Evaluation of the Benin Power Compact's Electricity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of the Benin Power Compact's Electricity Anchor Final Report Evaluation of the Benin Power Compact’s Electricity Generation and Distribution Projects: Baseline Report May 2020 Sarah M. Hughes, Christopher Ksoll, Kristine Bos, Anthony Harris, Serge Kennely Wongla, Dara Bernstein, Cullen Seaton and Galina Lapadatova Submitted to: Millennium Challenge Corporation 1099 Fourteenth St, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 2005 Project Officers: Julian Glucroft and Shreena Patel Contract Number: 95332418C0129 Submitted by: Mathematica 1100 1st Street, NE, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20002-4221 Phone: (202) 484-9220 Fax: (202) 863-1763 This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. Benin Energy Infrastructure Baseline Report Mathematica ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report reflects the contributions of many people. From the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), Project Monitor Julian Glucroft and Contracting Officer’s Representative Shreena Patel provided us guidance and support throughout the inception and baseline period of the evaluation. The report would not have been possible without the contributions of many partners in the Millennium Challenge Account-Benin II and Société Beninoise d’Energie Electrique (SBEE). We would first like to acknowledge the wide range of Millennium Challenge Account-Benin II implementers, engineers, consultants, and coordinators who generously shared their time and attention to help improve the quality, comprehensiveness, and depth of the study. We are grateful to the many stakeholders in Benin who provided in-person or written feedback on the report content. This report depended on contributions from a wide range of data collection, supervisory, and support staff. We are particularly indebted for the quality of the survey and qualitative data which would not have been possible without the deep contributions of Serge Kennely Wongla, who supervised data collection activities as a locally based member of Mathematica’s evaluation team and who provided input on the data collection instruments and contributed substantially to the analysis. We appreciate Fidexi-Conseil and the Innovative Hub for Research in Africa for the successful implementation of the baseline listing and survey data collection efforts. We are grateful to Laboratoire d’Anthropologie Appliquée et d’Education au Développement Durable which successfully conducted the baseline qualitative data collection. We would also like to thank the many individuals, household members, businesspeople, civil servants, government representatives and implementers who responded to our surveys and participated in in-depth interviews. Denzel Hankinson provided sector expertise through the design stage and Mawuena Adjogah provided guidance on the design and data collection stages of the project. At Mathematica, Arif Mamun provided technical input and thoughtful comments on the draft report. Matthew Ribar and Samuel Studnitzer provided programming support. We would also like to thank the editorial and administrative support staff at Mathematica, as well as our colleagues who assisted with translation to French. Mathematica strives to improve public well-being by bringing the highest standards of quality, objectivity, and excellence to bear when collecting information and performing analysis for our clients. The findings in this report solely reflect Mathematica’s interpretation of available information. Mathematica staff involved in analyzing the information and authoring this report did not report any conflicts of interest. The evaluation was funded exclusively by the Millennium Challenge Corporation. iii This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. Benin Energy Infrastructure Baseline Report Mathematica CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ III ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................................ XI I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Overview of the Electricity Generation and Distribution Projects .................................................. 2 B. Overview of the evaluation ............................................................................................................ 5 1. Quantitative evaluation methodology .................................................................................... 8 2. Qualitative evaluation methodology ..................................................................................... 10 3. Timeline for data collection, evaluation, and project activities ............................................ 10 C. Key baseline findings................................................................................................................... 11 D. Road map of the report................................................................................................................ 12 II. ANALYSIS OF PROJECT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................... 13 A. Findings on project design .......................................................................................................... 14 B. Findings on early implementation status ..................................................................................... 16 III. ANALYSIS OF GRID-LEVEL OUTCOMES ........................................................................................ 19 A. Sampling for grid-level outcomes ................................................................................................ 20 1. Definition of project areas .................................................................................................... 20 2. Sampling for placement of grid monitors ............................................................................. 20 3. Sampling for placement of smart meters ............................................................................. 21 4. Sampling for qualitative data ............................................................................................... 21 B. Baseline data sources and outcome definitions .......................................................................... 22 IV. END USER OUTCOMES AT BASELINE ............................................................................................ 27 A. Sampling for end user outcomes and baseline characteristics ................................................... 