Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2008/2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Policies, Issues and Trends in 2008/2009 SPACE POLICIES, ISS UES AND TRENDS IN 200 8/2009 Report 18, May 2009 Wolfgang RATHGEBER European Space Policy Institute 1 Report 18, May 2009 DISCLAIMER This Report has been prepared for the client in accordance with the associated contract and ESPI will accept no liability for any losses or damages arising out of the provision of the report to third parties. Short Title: ESPI Report 18, May 2009 Ref.: P23-C20490-03 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6, Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: ESPI, May 2009 Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: ESPI Report 18, May 2009. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc Report 18, May 2009 2 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2008/2009 T ABLE OF C ONTENTS Introduction 5 Chapter 1 – Global political and economic trends 6 1.1. Global economic outlook 6 1.2. Political developments 8 Chapter 2 – Global space sector – size and developments 14 2.1. Global space budgets and revenues 14 2.2. Overview of institutional space budgets 14 2.3. Overview of commercial space markets 17 Chapter 3 – Space policies and strategies around the world 27 3.1 Europe 27 3.2 European Space Agency 27 3.3 European Union 31 3.4 EUMETSAT 32 3.5 National governments 33 3.6 The United States 37 3.7 Russia 43 3.8 Japan 44 3.9 China 45 3.10 India 47 3.11 Emerging space actors 49 3.12 International sectoral comparison 52 Chapter 4 – European institutional market 57 4.1 European institutional features 57 4.2 Civilian space expenditure 58 4.3 European Space Agency (ESA) 58 4.4 EUMETSAT 60 4.5 National agencies 60 4.6 European Union (EU) 62 4.7 Security-related space expenditures 63 Chapter 5 – Space industry evolutions 65 5.1 Industrial evolutions in Europe 65 5.2 Industrial evolutions in the United States 67 5.3 Industrial evolutions in Russia 68 5.4 Industrial evolutions in Japan 69 5.5 Industrial evolutions in China 70 5.6 Transatlantic industrial comparison 71 5.7 Sectoral Overview 72 European Space Policy Institute 3 Report 18, May 2009 Chapter 6 – The defence perspective 83 6.1 Recent trends in military expenditure 83 6.2 Global space military context 83 6.3 Europe 84 6.4 The United States 89 6.5 Russia 91 6.6 Japan 91 6.7 China 92 6.8 India 93 6.9 Other selected space actors 93 Chapter 7 – The specific roles of institutions 95 7.1 European Union 95 7.2 Other European institutions 100 7.3 United Nations (UN) institutions 101 7.4 Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) 105 Acronyms 106 Acknowledgements 111 Report 18, May 2009 4 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2008/2009 Introduction The European Space Agency (ESA) has The basic idea of the report has stayed the repeatedly tasked the European Space Policy same. It aims at describing the European Institute (ESPI) to conduct comprehensive space sector from different perspectives, studies on general issues and trends within accounting for the global context. The the space sector, covering consecutive 12- content provided was gathered by desktop month time frames each. These studies were research, expert interviews and specific input the bases of the subsequent ESPI reports from different bodies all over Europe. In any “Space Policies, Issues and Trends”. Up to case, the information contained is subject to now, the relevant timeframes extended from public accessibility. The basic structure of this July of one year to June of next year. For this year’s report is the one from the previous report, due to a different timing scheme of reports that was set up in 2007 and that ESA, the reporting period for policy events proved to be suitable and resilient. Minor and developments was shortened from July modifications are attributable to the different 2008 to February 2009. On the other hand, boundary conditions. business figures, budget numbers and launch statistics cover the calendar year from January to December 2008 for availability reasons. This twofold approach is analogous to the predecessor reports. European Space Policy Institute 5 Report 18, May 2009 Chapter 1- Global political and economic trends 2008 was marked by the financial crisis and burden for advanced economies importing its worldwide consequences, both in commodities, but had adverse consequences developed countries and emerging for exporting emerging economies. economies. Several ongoing trends were confirmed, such as the political and economic American and European authorities took rise of China, the resurgence of Russia on the extraordinary measures to stabilise the international scene and the limited