7 7 67 seconds SlideSlide 8 8 Post War: Royal Society Grant Turing Post War: NPL With Patrick Blackett’s help Newman obtained a substantial Royal Society Grant: COUNCIL MINUTES UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER July 1946 - May 1952 Extracts concerning support for the Calculating/Computing Machine Laboratory 12th, JULY, 1946 The Vice-Chancellor stated: 1945 Ace Report Move to NPL 1. That Professor Newman had been informed through the Royal Society that Decision taken to outsource ACE the Treasury had decided to make a capital grant of £20,000 to be spread over the five Secondment •Tommy Flowers & Dollis Hill years from October 1st, 1946, and an annual grant of £3,000 for the same •Gentleman’s agreement •TRE Williams (& Kilburn) Huskey & the Pilot Model •Cambridge Wilkes Departure to Manchester SlideSlide 9 9 SlideSlide 10 10 ACE: A general purpose machine. The ACE project Turing suggested the following ten task s to illustrate the scope of his proposed machine: announced 1. The construction of range tables 2. To find the potential distribution outside a charged conducting tube 3. Undertake the solution of simultaneous liner equations 4. Calculate the radiation from the open end of a rectangular wave guide 5. Perform matrix multiplication where the terms are polynomials 6. Calculate response to signal for a given circuit The IEEE Computer Society timeline 7. Not possible to integrate the area under a curve (due to of computer history, completely input restrictions). 8. Count the number of butchers due to be demobilised excludes mention of British (working from Army records) developments and of Alan Turing 9. Find the solution for a simple jig saw problem 10. From a given Chess position, to calculate all the winning positions for three moves on either side. SlideSlide 11 11 SlideSlide 12 12 2 The Baby Announced A Bletchley contribution to the SSEM ? (1) “Meanwhile, Freddie Williams and Tom Kilburn had arrived at the Electrical Engineering department and they got their different design for a CRT store to work within a year. So Newman abandoned his plan to build his own computer and waited for the outcome of Williams' and Kilburn's attempts to build one. In practice, he had relatively little influence on the design and building of the Baby and its evolution to the Manchester Mark 1, but he did have discussions with the team and acted as consultant for the potential uses of computers.... Even Newman's grant was not required, as the CRT store research and the building of the Baby were funded in effect by TRE.” Brian Napper SlideSlide 13 13 SlideSlide 14 14 A Bletchley contribution to the SSEM ?(2) A Bletchley contribution to the SSEM ?(3) Now let’s be clear before we go any further, that neither Tom Kilburn nor I knew the first thing about computers when we arrived in About the middle [of 1946]...I remember Newman Manchester University. We knew that ... we’d had enough explained to giving us a few lectures in which he outlined the us to understand what the problem of storage was and what we wan ted to store, and that we’d achieved. So the point now had been reached where organisation of a computer. we’d got to find out about computers. Now we were very fortunate in Williams 1972 this respect because we had in the University here, Professor Newman and Mr Turing, who were both very keen on computers and indeed Professor Newman and Mr. A.M. Turing ... knew a lot Newman had already got a grant from the Royal Society to build a about computers and substantially nothing about computer but had not in fact yet embarked on the problem of building it, nor indeed was Newman, who was a mathematician, the right sort of electronics. They took us by the hand and explained person to build the computer. So it was a very fruitful opportunity for how numbers could live in houses with addresses and collaboration between the Maths Department and the Electrical how if they did they could be kept track of during a Engineering Department. And Newman explained the whole business of how a computer works to us, took him, I should think, all of half an hour. calculation..” So we went away and decided to build one Williams, 1975 68 seconds SlideSlide 15 15 SlideSlide 16 16 A Bletchley contribution to the SSEM ?(4) Some of Turing’s EVANS I suppose I’m wondering really whether Turing, when he came, brought anything of significance with him Babies which helped the development of the Manchester work in its next level of advance? The Bombe 1939 The Pilot ACE 1950 KILBURN No, I’m sure that… that is not so.... ....could I add at that point that the mathematics group, I think they would agree, contributed very little [to the design] The Bendix 1956 The Colossus 1943 The Baby 1948 23 seconds SlideSlide 17 17 SlideSlide 18 18 3 Alan Turing 1912-54 SlideSlide 19 19 4.
Recommended publications
  • Hereby the Screen Stands in For, and Thereby Occludes, the Deeper Workings of the Computer Itself