28 1. Definition of sample for end users ....................................................................................... 28 2. Baseline characteristics of household and business sample .............................................. 29 B. Baseline data sources and outcome definitions .......................................................................... 30 1. Quantitative analysis............................................................................................................ 30 2. Qualitative analysis .............................................................................................................. 31 C. Baseline status of end user outcomes ........................................................................................ 32 1. Household outcomes ........................................................................................................... 32 2. Business outcomes.............................................................................................................. 38 3. Public institutions ................................................................................................................. 46 v Benin Energy Infrastructure Baseline Report Mathematica V. EVALUATION ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................................... 49 A. Summary of IRB requirements and clearances .......................................................................... 49 B. Preparing data files for access, privacy, and documentation ...................................................... 49 C. Dissemination plan ...................................................................................................................... 50 D. Evaluation team: Roles and responsibilities ................................................................................ 50 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 53 APPENDIX A: OVERVIEW OF PRIMARY DATA COLLECTION ............................................................. A.1 APPENDIX B: ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTIVE TABLES FOR HOUSEHOLD DATA, DISAGGREGATED BY PROJECT AREA AND BY GENDER OF HOUSEHOLD HEAD ......................... B.1 APPENDIX C: ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTIVE TABLES FOR BUSINESS DATA, DISAGGREGATED BY PROJECT AREA AND BY GENDER OF HOUSEHOLD HEAD .........................C.1 APPENDIX D: VALUES AT BASELINE FOR OUTCOMES SELECTED FOR TELEPHONE SURVEY.....................................................................................................................................................D.1 APPENDIX E: STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND RESPONSES ......................................................... E.1 vi Benin Energy Infrastructure Baseline Report Mathematica TABLES I.1 Evaluation design overview: Summary of research questions, methods, and data sources ........... 6 I.2 Data sources
Recommended publications
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Projdoc.Pdf
    Tanguieta Toucountouna Benin Natitingou Perma Intervention areas: child protection, hunger and health Abomey Condji - Lokossa Cotonou Project “Nurse Me” This project stems from the need to support the children hosted in three of our accommodation centres in Benin, through the supply of powder milk. ‘Nurse me’ involves undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, and who for these reasons can’t be breastfed during the first months of their lives. The project develops in the regions of Zou and Atacora, two areas in which inhabitants live mainly in rural villages. The health situation in these regions is alarming: childbirth mortality rate is extremely high and newborns are often underweight. Moreover, breastfeeding without blood ties is not contemplated in Benin’s culture. This factor, together with malnutrition, lack of hygiene, and the rampant plague of AIDS, causes several deceases. In addition to this, international aid has decreased, because of two issues: 1) the global economic crisis has led governments to reduce the aid to the countries of the South; 2) the World Food Programme has diminished the food aid in favour of Benin, in order to allocate more in support of countries at war. Insieme ai bambini del mondo Project objectives - Promote the right to life and health; - Prevent babies’ premature death caused by the impossibility of breastfeeding. Project beneficiaries - Undernourished, motherless, neglected children or whose mothers are HIV positive, who are hosted in our accommodation centres or monitored by the nutritional centre; - Families living in rural areas around our accommodation centres, which can benefit from a free health and nutritional service for their children.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation
    The Dynamic Gravity Dataset: Technical Documentation Lead Authors:∗ Tamara Gurevich and Peter Herman Contributing Authors: Nabil Abbyad, Meryem Demirkaya, Austin Drenski, Jeffrey Horowitz, and Grace Kenneally Version 1.00 Abstract This document provides technical documentation for the Dynamic Gravity dataset. The Dynamic Gravity dataset provides extensive country and country pair information for a total of 285 countries and territories, annually, between the years 1948 to 2016. This documentation extensively describes the methodology used for the creation of each variable and the information sources they are based on. Additionally, it provides a large collection of summary statistics to aid in the understanding of the resulting Dynamic Gravity dataset. This documentation is the result of ongoing professional research of USITC Staff and is solely meant to represent the opinions and professional research of individual authors. It is not meant to represent in any way the views of the U.S. International Trade Commission or any of its individual Commissioners. It is circulated to promote the active exchange of ideas between USITC Staff and recognized experts outside the USITC, professional devel- opment of Office Staff and increase data transparency by encouraging outside professional critique of staff research. Please address all correspondence to [email protected] or [email protected]. ∗We thank Renato Barreda, Fernando Gracia, Nuhami Mandefro, and Richard Nugent for research assistance in completion of this project. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Nomenclature . .3 1.2 Variables Included in the Dataset . .3 1.3 Contents of the Documentation . .6 2 Country or Territory and Year Identifiers 6 2.1 Record Identifiers .
