DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial Politics: Readings from Judicature, 3Rd Edition 2Nd Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judicial Politics: Readings from Judicature, 3Rd Edition 2Nd Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook JUDICIAL POLITICS: READINGS FROM JUDICATURE, 3RD EDITION 2ND EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Elliot E Slotnick | 9781568029443 | | | | | Judicial Politics: Readings From Judicature, 3rd Edition 2nd edition PDF Book Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. It is important to distinguish between two methods of corruption of the judiciary: the state through budget planning and privileges being the most dangerous, and private. Historically, the appellate function had a connection with the executive branch due to the types of cases typically heard — impeachment and the hearing of felony charges against peers. Accursius wrote the Glossa Ordinaria in , ending the early scholastics. The unwritten norm is said to be implied by the preamble to the Constitution Act, Under the doctrine of the separation of powers , the judiciary generally does not make statutory law which is the responsibility of the legislature or enforce law which is the responsibility of the executive , but rather interprets law, defends and applies it to the facts of each case. It forms the first part of the collection of six legal texts, which together became known as the Corpus Juris Canonici. Consequently, judicial compensation committees such as the Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission now recommend judicial salaries in Canada. The first phase, In Iure , was the judicial process. These include rights to tenure although the Constitution has since been amended to introduce mandatory retirement at age 75 and the right to a salary determined by the Parliament of Canada as opposed to the executive. Judges require ten years of experience in practical affairs, as a public prosecutor or practicing attorney. They do, however, involve tenure, financial security and some administrative control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved 11 October The year saw a major shift towards judicial independence, as the Supreme Court of Canada in the Provincial Judges Reference found an unwritten constitutional norm guaranteeing judicial independence to all judges, including civil law inferior court judges. This led to the Glossators to start translating and recreating the Corpus Iuris Civilis and create literature around it:. God vs. During the middle ages , under the Norman monarchy of the Kingdom of England , the king and his Curia Regis held judicial power. The last form was also called secular law, or Roman law. The Eucharist in Medieval Canon Law. It was a combination of canon law, which represented the common norms and principles, and Roman law, which were the actual rules and terms. The final product was known as Ius Commune. Once appointed, assistant judges still may not qualify to sit alone until they have served for five years, and have been appointed by the Supreme Court of Japan. Publisher: CQ Press , Views Read Edit View history. Slotnick is professor of political science and associate dean of the Graduate School at The Ohio State University, where he has taught since Sandefur, Timothy In Chief Justice of NSW Tom Bathurst identified the way in which judicial and court performance was measured as one of the most substantial risks to the separation of powers in Australia. Current version as at 23 Oct Please check the legislation timeline to ensure that you are viewing the correct legislation version. See also Peter H. Seller Inventory S The most important part was Ius Civile Latin for "civil law". Amended by Act 43 of The rediscovery of the Digesta from the Corpus Iuris Civilis led the university of Bologna to start teaching Roman law. History of Roman Legal Science. Amended by Act 29 of If the judiciary and executive are constantly feuding, no government can function well. The second is the principle of parliamentary privilege : that Members of Parliament are protected from prosecution in certain circumstances by the courts. Amended by Act 42 of The United States federal court system consists of 94 federal judicial districts. Main article: Judicial independence in Singapore. Seller Inventory think To safeguard judicial independence, Singapore law lays down special procedures to be followed before the conduct of Supreme Court judges may be discussed in Parliament and for their removal from office for misconduct, and provides that their remuneration may not be reduced during their tenure. Books at Iowa. Bush then pending in the Florida Supreme Court , whose members had all been appointed by Democratic governors, is seen by many as reinforcing the need for judicial independence, both with regard to the Florida Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court. Introduction to Reformed Scholasticism. Judicial Politics: Readings From Judicature, 3rd Edition 2nd