    Hereby the Screen Stands in For, and Thereby Occludes, the Deeper Workings of the Computer Itself

    John Warnock and an IDI graphical display unit, University of Utah, 1968. Courtesy Salt Lake City Deseret News . 24 doi:10.1162/GREY_a_00233 Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/GREY_a_00233 by guest on 27 September 2021 The Random-Access Image: Memory and the History of the Computer Screen JACOB GABOURY A memory is a means for displacing in time various events which depend upon the same information. —J. Presper Eckert Jr. 1 When we speak of graphics, we think of images. Be it the windowed interface of a personal computer, the tactile swipe of icons across a mobile device, or the surreal effects of computer-enhanced film and video games—all are graphics. Understandably, then, computer graphics are most often understood as the images displayed on a computer screen. This pairing of the image and the screen is so natural that we rarely theorize the screen as a medium itself, one with a heterogeneous history that develops in parallel with other visual and computa - tional forms. 2 What then, of the screen? To be sure, the computer screen follows in the tradition of the visual frame that delimits, contains, and produces the image. 3 It is also the skin of the interface that allows us to engage with, augment, and relate to technical things. 4 But the computer screen was also a cathode ray tube (CRT) phosphorescing in response to an electron beam, modified by a grid of randomly accessible memory that stores, maps, and transforms thousands of bits in real time. The screen is not simply an enduring technique or evocative metaphor; it is a hardware object whose transformations have shaped the ma - terial conditions of our visual culture.
  • Social Construction and the British Computer Industry in the Post-World War II Period

    Social Construction and the British Computer Industry in the Post-World War II Period

    The rhetoric of Americanisation: Social construction and the British computer industry in the Post-World War II period By Robert James Kirkwood Reid Submitted to the University of Glasgow for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economic History Department of Economic and Social History September 2007 1 Abstract This research seeks to understand the process of technological development in the UK and the specific role of a ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’ in that process. The concept of a ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’ will be developed throughout the thesis through a study into the computer industry in the UK in the post-war period . Specifically, the thesis discusses the threat of America, or how actors in the network of innovation within the British computer industry perceived it as a threat and the effect that this perception had on actors operating in the networks of construction in the British computer industry. However, the reaction to this threat was not a simple one. Rather this story is marked by sectional interests and technopolitical machination attempting to capture this rhetoric of ‘threat’ and ‘falling behind’. In this thesis the concept of ‘threat’ and ‘falling behind’, or more simply the ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’, will be explored in detail and the effect this had on the development of the British computer industry. What form did the process of capture and modification by sectional interests within government and industry take and what impact did this have on the British computer industry? In answering these questions, the thesis will first develop a concept of a British culture of computing which acts as the surface of emergence for various ideologies of innovation within the social networks that made up the computer industry in the UK.
  • ATLAS@50 Then and Now

    ATLAS@50 Then and Now

    ATLAS@50 Then and now Science & Technology Facilities Council The origins of Atlas In the years following the Second World War, there was huge interest in nuclear physics technologies both for civilian nuclear energy research and for military nuclear weapons. These technologies required ever-increasing amounts of computer power to analyse data and, more importantly, to perform simulations far more safely than would be possible in a laboratory. By 1958, 75% of Britain’s R&D computer power was provided by the Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) at Aldermaston (using an American IBM 704), Risley, Winfrith and Harwell (each using a British Ferranti Mercury). These were however what we would now call The advisory panel for the super-computer single-user systems, capable of running only included Freddy Williams (a pioneer in radar and Foreword one program at a time, so were essentially very computer technology) from Victoria University large desktop calculators. Indeed, the name of Manchester, Maurice Wilkes (designer of It is now known as Rutherford Appleton Laboratory buildings R26 and R27, but over “computer” referred to the human operator; EDSAC, the Electronic Delay Storage Automatic its 50+ year history, the Atlas Computer Laboratory in the parish of Chilton has been the machinery itself was known as an Calculator) from Cambridge, Albert Uttley of the “automatic calculating machine.” RRE (Royal Radar Establishment), and Ted Cooke- part of many seminal moments in computing history. Yarborough (designer of the Dekatron and CADET British manufacturers of automatic calculating computers) from AERE Harwell; Christopher Over its 50+ year history it has also housed It was cleaned and restored as far as we could, machines were doing well until IBM announced Strachey (a pioneer in programming language many mainframe and super-computers including and took pride of place at an event held to that their first transistorised computer was to design) was in charge of design.
  • The Manchester University "Baby" Computer and Its Derivatives, 1948 – 1951”

