Readingsample
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Feminism, Nationalism, and War: the ‘Yugoslav Case’ in Feminist Texts Jelena Batinic
Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 3 | Issue 1 Article 1 Nov-2001 Feminism, Nationalism, and War: The ‘Yugoslav Case’ in Feminist Texts Jelena Batinic Recommended Citation Batinic, Jelena (2001). Feminism, Nationalism, and War: The ‘Yugoslav Case’ in Feminist Texts. Journal of International Women's Studies, 3(1), 1-23. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol3/iss1/1 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2001 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Feminism, Nationalism, and War: The ‘Yugoslav Case’ in Feminist Texts By Jelena Batinic Introduction In the last decade, what was known as Yugoslavia disintegrated through a series of wars.1 These wars are known worldwide for their brutality and for the tragic ‘privilege’ of imposing the notion of ‘ethnic cleansing’ to international political discourse. In the Western media, they were often represented as just another phase in everlasting, ancient - even tribal - ethnic tensions, and this representation often merged with an Orientalist discourse of the Balkans.2 The situation in the former Yugoslavia also became central to numerous feminist texts. Different ideological, cultural, and theoretical assumptions, as well as dependence on different sources, influenced the emergence of different feminist approaches and analyses, and initiated debates and divisions among both local and Western feminists. -
Centar Za Ženske Studije Zagreb Jednosemestralni Ženskostudijski
CENTAR ZA ŽENSKE STUDIJE ZAGREB JEDNOSEMESTRALNI ŽENSKOSTUDIJSKI OBRAZOVNI PROGRAM 2020. Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, Žene i socijalna država terminologiju i ženske studije Danijela Dolenec Josipa Lulić Toni Prug Biljana Kašić Petra Rodik Nina Čolović Suzana Kunac Maja Solar Nivedita Majumdar Socioekonomski kontekst suvremenih feminističkih borbi Analitički fokusi feminističkih struja i pravaca Mislav Žitko Ankica Čakardić Jelena Ostojić Biljana Kašić Ana Vilenica Mario Kikaš Karolina Leaković Mia Gonan Toni Prug Lilijana Burcar Nina Čolović Lezbijski studiji Tihana Pupovac Sanja Juras Roberta Nikšić Leonida Kovač Lepa Mlađenović Historija feminizma – lokalno i regionalno u Marina Ivandić globalnom kontekstu Sandra Prlenda Queer studiji Renata Jambrešić Kirin Lina Gonan Chiara Bonfiglioli Natalija Iva Stepanović Maja Solar Nina Čolović Tihana Pupovac Dušan Maljković Reprodukcija, tijelo i režimi patrijarhata Feministička optika kulturno-umjetničkih Lilijana Burcar praksi Ana Vilenica Lea Horvat Jasmina Husanović Josipa Lulić Mia Gonan Sanja Iveković Marta Baradić Sanja Horvatinčić Luka Matić Nikolina Pristaš Vesna Vuković Feministička kritika nasilja Leonida Kovač Valentina Andrašek Katja Praznik Maja Solar Marijana Senjak Feministička kritika nacionalne države i Ivana Radačić kapitalizma Bojana Ivanišević Mario Kikaš Miloš Urošević Maja Gergorić Ivan Tranfić Goran Pavlić Luka Matić Uvod u feminističku epistemologiju, terminologiju i ženske studije Feministički kolektiv: teorija u praksi (radionica) Josipa Lulić Sažetak Ideja superžene koja je osnažena dovoljno da joj ne treba nitko poruka je internalizirane kapitalističke ideologije. Dapače, radi se o kamenu temeljcu na kojemu sustav počiva. U tom je pak slučaju gradnja kolektiva kamen temeljac otpora. Pitanje organizacije i uloge kolektiva javlja se i u raspravama oko političkog organiziranja u feminističkim krugovima, gdje se ponekad javlja rascjep teorije i prakse: naime, puno je lakše govoriti o kolektivu u teoriji nego raditi na praksama koje bi omogućile da kolektiv zaista funkcionira. -
Women's Court – Feminist Approach to Justice Report for the Period January, February, March 2014 We Bring Y
Women’s Court – feminist approach to justice Report for the period January, February, March 2014 We bring you a brief report on the activities of the Women in Black regarding the organization of the Women's Court - Feminist Approach to Justice, in the reporting period. The report is mainly related to the activities implemented in Serbia, as well as to joint activities of partner organizations. Activities implemented in other states of the former Yugoslavia are represented the extent to which Women in Black, as leading organisation in program implementation, obtained information from other members of the Organizing Board of the Women's Court. If you are interested in additional information, you can find them on our websites www.zeneucrnom.org and www.zenskisud.org or by contacting us via email: [email protected] We thank you in advance, in solidarity. At the end of 2010, the members of the Initiative Board (IB): Women to Women, Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina), the Center for Women and Peace Education Anima, Kotor (Montenegro), the Center for Women's Studies and the Center for Women War Victims, Zagreb (Croatia), Women's Network Kosovo, Kosovo, and Women's Studies and Women in black, Belgrade, launched an initiative to organize the Women's Court for the former Yugoslavia. IB now has 10 organizations from all countries of the former Yugoslavia. At a meeting, organized in early February 2013, the Initiative Board has evolved into the Women's Court Organizing Board (OB). In the period covered by this report, the following activities were conducted: I Educational activities – seminars, lectures, public presentations as part of process of organizing the Women’s Court: feminist approach to justice • Public presentations/PP: Public presentations/PP of the initiative to organize the Women's Court, are an integral part of the research and activist process, aiming to gather information and suggestions regarding the concept and vision of justice and the choice of topics of the Women's Court. -
