DOCSLIB.ORG

Potlight on Iran S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Potlight on Iran S Spotlight on Iran May 2, 2013—Ordibehesht 12, 1392 Editor: Dr. Raz Zimmt The Holocaust denial policy has become one of the bones of contention in the Iranian presidential elections President Ahmadinejad’s policy of Holocaust denial has become one of the bones of contention in the Iranian presidential elections, slated for June 14. In recent days it has been criticized by the president’s political rivals, who said that it causes damage to Iran’s foreign policy and plays into Israel’s hands. On the other hand, radical right-wing elements in the conservative camp have expressed support for the Holocaust denial policy, arguing that it is in line with the legacy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic revolution, and with the statements made by Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran. The debate surrounding the policy of Holocaust denial resumed after the policy was criticized by the mayor of Tehran in a recent interview he gave to the press. The criticism was echoed by other potential candidates for president, including former Majles Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel, former Revolutionary Guards Chief and Expediency Discernment Council Secretary Mohsen Reza’i, Deputy Majles Speaker Mohammad Hassan Abu-Torabi Fard, and Mohammad Shariatmadari, the former minister of commerce in Mohammad Khatami’s government. Media affiliated with the president’s political rivals also criticized his policy on the Holocaust. The president’s critics did not question the validity of his arguments and views, or bring up a moral and value-based argument that the Holocaust did happen. On the other side of the debate, the criticism of the Holocaust denial policy drew strong reactions from elements in the radical right-wing faction of the conservative camp. Media affiliated with this faction – including some that in recent years have voiced reservations about the president’s policy and his association with the “deviant faction” – argued that Holocaust denial is consistent with the principles of the regime. Kamran Bagheri Lankarani, the presidential candidate for the Steadfast Front, also justified the policy of denying the Holocaust. The Holocaust denial policy also became a controversial topic in the 2009 presidential elections. Then, as in the current election campaign, the criticism of this policy could be seen as part of a larger attack mounted by the president’s opponents against his provocative foreign policy, rather than as authentic criticism of making political use of the Holocaust to advance the regime’s objectives and delegitimize Israel. 065-13 2 President Ahmadinejad’s policy of Holocaust denial has become one of the bones of contention in the Iranian presidential elections, slated for June 14. In recent days it has been criticized by the president’s political rivals, who said that it causes damage to Iran’s foreign policy and plays into Israel’s hands. On the other hand, radical right-wing elements in the conservative camp have expressed support for the Holocaust denial policy, arguing that it is in line with the legacy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic revolution, and with the statements made by Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran. The president’s political rivals and the Holocaust denial policy The debate surrounding the policy of Holocaust denial resumed following an interview given to the press by Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, the mayor of Tehran, on April 23. Qalibaf, considered one of the president’s strongest political rivals, is one of the most notable potential election candidates in the conservative camp. In the interview given to the Tasnim News agency, Qalibaf said that denying the Holocaust has not served Iran’s interests, and that it has only given its Zionist enemies an excuse to mobilize broad-based international agreement against the Iranian policy, including the nuclear policy. He stressed that while supporting the Palestinians is one of the principles of Iran’s foreign policy, denying the Holocaust is not. The Iranians have never been opposed to Jews, only to Zionists, Qalibaf said. Iran has supported the aspirations of the Palestinian people for 30 years, but thanks to the wisdom of Khomeini and Khamenei, it has never been accused of anti-Semitism. The president’s bringing up the Holocaust issue has contributed nothing to the revolution or to the Palestinians (www.tasnimnews.com/Home/Single/45881). The criticism was echoed by other potential candidates for president, including former Majles Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad Adel, former Revolutionary Guards Chief and Expediency Discernment Council Secretary Mohsen Reza’i, Deputy Majles Speaker Mohammad Hassan Abu-Torabi Fard, and Mohammad Shariatmadari, the former minister of commerce in Mohammad