growth of markets and support demand. State Western economies. Central transnational intervention was widely used as a regulating problems, such as climate change, the tool, on the background of growing criticism energy crisis or terrorism, remained at the of the neoliberal economic model and top of policy agendas. Finally, the election of pressure from the IMF. In October 2008, six Barack Obama as the 44th U.S. American central banks injected 180 billion U.S. dollars President unleashed new expectations about into the monetary markets in a concerted U.S. international policies. action.2 An emergency G20 meeting on the financial crisis in November ended up with a declaration of principles, but no concrete 1.1. Global economic decisions were taken. It was agreed to increase the transparency, the reliability and outlook the effective regulation of the financial markets, to improve the confidence in and for the markets, to increase international 2008 and the first half of 2009 were cooperation and to reform the IMF, the World dominated by the financial crisis. The world Bank and other financial institutions. economy witnessed its most dangerous Furthermore, the G7 finance ministers financial shock since the 1930’s. Global committed themselves to reject any kind of growth slowed substantially in 2008, whereas protectionist measure to fight the crisis energy and commodity prices remained very during a meeting in Rome in February 2009. high in the first part of the year. Many advanced economies were close to or moving The crisis affected every geographical area, into recession, while the growth in emerging and forced the governments to take adequate countries was also weakening. International measures. In the U.S., global activity Monetary Fund (IMF) projections on global declined sharply in the second half of 2008, growth kept being reduced during the last and households were put under severe months of 2008, and the world output was strains, while the budget deficit reached the estimated at 3,7% in 2008, compared to 5% historical pike of 400 billion U.S. dollars a in 2007. The projected global economic 1 year. The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) growth for 2009 is 2%. growth rate was estimated at 1,4% in 2008, compared to 2,0% in 2007, and was The crisis, which started with the subprime projected to be around -0,7% in 2009.3 In mortgage collapse in the U.S. in August 2007, September, the Federal Reserve System reached its peak in September 2008, when the (FED) accorded direct lends to U.S. U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers corporations; in October, a 700 billion U.S. declared bankruptcy. The financial turmoil dollars bailout package was adopted and in rapidly spread to the real economy: the December, a 17 billion U.S. dollars diminished confidence of households had emergency loan for the car industry was negative effects on consumption and investment, and the weakening global demand reduced commodity prices. This lightened the 2 Those were the central banks from the U.S., Great Britain, Canada, Sweden, Switzerland and the European Central Bank (ECB) 1 International Monetary Fund “World Economic Outlook 3 For the following dates in this section, see: International Update: Rapidly weakening prospects call for new policy Monetary Fund “World Economic Outlook Update: Rapidly stimulus.” 6 Nov. 2008 weakening prospects call for new policy stimulus.” 6 Nov. 2008 Report 18, May 2009 6 Space Policies, Issues and Trends 2008/2009 announced. On 13 February 2009, the U.S. during that period. The export shock hit the Congress approved President Obama’s 787 country stronger than expected in the first billion U.S. dollars economic stimulus place, and the production of the automotive package, which intends to fight the crisis with and electronic industries was virtually frozen a mix of tax cuts and federal spending. in the beginning of 2009. European banks were put on exceptional Russia remained relatively untouched by the financial stress as they were exposed to the crisis until summer 2008, before being consequences of the U.S. financial crisis. This affected by the turmoil as well because of had macroeconomic repercussions, as the massive withdrawal of foreign assets from real GDP growth in Europe has stalled and the country. Being very dependent on oil and many countries were close to or into gas exports, Russia was also hit by the recession at the end of 2008. The GDP drastic decrease of oil prices in the second growth rate for the Euro zone was estimated half of 2008. The crisis spread to the real at 1,2% in 2008, which represents an economy, with rising unemployment and important decrease compared to the 2,6% of many oligarchs being close to bankruptcy.