edition Writer An Act relating to the constitution and powers of the superior courts of judicature. Supreme Court of Judicature Act. That is, courts should not be subject to improper influence from the other branches of government or from private or partisan interests. This specific ISBN edition is currently not available. Seller Inventory n. The White House. Chiron Media Wallingford, United Kingdom. Amended by Act 2 of Zelermyer, William First education was limited to the monasteries and abbies, but expanded to cathedrals and schools in the city in the 11th century, eventually creating universities. He earned his Ph. In this system the Supreme Court is always the final authority, but criminal cases have four stages, one more than civil law does. The most important change in this period was the shift from priest to praetor as the head of the judicial system. Courts with judicial review power may annul the laws and rules of the state when it finds them incompatible with a higher norm, such as primary legislation , the provisions of the constitution , treaties or international law. Levi, Edward H. Amended by Act 3 of They looked at a subject in a logical and systematic way by writing comments with the texts, treatises and consilia , which are advises given according to the old Roman law. To safeguard judicial independence, Singapore law lays down special procedures to be followed before the conduct of Supreme Court judges may be discussed in Parliament and for their removal from office for misconduct, and provides that their remuneration may not be reduced during their tenure. Cooke ed. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Contract theory Critical legal studies Comparative law Feminist Fundamental theory of canon law Law and economics Legal formalism History International legal theory Principle of legality Rule of law Sociology. Furthermore, judicial support of the executive is not as negative as it seems as the executive is the branch of government with the greatest claim to democratic legitimacy. The Decretalists , like the post-glossators for Ius Civile , started to write treatises, comments and advises with the texts. Seller Inventory SX In transitional and developing countries, spending on the judiciary may be controlled by the executive. They also were allowed to give legal advise on behalf of the emperor. In the People's Republic of China , the final authority on the interpretation of the law is the National People's Congress. See also FAQ B3. Judicial Politics: Readings From Judicature, 3rd Edition 2nd edition Reviews It is important to distinguish between two methods of corruption of the judiciary: the state through budget planning and privileges being the most dangerous, and private. The last form was also called secular law, or Roman law. Hidden categories: CS1 maint: archived copy as title Articles with short description Short description matches Wikidata All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from May Under an independent judicial system, the courts and its officers are free from inappropriate intervention in the judiciary 's affairs. McCloskey, Robert G. Amended by Act 30 of Current version as at 23 Oct Please check the legislation timeline to ensure that you are viewing the correct legislation version. They would merely have to judge the case. For judicial systems of individual countries other than Japan, Mexico, and the US for which see below , and some US states, see "Judiciary of Sandefur, Timothy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Marshall, Thurgood The Stuart dynasty used this power frequently in order to overpower the Parliament of England. The Constitution provides that federal judges , including judges of the Supreme Court of the United States , are appointed by the President "by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. More information about this seller Contact this seller. Without this, all the reservations of particular rights or privileges would amount to nothing. The 94 districts are then divided up into twelve regional circuits. Seller Inventory n. Canon law knows a few forms of laws: the canones , decisions made by Councils, and the decreta , decisions made by the Popes. Featuring carefully selected articles from Judicature, this reader delivers the journal's renowned diversity of opinion, accessibility of writing, and welcome blend of both scholarly and real—world perspectives. Cambridge University Press. Common law decisions set precedent for all courts to follow. By the fifteenth century, the king's role in this feature of government became small. A Singapore Government Agency Website. The United States federal court system consists of 94 federal judicial districts. Seller Inventory AAV Japan 's process for selecting judges is longer and more stringent than in various countries, like the United States and in Mexico. On the court sits a total of nine justices. Judicial Politics: Readings from Judicature. The Constitutional Reform Act dramatically reformed government control over the administration of justice in England and Wales; importantly, it discontinued the position of the Lord Chancellor , one of the country's oldest constitutional offices, who was entrusted with a combination of legislative, executive, and judicial capacities. In other words, they do not set precedent. Canada has a level of judicial independence entrenched in its Constitution , awarding superior court justices various guarantees to independence under sections 96 to of the Constitution Act, View all copies of this ISBN edition:.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Part I Background and Summary
