DOCSLIB.ORG

Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance C 2 0 o 1 n 3 d S t i a t t i u o s n o s f & t h e P N e a r t f i 2013 Status of the Nation’s o o n r ’ s m H Highways, Bridges, and Transit: a i n g h c w e a y s , Conditions & Performance B r i d g e s , a n d T r a n s i t : U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration REPORT TO CONGRESS Table of Contents List of Exhibits ......................................................................................................................................xi Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................xxiii Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... xxix Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................ES-1 Chapter Overviews Part I: Description of Current System ...............................................................................CO-1 Chapter 1: Household Travel ..............................................................................................CO-2 Chapter 1: Freight Movement .............................................................................................CO-3 Chapter 2: System Characteristics: Highways and Bridges .............................................CO-4 Chapter 2: System Characteristics: Transit .......................................................................CO-5 Chapter 3: System Conditions: Highways .........................................................................CO-6 Chapter 3: System Conditions: Transit ..............................................................................CO-7 Chapter 4: Safety: Highways ..............................................................................................CO-8 Chapter 4: Safety: Transit ...................................................................................................CO-9 Chapter 5: System Performance: Highways ....................................................................CO-10 Chapter 5: System Performance: Transit .........................................................................CO-11 Chapter 6: Finance: Highways .........................................................................................CO-12 Chapter 6: Finance: Transit ...............................................................................................CO-13 Part II: Investment/Performance Analysis ......................................................................CO-14 Chapter 7: Potential Capital Investment Impacts: Highways..........................................CO-16 Chapter 7: Potential Capital Investment Impacts: Transit ...............................................CO-17 Chapter 8: Selected Capital Investment Scenarios: Highways ......................................CO-18 Chapter 8: Selected Capital Investment Scenarios: Transit ...........................................CO-19 Chapter 9: Supplemental Scenario Analysis: Highways .................................................CO-20 Chapter 9: Supplemental Scenario Analysis: Transit ......................................................CO-21 Chapter 10: Sensitivity Analysis: Highways ....................................................................CO-22 Chapter 10: Sensitivity Analysis: Transit .........................................................................CO-23 Chapter 11: Transportation Serving Federal and Tribal Lands .......................................CO-24 Chapter 12: Center for Accelerating Innovation ..............................................................CO-25 Chapter 13: National Fuel Cell Bus Program ...................................................................CO-26 Part I: Description of Current System ............................................................................................... I-1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ I-2 U.S. DOT Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................ I-2 Performance Management ........................................................................................................ I-3 Chapter 1: Household Travel and Freight Movement ........................................................... 1-1 Household Travel ............................................................................................................ 1-2 Trends in Our Nation’s Travel ................................................................................................... 1-3 Geographic Trends in Trip Rates and Trip Lengths ................................................................. 1-4 The Determinants of Travel ...................................................................................................... 1-6 Travel by Time of Day ............................................................................................................... 1-7 Usual and Actual Commute: A Typical Day Versus a Specific Day ........................................ 1-7 Baby Boomer Travel Trends ..................................................................................................... 1-8 Travel of Millennials .................................................................................................................. 1-9 Table of Contents iii Aging of the Household Vehicle Fleet ................................................................................... 1-10 Some Myths and Facts About Daily Travel ............................................................................ 1-11 Myth 1: The majority of personal travel is for commuting to work ........................................ 1-11 Myth 2: Americans love their cars, and that’s why they don’t walk or take transit ............... 1-11 Myth 3: Households without vehicles rely completely on transit, walk, and bike ................. 1-12 Myth 4: When elderly drivers give up their driver’s license they maintain mobility by using transit or walking instead of using private vehicles ................................................ 