    The Manchester University "Baby" Computer and Its Derivatives, 1948 – 1951”

    Expert Report on Proposed Milestone “The Manchester University "Baby" Computer and its Derivatives, 1948 – 1951” Thomas Haigh. University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee & Siegen University March 10, 2021 Version of citation being responded to: The Manchester University "Baby" Computer and its Derivatives, 1948 - 1951 At this site on 21 June 1948 the “Baby” became the first computer to execute a program stored in addressable read-write electronic memory. “Baby” validated the widely used Williams- Kilburn Tube random-access memories and led to the 1949 Manchester Mark I which pioneered index registers. In February 1951, Ferranti Ltd's commercial Mark I became the first electronic computer marketed as a standard product ever delivered to a customer. 1: Evaluation of Citation The final wording is the result of several rounds of back and forth exchange of proposed drafts with the proposers, mediated by Brian Berg. During this process the citation text became, from my viewpoint at least, far more precise and historically reliable. The current version identifies several distinct contributions made by three related machines: the 1948 “Baby” (known officially as the Small Scale Experimental Machine or SSEM), a minimal prototype computer which ran test programs to prove the viability of the Manchester Mark 1, a full‐scale computer completed in 1949 that was fully designed and approved only after the success of the “Baby” and in turn served as a prototype of the Ferranti Mark 1, a commercial refinement of the Manchester Mark 1 of which I believe 9 copies were sold. The 1951 date refers to the delivery of the first of these, to Manchester University as a replacement for its home‐built Mark 1.
  • ASAP 2020 Opinion

    ASAP 2020 Opinion

    Message from the Conference Chairs ASAP 2020 We welcome you to the 31st IEEE International Conference on Application-specific Systems, Architectures and Processors (ASAP 2020). This year’s event was supposed to take place in Manchester, United Kingdom, a major city in the northwest of England with a rich industrial heritage. Manchester has transformed the modern world through a boom in textile manufacturing during the industrial revolution in Victorian England. In the 1880s, 80% of the world cotton production went through Manchester for trade and manufacturing, making Manchester the first industrialized city in the world. To master the enormous logistics, the 58 km Manchester Ship Canal connected Manchester with the Irish Sea in 1894, and the world’s first steam-powered, inter-urban railway for transporting both passengers and goods was completed between Manchester and Liverpool in 1830. Its Manchester terminus is now part of the Science and Industry Museum where we planed the ASAP 2020 banquet. ASAP 2020 is hosted by the Department of Computer Science at The University of Manchester, which is one of the oldest in the UK. The University of Manchester played an important role in the development of computing. This includes the development of the first electronically stored program computer, the first floating-point machine, and the Atlas computer, which was once the world’s most powerful computer and the first machine to use paged virtual memory. The school and department of Computer Science was home to Alan Turing and Tom Kilburn; and in November 2018, the 1 million processor SpiNNaker neuromorphic supercomputer went into service under the supervision of Steve Furber.
  • 1. Types of Computers Contents

    1. Types of Computers Contents

    1. Types of Computers Contents 1 Classes of computers 1 1.1 Classes by size ............................................. 1 1.1.1 Microcomputers (personal computers) ............................ 1 1.1.2 Minicomputers (midrange computers) ............................ 1 1.1.3 Mainframe computers ..................................... 1 1.1.4 Supercomputers ........................................ 1 1.2 Classes by function .......................................... 2 1.2.1 Servers ............................................ 2 1.2.2 Workstations ......................................... 2 1.2.3 Information appliances .................................... 2 1.2.4 Embedded computers ..................................... 2 1.3 See also ................................................ 2 1.4 References .............................................. 2 1.5 External links ............................................. 2 2 List of computer size categories 3 2.1 Supercomputers ............................................ 3 2.2 Mainframe computers ........................................ 3 2.3 Minicomputers ............................................ 3 2.4 Microcomputers ........................................... 3 2.5 Mobile computers ........................................... 3 2.6 Others ................................................. 4 2.7 Distinctive marks ........................................... 4 2.8 Categories ............................................... 4 2.9 See also ................................................ 4 2.10 References
  • A Large Routine