    PART I BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Chapter 1 BRITISH STATUTES IN IDSTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The North American plantations were not the earliest over­ seas possessions of the English Crown; neither were they the first to be treated as separate political entities, distinct from the realm of England. From the time of the Conquest onward, the King of England held -- though not necessarily simultaneously or continuously - a variety of non-English possessions includ­ ing Normandy, Anjou, the Channel Islands, Wales, Jamaica, Scotland, the Carolinas, New-York, the Barbadoes. These hold­ ings were not a part of the Kingdom of England but were govern­ ed by the King of England. During the early medieval period the King would issue such orders for each part of his realm as he saw fit. Even as he tended to confer more and more with the officers of the royal household and with the great lords of England - the group which eventually evolved into the Council out of which came Parliament - with reference to matters re­ lating to England, he did likewise with matters relating to his non-English possessions.1 Each part of the King's realm had its own peculiar laws and customs, as did the several counties of England. The middle ages thrived on diversity and while the King's writ was acknowledged eventually to run throughout England, there was little effort to eliminate such local practices as did not impinge upon the power of the Crown. The same was true for the non-Eng­ lish lands. An order for one jurisdictional entity typically was limited to that entity alone; uniformity among the several parts of the King's realm was not considered sufficiently important to overturn existing laws and customs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medieval Parliament
    THE MEDIEVAL PARLIAMENT General 4006. Allen, John. "History of the English legislature." Edinburgh Review 35 (March-July 1821): 1-43. [Attributed in the Wellesley Index; a review of the "Reports on the Dignity of a Peer".] 4007. Arnold, Morris S. "Statutes as judgments: the natural law theory of parliamentary activities in medieval England." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 126 (1977-78): 329-43. 4008. Barraclough, G. "Law and legislation in medieval England." Law Quarterly Review 56 (1940): 75-92. 4009. Bemont, Charles. "La séparation du Parlement anglais en deux Chambres." In Actes du premier Congrès National des Historiens Français. Paris 20-23 Avril 1927, edited by Comite Français des Sciences Historiques: 33-35. Paris: Éditions Rieder, 1928. 4010. Betham, William. Dignities, feudal and parliamentary, and the constitutional legislature of the United Kingdom: the nature and functions of the Aula Regis, the Magna Concilia and the Communa Concilia of England, and the history of the parliaments of France, England, Scotland, and Ireland, investigated and considered with a view to ascertain the origin, progress, and final establishment of legislative parliaments, and the dignity of a peer, or Lord of Parliament. London: Thomas and William Boone, 1830. xx, 379p. [A study of the early history of the Parliaments of England, Ireland and Scotland, with special emphasis on the peerage; Vol. I only published.] 4011. Bodet, Gerald P. Early English parliaments: high courts, royal councils, or representative assemblies? Problems in European civilization. Boston, Mass.: Heath, 1967. xx,107p. [A collection of extracts from leading historians.] 4012. Boutmy, E. "La formation du Parlement en Angleterre." Revue des Deux Mondes 68 (March-April 1885): 82-126.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to British History I
