' 1 « ITTCOA Y *// FEDERAL ESISTER

VOLUME 24 ' 4 * . 1 934 NUMBER 104 * i / N n t o ^ Washington, Thursday, May 28, 1959

CREST: Behind and above the eagle CONTENTS Title 3— THE PRESIDENT a radiating glory or, on which appears an arc of thirteen cloud puffs proper, THE PRESIDENT Executive Order 10823 and a constellation of thirteen mullets argent. Executive Order Page COAT OF ARMS, SEAL, AND FLAG The whole surrounded by white stars Coat of Arms, Seal, and Flag of the OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED arranged in the form of an annulet with President of the United States 4293 one point of each star outward on the STATES imaginary radiating center lines, the EXECUTIVE AGENCIES By virtue of the authority vested in me number of stars conforming to the num­ as President of the United States, it is ber of stars in the union of the Flag of Agricultural Marketing Service hereby ordered as follows: the United States as established by chap­ Proposed rule making: ter. 1 of title 4 of the United States Code. Cauliflower for processing; U.S. Section 1. The Coat of Arms of the standards______4306 Sec. 2. The Seal of the President of President of the United States shall be the United States shall consist of the Lamb, yearling mutton, and of the following design: Coat of Arms encircled by the words mutton carcasses; proposed SHIELD: Paleways of thirteen pieces “Seal of the President of the United suspension of Federal meat argent and gules, a chief azure; upon the States.” grading service______4307 breast of an American eagle displayed Rice, rough, brown, and milled; Sec. 3. The Color and Flag of the U.S. standards______4307 holding in his dexter /talon an olive President of the United States shall con­ Rules and regulations: branch and in his sinister a bundle of sist of a dark blue rectangular back­ Milk in New York-New Jersey thirteen arrows all proper, and in his ground of sizes and proportions to con­ milk marketing area; order beak a white scroll inscribed “E PLURI- form to military and naval custom, on suspending certain provision- 4303 BUS UNUM” sable. which shall appear the Coat of Arms of Agricultural Research Service Rules and regulations: THE PRESIDENT’S FLAG Witchweed quarantine; desig­ nation of regulated areas___ 4296 Agriculture Department See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ ice; Agricultural Research Serv­ ice; Commodity Exchange Au­ thority. Atomic Energy Commission Notices: General Dynamics Corp.; issu­ ance of facility export license- 4310 University of Florida; issuance of facility license______4310 Civil Aeronautics Board Notices: Hearings, etc.: Railway Express Agency, Inc- 4311 Transcontinental, S.A______4311 United States Overseas Air­ lines, Inc., et al______4311 Commerce Department See Foreign Commerce Bureau. Commodity Exchange Authority Proposed rule making: Persons to whom trading privi­ leges have been denied or whose registrations have been suspended or revoked; em­ ployment______4307 (Continued on next page) (Continued on p. 4295) 4293 4294 THE PRESIDENT

the President in proper colors. The pro­ Specifications for P resident’s Flag portions of the elements of the Coat of Flag base—blue. Arms shall be in direct relation to the Stars, large and small—white. FEDERALWREGISTER hoist, and the fly shall vary according to Shield: 1934 the customs of the military and naval Chief—light blue. services. Stripes—white and red. Eagle: S ec. 4. The Coat of Arms, Seal, and Wings, body, upper legs—shades of brown. Published daily, except Sundays, Mondays, Color and Flag shall be as described Head, neck, tail—white, shaded gray. and days following official Federal holidays, herein and as set forth in the illustra­ Beak, feet, lower legs—yellow. by the Office of the Federal Register, National tions and specifications which accom­ Talons—dark gray, white high lights. Archives and Records Service, General Serv­ Arrows—white, shaded gray. ices Administration, pursuant to the au­ pany this order and which are hereby Olive branch:' thority contained in the Federal Register Act, made a part thereof. These designs shall Leaves, stem-rshades of green. approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as be used to represent the President of the Olives—light green. amended; 44 U.S.C., ch. 8B), under regula­ United States exclusively. Rays—yellow. tions prescribed by the Administrative Com­ Clouds—white, shaded gray. mittee of the Federal Register, approved by S ec. 5. This order supersedes Execu­ Scroll—white with gray shadows. the President. Distribution is made only by tive Order No. 9646 of October 25, 1945, Letters—black. the Superintendent of Documents, Govern­ and shall become effective on July 4, All dimensions are exclusive of heading and ment Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C. 1959. hems. The Federal R egister will be furnished by D wight D. Eisenhower Device to appear on both sides of flag mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 but will appear reversed on reverse side of per month or $15.00 per year, payable in T he W hite H ouse, flag, except that the motto shall read from advance. The charge for individual copies May 26, 1959. left to right on both sides. (minimum 15 cents) varies in proportion to the size of the issue. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, directly to the Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended August 5, 1953. The Code of F ed­ THE PRESIDENT’S FLAG eral R egulations is sold by the Superin­ tendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements vary. There are no restrictions on the re­ publication of material appearing in the F ederal Register, or the Code op Federal R egulations.

CFR SUPPLEMENTS (As of January 1, 1959)

The following supplements are now * available: Title 7, Parts 53-209, Rev. Jan. 1, 1959 ($5.50) Title 26 (1954), Parts 1-19, Rev. Jan. 1, 1959 ($3.25) Titles 30-31, Rev. Jan. 1, 1959 ($3.50) Titk 32, Parts 1-399 ($1.59)

Previously announced: Title 3, 1958 Supp. ($0.35); Titles 4-5 ($0.50); Title 7, Parts 1-50 ($4.00); Parts 51-52 ($6.25); Parts 900-959 ($1.50); Part 960 to end ($2.25); Title 8 ($0.35); Title 9 ($4.75); Titles 10-13 ($5.50); Title 14, Parts 1-39 ($0.55); Parts 40-399 ($0.55); Part 400 to end ($1.50); Title 16 ($1.75); Title 18 ($0.25); Title 19 ($0.75); Title 21 ($1.00); Titles 22-23 ($0.35); Title 24 ($4.25); Title 25 ($0.35); Title 26, Parts 1-79 ($0.20)^ Parts 80-169 ($0.20); Parts 170-182 ($0.20); Part 300 to end. Title 27 ($0.30); Title 26 (1954) Parts 20-221 ($3.00); Titles 28-29 ($1.50); Title 32, Parts 400-699 ($1.75); Parts 700-799 ($0.70); Part 1100 to end ($0.35); Title 32A ($0.40); Title 33 ($1.50); Titles 35-37 ($1.25); Title 38 ($0.55); V JL I IMKMHM1 O f QCtapM AMID 0 6 0 I f 0 M • J K a M 0 0 T m m Title 39 ($0.70); Titles 40-42 ($0.35); Title 43 a r m m m ($1.00); Titles 44-45 ($0.60); Title 46, Parts 1-145 ($1.00); Parts 146-149, 1958 Supp. 2 JL a - i t m m m * ($1.50); Part 150 to end ($0.50); Title 47, Parts » m m 1-29 ($0.70); Part 30 to end ($0.30); Title 49, Parts 1-70 ($0.25); Paris 71-90 ($0.70); Parts 91-164 ($0.40); Part 165 to end ($1.00); Title 50 ($0.75) Order from Superintendent of Docu­ ments, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D.C Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4295