Bojan Aleksov
Bojan Aleksov Senior Lecturer in Modern Southeast European History SSEES, University College London Gower Street WC1E 6BT Tel: +44 20 7679 8868 Fax: +44 20 7679 8777 Email: [email protected] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ssees/people/a-z/bojan-aleksov Education PhD in Comparative History of Central, Southern and Eastern Europe at the Central European University, Budapest (2005), summa cum laude Thesis Title: “Religious Dissent in the Age of Modernization and Nationalism: Nazarenes in Hungary and Serbia 1850-1914” 2000-2001 - Visiting Student - Osteuropa Institut, Freie Universität Berlin MA in Central European History at the Central European University, Budapest (1999) Thesis Title: “The Dynamics of Extinction: The Nazarene Religious Community in Yugoslavia after 1945” B. A. in History, University of Belgrade, Serbia (1998) 2007 - Certificate in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (CLTHE) 1995 - Summer School at L’Institut de Science Politique in Rennes, France Posts, fellowships and research projects 2017 January to June – The Fritz Thyssen Senior Fellowship 2015 - 2018 The Leverhulme Trust - International Network Grant Project Title: A Transnational Approach to Resistance in Europe, 1936-48 Co-PI with Professor Robert Gildea, Oxford University (total funding: £90,886) 2014- 2016 – History Programme Coordinator UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES) 2013- present – Director of the UCL Centre for South-East European Studies 2012 – Visiting Fellow at the Südost-Institut and the Osteuropa-Institut in Regensburg 2011 – PostYugoslav -
Feminists Against Sexual Violence in War: the Question of Perpetrators and Victims Revisited
social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Feminists against Sexual Violence in War: The Question of Perpetrators and Victims Revisited Maja Korac Department of Social Sciences, Cass School of Education and Communities, University of East London, London E16 2RD, UK; [email protected] Received: 26 June 2018; Accepted: 26 September 2018; Published: 30 September 2018 Abstract: This article reflects upon feminist activism and analyses of sexual victimisation of women in war during the 1990s. It critically examines the reasons for the continuation of this type of violence against women, despite its recognition as a war crime; the recognition that marked one of the significant achievements of feminist activism during the last decade of the 20th century. The discussion points to the centrality of sexual violence in war for the system of gender based violence (GBV) against both women and men in war. It argues that a relational understanding of the gendered processes of victimisation in war is critical. This approach enables an acknowledgement that sexual violence in war and rape, as one of its expressions, is a violent political act that is highly gendered both in its causes and consequences, and, as such, it affects both women and men. This article provides an overall argument for the need of feminist scholarship and activism to engage with these differently situated experiences and practices of victimisation in war, to ‘unmake’ it. Keywords: sexual violence against women; sexual violence against men; feminist anti-war activism; de-politicisation of male-on-male sexual violence 1. Introduction I belong to the generation of women, feminist scholars, and activists, who were engaged in efforts to make sexual violence and rape of women in war visible and recognised as a war crime.1 At the time, I felt that all the work, both political and scholarly, compassion and empathy that characterised feminists’ engagement during the 1990s had the ultimate positive impact on the situation of women in war zones. -
Balkan States Published by the U
The Balkan Peninsula is bordered by the Adriatic, Ionian, Aegean, and Black Seas. Image derived from The World Factbook Balkan States published by the U. S. Central Intelligence by Tina Gianoulis Agency. Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com Divided by religious, ethnic, and linguistic differences, the Balkan States have a long history of conflict and conquest. Though the states represent a wide variety of national and ethnic identities, they are all influenced by powerful and conservative religions: Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, and Islam. Add to this the fact that embattled ethnic groups often place a high value on procreation, which is usually identified with heterosexuality, and the difficulties faced by Balkan queer people become apparent. Though many anti-gay laws have been abolished recently, true acceptance is a much longer process, and anti- homosexual violence is still common. However, there are many brave and articulate gay and lesbian activists in the Balkan countries. Many of these activists not only work for gay rights in their own countries, but also reach across centuries-old barriers to form connections with queers of other ethnic groups. Geography The Balkan Peninsula is bordered on the east and west by the Black, Ionian, and Adriatic Seas, and on the north and south by the Aegean Sea and the Sawa and Danube Rivers. Though the peninsula stretches from mainland Greece to Hungary, the term "Balkan states" is most often used to refer to the turbulent nations that were once united under the name Yugoslavia. These ancient lands, recreated as nations in the 1990s when Yugoslavia was dissolved, include Serbia/ Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia/Herzegovina, and Slovenia. -
LGBT Rights, Homonationalisms, Europeanization and Post
Old Ties and New Binds: LGBT Rights, Homonationalisms, Europeanization and Post- War Legacies in Serbia Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sonnet D’Amour Gabbard, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Jennifer Anne Suchland, Advisor Christine Keating Shannon Winnubst Copyrighted by Sonnet D’Amour Gabbard 2017 Abstract My dissertation examines the historic links between the anti-war activists in Serbia with the current efforts and work for LGBT justice and rights. As an interdisciplinary scholar, my work integrates a variety of epistemologies across disciplines by putting anti-war and LGBT activists experience in Serbia into conversation with one another to address unique vulnerabilities. Drawing from transnational feminist and queer critiques of governance, (homo)nationalism, and transnational sexuality studies, I consider how new non- heterosexual identity politics—with roots in anti-war activism—have surfaced in Serbia since the Kosovo War. I argue that it is at the intersection of anti-war and LGBT organizing that new and conflicting identity politics have emerged, in part as a reaction to a pro-war hyper-nationalism and neoliberal globalization. ii Dedication I write this in memory of Jill Benderly, who taught me to be unapologetically me and to fight until my last breath for justice and peace. I love you. I miss you. iii Acknowledgments When I think about the scores of people, creatures, and plant life that have helped me arrive at this journey I am overwhelmed with emotion and humility. -
Our Bodies, Our Location: the Politics of Feminist Translation and Reproduction in Post-Socialist Serbia
Our Bodies, Our Location: The Politics of Feminist Translation and Reproduction in Post-socialist Serbia by Anna Bogic A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Women’s Studies Institute of Feminist and Gender Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Anna Bogic, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... iv Résumé ................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi Dedication ......................................................................................................................... viii Maps of Yugoslavia ............................................................................................................ ix Timeline of Selected Events ............................................................................................... xi Timeline of Feminist Movement in Yugoslavia and Serbia .......................................... xiii Cover of Our Bodies, Ourselves (1992) ............................................................................. xv Cover of Naša tela, mi (2001) .......................................................................................... -
Introduction: the Wars of Yesterday: the Balkan Wars and The
The Wars of Yesterday The Balkan Wars and the Emergence of Modern Military Conflict, 1912/13 An Introduction Katrin Boeckh and Sabine Rutar The Balkan Wars of 1912/13 and their outcomes have shaped much of the military and political thinking of the Balkan elites during the last century. At the same time, these wars were intimations of what was to become the bloodiest, most violent century in Europe’s and indeed humankind’s history. Wars often lead to other wars. Yet this process of contagion happened in a particularly gruesome manner during the twentieth century. In Europe, the Balkan Wars marked the beginning of the twentieth century’s history of warfare. In the First Balkan War (October 1912–May 1913), Serbia, Monte- negro, Greece and Bulgaria declared war on the Ottoman Empire; in the Second Balkan War (June–August 1913), Bulgaria fought Serbia, Montenegro and Greece over the Ottoman territories they had each just gained. From July onwards, Serbia, Montenegro and Greece were supported by Romania, who entered the war hoping to seize the southern Dobruja from Bulgaria. These hopes were realized. Albania, declared an independent state in November 1912, was thus a product of the First Balkan War. The borders of other territories were changed and obtained features that partially remain valid up to the present: the historical region of Macedonia, a main theatre of the wars, was divided among Greece (Aegean Macedonia), Bulgaria (Pirin Macedonia) and Serbia (Vardar Macedonia, corresponding largely to today’s Republic of Macedonia, established in 1991). The Ottoman Empire’s loss of most of its European territories in the conflict was one more warning sign of its inner weakness; it ceased to exist in the aftermath of the First World War, and was succeeded by the Republic of Turkey in 1923. -