    HIST 2403 Introduction to British History I: POLITICAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HISTORY OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND, FROM THE NORMAN CONQUEST (1066) TO THE RESTORATION (1660) Fall 2009, Room 2082,Tuesday & Thursday, 4:00--5:40 p.m. Instructor: Prof. Ian Gentles Office: Room 1111 Phone: 416-226-6620 ext. 6718 E-mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Tues. 2:30-3:45, Thurs. 2:30- 3:45, OR by appointment Commuter Hotline: 416-226-6620 ext. 2187 Class cancellations due to inclement weather or illness will be announced/posted on the commuter hotline. Mailboxes: Every student is responsible for information communicated through the student mailboxes. A mailbox directory is posted beside the mailboxes. I. COURSE DESCRIPTION An outline of British history from the Norman conquest to the mid-seventeenth century revolution, this course pays particular attention to the history of monarchy, parliament and the church. Specific topics include the conflict between crown and aristocracy, the rise of parliament, the Reformation and the factors that led to the turbulence of the seventeenth century. II. REQUIRED TEXTS 1. Lehmberg, Stanford E. and Samantha Meigs. The Peoples of the British Isles from Prehistoric Times to 1688 . Chicago: Lyceum, 2009 2. Course Pack: Documents, readings and maps for use in tutorial discussion. (available in the bookstore) III. COURSE EVALUATION Examination : Test - Thursday, 22nd October (in class) 10% Essay - 2,000-2500 words, Thursday, 26 November 30% Examination (during December exam period) 40% Class participation 20% (total) 100% Term work : a. You are expected to attend the tutorials, preparing for them through the lectures and through assigned reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereignty in British Legal Doctrine*
    SOVEREIGNTY IN BRITISH LEGAL DOCTRINE* Joaquín Varela Suanzes-Carpegna I. INTRODUCTION.- II. FROM THE LOWER MIDDLE AGES TO THE REVOLUTION OF 1688.- 2.1. Bracton and Fortescue.- 2.2. The formulation of parliamentary soverignty under the Tudors.- 2.3. Absolutism and Constitutionalism under the Stuarts.- 2.4. The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty Parliament.- III. SOVEREIGNTY IN JOHN LOCKE'S "SECOND TREATISE ON CIVIL GOVERNMENT".- 3.1. Government by the consent of the governed.- 3.2. The separation of powers.- 3.3. The supremacy and limits of the legislature.- 3.4. The sovereignty of the people.- IV. FROM HUME TO PALEY.- 4.1. David Hume, Locke's critic: Parliament is sovereign, not the people.- 4.2. William Blackstone's ambivalent attitude.- V. FROM BENTHAM TO DICEY.- 5.1. Jeremy Bentham and the sovereignty of the electoral body.- 5.2. John Austin and the House of Commons as trustee of the electorate.- 5.3. Dicey and the distinction between juridical and political sovereignty I. INTRODUCTION By titling this article 'Sovereignty in British Legal Doctrine' rather than 'The British Doctrine of Sovereignty' I wanted to underline that I am not only going to examine the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty, genuinely British, but also the sovereignty of the people, which is common throughout western juridical and political theory. In reality, it is the juxtaposition between both doctrines of sovereignty that the following pages revolve around, which also address the link between Parliament and Judges or, expressed in a different manner,
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Period Historical Overview
    Restoration period: A Historical Overview • Charles II’s accession in 1660 ending the period known in Latin as ‘Interregnum’ • The arrival of Kingship ended two decades of Civil Wars across Britain • Profound hope was restored among people that peace shall be established. • Yet conflicts in minor measure continued between three kingdoms. • Radical differences in religious and political affiliations continued. • It was also a period of colonial expansion. More facts on Restoration • In the Declaration of Breda(1660) Charles II promised “liberty to tender consciences” (religious toleration) • Act of Uniformity (1662): it required that ministers agree to an Episcopalian form of church government, with Bishops running the Church as opposed to a Presbyterian form run by the congregations’ membership. It excluded both the radical Protestants and Roman Catholics. Charles II tried to overturn this act, but Parliament made it a law in 1663. Those who refused to accept the act came to be called ‘Dissenters’ • The conflicting religious affiliations of these two groups were compounded by the differences between the three kingdoms. • Ireland had a majority of Roman Catholic population; Scotland had a Presbytarian church structure; and England had an Episcopalian church structure. • The Treaty of Dove: A secret alliance Charles II made with Louis IV, the Catholic King of France, for religious toleration and accommodation of Roman Catholics. It sparked off further controversies and conflicts as those that ended his father’s reign and life. Other developments • Glorious Revolution (1688)/(The Blood-less Revolution): The overthrow of the Catholic king, James II, who was replaced by his Protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch husband, William.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Parliament Online