THE PRESIDENT’S SEAT. CONTENTS— Continued Interior Department Pase See Indian Affairs Bureau; Land Management Bureau; National Park Service. Interstate Commerce Commis­ sion Notices: Fourth section applications for relief______4319 Motor carrier “grandfather” certificate or permit; a p p li­ cations______4318 Motor carrier transfer proceed­ ings______4319 Labor Department See Wage and Hour Division. Land Management Bureau Notices: Arizona; filing of plats of sur­ vey and order providing for opening of public lands (3 documents)—______4308-4310 ; redelegation of author­ ity to chiefs of Mineral and Land Adjudication Sections— 4310 National Park Service Proposed rule making: ^ Zion and Bryce Canyon National Parks; trucking______4305 Securities and Exchange Com­ mission Notices: Hearings, etc. : Brookridge Development Corp__ !______4311 Consolidated Natural Gas Co_ 4311 State Department Rules and regulations: [F.R. Doc. 59-4516; Filed, May 27, 1959; 9:46 a.m.] Participants in International Educational Exchange Pro­ gram; per diem allowances— 4305 CONTENTS— Continued CONTENTS— Continued Wage and Hour Division Farm Credit Administration Page Federal Power Commission Page Notices: Rules and regulations: Notices: Learner employment certifi­ Federal land banks; interest Hearings, etc.: cates; issuance to various rates on loans made through City of Red Bud, 111., et al— 4312 industries______4320 associations______'■__ 4296 Lake Shore Pipe Line Co___ 4313 Federal Aviation Agency Michigan Pipe Line CODIFICATION GUIDE Rules and regulations: Co______4315 4313 A numerical list of the parts of the Code Airworthiness directives; oper­ Midwest Natural Gas Corp_ of Federal-Regulations affected by documents ating restrictions______4304 Shawver-Armour, Inc., et al— 4314 published in this issue. Proposed rules, as Provisional maximum certifi­ Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. et al_ 4315 opposed to final actions, are identified as United Gas Pipe Line Co----- 4314 such. cated weights for certain A Cumulative Codification Guide covering airplanes operated by Alas­ Food and Drug Administration the current month appears at the end of each kan air carriers, Alaskan air Proposed rule making: issue beginning with the second issue of the taxi operators, and Depart­ Farina, enriched; proposal to month. ment of the Interior; special amend standard of identity— 4308 civil air regulation______4304 Foreign Commerce Bureau 3 CFR Page Federal Communications Com­ 'Rules and regulations: Executive orders: mission General licenses; miscellaneous 9646 (supersededby EO10823) _ 4293 Notices: amendments______4305 10823______4293 Hearings, etc.: Health, Education, and Welfare 6 CFR \ DeHart, Richard L., et al___ _ 4317 10— ______4296 FuRer, William Parmer, III, Department et al_____ 4317 See Food and Drug Administra­ 7 CFR tion. nfiCvn broadcast stations fhst 301______- ______4296 o„iranges’ Reposed changes, Indian Affairs Bureau 927______4303 d correction in assign­ Proposed rule making: Proposed rules: ments______4o1R Fort Hall Irrigation Project, 51______4306 ^ ° * e’®?raPh requirements; Idaho; basic and other water 53______4307 exemption of ships______4316 charges______-— 4305 68______4307 4296 RULES AND REGULATIONS The Eugene Brown farm located on the CODIFICATION GUIDE— Con. CODIFICATION GUIDE— Con. east side of a dirt road and 0.9 mile south of the intersection of said road with North Caro­ 14 CFR Pag® 21 CFR page lina Highway No. 211, said intersection being 4a______4304 Proposed rules: 0.1 mile south of Rosendale. 4304 15...... 4308 The R. H. Brown farm located on the east 42______side of North Carolina Highway No. 210, and 43______4304 22 CFR approximately 3.2 mdles north of the junction 45______4304 61______c ______4305 of said highway with North Carolina High­ 507_____ 4304 way No. 53, said junction being 3 miles east 25 CFR of Kelly. 15 CFR Proposed rules: The C. C. Burney farm located on the west 371_____ 4305 221______4305 side of a dirt rpad and 2.2 miles north of Emerson. 17 CFR 36 CFR The Clarence Cain farm located on a farm Proposed rules: Proposed rules: road and 0.5 mile south of the junction of 4307 20— ____ 4305 said road. with United States Highway No. 701, said junction being 1.6 miles east of Elizabethtown. The J. H. Collier farm located on the west side of a paved road and l.O mile south of the junction of said road with the old Clarkton- RULES AND REGULATIONS Elizabethtown road, said junction being 3.8 miles southeast of Elizabethtown. The David Cromartie farm located on the 2), under section 106 of the Federal Plant east side of a farm road 0.5 mile north of the junction of said road with a dirt road, said Title 6— AGRICULTURAL Pest Act (7 U.S.C. 150ee) and sections 8. junction being 1.2 miles west of the junction and 9 df the Plant Quarantine Act of 1bf said road with another dirt road, said CREDIT 1912, as amended (7 U.S.C. 161, 162), junction being 0.2 mile northwest oif the Chapter I— Farm Credit administrative instructions appearing as junction of said road with a paved road, said 7 CFR 301.80-2a are hereby revised to junction being 0.9 mile northeast of Lisbon. Administration read as follows: The W. M. Gurganis farm located on the west side of a paved road and 0.1 mile south­ SUBCHAPTER B— FEDERAL FARM LOAN SYSTEM § 301.80—2a Administrative instructions east'of the intersection of said road with PART 10— FEDERAL LAND BANKS designating regulated areas under another paved road, said intersection being the witchweed quarantine. 1.5 miles southeast of the junction of said GENERALLY road with North Carolina Highway No. 87, : Infestations of the witchweed have said junction being 4.6 miles southeast of Interest Rates on Loans Made been determined to exist, in the quaran­ Elizabethtown. Through Associations tined States, in the civil »divisions and The M. G. Hair farm located on the south premises, or parts thereof, listed below, side of a paved road and 2.4 miles east of the The interest rates on loans made or it has been determined that such in­ junction of said road with North Carolina through national farm loan associations festation is likely to exist therein, or it Highway No. 87, said junction being 7.9 miles on applications taken on and after May is deemed necessary to regulate such lo­ southeast of Elizabethtown. 25, 1959, have been increased as follows : calities because df their proximity to in­ The David Hardison farm located at the From 5 Yz to 5% percent per annum by end of a dirt road and 0.6 mile southeast of the Federal Land Bank of Springfield; festation or their inseparability for the junction of said dirt road with the old from 5 to 51/*» percent per annum by the quarantine enforcement purposes from Clarkton-Elizabethtown road, said junction infested localities. Accordingly, such being 2.5 miles northeast of Clarkton. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul. In or­ civil divisions and premises, and parts The J. C. & P. W. Jessup farm located on der to reflect such changes, § 10.41 of thereof, and all highways and roadways the south side of a paved road and 2.9 miles Title 6 of the Code of Federal Regula­ abutting thereon, are hereby designated east of the junction of said road with North tions, as amended (23 F.R. 2137, 3029, as witchweed regulated areas within the Carolina Highway No. 87, said junction being 6976, 8651; 24 F.R. 845, 2267, 3181, 3559) 7.9 miles southeast of Elizabethtown. is amended by substituting “5%” for meaning of the provisions in this sub- The Aaron Kelly farm located on the part: southeast side of North Carolina Highway “51/2”r in the line with “Springfield” North Carolina therein and by substituting “5%” for No. 53 and approximately 7 miles east of “5” in the line with “St. Paul” therein. Bladen County. That portion of the Kelly where said highway crosses Black River. county lying north and west of a line begin­ The Dexter McKay farm located at the end (Sec. 6, 47 Stat. 14, as amended; 12 U.S.C. ning at the Bladen-Sampson County line and of a farm road and approximately 0.8 na e 665. Interprets or applies secs. 12 “Second”, extending along North Carolina Highway No. south of the junction of said road wi 17(b), 39 Stat. 370, 375, as amended; 12 U.S.C. 41 in a westerly direction to its junction with United States Highway No. 701, said junction 771 “Second”, 831(b) ) United States Highway No. 701, thence along being 2.6 miles east of Elizabethtown. said highway in a westerly and southerly The L. T. McKay farm located on the norm- * R. B. T ootell, direction to its junction with the Bladen- east side of the old Clarkton-Elizabethtown Governor, Columbus County line. roafl and approximately 2.2 miles south Fur pi Qredit Administration. The Acme Wood Corporation Tract located Elizabethtown. ' . n The S. E. McKay Heirs farm located o (F.R. Doc. 59-4484; Filed, May 27, 1959; on the north side of a road and 0.3 mile west 8:49 a.m.] of the junction of said road with a dirt the northeast Side of the old Clark road, said junction being 0.7 mile south of Elizabethtown road and approximate y the intersection of said road with the Lisbon- miles south of Elizabethtown. h Bluefield road, said intersection being 1.8 The Cammy K. Newby farm located on i miles west of Lisbon. southeast side of North Carolina Hig Title 7— AGRICULTURE The Mac L. Barnhill farm located on the No. 53 and approximately 7 miles Chapter III— Agricultural Research east side of North Carolina Highway No. 210, Kelly where said highway crosses Black and approximately 3.2 miles north of the The C. W. Peterson farm located on Service, Department of Agriculture junction of said highway with North Carolina east side of a farm road and 0.3 hwaV [P.P.C. 627, 2d Revision] Highway No. 53, said junction being 3 miles of its junction with North Carolina.US east of Kelly. No. 53, said junction being 1.3 miles PART 301— DOMESTIC QUARANTINE The James Beatty farm located on the west west of Kelly. soUth NOTICES side of a dirt road and approximately 0.8 mile The Floyd Porter farm located on vas north of the junction of said road with North side of a dirt road and 0.3 mile no SUBPART— WITCHWEED of its junction with North Carolina ° . Carolina Highway No. 53, said junction being No. 53, said junction being 0.8 ml Revised Administrative Instructions 2.3 miles northwest of Kelly. west of Kelly. „ , , the Designating Regulated Areas The Lucille Beniomen farmjocated on the The Robert H. Porter farm located ^ west side of a dirt road and approximately 0.8 east side of a dirt road and 2.2 wu Pursuant to § 301.80-2 of the regula­ mile north of the junction of said road with and south of the junction of said^ _ ,unC. tions supplemental to the witchweed North Carolina Highway No. 53, said junction North Carolina Highway No. 53, sai j quarantine (7 CFR, 1957 Supp., 301.80- being 2.3 miles northwest of Kelly. tion-being 0.3 mile northwest of Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4297 The J. R. Powell farm located on the east in the corporate limits of the towns of The A. W. Williamson farm located on the side of a dirt road and 0.5 mile north of the Chadbourn and Cerro Gordo. north side of the Cerro Gordo-Wards High­ junction of said road with another dirt road, The Arthur Baldwin Estate farm located way and 2.1 miles southeast of Cerro Gordo. said junction being 1.7 miles west of the on the north side of United States Highway Cumberland County. The southeast por­ junction of said road with another dirt road, No. 76 at the intersection of said highway tion of the county bounded by a line begin­ said Junction being 0.2 mile northwest of with the Baldwin Woods Road. ning at a point where United States Highway the junction of said road with a paved road, The Johnnie Batton farm located on the No. 301 crosses the Cumberland-Robeson said junction being 0.9 mile northeast of west side of the White Marsh Highway and County line and extending northeast along Lisbon. approximately 5.8 miles north of the junction said highway to its junction with North Car­ The Mary Robeson farnoj located at the of said highway with United States Higliway olina Highway No. 102, thence in a northeast end of a farm road and approximately 0.8 No. 76. direction along said highway to its Junction mile south of the junction of said road with The Beatrice B. Burney farm located on the with the Cumberland-Sampson County line, United States Highway No. 701, said junc­ west side of the White Marsh Highway and thence southeast along said county line to tion being 2.6 miles east of Elizabethtown. approximately 5.8 miles north of the junction its junction with the Cumberland-Bladen The Finley K. Rogers farm located on the of said highway with United States Highway County line, thence west along said county east side of United States Highway No. 701 No. 76. line to its junction with the Cumberland- and approximately 0.7 mile north of the city The James W. Campbell farm located on a Robeson County line, thence northwest along limits of Clarkton. road and 0.4 mile north of its junction with said county line to the point of beginning, The Julian Savage farm located on the a dirt road, said junction being 1.0 mile west excluding the area within the corporate northeast side of a farm road and 0.2 mile of the junction of said dirt road with North­ limits of the City of Fayetteville. southeast of the junction of said road with east Road, said junction being 2.7 miles The G. L. Adcox farm located on the west a dirt road, said junction being 0.8 mile southwest of the intersection of said road side of the Hope Mills-Parkton Road and 1.0 southwest of the junctiori of said road with with the Columbus-Bladen County line. mile south of Hope Mills. North Carolina Highway No. 87, said junction The Leslie Dowles farm located on a dirt The Joseph Black farm located on the south being 9.4 miles southeast of Elizabethtown. road and approximately 0.7 mile west of its side of the Camden Road and 1.1 miles north­ The Harry M. Smith farm located on both Junction with the White Marsh Highway, east of the Cumberland-Hoke County line. sides of a farm road and 0.2 mile southwest said junction being 5.8 miles north of the The D. A. Calhoun farm located on both of the junction of said road with North junction of said highway with United States sides of the Hope Mills-Parkton Road and Carolina Highway No. 53, said junction be­ Highway No. 76. 2.0 miles southwest of Hope Mills. ing 0.8 mile northwest of Kelly. The George W. Elkins farm located at the The Mrs. D. D. Capps farm located on the The Oscar Thompson farm located on the end of a dirt road and 1.0 mile south of its south side of Hope Mills-Rockfish Road and east side of United States Highway No. 701 junction with United States Highway No. approximately 1.5 miles west of Hope Mills. and approximately 0.7 mile north of the city 701, said junction being 3.4 miles northeast The Mrs. Hattie Dixon farm located on the limits of Clarkton. of the junction of said highway with North south side of Hope Mills-Rockfish Road and The R. L. Tippett farm located on the east Carolina Highway No. 131. approximately 1.5 miles west of Hope Mills. side of a dirt road and 1.8 miles west and The Tillman Fairfax farm located on a dirt The D. M. Gaddy farm located on the west south of the junction of said road with North road and 0.2 mile northeast of its junction side of a dirt road and 1.2 miles northwest of Carolina Highway No. 53, said junction being with a second dirt road, said Junction being the junction of said dirt road with North 0.3 mile northwest of Kelly. 0.3 mile south of the. Junction of said second, Carolina Highway No. 102, said junction The Oscar Wright farm located on the dirt road with the Rough and Ready Road, being 2.6 miles east of the Junction of North north side of a paved road and 0.1 mile said Junction being 1.3 miles east of Wards. Carolina Highway No. 102 and United States southwest of the junction of said road with The Christine W. Green farm located on Highway No. 301. North Carolina Highway No. 87, said junc­ a dirt road and 0.3 mile west of its junction The Rufus Gerald farm located on the east tion being 7.9 miles southeast of Elizabeth­ with the Honey Hill Road, said junction be­ side of a dirt road and 0.7 mile northwest town. ing 2.2 miles south of the junction of said of the junction of said dirt road with North The J. F. Yarborough farm located on the road with United States Highway No. 76. Carolina Highway No. 102, said junction being northwest side of a dirt road and 0.4 mile The E. S. Hayes farm located on the west 2.6 miles east of the Junction of North Caro­ west of the junction of said road with an- side of a dirt road and 0.4 mile south of its lina Highway No. 102 and United States other dirt road, said Junction being 0.5 mile junction with the Rough and Ready Road, Highway No. 301. south of Bluefield. said junction being 2.9 miles west of Wards. The J. B. Ingram farm located on the north Columbus County. The area bounded by a The Wiley B. Jacobs farm located on the side of a dirt road and 1.0 mile west of the une beginning at a point where North Caro­ west side of Northeast Road and 2.7 miles junction of said dirt road with the Hope gna Highway No. 131 crosses the Columbus- southwest of the intersection of said road Mills-Parkton Road, said junction being 0.8 aaen County line and extending southeast with the Columbus-Bladen County line. mile northeast of the Cumberland-Robeson along said highway for 0.8 mile to its Junction The Ben Jones farm located pn the south County line. wun a dirt road, thence west along said dirt side of a dirt road and 0.8 mile southeast of The Albert Johnson farm located on the 1111168 to its junction with a the Junction of said road with Chauncey south side of Hope Mills-Rockfish Road and cond dirt road, thence south for 1.1 miles Road, said junction being 2.25 miles north approximately 1.5 miles west of Hope Mills. long said secofid dirt road to its junction of Lake Waccamaw. The George T. Johnson farm located on the D q mu 1>av®d highway, said junction being The Leroy McKee farm located on a dirt east side of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad saicfìì!6 el SÌ.of Mt- olive> thence west along road and approximately 0.7 mile west of its and approximately 2 miles northeast of Hope tion ^Shway for 0.6 mile to its junc- junction with tpe White Marsh Highway, said Mills. said rii>+ a 551 roa<1> thence southwest along junction being 5.8 miles north of the junc­ The W. C. Johnson farm located on both ith r°adior 12 miles to its junction tion of said highway with United States High­ sides of Camden Road and 1.8 miles north­ way No. 76. east of the Cumberland-Hoke County line. southeast ?in Lumberion Highway, thence The Acy Nobles farm located on the east The Mrs. Flossie Jones farm located on the Crossroad* ^ Said hi8hway to Collier’s ChadhmmS’ „thence southwest along the side of a dirt road and 0.6 mile south of its south side of Hope Mills-Rockfish Road and luneticm rnriSfestern Pron£ Highway to its junction with the Rough and Ready Road, approximately 1.5 miles west of Hope Mills. south^alonph ^eacocks Highway, thence said junction being 2.3 miles west of Wards. The James Mason farm located on both With Unitorf e+id highway to its junction The Will Nobles farm located on the north sides of the Camden Road and 2.0 miles West alon^ ,®,tates Highway No. 76, thence side of the Jackson and Daniel Road and 0.2 northeast of the Cumberland-Hoke County a dirt road ®ai.^iShway to its Junction with mile east of Wards. line. of Cerro n !!?