DOCSLIB.ORG

Unconvinced About Jesus: a Venue for Seekers and Skeptics Exploring the Life and Teachings of Jesus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unconvinced About Jesus: a Venue for Seekers and Skeptics Exploring the Life and Teachings of Jesus Unconvinced about Jesus: a venue for seekers and skeptics exploring the life and teachings of Jesus. Format: 1. Launch Pad – a ten minute table conversation to warm up to the topic. 2. Explore – a firsthand look at a Gospel text with the help of an unformatted manuscript. 3. Question/Answer- the heartbeat of UNCONVINCED is open-ended inquiry into the life and teachings of Jesus… or anything the class is curious about. Bring your questions! 4. Sign Off –What are your doubts about Jesus? To you is Jesus believable or unconvincing? Launch Pad: discuss the following at your table. Trust for institutions such as the Church or government has always been a point of struggle for people. What kinds of things break your trust in politicians or church leaders? Why is it difficult to trust powerful people or institutions? Introduction: Being unconvinced is a two way street. When Jesus began his ministry he introduced the arrival of the Kingdom of God! Quite a statement of power! How could Jesus validate a claim like that? This chapter of Unconvinced considers the options Jesus had at his disposal to build the base of popular credibility for his ministry. Who would he turn to in order to validate his claims? Which groups would be convinced of his vision for the Kingdom of God? Jesus was utterly unconvincing to every group, every faction and every political player of his day. And the feeling was certainly mutual on Jesus’ part! Jesus and Power – Did Jesus want the help of groups that had power? 23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Feast, many believed in his name when they saw the signs that he was doing. 24 But Jesus on his part did not entrust himself to them, because he knew all people 25 and needed no one to bear witness about man, for he himself knew what was in man. (John 2:23-25 ESV) 13 So they gathered them up and filled twelve baskets with fragments from the five barley loaves left by those who had eaten. 14 When the people saw the sign that he had done, they said, "This is indeed the Prophet who is to come into the world!" 15 Perceiving then that they were about to come and take him by force to make him king, Jesus withdrew again to the mountain by himself. (John 6:13-15 ESV) One day as Jesus was teaching the people in the temple courts and proclaiming the good news, the chief priests and the teachers of the law, together with the elders, came up to him. 2 "Tell us by what authority you are doing these things," they said. "Who gave you this authority?" 3 He replied, "I will also ask you a question. Tell me: 4 John's baptism-- was it from heaven, or of human origin?" 5 They discussed it among themselves and said, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will ask, 'Why didn't you believe him?' 6 But if we say, 'Of human origin,' all the people will stone us, because they are persuaded that John was a prophet." 7 So they answered, "We don't know where it was from." 8 Jesus said, "Neither will I tell you by what authority I am doing these things." (Luk 20:1-8 NIV) 20 Keeping a close watch on him, they sent spies, who pretended to be sincere. They hoped to catch Jesus in something he said, so that they might hand him over to the power and authority of the governor. 21 So the spies questioned him: "Teacher, we know that you speak and teach what is right, and that you do not show partiality but teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. 22 Is it right for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not? 23 He saw through their duplicity and said to them, 24 "Show me a denarius. Whose image and inscription are on it?" "Caesar's," they replied. 25 He said to them, "Then give back to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." 26 They were unable to trap him in what he had said there in public. And astonished by his answer, they became silent. (Luk 20:20-26 NIV) Groups and people who may have wanted to endorse Jesus (but didn’t). 1. Pharisees: Characteristic of the Pharisaic position was their adherence to a body of traditional material (Gk paradosis) handed down “from the fathers,” which defined correct behavior. Obedience to the Torah would renew God’s covenant blessings including the coming of the Messiah. Pharisees were the ultimate good guys. Pro-Yahweh. Pro-Torah. Anti-Roman Empire. 2. Sadducees: Least popular with ordinary Jews. Landed aristocrats of Jerusalem. “The most like Washington D.C. lawyers”. Refused the doctrine of the Resurrection. Realists eager to negotiate peace with Rome, against the Pharisees. Mark 12:18-27 – discussion about the woman with 7 husbands… “you are quite wrong”. Aligned politically w. Herodians. 