The Political and Social Satire of Thomas Love Peacock

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Political and Social Satire of Thomas Love Peacock THE POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SATIRE OF THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK A THESIS submitted in partial fulfilment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS by JEAN ALICE GOULD LUMSDEN Montreal 1944 INDEX INTRODUCTION. Page 10 CHAPTER I. ARTS AND LETTERS. Page ZZ* CHAPTER II. RELIGION. Page 45. CHAPTER III. EDUCATION. Page 61. CHAPTER IV. POLITICS AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS. Page 72. CHAPTER V. RACIAL PREJUDICES. Page 102. CONCLUSION. Page 115. INTRODUCTION Thomas Love Peacock was born at Weymouth in October, 1785. His father was Samuel Peacock, a glass-merchant, carry­ ing on his trade in St. Paul's Churchyard. Nothing of any interest seems to be known of his family or himself. That he was in business in 1768 is certain, for many years later his son, Thomas, wrote the rough copy of a.farce, The Three Doc­ tors, on the blank pages of an old account book, whose cover was marked with the words "Day Book: 1768: Saml. Peacock". One of these pages indicates that Peacock, the author, was one day suffering from an attack of indolence or distraction, or that he had momentarily lost the urge to write. It is covered with scrawls of all sorts, capital letters, curves and other marks which make little or no sense. In the cor­ ner of the left margin, however, there is inscribed: "T. L. Peacock - 1811 1768 n ~45 " This not only furnishes evidence that The Three Doctors was written in 1811, but also contains what is probably the second- best autograph to be found in the manuscripts. One may pre­ sume that Samuel Peacock was still in business in 1785, for at the end of that year his son was baptised in London. About three years later the father died. 1 A. M. Freeman. Thomas Love Peacock (London: Martin Seeker, 1911) p. 130. 2 The mother of Peacock was Sarah, daughter of Thomas Love, a naval captain. She survived her husband by thirty- five years, and was, throughout that comparatively long time, her sonfs best and most intimate friend. f,He loved her", says the writer of an article in the North British Review, written just after Peacock's death, "with a love beyond that of common natures". Her loss affected him more profoundly than any other event of his life. So strong was her influence upon him that he consulted her judgment in all that he wrote, and it is recorded that some time after her death he remarked to a friend that he had never written with any zeal since. From then on he wrote very little that was of any length, but was inclined to restrict himself largely to magazine articles. Many of the fragmentary beginnings of satires and romances belong to that period, and it was very likely owing to the want of her encouragement that they were left unfinished. After the death of his father, Peacock and his mother went to live with her father in Chertsey. It was here that the boy no doubt heard daily talk of the sea, not only from Captain Love, his grandfather, but from his mother as well, whose brother and nephew were also in the navy. Letters from them must have been fairly frequent, affording the most interesting and welcome topic of conversation. These 3 letters gave rise to questions by his mother and explanations by his grandfather, constituting his early education in mari­ time affairs. Thus the environment of his early years, to which was added the influence of heredity, produced in Pea­ cock a keen interest in every form of seamanship, a passion for which he provided an outlet at all times of his life, taking advantage of whatever scope and vehicle chance threw in his path. While in his grandfather's company at Chertsey, Pea­ cock must have been entertained with many an unusual anec­ dote from the store of the old man's experience. It may safely be assumed that these stories had a considerable inf­ luence on the tastes and abilities developed in his maturer years. If we are to believe the authorities, he may be said to have begun to collect material for his novels at the age of three. As was natural for a boy of his age, he quite likely accepted as true certain fanciful statements which passed as facts of natural history. These took firm root in his impressionable mind, and later he incorporated them in a satirical romance. The original of Captain Hawltaught in Mellncourt is none other than Captain Love, Peacockfs grandfather. He certainly did not make much use, however, of what must have been unusually rich opportunities. The account of the old captain is vivid enough, but it is 4 remarkable only as an "in memoriam", thus giving the im­ pression that the sole