* ^unctlon being 2.7 miles west The Graham Patterson farm located on a The Calvin Matthews farm located on the dirt road and approximately 0.3 mile north east side of a dirt road and 0.9 mile north­ road to hÌS?0’ Ìhence south along said dirt of its junction with a second dirt road, said west of the junction of said dirt road with Rough and PoSrtCr^fSr°ads’ thence east along junction being 0.8 mile east of the junction North Carolina Highway No. 102, said junc­ the Cerrn /~.a*y Hoad to its junction with of said second dirt road with the Peacocks- tion being 2.6 miles east of the junction of th*ace south ^ d° 'Cherry Grove Highway, Sidney Highway, said junction being 4.5 miles North Carolina Highway No. 102 and United Grovewove tho«tho«„ 8101180 said highway tovo Cherr-unerr south of Peacocks. States Highway No. 301. HighwavSHighwav No a! 0!11’11 along NorthN orth CarolinCa------The I. A. Singletary farm located on* the The T. E. McDonald farm located on both with a„ Davort9 *.9^ tfi ior *2* 0,80.8 milem ile to itsi ts junctio:j U] east side of United States Highway No. 701 side? of a paved road and 1.0 mile northwest said nnwortnavprtT, ^ highway,“ B thence tnence south alon and 5.9 miles northeast of the junction of of the Junction of said paved road with the North gbway. — ltsits intersection wit said highway with North Carolina Highway United States Highway No. 301, said junc­ Carohna-south Carolina State lim No. 131. tion being 012 mile south of Roslin. thence noSh ina'SoUth Carolina State lir The Minnie D. Tedder farm located on a The Lizzie McDougal farm located on the iaterseS S &1°ng *** State line to dirt road and approximately 0.3 mile north north side of Camden Road and 1.3 miles lowing saJ^ v the Lumber Hiver, then of its junction with a second dirt road, said northeast of the Cumberland-Hoke County with the -m i Ver northeast to its junctit junction being 0.8 mile east of the junction line. thence east^T*6“"00111“ ^ County lir of said second dirt road with the Peacocks- The Mrs. Addie McKinnon farm located on Mat of b L n S n 2 fald county line to Sidney Highway, said junction being 4.5 miles the west side of a dirt road and 0.2 mile hg, including the areas witl south of Peacocks. south of the junction of said dirt road with 4298 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Camden Road, said junction being 1.9 miles of Raeford, thence eastward along the city 401 and 2 miles northeast of the Hoke-Scot­ northeast of the Cumberland-Hoke County limits of Raeford to North Carolina Highway land County line. line. No. 20, thence in a southeast direction along The J. B. Thomas farm located on the west The Howard Perry farm located on the east said highway to its junction with the'Hoke- side of a paved road and 0.7 mile northwest side of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad and Robeson County line, thence southwest and of Silver City. approximately 2 miles northeast of Hope west along said county line to the Lumber The B. H. Thornburg farm located on the Mills. River, thence north along said river to the east- side of a paved road"~and 1.3 miles The J. T. Piner farm located on the west point of beginning. southwest of Montrose. side of United States Highway No. 401 and 0.9 The John Baldwin farm located on the The F. L. Tolar farm located on the north­ mile north of Tokay. north side of North Carolina Highway No. 20 west side of a paved road and 1.4 miles The Wesley Small farm located on the west and 2.2 miles southeast of Dundarrach. northeast of the junction of said paved road side of Black’s Bridge Road and 2.0 miles The Chester Beasley farm located on the with North Carolina Highway No. 20, said southwest of Hope Mills. south ¡fide of a paved road and 0.3 mile junction being 1.7 miles southeast of The Mrs. Dora Smith farm located on the northwest of Sandy Grove, Dundarrach. south side of Hope Mills-Rockfish Road and The W. W. Cameron farm located on both The F. L. Tolar farm (formerly the Charles approximately 1.5 miles west of Hope Mills. sides of a paved road and 0.4 mile southwest V. Baldwin farm) located on the northwest The J. P. Strickland farm located on the of Montrose. side of a paved road and 0.8 mile northeast east side of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad The William Clark farm located on the of the junction of said paved road with and approximately 2 miles northeast'of Hope wèst side of a dirt road and 0.5 mile north of North Carolina Highway No. 20, said junc­ Mills. the junction of said dirt road with Edinburg tion being 1.7 miles southeast of Dundarrach. The Neal A. West farm located on the Road, said junction being 0.8 mile east of The Mrs. B. M. Townsend farm located on south side of Rockfish-Cumberland Road and Edinburg. the north side of a paved road and 0.3 mile 2.0 miles southwest of Cumberland. The Dr. George D. Creed farm located on northeast of the junction of said paved road Duplin County. That area bounded by a the west side of a paved road and 0.9 mile with the road Connecting United States line beginning at a point where North Caro­ north of the junction of said paved road with Highway No. 401 and Rockfish, said junction lina Highway No. 403 intersects United States United States Highway No. 401, said junction being 1.5 miles north of Rockfish. Highway No. 117 and North Carolina High­ being 1.1 miles northeast of the Hoke-Scot­ The W. F. Townsend farm located on the way No. 50 at Faison, thence northeast along land County line. north side of a paved road and 0.1 mile North Carolina Highway No. 403 to its inter­ The J. C. Currie farm located on the west northeast of the junction of said paved road section with the Mount Olive-Summerlin side of a paved road and approximately 3 with the road connecting United States Highway, thence southeast along the Sum- miles south of Buffalo Springs. Highway No. 401 and Rockfish, said junction merlin-Mount Olive Highway to Summerlin, The Marvin Gainey Estate farm located on being 0.4 mile northeast of Rockfish. thence south along a paved road to its Junc­ the west side of a paved road and approxi­ Pender County. The H. S. Black farm lo­ tion with North Carolina Highway No. 11, mately 3 miles south of Buffalo Springs. cated on both sides of a dirt road and 0.1 thence southwest along North Carolina High­ The Marvin Gainey farm (No. 1) located mile northeast of Point Caswell. way No. 11 to its junction with North Caro­ on both sides of a paved road and 1 mile The Alex Calvin farm located on the north lina Highway No. 50, thence northwest along south of Buffalo Springs. side of Currie-Malpass Corner Highway and North Carolina Highway No. 50 to the point The Marvin Gainey^ farm (No. 2) located approximately 1.5 miles southwest of Mal- of beginning, excluding the corporate limits on the east side of a paved road and 1.2 miles pass Corner. of Warsaw, Faison, and Bowden. south of Buffalo Springs. The F. R. Keith farm located at the end The Paisly Bonham farm located on the The Marvin Gainey farm (No. 3) located of a farm road and 1 mile south of the north side of a dirt road and 1.0 mile west of on the west side of a paved road and approxi­ junction of said farm road with North Caro­ Pin Hook. mately 3 miles south of Buffalo Springs. lina Highway No. 210, said junction being The Mike Cavenough farm located on the The Marvin Gainey farm (Nò. 4) located 0.5 mile east of the Intersection of North south side of a dirt road and 2.5 miles south­ on the west side of a paved road and approxi­ Carolina Highway No. 210 and the Bladen- west of Bowden. mately 3 miles south of Buffalo Springs. Pender County line. The C. C. Ivey, Sr., farm located on the The Homer Lesane farm located on the The Maggie Larkins farm located on the east side of a dirt road and 0.5 mile north of north side .of a paved road and 0.2 mile northeast side of a dirt road and 2.6 miles the junction of said dirt road and a paved northwest of Sandy Grove. northwest of the junction of said dirt road road, said junction being 2.0 miles west of The Lessie Little farm located on the east with North Carolina Highway No. 210, said Summerlin. side of a dirt road and 0.3 mile north of the junction being 3 miles.east of the intersection Harnett County. The area bounded by a junction of said dirt road with North Caro­ of North Carolina Highway No. 210 and the line beginning at a point where McLeod lina Highway No. 211, said junction being 1.5 Bladen-Pender County line. Creek crosses the Overhills-Lillington dirt miles west of Raeford. The Hannah Malloy farm located on the road, thence northeast along this road 3.3 The Willford Locklear farm located on the north side of North Carolina Highway No. miles to its intersection with a stone surface northeast side of a paved road and 2 miles 210, and 1.7 miles east of the intersection road, thence southeast along this road to its southeast of the junction of said paved road of said highway with United States Highway intersection with North Carolina State High­ with Rockfish-Dundarrach Road, said junc­ No. 117. way No. 210, thence southwest along this tion being 3 miles southwest of RoCkfish. The Hannah Malloy farm located on the highway to the Harnett-Cumberland County The Elica Love farm located on the east south side of North Carolina Highway No. line, thence west along county line to McLeod side of a paved road and 2.1 miles southeast 210~ and approximately 0.8 mile east of the Creek, thence north along said creek to the of Buffalo Springs. intersection of said highway with United point of beginning. The Mrs. Lena Marley farm located on the States Highway No. 117. The A. J. Coleman farm located on the west side of a paved road and 1 mile south­ The Lawrence Malloy farm located on the east side of North Carolina Highway No. 87 east of the junction of said paved road with south side of North Carolina Highway No- and 0.9 mile south of Olivia. the Dundarrach-Sandy Grove Road* said 210 and approximately 0.8 mile east of th The David Ferrell farm located on the west junction being 2.4 miles northeast of intersection of said highway with United side of a dirt road and approximately 0.8 mile Dundarrach. States Highway No. 117. ,h northwest of Johnsonville. The Margaret McDiamond Estate located The W. H. Malloy farm located on the soutn The Howard McGregor farm located" on the on the south side of United States Highway side of North Carolina Highway No. 210 an east side of North Carolina Highway No. 210 No. 401A and 0.3 mile east of Raeford. approximately 0.8 mile east of the and 1.1 miles northeast of the Harnett-Cum­ The N. A. McKiethan farm located on the tion of said highway with United Sta berland County line. south side of a paved road and 1.7 miles Highway No. 117. ' . The Hillman Grove Baptist Church located southeast of the junction of said paved road The Mrs. W. H. Malloy & Heirs farm lo­ on the west side of a paved road and -0.8 with the Rockfish-Dundarrach Road, said cated on the south side of North Caro mile southwest of Johnsonville. junction being 3*miles southwest of Rockfish. Highway No. 210 and approximately^).» The C. T. Jackson farm located on the west The Z. V. Pate, Inc. (Edwin Pate, Jr.) east of the intersection of said highway side of a dirt road and approximately 0.8 farm located on the south side of the Dun­ United States Highway No. 117. , darrach-Sandy Grove Road and 1.5 miles The Jack Murphy farm located at tn mile northwest of Johnsonville. east of Dundarrach. of a farm road and 0.5 mile northwes The. Ray Thomas farm located on the east The Mary Powers farm located on the north the junction of said farm road vn side of a paved road and 1.4 miles southwest side of a paved road and 0.5 mile west of Currie-Malpass Corner Highway, sai?J1oass of Johnsonville. Edinburg. tion being 1.4 miles southwest of MWi' The M. J. Yarborough farm located on the The James Stephens farm located on the Corner. , , nn the west side of a dirt road and approximately The Standberry Scott farm located on 0.8 mile northwest of Johnsonville! east side of a paved road and 1.7 miles north Hoke County. The southern portion of the of the junction of said paved road with south side of North Carolina Highway ^ g county bounded by a line beginning at a United States Highway No. 401, said junc­ 210 and approximately 0.8 mile eas ^ point wherp the Laurlnburg and Southern tion being 1.1 miles northeast of the Hoke- intersection of said highway with Railroad crosses the Hoke-Scotland County Scotland County line. States Highway No. 117. nortb line and extending northeast along said The Aggie Stubbs farm located on the The D. F. Rowe farm located on hffay railroad to its junction with the city limits southeast side of United States Highway No. side of the Currie-Malpass Corner Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4299 and approximately 1.5 miles southwest of The David Kenan farm located on the Dillon County. All of Dillon County. Malpass Corner. south side of a dirt road and 2.8 miles east Florence County. The Leroy E. Carter The Katy Shaw farm located on the east of Clear Run. farms located on a dirt road and approxi­ side of Holly Shelter Road and 3.6 miles north The Roy Merrit farm located on the east mately 1 mile south of the Junction of said of the junction of said road and North Caro­ side of Turkey-Ingold Highway and 4.4 miles dirt road with a second dirt road at Jeffries lina Highway No. 210, said junction being south of Turkey. Creek, said junction being 1.5 miles north­ 1.1 miles northeast of the point where North The Regal Paper Company farm located on east of the junction of the said second dirt Carolina Highway No. 210 crosses the north­ the west side of a dirt road and 50 yards road and South Carolina Secondary Highway east Cape Fear River. south of the intersection of said dirt road No. 57, said junction being 2 miles southeast The John Williams and Heirs farm located and the Sampson-Duplin County line, said of Claussen. on the east side of the Holly Shelter Road intersection being 3 miles due north of a The Mary Coker farm located on the west and 2.7 miles north of the junction of said point where said county line crosses North side of South Carolina Secondary Highway road and North Carolina Highway No. 210, Carolina Highway No. 24. No. 89 and approximately 1.5 miles north of said junction being 1.1 miles northeast of The Ruth W. Smith farm located on the the junction of South Carolina Secondary the point where North Carolina Highway No. southwest side of a dirt road and approxi­ Highway No. 89 and United States Highway 210 crosses the northeast Cape Fear River. mately 0.5 mile northwest of the intersection No. 301. ■ Richmond County. The A. M. Wadell farm of said dirt road and Turkey-Ingold Highway, The Alma S- Edgerton farm located on the located on the northeast side of a dirt road said intersection being 3 miles south of west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ and 1 mile east of the intersection of said Turkey. way No. 89 and approximately 1.5 miles north dirt road with United States Highway No. 1, The W. C. Smith farm located on the north of the Junction of South Carolina Secondary said intersection being 1.2 miles southwest of side of a dirt road and 0.6 mile northwest of Highway No. 89 and United States Highway Diggs. the intersection of said dirt road with Tur­ No. 301. Robeson County. All of Robeson County. key-Ingold Highway, said intersection being The Juanita S. Floyd farm (formerly the Sampson County. That area bounded by 3 miles south of Turkey. Julian Dusenbury farm) located on the north a line beginning at a point where United Scotland County. The portion of the side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile northeast States Highway No. 701 crosses the Bladen- county lying east of United States Highway of the junction of said dirt road with South Sampson County, line, thence northwest No. 15, excluding the area within the corpo­ Carolina Secondary Highway No. 57, said along said cbunty line to its intersection rate limits of the city of Laurinburg. junction being 2 miles southeast of Claussen. with the Clement-Beamons Cross Roads The Mrs. Polly I^cMillan farm, operated The B. H. Harwell farm located on both Highway, thence east along said highway to by Charlie McMillan, located on a dirt road sides of Sopth Carolina Secondary Highway its intersection with United States Highway and 1 mile north of Nashville Church, said No. 24 and 0.25 mile northwest of the junc­ No. 421 at Beamons Cross Roads, thence church being 1 mile northeast of Silver Hill. tion of South Carolina Secondary Highway southeast along said highway to Delway, The McNair farm, operated by Clyde Davis, No. 24 and South Carolina Secondary High­ thence west along a paved road to its junc­ located on a dirt road and 0.5 mile north­ way No. 921. tion with the Ingold-Tomahawk Highway, west of the junction of United States High­ The P. A. Kelley farm located on a dirt said junction being 2.9 miles southeast of way No. 15 and the Laurinburg and South­ road and approximately 1 mile south of the Ingold, thence south along the Ingold-Toma­ ern Railroad, said junction being 2 miles junction of said dirt road with a second dirt hawk Highway to its Junction with North north of Laurinburg. road at Jeffries Creek, said junction being Carolina Highway No. 411, thence west along The W. M. Monroe farm located on the 1.5 miles northeast of the junction of the North Carolina Highway No. 411 to its Inter­ south side of a paved road and 0.4 mile south­ said second dirt road and South Carolina section with United States Highway No. 701 east of Silver Hill. Secondary Highway No. 57, said junction at Garland, thence southwest along United Wayne County. The Mrs. Robert Barwick being 2 miles southeast of Claussen. States Highway No. 701 to the point of be­ farm (C. S. Pennington Estate), located on The E. S. McKissick farm located on the ginning, including the corporate limits of the both sides of a paved road and 0.6 mile east northwest corner of the junction of United city of Garland. of the junction of said paved road with a States Highway No. 301 and South Carolina The John Autry farm located at the end paved road, said junction being 1 mile north Secondary Highway No. 165. of a farm road and 1 mile north of the junc­ of Dobbersville. The R. Muldrow Matthews farm located on tion of said farm road with Clements-Bea- The Grainger Carter farm located on the both sides of a dirt road and 0.9 mile north­ mons Highway, said junction being 1.6 miles northwest side of a paved road and 0.4 mile east of the junction of said dirt road with west of Clement. north of the junction of said paved road and South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 46, The W. R. Balkcum farm located on the a dirt road, said junction being 0.5 mile said junction being 0.6 mile southeast of south side of a paved road and ^.5 miles west east of the intersection of said dirt road and of Delway. Coward. the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, said inter­ The A. B. Poston farm located on the The Edward Byrd farm located on section being 1.6 miles south of Dudley. south side of United States Highway No. 378 southwest side of a paved road and I n The Charlie Greenfield farm located on and approximately 1 mile west of the junc­ of the Junction of said paved r< both sides of a paved road and 0.9 mile south tion of United States Highway No. 378 and and Thrkey-Ingold Highway, said junct of the junction of said paved road and a dirt South Carolina Primary Highway No. 51. Dei?S 6 miles southwest of Turkey. road, said junction being 4.3 miles east of The A. D. Poston farm located on the south James Caldwell farm located on Dudley. side of United States Highway No. 378 and south side of a dirt road and 1.2 miles e South Carolina approximately 1 mile west of the junction VoJ t ,nction of said dirt road with T of United States Highway No. 378 and South miioo ^i&Hway, said junction being Darlington County. The Junius Bacote Carolina Primary Highway No. 51. south of Turkey. farm located on the north side of South The W. Eldred Poston farm (operated by J ^ ! , i ames Caldwell farm located on Carolina Secondary Highway No. 180 and Phillip Poston) located on the south side miles ^ujey-lngold Highway and I. 25 miles northwest of the junction of South mues south of Turkey. of United States Highway No. 378 and ap­ Carolina Secondary Highway No. 180 and proximately 1 mile west of the junction of the Chambers farm located South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 35. United States Highway No. 378 and South of thP il f de of a dirt road and 02 mile soi The D. M. Fountain farm located on the Carolina Primary Highway No. 51. Dunlin 1q!erSeGtlon of said dirt road and north side of South Carolina Primary High­ The W. Eldred- Poston farni located on a S County line- said ^ters way No. 34 and 0.1 mile northeast of the dirt road and 0.25 mile south of .the junc­ junction of South Carolina Primary High­ ^unL n68 dUe north of a P°lnt wh tion of said dirt road with South Carolina Highway N ag“ ® Crosses North Caro1 way No. 34 and South Carolina Secondary Secondary Highway No. 24, said junction be­ Highway No. 29. ing 0.5 mile east of the Junction of South WeItsidte°f8+uP' farm located on The Gurley Graham farm (formerly the Carolina Secondary Highway No. 24 and J. B. Howie farm) located on a dirt road and at a miJt f 2 m^tlantiC Coast Une ^ ii* South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 64. The s°utheast «t Garland, 0.6 mile northeast of the junction of said The W. Eldred Poston farm located on both south side iarm located on dirt road and South Carolina Secondary sides of South Carolina Primary Highway No. 102 and^ ¿ n junction with a dirt road, thence southwest side of a dirt road and approximately 0.4 said junction being 1 mile north ^ along said dirt road to its intersection with mile northwest of its junction with United junction of said highway and South Whiteoak Swamp, thence south along said States Highway No. 701, said junction being liria Secondary Highway No. 238. nnrth swamp to its junction with Kingston Lake 1 mile southwest of the junction of said The Eliza Long farm located on the Swamp, thence northeast along said Lake highway and South Carolina Secondary side of a dirt road and 1 mile west Swamp to the point of beginning. Highway No. 19. junction with South Carolina • The Henry Arnett and D. C. Arnett farm The Doris Harrelson farm located on the Highway No. 66, said junction being * located on both sides of a dirt road and 2.5 west side of a dirt road and approximately north of the junction of said highway miles east of its junction with South Caro­ 0.5 mile southwest of its junction with South South Carolina Primary Highway No. lina Secondary Highway No. 33, said junction Carolina Secondary Highway No. 31, said being 2.5 miles north of the junction of said junction being 2 miles north of the junction The Hamp Mishoe farm located highway and South Carolina Primary High­ of said highway and South Carolina Second­ north side of a dirt road and 1 m way No. 410. ary Highway No. 66. east of its junction with South Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4301

