Mobility in Phnom Penh Towards Inclusive and Equitable Urban Accessibility Research Team

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mobility in Phnom Penh Towards Inclusive and Equitable Urban Accessibility Research Team Transforming Urban Mobility in Phnom Penh Towards Inclusive and Equitable Urban Accessibility Research Team Ph.D. Cand. M. Sc. BAETZNER Arnd (Lead) Dr. PHUN Veng Kheang Dr. YEN Yat and NGO Natharoun Copyright © 2021 By the United Nations Development Programme 53 Pasteur Street, Boeung Keng Kang 1, Phnom Penh, Cambodia All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of UNDP Cambodia or partners. For contributions and feedback, please email us at [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team would like to express their great appreciation to the stakeholders of urban mobility in Phnom Penh that kindly made themselves available as interview partners and made a tremendous contribution by providing the first-hand insights that essential parts of this report are based on. We wish to sincerely thank UNDP Country Director Mr Nick Beresford and UNDP Head of Policy Unit Ms Nimnuon Ivek for entrusting the research team to conduct this first hand research work on a topic crucial to further urban development. We also wish to specially acknowledge the highly valuable guidance and insights provided by the UNDP Cambodia team and The Center for Khmer Studies (CKS), particularly Mr. Wisal Hin, Mr. Natharoun Ngo, Ms. Lang Sok, Ms. Nimnuon Ivek, Mrs. Johanna Paola Gaba Legarta, Mr. Bora Phat. The research team’s special thanks go to CKS director Mr. Natharoun Ngo, who actively contributed to writing several sections of this report with a particular focus on social and economic aspects of urban development and mobility. His recommendations and inputs all along the research team’s research path provided an invaluable support. We also wish to thank Dr. Aurel Von Richthofen from Singapore-ETH Centre SEC, and Dr Thuon Try from CKS, for contributing with their time and feedback to the quality of this report. Our thanks also include the efficient assistance that the research team has received from Ms. Samedy Suong and Ms. Ngichlim Sea from CKS. Phnom Penh, Cambodia Ph.D. cand. M. Sc. Mr. Arnd N. Bätzner Dr. Veng Kheang Phun Dr. Yat Yen Transforming Urban Mobility In Phnom Penh Towards Inclusive and Equitable Urban Accessibility 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2. OBJECTIVES OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1. Declared Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2. Methodology .................................................................................................................................................... 6 3. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1. Summary and Synopsis of Results ............................................................................................................ 8 3.2. Summary of Recommendations .................................................................................................................10 3.3. Representation as Infographic ....................................................................................................................11 4. URBAN STRUCTURES ..............................................................................................................................14 4.1. Urban Growth and Land Use .....................................................................................................................14 4.2. Public Green Spaces .....................................................................................................................................15 5. TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURES .........................................................................................................17 5.1. Urban Road Networks .................................................................................................................................. 17 5.2. Ring Roads .......................................................................................................................................................19 5.3. Infrastructure for New Urban Public Transport Modes .......................................................................20 5.4. Bridges and Ferries ......................................................................................................................................20 5.5. Sidewalks .........................................................................................................................................................21 5.6. Parking .............................................................................................................................................................23 5.7. Infrastructure Performance .......................................................................................................................25 5.7.1. System Stability and Disruptions .........................................................................................................26 5.7.2. Options for Improvement Measures ..................................................................................................27 6. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................................28 6.1. Fixed-Route Transportation ........................................................................................................................28 6.1.1. Public Bus ...................................................................................................................................................29 6.1.2. Airport Train .................................................................................................................................................31 6.1.3. Water Taxi ...................................................................................................................................................33 6.2. PARATRANSIT: ON-DEMAND SERVICES ................................................................................................34 6.2.1. Motodop ......................................................................................................................................................34 6.2.2. Auto Rickshaws .........................................................................................................................................35 6.2.3. Metered/Ride-Hailing Taxis ...................................................................................................................36 6.2.4. Cyclo .............................................................................................................................................................37 6.2.5. Regulatory Issues .....................................................................................................................................37 6.2.6. Significance ................................................................................................................................................37 Transforming Urban Mobility In Phnom Penh 2 Towards Inclusive and Equitable Urban Accessibility 7. LOGISTICS AND COMMERCIAL CARGO TRANSPORT ......................................................................39 7.1. Urban Cargo Vehicles ..................................................................................................................................39 7.2. Street Vendors and Hawkers ......................................................................................................................41 7.2.1. Street Vendors ...........................................................................................................................................41 7.2.2. Hawkers........................................................................................................................................................41 7.3. Waste Management ....................................................................................................................................42 7.4. Heavy Freight Haulage ...............................................................................................................................43 8. SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT......................................................................................................45 8.1. Population .......................................................................................................................................................45 8.2. Employment ................................................................................................................................................... 47 8.3. Household Income and Expenditure .......................................................................................................48 8.4. Vehicle Ownership ......................................................................................................................................48 8.5. Environmental Conditions
Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh
    Final Report on Sustainable Urban Transport Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh Prepared By: NOOR-E-ALAM Superintending Engineer Roads and Highways Department Dhaka, Bangladesh October 2018 Sustainable Urban Transportation Index (SUTI) for Dhaka, Bangladesh Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Study area .................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Objectives of the study ................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 2: CURRENT STATE OF URBAN TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ............................ 4 2.1 Major transport network and systems ......................................................................... 4 2.2 Key connection points of DMA .................................................................................. 5 2.3 Existing transport situation of Dhaka city ................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Major transport modes of Dhaka city .................................................................. 7 2.3.2 Modal share in Dhaka city ................................................................................... 8 2.3.3 Environmental perspective ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study
    PortPort ofof SanSan FranciscoFrancisco WaterWater TaxiTaxi FeasibilityFeasibility StudyStudy Presentation to San Francisco Port Commission Water Taxi December 8, 2009 Veronica Sanchez Consulting Walther Engineering Services ScopeScope ofof StudyStudy ¾ IsIs therethere ridershipridership demanddemand forfor waterwater taxitaxi service?service? ¾ WhatWhat cancan wewe learnlearn fromfrom otherother otherother citycity’’ss waterwater taxitaxi systems?systems? ¾ WhatWhat areare capitalcapital andand operatingoperating requirementsrequirements forfor PSFPSF toto startstart thisthis service?service? Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand? ¾ #1 Market Niche: F-Line Diversions ¾ F-Line has overcapacity problems. Wait times are longer than travel time at peak. • Conservative Assumption: 522-576 daily riders • Aggressive assumption 1306-1440 daily riders Compare: Harbor Bay: 620 daily riders. Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand? ¾ #2 Market Niche: Repeat visitors (17.5%) may be looking for a different shoreline experience ¾ #3 Visitor Attractions & Destinations z Example: Exploratorium Opening in 2014. z Special events Port of San Francisco Water Taxi Feasibility Study Veronica Sanchez Consulting September 2009 Walther Engineering Services IsIs therethere RidershipRidership Demand?Demand?