Recommended publications
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 6/2019 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: AUSTRIA ISSN 1617-7983 • Heavy Lift Helicopters • Russian Nuclear Strategy • UAS for Reconnaissance and • NATO Military Engineering CoE Surveillance www.euro-sd.com • Airborne Early Warning • • Royal Norwegian Navy • Brazilian Army • UAS Detection • Cockpit Technology • Swiss “Air2030” Programme Developments • CBRN Decontamination June 2019 • CASEVAC/MEDEVAC Aircraft • Serbian Defence Exports Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ANYTHING. In operations, the Eurofighter Typhoon is the proven choice of Air Forces. Unparalleled reliability and a continuous capability evolution across all domains mean that the Eurofighter Typhoon will play a vital role for decades to come. Air dominance. We make it fly. airbus.com Editorial Europe Needs More Pragmatism The elections to the European Parliament in May were beset with more paradoxes than they have ever been. The strongest party which will take its seats in the plenary chambers in Brus- sels (and, as an expensive anachronism, also in Strasbourg), albeit only for a brief period, is the Brexit Party, with 29 seats, whose programme is implicit in their name. Although EU institutions across the entire continent are challenged in terms of their public acceptance, in many countries the election has been fought with a very great deal of emotion, as if the day of reckoning is dawning, on which decisions will be All or Nothing. Some have raised concerns about the prosperous “European Project”, which they see as in dire need of rescue from malevolent sceptics. Others have painted an image of the decline of the West, which would inevitably come about if Brussels were to be allowed to continue on its present course.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTENNA ODIBILOOP Di I0ZAN Per SWL – BCL (1°Parte) Di I0ZAN Florenzio Zannoni
    Panorama radiofonico internazionale n. 30 Dal 1982 dalla parte del Radioascolto Rivista telematica edita in proprio dall'AIR Associazione Italiana Radioascolto c.p. 1338 - 10100 Torino AD www.air-radio.it l’editoriale ………………. Il 10-11 Maggio si svolgerà a Torino il consueto Meeting radiorama annuale AIR. PANORAMA RADIOFONICO INTERNAZIONALE organo ufficiale dell’A.I.R. Per rendere piu moderna ed interessante la prima giornata, Associazione Italiana Radioascolto recapito editoriale: abbiamo deciso di cambiare formula . radiorama - C. P. 1338 - 10100 TORINO AD e-mail: [email protected] Presentazioni ridotte al minimo. Posto adatto al AIR - radiorama radioascolto, antenne di ricezione a disposizione per esperimenti, - Responsabile Organo Ufficiale: Giancarlo VENTURI - Responsabile impaginazione radiorama:Claudio RE - Responsabile Blog AIR-radiorama: i singoli Autori banchi con ricevitori, accessori ed ausili per il radioascolto a - Responsabile sito web: Emanuele PELICIOLI ------------------------------------------------- disposizione di tutti , con presentazioni di esperienze pratiche in Il presente numero di radiorama e' pubblicato in rete in proprio dall'AIR tempo reale. Associazione Italiana Radioascolto, tramite il server Aruba con sede in località Il tutto ritrasmesso come sempre via Internet, radio e Palazzetto, 4 - 52011 Bibbiena Stazione (AR). Non costituisce testata giornalistica, televisioni, oltre ad essere registrato per poi essere a disposizione non ha carattere periodico ed è aggiornato secondo la disponibilità e la reperibilità dei sul sito AIR. L’evento sarà denominato EXPO AIR . materiali. Pertanto, non può essere considerato in alcun modo un prodotto editoriale ai sensi della L. n. 62 del Bruno Pecolatto 7.03.2001. La responsabilità di quanto Segretario AIR pubblicato è esclusivamente dei singoli Autori.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty Years of Australia in Space
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 153, part 1, 2020, pp. 46–57. ISSN 0035-9173/20/010046-12 Sixty years of Australia in space Kerrie Dougherty Space Humanities Department, International Space University, Strasbourg, France Email: [email protected] Abstract Australia’s involvement in space activities commenced in 1957, at the beginning of the Space Age, with space tracking and sounding rocket launches at Woomera. By 1960, Australia was considered one of the leading space-active nations and in 1967 became one of the earliest countries to launch its own satellite. Yet by 1980, Australia’s space prominence had dwindled, with the country lacking both a national space agency and a coherent national space policy. Despite attempts in the latter part of the 1980s to develop an Australian space industry, the lack of a coherent and consistent national space policy and an effective co-ordinating body, left Australia constantly “punching below its weight” in global space activities until the Twenty First Century. This paper will briefly examine the often-contradictory history of Australian space activities from 1957 to the announcement of the Australian Space Agency in 2017, providing background and context for the later papers in this issue. Introduction Launchpad: the Woomera or 60,000 years the Indigenous people of Rocket Range FAustralia have looked to the sky, using “If the Woomera Range did not already exist, the stars to determine their location, find the proposal that Australia should engage in their way across the land and mark the a program of civil space research would be passage of the seasons and the best times unrealistic”.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Business Review International Mobile Telecommunications Services, Including Wimax