motive for inserting it in the novel was the desire to perpetuate his memory. It is related that a dangerous wound compelled the old captain to renounce his ddtoliiigg element, and lay himself up in ordinary for the rest of his days. He retired on half-pay and the produce of his prize-money to a little village in the west of England, where he employed himself very assidu­ ously in planting cabbages and watching the changes of the wind. This description is indeed applicable to Captain Love who, as master of H. M. S. "Prothee", had lost a leg in an action against the French in 1783; but it could also fit scores of retired sailors similarly situated. The clue is to be found farther on: the old captain was fond of his bottle of wine after dinner, and his glass of grog at night. Oran was easily brought to sympathise in this taste; and they have many times sat up together half the night over a flowing bowl, the old captain singing "Rule Britannia", "True Courage", or "Tom Tough", and Oran accompanying him on the French horn . The old captain used to say that grog was the elixir of life; but it did not prove so to him; for one night he tossed off his last bumper, sang his last stave, and heard the last flourish of his Oran's horn. 2 Herein the captain is chiefly remarkable for his devotion to the bottle, a feature which in itself does not distinguish him from a multitude of others; while it is altogether un­ likely that Peacock inserted him in one of his novels merely to 2 T. L. Peacock, Melincourt (London: George Newnes, Ltd., 1903) chap. VI. 5 commemorate his habitual intemperance. The important thing to note is that it was Captain Hawltaught who introduced Oran to Forester: "During a summer tour in Devonshire, I called upon my old friend Captain Hawltaught, and was intro­ duced to Mr. Oran;"3 and if we bear in mind the fact that he represents Peacock in the novel, just as Captain Hawltaught means Captain Love, it is not difficult to see in the two pages of the novel in which he appears,an indirect acknow­ ledgement of the fact that Captain Love made Peacock acquaint­ ed with the sailors' tales and legends about Oran. In any event, Captain Hawltaught is not necessary either to the story, the theories, or the satire, and is brought in merely because he first introduced Oran to civilisation and to Mr. Forester. Peacock's life may well be compared with the course of a remote and lonel3r stream, approachable only at certain points, the greater part of its channel being hidden in impen­ etrable mystery. He was much too reticent to write anything about himself which might create amusement for the critics or delight for posterity. Yet in Some Recollections of Childhood. written when he was about fifty, there are recorded some of his impressions at the beginning of his school-days. A descrip­ tive sketch called The Last Day of Windsor Forest is another of his finished writings which may be considered remarkable as 3 loc. cit. 6 being ostensibly autobiographical, though even here his utterances are not absolutely personal and intimate. His recollections are hot so much of his own childhood as child­ ish memories of other people and external things. One small chapter of the Recollections concerned some of those early impressions which he later reproduced in his novels. His description of the Abbey House, together with its gardens, at once brings the reader into the familiar atmosphere, reminding him of the introductory chapter to either Headlong Hall or Nightmare Abbey. There is no mistaking the style: the house had been built near the site of those ancient abbeys, whose demesnes the pure devotion of Henry Till transferred from their former occupants (who foolishly imagined they had a right to them, though they lacked the might which is its essence) to the members of his convenient parliamentary chorus, who helped him to run down his Scotch octave of wives. * At the back of the house was a dark grove of trees. To Peacock, aged seven, this grove had a mysterious appearance, and one day he was enraptured to discover that it contained a ghost. The news was communicated and the whole house assembled to investi­ gate the scene of the apparition. No ghost, however, was found. A tall lily, growing just beyond the trees, was gently swaying to and fro in the wind, so that from the point where the child had stood it was alternately visible and hidden. Another incident recorded by Peacock was actually 4 A. M. Freeman, op. cit., p. 25. 7 reproduced in one of his novels. Charles, the son of the house, had been confined to his room for being impolite to an elderly relative; I found him in his chamber [says PeacockJ sitting by the fire with a pile of ghostly tales, and an accumulation of lead which he was casting into dumps in a mould .
Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts THE SATIRIC NOVEL FROM FIELDING TO HOGG A Dissertation in English by Julian Fung © 2015 Julian Fung Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2015 ii The dissertation of Julian Fung was reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert D. Hume Evan Pugh Professor of English Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee John T. Harwood Associate Professor of English and Information Sciences and Technology Philip Jenkins Edwin Erle Sparks Professor Emeritus of the Humanities Nicholas A. Joukovsky Professor of English Debra Hawhee Professor of English and Communication Arts and Sciences Director of Graduate Studies *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT This dissertation is an overview of the British novel c. 1740–1830 from the perspective of a scholar interested in narrative satire. Many of the major novels in this period were considered by contemporary readers to be satires or at least to contain strong satiric elements, yet few scholars have attempted to explain how these novels use satire. Critics of individual novelists have, to varying degrees, treated their subjects as satirists—Smollett is frequently read as a satirist, as is Peacock. But these studies often do not give a sense of the sheer variety and diversity of this period’s novelistic satire. Though many works were thought to be satiric, they use satire in vastly different ways for various purposes. How much of a relationship exists between the satire of Smollett, Burney, and Bage, for instance? These novelists all write works containing satire, but they diverge in both tone and aim.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Grin of the Skull Beneath the Skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English English, Department of 12-2011 “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature Amanda D. Drake University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Drake, Amanda D., "“The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature" (2011). Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English. 57. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss/57 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature by Amanda D. Drake A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy English Nineteenth-Century Studies Under the Supervision of Professor Stephen Behrendt Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2011 “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” 1 Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature Amanda D. Drake, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Advisor: Dr. Stephen Behrendt Neither representative of aesthetic flaws or mere comic relief, comic characters within Gothic narratives challenge and redefine the genre in ways that open up, rather than confuse, critical avenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Headlong Hall. - Nightmare Abbey
    - < Headlong Hall. - Nightmare Abbey. Introd. by P.M. Yarker. ~ eBook Headlong Hall. - Nightmare Abbey. Introd. by P.M. Yarker. Dent - Full text of to fiction Description: - -Headlong Hall. - Nightmare Abbey. Introd. by P.M. Yarker. - v. no 1. Mémoires de lInstitut mauritanien de la recherche scientifique, Section Préhistoire ; Mudhakkirā t al-Maʻhad al-Mū rı̄tā nı̄ lil-Buhụ̄ th al-ʻIlmı̄yah, Qism Mā Qabla al-Tā rı̄kh v. no 1 = Mémoires de lInstitut mauritanien de la recherche scientifique, Section Préhistoire ; Everyman]s library, no. 327Headlong Hall. - Nightmare Abbey. Introd. by P.M. Yarker. Notes: Includes bibliography. This edition was published in 1963 Filesize: 31.310 MB Tags: #Full #text #of #Year #S #Work #In #English #Studies #Volume #XXXIV The Entire ebook collection Reynolds emphasizes the unity of the poem, and believes that the Germanic material, because of the continued connexions with the Continent which archaeology shows to have existed, could have arrived in this country long after the date of the settlement. Full text of to fiction ~ 8037 Conscience, Liberty of. History of California and Oregon. In Marginalia in the Vercelli Book an excerpt from Psalm xxvi. Headlong Hall ; Nightmare Abbey ; Maid Marian ; Crotchet Castle : Peacock, Thomas Love, 1785 Boswell in search of a wife, 1766-1769. Hammond C History of Lawrence acad. Nightmare Abbey 1818 Earl of Essex ; Medea; Boadicea ; Orphan of China. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Full text of Year S Work In English Studies Volume XXXIV I128 Reasons for new ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Peacock's Maid Marian: a Humorist's Treatment of Traditional Materials