    [Show full text]
  • S a Rd in Ia
    M. Mandarino/Istituto Euromediterraneo, Tempio Pausania (Sardinia) Land07-1Book 1.indb 97 12-07-2007 16:30:59 Demarcation conflicts within and between communities in Benin: identity withdrawals and contested co-existence African urban development policy in the 1990s focused on raising municipal income from land. Population growth and a neoliberal environment weakened the control of clans and lineages over urban land ownership to the advantage of individuals, but without eradicating the importance of personal relationships in land transactions or of clans and lineages in the political structuring of urban space. The result, especially in rural peripheries, has been an increase in land aspirations and disputes and in their social costs, even in districts with the same territorial control and/or the same lines of nobility. Some authors view this simply as land “problems” and not as conflicts pitting locals against outsiders and degenerating into outright clashes. However, decentralization gives new dimensions to such problems and is the backdrop for clashes between differing perceptions of territorial control. This article looks at the ethnographic features of some of these clashes in the Dahoman historic region of lower Benin, where boundaries are disputed in a context of poorly managed urban development. Such disputes stem from land registries of the previous but surviving royal administration, against which the fragile institutions of the modern state seem to be poorly equipped. More than a simple problem of land tenure, these disputes express an internal rejection of the legitimacy of the state to engage in spatial structuring based on an ideal of co-existence; a contestation that is put forward with the de facto complicity of those acting on behalf of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Pédologique De Reconnaissance De La République Populaire Du Bénin À 1/200.000 : Feuille De Djougou
    P. FAURE NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la République Populaire du Bénin à 1/200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU OFFICE OE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIWE ET TECHNIOUE OUTRE-MER 1 PARIS 1977 NOTICE EXPLICATIVE No 66 (4) CARTE PEDOLOGIQUE DE RECONNAISSANCE de la RepubliquePopulaire du Bénin à 1 /200.000 Feuille de DJOUGOU P. FAURE ORSTOM PARIS 1977 @ORSTOM 2977 ISBN 2-7099-0423-3(édition cornpl8te) ISBN 2-7099-0433-0 SOMMAI RE l. l INTRODUCTION ........................................ 1 I .GENERALITES SUR LE MILIEU ET LA PEDOGENESE ........... 3 Localisationgéographique ............................ 3 Les conditionsde milieu 1. Le climat ................... 3 2 . La végétation ................. 6 3 . Le modelé et l'hydrographie ....... 8 4 . Le substratum géologique ........ 10 Les matériaux originels et la pédogenèse .................. 12 1 . Les matériaux originels .......... 12 2 . Les processus pédogénétiques ...... 13 II-LESSOLS .......................................... 17 Classification 1. Principes de classification ....... 17 2 . La légende .................. 18 Etudemonographique 1 . Les sols minérauxbruts ......... 20 2 . Les sois peuévolués ............ 21 3 . Les sols ferrugineuxtropicaux ....... 21 4 . Les sols ferraliitiques ........... 38 CONCLUSION .......................................... 43 Répartitiondes' sols . Importance relative . Critèresd'utilisation . 43 Les principalescontraintes pour la mise en valeur ............ 46 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ........................................ 49 1 INTRODUCTION La carte pédologique de reconnaissance à 1/200 000, feuille DJOUGOU, fait partie d'un ensemble de neuf coupures imprimées couvrant la totalité du terri- toire de la République Populaire du Bénin. Les travaux de terrain de la couverture générale ont été effectués de 1967 à 1971 par les quatre pédologues de la Section de Pédologie du Centre O. R.S. T.O.M. de Cotonou : D. DUBROEUCQ, P. FAURE, M. VIENNOT, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Benin Electricity Access Scale-Up Project
    The World Bank Benin Electricity Access Scale-up (BEAS) Project (P173749) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Project Information Document (PID) Appraisal Stage | Date Prepared/Updated: 09-Apr-2021 | Report No: PIDA31110 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Mar 12, 2021 Page 1 of 17 The World Bank Benin Electricity Access Scale-up (BEAS) Project (P173749) BASIC INFORMATION OPS_TABLE_BASIC_DATA A. Basic Project Data Country Project ID Project Name Parent Project ID (if any) Benin P173749 Benin Electricity Access Scale-up (BEAS) Project Region Estimated Appraisal Date Estimated Board Date Practice Area (Lead) AFRICA WEST 21-Apr-2021 14-Jun-2021 Energy & Extractives Financing Instrument Borrower(s) Implementing Agency Investment Project Financing Republic of Benin Ministry of Energy Proposed Development Objective(s) The PDO is to increase access to electricity services for