1-15 Myth 5: We can solve congestion by having people shift noncommuting trips outside of peak periods.......................................................................................................... 1-16 Gas Prices and the Public’s Opinions ................................................................................... 1-16 Number One Issue for the Public: Price of Travel .................................................................. 1-17 Freight Movement ......................................................................................................... 1-18 Freight Transportation System ............................................................................................... 1-18 Freight Transportation Demand ............................................................................................. 1-18 Freight Challenges ................................................................................................................. 1-26 Chapter 2: System Characteristics ....................................................................................... 2-1 Highway System Characteristics .................................................................................... 2-2 Roads by Ownership ................................................................................................................ 2-2 Roads by Purpose .................................................................................................................... 2-3 Review of Functional Classification Concepts ......................................................................... 2-3 System Characteristics ............................................................................................................. 2-5 Highway Travel ......................................................................................................................... 2-8 Federal-Aid Highways ............................................................................................................ 2-11 National Highway System ...................................................................................................... 2-12 Interstate System .................................................................................................................... 2-14 Highway Freight System ........................................................................................................ 2-14 Changes under MAP-21 ......................................................................................................... 2-15 Bridge System Characteristics ...................................................................................... 2-17 Bridges by Owner ................................................................................................................... 2-17 Interstate, STRAHNET, and NHS Bridges .............................................................................. 2-18 Bridges by Roadway Functional Classification .................................................................... 2-19 Bridges by Traffic Volume ...................................................................................................... 2-21 Transit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report
    Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2019 Progress Report December 2019 Progress Report i This page intentionally left blank. ii Interstate Bridge Replacement Program December 2, 2019 (Electronic Transmittal Only) The Honorable Governor Inslee The Honorable Kate Brown WA Senate Transportation Committee Oregon Transportation Commission WA House Transportation Committee OR Joint Committee on Transportation Dear Governors, Transportation Commission, and Transportation Committees: On behalf of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), we are pleased to submit the Interstate Bridge Replacement Program status report, as directed by Washington’s 2019-21 transportation budget ESHB 1160, section 306 (24)(e)(iii). The intent of this report is to share activities that have lead up to the beginning of the biennium, accomplishments of the program since funding was made available, and future steps to be completed by the program as it moves forward with the clear support of both states. With the appropriation of $35 million in ESHB 1160 to open a project office and restart work to replace the Interstate Bridge, Governor Inslee and the Washington State Legislature acknowledged the need to renew efforts for replacement of this aging infrastructure. Governor Kate Brown and the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) directed ODOT to coordinate with WSDOT on the establishment of a project office. The OTC also allocated $9 million as the state’s initial contribution, and Oregon Legislative leadership appointed members to a Joint Committee on the Interstate Bridge. These actions demonstrate Oregon’s agreement that replacement of the Interstate 5 Bridge is vital. As is conveyed in this report, the program office is working to set this project up for success by working with key partners to build the foundation as we move forward toward project development.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in Vietnam! Beheiren: Transnational Activism and Gi Movement in Postwar Japan 1965-1974