Khatami’s government. Haddad Adel, who has partnered with Qalibaf and the Supreme Leader’s International Advisor Ali-Akbar Velayati in the conservative Coalition for Progress, formed for the presidential elections, announced at a meeting with students in Tehran that he did not agree with the president’s policy of Holocaust denial because it allowed the Israelis to use it as an excuse to act against Iran 065-13 3 (http://www.mehrnews.com/detail/News/2042506). Abu-Torabi Fard, member of the Coalition of Five, another conservative coalition formed for the elections, defined the Holocaust denial policy as “ill-considered” and argued that it did not do any good for the revolution (http://fararu.com/fa/news/147914). Mohsen Reza’i, who will likely run as an independent candidate in the coming elections, said at a student conference held at the Orumiyeh University in north Iran on April 18 that if he was president, he would choose another way to contend with Israel and would not be talking about the Holocaust (http://khabaronline.ir/detail/287756). Mohammad Shariatmadari, who is considered to be close to the reformist faction, also argued that bringing up the issue of the Holocaust has done no good for Iran, and that Ahmadinejad himself regretted the statements he had made on the issue, which is why he did not reiterate them later on. He noted that the argument according to which the Zionists occupied Palestine because of the Holocaust is incorrect, and that the occupation of Palestine has nothing to do with the Holocaust (http://www.etemaad.ir/Released/92-02-11/204.htm#237090). Holocaust deniers’ conference in Tehran, December 2006 Media affiliated with the president’s political rivals also criticized his policy of Holocaust denial, which he has promoted since assuming office in 2005. An article published in Tehran Emrooz, a daily affiliated with the mayor of Tehran, said that Iran has to pursue its struggle against its enemies in such a way that will not give them excuses to hit the main objectives of the revolution. The article, written by poet and journalist Mohammad Hossein Ja’farian, said that the manner in which the president brought up the issue of the Holocaust did not help the Palestinians and only damaged Iran’s vital interests. The Israelis themselves admitted, according to Ja’farian, that the Holocaust denial helped 065-13 4 Israel win international support against Iran. The aspirations of the Palestinian people are to be supported by providing assistance to Hezbollah and Hamas, not by parroting perfectly useless remarks made by advisors (http://tehrooz.com/1392/2/7/TehranEmrooz/1154/Page/16). Farda News, a website affiliated with the pragmatic wing of the conservative camp, also argued that Holocaust denial has galvanized public opinion. In addition, not only it did not step up pressure on Israel, it also gave legitimacy to its illegal claims in Europe and the United States. The website noted that while pre-Ahmadinejad Iranian leaders also brought up the issue of the Holocaust, they did so to point out the hypocrisy of the Western countries when it comes to the freedom of expression, not to start a historical debate on the subject. The website stressed that the criticism of Ahmadinejad bringing up the issue isn’t targeted at the substance of his claims about the reality of the Holocaust but rather at the use of bringing up the issue and the heavy price Iran had to pay as a result. Bringing up the issue was a contributing factor for the resolutions passed by the U.N. Security Council on the anti-Iranian sanctions. It also strengthened the anti-Islamic school of thought in the Western media. Israel, on the other hand, benefited greatly from it. The U.N. General Assembly approved the decision to put Holocaust deniers on trial and Israel took advantage of Ahmadinejad’s Holocaust denial to mobilize the Western countries and a considerable part of world public opinion to support its military threats against Iran (http://www.fardanews.com/fa/news/259097). However, the president’s critics did not question the validity of his arguments and views, or bring up a moral and value-based argument that the Holocaust did happen. Support for the Holocaust denial policy from the radical right On the other side of the debate, the criticism of the Holocaust denial policy drew strong reactions from the radical right-wing faction of the conservative camp. The Bibak News website argued that Qalibaf’s remarks go against the position of the Supreme Leader. The website listed several examples from speeches given by Khamenei these past several years in which he supported questioning the reality of the “Holocaust myth”, attacked the Western countries for their policy towards Holocaust deniers, and referred to the Holocaust as an excuse used by the Zionists to justify their aggression against the Palestinians (http://www.bibaknews.com/shownews.php?idnews=2681). 065-13 5 Rasa News, a news agency close to the religious establishment in the city of Qom, also strongly criticized the position taken by the president’s rivals on the issue of Holocaust denial.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biden, Congress Should Defend Terrorism Sanctions Imposed on Iran