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Plan B Papers Student Theses & Publications 1-1-1967 Thomas Peacock's Maid Marian: A Humorist's Treatment of Traditional Materials Ronald D. Snead Follow this and additional works at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/plan_b Recommended Citation Snead, Ronald D., "Thomas Peacock's Maid Marian: A Humorist's Treatment of Traditional Materials" (1967). Plan B Papers. 542. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/plan_b/542 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Plan B Papers by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas fea~ock's Maid Marian: A Humorist 's Treatment of raditional Materials (TITLE) BY Ronala L. Snesd PLAN B PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN EDUCATION AND PREPARED IN COURSE English 5e5 IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 1966-67 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS PLAN B PAPER BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE DEGREE, M.S. IN ED . '" °()$.( . , ( 'f DATE te7 DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD Thomas Love Peacock is a little knovm but delightful nineteenth century English author . His seven works·- Headlong Hall (1815), Melincourt (1817), Hightmare Abbey (1818), Ma id Marian ( 1822), The Misfortun.es of Elphin (1829), Crochet Castle (1831), and Gryll Grange (1860 ) -- 1 Ian Jack calls satiric tales. Traditionally, these works have been referred to as novels end would qualify under Thrall and Hibbard 1 s handbook definition of a novel as any extended piece of prose fiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Southey Poems Pdf
    Robert southey poems pdf Continue For the chairman of the Australian Ballet, see Robert Southee (businessman). This article needs additional quotes to verify. Please help improve this article by adding quotes to reliable sources. Non-sources of materials can be challenged and removed. Find sources: Robert Southee - news newspaper book scientist JSTOR (August 2018) (Learn, how and when to remove this template message) Robert SoutheyPortrait, c. 1795Born (1774-08-12)12 August 1774Bristole, EnglandDied21 March 1843 (1843-03-21) (age 68)London, EnglandOccupationPoet, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, historian, biographer, essayistLiter movementRoantisisspehit Fricker (1795-1838; her death)Carolina Ann Bowles (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (1839-1843; his death) Robert Southee (183 /ˈsaʊði/ or /ˈsʌði/; August 12, 1774 -March 21, 1843) was an English romantic poet and poet laureate from 1813 until his death. Like other lake poets, William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Southee began as a radical but became steadily more conservative as he gained respect for Britain and its institutions. Other romantics, notably Byron, accused him of siding with the institution for money and status. He is remembered as the author of the poem After Blenheim and the original version of Goldilocks and the Three Bears. Life Robert Southey, Sir Francis Chantrey, 1832, National Portrait Gallery, London Robert Southee was born in Wine Street, Bristol, Robert Southey and Margaret Hill. He was educated at Westminster School in London (where he was expelled for writing an article in The Flagellant, attributing the invention to the devil), and at Balliol College, Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Surface: the Danish Gothic of B.S. Ingemann, H.C
    Reading the Surface: The Danish Gothic of B.S. Ingemann, H.C. Andersen, Karen Blixen and Beyond Kirstine Marie Kastbjerg A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee: Marianne Stecher. Chair Jan Sjaavik Marshall Brown Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Scandinavian Studies ©Copyright 2013 Kirstine Marie Kastbjerg Parts of chapter 7 are reprinted by permission of the publishers from “The Aesthetics of Surface: the Danish Gothic 1820-2000,” in Gothic Topographies ed. P.M. Mehtonen and Matti Savolainen (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 153–167. Copyright © 2013 University of Washington Abstract Reading the Surface: The Danish Gothic of B.S. Ingemann, H.C. Andersen, Karen Blixen and Beyond Kirstine Marie Kastbjerg Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor in Danish Studies Marianne Stecher Department of Scandinavian Studies Despite growing ubiquitous in both the popular and academic mind in recent years, the Gothic has, perhaps not surprisingly, yet to be examined within the notoriously realism-prone literary canon of Denmark. This dissertation fills that void by demonstrating an ongoing negotiation of Gothic conventions in select works by canonical Danish writers such as B.S. Ingemann, Hans Christian Andersen, and Karen Blixen (Isak Dinesen), as well as contemporary writers such as Peter Høeg and Leonora Christina Skov. This examination does not only broaden our understanding of these culturally significant writers and the discourses they write within and against, it also adds to our understanding of the Gothic – an infamously malleable and indefinable literary mode – by redirecting attention to a central feature of the Gothic that has not received much critical attention: the emphasis on excess, spectacle, clichéd conventions, histrionic performances, its hyperbolic rhetorical style, and hyper-visual theatricality.