    A Large Routine

    A large routine Freek Wiedijk It is not widely known, but already in June 1949∗ Alan Turing had the main concepts that still are the basis for the best approach to program verification known today (and for which Tony Hoare developed a logic in 1969). In his three page paper Checking a large routine, Turing describes how to verify the correctness of a program that calculates the factorial function by repeated additions. He both shows how to use invariants to establish the correctness of this program, as well as how to use a variant to establish termination. In the paper the program is only presented as a flow chart. A modern C rendering is: int fac (int n) { int s, r, u, v; for (u = r = 1; v = u, r < n; r++) for (s = 1; u += v, s++ < r; ) ; return u; } Turing's paper seems not to have been properly appreciated at the time. At the EDSAC conference where Turing presented the paper, Douglas Hartree criticized that the correctness proof sketched by Turing should not be called inductive. From a modern point of view this is clearly absurd. Marc Schoolderman first told me about this paper (and in his master's thesis used the modern Why3 tool of Jean-Christophe Filli^atreto make Turing's paper fully precise; he also wrote the above C version of Turing's program). He then challenged me to speculate what specific computer Turing had in mind in the paper, and what the actual program for that computer might have been. My answer is that the `EPICAC'y of this paper probably was the Manchester Mark 1.
  • Systems Architecture of the Ferranti Mark I and Mark I* Computers

    Systems Architecture of the Ferranti Mark I and Mark I* Computers

    Version 1, August 2011. CCS-F1X2 Systems Architecture of the Ferranti Mark I and Mark I* computers. Contents. 1. Historical development. 2. The early Manchester University computers, 1948 – 1949. 3. Overview of the Ferranti Mark I. 4. Summary of the main differences between the Ferranti Mark I and the Mark I*. 1. Historical development. These Ferranti machines were the fully-engineered production versions of prototype computers designed and built at the University of Manchester. The first of the prototypes was called the Small Scale Experimental Machine (SSEM), also known as the Baby. The SSEM first ran a program on the morning of Monday 21st June 1948, thereby being the world‟s first electronic stored-program computer to become operational. The SSEM was a minimal computer, primarily intended to test a novel storage system that had been developed by F C Williams and T Kilburn, first at the Telecommunications Research Establishment and then, from January 1947 at the Electro-technical Department of the University of Manchester where Professor Freddie Williams moved to become head of Department. Tom Kilburn was seconded to Manchester, to help with the storage research. The novel storage system, later to be called the Williams-Kilburn tube, depended upon regenerating a pattern of electrostatically- charged spots on the inner surface of a cathode ray tube. The system is thus sometimes called CRT storage, or electrostatic storage. Each charged spot represented a binary one or zero. Two varieties of spots were tried: dot-dash, and focus-defocus, the latter being used on the Ferranti computers. The system was patented and eventually used under licence on several early computers, including the IBM 701 and 702.
  • Università Degli Studi Di Padova Padua Research Archive

    Università Degli Studi Di Padova Padua Research Archive

    Università degli Studi di Padova Padua Research Archive - Institutional Repository Seventy Years of Getting Transistorized Original Citation: Availability: This version is available at: 11577/3257397 since: 2018-02-15T16:02:20Z Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. Published version: DOI: 10.1109/MIE.2017.2757775 Terms of use: Open Access This article is made available under terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Guidelines, as described at http://www.unipd.it/download/file/fid/55401 (Italian only) (Article begins on next page) Historical by Massimo Guarnieri Seventy Years of Getting Transistorized Massimo Guarnieri acuum tubes appeared at the germanium. His device resembled the War II. Ohl, an American researcher break of the 20th century, giv- previous work of Julius Edgar Lilienfeld at Bell Labs, had invented the doping Ving birth to electronics [1]. By the (1882–1963) and Russell Shoemaker technique and produced the first p–n 1930s, they had become established as a Ohl (1898–1987) [5]. Lilienfeld was a junction in 1939. The patent applica- mature technology, spreading into areas German physicist who had migrated to tion for the transistor was submitted such as radio communications, long- the United States in 1921, where he had in June 1948. Although Shockley led distance radiotelegraphy, radio broad- patented a field-effect-transistor-like the team of Bardeen and Brattain at the casting, telephone communication and device in 1925. However, he had been Solid-State Physics Group, they devel- switching, sound recording and play- unable to make a working prototype be- oped their two devices independently ing, television, radar, and air navigation cause of a lack of sufficiently pure crys- because of the strong antagonism be- [2].
  • Tom Kilburn (1921–2001) Determined to See Projects Through to Completion