    Research memo Biden, Congress Should Defend Terrorism Sanctions Imposed on Iran By Richard Goldberg, Saeed Ghasseminejad, Behnam Ben Taleblu, Matthew Zweig, and Mark Dubowitz January 25, 2021 During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing to consider Antony Blinken’s nomination for secretary of state, Blinken was asked whether he believed it is in America’s national security interest to lift terrorism sanctions currently imposed on Iran, including sanctions targeting Iran’s central bank, national oil company, financial sector, and energy sector. “I do not,” Blinken responded. “And I think there is nothing, as I see it, inconsistent with making sure that we are doing everything possible – including the toughest possible sanctions, to deal with Iranian support for terrorism.”1 Bipartisan support for terrorism sanctions targeting Iran goes back to 1984, when the United States first designated the Islamic Republic as a State Sponsor of Terrorism. Since then, every U.S. president2 – Republican or Democrat – and Congress have taken steps to reaffirm U.S. policy opposing Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism and tying sanctions relief to Iran’s cessation of terror-related activities. President Joe Biden has pledged to rejoin the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), if Iran returns to “strict compliance” with the agreement.3 Terrorism sanctions on Iran, however, should not be lifted, even if the Biden administration opts to return to the deal, unless and until Iran verifiably halts its sponsorship of terrorism. This memorandum provides an overview of Iran’s past and ongoing involvement in terrorism-related activities, a review of longstanding bipartisan congressional support for terrorism sanctions on Iran, and a list of terrorism sanctions currently imposed on Iran that should not be lifted.
    [Show full text]
  • Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads: an Exploration of Iranian Leadership
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Mullahs, Guards, and Bonyads An Exploration of Iranian Leadership Dynamics David E.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuity Despite Revolution: Iran's Support for Non-State Actors
    Crown Family Director Professor of the Practice in Politics Gary Samore Continuity Despite Revolution: Iran’s Director for Research Charles (Corky) Goodman Professor Support for Non-State Actors of Middle East History Naghmeh Sohrabi Associate Director Mohammad Ataie Kristina Cherniahivsky Associate Director for Research he Islamic Republic of Iran supports a number of David Siddhartha Patel Tnon-state actors throughout the Middle East, such as Myra and Robert Kraft Professor Hizbollah in Lebanon and elements of the Iraqi Popular of Arab Politics Eva Bellin Mobilization Forces (al-Hashd al-Sha‘bi). Iranian leaders Founding Director describe their support for such groups in religious and Professor of Politics Shai Feldman revolutionary terms and as resistance against “global arrogance” (Istikbar-i Jahani), meaning imperialism. This aspect Henry J. Leir Professor of the Economics of the Middle East of Iran’s foreign policy, therefore, is widely understood to be a Nader Habibi product of the 1978–79 Iranian Revolution and as motivated, Renée and Lester Crown Professor in large part, by ideology. of Modern Middle East Studies Pascal Menoret In contrast, this Brief argues that Iran’s pattern of support for non-state Founding Senior Fellows entities after 1979, shaped around the so-called Axis of Resistance, is a Abdel Monem Said Aly Khalil Shikaki continuation of a regional policy that dates to the late 1950s and continued through the 1960s and 1970s. Both Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi and the Goldman Faculty Leave Fellow Andrew March leaders of the Islamic Republic pursued a strategy of backing extraterritorial groups and invoking historical and religious ties to Shi‘i communities Harold Grinspoon Junior Research Fellow in the region to counter perceived threats and contain adversaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinian Reconciliation and the Potential of Transitional Justice
    Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper Number 25, March 2019 Palestinian Reconciliation and the Potential of Transitional Justice Mia Swart PALESTINIAN RECONCILIATION AND THE POTENTIAL OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE Mia Swart The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Brookings recognizes that the value it provides to any supporter is in its absolute commitment to quality, independence and impact. Activities supported by its donors reflect this commitment and the analysis and recommendations are not determined by any donation. Copyright © 2019 Brookings Institution THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu BROOKINGS DOHA CENTER Saha 43, Building 63, West Bay, Doha, Qatar www.brookings.edu/doha Table of Contents I. Executive Summary .................................................................................................1 II. Introduction ..........................................................................................................3 III. Background on the Rift Between Fatah and Hamas ...............................................7 IV. The Concept
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿali Hosseini Khamenei
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Out of the Mouth of the Leader: The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce 2013 © Copyright by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce 2013 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Out of the Mouth of the Leader: The Political Ideology of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran by Yvette Hovsepian Bearce Doctor of Philosophy in Islamic Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2013 Professor Leonard Binder, Chair The political ideologies of Ayatollah ʿAli Hosseini Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Iran, are identified and analyzed based on 500 speeches (1989-2013), 100 interviews (1981-1989), his biography and other works published in Iran. Islamic supremacy, resistance to foreign powers, and progress are the core elements of his ideology. Several critical themes emerge that are consistently reflected in the formation of his domestic and foreign policies: America, Palestine, Israel, Muslim unity, freedom, progress, the nuclear program, youth, and religious democracy. Khamenei’s sociopolitical development is examined in three critical phases: In Phase I, prior to the revolution, he is seen as a political activist protesting for an Islamic government; factors shaping his early political ideology are evaluated. Phase II examines Khamenei’s post- ii revolutionary appointments and election to president; he governs the country through the eight- year Iraq-Iran war. After the death of the father of the revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini, Khamenei enters into Phase III when he assumes the office of supreme leadership; internal and external issues test and reveal his political ideologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Iran January 7– January 21, 2018
    רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ה ש ל מ ( למ מ" ) Spotlight on Iran January 7– January 21, 2018 Author: Dr. Raz Zimmt Overview The intention of the United States to establish a military force, comprised of its allies the Syrian Democratic Forces, to police the Turkish and Iraqi borders, has been met with withering criticism by Tehran. Iran, which wishes to expel the United States from the region, or at least minimize its influence in Syria and Iraq, sees the creation of the military force as a plan intended to establish long-term American presence in Syria. This force is perceived as an attempt to stymie Iranian efforts to entrench its influence in Syria in the post-Islamic State era and to prevent the Assad regime from regaining direct control over all of Syria’s territory. The fissures between Iran, Turkey and Russia over the settlement of the war in Syria are increasingly apparent: Turkey’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu, cast the blame on Iran and Russia for the Assad regime’s violations of the de-escalation agreement in the northwestern Idlib governorate. Meanwhile, the Iranian newspaper “Kayhan” published a trenchant editorial concerning Russia’s political plans for Syria’s future. The commentary stated that Iran, the Syrian government and Hezbollah cannot agree to a plan that includes demands for amending the Syrian constitution, changing the political structure in the regime from a presidential system to a parliamentary one, and the establishment of federalism in Syria, which may lead to a bloody and long-lasting civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine by Imam Khomeini
    Palestine by Imam Khomeini INTRODUCTION SECTION ONE ISRAEL THE ENEMY OF ISLAM AND THE MUSLIMS ISRAEL?S EXPANSIONISM (THE PLAN FOR A GREATER ISRAEL) THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN JEWS AND ZIONISTS ISRAEL?S SUPPORTERS SECTION TWO THE LINKS BETWEEN THE SHAH'S REGIME AND ISRAEL IMAM?S STANCE ON ISRAEL BEFORE THE CULMINATION OF THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION (before 1979 [1357 AHS]) Imam's interview with representatives from al-Fatah about assisting the al-Fatah guerrillas SECTION THREE ELUCIDATING THE REASONS FOR THE WEAKNESS OF THE MUSLIMS THE DIVULGENCE OF PLOTS AND TREACHEROUS PLANS THE REJECTION OF ISRAEL?S EXISTENCE AND THE CALL FOR UNITY AND SUPPORT FOR THE STRUGGLE AGAINST ISRAEL ANNOUNCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL QUDS DAY THE REPUDIATION OF POLYTHEISTS DURING HAJJ SECTION FOUR THE IMPOSED WAR AND THE PLOTS BY SOME COUNTRIES AGAINST REVOLUTIONARY IRAN GROUNDLESS ACCUSATIONS (the rumour that the Islamic Republic of Iran has relations with Israel) SECTION FIVE A SHORT HISTORY OF PALESTINE Introduction From various aspects, the victory of the Islamic revolution in Iran resulted in the intensification of the Muslims' campaign against the Zionists and changed the method of the Palestinians' struggle. The Shah's regime was considered a powerful ally for Israel and the West in the sensitive Middle East region. During his reign, Iran was a market for the import of large amounts of Israeli goods causing the economy of the occupying regime to flourish, and in the area of oil, the Shah rushed to its aid by exporting enough to meet its needs. As a result, in the Israeli economic and industrial sectors, Iran's oil was transformed into arms and bullets used to pierce the chests of the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran and the Palestinians
    Iran and the Palestinians Rachel Brandenburg After the 1979 revolution, Iran ended its alliance with Israel and started supporting the Palestinians, symbolized by turning over the Israeli embassy in Tehran to the Palestine Liberation Organization. As part of its campaign to export the revolution, the theocracy also aided emerging Palestinian Islamic groups, notably Islamic Jihad and Hamas. Both sent representatives to Tehran. Iran generally opposed the U.S.-backed Middle East peace process. During the 1997-2005 reform era, however, President Mohammad Khatami indicated that Tehran might accept any decision embraced by the Palestinian majority. But that sentiment was short-lived. Tehran has trained many Palestinian militants and provided a significant proportion of the weaponry used against Israel. For Shiite Iran, the Palestinian groups have been among its most important Sunni allies. The Syrian civil war has strained Iran’s relationship with Palestinian groups, particularly Hamas. Iran backs President Bashar al Assad, an Alawite, and Hamas reportedly supports Sunni rebels seeking to overthrow him. Overview Between Israel’s birth in 1948 and Iran’s revolution in 1979, the two countries had close relations based on common strategic interests, particularly as the two non-Arab countries in the Middle East. Iran became an important source of oil for Israel, and Israel became an important source of weapons for Iran. Thousands of Israeli businessmen and technical experts aided Iranian development projects. But after the shah’s ouster, relations deteriorated and envoys went home. Israel remained a source of Western arms during the early years of Iran’s 1980-1988 war with Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Marco Marsili
    This study was supported by the European Social Fund (FSE) and by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal, under research grant No. SFRH/BD/136170/2018. Panel M06: Transnational Religious Fundamentalism in Eurasia, 24 September 2020, h. 9:00-11:00 CET Middle East Politics: Rightful and Legitimate Institutions or Terror Organizations? Marco Marsili Centro de Investigação do Instituto de Estudos Políticos da Universidade Católica Portuguesa (CIEP-UCP); Centro de Estudos Internacionais (CEI-IUL) do Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL); Centro de Investigação, Desenvolvimento e Inovação da Academia Militar (CINAMIL); Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento do Instituto Universitário Militar (CIDIUM) § Is it reasonable to label state institutions as a "terrorist organizations"? Does it make sense? Is it lawful? § This research is aimed to investigate if a political party represented in a national parliament – or even a state or a government entirety or partially – can be considered a "terror organization", and therefore proscribed. Scope and § Through the analysis of some cases, this study assesses the legitimacy – or the lawfulness – of some Middle East political purpose of institutions. § The research takes into account, inter alia, the case of Hezbollah, a the study radical Islamic Shiite organization based in Lebanon, and the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), a Sunni movement based in Gaza, both backed by the government of Tehran – Iran is also considered. § A broader framework in the region should take
    [Show full text]
  • Hojatoleslam Mahmoud Alavi: Intelligence Minister of Iran December 2020