households, enterprises, and public facilities Components Component 1: On-grid electrification Component 2: Policy and regulatory actions to implement the national electrification strategy and related investment programs Component 3: Technical Assistance and Implementation Support PROJECT FINANCING DATA (US$, Millions) SUMMARY-NewFin1 Total Project Cost 200.00 Total Financing 200.00 of which IBRD/IDA 200.00 Financing Gap 0.00 DETAILS-NewFinEnh1 World Bank Group Financing International Development Association (IDA) 200.00 IDA Credit 200.00 Mar 12, 2021 Page 2 of 17 The World Bank Benin Electricity Access Scale-up (BEAS) Project (P173749) Environmental and Social Risk Classification Moderate Decision The review did authorize the team to appraise and negotiate Other Decision (as needed) B. Introduction and Context Country Context 1. Benin is a lower-middle income country with significant economic growth but persistent poverty levels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine People Suspected Dead of Lassa Fever in Benin 2 February 2016
    Nine people suspected dead of Lassa fever in Benin 2 February 2016 As the world ramps up its fight against the Zika bodily fluids of an infected person. virus, West Africa is battling to contain a growing outbreak of Lassa fever with nine people in Benin © 2016 AFP reported dead, a health official told AFP Tuesday. "Right now, there are a total of 20 suspected cases with nine deaths," government health official Orou Bagou Yorou Chabi said. The first Lassa fever case in the West African country of 10 million people was listed at the Hospital of St Martin de Papane, in Tchaourou, a city 350 km (220 miles) north of Cotonou, the United Nations children agency UNICEF said in a statement. An ongoing epidemic in neighbouring Nigeria has already killed 84 people, out of 168 suspected cases, according to UNICEF. Stocks of Ribavirin, a drug used to treat the infection, were being shipped to Tchaourou and Cotonou, the UN agency added. Benin was last hit by a Lassa fever outbreak in October 2014, when nine people suspected of having the virus died. Lassa fever belongs to the same family as Marburg and Ebola, two deadly viruses that lead to infections with fever, vomiting and, in worse case scenarios, haemorrhagic bleeding. Its name is from the town of Lassa in northern Nigeria where it was first identified in 1969. Endemic to the region, Lassa fever is asymptomatic in 80 percent of cases but for others it can cause internal bleeding, especially when diagnosed late. The virus is spread through contact with food or household items contaminated with rats' urine or faeces or after coming in direct contact with the 1 / 2 APA citation: Nine people suspected dead of Lassa fever in Benin (2016, February 2) retrieved 29 September 2021 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-02-people-dead-lassa-fever-benin.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Trip Report
    Estimating the In-Country Distribution Costs of Malaria Commodities in Benin and Kenya April 2014 Estimating the In-Country Distribution Costs of Malaria Commodities in Benin and Kenya Brittany Johnson Rima Shretta Lisa Smith Prashant Yadav Ravi Anupindi April 2014 Estimating the In-Country Distribution Costs of Malaria Commodities in Benin and Kenya This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the US Agency for International Development (USAID), under the terms of cooperative agreement number AID-OAA-A-11- 00021. The contents are the responsibility of Management Sciences for Health and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. About SIAPS The goal of the Systems for Improved Access to Pharmaceuticals and Services (SIAPS) Program is to assure the availability of quality pharmaceutical products and effective pharmaceutical services to achieve desired health outcomes. Toward this end, the SIAPS result areas include improving governance, building capacity for pharmaceutical management and services, addressing information needed for decision- making in the pharmaceutical sector, strengthening financing strategies and mechanisms to improve access to medicines, and increasing quality pharmaceutical services. About WDI The William Davidson Institute (WDI) is a non-profit research and educational institute at the University of Michigan that promotes actionable business and public policy approaches to address the challenges and opportunities within emerging market economies. More specifically, the WDI Healthcare Research Initiative produces independent, multi-disciplinary research and business knowledge to help increase access to essential medicines, vaccines and other health technologies in developing countries. Recommended Citation This report may be reproduced if credit is given to SIAPS.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Benin Railway Assessment