    [Show full text]
  • Sthapatyakam. the Architecture of Cambodia
    STHAPATYAKAM The Architecture of Cambodia ស䮐ាបតាយកម䮘កម䮖ុᾶ The “Stha Patyakam” magazine team in front of Vann Molyvann’s French Library on the RUPP Campus Supervisor Dr. Tilman Baumgärtel Thanks to Yam Sokly, Heritage Mission, who has Design Supervisor Christine Schmutzler shared general knowledge about architecture in STHAPATYAKAM Editorial Assistant Jenny Nickisch Cambodia, Oun Phalline, Director of National Museum, The Architecture of Cambodia Writers and Editors An Danhsipo, Bo Sakalkitya, Sok Sophal, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Architecture, Chey Phearon, Chhuon Sophorn, Cheng Bunlong, for an exclusive interview, Chheang Sidath, architect at Dareth Rosaline, Heng Guechly, Heang Sreychea, Ly Chhuong Import & Export Company, Nhem Sonimol, ស䮐ាបតាយកម䮘កម䮖ុᾶ Kun Chenda, Kim Kotara, Koeut Chantrea, Kong Sovan, architect student, who contributed the architecture Leng Len, Lim Meng Y, Muong Vandy, Mer Chanpolydet, books, Chhit Vongseyvisoth, architect student, A Plus Sreng Phearun, Rithy Lomor Pich, Rann Samnang, who contributed the Independence Monument picture, Samreth Meta, Soy Dolla, Sour Piset, Song Kimsour, Stefanie Irmer, director of Khmer Architecture Tours, Sam Chanmaliny, Ung Mengyean, Ven Sakol, Denis Schrey from Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Phnom Department of Media and Communication Vorn Sokhan, Vann Chanvetey, Yar Ror Sartt, Penh for financial support of the printing, to the Royal University of Phnom Penh Yoeun Phary, Nou Uddom. Ministry of Tourism that has contributed the picture of Russian Boulevard, Phnom Penh Illustrator Lim
    [Show full text]
  • Water Transit Strategic Plan June 22, 2015
    i Baltimore Water Transit Strategic Plan June 22, 2015 Acknowledgments This report is prepared for the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) with assistance from Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP and funded through a grant provide by the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board, the Maryland Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation. City of Baltimore Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Mayor William M. Johnson, Director of Transportation Lindsay Wines, Deputy Director, Administration Veronica P. McBeth, Transit Bureau Chief Valorie LaCour, RLA, LEED AP, Division Chief, Transportation Planning Project Team BCDOT Linda Taylor-Newton, City Planner II Ciara M. Willis, Transit Services Administrator Frances Knauff - Dockmaster Whitman, Requardt and Associates, LLP Thomas J. Hannan, PE, Senior Vice President James M. Ritchey, Vice President Patrick R. Christian, Transit Technical Specialist Andrea Trabelsi, AICP, Transportation Planner Wendy Haubert, Geographic Information System Specialist Abbi Hoff, Graphics Artist Special thanks to eleven business and community leaders who participated in a Water Transit Workshop on February 24, 2015 including representatives from Greater Baltimore Committee, Waterfront Partnership, Under Armour, Legg Mason, Workshop Development, Watermark Cruises, Baltimore Development Corporation, Locust Point Civic Association, Baltimore Zipcar, and Cruise Maryland. Harbor Care, LLC the operator of the Water Taxi and Harbor Connector cooperated fully over the course of the study providing
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry & Water Taxi Handout 1
    Port of San Francisco To Vallejo FERRY SYSTEM Since 1875 ferries have been a primary means of transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area. The historic Ferry Building at the foot of Market Street, was established as the main terminus for people Ferry Service Routes boarding and disembarking ferries to various locations in the Bay and Delta areas. Today, it continues to serve San Francisco’s financial, commercial, and tourism centers, providing transportation to over Larkspur Port of San Francisco 16,000 passengers daily. Ferry terminals at China Basin and Pier 41 primarily serve visitor attractions Landing June 13, 2016 at AT&T Ballpark and Fisherman’s Wharf with access to the lightrail system along The Embarcadero. Ferry Services & Routes San Francisco Bay Ferry Blue & Gold Fleet Golden Gate Ferry Tiburon www.sanfranciscobayferry.com www.blueandgoldfleet.com www.goldengateferry.org San Francisco Sausalito Bay Alameda Main St. AT&T Park Pier 41 Sausalito San Francisco Sausalito Ferry Building Ferry Building Larkspur Pier 41 Sausalito Pier 41 South Pier 41 Jack London Square, San Francisco Tiburon Ferry Building Oakland AT&T Park Alameda San Francisco Tiburon Downtown Terminal Oakland Ferry Building Pier 41 Vallejo Ferry Building Harbor Bay Ferry Building Alameda AT&T Park Oakland AT&T Park Terminals Ferry Building Pier 41 South San Francisco Downtown Ferry Terminal and Golden Gate Ferry Terminal Downtown Terminal San Francisco Harbor Bay Ferry Building Alameda are located behind the Ferry Oakland San Francisco Vallejo Building at the
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Harbor Connector Ferry