    PEACE IN VIETNAM! BEHEIREN: TRANSNATIONAL ACTIVISM AND GI MOVEMENT IN POSTWAR JAPAN 1965-1974 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AUGUST 2018 By Noriko Shiratori Dissertation Committee: Ehito Kimura, Chairperson James Dator Manfred Steger Maya Soetoro-Ng Patricia Steinhoff Keywords: Beheiren, transnational activism, anti-Vietnam War movement, deserter, GI movement, postwar Japan DEDICATION To my late father, Yasuo Shiratori Born and raised in Nihonbashi, the heart of Tokyo, I have unforgettable scenes that are deeply branded in my heart. In every alley of Ueno station, one of the main train stations in Tokyo, there were always groups of former war prisoners held in Siberia, still wearing their tattered uniforms and playing accordion, chanting, and panhandling. Many of them had lost their limbs and eyes and made a horrifying, yet curious, spectacle. As a little child, I could not help but ask my father “Who are they?” That was the beginning of a long dialogue about war between the two of us. That image has remained deep in my heart up to this day with the sorrowful sound of accordions. My father had just started work at an electrical laboratory at the University of Tokyo when he found he had been drafted into the imperial military and would be sent to China to work on electrical communications. He was 21 years old. His most trusted professor held a secret meeting in the basement of the university with the newest crop of drafted young men and told them, “Japan is engaging in an impossible war that we will never win.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Report
    Report to the Washington State Legislature Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory December 2017 Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory Errata The Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory published to WSDOT’s website on December 1, 2017 contained the following errata. The items below have been corrected in versions downloaded or printed after January 10, 2018. Section 4, page 62: Corrects the parties to the tolling agreement between the States—the Washington State Transportation Commission and the Oregon Transportation Commission. Miscellaneous sections and pages: Minor grammatical corrections. Columbia River I-5 Bridge Planning Inventory | December 2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary. .1 Section 1: Introduction. .29 Legislative Background to this Report Purpose and Structure of this Report Significant Characteristics of the Project Area Prior Work Summary Section 2: Long-Range Planning . .35 Introduction Bi-State Transportation Committee Portland/Vancouver I-5 Transportation and Trade Partnership Task Force The Transition from Long-Range Planning to Project Development Section 3: Context and Constraints . 41 Introduction Guiding Principles: Vision and Values Statement & Statement of Purpose and Need Built and Natural Environment Navigation and Aviation Protected Species and Resources Traffic Conditions and Travel Demand Safety of Bridge and Highway Facilities Freight Mobility Mobility for Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Travel Section 4: Funding and Finance. 55 Introduction Funding and Finance Plan Evolution During
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Still Doesn't Have Any Reporting on Direct Queries and Submissions To: Recent Developments in U.S
    N ewsletter NoVEMbER, 1991 VolUME 5 NuMbER 5 SpEciAl JournaL Issue In This Issue................................................................ 2 The Speed of DAnksess ancI "CrazecJ V ets on tHe oorstep rama e o s e PublJshER's S tatement, by Ka U TaL .............................5 D D ," by DAvId J. D R ...............40 REMF Books, by DAvid WHLs o n .............................. 45 A nnouncements, Notices, & Re p o r t s ......................... 4 eter C ortez In DarIen, by ALan FarreU ........................... 22 PoETRy, by P D ssy............................................4 4 FIctIon: Hie Romance of Vietnam, VoIces fROM tHe Past: TTie SearcTi foR Hanoi HannaK by RENNy ChRlsTophER...................................... 24 by Don NortTi ...................................................44 A FiREbAlL In tBe Nlqlrr, by WHUam M. KiNq...........25 H ollyw ood CoNfidENTlAl: 1, b y FREd GARdNER........ 50 Topics foR VJetnamese-U.S. C ooperation, PoETRy, by DennIs FRiTziNqER................................... 57 by Tran Qoock VuoNq....................................... 27 Ths A ll CWnese M ercenary BAskETbAll Tournament, Science FIctIon: This TIme It's War, by PauI OLim a r t ................................................ 57 by ALascIaIr SpARk.............................................29 (Not Much of a) War Story, by Norman LanquIst ...59 M y Last War, by Ernest Spen cer ............................50 Poetry, by Norman LanquIs t ...................................60 M etaphor ancI War, by GEORqE LAkoff....................52 A notBer
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River – White Salmon Interstate Bridge Replacement Project SDEIS
    (OR SHPO Case No. 19-0587; WA DAHP Project Tracking Code: 2019-05-03456) Draft Historic Resources Technical Report October 1, 2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: In coordination with: 111 SW Columbia 851 SW Sixth Avenue Suite 1500 Suite 1600 Portland, Oregon 97201 Portland, Oregon 97204 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Project Alternatives ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. No Action Alternative .......................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Preferred Alternative EC-2 ................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Alternative EC-1 ................................................................................................................ 14 2.4. Alternative EC-3 ................................................................................................................ 19 2.5. Construction of the Build Alternatives ............................................................................... 23 3. Methodology ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conscientiously Objecting to War James M