    2.4 Benin Railway Assessment Benin railway network was constructed between 1900 and 1936. It’s structured around a single track, narrow gauge (1m) of 577 km in total and divided in three lines: 1. The Central line, from Cotonou to Parakou - 438km. 2. The West line, linked to the central line at Pahou (Pobè) - 32 km from Pahou to Segbohoue via Ouidah. 3. The East line, from Cotonou to Pobe via Porto-Novo, 107 km. For the moment, only the central line is being used and the last two lines have been put out of operation: Cotonou – Pobè and Cotonou – Sègbohoué. In November 2013, Benin and Niger signed a memorandum of understanding for the construction of a railway line linking Cotonou to Niamey, Niger. In addition to linking Parakou with Gaya, this project aimed to rehabilitate and modernize the Cotonou-Parakou railway line. The end of the work was originally scheduled for September 2015 but has been delayed. The governments of Benin and Niger decided to launch the project AFRICARAIL together with Togo and Burkina Faso. The objective of the project is for the first phase to build 1,300 km of rails to connect to the partner countries. For further information on contact details for railway companies please see the following links: 4.1 Benin Government Contact List 4.9 Benin Railway Companies Contact List Travel Time Matrix Travel Time from Capital City to Major Towns (Hours) Cotonou Abomey Parakou Cotonou - 2h 9h Abomey 2h - 7h Parakou 9h 7h - Railway Companies and Consortia The former joint organization Benin Niger Railways and Transport Organisation (OCBN) was privatised in 2014 to become Benin Rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographie Des Départements Du Zou Et Des Collines
    Spatialisation des cibles prioritaires des ODD au Bénin : Monographie des départements du Zou et des Collines Note synthèse sur l’actualisation du diagnostic et la priorisation des cibles des communes du département de Zou Collines Une initiative de : Direction Générale de la Coordination et du Suivi des Objectifs de Développement Durable (DGCS-ODD) Avec l’appui financier de : Programme d’appui à la Décentralisation et Projet d’Appui aux Stratégies de Développement au Développement Communal (PDDC / GIZ) (PASD / PNUD) Fonds des Nations unies pour l'enfance Fonds des Nations unies pour la population (UNICEF) (UNFPA) Et l’appui technique du Cabinet Cosinus Conseils Tables des matières 1.1. BREF APERÇU SUR LE DEPARTEMENT ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1. INFORMATIONS SUR LES DEPARTEMENTS ZOU-COLLINES ...................................................................................... 6 1.1.1.1. Aperçu du département du Zou .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1. GRAPHIQUE 1: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DU ZOU ............................................................................................... 7 1.1.1.2. Aperçu du département des Collines .................................................................................................. 8 3.1.2. GRAPHIQUE 2: CARTE DU DEPARTEMENT DES COLLINES .................................................................................... 10 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Anopheles Gambiae in Three Communes of Northern Benin, West Africa Casimir Dossou Kpanou1,2*, Hermann W
    Kpanou et al. Malar J (2021) 20:328 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-021-03856-2 Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access Characterization of resistance profle (intensity and mechanisms) of Anopheles gambiae in three communes of northern Benin, West Africa Casimir Dossou Kpanou1,2*, Hermann W. Sagbohan1,2, Fortuné Dagnon3,6, Germain G. Padonou1,2, Razaki Ossè1,4, Albert Sourou Salako1,2, Aboubakar Sidick1, Wilfried Sewadé1, André Sominahouin1,2, Patrick Condo3, Saadani Hassani Ahmed3, Daniel Impoinvil5 and Martin Akogbéto1,2 Abstract Background: The selection and the spread of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors to the main classes of insec- ticides used in vector control tools are a major and ongoing challenge to malaria vector control programmes. This study aimed to determine the intensity of vector resistance to insecticides in three regions of Benin with diferent agro-ecological characteristics. Methods: Larvae of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.) were collected from September to November 2017 in difer- ent larval sites in three northern Benin communes: Parakou, Kandi and Malanville. Two to fve-day-old, non-blood-fed, female mosquitoes were exposed to papers impregnated with deltamethrin, permethrin and bendiocarb at dosages of 1 the diagnostic dose, 5 and 10 to determine the intensity of resistance in these vectors. Molecular frequen- cies ×of the kdr L1014F and ace-1R× G119S× insecticide resistance mutations and levels of detoxifcation enzymes were determined for mosquitoes sampled at each study site. Results: Resistance to pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin) was recorded in all three communes with mortal- ity rates below 60% using the diagnostic dose (1x). The results obtained after exposure of An.
    [Show full text]