Secondary Highway No. 139, said Junction The Deck Strickland farm located on the An area in the northeast portion of the being 1.5 miles north of New Home Church. south side of South Carolina Secondary county bounded by a line beginning at a The J. W. Mishoe farm located on both Highway No. 75 and 1.25 miles southwest of point where the Little Pee Dee'River inter­ sides of a dirt road and 0.5 mile north of its its junction with South Carolina Primary sects South Carolina Secondary Highway No. junction with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 410. 60 and extending southeast along said river Highway No. 45, said Junction being 3.5 miles The E. M. Strickland farm located on the to its intersection with United States High­ west of junction of said highway and South south side of a dirt road and 0.2 mile south way No. 76, thence northeast along United Carolina Primary Highway No. 410. of the junction of said dirt road and South States Highway No. 76 to its intersection with The Clifford Prince farm located on the Carolina Secondary Highway No. 266, said Nichols city limits, thence north along the south side of South Carolina Secondary junction being 1.5 miles west of the junc­ west boundary of the city limits to its north­ Highway No. 112 and approximately 0.5 mile tion of said highway with South Carolina west corner, thence east along the north west of its Junction with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 19. boundary of the city limits to its intersection Secondary Highway No. 66. The Herrie Strickland farm located on the with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. The Troy Powell farm located at the east east side of South Carolina Secondary High­ 88; thence northwest along said highway 0.5 end of a dirt road and 0.8 mile east of its way No. 266 and 2.5 miles west of its junc­ mile to its junction with a dirt road, thence junction with a second dirt .road, said junc­ tion with South Carolina Secondary High­ west along said dirt road to its junction with tion being 1.25 miles south of the junction way No. 19. South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 43, of said second dirt road and South Carolina The Ida Strickland farm located on the thence west on a line projected from a point Secondary Highway No. 97 at Adrian. south side of a dirt road and approximately beginning at the Junction of said dirt road The Tula Rabon farm located on the west 1.5 miles southwest of its junction with and South Carolina Secondary Highway No. side of a dirt road and 0.5' mile south of South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 19, 43 and extending due west to its intersection Pleasant Union Church, said church being said junction being 0.25 mile south of Cart- with CrutchloW Branch, thence south along 0.75 mile east of the junction of said dirt Wheel Branch. Crutchlow Branch to its Intersection with road and South Carolina Secondary Highway The Maclaire B. Stroud farm located on the South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 30, No. 131. west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ thence northwest along said highway No. 30 The D. J. S. Sarvis farm located on the way No. 19 and 1.5 miles south of its inter­ to its junction with South Carolina Second­ south side of South Carolina Secondary section with Cedar Creek. ary Highway No. 60, thence southwest along Highway No. 45 and 1 mile southwest of its The J. B. Suggs farm located on the south said highway No. 60 to the point of beginning. junction with South Carolina Secondary side of a dirt road and approximately 0.4 mile An area in the central portion of the Highway No. 19. east of its junction with South Carolina Pri­ county bounded by a line beginning at a The Tolar Sarvis farm located on the south mary Highway No. 410, said junction being point where South Carolina Secondary High­ side of a dirt road and approximately 0.4 1 mile south of the intersection of said high­ way No. 19 and South Carolina Secondary mile east of its junction with South Carolina way and South Carolina Secondary Highway Highway No. 39 intersect and extending south Primary Highway No. 410, said junction being No. 45. and southeast along said South Carolina 1 mile south of the intersection of said high­ The Lewis Todd farm located on the east Secondary Highway No. 39 to its intersection way and South Carolina Secondary Highway side of South Carolina Secondary Highway with Reedy Creek, thence northeast along No. 45. No. 19 at its Junction with South Carolina the main run of said creek to its head, thence The L. C. Shannon, Jr. farm located on the Secondary Highway No. 97. on a line projected from head of said creek west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ The M. N. Todd farm located on the west to the junction of South Carolina Secondary way No. 139 and 1.75 miles south of Cane. side of South Carolina Secondary Highway Highways Nos. 19 and 90, thence east along Branch Church. No. 31 and 0.25 mile north of its junction South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 19 The Netta Spivey farm located on a dirt with a dirt road at Mount Vernon Church. to its junction with South Carolina Second­ road and approximately 1 mile northwest The Mack C. Todd farm located on both ary Highway No. 367, thence southeast along of its Junction with United States Highway sides of South Carolina Secondary Highway said highway No. 367 to its junction with No. 701, said junction being 1 mile south­ No. 19 and 1.75 miles north of its intersection South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 91, west of the intersection of said highway and with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. thence southeast along said highway No. 91 South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 19. 97. to its Junction with South Carolina Second­ The Cora G. Stevens farm located on the The R. C. Thompson farm located on the ary Highway No. 203, thence north and north­ north side of a private dirt road and 0.5 mile east side of South Carolina Secondary High­ east along said highway No. 203 to a junction north of its junction with South Carolina way No. 139 and 0.25 mile south of Cane with a dirt road, said Junction being 1.2 miles Secondary Highway No. 112, said Junction be­ Branch Church, said church being 1 mile northeast of the intersection of South Caro­ ing 1.25 miles east of the Junction of South south of the junction of South Carolina lina Secondary Highways Nos. 203 and 19, Carolina Secondary Highway No. 112 and Secondary Highway No. 139 and South Caro­ thence west 0.9 mile along said dirt road, South Carolina Secondary Highways Nos. 19 lina Secondary Highway No. 19. thence bn a line projected from said point and 139. The W. P. Tyler farm located on both sides in a northwest direction between Big. Sister The C. V. Stevens farm located on the nor of a dirt road and 1.25 miles north of the Bay and Little Sister Bay to its intersection de of a dirt road and approximately C junction of said dirt road with South Caro­ with United States Highway No. 76, thence nme northwest of its Junction with Uniti lina Secondary Highway No. 45, said junction southwest along said United States Highway 1 Jit? ®Bhway No. 701, said junction beii being 3.5 miles west of the junction of said No. 76 to Its junction with South Carolina i mne southwest of the junction of sa highway and South Carolina Primary High­ Secondary Highway No. 84, thence in a north­ way No. 410. ern direction 1.1 miles along said highway HighwayNo^g South Carolina Seconda The W. C. Watts farm located on the east No. 84 to its junction with a dirt road, thence ?°r£\ M- Stevens farm located on bo1 side of South Carolina Secondary Highway southwest along said dirt road to its junction of it* f a road and 0.5 mile northwe No. 66 and approximately 1 mile north of with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. No CH?n with United States Highw! its junction with South Carolina Secondary 45, thence northwest 0.7 mile along said high­ west of ,iunction being 1 mile soutl Highway No. 139. way No. 45 to its junction with a dirt road, South „ llle junction of said highway ai The W. J. Watts farm located on the north thence Southwest along said dirt road to its ath Carolina Secondary Highway Nof 19. side of South Carolina Primary Highway No. Junction with a second dirt road, known as side of a J?tevens farm lQcated on the ea 905 and 2.25 miles east of the Junction of old Marion road, thence southwest along old No 66 Jf*Uth Carolina Secondary Highwi South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 66. Marion road to its junction with United junc«o^dJI;??roximately 1 mile north of j Marion County. An area in the northern States Highway No. 76, thence east along Carolin*'Sec°»da portion of the county bounded by a line be­ said highway No. 76 to its intersection with ginning at a point where Catfish Canal inter­ Smith Swamp, thence southwest along said a<2 h side^f located on tl sects the Marion-Dillon County line and ex­ swamp to the point of beginning. way No d112famM ^ Caf.olina Secondary Hig: tending south along said canal to its An area in the southwest portion of the with South a£d miles east of its Juncti< intersection with a dirt road, known as the county bounded by a line beginning at a Nos. 19andl39.ar0liria Secondary Highwa; Spring Branch road, thence east along said point where South Carolina Secondary High­ dirt road to its connection with South Caro­ way No. 9 intersects Bull Swamp and extend­ northsideof,h! ^ 6118 farm located on V lina Secondary Highway No. 263, thence east ing southwest along said swamp to its inter­ west of its adlrt road and 0.75 mile nortl along said highway to its intersection with section with a dirt road, known as Cross NigbwavlX voinCti?? with United Stat South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 23, the Perry Road, thence northeast along said southwest of th« *iaid lUnction being 1 mi thence north along said highway to its inter­ dirt road to its junction with South Carolina and S o u t h i i Jnnction of said highws section with a branch, known as Moody’s Secondary Highway No. 9, thence northwest 19. Carolina Secondary Highway N Mill Pond Branch, thence due east 2.75 miles along said Highway No. 9 to the point of across Ten Mile Bay to the Intersection of a beginning. south ^d^of +land farm located on t! creek, known as the Gully, and a dirt road, The Mrs. B. E. Atkinson farm located on 15 mues 2 ,,^ ^ rt/ oad and approximate known as the Bryant’s Crossing-Zion road, the west side of a dirt road and 0.7 mile south South Carolines68* 01 its junction wi1 thence north along said dirt road to its inter­ of the junction of said dirt road with South said junctio^LiSeC°«ndary “ Shway No. 1 section with the Marion-Dillon County line, Carolina Secondary Highway No. 22, said wheel Branch.***118 0-25 111116 s°uth of Car thence west along said county line to the Junction being 2 miles northwest of the No. 104 point of beginning. community of Zion. 4302 RULES AND REGULATIONS

The B. L . Atkinson, farm located on the Highway No. 21 and 0.5 mile northeast of its of junction of said highway and United south side of South Carolina Secondary High­ junction with South Carolina Secondary States Highway No. 301. way No. 32 and on the east side of South Highway No. 29. The C. M. Rogers farm located on the north Carolina Secondary Highway No. 389 at their The Lucile Hoggard farm located on the side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile southwest of junction. north side of South Carolina Secondary Its junction with South Carolina Primary The Ed Baker farm located on the east Highway No. 22 and 0.7 mile southeast of its Highway No. 41 Alternate, said junction being side of South Carolina Secondary Highway intersection with the Seaboard Air Line 2 miles southwest of junction of said high­ No. 43 and 1.6 miles north of its junction Railroad. way and South Carolina Secondary High­ with South Carolina Secondary Highway The B. W. Hopkins farm located on the way No. 263. No. 30. north side of a dirt road and 0.4 mile north­ The Mazzie Rogers farm located on the The J. E. Bostick farm located on the east east of its intersection with South Carolina southwest side of South Carolina Secondary side of South Carolina Secondary Highway Secondary Highway No. 64, said intersection Highway No. 40 and 1.25 miles southeast of No. 9 and 0.9 mile northwest of its junction being 0.5 mile northwest of the junction of its junction with South Carolina Secondary with South Carolina Secondary Highway said highway and South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 9. No. 47. Highway No. 38. The V. M. Rogers farm located on the north The John F. Brown farm located on the The Charlie Ingram farm located on the side of South Carolina Secondary Highway west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ east side of a dirt road and 1.5 miles south No. 22 and 0.5 mile west of its intersection way No. 91 and 1.5 miles ntSrth of its junction of, its junction with United States Highway with the Seaboard Air Line Railroad. with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 378, said junction being 0.7 mile north­ The Frank Salmon farm located on the No. 32. west of the Potato Bed Ferry Bridge on Little northeast side of South Carolina Secondary The D. H. Bryant farm located on the south Pee Dee River. Highway No. 64 and 0.4 mile north of its side of a dirt road and 1 mile northeast of The C. H. Johnson farm located on the junction with South Carolina Secondary its junction with South Carolina Primary north side of South Carolina Secondary High­ Highway No. 38. Highway No. 41 Alternate, said junction way No. 32 and on the east side of South The Fleming Sanders farm located on the being 0.1 mile north of junction of South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 389 at their southwest side of a dirt road and 0.7 mile Carolina Primary Highway No. 41 Alternate junction. northwest of its junction with South Caro­ and South Carolina Secondary Highway The Julian Jones farm located on the west lina Secondary Highway No. 9, said junction No. 263. - side of South Carolina Secondary Highway being 0.75 mile southwest of intersection The Preston Bullard farm located on the No. 60 and 0.75 mile southeast of its junc­ of said highway and a stream known as Flat east side of a dirt road and 3.6 miles south tion with the Marion-Dillon County line. Swamp. of its junction with United States Highway The Mack Larimore farm located on the The Theo Sawyer farm located on the No. 76, said junction being 1.5 miles east, of south side of United States Highway No. 378 southwest side of South Carolina Secondary the junction of said highway and United and 0.5 mile northwest of its junction with Highway No. 39 and 1.1 miles south of its States Highway No. 301. South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 86. junction with South Carolina Secondary The William Burch Estate farm located The Walter H. Larimore farm located on Highway No. 19. on the north side of South Carolina Second­ the north side of United States Highway No. The Harry Sellers farm located on the west ary Highway No. 46 and 0.25 mile west of 378 and 0.5 mile northwest of the Potato Bed side of United States Highway No. 301 in its junction with South Carolina Primary Ferry Bridge on the Little Pee Dee River. the town of Sellers. Highway No. 41. The Durham Lewis farm located on the east The Grady Shelley farm located on the The W. P. Clark farm located on Marion side of South Carolina Secondary Highway north side of South Carolina Secondary High­ Street in the town of Mullins and one block No. 23 and 1.2 miles southwest of the junc­ way No. 32 and 0.5 mile east of its junction south of the Mullins Armory. tion of said highway and South Carolina with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. The D. L. Davis farm located on the east Secondary Highway No. 22. 389. side of a dirt road and 1.2 miles south of A portion of the Marion County Public The portion of the Wade E. Smith farm its junction with South Carolina Secondary Road, approximately 1 acre, including all located on the east side of South Carolina Highway No. 9 at Friendship. right-of-way, extending from the Marion- Secondary Highway No. 203 and 0.3 mile The William Davis farm located on the Dillon County line to a point 0.1 mile south northeast of its intersection with South southwest side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile of the Marion-Dillon County line, which Carolina Secondary Highway No. 19. northwest of its junction with South Caro­ point is 0.6 mile northeast of the junction of The Irene Snipes farm located on the south lina Secondary Highway No. 9, said junction said public road with South Carolina Sec­ side of a dirt road and 0.8 mile east of its being 0.5 mile northeast of the junction of ondary Highway No. 22. junction with United States Highway No. 501, said highway and South Carolina Secondary The Jack C. Martin farm located on the said junction being 0.8 mile north of the Highway No. 40. west side of a dirt road and 0.1 mile south­ junction of said highway and South Carolina The D. N. Faulk Estate located on both west of its junction with another dirt road, Secondary Highway No. 475. sides of South Carolina Primary Highway No.' said junction being 0.35 mile southwest of its The Southern Craft Paper Company farm, 41 Alternate and 2 miles southwest of its junction with South Carolina Secondary operated by Fred Holden, located on a dirt junction with South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 22, said junction being 0.5 mile road and 1 mile south of its junction with Highway No. 263. northwest of Zion. United States Highway No. 378, said junction The Jessie Floyd farm located on the east The J. L. Mason farm located on the south­ being 0.7 mile northwest of the Potato Bea side of South Carolina Primary Highway No. east side of South Carolina Primary High­ Ferry Bridge on the Little Pee Dee River. 9 and 0.6 mile north of its intersection with way No. 41 Alternate and 0.3 mile northeast Thè M. S. Stackhouse farm located on tne the corporate limits of Nichols. of the junction of said highway and South west side of a dirt road and 2 miles north The Lissie G. Ford farm located on the Carolina Secondary Highway No. 475. its junction with United States Highway* east side of South Carolina Primary Highway The Archie McRae farm located on the 301, said junction being 0.5 mile east of I» No. 9 at its intersection with the corporate north side of a dirt road and 0.65 mile north­ Dpa nan T?1VA1* limits of Nichols, west of its junction with another dirt road, The Mrs. John Steadman farm Iocat^ °“ The Grade Graves farm located on the said junction being 0.35 mile west of its junc­ the north side of United States Highway • north side of a dirt road and 0.6 mile west tion with South Carolina Secondary High­ 378 and 0.3 mile northwest of the row of its junction with South Carolina Sec­ way No. 22, said junction being 0.5 mile Bed Ferry Bridge on the Little Pee Dee • ondary Highway No. 9, said junction being northwest of Zion. The A. T. Turner farm located on r 0.25 mile southwest of the intersection of The F. E. Page farm located on the north­ northeast side of South Carolina Seco said highway and Flat Swamp, a stream. west side of a dirt road and 0.5 mile north­ Highway No. 64 and 1.2 miles northwest The R. A. Guyton farm located on the east of its junction with United States High­ its junction with South Carolina Seconaa j northwest side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile way No. 76, said junction being 1.5 miles east Highway No. 38. • . northeast of its junction with United States of the Marion city limits. The Pearlie Turner farm locatea w Highway No. 76, said junction being 1.5 miles The Fred Page farm located on the south­ east side of South Carolina Secondary east of the Marion city limits. west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ way No. 64 and 0.7 mile north of it& Juac* The M. M. Harper farm located on the way No. 309 and 0.25 mile northwest of its with United States Highway No. 76. north side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile east junction with United States Highway No. 76. The John Walters farm located o 1 of its junction with United States Highway The Marvin Phillips farm located on the southwest side of a dirt states No. 501, said junction being 0.8 mile north west side of a dirt road and 0.75 mile north­ south of its junction with Unitw ^5 of the junction of said highway and South Highway No. 76, said junction negates east of its intersection with South Carolina miles west of the intersection of Uni River_ Carolina Secondary Highway No. 475. Secondary Highway No. 64, said intersection The N. P. Harper farm located on the south Highway No. 76 and the Little Pee side of a dirt road and 0.5 mile east of its being 0.5 mile northwest of the junction of The Wilbur S. White farm locatea ^ junction with United States Highway No. 501, said highway and South Carolina Secondary northeast side of United States Hig said junction being 0.8 mile north of the Highway No. 38. 501 and 0.5 mile southeast of its j No_ junction of said highway and South Carolina The Mary J. Porter farm located on the with South Carolina Primary Big Secondary Highway No. 475. west side of a dirt road and 1.5 miles south­ 41 Alternate. ,pd by a The William L. Harrelson farm located on west of its junction with United States High­ Marlboro County. The area bouna the north side of South Carolina Secondary way No. 76, said junction being 1.5 miles east line beginning at a point where S Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4303 lina Secondary Highway No. 99 crosses the The Walter S. Hughes farm located on the the junction of said dirt road with South Marlboro-Dillon County line, thence south­ west side of South Carolina Secondary High­ Carolina Secondary Highway No. 23, said west along said county line to Brownsville way No. 44 and 0.5 mile southeast of the junction being 0.25 mile southeast of the Creek, thence north along said creek to South junction of the South Carolina Secondary junction of South Carolina Secondary High­ Carolina Primary Highway No. 34, thence Highway No. 44 and South Carolina Sec­ ways Nos. 23 and 202. northeast along said highway to its junction ondary Highway No. 18. . The H. L. Watson farm located on the with South Carolina Primary Highway No. 38, The Walter S. Hughes farm located on the south side of South Carolina Secondary thence northwest along said highway to its west side of a dirt road and 0.8 mile south of Highway No. 23 and 0.6 mile southeast of Junction with a dirt road at Lower Marlboro the junction of said dirt road with South the junction of South Carolina Secondary High School, thence northeast along said dirt Carolina Secondary Highway No. 31, said Highway No. 23 and South Carolina Sec­ road to its junction with South Carolina junction being 1.4 miles southwest of ondary Highway No. 202. Secondary Highway No. 49, thence southeast Bristow. The Alzada Ivey farm located on the west (Sec. 9, 37 Stat. 318, sec. 106, 71 Stat. 33; 7 along said highway to its Junction with U.S.C. 162, 150ee; 19 P.R. 74, as amended; 7 South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 32, side of South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 197 and 1.5 miles west of the Marlboro- CFR 301.80-2. Interprets or applies sec. 8, thence southwest along said highway to its 37 Stat. 318, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 161) junction with South Carolina Secondary Dillon County line. Highway No. 99, thence southeast along said The Mrs. Mary Kersey farm located on the These revised administrative instruc­ highway to the point of beginning. east side of a dirt road and 1 mile southeast tions shall become effective May 28,1959, The area bounded by a line beginning at of the intersection of said dirt road with when they shall supersede P.P.C. 627, Re­ a point where the Little Pee Dee River crosses South Carolina Secondary Highway No. 32, the Marlboro-Dillon County line, thence said junction being 1 mile nprtheast of the vised, December 3, 1957 (7 CFR, 1957 northwest along said river to its junction junction of South Carolina Secondary High­ Supp., 301.80-2a). with Gun Swamp, thence north along Gun way No. 32 and South Carolina Primary High­ . The purposes of this revision are to Swamp to the North Carolina-South Carolina way No. 38. make certain additions to the regulated State line, thence southeast along said State The Mrs. Alice McDaniel farm located on areas in North Carolina and South Caro­ line to the Marlboro-Dillon County line, the south side of South Carolina Secondary lina and to redefine the regulated areas, thence southwest along said county line to Highway No. 40 and 0.3 mile west of the wherever possible, in terms of individual the point of beginning. junction of South Carolina Secondary High­ infested premises rather than the more The D. A. Alford farm located on the south way No. 40 and South Carolina Secondary side of South Carolina Secondary Highway Highway No. 22, said junction being 2 miles extensive localities originally included. No. 40 and 1.5 miles southeast of the inter­ southeast of Tatum. The general surveys that initially delim­ section of South Carolina Primary Highway The Lula McEachern farm located 0.1 mile ited the regulated areas have been fol­ No. 83 and South Carolina Secondary High­ southwest of the North Carolina-South Caro­ lowed by more comprehensive surveys way No. 40. lina State line and on the west side of a dirt that have determined the uninfested The W. P. Allen farm located on both sides road which crosses the North Carolina- status of many localities in close prox­ of a dirt road and 0.8 mile southwest of the South Carolina State line at a point 1.5 miles, imity to known infestations. junction of said dirt road with South Caro­ southeast of the intersection of the State lina Secondary Highway No. 57, said junction line and United States Highway No. 15. These instructions, in part, add cer­ being 1 miles north of Marlboro. The Bobby McIntyre farm located on the tain new territory to the regulated area. The A. G. Buckner farm located on thé east side of South Carolina Secondary High-* They also relieve restrictions insofar as south side of the junction of the Little Pee way No. 40 and 0.3 mile northwest of the they omit from the regulated areas cer­ Dee River and South Carolina Primary Marlboro-Dillon County line. tain localities previously so designated. Highway No. 83, said junction being 2.6 The M. R. McLennan farm located at the Therefore, prompt action on these in­ miles southwest of the North Carolina-South end of a 0.2 mile service road which connects wjth a dirt road which joins South Carolina structions is necessary in order to control Carolina State line. the movement from the additional ter­ The R. K. Christopher farm located on the Secondary Highway No. 19 at a point 0.5 mile north side of South Carolina Secondary east of the junction of South Carolina Sec­ ritory to be regulated of articles that Highway No. 23 and 0.3 mile southeast of ondary Highway No. 19 and South Carolina might spread the witchweed and in order he Junction of South Carolina Secondary Primary Highway No. 83. to be of maximum benefit in permitting Highway No. 23 and South Carolina Second­ The Russell Miller farm located on the the interstate movement, without re­ ary Highway No. 202. north side of South Carolina Secondary striction under the quarantine, of regu­ . ?ke Curtis Clark farm located on the west Highway No. 299 and 1.1 miles east of Drake. lated products from the premises being side of South Carolina Primary Highway No. The J. P. Moore farm located on the north side of a dirt road and 0.6 mile southwest removed from designation as regulated &L+?d«0'8 mlle north of the Junction of of the junction of said dirt road with South areas. Accordingly, under section 4 of -Ues — ‘ Highway No. 202. cause is found for making the effective The Mrs. Annie Jane Quick Peele farm date thereof less than 30 days after pub­ H' Cox farm located on the rori located on the north side of South Carolina lication in the F ederal R egister. No 99am?’it^ 1Par°lina Secondary Highws Secondary Highway No. 509 (Tommy Quick Done at Washington, D.C., this 22d day «¿«“ ratjiui“ 01 the M“ Ib™ Road) and 0.3 mile southeast of the junc­ tion of South Carolina Secondary Highway of May 1959. sl^ofJ+iia^ ? rake farm located on bo1 No. 509 and South Carolina Secondary High­ [seal] E. D. Burgess, of-wav and Sea^oard Airline Railroad righ way No. 273. tion of n°rthwest of the in terse The Mrs. B. D. -Rogers, Sr., farm located Director, South rar«nSeaboard Airllne Railroad ar on the north side of the Seaboard Airline Plant Pest Control Division. i i i S a11hla11SeCOndary Highway No. ! Railroad right-of-way and 0.5 mile northwest [F.R. Doc. 59--4480; Filed, May 27, 1959; thereon!6 &U railroad right-of-way abuttii of~ the intersection of the Seaboard Airline 8:48 a.m.] Railroad and South Carolina Secondary thevrest aid! 5 abeJ,n Estate iarm located t Highway No. 59, including all railroad right- said dirt a d*r^ road at the Junction of-way abutting thereon. Thé Carpenter Rogers farm located on the section of r™ ^ miles south of the inte north side of South Carolina Secondary Chapter IX— Agricultural Marketing Secondarv SwamP and South Carolii Highway No. 18 and 0.4 mile northeast of the Service (Marketing Agreements and ^aary Highway No. 27. junction of South Carolina Secondary High­ side of South°^ fa1?n located on the nor1 way No. 18 and South Carolina Secondary Orders), Department of Agriculture No. 99 and i n Ca^°lina Secondary Highw! Highway No. 44. [Milk Order 27] tion o f ^ uih5 “^es southeast of the jun The Marion Rogers farm located on the No. 99 and soufhrn in » Secondary Hi^hwi west side of South Carolina Primary High­ PART 927— MILK IN NEW YORK-NEW way No. 82 Carolina Secondary Higl way No. 38 and 0.1 mile north of the inter­ JERSEY MARKETING AREA section of South Carolina Primary Highway the 5deUifb^ farm located < No. 38 and South Carolina Secondary High­ Order Suspending Certain Provision Highway No an Carolina Seconda way No. 299. the Marlboro n iifnd 0-5 mile northwest The T. J. Turner farm located on the north Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri­ ^ro-Dillon County line. side of a dirt road and 1 mile northeast of cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 4304 RULES AND REGULATIONS 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Issued at Washington, D.C., this 25th employee of such administrative unit as and of the order regulating the handling day of May 1959. he shall designate may increase the mayimnr^ of milk in the New York-New Jersey milk certificated weight fdr airplanes which are: Clarence L. M iller, (a) Operated entirely within the State of marketing area (7 CFR Part 927), it is Assistant Secretary. Alaska by an Alaskan air carrier or an Alas- hereby found and determined that: kan air taxi operator pursuant to Parts 292 a. The following provision of the or­ [F.R. Doc. 59-4490; Filed, May 27, 1959; and 293, respectively, of the Civil Aeronautics der does not tend to effectuate the de­ 8:50 a.m.] Board’s Economic Regulations, or by the clared policy of the Act with respect United States Department Of the Interior in to payments required by the order the conduct of its game and fish law enforce­ (§ 927.70X. to be made by handlers di­ ment activities and its management, fire Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND detection, and fire suppression activities con­ rectly to producers by not later than the cerning public lands; and 25th day of each of the months of June SPACE (b) Type certificated under the provisions through December 1959: of Aeronautical Bulletin No. 7 of the Aero­ 1. Subparagraph (6) of § 927.71(b) Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency nautics Branch of the United States Depart­ which reads: (6) The differential shall ment of Commerce dated January 1, 1939, as be reduced by 10 percent for each full SUBCHAPTER A— CIVIL AIR REGULATIONS amended, or under the normal category of 0.01 that the ratio computed pursuant to [Special Civil Air Reg. SR-399B] Part 4a of the Civil Air Regulations. subdivision (i) of this subparagraph ex­ 2. The maximum certificated weight herein ceeds the ratio computed pursuant to PART 4a— AIRPLANE referred to shall not exceed any of the AIRWORTHINESS following: subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph: (a) 12,500 pounds, (i) Divide the total receipts of milk PART 42— IRREGULAR AIR CARRIER (b) 115 percent of the maximum weight subject to the nearby differential in the AND OFF-ROUTE RULES listed in the FAA Aircraft Specification, preceding 12 months by the total Class (c) The weight at which the airplane PART 43— GENERAL OPERATION meets the positive maneuvering load factor I—A milk in such 12 months, and requirement for the normal category specified (ii) Divide the total receipts of milk RULES in § 3.186 of the Civil Air Regulations, or subject to the nearby differential in the (d) The weight at which the airplane first 12 months of this provision by the PART 45— COMMERCIAL OPERATOR meets the climb performance requirements total Class I-A milk in the first 12 CERTIFICATION AND OPERATION under which it was type certificated. months of this provision. RULES 3. In determining the maximum certifi­ cated weight the structural soundness of the b. The reduction of nearby differential Provisional Maximum Certificated airplane and the terrain to be traversed in rates resulting from operation of the Weights for Certain Airplanes Op­ the operation will be considered. 4. The maximum certificated weight so de­ aforesaid provision is improper and not erated by Alaskan Air Carriers, in accord with the purpose of such pro­ termined will be added to the airplane’s op­ vision in that such reduction reflects Alaskan Air Taxi Operators, and eration limitations and identified as the the Department of the Interior maximum weight authorized for operations milk received from additional producers within the State of Alaska. made eligible for nearby differentials by Special Civil Air Regulations Nos. amendment of the order effective Sep­ SR-399 and SR-399A, (18 F.R. 6799 and This regulation supersedes Special tember 1, 1958 (23 F.R. 6737), a factor 20 F.R. 8091) authorized the Adminis­ Civil Air Regulation No. SR-399A, and which*such provision was not designed to trator to establish increased maximum shall terminate on October 25, I960, un­ reflect. authorized weights for certain airplanes less sooner superseded or rescinded. c. Notice of this proposed suspension of 12,500 pounds or less operated entirely (Sec. 313(a), 72 Stat. 752; 49 U.S.C. 1354. In­ and of opportunity for the submission of within Alaska by Alaskan air carriers terpret or apply secs. 601, 603, 604, 72 Stat. data, views and arguments with respect as designated by Part 292 of the Board’s 775, 776, 778; 49 U.S.C. 1421, 1423, 1424) thereto, was issued on April 30, 1959, and Economic Regulations or by the United published in ,the F ederal R egister on States Department of the Interior. Ef­ Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 21, May 5,1959 (24 F.R. 3608). fective February 3, 1959, the Civil Aero­ 1Q5Q d. All data, views and arguments sub­ nautics Board amended Part 292 to elim-_ J ames T. Pyle, mitted by interested parties have been inate Alaskan pilot-owners from the pro­ Acting Administrator. carefully considered. visions of that Part (24 F.R. 437) and e. Good cause exists for making this [F.R. Doc. 59-4458; Filed, May 27, 1959; concurrently adopted new Part 293 (24 8:45 a.m.] suspension order effective as to payments F.R. 127) redesignating such air carriers required to be made by handlers directly as Alaskan air taxi operators. Accord­ to producers by not later than the 25th ingly, in order to permit this new class day of June 1959, even though such pay­ of air carriers to continue operating air­ ments are for milk received from pro­ planes under the increased maximum Chapter III— Federal Aviation Agency ducers during the month of May 1959, weights authorized by SR-399A, such in that: regulations are revised to specifically in­ SUBCHAPTER C— AIRCRAFT REGULATIONS 1. It is necessary to restore nearby clude Alaskan air taxi operators. How­ [Arndt. 20] differential rates as promptly as possible ever, Alaskan air taxi operators will re­ to the level intended in order to properly main subject to the 7,900 pound weight PART 507— AIRWORTHINESS reflect current marketing conditions and limitation imposed by Part 293. DIRECTIVES to facilitate, promote and maintain This special regulation does not im­ orderly marketing conditions in the pose any additional burden upon any Operating Restriction marketing area, and person and is purely technical in nature. 2. This suspension order will not effect For these reasons, the Administrator As a result of turbine blade failure1 ° the cost of milk to any handler and will finds that compliance with the notice, Allison 501-D13 and -D13A engineSD?g(i not require of handlers or other persons public participation and effective date to a resonance condition at low spee substantial or extensive preparation ground idle, I find that an unsafe prior to its effective date. provisions of section 4 of the Adminis­ trative Procedure Act is unnecessary. dition exists with respect to these^ ^ It is therefore ordered, That the afore­ gines requiring immediate operating said provision of the order is hereby sus­ In consideration of the foregoing, I pended effective with respect to pay­ hereby adopt a Special Civil Air Regu­ striction and inspection. _re ments required by the order to be made lation, effective immediately on the date In the interest of safety, c°mJr.tive by handlers directly to producers by not of its publication in the F ederal R egis­ with the notice, procedures and later than the 25th day of each of the ter, to read as follows: date provisions of section 4 of t cfi. months of June through December 1959, 1. Notwithstanding any contrary provi­ministrative Procedure Act, ^ irrlP eSt (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. sions of the Civil Air Regulations, the Di­ cable and contrary to the public i 601-674) rector, Bureau of Flight Standards and any Thursday, May 28,, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4305