    December 2007 - SPECIAL EDITION: THE TOP-10 SPACE BUSINESS STORIES OF 2007 - #1 - M&A Transactions Keep Pace #5 - 50th Anniversary of Sputnik Despite challenging credit markets, merger, As we celebrate the 50th anniversary of the acquisition and investment activity kept pace in satellite that introduced the “space age”, 2007. Abertis & Caisse des Dépôts et approximately 1,000 satellites now orbit the consignations purchase 32% (€1.07B) and Earth and the space business has grown to 25.5% (€862.7M) stakes, respectively, in more than $100 billion in annual revenues. Eutelsat (Jan.). GE Capital sells back its 19.5% #6 - Satellite Manufacturers Remain Busy interest in SES Global for €588 million in cash 18 commercial satellite orders announced in and assets including stakes in AsiaSat, Star 2007. Ball Aerospace & Technologies: One and Orbcomm (Feb.). JSAT & SKY WorldView-2. EADS Astrium: YahSat 1A Perfect Communications merge (March). BC and 1B, Arabsat 5A, BADR-5 (the foregoing Partners to acquire Intelsat Ltd. for $16.4 billion, in cooperation with Thales Alenia Space) including debt (June). Carlyle Group to acquire and Alphasat 1-XL. Israel Aerospace ARINC (July). Apax Partners France Industries: Amos-4. Lockheed Martin purchases Telenor Satellite Services for $400 Commercial Space Systems: JCSAT-12. million (Sept.). Loral Space & Orbital Sciences Corporation: Optus-D3, Communications and PSP Canada conclude AMC-5R. Space Systems/Loral: Nimiq 5, C$3.25 billion acquisition of Telesat Canada ProtoStar I, Intelsat 14, SIRIUS FM-6, Abertis to acquire 28.4% stake in Hispasat EchoStar XIV, NSS-12. Thales Alenia (Nov.). CIP Canada Investment, indirectly Space: THOR 6, Palapa-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxar Technologies with Respect to Future Events, Financial Performance and Operational Capabilities
    Leading Innovation in the New Space Economy Howard L. Lance President and Chief Executive Officer Forward-Looking Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements and information, which reflect the current view of Maxar Technologies with respect to future events, financial performance and operational capabilities. The forward-looking statements in this presentation include statements as to managements’ expectations with respect to: the benefits of the transaction and strategic and integration opportunities; the company’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions; expectations for sales growth, synergies, earnings and performance; shareholder value; and other statements that are not historical facts. Although management of the Company believes that the expectations and assumptions on which such forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on the forward-looking statements because the Company can give no assurance that they will prove to be correct. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results and experience to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in this presentation. Additional information concerning these risk factors can be found in the Company’s filings with Canadian securities regulatory authorities, which are available online under the Company’s profile at www.sedar.com, the Company’s filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or on the Company’s website at www.maxar.com, and in DigitalGlobe’s filings with the SEC, including Item 1A of DigitalGlobe’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements and are based upon data available as of the date of this release and speak only as of such date.
    [Show full text]
  • Echostar Annual Report Year Ended December 31, 2012 March 20, 2013
    NASDAQ: SATS 100 Inverness Terrace East Englewood, CO 80112 303.706.4000 | echostar.com EchoStar Annual Report Year Ended December 31, 2012 March 20, 2013 Dear EchoStar Corporation Shareholders; 2012 was a very busy year for EchoStar. One of the most exciting accomplishments for 2012 was the addition of two new satellites to our growing fleet through the successful launches of EchoStar XVI and EchoStar XVII, bringing our total number of owned, leased and managed spacecraft to twenty-two. EchoStar operates the world’s fourth largest commercial geostationary satellite fleet and we continue to solidify our position as a premier global leader in satellite communications and operations. EchoStar ended 2012 with revenue of $3.1 billion, a growth of 13% over 2011. EBITDA in 2012 was $794 million, a growth of 64% over 2011. We generated a healthy $508 million of cash from operating activities in 2012 as a result primarily of the strong net