    Tom Kilburn (1921–2001) Determined to See Projects Through to Completion

    news and views Obituary scientists at this time, his wartime experience in radar made him Tom Kilburn (1921–2001) determined to see projects through to completion. Kilburn’s enthusiasm for By 1947 the theory of general-purpose, implementation became the hallmark of stored-program computers was familiar to computer science at Manchester. Kilburn several research groups on both sides of was accorded the scientific accolade of the Atlantic. However, the lack of suitable fellowship of the Royal Society in 1965. high-speed memory devices stopped them Kilburn was a modest individual who turning theory into practice. To quote actively shunned publicity. In 1968 he was Nathaniel Rochester of IBM, writing in the asked why computer science textbooks premier US electronics journal (Proc. IRE, seldom mentioned the early pioneering p. 374; April 1950): “The most difficult work at Manchester. Kilburn paused, and problem in the construction of large-scale then replied mysteriously: “Because those digital computers continues to be the who need to know, do know.” Such question of how to build a memory, and isolationism was sometimes the despair of MANCHESTER DEPT COMPUTER SCIENCE, UNIV. the few papers written do not reflect the his more gregarious colleagues, but greatness of the effort which is being Kilburn’s ability to remain focused on a exerted.” It was in this context that Tom problem enabled him to lead his team Kilburn began working for his PhD at the from the front. University of Manchester. His task was to In a field of scientific endeavour perfect a new form of digital memory. characterized by transitory, ad hoc The starting point was an observation by developments, it is not easy to explain F.
  • Unioversity the World's First Programmable Computer Was Developed at Manchester University

    Unioversity the World's First Programmable Computer Was Developed at Manchester University

    ElPioneers In Computing Unioversity The world's first programmable computer was developed at Manchester University After the Second World War had ended, of being random access, and the contents of the Manchester University appointed two new main store or the control register could be visually professors. Following his code-breaking work displayed. with Colossus, the world's first electromechanical Once the feasibility of using a Williams tube for computer, at Bletchley Park, Max Newman memory storage was established, an enhanced became professor of mathematics; and a radar Mark I was built that could perform work on engineer, F C Williams, was appointed head of optics design problems and the generation of electrical engineering. Williams brought with him prime numbers. The government chief scientist, a young assistant, Tom Kilburn, who was familiar Sir Ben Lockspeiser, was so impressed by the with the problems of pulse electronic-memory performance of the computer that he arranged for devices, which he had encountered in his wartime a commercial version of the Mark Ito be built by a work with radar. Kilburn was later to become the local Manchester company. The Ferranti Mark I first professor of the new discipline of computer became available in February 1951, preceding studies at Manchester University. UNIVAC by five months and establishing itself as During a tour of radar establishments in the the first commercially available computer. United States in 1946, Williams had been shown An important innovation on the Ferranti Mark the prototype of the valve computer ENIAC (see I was its ability to modify instructions during page 46), and on his return to England he processing using another store called the `B' tube.
  • Lean, Tom. "Electronic Brains." Electronic Dreams: How 1980S Britain Learned to Love the Computer. London: Bloomsbury Sigma, 2016

    Lean, Tom. "Electronic Brains." Electronic Dreams: How 1980S Britain Learned to Love the Computer. London: Bloomsbury Sigma, 2016

    Lean, Tom. "Electronic Brains." Electronic Dreams: How 1980s Britain Learned to Love the Computer. London: Bloomsbury Sigma, 2016. 9–33. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472936653.0004>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 05:11 UTC. Copyright © Tom Lean 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. CHAPTER ONE Electronic Brains n June 1948, in a drab laboratory in the Gothic surroundings Iof the Victoria University of Manchester, a small team of electronics engineers observed the success of an experiment they had been working on for months. The object of their interest was an untidy mass of electronics that fi lled the tall, bookcase-like racks lining the walls of the room. At the centre of this bird ’ s nest of cables, radio valves and other components glowed a small, round display screen that allowed a glimpse into the machine ’ s electronic memory, a novel device sitting off to one side hidden in a metal box. This hotchpotch assembly of electronic bits and bobs was offi cially known as the Small- Scale Experimental Machine (SSEM), but has become better known as the ‘ Manchester Baby ’ . It was the world ’ s fi rst electronic stored program computer, a computer that used an electronic memory to store data and the program that instructed it what to do, the basic architecture still used by most computers today. Baby ’ s creators, Tom Kilburn, Geoff rey Tootill and Freddy Williams, were all electronics engineers seasoned by years of work developing wartime radar systems under great secrecy and urgency.