Accordingly § 507.10(a) is amended by net value of the shipment is within the adding the following: Title 15— COMMERCE AND dollarrvalue limit specified in the column 59-10-2 Allison. Applies to Model 501- headed “GLV Dollar Value Limits.” D13 and 501-D13A engines. FOREIGN TRADE (2) O destinations. RO commodities Aircraft not having operating engine vi­ classified in a single entry on the Posi­ bration detection equipment must observe Chapter III— Bureau of Foreign Com­ tive List may be exported to Group O the following engine operating restriction merce, Department of Commerce destinations, provided that the net value and inspection. of the shipment is within the dollar- (1) Low speed ground idle not to exceed SUBCHAPTER B— EXPORT REGULATIONS two minutes after all engines have been value limit specified in the column started and two minutes prior to the stopping [9th Gen. Rev. of Export Regs., Arndt. 17a] headed “GLV Dollar Value Limits” (in­ cluding those limits specified as “none”) , of engines at the end of flight. PART 371— GENERAL LICENSES (2) Conduct inspection of fourth stage or $500, whichever is higher. turbine blades before next departure of air­ Miscellaneous Amendments Note : R Commodities. R commodities may planes from principal maintenance base and be exported to Group O destinations without thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25 hours 1. Section 371.10 General Incense GLV;dollar-value limit under the provisions of of operation for indications of damage using shipments of limited value, paragraph General License GO (§ 371.7). adequate light and optical aid. If any dam­ (d) Positive List commodities is amended age is discovered it is cause for more detailed to read as follows: 2. Section 371.17General License GCC; inspection and/or engine removal. This re­ commodities sold at auction by Bureau striction shall remain in force until further (d) Positive List co m m o d itiesCom­ of Customs is revoked. notice. modities included on the Positive List of This amendment shall become effective This amendment shall become effective Commodities (’§ 399.1 of this chapter) May 21, 1959. immediately. may be exported, in a single shipment under this general license to all desti­ (Sec. 3, 63 Stat. 7; 50 U.S.C. App. 2023. E.O. (Sec. 313(a), 601, 603 ; 72 Stat. 752, 775, 776; 9630, 10 P.R. 12245, 3 CFR, 1945 Supp., E.O. nations, except Hong Kong, Macao, Po­ 9919, 13 F.R. 59, 3 CFR, 1948 Supp.) 49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, 1423) land (including Danzig), and Subgroup Issued in Washington, D.C., on May 21, A countries (see § 371.3(a)), as follows: Loring K. Macy, 1959. (1) R destinations. RO or R com­ Director, modities classified in a single entry on Bureau of Foreign Commerce. J ames T. P yle, the Positive List may be exported to [F.R. Doc. 59-4483; Filed, May 27, 1959; Acting Administrator. Group R destinations, provided that the 8:49 a.m,] [F.R. Doc. 59-4457; Piled, May 27, 1959; 8:45 a.m.] Title 22— FOREIGN RELATIONS PROPOSED RULE MAKING Chapter I— Department of State imum charges at $5.00 per acre for the [Dept. Reg. 108.404] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR first acre or fraction thereof on each tract of land for which operation and PART 61—PAYMENTS TO AND ON Bureau of Indian Affairs maintenance bills are prepared and to BEHALF OF PARTICIPANTS IN THE [ 25 CFR Part 221 ] establish a minimum of $8.75 on each bill INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL as rendered. BASIC AND OTHER WATER CHARGES Interested parties are hereby given op­ EXCHANGE PROGRAM portunity to participate in preparing the Per Diem Allowances to Foreign Fort Hall Irrigation Project, Fort Hall proposed amendment by submitting their Indian Reservation, Idaho views and data or arguments in writing Participants to Don C. Foster, Area Director, Bureau May' 20, 1959. Paragraph (c) (1) of §61.3 Grants i of Indian Affairs, Post Office Box 4097, Foreign Participants to observe, consul Pursuant to section 4(a). of the Ad­ Portland 8, , within 30 days from or demonstrate special skills, is amende ministrative Procedure Act of June 11, the date of publication of this notice of 1946 (60 Stat. 238 U.S.C. 1001) and pur­ intention in the daily issue of the F ederal as follows, effective July 1,1959: suant to the Acts of August 11,1914 and R egister. (0 Per diem allowances. (1) Perdiei March 7, 1928 (38 Stat.-583, 45 Stat. 210; Martin N. B. Holm, allowance not to exceed $17 in lieu c 25 U.S.C. 385, 387) and by virtue of au­ Acting Area Director. subsistence expenses while traveling t thority delegated by the Commissioner [F.R. Doc. 59-4466; Filed, May 27, 1959; a from the United States (except fc of Indian Affairs to the undersigned Area 8:46 a.m.] Director, Portland Area Office, Portland, £ per*°d spent on seagoing vessels! Oregon by Order No. 551, Amendment mie on authorized or emergency stop No. 1, approved June 5, 1951 (16 F.R. ers, and while participating in the pro 3456-3457), a notice is hereby given of National Park Service pnc?’ prov^ ed, however, that in certai intention to modify § 221.32 Basic and s a per diem of not to exceed $25 ma other water charges, of Title 25, Code of [ 36 CFR Part 20 1 stsih, bofized for participants whos Federal Regulations, dealing with the ZION AND BRYCE CANYON treatment POS^*on wou^ require specii operation and maintenance assessments against the area benefited by the irriga­ NATIONAL PARKS tion systems on the Fort Hall Irrigation 15lc) 4‘ 63 Stat' lllr 58 amended; 5 U.S.< Project, Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Trucking Idaho, as follows: Basis and purpose. Notice is hereby ^ated: May 14,1959. To establish a basic water charge for given that pursuant to section 4(a) of the Fort Hall Project of $3.75 per acre the Administrative Procedure Act, ap­ Por the Secretary of State. per annum and the basic charge for the proved June 11, 1946 (60-Stat. 238; 5 Minor Units of $1.25 per acre per annum. U.S.C., 1952 ed., sec. 1003), authority anf Secretary for ^diS^nStration. In addition thereto, to establish the min- contained in section 3 of the act of Au­ gust 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C., ^ D0C‘ 59~4477; Piled, May 27, 1959; 1This amendment was published in Cur­ 1952 ed., sec. 3), National Park Service 8:48 a.m.] rent Export Bulletin 816, dated May 21, 1959. Order No. 14, 19 F.R. 8824; Regional Di- 4306 PROPOSED RULE MAKING rector, Region Three, Order No. 3,21 P.R. B asis of Grading Cauliflower 1494, it is proposed to amend 36 CFR DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 20.10 as set forth below. The purpose of § 51.3222 Basis of grading cauliflower. the special regulations is to set the maxi­ Agricultural Marketing Service In grading cauliflower, defective seg­ mum load, weight, and size of vehicles, to ments shall be removed from the head specify prohibited vehicles, to exempt E 7 CFR Part 51 3 and classed as culls: Provided, That public vehicles and to designate condi­ UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR when more than one-half of the head is tions when vehicles which exceed maxi­ defective, the entire head shall be classed mum size and weight are permitted to CAULIFLOWER FOR PROCESSING1 as a cull. (See § 51.3230.) travel over certain roads in Zion Na­ Application of S tandards tional Park. Notice of Proposed Rule Making This proposed amendment relates to Notice is hereby given that the United § 51.3223 Application of standards. matters which are exempt from the rule States Department of Agriculture is con­ In the application of this grade to de­ making requirements of the Adminis­ sidering the issuance of United States termine the percentage of the lot which trative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 1003) ; Standards for Cauliflower for Processing meets the requirements of U.S. No. 1 however, it is the policy of the Depart­ pursuant to the authority contained 4n grade, tolerances shall not apply. When ment of the interior that, wherever prac­ the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 a lot is required to meet U.S. No. 1 grade, ticable, the rule making requirements be (secs. 202-208, 60 Stat. 1087, as amend­ the following tolerances, by weight, shall observed voluntarily. Accordingly, in­ ed; 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627). apply: terested persons may submit in triplicate All persons who desire to submit writ­ (a) Tolerances for defects. 10 per­ written comments, suggestions, or ob­ ten data, views or arguments fôr consid­ cent for cauliflower which fails to meet jections with respect to the proposed eration in connection with the proposed the requirements of the grade, other amendments to the Superintendent, Zion standards should file the same with the than tor size : Provided, That not more National Park, Springdale, Utah, within Chief, Fresh Products Standardization than one-fifth of this amount, or 2 per­ thirty days of the date of publication of and Inspection Branch, Fruit and Veg­ cent, shall be allowed for cauliflower this notice in the F ederal R egister. etable Division, Agricultural Marketing affected by soft or wet decay; and, In § 20.10 Zion and Bryce Canyon Na­ Service, United States Department of (b) Tolerance for size. Not more than tional Parks, paragraphs (a) and.,-(b) Agriculture, South Building, Washington 5 percent of any lot shall be allowed for are amended to read as follows: 25, D.C., not later than July 1,1959. heads failing to meet the specified mini­ (a) Limitations on load, weight, and The proposed standards are as follows : mum size. size of vehicles—(1) Maximum size of Grade D efinitions vehicles. Sec. § 51.3224 Fresh. . Feet 51.3220 U.S. No. 1. “Fresh” means that the head is not Total width of vehicle, including load- 8 Gulls Total height of vehicle with load____ 10'6” 51.3221 Culls. more than slightly wilted. Total length of single vehicle______35 Total length of combination of vehi­ Basis op Grading Cauliflower § 51.3225 Compact. cles______55 51.3222 Basis of grading cauliflower. “Compact” means that the flower clusters of the head or segments of the (2) Maximum weight of vehicles. The pplication op tandards A S head are tightly united. load limits on single axles, wheels and 51.3223 Application of standards. tires, and the maximum gross weight of § 51.3226 Characteristic color. Definitions vehicles and loads, shall be the same as “Characteristic color” means that the the limits prescribed by the laws of Utah. 51.3224 Fresh. head or segments of the head are white (b) Prohibited vehicles. (1) The51.3225 Compact. Zion-Mt. Carmel Road within the park 51.3226 Characteristic color. or creamy white. shall be open to commercial truck traffic 51.3227 Cull material. § 51.3227 Cull material. only-during those times (approximately 51.3228 Damage. 51.3229 Diameter. “Cull material” means jacket leaves from October 1 to June 1) when the 51.3230 Segment. and stems removed in the proper trim­ Zion-Bryce Canyon Approach Road, ming of the heads and any loose leaves Authority: §§ 51.3220 to 51.3230 issued Utah State Route 14, is closed to such under secs. 202-208, 60 Stat. 1087, as amend­ or foreign material. traffic. ed; 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627. (2) During the period October 1 to § 51.3228 Damage. June 1, vehicles exceeding 30,000 pounds G rade “Damage”, unless otherwise specifi­ cally defined in this section, means any gross vehicle weight will be permitted § 51.3220 U.S.-No. 1. defect which materially affects tne over park roads throughout the 24-hour “U.S. No. 1” consists of cauliflower appearance, or the processing qiiahty o day. Before and after this period such which is fresh, compact, which has good the cauliflower. Any one. of the follow- vehicles will be permitted to operate over characteristic color and is free from ing defects, or any combination park roads only when Utah 14 is closed jacket leaves, stalks and other cull ma­ defects the seriousness of which excee to such traffic, and then only during the terial, soft or wet decay, and free from the maximum allowed for any one deie . hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. local stand­ damage caused by discoloration, bruis­ shall be considered as damage: ard time. ing, riciness, fuzziness, enlarged bracts, (a) Discoloration when the ca dirt or other foreign material, mildew or flower is o f som e abnorm al color wm Nothing in this section shall be con­ other disease, insects, freezing, hail or will not change to a white or light cr strued to prohibit vehicles complying mechanical or other means. color in th e ordinary process with Utah State weight and size limita­ (a) Unless otherwise specified, eachblanching; , h,id tions, owned by the Federal, State or head shall be not less than 4 inches in (b) Riciness when individual county government, from passage over diameter. branches have become slightly park roads when used in connection with Culls and flower clusters have lost ci)® ?for official operations. § 51.3221 Culls. ness to the extent that a granii abn orm ally rough surface is appa > (Sec. 3, 39 Stat. 535, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3) “Culls” consist of cauliflower which (c) Enlarged leaf bracts (modifi fails to meet the requirements of the Issued this 21st day of April 1959. grown leaves) when a segment na*• , foregoing grade, other than for size. (1) More than 3 light g«*®ftftbe P aul R. F ranke, bracts extending over the shoulder Superintendent, 1 Packing of the product in conformity with the requirements of these standards segment; . . Zion National ParkT shall not excuse failure to comply with the (2) One light green leaf bract®«the [F.R. Doc. 59-4485; Filed, May 27, 1959; provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and ing more than half way a°r 8:49 a.m.j Cosmetic Act. segment; or, Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4307 (3) Any leaf bract darker In color Done at Washington, D.C., this 25th tor, Grain Division, Agricultural Mar­ than light green; and, day of May 1959. keting Service, United States Department (d) Insects when there is more than Clarence L. Miller, of Agriculture, Washington 25, D.C., to slight infestation or when the cauliflower Assistant Secretary. be received by him not later than 30 days .is blemished by feeding or other means [F.R. Doc. 59-4491; Filed, May 27, 1959; after this proposal has been published to the extent that the appearance or pro­ 8:50 a.m.} in the F ederal R egister. The time in cessing quality is materially affected. which interested persons may submit written data, views, and arguments to § 51.3229 Diameter. the Director, Grain Division, on the pro­ “Diameter” means the greatest dimen­ [ 7 CFR Part 68 ] posed amendments to the United States sion of the head measured at right angles Standards for Rough Rice, Brown Rice, to a line running from the crown to the UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR and Milled Rice as published in the base of the head, exclusive of the jacket ROUGH RICE, BROWN RICE, AND F ederal R egister of April 28 (24 F.R. leaves. MILLED RICE / 3281) is also extended to conform to the § 51.3230 Segment. date permitted in this notice. Consider­ Notice of Proposed Rule Making ation will be given to all written data “Segment” means one of the principal On April 28, 1959, there appeared in presented to the Director and to all other divisions of the head, consisting of a the F ederal R egister (24 F.R. 3281) a information available in the United primary branch of the stem, including notice that the U.S. Department of Agri­ States Department of . Agriculture in ar­ secondary branches and flower buds. culture was considering proposed amend­ riving at a decision with respect to the Dated: May 25, 1959. ments to the United States Standards proposed revision of the rice standards. for Rough Rice (7 CFR 68.201 et seq.), Roy W. Lennartson, for Brown Rice (7 CFR 68.251 et seq.), Done at Washington, D.C., this 25th Deputy Administrator, and for Milled Rice (7 CFR 68.301 et day of May 1959. Marketing Services. seq.) pursuant to the authority con­ R oy W. Lennartson, [F.R. Doc. 59-4478; Filed, May 27, 1959; tained in the Agricultural Marketing Act Deputy Administrator, 8:48 a.m.] of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1621 et Agricultural Marketing Service. seq.).- [F.R. Doc. 59-4479; Filed, May 27, 1959; Notice is hereby given that the U.S. 8:48 a.m.] Department of Agriculture will give con­ sideration to the following alternative [ 7 CFR Part 53 1 proposals to said proposed amendments to the United States Standards for Commodity Exchange Authority UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR Milled Rice (7 CFR 68.301 et seq.) : LAMB, YEARLING MUTTON, AND 1. Second Head milled rice, § 68.301 [ 17 CFR Part 1 1 MUTTON CARCASSES (b) (4) : Consideration will be given to an alternative proposal to define the EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONS TO Proposed Suspension of Federal Meat class Second Head milled rice as follows: WHOM TRADING PRIVILEGES Grading Service (4) Second Head milled rice shall be HAVE BEEN DENIED OR WHOSE The Department of Agriculture has re­ milled rice which contains not more than REGISTRATIONS HAVE BEEN SUS­ ceived requests from The National Wool 25.0 percent of whole kernels, not more PENDED OR REVOKED Growers Association and The National than 7.0 percent of broken kernels that Lamb Feeders Association that the grad­ can be removed readily with a No. 6 Notice of Proposed Rule Making ing of lamb, yearling mutton, and mutton sizing plate, not more than 0.2 percent Pursuant to section 4 of the Adminis­ carcasses, in accordance with the United of broken kernels that can be removed trative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 238; 5 States Standards, under the Federal readily with a No. 5 sizing plate, and not U.S.C. 1003), notiee is hereby given that Meat Grading Regulations (7 CFR Part more than 0.04 percent that will pass the Secretary of Agriculture, under au­ 53, as amended), issued under the au­ readily through a 4/64 sieve. thority of sections 203 and 205 of the Ag­ thority contained in sections 4g, 6(b), ricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as 2. No. 6 sizing plate, § 68.301 (r) : Con­ and 8a (5) of the Commodity Exchange amended (7 U.S.C. 1622, 1624); be sus­ sideration will be given to a proposal Act (7 U.S.C. 6g,,9, 12a(5)) , is consider­ pended. Such associations contend that to add a definition for a No. 6 sizing ing the issuance of a regulation under the me rendering of such service is not war- plate to read as follows: Commodity Exchange Act, to be desig­ ranted under the present circumstances. (r) No. 6 sizing plate. A No. 6 sizing nated § 1.49, reading substantially as Notice is hereby given in accordance plate shall be a laminated metal plate follows: tn section 4 of the Administrative Pro- 0.142 inch thick with a top lamina 0.051 § 1.49 Denial of trading privileges; S r e Act (5 u -s-c- 1003) that the De- inch thick perforated with round holes suspended or revoked registrations; thA^?en^’ Pursuant to the aforesaid au- 0.0937 (%4> inch in diameter which are employment in similar capacity. S ty{ i8 considering amending the %2 inch from center to center, and a (a) Denial of trading privileges. Dur­ Jjeral Meat Grading Regulations (7 bottom lamina 0.091 inch thick without ing the effective period of any order ar\Snkpart A, as amended), perforations. The perforations of each of the Secretary of Agriculture denying August 1. 1959, to suspend the row in the top lamina shall be staggered trading privileges on contract markets rp„„,ar.meat grading service under said ifrrelation to the adjacent rows. to any person, no futures commission erartiac.tl°?S,for the determination of the 3r Broken kernels, § 68.303(a) : Con­ merchant or member of a contract mar­ mutt««01 lamb> yearling mutton, and sideration will be given to an alternative ket shall knowingly employ such person Unifprt rmal hearing having been luea less the lands have already been classi­ Regulations. fied upon consideration of an applica­ Ig filing of a notice of <”■ T hos. F. B ritt, ith the Federal Register Di gnergy tion. Any application that is filed will Manager. be considered on its merits. The lands ebruary 2, 1959, the -Atom* _ ceDSs ommission has issued pub- will not be subject to occupancy or dis­ [F.R. Doc. 59-4469; Filed, May 27, 1959; •- r. rn in the 101»* V position until they have been classified. 8:47 &.m.] Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4311 lished in that notice, to University of Agency System, Skycoach System and after said date the declaration, as filed Florida authorizing possssion and op­ Irving E. Hermann and Ida Mae Her­ or as amended, may be permitted to be­ eration of an Argonaut-type training and mann. come effective as provided in Rule 23 research reactor located on the campus Notice is hereby given, pursuant to of the rules and regulations promulgated of the University of Florida in Gaines­ the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, that a under the Act, or the Commission may ville, Florida. Notice of the proposed hearing in the above-entitled matter is grant exemption from such rules as pro­ action was published in the F ederal assigned to be held on July 7, 1959, at vided in Rules 20(a) and 100 thereof, or Register on February 4, 1959, 24 F.R. 10:00 a.m., e.d.s.t., in Room 911, Univer­ take such other action as it may deem 820. sal Building, Connecticut and Florida appropriate. Dated at Germantown, Md., this 21st Avenues NW., Washington, D.C., before By the Commission. day of May 1959. Examiner John A. Cannon. Dated at Washington, D.C., May 25, [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, For the Atomic Energy Commission. 1959. Secretary. R, L. K irk, [F.R. Doc. 59-4475; Filed, May 27, 1959; Deputy Director, Division of [seal] F rancis W. B rown, 8:47 a.m.] Licensing and Regulation. > Chief Examiner. [F.R. Doc. 59-4455; Filed, May 27, 1959; [F.R. Doc. 59-4494; Filed, May 27, 1959; 8:45 a.m.] 8:51 a.m.] [File No. 24NY-4791] BROOKRIDGE DEVELOPMENT CORP. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Order Temporarily Suspending Ex­ [Docket 10461] COMMISSION ~ emption, State of Reasons Therefor, RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC. and Notice ^of Opportunity for [File No. 70-3799] Hearing Notice of Prehearing Conference CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS CO. May 22, 1959. In the matter of the increased valua­ I. Brookridge Development Corpora­ tion and C.O.D. charges proposed by Notice of Proposed Execution of Re­ tion (issuer),, a Delaware corporation, Railway Express Agency, Inc. funding Bond by Holding Company 901 Seneca Avenue, Ridgewood, Queens, Notice is hereby given, that a prehear­ New York, filed with the Commission on ing conference in the above-entitled as Surety for Public Utility Sub­ December 19, 1958, a notification on matter is assigned to be held on June 2, sidiary Form 1-A, and subsequently filed an 1959, at 10:00 a.m., e.d.s.t., in Room 911, May 21, 1959. amendment thereto, relating to a pro­ Universal Building, Connecticut and Notice is hereby given that Consoli­ posed offering of $200,000 principal Florida Avenues NW., Washington, D.C., dated Natural Gas Company (“Consoli­ amount of fifteen-year 6 percent con­ before Examiner F. Merritt Ruhlen. dated”), a registered holding company, vertible debentures due January 1, 1974, Dated at Washington, D.C., May 25 has filed a declaration pursuant to the for the purpose of obtaining an exemp­ 1959, Ftiblic Utility Holding Company Act of tion from the registration requirements 1935 (“Act”), designating section 12(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, [seal] F rancis W. B rown, of the Act and Rule 45 thereunder as pursuant to the provisions of section Chief ~Examiner. applicable to the proposed transaction, 3(b) thereof and Regulation A promul­ [PR. Doc. 59-4492; Filed, May 27, 1959; which is summarized as follows : gated thereunder. 8:51 a.m.] On December 10, 1958, Consolidated’s II. The Commission has reasonable wholly owned public-utility subsidiary cause to believe that: Hope Natural Gas Company (“Hope”) A. The terms and conditions of Regu­ filed new rate schedules with the Public lation A have not been complied with, in [Docket 9925] Service Commission of West Virginia that: providing for rate increases approxi­ 1. The notification on Form 1-A fails transcontinental, s .a . mating $1,880,000 per year, allegedly to set forth the name and address of Notice of Prehearing Conference necessitated by increased operating each predecessor and affiliate of the costs. By action of the State commis­ issuer, as required by Item 2; Notice is hereby given that a preheai sion the effectiveness of the new rates 2. The offering circular fails to include maHC01^ereilce *n above-entitle was suspended until May 15, 1959. The a reasonably itemized statement of the matter is assigned to be held on June new rates may now become effective purposes for which the proceeds of the f ie S i°:S,° am> e-d-s t- in Room 91 upon the filing by Hope of a bond in the offering are to be used and the order of F l3 a a BmldinS> Connecticut an amount of $1,880,000, with satisfactory priority in which the proceeds will be b ! E i Venues Nw-> Washington, D.C surety, for the due and proper payment used for such purposes, as required by re Examiner Curtis C. Hendersoi of any refunds which the State commis­ Item 6(a) of Schedule I; ^Dated at Washington, D.C., May 2! sion may order. The State commission 3. The offering circular fails to disclose has indicated that Consolidated may the arrangements for the return of funds sign as surety for Hope. to subscribers if all of the securities to SEALl F rancis W. B rown, Consolidated proposes without fee or be offered are not sold, or if there are ip Chief Examiner. other consideration to sign such bond as no such arrangements, the failure to so Doc. 59-4493; Filed, May 27, 1959; Hope’s surety to save the cost of secur­ state, as required by Item 6(b) of 8:51 a.m.] ing an outside corporate surety. Schedule I ; Notice is further given that any in­ 4. The offering circular fails to dis­ terested person may, not later than close the options to which the officers of June 2, 1959, at 5:30 p.m., rëquest the the issuer are presently entitled, as re­ liJucKet No. 9476] Commission in writing that a hearing be quired by Item 10 of Schedule I; U a1.^ 0 STATES OVER held on such matter, stating the nature 5. The offering circular fails to dis­ AIRLINES, INC., ET of his interest, the reasons for such re­ close the percentage of outstanding'se­ quest, and the issues of fact or law curities of the issuer which will be held Notice of Hearim raised by said declaration which he de­ by officers, directors, and promoters as sires to controvert; or he may request a group, and the percentage of such se­ of United1?? ? 0f the forma] that he be notified if the Commission curities which will be held by the public, agai^t r r S ? ? ° verseas Ai should order a hearing thereon. Any if all the securities to be offered are sold 4 Airlines, such request should be addressed: Secre­ and the respective amounts of cash paid tary, Securities and Exchange Commis­ therefor by such group and the public, * Inc., Transcontinenl sion, Washington 25, D.C. At any time as required by Item 9(d) of Schedule I; 4312 NOTICES