3. Essenes: Collection of devout Jewish followers who decided to withdraw into community Khirbet Qumran was their headquarters – where the Dead Sea Scrolls later found. Leader known as The Teacher of Righteousness. Held that the Temple and the priesthood were corrupt. Waited for God’s holy wrath (not blessing) to come down (reminds you of Jonah) God would bring his kingdom on earth in wrath in response to utter failure of Israel to live up to its mission. Part Torah observance, part military holy warfare. 4. Zealots in the Maccabean tradition: 1&2 Maccabees – deuterocanonical writings from intertestamental period. Mattathias of Modein and his sons Judah the Hammer, Simon and Jonathan Maccabeus. Maccabean revolt against Syrian overlords in 167-164 BC. Fought to regain control of the Temple – celebration of Hanukkah commemorates this. Use of bloodshed and violence to recapture control of the Temple. Simon the Zealot was one such Holy Warrior! And was one of Jesus’ 12 Disciples. Pilate was initially afraid that Jesus was a Zealot. 5. Herod Antipas (4 BC to 39 AD) and the Herodians: tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, answered strictly to Rome, under Pilate’s jurisdiction. He is most known for his beheading of John the Baptist (Mark 6:17–29; Luke 3:19–20). When Herod heard of Jesus he thought he was JB raised from the dead! Pilate sent Jesus to Herod during his trial, but was not legally obligated to do so. He wanted to extricate himself from an awkward situation in which the Jews wanted to crucify Jesus (Pilate felt that he was innocent). The Herodians were influential partisans of the Herodian dynasty. The Herodians and the Pharisees sought to destroy Jesus (Mk 3:6). And to incriminate him regarding the lawfulness of paying taxes to Caesar (Mt 22:16 par. Mk 12:13). 6. Pilate: Appointed by Tiberius the Emperor in AD 26. In charge of the army of occupation stationed in Caesarea. Full judicial authority of Capital Punishment (over the Sanhedrin). He appointed the high priests and controlled the Temple treasury. Pilate authorized the death of Jesus (Tacitus, Annals 15. 44). The verdict of the NT is that he was a weak man, ready to serve expediency rather than principle. The judicial murder of the Saviour was due less to a desire to please the Jewish authorities than to fear of imperial displeasure if Tiberius heard of further unrest in Judaea. Question/Answer - What questions do you have about Jesus from today’s discussion? ñ What do you think belief in Jesus is about at its core? ñ Do you think the fact that Jesus never sought political or religious endorsements adds to or takes away from his credibility as a leader? ñ Does Jesus’ use of power and authority fit with his claim to be the Son of God/ the Messiah? Summary 1. Jesus did not need _________________________ authority to accomplish his mission. 2. Groups and individuals in Jesus day were operating from a vastly different vision of the ______________________ of ____________ than Jesus. 3. Being convinced of Jesus is only half the matter. Jesus had to also be convinced of the ___________________ and ________________________ of people before he entrusted himself to them. The same is true today! Sign Off ñ Would Jesus be a convincing leader if he had to operate in today’s religious and political climate? ñ What would make you trust or mistrust a spiritual leader like Jesus? ñ In your opinion, do groups or Churches that try to use Jesus for their advantage damage the credibility of Christianity beyond repair? ñ What would you like to see the Church do to rebuild credibility today? After today’s discussion, where would you place yourself on a chart like the one below? Answer Key for Summary section above: Summary 1. Jesus did not need _________________________ authority to accomplish his mission. 2. Groups and individuals in Jesus day were operating from a vastly different vision of the ______________________ of ____________ than Jesus. 3. Being convinced of Jesus is only half the matter. Jesus had to also be convinced of the ___________________ and ________________________ of people before he entrusted himself to them. The same is true today! Study Notes Pilate and the Roman Empire ñ Appointed by Tiberius the Emperor in AD 26 ñ 5th Praefectus of Judaea ñ In charge of the army of occupation stationed in Caesarea ñ Local fortress in Jerusalem (Antonia) ñ Full judicial authority of Capital Punishment (over the Sanhedrin) ñ He appointed the high priests and controlled the Temple treasury ñ Pilate authorized the death of Jesus (Tacitus, Annals 15.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy FREE DOWNLOAD VERSION