    THE HISTORY OF PARLIAMENT TRUST Review of activities in the year 2011-12 July 2012 - 1 - Objectives and Activities of the History of Parliament Trust The History of Parliament is a major academic project to create a scholarly reference work describing the members, constituencies and activities of the Parliament of England and the United Kingdom. The volumes either published or in preparation cover the House of Commons from 1386 to 1868 and the House of Lords from 1660 to 1832. They are widely regarded as an unparalleled source for British political, social and local history. The volumes consist of detailed studies of elections and electoral politics in each constituency, and of closely researched accounts of the lives of everyone who was elected to Parliament in the period, together with surveys drawing out the themes and discoveries of the research and adding information on the operation of Parliament as an institution. The History has published 21,420 biographies and 2,831 constituency surveys in ten sets of volumes (41 volumes in all). They deal with 1386-1421, 1509-1558, 1558-1603, 1604-29, 1660-1690, 1690-1715, 1715-1754, 1754-1790, 1790-1820 and 1820-32. All of these volumes save those most recently published (1604-29) are now available on www.historyofparliamentonline.org . The History’s staff of professional historians is currently researching the House of Commons in the periods 1422-1504, 1640-1660, and 1832-1868, and the House of Lords in the periods 1603-60 and 1660-1832. The three Commons projects currently in progress will contain a further 7,251 biographies of members of the House of Commons and 861 constituency surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism In
    QUIA EMPTORES, SUBINFEUDATION, AND THE DECLINE OF FEUDALISM IN MEDIEVAL ENGLAND: FEUDALISM, IT IS YOUR COUNT THAT VOTES Michael D. Garofalo Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2017 APPROVED: Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Chair Laura Stern, Committee Member Mickey Abel, Minor Professor Harold Tanner, Chair of the Department of History David Holdeman, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Victor Prybutok, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Garofalo, Michael D. Quia Emptores, Subinfeudation, and the Decline of Feudalism in Medieval England: Feudalism, it is Your Count that Votes. Master of Science (History), August 2017, 123 pp., bibliography, 121 titles. The focus of this thesis is threefold. First, Edward I enacted the Statute of Westminster III, Quia Emptores in 1290, at the insistence of his leading barons. Secondly, there were precedents for the king of England doing something against his will. Finally, there were unintended consequences once parliament passed this statute. The passage of the statute effectively outlawed subinfeudation in all fee simple estates. It also detailed how land was able to be transferred from one possessor to another. Prior to this statute being signed into law, a lord owed the King feudal incidences, which are fees or services of various types, paid by each property holder. In some cases, these fees were due in the form of knights and fighting soldiers along with the weapons and armor to support them. The number of these knights owed depended on the amount of land held. Lords in many cases would transfer land to another person and that person would now owe the feudal incidences to his new lord, not the original one.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of England
    THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND FBOM THE ACCESSION OF JAMES THE SECOND. THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY. LEIPZIG BERNHARD TAUOHNITZ 1849 . |1848] Digitized 6y Google CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME. CHAPTER TV. FACE Dhath of Charles the Second . 1 ' Suspicions of Poison ........ 1 13 Speech of James the Second to Ihe Privy Council ! . Tijj James proclaimed . jfl State of the Administration ........ 18 Wew Arrangements .......... 19 Sir (ieorge Jeffreys ......... I 12 The Revenue collected without an Act of Parliament ... 26 A Parliament called ; Transactions between James and the French~ fting » » » § , » « 1 . 28 Feelings of the Continental Governments towards ! ] 35 England ~ Policy of the Court ol Rome I i ^ ; 37 Stiuggle in the Mind of James . 00 P ublic Celebration of the Roman Catholjg Rites in the PaU ce 43 His Coronation Enthusiasm of the Tories’ Addresses ...... 47 The Elections aa Proceedings against Oates ........ S3 Proceedings against Dangerfleld ....... 59 Proceedings against Baiter ........ 01 Meeting of the Parliament of Scotland ...... 65 Feeling of James towards the Puriuns ...... 67 Cruel Treatment of the Scotch Covenanters ..... Gft Digitized by Google VI CONTENTS. PACK William Penn 1« Peculiar Favour shown to Roman Catholics and Quakers 19 Meeting of the English Parliament .... • • • 81 Trevor chosen Speaker: Character of Seymour • • • 82 The King’s Speech to the Parliament • • • 84 Debate in the Commons: Speech of Seymour 85 The Revenue voted: Proceedings of the Commons concerning Religion . 81 Additional Taxes voted; Sir Dudley North • • • 88 Proceedings of the Lords • • • 91 Bill for reversing the Attainder of SlaiTord • • • 92 Whig Refugees on the Continent • • 94 Their Correspondents in England . • • 95 - Characters of the Leading Refugees; Ayloffe • • • 90 •** Wade; Goodenougb '• 91 - Rnmhold .......