    1 Conscientiously Objecting to War James M. Skelly lthough I will talk tonight about my own experience of conscientiously objecting to war, I want to try to put it into a larger context by first talking about the experiences of other sol- Adiers. What I hope I can accomplish by doing this is to demonstrate that we must allow for objection to war regardless of whether it is conscientious or not. The structure of war has changed profoundly in the last century. The tactics of Al Qaeda are just a further mani- festation of that transformation. War is no longer fought between armies where soldiers suffer the overwhelming number of casual- ties. Although civilians died in pre-20th century wars, soldiers made up 90% of the casualties. Now the ratio is reversed – 90% of the casualties are civilian – a ratio that the war in Iraq continued despite all the talk of so-called “precision” weapons. Some of you may have seen CNN’s recent documentary called “Fit to Kill,” which explored the psychological consequences of the training and experiences of soldiers who had killed in combat. One of the former soldiers interviewed, Charles Sheehan Miles, was a veteran of the first Gulf War in 1991. During operations in Iraq he and his colleagues had engaged two Iraqi trucks that subsequently caught fire. As one of the occupants ran ablaze from the truck, Miles fired his machine gun and immediately killed him. ______________ Presented on November 18, 2003, as part of the Baker Institute World Affairs Lectures 2004 25 His immediate emotional response was a “sense of exhilara- tion, of joy.” These emotions were followed in a split-second by what he characterized as “a tremendous feeling of guilt and remorse.” The image of the man on fire, running, as our young sol- dier killed him, stayed with him “for years and years and years,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement
    I N T E R S TAT E 5 C O L U M B I A R I V E R C ROSSING Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement May 2011 Title VI The Columbia River Crossing project team ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefits and services resulting from its federally assisted programs and activities. For questions regarding WSDOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7098. For questions regarding ODOT’s Title VI Program, you may contact the Department’s Civil Rights Office at (503) 986-4350. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information If you would like copies of this document in an alternative format, please call the Columbia River Crossing (CRC) project office at (360) 737-2726 or (503) 256-2726. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may contact the CRC project through the Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing 7-1-1. ¿Habla usted español? La informacion en esta publicación se puede traducir para usted. Para solicitar los servicios de traducción favor de llamar al (503) 731-4128. Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank. May 2011 Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement Cover Sheet Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement: Submitted By: Derek Chisholm Mike Gallagher Rosalind Keeney Elisabeth Leaf Julie Osborne Saundra Powell Jessica Roberts Megan Taylor Parametrix May 2011 Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing Historic Built Environment Technical Report for the Final Environmental Impact Statement This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Lori Wallach Director, Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch
    Testimony of Lori Wallach Director, Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch before U.S. International Trade Commission on “Economic Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Authorities Procedures, 2021 Report” October 2, 2020 Lori Wallach, Director Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave. SE Washington, D.C. 20003 [email protected] 202-546-4996 Mister Chairman and members of the Commission, thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the economic impact of trade agreements implemented since 1985 under trade authorities procedures so as to contribute to the Section 105(f)(2) report required by the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015. I am Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch. Public Citizen is a national public interest organization with more than 500,000 members and supporters. For more than 45 years, we have advocated with some considerable success for consumer protections and more generally for government and corporate accountability. It is critical that the Commission’s evaluation of the economic impacts of the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) negotiated by the U.S. government under trade authorities procedures (Fast Track) provides accurate and trustworthy information to policymakers and the general public about the agreements’ actual outcomes. In many communities nationwide, decades of trade agreements negotiated on a model established with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have caused economic damage to many and fueled anger and despair. The dwindling ranks of defenders of that model argue that it was not trade, but other policies and trends that have caused the problems people “blame” on trade pacts.
    [Show full text]
  • (Interstate Tol1 Bridge) State Route 433 Spanning Langview Ca
    LONGVIEW BRIDGE HAER No. WA-89 (Lewis & Clark Bridge) (Columbia River Bridge) (Interstate Tol1 Bridge) State Route 433 spanning the Columbia River Langview Cawlitz County Washington > WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA PHOTDBRAPHS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERINS RECORD NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR P.O. BOX 37127 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20013-7127 r H*E£ HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD LONGVIEW BRIDGE (Lewis and Clark Bridge) I- * (Columbia River Bridge) (Interstate Toll Bridge) HAER No. WA-89 Location: State Route 433 spanning the Columbia River between Multnomah County, Oregon and Cowlitz County, Washington; beginning at milepost 0.00 on state route 433. UTM: 10/503650/5106420 10/502670/5104880 Quad: Rainier, Oreg.-Wash, Date of Construction: 1930 Engineer: Joseph B. Strauss, Strauss Engineering Corp., Chicago, IL Fabricator/Builder: Bethlehem Steel Company, Steelton, PA, general contractor Owner: 1927-1935: Columbia River—Longview Bridge Company. 1936-1947: Longview Bridge Company operated by Bethlehem Steel. 1947-1965: Washington Toll Bridge Authority. 1965 to present: Washington Department of Highways, since 1977, Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington• Present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian traffic Significance: The Longview Bridge, designed by engineer Joseph B. Strauss, was at time of construction the longest cantilever span in North America with its 1,200' central section. Extreme vertical and horizontal shipping channel requirements requested by Portland, Oregon, as a means to prevent the bridge's construction created the reason for such an imposing structure. Historian: Robert W. Hadlow, Ph.D., August 1993 LONGVIEW BRIDGE • HAER No. WA-89 (Page 2) History of the Bridge The Longview Bridge was built as part of an entrepreneurial dream to make the city of Longviev a thriving Columbia River port city.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S.S.F. Show: 'About Face'