    Hojatoleslam Mahmoud Alavi: Intelligence Minister of Iran December 2020 1 Table of Contents Alavi Builds a Network ............................................................................................................................. 3 The Deep State ........................................................................................................................................ 3 The Rouhani Administration .................................................................................................................... 4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................... 8 2 Hojatoleslam Mahmoud Alavi Hojatoleslam Mahmoud Alavi’s career has spanned Iran’s armed, deep, and elected states. He has been a legislator, a member of the Assembly of Experts, an appointee of Iran’s supreme leader, and most recently intelligence minister. Alavi is unique in that he has maintained his credibility as a national security decision-maker while simultaneously railing against the securitization of society. At times, this has caused him political problems. This profile will explore Alavi’s trajectory across Iran’s multiple power centers. Alavi Builds a Network Mahmoud Alavi was born in 1954 in Fars Province in Iran but spent much of his childhood in Iraq. He was educated at Ferdowsi University in Mashhad, eventually receiving a Ph.D. in Islamic law. Shortly after the Islamic Revolution, Alavi started his career in the regime, beginning
    [Show full text]
  • Yemen War Heats up Iran's Anti-Saudi Rhetoric | The
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2423 Yemen War Heats Up Iran's Anti-Saudi Rhetoric by Mehdi Khalaji May 18, 2015 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mehdi Khalaji Mehdi Khalaji, a Qom-trained Shiite theologian, is the Libitzky Family Fellow at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis The Islamic Republic views the Yemen conflict as another battlefield in its proxy struggle with Saudi Arabia, spurring Iranian government, media, and religious figures to open a war of words in recent weeks. n May 14, following a meeting with Iraqi president Fuad Masum, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei O warned that "Saudis have made a major mistake in Yemen, and they will certainly get hurt by it." He also emphasized that the "massacre" there should be stopped as soon as possible, and that "an unwise and ignorant mindset among the Saudis is making decisions about Yemen." As the latest arena in which Iran has sought to challenge the United States and its Arab allies, the Yemen conflict has intensified anti-Saudi discourse from Iranian officials and state-controlled media to a level not seen since 1987, when a Saudi crackdown on Iranian demonstrators in Mecca resulted in hundreds of deaths and a temporary cessation of diplomatic ties. Today, the Islamic Republic is once again waging a propaganda war against the House of Saud. OFFICIAL ANTI-SAUDI STATEMENTS I n an April 9 speech, Khamenei warned Riyadh that its Yemen intervention will fail: "The Saudis will definitely lose in this...Their nose will be rubbed to the soil." He explained his prediction: "The military capability of Zionists is many times stronger than the Saudis, and Gaza is a small region, but [Israel] could not succeed there, while Yemen is a vast country with dozens of millions of people." He also declared that "several inexperienced youngsters took over the affairs of [Saudi Arabia] and chose barbarism over decency.
    [Show full text]
  • What Iranian Leaders Really Say About Doing Away with Israel
    WHAT IRANIAN LEADERS REALLY SAY ABOUT DOING AWAY WITH ISRAEL A REFUTATION OF THE CAMPAIGN TO EXCUSE AHMADINEJAD’S INCITEMENT TO GENOCIDE Joshua Teitelbaum Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs המרכז הירושלמי לענייני ציבור ומדינה )ע"ר( © 2008 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-5619281 Fax. 972-2-5619112 Email: [email protected] Website: www.jcpa.org ISBN 978-965-218-065-0 Production Coordinator: Edna Weinstock-Gabay Graphic Design: Studio Rami & Jacky Photo Credits Front cover: AP Photo Back cover: Ahmadinejad speaks during a conference on Oct. 26, 2005, entitled “The World without Zionism.” He stated that Israel should be “wiped off the map,” the official IRNA news agency reported. (AP Photos) 2 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel Acknowledgment The author wishes to thank Dr. Denis MacEoin, most recently Royal Literary Fund Fellow at Newcastle University, for his help with the Persian translations and transliteration. Dr. MacEoin holds a Ph.D. degree in Persian/Islamic Studies from Cambridge University (King’s College). Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 3 4 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel: A Refutation of the Campaign to Excuse Ahmadinejad’s Incitement to Genocide Joshua Teitelbaum • O v e r the past several years, Iranian leaders – most prominently, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad – have made numerous statements calling for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. While certain experts have interpreted these statements to be simple expressions of dissatisfaction with the current Israeli government and its policies, in reality, the intent behind Ahmadinejad’s language and that of others is clear.
    [Show full text]