    Inner Harbor Connector Ferry Business Plan for New Water Transportation Service 1 2 Inner Harbor Connector Contents The Inner Harbor Connector 3 Overview 4 Why Ferries 5 Ferries Today 7 Existing Conditions 7 Best Practices 10 Comprehensive Study Process 13 Collecting Ideas 13 Forecasting Ridership 14 Narrowing the Dock List 15 Selecting Routes 16 Dock Locations and Conditions 19 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 21 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 23 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 25 Fan Pier (Seaport) 27 Dock Improvement Recommendations 31 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 33 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 34 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 35 Fan Pier (Seaport) 36 Route Configuration and Schedule 39 Vessel Recommendations 41 Vessel Design and Power 41 Cost Estimates 42 Zero Emissions Alternative 43 Ridership and Fares 45 Multi-modal Sensitivity 47 Finances 51 Overview 51 Pro Forma 52 Assumptions 53 Funding Opportunities 55 Emissions Impact 59 Implementation 63 Appendix 65 1 Proposed route of the Inner Harbor Connector ferry 2 Inner Harbor Connector The Inner Harbor Connector Authority (MBTA) ferry service between Charlestown and Long Wharf, it should be noted that the plans do not specify There is an opportunity to expand the existing or require that the new service be operated by a state entity. ferry service between Charlestown and downtown Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Boston to also serve East Boston and the South and the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) were Boston Seaport and connect multiple vibrant both among the funders of this study and hope to work in neighborhoods around Boston Harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Juicing the “Seattle Squeeze” Lessons Learned from Seattle’S SR-99 Closure
    Juicing the “Seattle Squeeze” Lessons Learned from Seattle’s SR-99 Closure APTA Sustainability & Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop BenjaminDepartment Smith of Transportation July 29, 2019 Presentation overview • Seattle transit overview • The “Seattle Squeeze” • SR-99 Closure • Preparation for closure • Coordination during closure • Lessons learned Department of Transportation Seattle transit overview • King County Metro • Local and commuter bus • RapidRide BRT and electric trolleybus • Water taxi • Sound Transit • Link light rail • ST Express regional bus • Sounder commuter rail • City of Seattle • Seattle Center Monorail • Seattle Streetcar Department of Transportation The “Seattle Squeeze” • One of fastest growing cities in U.S. • ~250K employment in greater downtown (HQ1) • Transit ridership investment and growth • Infrastructure and development projects Department of Transportation The “Seattle Squeeze” - Timeline • • • • D2 Roadway • SR-99 Tunnel •• CenterAlaskan City Way open Convention Center Madison East Link, closes open Connectorto buses open RapidRide Lynnwood and • • Convention • Alaskan Way • mayConnect open 2020 Northgate Link G Line Federal Way (on hold) Center Viaduct (currentlyconstruction on hold) open open Link open • • construction demolition • Alaskan Way open North Portal Alaskan Way open begins • Alaskan Way to buses* streets open to traffic • construction Seattle Arena begins renovation • DSTT buses shift complete to surface • SR-520 “Rest of the West” project begins SR-99 Closure activities Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transit Needs Assessment
    Appendix A: Public Survey What Did People Tell Us They Want? As part of the Transit Needs Assessment, BMC conducted a 12-question survey to collect public opinion on issues facing Baltimore regional transit. The survey was conducted from September 21, 2015 through October 13, 2015 and resulted in 467 responses. Appendix A - Public Survey Survey Responses Transit Needs Assessment Survey Q1 What jurisdiction do you live in? Answered: 467 Skipped: 1 Anne Arundel Baltimore City Baltimore County Carroll County Harford County Howard County Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses Anne Arundel 15.20% 71 Baltimore City 48.61% 227 Baltimore County 31.69% 148 Carroll County 1.28% 6 Harford County 1.28% 6 Howard County 0.86% 4 Other (please specify) 1.07% 5 Total 467 1 / 12 A-2 Appendix A - Public Survey Transit Needs Assessment Survey Q2 How often do you ride transit (MARC, metro, light rail, bus, Circulator, water taxi) Answered: 462 Skipped: 6 More than once a week More than once a month A couple times a year Very rarely Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Answer Choices Responses More than once a week 19.48% 90 More than once a month 19.26% 89 A couple times a year 24.89% 115 Very rarely 29.65% 137 Other (please specify) 6.71% 31 Total 462 2 / 12 A-3 Appendix A - Public Survey Transit Needs Assessment Survey Q3 What modes of transit do you use? Answered: 432 Skipped: 36 MTA Bus MTA Commuter Bus Local Bus service MARC trains Baltimore Metro (Subway) Light Rail Charm
    [Show full text]
  • Frog Ferry Presentation