    ABOUT FACE! THE US. SERVICEMEN'S FUND NEWSLETTER ISSUE NUMBER ONE MAY 1971 THE U.S.S.F. SHOW: 'ABOUT FACE'... We are pleased to introduce the first issue of ABOUT FACE; The USSF Newsletter, which will become a regular publication for USSF sup­ porters. In this way we hope to keep you informed of major new developments in USSF programs and policies (see this page) as well as activities of the GI newspapers and projects which USSF supports In the past two years since USSF began to function, the number of "coffeehouse" projects providing services for military personnel which recieve USSF support has grown from three to thirteen. At these places servicemen and women can congregate in an atmosphere free from military coercion or commercial exploitation. The pro­ grams supported by USSF at these places include films, libraries, 'a positive alternative' mere entertainment event that threw discussion of current social issues the military hierarchy into a frantic and entertainers (including the USSF attempt to keep it's new "liberal" ON MARCH 13th AND 14th AT THE Show, this page). Since USSF was public relations image untarnished, founded the number of GI newspapers Haymarket Square Coffeehouse, in and at the same time make sure Fayetteville, North Carolina, the written and published by and for that the performance of a satirical members of the military has grown USSF Show was presented to over review didn't get anywhere near GIs. 1, 500 servicemen and women. The from less than ten to well over a A liberal Army will suppress and hundred.
    [Show full text]
  • Interstate 5 Columbia River Crossing
    I NTERSTATE 5 C OLUMBIA R IVER C ROSSING Neighborhoods and Population Technical Report May 2008 TO: Readers of the CRC Technical Reports FROM: CRC Project Team SUBJECT: Differences between CRC DEIS and Technical Reports The I-5 Columbia River Crossing (CRC) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) presents information summarized from numerous technical documents. Most of these documents are discipline- specific technical reports (e.g., archeology, noise and vibration, navigation, etc.). These reports include a detailed explanation of the data gathering and analytical methods used by each discipline team. The methodologies were reviewed by federal, state and local agencies before analysis began. The technical reports are longer and more detailed than the DEIS and should be referred to for information beyond that which is presented in the DEIS. For example, findings summarized in the DEIS are supported by analysis in the technical reports and their appendices. The DEIS organizes the range of alternatives differently than the technical reports. Although the information contained in the DEIS was derived from the analyses documented in the technical reports, this information is organized differently in the DEIS than in the reports. The following explains these differences. The following details the significant differences between how alternatives are described, terminology, and how impacts are organized in the DEIS and in most technical reports so that readers of the DEIS can understand where to look for information in the technical reports. Some technical reports do not exhibit all these differences from the DEIS. Difference #1: Description of Alternatives The first difference readers of the technical reports are likely to discover is that the full alternatives are packaged differently than in the DEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosperity Undermined
    Prosperity Undermined The Status Quo Trade Model’s 21-Year Record of Massive U.S. Trade Deficits, Job Loss and Wage Suppression www.tradewatch.org August 2015 Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Published August 2015 by Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that serves as the people's voice in the nation's capital. Since our founding in 1971, we have delved into an array of areas, but our work on each issue shares an overarching goal: To ensure that all citizens are represented in the halls of power. For four decades, we have proudly championed citizen interests before Congress, the executive branch agencies and the courts. We have successfully challenged the abusive practices of the pharmaceutical, nuclear and automobile industries, and many others. We are leading the charge against undemocratic trade agreements that advance the interests of mega- corporations at the expense of citizens worldwide. As the federal government wrestles with critical issues – fallout from the global economic crisis, health care reform, climate change and so much more – Public Citizen is needed now more than ever. We are the countervailing force to corporate power. We fight on behalf of all Americans – to make sure your government works for you. We have five policy groups: our Congress Watch division, the Energy Program, Global Trade Watch, the Health Research Group and our Litigation Group. Public Citizen is a nonprofit organization that does not participate in partisan political activities or endorse any candidates for elected office. We accept no government or corporate money – we rely solely on foundation grants, publication sales and support from our 300,000 members.
    [Show full text]