    [Show full text]
  • THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK by Tony Reeve
    THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK By Tony Reeve Thomas Love Peacock became a resident of Marlow in the summer of 1815 and had a house there until July 1819, a period of four years. During this time, he is best known as a friend and neighbour of the poet, Percy Bysshe Shelley and his wife, Mary Shelley, the author of Frankenstein, when they also lived in Marlow. Yet, in many ways, it is difficult to understand why they should have been friends. For example, Peacock was seven years older than Shelley, being born on 18 October 1785 at Weymouth in Dorset, the son of a London glass merchant. His father died in 1794 when Peacock was only 8 years of age, but in preparation for his death, his father purchased three annuities, which failed Thomas Love Peacock many years early. As a result, Peacock had to leave school at eleven years of age and take a job as a lowly clerk in the City of London. He had no secondary education at all, but was clearly of outstanding intelligence and managed to educate himself. He taught himself Latin, ancient Greek, French and Italian and became an expert on philosophy and the classic writers. Peacock had no expectations of an inheritance; he could not borrow money. When he got into debt, he worried about his bills and did his best to pay tradesmen. He was not a big man, but was slim and narrow-shouldered. He dressed very neatly and conventionally like a clerk, with a hat over a shock of dark hair.
    [Show full text]
  • Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information the cambridge edition of the novels of THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK crotchet castle © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information the cambridge edition of the novels of THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK general editor: Freya Johnston, University of Oxford senior editorial advisor: Nicholas A. Joukovsky, Pennsylvania State University volumes in this series 1. Headlong Hall 2. Melincourt 3. Nightmare Abbey 4. Maid Marian 5. The Misfortunes of Elphin 6. Crotchet Castle 7. Gryll Grange © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information thomas love peacock CROTCHET CASTLE Edited by Freya Johnston and Matthew Bevis © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-03072-5 — Crotchet Castle Thomas Love Peacock , Edited by Freya Johnston , Matthew Bevis Frontmatter More Information University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • 28Th International Congress on Medieval Studies
    Dear Colleague: It is my pleasure to invite you to the Twenty-Eighth International Congress on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo which will convene from May 6-9, 1993 on the campus of Western Michigan University under the sponsorship of WMU's Medieval Institute. I call your attention to two highlights of this year's Congress: the German-American Colloquium on German Medieval History sponsored by the Medieval Academy of America and the German Historical Institute in Washington, and the Symposium on the Theory and Practice of Translation in the Middle Ages organized by Professor Jeanette Beer of Purdue University. We are delighted to welcome the early music ensemble Sequentia back to Kalamazoo and look forward to their performance of Vox Feminae: Music from Medieval Women's Cloisters on Thursday evening. On Friday evening, Eberhard Kummer from Vienna, also on a return visit, will perform songs by the Middle High German songwriter Neidhard, and on Saturday night AAI Productions from New York will present several one-act plays from the 7 Sins / 7 Virtues, a project conceived and directed by Melanie Sutherland. These provocative plays explore the traditional seven deadly sins and the seven cardinal virtues through modem interpretations by AAI's resident playwrights. In addition an exhibit sponsored by the Friends of the Road to Santiago entitled "Celebrating the Holy Year: Santiago, a Saint of Two Worlds/Spanish Sketches--Marking the Millenium" will be on display in the Fetzer Center for the duration of the Congress. Please pay close attention to the following pages which contain important information regarding registration, housing, meals, transportation, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Gryll Grange