6. The offering circular fails to disclose sible misleading inference that the state­ unlawful; that it prescribe tariff condi­ any material relationship between the ments were certified when in fact they tions eliminating such limitations there­ issuer and the underwriter, as required were not. from upon the quantities of natural gas by Item 5 of Schedule I; III. It is ordered, Pursuant to Rulewhich shall deliver to 7. The offering circular fails to dis­ 261(a) of the general rules and regula­ Laclede, and prescribe a higher limita­ close all direct and indirect interests of tions under the Securities Act of 1933, tion upon terms and conditions that will all directors, officers, and controlling per­ as amended, that the exemption under be just and reasonable. sons in the issuer or its affiliates and in Regulation A be, and it is hereby, tem­ On March 23,1959, Mississippi filed its any material transactions to which the porarily suspended. answer and objections to said complaint issuer or its predecessors or affiliates was Notice is hereby given that any per­ in which it contended that its existing or is to be a party, as required by Item son having any interest in the matter tariff limitations and practices upon the 9(c) of Schedule I; may file with the Secretary of the Com­ quantities of natural gas it sells and de­ 8. The offering circular fails to include mission a written request for hearing livers to Laclede is, if at all, an issue in a profit and loss statement and analysis within thirty days after the entry of this a pending rate matter before this Com­ of surplus for the year ended December order; that within twenty days after re­ mission, Docket No. G-15174. Further, 31,1957, as required by Item 11 of Sched­ ceipt of such request the Commission Mississippi moved to dismiss Laclede’s ule I; will, or at any time upon its own mo­ complaint on the ground that there is no 9. The amount of securities proposed tion may, set the matter down for hear­ statutory authority for the filing of a to be offered and the amount sold in vio­ ing at a place to be designated by the complaint by a gas-distributing company lation of section 5(a) of the Securities Commission for the purpose of deter­ against a natural-gas company for the Act of 1933, as amended, exceeds the mining whether this order of suspen­ purpose of determining the sales capacity $300,000 ceiling limitation set forth in sion should be vacated or made perma­ of the pipeline of such natural-gas com­ Rule 254 of Regulation A; nent, without prejudice, however, to the pany. On March 31, 1959, Laclede filed 10. The notification on Form 1-A fails consideration and presentation of addi­ its reply to the answer and motion of to disclose all sales of unregistered se­ tional matters at the hearing; that if no Mississippi. curities by the issuer, and any director, hearing is requested and none is ordered Mississippi sells and delivers natural officer, promoter, or principal security by the Commission, this order shall be­ gas tq Laclede pursuant to a contract holder of the issuer or underwriter within come permanent on the thirtieth day dated October 2, 1947, which is on file one year prior to the filing of the notifi­ after its entry and shall remain in effect with this Commission. Upon the filing cation, as required by Item 9. unless or until it is modified or vacated of Mississippi’s FPC Gas Tariff, Original B. The notification on Form 1-A andby the Commission; and that notice of Volume No. 1, which became effective the offering circular contain untrue the time and place for said hearing will July 1, 1949, certain specific provisions statements of material facts and omit to be promptly given by the Commission. of said contract were made effective as a service agreement, subject to the ap­ state material facts necessary in order By the Commission. to make the statements made in the light plicable provisions of Mississippi’s Tariff. of the circumstances under which they [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, Third Revised Sheets Nos. 18a and 18b are made not misleading, particularly Secretary. and Second Revised Sheet No. 18c of with respect to: Mississippi’s Tariff fix 330,000 Mcf as the 1. The failure to disclose in the notifi­ [F.R. Doc. 59-4476; Filed, May 27, 1959; maximum quantity of natural gas to be cation and the offering circular the se­ 8:48 a.m.] delivered to Laclede,as its stated demand. curity holdings of the officers and di­ Laclede contends that it has repeatedly rectors of the issuer; requested Mississippi to increase its de­ 2. The failure to disclose in the offer­ mand, but that Mississippi has consist­ ing circular the market position of the ently refused to do so. Laclede contends, underwriter in the issuer’s securities and [Docket No. G-16504 etc.] in effect, that the maintenance of a re­ the effect of the underwriter’s participa­ CITY OF RED BUD, ILL., ET AL. strictive limitation upon the quantities of tion in the market on the market price of natural gas it may purchase and receive the issuer’s securities; Order Instituting Investigation, Deny­ from Mississippi in its FPC Gas Tariff is 3. The failure to disclose in the notifi­ ing Motion to Dismiss, and Con­ unlawful. . Mississippi’s contention—that we lacs cation on Form 1-A the sale of securities solidating Proceedings by officers, directors, promoters, princi­ authority to investigate and, if we fihdijj pal security holders or underwriters in May 21, 1959. necessary, to prescribe changes m• violation of section 5 of the Act;' In the matters of City of Red Bud, classification, rules, regulations, or prac­ 4. The inclusion in “Organization Ex­ , Docket No. G-16504; MidSouth- tices in connection with its rate sched­ pense” in the balance sheet under the Gas Company, Docket No. G-17567; ule—has been previously considered dj caption “Other Assets” of the amount of Natural Gas Improvement District No. 2 this Commission. In the Matter of ti y $60,000 representing underwriting dis­ of Ashley County, Arkansas, Docket No. of Detroit, Michigan, et al. v. Panna«*»j count in connection with the sale of G-17942; Illinois Power Company, Doc­ Eastern Pipe Line Company, et al., 300,000 shares of common stock under an ket No. G-17984; St. Charles Gas Corp., FPC 196, 204, this matter was fully con­ earlier Regulation A filing; Docket No. G-18405; Laclede Gas Com­ sidered. In that opinion, the Comm« 5. The inclusion in the consolidated pany, complainant, v. Mississippi River sion said: income statement of dividends received Fuel Corporation, defendant; Docket.No. By contentions of certain parties to ® from subsidiaries; G-17832. proceeding that the Commission is 6. The inclusion in the December 31, On February 13,1959, the Laclede Gas authority to amend, alter, or chang ^ 1958, consolidated balance sheet of Company (Laclede) filed, in Docket No. schedule provisions providing ^or tiyes livery by Panhandle of specified cQn. $176,478.86 described as “Investment in G-17832, a complaint with the Commis­ of gas, which provisions are embodie [n Subsidiaries”; sion against Mississippi River Fuel Cor­ tracts between the parties, it is being ^ 7. The failure^ to state properly cur­ poration (Mississippi). The - complaint effect that the contract provisions m rent liabilities by not including therein alleges, among other things, that certain held inviolate against the statu y Act_ the portion of long-term debt payable provisions of the FPC Gas Tariff of lation provided for by the 1]t merit, within one year; Mississippi and the practices of Missis­ Such contentions are clearly witn entere(j 8. The inclusion in the consolidated sippi thereunder impose limitations upon since such contracts, even thoug into prior to the enactment of nroVisions income statement of the full year’s op­ the quantities of natural gas sold and Gas Act, are clearly subject to tn p pUpiic erations of a subsidiary acquired late in delivered by Mississippi to Laclede—a of that Act and our regulation i the year with a consequent overstate­ present customer of Mississippi—which interest. Union Dry Goods Co. * ^eera ment of consolidated net income for the are unjust, unreasonable, unduly dis­ Public Service Corp., 248 U.S. 3 1 > „51 U.S. year; criminatory, and' preferential. Laclede Transp. Co. v. Railroad Commiss * ^ 9. The presentation of the issuer’s asks that the Commission find the re­ 228. In the Union Dry Goods CompwyCourt financial statements on stationery of strictive limitations in Mississippi’s it was aptly stated by the Sup certified public accountants and the pos­ tariff and the practices thereunder to be of the United States: Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 431i Thus it will he seen that the case of the The Commissions finds: [Docket No. G-18139] plaintiff in error is narrowed to the claim (1) On the basis of the data presently that reasonable rates, fixed by a state in an available to the Commission, and the MIDWEST NATURAL GAS CORP. appropriate exercise of its. police power, are invalid for the reason that if given effect they contentions related in the pleadings re­ Notice of Application will supersede the rates designated in the ferred to above in Docket No. G-17832, private contract between the parties to the it is appropriate that the Commission M ay 21,1959. suit, entered into prior to the making of the institute an investigation into the stated Take notice that Midwest Natural Gas order by the Railroad Commission. demand limitations embodied in Missis­ Corporation (Midwest) (Applicant) filed Except for the seriousness with which this sippi’s existing FPC Gas Tariff, and any an application on March 23, 1959, pur­ claim has been asserted and is now pursued rule, regulation, practice, or contract suant to section 7(a) of the Natural Gas into this court, the law with respect to it affecting such limitations, and specifi­ Act for an order directing Texas Gas would be regarded as so settled as not to merit further discussion. cally concerning the issues raised by the Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) That private contract rights must yield to complaint, answer, and reply referred to establish physical connection of its the public welfare, where the latter is ap­ to above. facilities with those which Applicant pro­ proximately declared and defined and the (2) Good cause has been shown to poses to construct, and to sell and deliver two conflict, has been often decided by this consolidate the proceedings in Docket to Applicant volumes of natural gas for court. Nos. G-17832 and G-18405 with the prior distribution and resale in the City of We find nothing in the Court’s decision consolidated proceedings in Docket Nos. Salem, , and environs, as here­ in United Gas Pipe Line v. Mobile Gas G-16504, et al. for purposes of hearing inafter described and as more fully rep­ Service Corp., 350 U.S. 322, contrary to ' and determination. resented in the application, which is on the above. Accordingly, Mississippi’s The Commission orders: file with the Commission and open to motion to dismiss should be denied. (A) Pursuant to the authority con­ public inspection. By its notice issued April 27, 1959, the tained in, and subject to the jurisdiction The application states that there is Commission consolidated the proceedings conferred upon the Commission by sec­ presently no gas distribution system in involving applications filed pursuant to tions 5, 14, 15, and 16 of the Natural the City of Salem except for bottled gas. section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act in Gas Act, and the Commission’s rules of Applicant proposes to construct and the above-designated Docket Nos. G- practice and procedure, an investigation operate approximately 16.1 miles of 5- 16504, G-17567, G-17942, and G-17984 is hereby instituted upon the complaint inch transmission lateral to extend from (Docket Nos. G-16504, et al.) and sched­ filed on February 13,1959 by Laclede Gas a point of connection with Texas Gas’ uled a hearing to commence in such con­ Company against Mississippi River Fuel 16-inch pipeline in Orange County, In­ solidated proceedings on June 15,1959. Corporation in Docket No. G-17832 con­ diana, southeastward to the town border On May 5, 1959, St. Charles Gas Corp. cerning the issues raised by said com­ of Salem. In addition, Applicant will (St. Charles) filed a motion to consoli­ plaint, answer, and reply. construct and operate the necessary dis­ date the proceeding in Docket No. G- , (B) The motion to dismiss filed by tribution facilities. 18405 with the proceedings in the afore­ Mississippi River Fuel Corporation in Applicant estimates the natural gas mentioned consolidated proceedings. In Docket No. G-17832 on March 23, 1959, requirements in the City of Salem as support of its application, St. Charles is hereby denied. follows: alleges that the proceeding in Docket No. (C) The motion filed by St. Charles G-18405 and the proceedings in the con­ on* May 5, 1959 to consolidate the pro­ Require­ ceeding in Docket No. G-18405 with the Year of service No. of cus­ ments in Annual solidated proceedings in Docket Nos. tomers Mcf peak (M6504, et al. involve common questions aforementioned prior consolidated pro­ • day of law and fact and therefore should be ceedings in Docket Nos. G-16504, et al. consolidated for purposes of hearing and is hereby granted. 1...... 579 550 78,141 determination. (D) Pursuant to the authority con­ 2...... 765 850 119,430 tained in the Natural Gas Act, subject 3._...... '...... 943 1,260 173,300 Inasmuch as the aforementioned con­ 4_...... 1,100 1,470 202; 100 solidated proceedings in Docket Nos. to the jurisdiction conferred upon the 5...... lj 267 1,630 223,400 -16504, et al. and the proceedings in Federal Power Commission therein, in- Docket Nos. G-17832 and G-18405 in- eluding particularly sections 5, 14, 15, Applicant estimates the total cost of oive common questions of law and fact, and 16 thereof, and pursuant to the Com­ constructing its facilities to be $528,800, cni vi appr°Priate and expedient to con- mission’s rules and regulations (18 CFR which it proposes to finance through the r the Proceedings in Docket Nos. Chapter I ) , the above-designated Docket issuance of common stock and mortgage 7832 and G-18405 with the prior con- Nos. G-16504, G-17567, G-17942, G- bonds. r proceedings in Docket Nos.- 17984, and G-18405, and the investiga­ On April 21, 1959, Texas Gas advised ^-16504’ et al. for purposes of hearing tion proceeding hereby instituted in the Commission by its answer to Mid­ ana determination. Docket No. G-17832 are hereby consoli­ dated for purposes of hearing and west’s proposal that it had no objection ®as^d upon the investigation and after to rendering the service upon the terms determination. and conditions set forth in the answer. rnmJ^e^ring 88 may be required, the (E) A hearing will be held on June Protests or petitions to intervene may tinS? 1188!.011 -WiU determine if the limita- 15,1959 at 10:00 a.m., e.d.t., in a Hearing be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ PPp ®mb°dieid in Mississippi’s existing Room of the Federal Power Commission, sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accordance unino(.as tariff pertaining to Laclede are 441 G Street NW., Washington, D.C., with the rules of practice and procedure natrm/ 'unreasonable, unduly discrimi- concerning the matters involved in and (18 CFR 1,8 or 1.10) on or before June S i f , Preferential and- if such be the issues presented by these Consoli­ 15, 1959. i ordSf rf1’WlU’by. appropriate order or dated proceedings. (F) Protests or petitions to intervene [SEAL] J oseph H. Gutride, titaitatinn*680**156 lust and reasonable may be filed with the Federal Power Secretary. I service Ha’ -«erms and conditions of Commission, Washington 25, D.C., in PracticP?^ 81fiCatlons’ rules’ regulations, [F.R. Doc. 59-4461; Filed, May 27, 1959; accordance with the rules of practice 8:46 a.m.] I and in fn,.»! contracts to be observed and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on °rder. 6’ and wdl fix the same by or before June 1,1959. (G) Interested State commissions stitute °f this °rder shall con- may participate as provided by §§ 1.8 and [Docket No. G-13262] PUcaUon n,P°tlCe5 the filin^ °f an ap- 1.37(f) of the Commission’s rules of practice and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 and LAKE SHORE PIPE LINE CO. Natural Gas Arfu1 to Section 7(a) of the 1.37(f)). « Aprilts f 959by Th.Chari S GaS C°rp- Notice of Amended Application and 18 on file With said application By the Commission. Date of Hearing ** inspected in , Jpommission and ca n [ seal] J oseph H. G utride, R°om of the Comthe Public Reference Secretary. May 21, 1959. | 11141 business h om ! 881011 durlng its reg- [F.R. Doc. 59-4459; Filed, May 27, 1959; Take notice that on September 12,1957, 8:45 a.m.] Lake Shore Pipe Line Company (Appli- 4314 NOTICES cant) filed in Docket No. G-13262 an ap­ 1959. Failure of any party to appear at Applicants to appear or be represented plication pursuant to section 7(c) of the and participate in the hearing shall be at the hearing. Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public construed as waiver of and concurrence Protests or petitions to intervene may convénience and necessity authorizing in omission herein of the intermediate be filed with the Federal Power Com­ an increase of natural gas service to two decision procedure in cases where a re­ mission, Washington 25, D.C., in accord­ existing customers, The Lake Shore Gas quest therefor is made. ance with the rules of practice and Company (Laké Shore Gas) and the City [ seal] J oseph H. Gutride, procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or of Painesville, (Painesville), notice Secretary. before June 19, 1959. Failure of any of which application was published in the party to appear at and participate in F ederal R egister on February 26, 1958 [F.R. Doc. 59r4462; Filed, May 27, 1959; the hearing shall be construed as waiver (23 F.R. 1208), setting shortened proce­ 8:46 a.m.] of and concurrence in omission herein dure hearing thereon for March 25,1958. of the intermediate decision procedure This hearing was postponed indefinitely in cases where a request therefor is by notice published in the F ederal R eg­ made. ister [Docket No. G-14146] on March 21, 1958 (23 F.R. 1908). [seal] J oseph H. Gutride, On July 23,1958, Applicant filed a first Secretary. amendment to the aforesaid application, SHAWVER-ARMOUR, INC., ET AL. [F.R. Doc. 59-4460; Filed, May 27, 1959; seeking authorization to rearrange the Notice of Application and Date of proposed increased deliveries of natural 8:45 a.m.] gas to Lake Shore Gas and Painesville Hearing , and certain other existing eastern Ohio M ay 21, 1959. customers as follows: Take notice that Shawver-Armour, [Docket No. G-18182] [In thousand cubic feet] Inc., a Kansas corporation with a prin­ cipal place of business in Wichita, Kan­ UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO. Present Increase Proposed sas, filed application as operator on De­ Notice of Application and Date of Customers alloca­ (decrease) alloca­ cember 26, 1957, in Docket No. G-14146, tion requested tion for and on behalf of the corporation and Hearing H. A. Mayer, Joe Johnson, C. J. Slawson, May 21, 1959. The East Ohio Gas Co. (G-l) (transfer from Wilcox Oil Company, Southwest Grease Take notice that on March 27, 1959, Lake Shore Gas Co.). 17,210 6,059- 23,269 and Oil Company, Inc., and Western Rig The East Ohio Gas Co. United Gas Pipe Line Company (Appli­ (CD-I) (transferfrom Company, Inc., pursuant to section 7(b) cant) filed in Docket No. G-18182 an Lake County Gas of the Natural Gas Act for permission application pursuant to section 7(b) of Co.)...... 3,200 4,000 ... 7,200 and approval to abandon service to Cities City of Painesville, the Natural Gas Act for permission and Ohio..------^ 760 851 3,611 Service Gas Company (Cities Service) approval to abandon certain facilities Conneaut Valley Gas from a lease located in the Brumley Co...... 1,711 0 1,711 formerly used to deliver and sell natural Diamond Alkali Co__ 8,000 (4,000) 4,000 Field, Sedgwick County, Kansas, covered gas directly to the International Paper by a sales contract dated April 14, 1956, Totals______32,881 6,910 39,791 Company near Bastrop, , all as between Applicants and Cities Service, more fully set forth in the application on file as Shawver-Armour, Inc. (Oper­ which is on file with the Commission and The Commission’s order issued Janu­ ator), et al., FPC Gas Rate Schedule open to public inspection, ary 28, 1959,“ in Docket No. G-11107 No. 1, subject to the jurisdiction of the The facilities to be abandoned consist (Docket Nos. G-2306 et al.) authorized Commission, all as more fully stated in of two dual 8-inch meter and regulator Tennessee Gas Transmission Company to the application on file with the Commis­ sell sufficient additional gas to Lake sion and open to public inspection. stations and approximately 100 feet oi Shore Gais to take care of the increased Applicants state that the lease well 8-inch branch pipeline, together with ap­ deliveries for which authorization is (Shawver-Armour, Inc.’s Well No. 1 purtenances. T ie pipeline is attached to sought herein. Jones), which was producing gas from United’s 12-inch lateral line extending This matter is one that should be dis­ the Mississippian limestone formation from Perryville to Bastrop. posed of as promptly as possible under became depleted prior to February 25, Applicant states that the contract un­ the applicable rules and regulations and 1957. der which it supplied gas to Interna­ Applicants were authorized on March tional Paper Company expired by its ow to that end: terms on January 1,1959, that Take further notice that, pursuant to 13,1957, in Docket No. G-10404 to render ceased, that the facilities to be ab the authority contained in and Subject the service now proposed to be aban­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the doned. doned are no longer useful in their p This matter is one that should be dis­ ent location, and that said facilities Federal Power Commission by sections 7 be removed and used at other 1°®* . and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the posed of as promptly as possible under on Applicant’s system when requir • Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ the applicable rules and regulations and cedure, a hearing will be held on June to that end: This matter is one that should be 16, 1959, at 9:30 a.m., e.d.s.t., in a Hear­ Take further notice that, pursuant to posed of as promptly as P0881*?}® „n(j ing Room of the Federal Power Com­ the authority contained in and subject the applicable rules and regulation mission, 441 G Street NW., Washington, to the jurisdiction conferred upon the to that end: .nt ta D.C., concerning the matters involved in Federal Power Commission p y sections 7 Take further notice that, purs and the issues presented by such appli­ and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and the the authority contained in and su j cation: Provided, however, That the Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ the jurisdiction conferred upon i , Commission may, after a non-contested cedure, a hearing will be held on June eral Power Commission by sections hearing, dispose of the proceedings pur­ 29, 1959, at 9:30 a.m., e.d.s.t., in a Hear­ 15 of the Natural Gas Act, and tne suant to the provisions of § 1.30(c) (1) or ing Room of the Federal Power Commis­ mission’s rules and practice a ^ (2) of the Commission’s rules of practice sion, 441 G Street NW., Washington, cedure, a hearing will be held o earing and procedure. Under the procedure D.C., concerning the matters involved in 1959, at 9:30 a.m., e.d.s.t., in a n herein provided for, unless otherwise ad­ and the issues presented by such appli­ Room of the Federal vised, it will be unnecessary for Appli­ cation: Provided, however, That the 441 G Street NW., Washington, ^ cant to appear or be represented at the Commission may, after a non-contested concerning the matters in7°;!.nljCation: hearing. hearing, dispose of the proceedings pur­ the issues presented by such Protests or petitions to intervene may suant to the provisions of § 1.30(c) (1) Provided, however, That thee ^ be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ or (2) of the Commission’s rules of prac­ may, after a non-contested he ^ ^ sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accordance tice and procedure. Under the pro­ pose of the proceedings pnrs 0f the with the rules of practice and procedure cedure herein provided for, unless other­ provisions of § 1.30(c) (1) andpro- (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before June 12, wise advised, it will be unnecessary for Commission’s rules and practi Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4315 cedure. Under the procedure herein Sinclair’s sales are covered by separate 1959. Failure of any party to appear at provided for, unless otherwise advised, it contracts dated August 1, 1947, between and participate in the hearing shall be will be unnecessary for Applicant to ap­ Shell and Sinclair Prairie Oil Company construed as waiver of and concurrence pear or be represented at the hearing. (Sinclair’s predecessor in interest) as in omission herein of the intermediate Protests or petitions to intervene may sellers, and Phillips, as buyer. decision procedure in cases where a re­ be filed with the Federal Power Com­ In support of their proposed termina­ quest therefor is made. mission, Washington 25, D.C., in accord­ tions of service, Sinclair et al., in Docket ance with the rules of practice and pro­ No. G-16755 and Sinclair in Docket No. [ seal] J oseph H. Gutride, cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before G-16779 state that that acreage covered Secretary. June 12, 1959. Failure of any party to in each of said dockets has become un­ [F.R. Doc. 59-4464; Filed, May 27, 1959; appear at and participate in the hearing productive, that the well thereon has 8:46 a.m.] shall be construed as waiver of and con­ been abandoned, and that the lease currence in omission herein of the inter­ and/or leases have expired. Shell in mediate decision procedure in cases Docket No. G-16873 states that the A. S. where a request therefor is made. Guleke Well No. 1, from which Shell’s [Docket Nos. G-13246, G-16998] share of gas was delivered to Phillips, [SEAL] J oseph H.. Gtjtride, MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. Secretary. was plugged and abandoned on June 14, 1958, by Sinclair, Lease Operator, for Notice of Application and Date of [P.R. Doc. 59-4463; Piled, May 27, 1959; the afore-mentioned reasons. 8:46 a.m.] As an exhibit to their application in Hearing Docket No. G-16755, Sinclair et al., sub­ May 22, 1959. mitted copies of a cancellation agree­ Take notice that on November i9, [Docket No. G-16755 etc.] ment dated December 30, 1957, between 1958, Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Housh, Sinclair, O’Donnell, Russell, Mat­ Company (Michigan Wisconsin), a Dela­ SINCLAIR OIL & GAS CO. ET AL. lage, Faulkner and Wittman, as sellers, ware corporation, (1) filed an applica­ and Tennessee, as buyer, providing for tion for a certificate of public conven­ Notice of Applications and Date of the termination of the afore-mentioned ience and necessity in Docket No. G— Hearing contract of April 30, 1954, with Ten­ 16998 authorizing the sale and delivery nessee. May 21, 1959. in interstate commerce of an additional Sinclair, as a part of its application 40.000 Mcf of natural gas (per average In the matters of Sinclair Oil & Gas in Docket No. G-16799, filed a letter Company, et al., Docket No. G-16755; day) above the quantities previously au­ agreement dated August 8,1958, between thorized in Docket Nos. G-13246, et al., Sinclair Oil & Gas Company, Operator, Shell and Sinclair, as sellers, and Phil­ Docket No. G-16779; Shell Oil Company, and for, authorization to construct cer­ lips, as buyer, executed by Phillips on tain additional facilities which, accord-' Docket No. G-16873. September 23, 1958, providing for the Take notice that Sinclair Oil & Gas ing to the application, will enable Mich­ cancellation of Shell-Sinclair-Phillips igan Wisconsin to deliver and sell the Company et al. (Sinclair et al.) ,* on Oc­ contract of August 1, 1947. tober 17, 1958, in Docket No. G-16755; additional 40,000 Mcf per day of Laverne Sinclair et al., successors in interest to gas to its existing customers; and (2) in Sinclair on October 24, 1958, in Docket Republics, were authorized on September **?• G—16779 ; and Shell Oil Company Docket Nos. G-13246, et al., moved that 8, 1955, in Docket No. G-8493 to sell gas the certificate of public convenience and iShell), on November 3, 1958, in Docket from the Ward Gas Unit to Tennessee, No. G-16873, filed applications for per­ necessity issued by the Commission’s in addition to other sales covered therein. order of June 20, 1958, authorizing the cussion and approval to abandon service Sinclair on December 22, 1954, in Pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural designated “A” and “B” facilities be mod­ Docket No. G-2910 and Shell on June 4, ified* to authorize the construction and i f * * 85 hereinafter described, sub- 1956, in Docket No. G-5091 were author­ operation of loop lines and compressor E t0,,the jurisdiction of the Commis- ized to sell their shares of natural gas ¡2 » 88 more fully represented in the facilities to expand the capacity of Mich­ from the A. S. Guleke Lease to Phillips. igan Wisconsin’s mainline to enable it applications which are on file These related matters should be heard JKhwe Commission and open to public to transport in interstate commerce on a consolidated record and disposed of 80.000 Mcf of natural gas per day from as promptly as possible under the ap­ miÏÏÜ respfctive applications seek per­ the Laverhe Field in Harper County, in mission and approval for: plicable rules and regulations and to that lieu of the 40,000 Mcf per day authorized, end: all as more fully set forth in the motion G et ü1 Socket No. Take further notice that, pursuant to and application which are on file with see roe Îi? abandon service to Tennes- the authority contained in and subject to the Commission and open for public ne^ % Transmission Company (Ten- the jurisdiction conferred upon the Fed­ inspection. Noblp i r?in î?e Ward Gas Unit, Cecil eral Power Commission by sections 7 and On April 24, 1959, the Commission al­ which S r i ’ between C. * M. a hearing will be held on June 2?5, 1959,’ consin from Laverne Field. Michigan Tennlsee, “ SeUers* and at 9;30 a.m., e.d.s.t., in a hearing room Wisconsin indicates in its present appli­ of the Federal Power Commission, 441 G cation in Docket No. G-16998 that it has audShel?îîfn JS No- G-16779 Street NW., Washington, D.C., concern­ executed additional gas purchase con­ ^ t e spivi^ 0Î et No- G~16873 to ter- ing the matters involved in and the issues tracts in the Laverne Field and that the CompLS'a£ 5 n.t0 , Phillips Petroleum presented by such applications: Provided, gas reserves covered by these contracts, vidual 5n i? hllhP ) from their indi­ however, That the Commission may, plus the additional reserves established te A1 S°Gmekpnî WOrking Interests in after a non-contested hearing, dispose by further development of the acreage field, Moor? Le4.ase’ West Panhandle of the proceedings pursuant to the pro­ County, Texas. Shell and dedicated to Michigan Wisconsin under visions of § 1.30(c) (1) or (2) of the its original contracts, now provide Mich­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ igan Wisconsin with a gas supply of 1 EaS°Cket N°- G-l?755 are cedure. Under the procedure herein pro­ 80.000 Mcf per day from the Laverne °il & Gas Cornnfo+ftern CorP°ration, Alban vided for unless otherwise advised, it will Associates. ¿ T tl0n and pifty-First Street Field. Authorization is now sought in be unnecessary for Applicants to appear Docket No. G-16998 to transport and sell 116 Lawrence^ GyrvvT p?fties to thé contract or be represented at the hearing. these additional supplies. ??ce A. R u lp n ^ n eU (O’Donnell), Clar- Protests or petitions to intervene may In its motion filed in Docket Nos. (Matlage) c b A* G. Matlage be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ G-13246, et al., Michigan Wisconsin re­ B' W itten .w u f kner (^uikner), Paul sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accordance quests a modification of its “B” facili­ Pul>“« Be- with the rules of practice and procedure ties to install loop lines to transport the (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before June 15, 80.000 Mcf per day of-Laverne gas in 4316 NOTICES lieu of the intermediate compression sta­ the Safety Convention, Regulation 5 or 6, tions which would have permitted the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Chapter IV of the Safety Convention, and transportation of 4,0,000 Mcf per day of Regulation 12(b), Chapter V of the Laverne gas. Michigan Wisconsin pro­ COMMISSION Safety Convention, or Article 6 of the poses to delete the nine new intermediate [FCC 59-4751 Great Lakes Agreement: compressor stations provided for in the (1) For emergency and renewal ex­ certificate issued on June 20, 1958, and RADIOTELEGRAPH REQUIREMENTS emption of vessels; to substitute therefor additional engines (2) For initial exemption of vessels at existing stations aggregating 16,560 Exemption of Ships subject to Title III, Part III of the Act; horsepower and 353 miles of 24-inch In the matter of amendment of sec­ (3) For initial exemption of vessels of mainline loops. tion 0.292(b) of the Commission’s state­ less than 100 gross tons subject to Title In Docket No. G-16998, Michigan Wis­ ment of delegations of authority con­ III, Part II of the Act or the Safety consin also seeks authorization for addi­ cerning exemption of ships from Convention; tional group “C” facilities1 which it radiotelegraph Requirements of the (4) For exemption from Title III, Part alleges are required to enable Michigan Safety (Convention or the Communica­ II of the Act of vessels operated in the Wisconsin to deliver and sell the addi­ tions Act, or both, to avoid application Gulf of Mexico which participate in oil tional 40,000 Mcf per day of Laverne gas. of more than one radio system require­ well drilling operations when the circum­ These facilities consist of (1) a 20.9 mile ment to individual ships, and to add stances are substantially the same as 16-inch O.D. loop of Michigan Wiscon­ legal references reflecting authority for those in precedent cases decided by the sin’s pipeline from Oshkosh, Wisconsin, ship radio exemptions in general. Commission en banc; and north to the Little Chute tap; (2) 1780 At a session of the Federal Communi­ (5) For initial exemption, in those additional horsepower at its Station 10; cations Commission held at its offices in cases wherein the sole reason for such (3) 2440 additional horsepower at its Washington, D.C., on the 21st day of exemption is to avoid requirements for Wisconsin “A” Station; and <4) 1600 May 1959; more than one basic safety radio system additional horsepower at its Wisconsin The Commission having under con­ on an individual vessel, from the radio­ “B” Station. sideration the necessity for amending telegraph requirements of the Safety In its order of April 24, 1959, modify­ section 0.292(b) of the Commission’s Convention or Title III, Part II of the ing and adopting the initial decision of statement of delegations of authority to Act, or both, of: the Presiding Examiner in Docket Nos. authorize the Chief of the Safety and (a) Individual ocean-going vessels, G-13246, et al., the Commission stated Special Radio Services Bureau, or in his transiting the St. Lawrence Seaway and that the record should be reopened and absence, the Acting Chief of the Bureau, not navigated solely on the Great Lakes, the remaining portion of the proposed to grant or deny requests filed pursuant during the periods while such vessels are Group “C” facilities examined in rela- to Regulation 4 of Chapter I or Regula­ navigated on the Great Lakes and pro­ ■ tion to the final allocation plan in Docket tion 5 of Chapter IV of the Safety of Life vided that exemption is conditioned upon No. G-16998, and evidence specifically at Sea Convention for initial exemption compliance with the provisions of the predicated on such plan be taken in order under certain circumstances of vessels Great Lakes Agreement; to form a more intelligent basis for a transiting the St. Lawrence Seaway from (b) Individual vessels transiting the decision. The remaining portion of the the compulsory radiotelegraph require* St. Lawrence Seaway that are navigated Group “C” facilities not previously au­ ments of Regulation 3, Chapter IV, only between United States Great Lakes thorized by the Examiner in Docket Nos. Safety of Life at Sea Convention, or Part ports and Canadian ports outside the G-13246, et. al., consists of the installa­ II of Title III of the Communications Great Lakes, provided that such vessels tion of an additional 1320 horsepower Act, or both, and to include in that sec­ are not navigated beyond a line running of compression at Station No. 10 and 2400 tion a reference to Regulation 12(b), from Cape Gaspe, Province of Quebec, to horsepower of compression at Wisconsin Chapter V, of the Safety Convention re­ Heath Point, Anticosti Island, and thence “B” Station. lating to exemptions from certain di­ northward to Natashquan Point, Prov­ These related matters should be heard rection-finding requirements; ince of Quebec, and provided further tba* on a consolidated record and disposed of It appearing that the Commission, in while so navigated the vessels comply as promptly as possible under the appli­ passing upon one such request for ex­ with the provisions of the Great Lakes cable rules and regulations and to that emption, has established a general policy Agreement. end: to be followed in granting or denying Released: May 25, 1959. Take further notice that, pursuant to subsequently received similar requests; F ederal Communications the authority contained in and subject and It further appearing that such amend­ ' „ Commission, to the jurisdiction conferred upon the [ seal] Mary Jane Morris, Federal Power Commission by Sections ment is designed to improve the internal Secretary. 4, 5, 7, and 15 of the Natural Gas Act, administration of the Commission’s func­ and the Commission’s rules of practice tions and will facilitate the prompt and [F.R. Doc. 59-4486; Filed, May 27, 1059, orderly handling of the above-described 8:49 a.m.] and procedure, a hearing will be held requests for exemption; and on June 22, 1959, at 10:00 a.m., e.d.s.t., It further appearing that the amend­ in a hearing room of the. Federal Power ment herein ordered relates Xo internal Commission, 441 G Street NW., Wash­ Commission organization and procedure [Mexican List 215] ington, D.C., concerning the matters in­ and, therefore, compliance with the pub­ MEXICAN BROADCAST STATIONS volved in and the issues presented by lic notice and rule making procedures, such applications and complaint. including the provision concerning effec­ ist of Changes, Proposed Changes Protests or petitions to intervene may tive dates, of section 4 of the Adminis­ and Correction in Assignments be filed with the Federal Power Commis­ trative Procedure Act is not required; May 11. 1959‘ sion, Washington 25, D.C., in accord­ and It further appearing, that authority Notification under the pÌ?VÌ^rican ance with the rules of practice and pro­ -art HI, section 2 of the North America cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before for the proposed amendment is contained iff section 5(d)(1) of the Communica­ Regional Broadcasting Agreement. ^ June 10, 1959. tions Act of 1934, as amended; List of changes, proposed cha^ ’ican [ seal] J oseph H. G utride, It is ordered, That effective May 21, orrection in assignments oi ap. Secretary. 1959, section 0.292(b) of the Commis­ troadcast Stations modify«« *jexi- sion’s Statement of Delegations of Au­ endix containing assignmentsb [F.R. Doc. 59-4465; Filed, May 27, 1959; thority is amended to read as follows: an Broadcast Stations 8:46 a.m.] (b) Applications or requests for ex­ 7214-6) attached to the\re®or^ i 0nal 1 The proposed facilities would be in addi­ emption, pursuant to the provisions of ions of the North American tion to those Group “C” facilities originally section 352(b) and 383 of the Communi­ troadcasting Agreement requested in Docket Nos. G-13246, et aL cations Act, Regulation 4, Chapter I-of Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4317