income in 2012 and ended the year with a strong balance sheet with $1.5 billion of cash and marketable securities. EchoStar reached two very important long-term North America goals in 2012 with the market implementation of the HughesNet Gen4 service and the roll-out of the Hopper Whole Home DVR solution for DISH. Both solutions are garnering high praise and rapid adoption by consumers, a glowing testament to the capabilities and ingenuity of the EchoStar team. Additional notable accomplishments for 2012 include the very successful introduction of two new Slingbox retail products, several large enterprise contract renewals and new customers for Hughes data network services around the globe, and above-forecast sales of set-top-box products and video services to our established operator customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Telesat Completes Agreements for Satellite Capacity with Bell TV and Echostar Corporation
    Telesat Completes Agreements for Satellite Capacity with Bell TV and EchoStar Corporation Bell TV Commits to Construction of New Canadian Broadcast Satellite and EchoStar Will Use Entire Available Nimiq 5 Payload OTTAWA, Sep. 17, 2009 (Canada NewsWire via COMTEX News Network) -- Telesat, the world's fourth largest fixed satellite services operator, announced today that it has completed agreements for new satellite capacity with two of its key customers, Bell TV and EchoStar Corporation (Nasdaq: SATS). Bell TV, the leading provider of direct-to-home services in Canada, has agreed to utilize a new Telesat direct broadcast satellite which is planned for construction beginning in the first quarter of 2010. The new satellite will augment Bell TV's capacity and capabilities at its prime orbital locations of 82 and 91 degrees West. EchoStar, which had previously contracted for half the capacity of Telesat's new Nimiq 5 satellite, has now committed to use the entire available Nimiq 5 payload for the anticipated 15-year life of the satellite. "We are very pleased to have entered into arrangements that meet the strategic requirements of Bell TV and EchoStar, two longstanding and important Telesat customers," said Dan Goldberg, Telesat's President and CEO. "We look forward to the launch of Nimiq 5 scheduled for later today and beginning construction on the new satellite for Bell TV early next year." Nimiq 5 is scheduled for launch on a Proton rocket September 18th from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan (September 17th in Ottawa) and is intended to operate in geostationary orbit from 72.7 degrees West.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017 A Nasdaq-100 Company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¶VKLVWRULFDOO\ORZSD\79VDWLVIDFWLRQZLWK³7XQHG,Q7R<RX´D',6+79SURPLVHWROLVWHQWRDQG ILJKWIRUFXVWRPHUV:HLQWURGXFHGZKROHKRPHKDQGVIUHH79DVWKHILUVWSD\79SURYLGHUWRLQWHJUDWH$OH[DYRLFHFRQWURO $VWKH\HDUFORVHG',6+79ZDVUDQNHGLQ&XVWRPHU6HUYLFHQDWLRQDOO\E\-'3RZHUDQGRXUFXVWRPHUV 6OLQJ79ZDVWKHILUVWDQGUHPDLQVWKHOHDGLQJOLYHDQGRQGHPDQGVWUHDPLQJVHUYLFH:HEXLOWDGLIIHUHQWPRGHOWKDWJLYHV
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight Plans of Russia, China and India
    Presentation to the ASEB Committee on NASA Technology Roadmaps Panel on Human Health and Surface Exploration June 1, 2011 by Marcia S. Smith Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC Russia Extensive experience in human spaceflight First animal in space (1957), first man in space (1961), first woman in space (1963), first spacewalk (1965), first space station (1971) Seven successful space stations (Salyut 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and Mir) before partnering in International Space Station (ISS) No people beyond low Earth orbit (LEO), however For earth orbit, continues to rely on Soyuz, first launched in 1967, but upgraded many times and is key to ISS operations Designed space shuttle, Buran, but launched only once in automated mode (no crew) in 1988 06-01-2011 2 Russia (2) Existing reliable launch vehicles Proton is largest: 21 tons to LEO; 5.5 tons to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) Attempts to build Saturn V-equivalent in 1960s and 1970s failed (N1 failed four times in four attempts 1969-1972) Energiya booster in 1980s only flew twice (1987 with Polyus and 1988 with Buran). Abandoned for financial reasons. Was 100 tons to LEO; 18-20 tons to GTO; 32 tons to lunar trajectory. RD-170 engines for Energiya’s strap-ons live on today in other forms for Zenit, Atlas V, and Angara (under development) 06-01-2011 3 Russia (3) Robotic planetary space exploration mixed Excellent success at – Moon (Luna and Lunokhod series, plus Zond circumlunar flights) Venus (Venera series) Halley’s Comet (Vega 1 and 2—also Venus) Jinxed at Mars More than a dozen failures in 1960s - 1970s Partial success with Phobos 2 in 1988 (Phobos 1 failed) Mars 96 failed to leave Earth orbit Phobos-Grunt scheduled for later this year; designed as sample return from Phobos (includes Chinese orbiter) 06-01-2011 4 Russia (4) Grand statements over decades about sending people to the Moon and Mars, but never enough money to proceed.