Marian Apparitions in Međugorje in the Dissolution of Yugoslavia
1. KorreKtur Marian Apparitions in Međ ugorje in the Dissolution of Yugoslavia Bojan Aleksov In the dusk of 24 June 1981, the day when the Catholic Church celebrates Saint John the Baptist, a group of four girls and two boys ranging in age from twelve to sev- enteen years, announced that they had seen and talked with the Virgin Mary on the Crnica Hill near Međugorje in Herzegovina, Yugoslavia. Soon after, Međugorje be- came one of the world’s major sites of Marian pilgrimages, second only to Lourdes and Fátima. Yet in the chronology that marked the 1980s as a decade of crisis with the breakup of Yugoslavia, the events in Međugorje have remained largely overshadowed by symbolically more recognizable and politically more palpable historical events like Tito’s death in 1980 or the mass protests of the Kosovo Albanians earlier in 1981. In scholarly literature the “apparition” of Gospa (as the Virgin Mary is locally called) was most often interpreted as being provoked by an internal crisis within the Catholic Church.1 This paper however follows the approach of anthropologist E. A. Hammel, who distinguishes at least three levels of inquiry in the Međugorje events – one that focuses on the apparition itself, one that looks at people’s sightings, and one that ex- plores the differing perceptions of these events.2 Focusing on the last level, this paper hopes to contribute to the study of Međugorje’s conflict potential within the context of the Yugoslav crisis in the 1980s by analyzing the various perceptions of the alleged 1 The common belief is that the alleged apparitions have been used by the local Franciscans to chal- lenge the authority of the diocese of Mostar-Duvno to which Međugorje belongs. -
Bojan Aleksov Humboldt Research Fellow Institute of East European Studies Free University Berlin Gary Str
Bojan Aleksov Humboldt Research Fellow Institute of East European Studies Free University Berlin Gary Str. 55 14195 Berlin Private: Novalis Str. 13 10115 Berlin - Mitte Tel.: +49 1773699145 E-mail: >[email protected]< EDUCATION PhD in Comparative History of Central, Southern and Eastern Europe at the Central European University, Budapest (2005), summa cum laude Thesis Title: “Religious Dissent in the Age of Modernization and Nationalism: Nazarenes in Hungary and Serbia 1850-1914” 2000-2001 - Visiting Student - Osteuropa Institut, Freie Universität Berlin MA in Central European History at the Central European University, Budapest (1999) Thesis Title: “The Dynamics of Extinction: The Nazarene Religious Community in Yugoslavia after 1945” B. A. in History, University of Belgrade, Serbia (1998) 1995 - Summer school at L’Institut de Science Politique in Rennes, France FELLOWSHIPS & RESEARCH PROJECTS 2005 - Humboldt Foundation Research Fellowship; Host Institution - Osteuropa Institut, Freie University Berlin 2004 – 2005 “We, the People” Research Fellowship of the Collegium Budapest and Center for Advanced Studies Sofia 2004 – “The Clergy in Modern Europe”, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 2003-2004 – OSI International Policy Fellowship “Religious Education in Public Schools” 2002 – Fellowship of the Georg Eckert Institut für internationale Schulbuchforschung, Braunschweig 2002 – Researcher on the project “Balkan Societies in Change: The Use of Historical Myths”, Institute for History, Sarajevo and University of Oslo 2002 -
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 40 Issue 5 Article 1 7-2020 Frontmatter (Volume 40, Issue 5) Paul B. Mojzes Rosemont College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Mojzes, Paul B. (2020) "Frontmatter (Volume 40, Issue 5)," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40 : Iss. 5 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol40/iss5/1 This Editorial is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Occasional Papers on ISSN 1069-4781 Religion in Eastern Europe Volume XL, No.5 July 2020 REFLECTIONS AFTER THIRTY YEARS LEGAL STATUS OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH INTERDENOMINATIONAL DIALOGUE IN UKRAINE AFTER 1989 ULTIMATE CHALLENGE TO CHRISTIANITY IN POST-YUGOSLAVIA CATHOLICISM IN THE NEW POLAND MACEDONIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH AT THE CROSSORADS Edited by Paul Mojzes Co-edited by Beth Admiraal and H. David Baer OCCASIONAL PAPERS ON RELIGION IN EASTERN EUROPE Vol. XL, No. 5 (July 2020) Paul Mojzes, professor emeritus, Rosemont College, Pennsylvania, Editor-in-Chief Beth Admiraal, King’s College, Pennsylvania, Co-Editor H. David Baer, Texas Lutheran University, Texas, Co-Editor Paul Crego, Washington, D.C., Book Review Editor Alex Rolfe, George Fox University, Oregon, Web Editor Lena Van, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Assistant to the Editor Monica M.