[Docket No. 12860 etc.; FCC 59M-668] * Expected date Call letters Location Power kw An- Sched- Class of commence- WILLIAM PARMER FULLER, III, ET AL. / ■ tenna ule ment of opera- tion Order Continuing Prehearing 690 kilocycles Conference XEE (correction of error Durango, Durango..__ _ 2 kw D/0.15 kw N. ND U IH Sept. 23,1958 In re applications of William Parmer in Change List No. Fuller, III, Salt Lake City, Utah, Docket 209). No. 12860, File No. BP-11727; James C. 630 kilocycles Wallentine, tr/as Kanab Broadcasting XETS (correction of er­ ND U III July 23,1958 ror in Change List No. Co., Kanab, Utah, Docket No. 12861, 209). File No. BP-11813; L. John Miner, tr/as 660 kilocycles \ Inland Empire Broadcasting Co., Price, XENB (New). Macuspana, Tabasco.'..... ND D II Nov. 11,1959 Utah, Docket No. 12862, File No. BP- 11907; Cache Valley Broadcasting Com­ 670 kilocycles pany (KVNU), Logan, Utah, Docket No. XEEQ (change in time Tapachula, Chiapas...__ lkw ...... ND D II May. 11,1959 12863, File No. BP-12017; for construc­ of operation). tion permits. 680 kilocycles The Hearing Examiner having under XEFO (correction of er­ Chihuahua, Chihuahua... ND D II ror in Change List No. July 23,1958 consideration the above-entitled pro­ 209). ceeding ; 700 kilocycles It appearing that some of the counsel XEDV (correction of er­ Zapopan, Jalisco______lkw ...... ND D have informally notified the Hearing Ex­ ror in Change List No. II Do. aminer that they have hearing commit­ 209). ments which would conflict with the pre- 860 kilocycles. hearing conference presently scheduled XENW (PO: 1450 kc . 1 kw D/0.25 kw N. 250 w U) (correction of ND U H Nov. 11,1959 herein for June 8, 1959; error in Change List It is ordered, This 22d day of May 1959, No. 214). on the Hearing Examiner’s oftn motion, 960 kilocycles that the prehearing conference presently XEHA (PO: 1440 kc Ciudad, Camargo, Chi- 0.25 kw D/0.1 ND U IV Do. scheduled for June 8, 1959 is continued 500 w D/250 w N). huahua. kw N. until June 19,1959, at 10:00 a.m. 1110 kilocycles Released: May 22,1959. XEOQ (change in call Rio Bravo, Tamaulipas... 1 kw...... letters and increase in ND D II May 11,1959 F ederal Communications power). Commission, 1120 kilocycles [seal] Mary J ane Morris, XETR (operation on Ciudad Valles, San Luis 1 kw...... ND D II Do. Secretary. this frequency defini­ Potosi. tive). [F.R. Doc. 59-4488; Filed, May 27, 1959; 1190 kilocycles 8:50 a.m.] XEWK (correction of er­ ror m Change List No. Guadalajara, Jalisco...__ ND U IB Aug. 14,1957 4)5). ltJfl kilocycles [Docket No. 12844 etc.; FCC 59M-666] XELD (New)...... Autlan de Navarro, 1 kw D/0.1 kw N. ND Jalisco. U IV Nov. 11,1959 RICHARD L. DeHART ET AL. X»minow operation with new day power). Tampico, Tamaulipas...... 1 kw D/0.25 kw N. ND U IV Aug. 11,1959 Order Scheduling Further Prehearing 1320 kilocycles Conference •Xm 2 ).(delete assi^ - Ciudad Valles, San Luis 1 kyr D/0.1 kw N. ND Potosi. U IV May 11,1959 . In re applications of Richard L. De­ 1330 kilocycles Hart, Mountlake Terrace, Washington, (P0:SalinaCruz Ciudad Ixtepex, Oaxaca... Docket No. 12844, File No. BP-11312; Ottaca, 500 w U). 1 kw D/0.5 kw N. ND U III % Nov. 11,1959 KVOS, INC. (KVOS), Bellingham, lSlfi kilocycles Washington, Docket No. 12845, File No. &XEIK ( N (PO: e w 250 ) „ „w XJ)'.]¡I Monterrey, Nuevo Leon.. 1 kw D/0.25 kw N. ND U TV Do. BP-11360; Clair Conger Fetterly, tr/as Ciudad Delicias, Chi­ 0.5 kw D/0.25 kw ND U IV Do. Lake Washington Broadcasting Com­ huahua. N. pany, Bothell, Washington-, Docket No. 1360 kilocycles 12846, File No. BP-11390; John W. jXETP news Ciudad Valles, San Luis ND Davis (KPDQ>, Portland, Oregon, Potosi. D III Do. Docket No. 12847, File No. BP-11436; for 1380 kilocycles construction permits for Standard [XEZt Broadcast Stations. Ciudad Hidalgo, Chiapas. 1 kw D/0.25 kw N. ND U IV Do. On the Hearing Examiner’s own mo­ 1400 kilocycles tion, and with the agreement of all counsel who were present at the initial Santa Barbara, Chihua­ hua. 1 kw D/0.2 kw N. ND U IV Nov. 20,1958 prehearing conference in the above-en­ titled proceeding on May 21, 1959: It is Saltillo, Coahuila 0.5 kw D/0.25 Je w ND u IV Nov. 11,1959 N. ordered, This 22d day of May, 1959, that all parties, or their counsel, are directed I48O kilocycles to appear at a further prehearing con­ Zapopan, Jalisco.. 0.25 kw D/0.2 kw ND u IV Do. ference pursuant to § 1.111 of the Com­ N. Cadereyta de Jimenez, 1 kw D/0.5 kw N__ Nl) u III-B May 11,1959 mission’s rules, on Thursday, June 14, Nuevo Leon. 1959, at 2:00 p.m., in the offices of the Commission, Washington, D.C. 1490 kilocycles fXEVz(New). Released: May 22,1959. Acayucan, Veracruz__ 0.25 kw D/0.2 kw ND XJ IV Nov. 11,1959 N. F ederal Communications Commission, (SEAL] F ederal Communications Commission, [seal] Mary Jane M orris, Mary J ane M orris, a Secretary. Secretary. [FJR. Doc. 59-4489; Filed, May 27, 1959; IF.R. Doc. 59-4487; Piled, May 27,1959; 8:49 a.m.] 8:50 a.m.] 4318 NOTICES section U.S. Highway 11 at Tully Center, routes, transporting: Bananas, from INTERSTATE COMMERCE N.Y.; U.S. Highway 11 to Watertown, Philadelphia, Pa., Baltimore, Md., Wee- N.Y.), thence New York Highway 3 and hawken and Jersey" City, N.J., New York, COMMISSION local roads to Camp Drum; (b) from N.Y. and New Haven and Hartford, Jersey City over city streets to junction Conn., to points in Connecticut, Spring- [Notice 19] New Jersey Highway 3, thence over New field, Mass., and points within 15 miles APPLICATIONS FOR MOTOR CARRIER Jersey Highway 3 to the junction of thereof, Boston, Mass., and points within “GRANDFATHER” CERTIFICATE OR U.S. Highway 46, thence over U.S. High­ 30 miles thereof, Southbridge and Fitch­ way 46 to junction of U.S. Highway 611 burg, Mass., Albany, N.Y., Portland, PERMIT at the approach to the Delaware Water Maine, and Providence, R.I. M ay 22, 1959. Gap Bridge, thence over U.S. Highway No. MC 116600 (Sub No. 1), filed De­ The following applications and certain 611 to Scranton, Pa., thence U.S. High­ cember 10, 1958. Applicant: LEWIS othe.rprocedural matters relating thereto way 11 to Watertown, N.Y. (alternate, TRANSPORT LIMITED (a corpora­ are filed under the “grandfather” clause U.S.* Highway 11 to Cortland, N.Y., New tion), 1531 Keele Street, Toronto, On­ of section 7(c) of the Transportation Act York Highway 281 to intersect U.S. tario, Canada. Applicant’s attorney: of 1958. These matters are governed by Highway 11 at Tully Center, N.Y., U.S. William C. Arrison, Bank of Jamestown special rule § 1.243 published in the F ed­ Highway 11 to Watertown, N.Y.), thence Building, Jamestown, N.Y. Grandfather eral R egister issue of January 8, 1959, New York Highway 3 and local roads to authority sought under section 7 of the page 205, which provides, among other Camp Drum; (2) over Routes 1(a) and Transportation Act of 1958 to continue things, that this publication constitutes 1(b)- to Syracuse, N.Y., for interchange to operate as a common carrier, by motor the only notice to interested persons of with connecting carriers; (3) between vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ filing that will be given; that appropriate Watertown, Camp Drum and Syracuse, ing: Frozen fruits, frozen berries, and protests to an application (consisting of N.Y., from Syracuse over U.S. Highway frozen vegetables, from Buffalo, N.Y., an original and six copies each) must be 11 to Watertown, thence New York and points in Niagara, Orleans, Monroe, filed with the Commission at Washing­ Highway 3 and local roads to Camp Genesee, Oswego, Wayne, Steuben, and ton, D.C., within 30 days from the date Drum, serving all intermediate points Chautauqua Counties, N.Y., to ports of of this publication in the F ederal R egis­ on the above specified routes. entry on the boundary between the ter; that failure to so file seasonably No. MC 112779 (Sub No. 1), filed De­ United States and Canada at or near will be construed as a waiver of opposi­ cember 10, 1958. Applicant: HEIDEMA Buffalo and Fort Erie, N.Y. tion and participation in such proceed­ BROTHERS, INC., 166 Gordon Street, Note: Applicant is authorized to conduct ing, regardless of whether or not an Holland, Mich. Grandfather authority operations as a contract carrier in Permit oral hearing is held in the matter; and sought under section 7 of the Transpor­ MC 93476; a proceeding has been instituted that a copy of the protest also shall be tation Act of 1958 to continue to operate under section 212(c) in No. MC 93476 Sub 3, served upon applicant’s representative as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, to determine whether applicant’s status is (or applicant, if no practitioner repre­ over irregular routes, transporting: Fro­ that of a contract or com m on carrier. senting him is named in the notice of zen fruits, frozen berries, and frozen veg­ No. MC 117860, filed November 20, filing). etables, between points in Michigan, Illi­ 1958. Applicant: MONTGOMERY & These notices reflect the operations nois, Indiana, Ohio, and . SLAUGHTER, INC., U.S. Highway 17, described in the applications as filed on No. MC 113951 (Sub 1), filed Decem­ P.O. Box 733, Crescent City, Fla. Grand­ or before the statutory date of Decem­ ber 10, 1958. Applicant: M. D. CRESSY father authority sought under section 7 ber 10, 1958. COMPANY, INC., 10 Temple Street, of the Transportation Act of 1958 to No. MC 46421 (Sub No. 5), filed De­ Charleston (Boston), Mass. Applicant’s continue to operate as a common carrier, cember 8, 1958. Applicant: C. T. VILLA attorney: Raymond E. Bernard, 53 State by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, CARTING CO., INC., 320 Niagara Prop- Street, Room 625, Boston, Mass. Grand­ transporting: Frozen fruits, frozen veg- tier Food Terminal, Buffalo, N.Y. Appli­ father authority sought under section 7 etables, and bananas, from points m cant’s attorney: Israel Rumizen, 910-912 of the Transportation Act of 1958 to con­ Florida, North Carolina, Maryland, Walbridge Building, Buffalo 2, N.Y. tinue to operate as a common carrier, by Georgia, Delaware, New York, and Vir­ Grandfather authority sought under sec­ motor vehicle, over irregular routes, ginia, to points in , Connecticut, tion 7 of the Transportation Act of 1958 transporting: Bananas, from Weehaw- Delaware, the District of Columbia, to continue to operate as a common car­ ken, N.J., New York, N.Y., and Baltimore, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Ken­ rier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Md., to Boston, Brockton, Fitchburg, and tucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Mas­ routes, transporting: Frozen fruits, ber­ Worcester, Mass., Lewiston, Bangor, sachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, we ries, and vegetables; and cocoa beans Portland, and Bath, Maine, Providence, York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsyl­ and coffee beans, between points in New R.I., and Manchester, N.H. vania, Rhode Island, South paronna, Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. No. MC 115538 (Sub No. 3), filed No­ Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West No. MC 60785 (Sub No. 8), filed De­ vember 25, 1958. Applicant: ROSE ginia, and Wisconsin. , „ .qco cember 9, 1958. Applicant: ROGERS HEARSH AND IRWIN L. HEARSH, No. MC 117951, filed December 3, h«- MOTOR LINES, INC., Gilligan Street doing business as HEARSH BROS., 1103 Applicant: PAUL PINKERTON, and South Avenue, Scranton, Pa. San Julian Street, Los Angeles 15, Calif. No. 4, Box 321, Little Rock, Ark. Gran Grandfather authority sought under Applicant’s attorney: Donald Murchison, father authority sought under sec section 7 of the Transportation Act of 211 South Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, of the Transportation Act of 1958^ rrier 1958 to continue to operate as a common Calif. Grandfather authority sought tinue to operate as a common C ' carrier, by motor vehicle, over regular under section 7 of the Transportation by motor vehicle, over irregular rou routes, transporting: Frozen fruits, Act of 1958 to continue to operate as a transporting: Bananas, from we frozen berries, frozen ^vegetables, and common carrier, by motor vehicle, over leans, La., to Little Rock, Ark. 58 bananas, (1) between New York, N.Y., irregular routes, transporting: Bananas, No. MC 117996, filed December 4, and Jersey City, N.J., and Watertown, from Los Angeles and Los Angeles Har­ Applicant: F. JAMES F.OGAN, and Camp Drum, N.Y.; (a) from New bor, including Vernon, Calif., to Phoenix business as F. J. LOGAN, Shubenaca^ York over city streets to the Hudson and Tucson, Ariz. Hants County, Nova Scotia, ^ wi]. River, thence across the Hudson River No. MC 116144 (Sub No. 4), filed De­ Applicant’s attorney: Kennern • to the junction of New Jersey Highway cember 10,1958. Aplicant: ARTHUR W. liams, 111 State Street, Boston 3, thence over New Jersey Highway 3 to SORENSEN, doing business as SOREN­ Grandfather authority sought 1958 the junction of New Jersey Highway 17, SEN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, tion 7 of the Transportation aci cflf. thence over New Jersey Highway 17 to Johnson Road, Woodbridge, Conn. Ap­ to continue to operate as a com the junction of New York Highway 17, plicant’s attorney: Thomas W. Murrett, rier, by motor vehicle, ove from thence over New York Highway 17 to 410 Asylum Street, Hartford 3, Conn. routes, transporting: B anan"^ tM Binghamton, N.Y., thence over U.S. Grandfather authority sought under sec­ Boston, Mass., to ports oi ^twe^ Highway 11 via Syracuse to Watertown, tion 7 of the Transportation Act of 1958 International Boundary ^ gar N.Y. (alternate, U.S. Highway 11 to to continue to operate as a common the United States and 9 ^ a ADPiicaii{ Cortland, thence New York 281 to inter­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Harbor and Calais, Marne. Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4319 indicates fresh fruits, fresh berries, and Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, [Notice 128] fresh vegetables were transported in Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Mis­ mixed shipments with bananas, and souri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER seeks authority to continue the oper­ Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North PROCEEDINGS ation. Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Okla­ May 25, 1959. No. MC 118058, filed December 8, 1958. homa, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Synopses of orders entered pursuant to Applicant: JOHN W. GATES, 468 South­ Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, section 212(b) of the Interstate Com­ east Railroad Avenue, Ponchatoula, La. Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West merce Act, and rules and regulations pre­ Applicant’s representative: Rene A. Virginia, and Wisconsin. Applicant in­ scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), Stiegler, 1319 Broadway, New Orleans cludes property shown as exempt in the appear below: 18, La. Grandfather authority sought Commodity list incorporated in ruling As provided in the Commission’s gen­ under section 7 of the Transportation 107, March 19, 1958, Bureau of Motor eral rules of practice any interested per­ Act of 1958 to continue to operate as a Carriers, when transported in the same son may file a petition seeking recon­ common carrier, by motor vehicle, over, vehicle at the same time with the above- sideration of the following numbered irregular routes, transporting.: Bananas, specified commodities, and also seeks au­ proceedings within 30 days from the from New Orleans, La., Mobile, Ala., and thority to continue this operation. date of service of the order. Pursuant Galveston, Tex., to points in Arkansas, No. MC 118219, filed December 5, 1958. to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com­ Illinois, Indiana, , Kansas, Mich­ Applicant: WALTER STRAUS AND merce Act, the filing of such a petition igan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, SONra corporation, 3007 Race Street, will postpone the effective date of the Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Fort Worth, Tex. Grandfather author­ order in that proceeding pending its dis­ Wisconsin. ity sought under section 7 of the Trans­ position. The matters relied upon by No. MC 118105, filed December 9,1958, portation Act of 1958 to continue to op­ petitioners must be specified in their Applicant: GRANT TRUCK LINE, INC., erate as a common carrier, by motor petitions with particularity. 910 Cordell Street, P.O. Box 8714, Hous­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ No. MC-FC 61448. By order of May 6, ton, Tex. Applicant’s attorney: George ing : Frozen fruits, frozen berries, and 1959, f)ivision 4, approved the transfer M. Flint, Jr., 504 Shepherd, Houston 7, frozen vegetables, (1) between points in to William H. Brennecke and Theodore Tex. Grandfather authority sought California, Missouri, Wisconsin, Minne­ W. Brennecke, doing business as Bren­ under section 7 of the Transportation sota, Iowa, and Illinois, and (2) between necke Trucking' Company, 1500 Man Act of 1958 to continue to operate as a points in Texas and Kansas. O’ War, St. Louis, Mo., of a portion of common carrier, by motor vehicle, over No. MC 118278, filed December 10,1958. irregular routes, transporting: Frozen Applicant: J. W. ASHER, INC., P.O. Box Certificates Nos. MC 79269 Sub 1 and MC fruits, frozen berries, frozen vegetables, 71, Aurora, Mo. Grandfather authority 79269 Sub 3, issued January 31, 1942, and bananas, from Tampa, Fla., Alex­ sought under section 7 of the Transpor­ and June 17, 1949, respectively, to Glenn andria, Colfax, and New Orleans, La., tation Act of 1958 to continue to operate Dressel and Ed Dressel, doing business Tulsa and Oklahoma City, Okla., Kan­ as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, as Dressel Truck Service, Trenton, 111., sas City, Kans., Chicago, 111., and over irregular routes, transporting: authorizing the transportation of: Gen­ Brownsville, Houston, and Galveston; Frozen fruits and frozen berries, from eral commodities, excluding household Tex., to Houston, Austin, and Dallas, points in Missouri, Arkansas, Michigan, goods and other specified commodities, Tex. between Freeburg, 111., and the St. Louis, and Ohio, to points in Nebraska, Iowa, Mo.-East St. Louis, 111., Commercial No. MC 118110, filed December 7, 1951 Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Missouri, Kansas, Zone, serving intermediate and off-route W. J. ISOM, SR. AND W. , Oklahoma, Texas, Wisconsin, and points within five miles of (Freeburg; coal «¿a™ & a partnership doing busine: Minnesota. from points in St. Clair County, 111., to ANT0NI0 BANANA COMP AN! No. MC 118301, filed December 10,1958. the St. Louis, Mo.-East St. Louis, 111., Sauth Zarzamora Street, San Ar Applicant: R. E. BRAY, 1105 Main, Delta, Commercial Zone; and sand, from the St. jomo,Tex. Applicant’s attorney: Robe: Colo. Grandfather authority sought un­ Louis, Mo.-East St. Louis, 111., Commer­ R,,SriCkland’ 715 Frost National Ban der section 7 of the Transportation Act cial Zone, to points in St. Clair County, S w ng’ +uan Antonio 5, Tex. Granc of 1958 to continue to operate as a com­ 111., except those in Lebanon Township. £ r^ th0nty sought under section mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over ir­ j tmim +rransp°rtation Act of *958 to cor regular routes, transporting: Frozen [seal] Harold D. McCoy, ■ mntrvr ° ° ^ ra^e as a common carrier, b fruits, frozen berries, frozen vegetables, Secretary. trancr^J^1Cle’ over irregular route and bananas, between Delta, and Grand [F.R. Doc. 59-4472; Filed, May 27, 1959; tea C°coa beans, coffee bean Junction, Colo., Lakeland, Fla., Edenburg, 8:47 a.m.] any f o r S l ’ hei?p’ wo°l imported froi San Antonio, Laredo, and Brownsville, I wool country, wool tops and noil Tex., Los Angeles, and San Francisco, StedT nL (f rded’ spun’ woven, c Calif., and Salt Lake City, Utah. Ve9otablpf n(L / r° f e™ fruits> berries, an No. MC 118746, filed November 10, FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS loads with J?; s.traight and in mixe 1958. Applicant: NOEL E. TIDWELL, l between1^ ^ “ ^ exemPt commoditie doing busines as CULLMAN BANANA FOR RELIEF Colorado 111 ^abama, Arkansa SUPPLY, 104 First Avenue, East, May 25, 1959. Cullman, Ala. Grandfather authority tana NeW MeXlC0' ° kla Protests to the granting of an appli­ sought under section 7 of the Transpor­ cation must be prepared in accordance i »iiranfUoWBUTed Decembe1, 7,1951 tation Act of 1958 to continue to operate with Rule 40 of the general rules of Southey°‘ H* LANIER, INC., 15C as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within Texh A n S ° t.a Street’ San Antoni« over 'irregular routes, transporting: 15 days from the date of publication of S^icklandstrickland>llC'fi^t ,, , Srn5tt?mey: ™ attomey: RobertRob ] Frozen berries and bananas from Mobile this notice in the F ederal R egister. Suilding g J 15. J***- National and Cullman, Ala., New Orleans, La., and ifather aüthoHt t0m° 5’ Tex- Grai Tampa, Fla., to points in Tennessee, Long- and-S hort H aul kof t fh a e e w S SÄ !?ugbt !?ught under sectisectioi Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana Ohio, Mis­ FSA No. 35450: Substituted service— tinue ¿ T ~ n Act of 1958 to c, souri, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois Central for motor carriers. Filed motor vph««i e as a common carrier, California, Mississippi, Arkansas, Texas, by Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau, tra^Portw *rregular roui Virginia, West Virginia, South Carolina, Agent (No. 164), for interested rail and 'Hes> trozen^aet02* ? 1 fruits> frozen b North Carolina, Georgia, Florida, New motor carriers. Rates on property ,ee^ans ten9h n bl6S> C0C0a heans> c Mexico, and Alabama. loaded in trailers and transported on ?°rted from a n v ? " “8, hemP, wool i By the Commission. railroad flat oars between Chicago, 111., toP* and mih L * °reie? country, w on the one hand, and Council Bluffs, Ft. ^wove“orl« H ^ Waste (card [seal] H arold D. M cCoy, Dodge, or Waterloo, Iowa, on the other, j? Arizona ’Ark ^ttedl; between po* Secretary. on traffic originating at or destined to Mo, California, C [F.R. Doc. 59-4420; Filed, May 27, 1959; points in territories described in the orgla* Idaho, Illinois, 8:45 a.m.] application. 4320 NOTICES Grounds for relief: Motor truck com­ of learners, learning periods, and the Laurens Shirt Corp., Hillcrest Drive, Lau­ principal product manufactured by the rens, S.C.; effective 5-12-59 to 11-11-59; 20 petition. learners (men’s dress and sport shirts). Tariff: Supplement 99 to Middlewest employer for certificates issued under Pikeville Sportswear Co., Pikeville, Tenn.; Motor Freight Bureau tariff MF-I.C.C. general learner regulations (§§ 522.1 to effective 6-27-59 to 11-26-59; 10 learners 223. 522.11) are as indicated below. Condi­ (men’s and boys’ sport shirts). FSA No. 35451: Substituted service— tions provided in certificates issued under Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Co., C.G.W. Ry for Bos Lines, Inc. Filed by special industry regulations are as estab­ Weslaco, Texas; effective 5-15-59 to 11-14-59; Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau, lished in these regulations. 100 learners (men’s and boys’ cotton casual Apparel Industry Learner Regulations pants). Agent (No. 165), for interested rail and Wilson County Garment Co., Watertown, motor carriers. Rates on property (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.11, as amended, and Tenn.; effective 5-15-59 to 11-14-59; 30 learn­ loaded in trailers and transported on 29 CFR 522.20 to 522.24, as amended). ers (men’s and boys’ sport shirts). railroad flat cars between Chicago, 111., The following learner certificates were and Des Moines, Iowa, or Kansas City or issued authorizing the employment of ten Glove Industry Learner Regulations St. Joseph, Mo., and between Kansas percent of the total number of factory (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.11, as amended, and City, Mo., and Des Moines, Iowa, or St. production workers for normal labor 29 CFR 522.60 to 522.65, as amended). Paul, Minn., on motor traffic from or to turnover purposes. The effective and Fairfield Glove Co., Bonaparte, Iowa; effec­ points beyond the named points. expiration dates are .indicated. tive 5-16-59 to 5-15-60; 10 learners for nor­ Grounds for relief: Motor truck com­ mal labor turnover purposes (work gloves). Carolina Industrial Manufacturing Co., 364 Fairfield Glove Co., 603 West Stone Street, petition. Ashe Street, Greensboro, N.C.; effective 5-12- Fairfield, Iowa; effective 5-16-59 to 5-15-60; Tariff: Supplement 99 to Middlewest 59 to 5-11-60 (children’s wear). 10 learners for normal labor turnover pur­ Motor Freight Bureau tariff MF-I.C.C. Kutztown Sportswear, Inc., 361 East Main poses (work gloves). 223. Street, Kutztown, Pa.; effective 5-27-59 to Wells Lamont Corp., Eupora, Miss.; effec­ FSA No. 35452: Scrap iron or steel— 5-26-60 (ladies’ blouses). tive 5-14-59 to 5-13-60; 10 percent of the The H. D. Lee Co., Inc., 405 East Madison, total number of machipe stitchers for nor­ Chicago, III., to Houston, Tex. Filed by South Bend, Ind.; effective 5-15-59 to 5-14-60 Southwestern Freight Bureau, Agent mal labor turnover purposes (Jersey work (men’s work clothing). gloves). (No. B-7552), for interested rail car­ Rappahannock Manufacturing Co., Inc., Western Glove Co., Inc., Orting, Wash.; riers. Rates on scrap iron or steel, car­ 401 Lafayette Boulevard, Fredericksburg, Va.; effective 5-13-59 to 5-12-60; six learners for loads, as more fully described in the ap­ effective 5-15-59 to 5-14-60; workers en­ normal labor turnover purposes (canton plication from Chicago, 111., to Houston, gaged in the production of men’s odd trousers flannel work gloves). Tex. (men’s dress trousers). Grounds for relief: Competition of Regina Manufacturing Co., Inc., 44 Carey Hosiery Industry Learner Regulations water carriers by barge. Avenue, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.; effective 5-18-59 (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.11, as amended, and to 5-17-60 (women’s apparel). 29 CFR 522.40 to 522.44, as amended). Tariff: Supplement 46 to Southwest­ Scranton Pants Manufacturing Co., 614 ern Freight Bureau tariff I.C.C. 4295. Wyoming Avenue, Scranton, Pa.; .effective C. W. Anderson Hosiery Co., East Carolina FSA No. 35453: Plaster and related 5-23-59 to 5-22-60 (men’s pants). Avenue, Clinton, S.C.; effective 5-22-59 to articles from Heath, Mont. Filed by Williamson-Dickie Manufacturing Co., Mc­ 5-21-60; five learners for normal labor turn- Trans-Continental Freight Bureau, Allen, Texas; effective 6-17-59 to 6-16-60 over purposes (full-fashioned and seamless). Agent (No. 359), for interested rail car­ (men’s and boys’ cotton pants). Charmeuse Hosiery Industries, Inc., As*1®" Wilson County Garment Co., Watertown, boro, N.C.; effective 5-18-59 to 11-17-59; a riers. Rates on plaster and related Tenn.; effective 5-15-59 to 5-14-60 (men’s learners for plant expansion purposes (seam- articles, carloads, as more fully described and boys’ sport shirts). less). . . in the application from Heath, Mont., to Fairview Hosiery Mills, Inc., 1643 T““ specified points in Colorado and Wyo­ Thé following learner certificates were Avenue, Drive NW.; Hickory, N.C.; effective ming. issued for normal labor turnover pur­ 5-15-59 to 5-14-60; five learners for normal labor turnover purposes (seamless). Grounds for relief: Modified short­ poses. The effective and expiration Peerless Hosiery Co., North Wilkesboro, line distance formula and market dates and the number of learners au­ N.C.; effective 5-16-59 to ¿1-15-59; 30 learn­ competition. thorized are indicated. ers for plant expansion purposes (seam e J. Tariff: Supplement 35. to Trans-Con­ Blue Bell, Inc., Homer, Ga.; effective 5-31- . Peerless Hosiery Co., West Jefferson, • tinental Freight Bureau tariff I.C.C. 59 to 5-30-60; 10 learners (men’s and boys' effective 5-16-59 to 11-15-59; 15 learners fo 1604. sport jackets). . plant explansion purposes (seamless). Copeland Dress Co., Inc., 5 Montauk Ave­ By the Commission. nue, New London, Conn.; effective 5-14-59 to Regulations Applicable to the Employ­ ment of Learners (29 CFR 522.Lto 522, v [seal] Harold D. M cCoy, 5-13-60; five learners (women’s, misses’ and Secretary. juniors’ dresses), as amended). , Hamlet Products Co., Rockingham, N.C.; Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., Bruceton. T «^ [F.R. Doc. 59-4473; Filed, May 27, 1959; effective 5-25-59 to 9-16-59; 10 learners (re­ effective 5-18-59 to 11-17-59; five P j g j j j 8:47 am.] placement certificate) (ladies’ lingerie). the total number of factory product ^ Keyser Garment Co., Keyser, W. Va.; ef­ ers for normal labor turnover PuJ^xrating fective 5-12-59 to 5-11-60; 10 learners (Wom­ the occupation of sewing machine pe en’s dresses). for a learning period of 480 hours DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Marysville Dress Co., 304 Cameron Street, rates of not less than 90 cents a ^ cgnts Marysville, Pa.; effective 5-15-59 to 5-14-60; the first 280 hours and not less Wage and Hour Division five learners (children’s dresses). an hour for the remaining 200 hours ( P Monroe Garment Co., Southerland Avenue, ment certificate) (men’s and y LEARNER EMPLOYMENT Monroe, N.C.; effective 5-14-59 to 5-13-60; coats and jackets). CERTIFICATES five learners (men’s cotton work shirts). Styl-Mac Corp., Southerland Avenue, Mon­ The following l^ m e r certifiSmpS Issuance to Various Industries roe, N.C.; effective 5-12-59 to 6-11-60; 10 issued in Puerto Rico to the c ^ learners (boys’ cotton pants). hereinafter named. The effec Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Tru-fit Trousers, Traverse City, Mich.; section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards expiration dates, learner rate ' nUmber effective 5-18-59 to 5-17-60; 10 learners tions, learning periods, and tn t0 Act of 1938 (52 Stat.-1060, as amended, (single pants). 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), the regulations on or proportion of learners aut employment of learners (29 CFR Part The following learner certificates were be employed, are as indicated. 522), Administrative Order No. 485 (23 issued for plant expansion purposes. Carolina Rubber Manufacturing^^. F.R. 200) and Administrative Order No. The effectivfe and expiration dates and Carolina, P.R.; effective 4-1-*» ^ eposes 507 (23 F.R. 2720), the firms listed in the number of learners authorized are eight learners for plant expa_en, for * indicated. in the occupations of: (1) P the rates of this notice have been issued special cer­ learning period of 480 hours ^ours and tificates authorizing the employment of Blue Bell, Inc., Coalgate, Okla., effective 75 cents an hour for the firs, , e 240 hour®; learners at hourly wage rates lower than 5-14-59 to 11-13-59; 20 learners (men’s and 88 cents an hour for the remaj- period of the minimum wage rates otherwise ap­ boys’ work pants). (2) compounders, for a t anhour*01 plicable under section 6 of the Act. The Glen Lyon Bra Co., Enterprise and Market 320 hours at the rates of 75 cen bour for effective and expiration dates, occupa­ Streets, Glen Lyon, Pa.; effective 5-18-59 to the first 160 hours and 88 H ^tors, i°r tions, wage rates, number of proportion 11-17-59; 20 learners (ladies’ brassieres). the remaining 160 hours; (3) Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4321 a learning period of 160 hours at the rate of Notice is hereby given that pursuant to try In the occupations of bookbinder, sewer, 75 cents an hour (technical rubber parts). section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards stamper, trimmer, cutter, backer, boarder, Each learner certificate has been is­ Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1060, as amended, case-maker and related skilled and semi­ 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.), and Part 527 of skilled occupations, each for a learning sued upon the representations of the em­ period of 600 hours at the rates of 85 cents ployer which, among other things, were the regulations issued thereunder (29 an hour for the first 300 hours and 90 cents that employment of learners at submini­ CFR Part 527) a special certificate au­ and hour for the remaining 300 hours. mum rates is necessary in order to pre­ thorizing the employment of student- vent curtailment of opportunities for workers at hourly wage rates lower The student-worker certificate was employment, and that experienced work­ than the minimum wage rates applicable issued upon the applicant’s representa­ ers for the learner occupations are not under section 6 of the Act has been issued tions and supporting material fulfilling available. The certificate?'may be an­ to the firm listed below. Effective and the statutory requirements for the issu­ nulled ; or withdrawn, as indicated expiration dates, occupations, and learn­ ance of such certificate, as interpreted therein, in the manner provided in Part ing periods for the certificate issued and applied by Part 527. 528 of Title 29 of the Code of Federal under Part 527 is as indicated below. Signed at Washington, D.C., this 19th Regulations. Any person aggrieved by Regulations Applicable to the Employ­ day of May 1959. the issuance of any of these certificates ment of Student-Workers (29 CFR 527.1 may seek a review or reconsideration to 527.9). M ilton B rooke, thereof within fifteen days after publica­ San Pasqual Academy, Route 1, Box 890, Authorized Representative tion of this notice in the F ederal R eg­ Escondido, Calif.; effective 5/15/59 to of the Administrator. ister, pursuant to the provisions of 29 8/31/59; authorizing the employment of 12 [P.R. Doc. 59-4474; Filed,' May 27, 1959; CPR 522.9. student-workers in the bookbindery indus- 8:47 a.m.J