    Frog Ferry Portland-Vancouver Passenger Water Taxi Service Frog= Shwah-kuk in the Chinookan Tribal Language, Art: Adam McIssac CONFIDENTIAL-Susan Bladholm Version 2018 Q1 Canoes and Frog Mythology on the Columbia & Willamette Rivers The ability to travel the waters of the Columbia and Willamette rivers has allowed people to become intertwined through trade and commerce for centuries by canoe. The journal entries of Lewis and Clark in 1805 described the shores of the Columbia River as being lined with canoes elaborately carved from cedar trees. The ability to navigate these waterways gave the Chinook people control over vast reaches of the Columbia River basin for hundreds of years. The area surrounding the Columbia and Willamette rivers is steeped in a rich mythology told to us through early ethnographers who traveled the river documenting Native American inhabitants and their culture. According to Chinookan mythology, Frog (Shwekheyk in Chinook language), was given the basics of weavable fiber by his relatives, Snake and omnipotent Coyote. With this fiber, Frog was given the task of creating the cordage for the weaving of the first fishing net. With this net, made from fibers of nettle plants, Frog had made it possible for the new human beings to catch their first salmon. Coyote tested the net, with the guidance and wisdom of his three sisters, thereby establishing the complex set of taboos associated with the catching of the first salmon of the season. The Chinook people would never eat or harm Frog for his association to them would always protect him. That is why you should always step around frogs and never over them.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam | Cambodia | Laos | Myanmar
    Vietnam | Cambodia | Laos | Myanmar Introduction Cambodia Most people know of Cambodia as home to the crowning glory of Southeast Asia – the magnificent temples at Angkor Wat, but visitors are often surprised at how much more this small country has to offer. Angkor Wat is simply unmissable, but take a little more time to explore Phnom Penh, the exciting, bustling gateway to the country; Tonle Sap lake, the largest in Southeast Asia; Sihanoukville, an increasingly chic beach destination; and Mekong River town Kratie, where lucky visitors may spot endangered Mekong river dolphins. For those wishing to learn more about the country’s recent history, Tuol Sleng prison and the ‘Killing Fields’ of Choeung Ek provide a chilling insight into Cambodia’s darkest hours. Cambodia is at once captivating, enchanting, confronting and inspirational. The country has emerged from a tumultuous period of civil war with a renewed sense of creativity and optimism. Be charmed by its friendly, welcoming people, and explore the country's rich heritage, from religious monuments and colonial-era architecture to a thriving art scene. Phnompenh The Cambodia ’s commercial and political hub. It is also the gateway to the tem- ples of Angkor in the west, the beaches of Sihanoukville on the southern coast and the hill tribe minority in the Northern Province . Revitalized capital city with temples and French colonial architecture blended with a cosmopolitan restau- rants, hotels, and night life scenes.The capital of Cambodia dates back to an event in the year 1327. It is said that a rich widow named Don Penh found a tree with 5 Buddhas in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Education in Urban Street Schools: Cambodia
    Benjamin D. Carson Tillinghast 329 Office Hours: TBD Office Phone: 508-531-1456 Email: [email protected] Education in Urban Street Schools: Cambodia Course Description: This short-term international travel course offers graduate students the opportunity to teach basic English to students living in the “slums” of Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Students, in multiple mandatory pre-departure meetings, will design the curriculum (e.g. educational lessons/games, etc.) they will deliver in the four Empowering Youth in Cambodia (EYC) schools, all of which are located in some of the poorest neighborhoods in Phnom Penh. While it is not necessary to be in education or have a background in teaching to take this course, the ideal student would be one who has some experience working with children between the ages of five and thirteen, is patient, flexible, and gets along well with others, even when hot, tired, and dirty. In addition to working in the EYC schools, we will spend at least one day installing bio-sand filters with Water for Cambodia (W4C) in the rural villages outside of Siem Reap. While in Phnom Penh, we will also visit Mother’s Heart Cambodia, the only crisis pregnancy center in Cambodia. Because EYC, W4C, and Mother’s Heart are non-governmental organizations (NGOs), they rely entirely on donations. Figured into the cost of this trip is a $600 donation for EYC and a $500 donation for Water for Cambodia. This covers a month’s salary for four EYC teachers and buys ten bio-sand filters for W4C. We’ll also donate school supplies to EYC and baby clothes to Mother’s Heart.
    [Show full text]
  • Turn Teav: a Study of a Cambodian Literary Classic
    Turn Teav: A Study of a Cambodian Literary Classic George V. Chigas II Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Of the University of London (School of Oriental and African Studies) 2001 ProQuest Number: 10731710 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10731710 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 Abstract One of the cornerstones of the Cambodian literary canon is the verse novel Turn Teav. There are numerous versions o f the story that cover all the major modes of creative expression in Cambodian culture. In addition to the literary and theatrical versions, the story also appears in different historical texts, as it is generally believed that the characters described in the story are based on actual people and events in Cambodian history. Despite Turn Teav's tremendous importance and popularity however, there are no studies that examine the extensive literary criticism on the text or the influence of the story in contemporary Cambodian culture and society. This work is an attempt to present an overview o f the literary criticism on Turn Teav and provide the reader with an insight into the viewpoints of contemporary Cambodian writers and intellectuals on the major themes in the story.
    [Show full text]