    [Show full text]
  • The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: a Critical Inquiry, 26 La
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 26 | Number 4 June 1966 The rB itish Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry Roy Stone de Montpensier Repository Citation Roy Stone de Montpensier, The British Doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Critical Inquiry, 26 La. L. Rev. (1966) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol26/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BRITISH DOCTRINE OF PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY: A CRITICAL INQUIRY Roy Stone de Montpensier The purport of this argument is that Dicey and other legal positivists, Austin and Bentham among them, have propounded a spurious doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty because they have uncritically accepted a mistake of Blackstone, who in turn has mistakenly construed Coke's remarks on the nature and analysis of sovereignty, or better, the supremacy, of the High Court of Parliament. The law as a whole is a calculus,' self-contained and self- explanatory, like a circle within which in geometry it is possible to trace the delineaments of the two-dimensional plane con- tained within the circle, as Waissman explains in his Essay on Language Strata; or like language which is also like a circle - that is, as Dr. Johnson explains, a lexicographer sees language by giving definitions of words by reference to other words, and those words by other words, so that in the end words like buck and doe, female and male, he and she, are tautologous in the sense that the one has to refer to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • PART I PAPER 3 BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY, 1050-C. 1500 2017-2018
    PART I PAPER 3 BRITISH POLITICAL HISTORY, 1050-­­c. 1500 2017-­­2018 READING LIST FOR STUDENTS & SUPERVISORS Edward I. Memoranda roll, E368/69m (1297-­­98) Bibliography and Reference 1050 -­­ 1509 ........................................................................... 5 Abbreviations used ................................................................................................................................ 5 A. The Conquest and the Normans: Anglo-­­Norman England 1050-­­1154 ................... 44 General and introductory .................................................................................................................. 44 Sources .................................................................................................................................................... 44 The Conquest of Anglo-•­Saxon England ........................................................................................... 45 England and Normandy ...................................................................................................................... 45 Kings and kingship .............................................................................................................................. 46 Kingship: ideas and practices ........................................................................................................... 46 King William I ..................................................................................................................................... 46 King William Rufus ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • James I and British Identity: the Development of a British Identity from 1542-1689
    DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal Volume 2 Article 2 2014 James I and British Identity: The Development of a British Identity from 1542-1689 Zachary A. Bates Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery Part of the Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Bates, Zachary A. (2014) "James I and British Identity: The Development of a British Identity from 1542-1689," DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal: Vol. 2 , Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31922/disc2.2 Available at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. James I and British Identity: The Development of a British Identity from 1542-1689 Cover Page Footnote I would like to thank Dr. Jacob Selwood for inspiring and guiding this article. This article is available in DISCOVERY: Georgia State Honors College Undergraduate Research Journal: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/discovery/vol2/iss1/2 ! The creation of the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707, which unified the kingdoms of Scotland and England into a single political unit, was the result of an Act and of current political circumstances. It was also, however, a culmination of over two centuries of proposed unions and of a merging British identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Stuart Parliaments
    STUART PARLIAMENTS General 5063. Abel, Deryck. "Liberty v. authority in Stuart England." Contemporary Review 165 (Jan.-June 1944): 47-52. 5064. Aylmer, G. E. "Place bills and the separation of powers: some seventeenth-century origins of the 'non- political' civil service." Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 5th ser., 15 (1965): 45-69. 5065. Bennett, Edward Earl. "Parliament and the colonies to 1715." Ph.D., University of Wisconsin, 1925. 5066. Bowdoin, James. "Ms. journals of the Long, Little, &c. Parliaments." Collections of the Massachusetts Historical Society 3rd ser., 2 (1830): 323-64. [A detailed study of the manuscript copy of the Commons Journals 1650-1677 held by the New York Historical Society.] 5067. Braddick, M. J. "Parliamentary lay taxation, c. 1590-1670: local problems of enforcement and collection, with special reference to Norfolk." Ph.D., University of Cambridge, 1988. 5068. ---. Parliamentary taxation in seventeenth-century England: local administration and response. Woodbridge: Royal Historical Society, 1994. 353p. 5069. Brown, Keith M. "The origins of a British aristocracy: integration and its limitations before the Treaty of Union." In Conquest and Union: fashioning a British state, 1485-1725, edited by Steven G. Ellis and Sarah Barber: 222-49. London: Longman, 1995. 5070. Cherry, George L. Early English liberalism: its emergence through parliamentary action, 1660-1702. New York: Bookman Associates, 1962. 325p. 5071. "A compleat collection of all the remarkable speeches in both Houses of Parliament: discovering the principles and temper of all parties and factions; the conduct of our chief ministers, their management of public affairs, and the maxims of government, from the year 1641, to the happy union of Great Britain.
    [Show full text]