CUMULATIVE CODIFICATION GUIDE— MAY A numerical list of the parts of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during May. Proposed rules, as opposed to final actions, are identified as such.

3 CFR Pas0 6 CFR Pase 7 CFR—Continued Page Proclamations: 10------3559,3811,4296 Proposed rules—Continued Feb 9,1914.. 4039 301------3969,4199 1675...... 53— ------4307 4191 331------3475 6 8 ------4031,4307 2165______4191 421______3813, 2311____ '301------4184 4191 3845, 4017, 4125, 4128, 4199, 4235 319------3 7 9 9 3279____ 3527 362 d.rt£Q 3290 _ 3527 3291 __ 813 avoo 3811 902------3630, 3958 3292 _ 4123 904 asa* 3293 _ 4191 3294 _ 913 . a7«d 4191 925------3608 3295 ____ 4199 7 CFR Executive orders: 927------3608,3958 934------3 5 3 5 4203_ 52------__ 3782,3984,3986 4053 937------4263 8673___ 4191 9646___. 942------3 6 9 7 4293 947------4 0 0 0 10168... 4123 301------3529, 3955,4296 10477.. . 319------4023, 4132 962------3889 4159 990 ------3611 10480.. . 3779 10495 401------3845,3847,3848 997------4169 4045 1 0 0 0 ------4032 10501. 3777 10574. 1 0 2 1 ------3 5 3 6 3779 1023------4 1 5 0 10575.. 4159 722 ------______3814,4234 10610.. 4159 728—. ____ 3747, 3986, 4023, 4132, 4207 8 CFR 10625.. . 4159 730 ------3747,4207 103__ ^ 0700 * 10663_ 4159 2 1 2 ____ Q7Qn 10669 213__ Q7on 10742.. . 4045 4159 214__ a7 Qf» 10813 ______922------3530, 3565, 3623, 3750, 3986, 4161 10814 3465 231______3790 10815 3474 245_ / ado-i 10816 3474 251___ a7 on 10817 3777 936------4099, 4162, 4163 252_ aaan 10818 3779 299 aaoi 10819. 3779 9 CFR I 10820.’" 3779 953------3530, 3751, 4045 3785, 3789, 3955, 3987, 4023, 4164 10821. ' 955 add 10822 ' 4123 4159 962 affili . 10823.1' 968. 203 ------4 2 1 0 residential 4293 Proposed rules: I Vr°clamat documents other'than I orders: lons a n d Executive 1 0 0 1 — ______3 5 7 3 .27------3 7 3 5 1021------_ ___ 4132,4134 5 ^ morandum, May 7,1959_ 1067------4134 10 CFR 1069------3 5 7 4 Proposed rules: ^ ----- 3559. 3692, 3719, 412: 28...... i ___ 4147 Proposed rules: 4 51------3731,3761- 1—140______4184 3763, 3887, 3993, 4148, 4149, 4306 20------3537 52------3887, 3993, 3996, 3998 140------3508 4322 FEDERAL REGISTER 12 CFR Page 21 CFR—Continued Page 32 CFR— Continued Pag« 215_____ 4139 Proposed rules—Continued 861______3726 220_____ 3866 120______3766, 3959 862______3505 221_____ 3867 121______— 3827 886______3729 563_____ 3753 1007______4237 22 CFR 1200—1299______3592 13 CFR 61...... 4305 121_____ 3491 63______3877 33 CFR 121______3721 19------4053 14 CFR 123 ______3722, 4166 85 ______3506 1—199______- ______3574 124 ______:______3722 8 6 ______3506,4104 4a______-______4304 125 ______.__ 3723 91__ 3506 42_...... 4304 126 ______3723 96______3507 43 _ 4304 202 ______3760,3956 45 ____ 4304 24 CFR 203 ______3629,3760 60______3956 292a______4139 204 ______3760 200—399______3574 25 CFR 207_____ 3629 233______3869 121______3692 241______3869,4100 163______4030 36 CFR 249______3531 221______3532, 3757, 3758, 4030 251______3581 400—635___ —______3574 Proposed rules: Proposed rules: 409______3498, 3972 171______3881, 3993, 4215 13______i______4169 507______3574, 3754, 4025, 4304 172______3881, 3993, 421520______4169,4305 600 ______3870, 3871, 3972 173 ______3881, 3993, 4215 601 ____a*______3872, 3874, 3973 37 CFR 174 _____ ,______3881, 3993 Proposed rules: 602.____ 3875 176__ I ______4215 608 ______3875, 3876 201______. 3545 184______3881 202______3546 609 ______3974, 4203 221...... 4215, 4305 610 ______-__ __ 3500, 4051 38 CFR 1200—1299______3574 26 (1939) CFR __ 3592 1201...... 3574 9______3819 3592 Proposed rules: 458______3503 __ 4055 60___ :______m.___ 3959 21 514______3699; 3700, 3882 26 (1954) CFR l ______3693, 3819, 4223 39 CFR 12 _ 4140 15 CFR 295______— ______4166 _ 4140 301______3503 21 368______-______3987 24__ _ 4140 370 ______3752 Proposed rules: 4140 1______—______4007 27__ 371 ______3987, 4305 41 4250 382______s.____ 4025 196______3695 __ 3533,3534 385______3987 253______r -______3881 45______4250 399______3752 270______4255 275______4255 i í i ------__ 3990 16 CFR 123— ------3990 27 CFR 152__— ------3990 13______- __ 3531, Proposed rules: 3579, 3580, 3625, 3877, 4027-4029, . 3592,4251 4051, 4102, 4103, 4210-4212, 4235 5______3958 46 _ 4135 29 CFR 20J ------35,2 522______4052 17 CFR 526______3581 Proposed rules: 4264 Proposed rules: .. 3791 1 ______4307 601______602______3792 41 CFR 230______3514, 3766 __ 3503 231—239______3766 603______Proposed rules: 3513 Proposed rules: 202______18 CFR 545—______- 4105 42 CFR 3956 Proposed rules: 30 CFR 51______101------3905 Proposed rules: 3795 19 CFR . 14a______43 CFR 3 ______3756 31 CFR 71 5______3532 309______3533 192 10 ______3956 359______3533 200 16______3817 414 18______3532 32 CFR Proposed rules: Proposed rules 1 3582 11 ______3513 2 3586 200—II ------31____ 3535 4 3586 254______6 3586 258______—------21 CFR 7 3587 Public land orders: 3 3756 8 3589 9______1__ 3818, 3851 9_ . ______3589 667—1____ 19_ 3865 13______3589 1571______27______3757, 381916 ______;______3589 1673______120______4165 30____ 3591 1725______146a______3757, 4165204____ 3851 ______146c______3757 207______3851 1812______Proposed rules: 511______4166 * 1838______- 9 4264 536______4053 1839 ______— 15______- 4308 562______3759 1840 ______19___ 3735, 3826 836______3504 1841 ___— ------51______4059 845______3724 1842 Thursday, May 28, 1959 FEDERAL REGISTER 4323 Page 43 CFR—Continued 4 6 CFR 47 CFR— Continued Page Public land orders—Continued 10...... 4213 Proposed rules—Continued 1843 ______3729 12 4213 9 3611,4150 1844 ______3760 147______3507 1 2 _ _ _ 1845 ______3879 154______4057 1846 ______3879 187______4213 4 9 CFR 1847—______3992 246- ______3793 o ______1848______4053 284__...... 4168 54______1849.______4054 370______3625 72______1850 ______! 4054 Proposed rules: 73______1851 ______4054 1______4169 74______1852 ______4055 4______4169 78______1853 ______4055 35______4057 97______1854 ______4055 78______4057 143______1855 ______4056 97______4057 170______1856 ______4056 ( 136—______4169 184______1857 ______4056 137______4169 Proposed rules: 1858 ...... 4168 146 ______4057 72______1859 ...... 4252 162—______4057 73...... 187______4169 74______44 CFR 298______4032 77______Proposed ru les: 4 7 CFR 78______401__ %______f ______195______3800 5 ______3 7 9 3 4060, 4142 45 CFR 12______3794 5 0 CFR 31______*______3880 33—______106____ 3880 Proposed rules: 114____ _ 46______3626, 3751 3694 3...... 4264 2 0 2 ......

\