    [Show full text]
  • G20 Voices on the Future of the Space Economy Space20 Space Economy Leaders Meeting 7 October 2020, Saudi Arabia
    G20 Voices on the Future of the Space Economy Space20 Space Economy Leaders Meeting 7 October 2020, Saudi Arabia KPMG.com 2 G20 Voices on the Future of the Space Economy Contents 3 Space20 5 Foreword 7 Key themes from the Space20 meeting 10 G20 heads of space agencies summary 23 Recommendations 24 Contacts ©2020 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved. 3 G20 Voices on the Future of the Space Economy Space20 The G20 Secretariat realized how space can be part of developing new frontiers and maintaining a peaceful environment on earth and understands the role of new space activities in the broader economy. Therefore, for the first time in G20 history, space has been selected as one of the 22 priorities of the G20 2020 agenda, titled “Promoting Space Cooperation” under the goal “Shaping New Frontiers.” ©2020 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved. 4 G20 Voices on the Future of the Space Economy The first Space Economy Leaders Meeting – Space20 was held virtually on 7 October 2020. It was a high-profile meeting, organized by the Saudi Space Commission (SSC) and the G20 Saudi Secretariat as part of the International Conferences Program. The meeting was initiated to increase awareness of the space economy, shape new frontiers in the global economy, and to contribute to the international efforts on the peaceful uses of space while maximizing its economic benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Annu Al R Ep Or T 2016–2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016–2017 ANNUAL Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research Studies and Investigations GESTAR Staff Hanson, Heather Miller, Kevin Wen, Guoyong Achuthavarier, Deepthi Holdaway, Dan Mohammed, Priscilla Wiessinger, Scott Ahamed, Aakash Humberson, Winnie Monroe, Brian Wright, Ernie Amatya, Pukar Hurwitz, Margaret Moran, Amy Yang, Weidong Andrew, Andrea Ibrahim, Amir Ng, Joy Yang, Yuekui Anyamba, Assaf Jackson, Katrina Norris, Peter Yao, Tian Aquila, Valentina Jentoft-Nilsen, Marit Nowottnick, Ed Zhang, Cheng Armstrong, Amanda Jepsen, Rikke Oda, Tom Zhang, Qingyuan Arnold, Nathan Jethva, Hiren Olsen, Mark Zhou, Yaping Barker, Ryan Jin, Daeho Orbe, Clara Ziemke, Jerald Beck, Jefferson Jin, Jianjun Patadia, Falguni Bell, Benita Ju, Junchang Patel, Kiran GESTAR Integrated Belvedere, Debbie Keating, Shane Paynter, Ian Project Team (IPT) Bensusen, Sally Kekesi, Alex Pelc, Joanna Ball, Carol Bollian, Tobias Keller, Christoph Peng, Jinzheng Corso, Bill Bridgman, Tom Khan, Maudood Poje, Lisa Espiritu, Angie Brucker, Ludovic Kim, Dongchul Potter, Gerald Gardner, Jeanette Buchard, Virginie Kim, Dongjae Prescott, Ishon Houghton, Amy Carvalho, David Kim, Hyokyung Prive, Nikki Morgan, Dagmar Radcliff, Matthew Samuel, Elamae ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Castellanos, Patricia Kim, Min-Jeong Cede, Alexander Knowland, Emma Reale, Oreste Celarier, Ed Kolassa, Jana Rousseaux, Cecile Technical Editor Cetinic, Ivona Korkin, Sergey Sayer, Andy Amy Houghton Chang, Yehui Kostis, Helen-Nicole Schiffer, Robert Chatterjee, Abhishek Kowalewski, Matthew Schindler,
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Japan an Assessment of Japan´S Strategy for Space
    Full Report Securing Japan An assessment of Japan´s strategy for space Report: Title: “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report” Published: July 2020 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print) • 2076-6688 (online) Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria Phone: +43 1 718 11 18 -0 E-Mail: [email protected] Website: www.espi.or.at Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “ESPI Report 74 - Securing Japan - Full Report, July 2020. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: copylot.at Cover page picture credit: European Space Agency (ESA) TABLE OF CONTENT 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background and rationales ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Study ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Methodology
    [Show full text]