    GRYLL GRANGE BY THOMAS LOVE PEACOCK ILLUSTRATED BY F. H. TOWNSEND WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY GEORGE SAINTSBURY Mention MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD. NEW YORK : MACMILLAN & CO. 1896 A II rights resemed INTRODUCTION GR YLL GRANGE, the last and mellowest fruit from Pea­ cock's tree, was, like most mellow fruit, not matured hastily. In saying this I do not refer to the long period-exactly a generation in the conventional sense-which intervened between Crotchet Castle of 1831 and this of 1861. For we know as a matter of fact, from the preface to the 1856 edi­ tion of Meli'ncourt, that Peacock was planning Gryll Grange at a time considerably nearer to, but still some years from, its actual publication. There might perhaps have been room forfear lest .such a proceeding, on the part of a man of seventy-five who was living in retirement, should result in an ill-digested mass of detail, tempered or rather distempered by the grumbling of old age, and exhibiting the marks of failing powers. No anticipation could have been more happily falsified. The advance in good temper of Gryll Grange, even upon Crotchet Castle itself, is denied by no one. The book, though long for its author, is not in the least overloaded; and no signs of failure have ever been detected in it except by those who upbraid the still further severance between the line of Peacock's thought and the line of what is vulgarly accounted 'progress,' and who almost oi,enly impute decay to powers no longer used on their side but against them.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Love Peacock's First Novel, Headlong Hall
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Unstoppable force meets immovable object: Peacock’s Headlong Hall and the autonomy of infrastructure AUTHORS Ewers, C JOURNAL Nineteenth-Century Contexts DEPOSITED IN ORE 09 March 2020 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/120197 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Abstract: Thomas Love Peacock’s first novel, Headlong Hall (1815), investigates the effect of infrastructure at a moment when the concept was first being crystallized. Peacock asks what it means when the “headlong” momentum of large technological systems starts to invade more traditional and immovable structures, such as the manorial hall of Squire Headlong. Peacock’s novels are often regarded as inconclusive; Headlong Hall starts with a debate between the passengers on the Irish mail about progress, and ends with the statu-quo-ite Mr Jenkison stating he cannot tell if humanity is advancing or regressing. This doubtful progress is mirrored by Peacock’s description of the improvements wrought by the mail-coach, with the road to Ireland, in the process of being improved by Thomas Telford, also the subject of a contemporary debate about where the nation was heading. Peacock’s novel is, however, unambiguous in the way it describes what Brian Larkin has called the “politics and poetics” of infrastructure, and the way it has a symbolism and an effect that goes far beyond the purely technical.
    [Show full text]
  • Humor, Characterization, Plot: the Role of Secondary Characters in Late Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Marriage Novels
    Humor, Characterization, Plot: The Role of Secondary Characters in Late Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Marriage Novels Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Katrina M. Peterson, M.A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Clare Simmons, Adviser Leslie Tannenbaum Jill Galvan ABSTRACT Many late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century British novels utilize laughter as a social corrective, but this same laughter hides other messages about women‘s roles. As the genre‘s popularity widened, writers used novels to express opinions that would be eschewed in other, more established and serious genres. My dissertation argues that humor contributes to narrative meaning; as readers laugh at ―minor‖ characters, their laughter discourages specific behaviors, yet it also masks characters‘ important functions within narrative structure. Each chapter examines one type of humor—irony, parody, satire, and wit—along with a secondary female archetype: the matriarch, the old maid, the monster, and the mentor. Traditionally, the importance of laughter has been minimized, and the role of minor characters understudied. My project seeks to redress this imbalance through focusing on humor, secondary characterization, and plot. Chapter One, ―Irony and The Role of the Matriarch,‖ explores the humorous characterizations of Lady Maclaughlan and Miss Jenkyns within Susan Ferrier‘s Marriage (1818) and Elizabeth Gaskell‘s Cranford (1853). These novels share the following remarkable similarities: 1) they use characterization to unify unusually- structured novels; 2) they focus on humorous figures whose contributions to plot are masked by irony; 3) their matriarchal characters are absent for large portions of the stories; and 4) despite their absences, these figures‘ matriarchal power carries strong feminist implications.
    [Show full text]