    DOWNLOAD SAMPLE CHAPTERS 1 & 2 ONLY CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 PAUL & THE PHARISEE CONSPIRACY AGAINST JESUS CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy Against Jesus by Syed M. S. Nasser CHRISTIANITY & ST PAUL: THE ANTICHRIST PART 1 Paul & the Pharisee Conspiracy Against Jesus By Syed M. S. Nasser Copyright © 2016 Syed M. S. Nasser All Rights Reserved ISBN 978-1-5272-0531-4 All rights reserved. This book was published by Utopia International Ltd. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles, reviews or for educational purposes. This includes reprints, excerpts, photocopying, recording, or any future means of reproduction. Published in the United Kingdom by Utopia International Ltd www.jesusorpaul.com @SyedMSNasser #PhariseeConspiracy www.facebook.com/SyedMSNasser [email protected] To join the conversation, use the hash-tag #PhariseeConspiracy or visit www.jesusorpaul.com to join Syed Nasser’s mailing list Front image is by Nicolas-Bernard Lepicie in 1767 of Paul’s conversion on the Road to Damascus (public domain). THIS SERIES While this book is primarily about the why of Paul’s corruptions, later books address the how, as well as examining the corruptions wrought in the Old Testament. Divine providence ensured that the footsteps of these historical actors survived, such that a seeker of truth can discern how history always played out as God foretold. Thus, history marches on and our task is to show in broad terms how this happened, and how it will play out in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam L. Porter
    January 2014 Adam L. Porter Department of Religion 1120 West Lafayette Avenue Illinois College Jacksonville, IL 62650 1101 West College Avenue 269-767-8373 Jacksonville, IL 62650 [email protected] Voice: 919-245-3429 www2.ic.edu/aporter Fax: 919-245-3480 Education: Ph.D., Religious Studies, Duke University May 1999 Major Field: Judaic Studies Minor Fields: Old Testament, Art and Art History Master of Theological Studies, Harvard Divinity School May 1993 Concentration in Western Traditions Bachelor of Arts, Oberlin College May 1988 Major: Economics, Minor: Religion Dean of the Faculty, July 2014 - present Overseeing search and hiring of faculty Assessing faculty performance Associate Academic Dean, July 2013-June, 2014. Leading the team writing Illinois College’s HLC re-accreditation assurance argument Overseeing search and hiring of non-tenure track faculty, as well as meeting with them to discuss their performance Coordinate efforts to improve student retention, serve on college’s Early Intervention Group, student academic advising and progress monitoring Coordinate selecting and brining major speakers to campus as part of Convocation program Special projects and troubleshooting as assigned by the Dean of the College Teaching Experience: Professor, Illinois College, fall 2012-present Associate Professor, Illinois College, fall 2006-spring 2012 Assistant Professor, Illinois College, fall 2000-spring 2006 Courses Taught Abrahamic Religions (fall 2002, 2003, spring 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013) Ancient Near Eastern Religions (fall 2003, 2005) Art and Archaeology of the Ancient Mediterranean (spring 2003, fall 2004, 2006) Biblical Greek (AY 2004-05, AY 2008-09, AY 2010-11, spring 2012, fall 2012, spring 2013) BreakAway: Ancient Greece (spring 2008, 2010) BreakAway: Jews, Christians, and Muslims in Medieval Spain (spring 2003) BreakAway: Italy (May 2012) BreakAway: London (May 2013) BreakAway: Morocco (January 2008) BreakAway: Peru, Past and Present - Inca Trail (Spring 2009) Curriculum Vitæ A.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy Week Handout
    Holy Week Study and Traditions Palm Sunday — Triumphal Entry After spending the Sabbath in Bethany with Mary, Martha, and Lazarus, Jesus journeyed up the hill to Bethphage where His disciples obtained a donkey, so He could enter Jerusalem “riding upon an ass” - fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophecy and indication that He would come in peace. Believers spread their garments before him and waved palm branches, shouting “Hosanna to the Son of David, Hosanna in the highest.” * Read Matthew 21: 1-11 and Luke 19: 35-38 * Watch the Triumphal Entry lds.org/bible-videos * Create an Easter Tree — Cut some branches to bloom inside, put them in a large vase and decorate your Easter Tree with ribbons, egg ornaments (most craft stores have some before spring) and small images of the Savior’s life. You can find lots of art images on the web to print and cut at home. Monday — Second Cleansing of the Temple This was three years from the first cleansing when Jesus referred to the temple as “My Father’s house.” The last week of His life, He described the temple as, “My house.” Then He healed the blind and lame, and blighted the fig tree - symbolic of Christ’s detest for hypocrisy and proof that He had power over life and death. Then He returned to Bethany. * Read Matthew 21: 12-16, Mark 11:17, and Matthew 21: 17-22 * Watch Cleansing of the Temple * Easter Walk — Go on a nature treasure hunt for items that represent parts of the Easter story. Read or talk about the Easter story and find the following: - Something thorny or sharp to represent the crown of thorns
    [Show full text]
  • H.B. Hackett, "Alleged Anachronism in Acts 5: 36
    1848.] Litlny. From Ba'albek to the sea its direct course is nearest 55 geographical miles. It flows at first along the alluvial valley; then breaks through the southern I!purs of Lebanon by a de~p chasm for about 20 miles, much of the way over a rocky bed and with a rushing and foaming stream; and at last flows to the sea with many windings through a broad low tract of meadow land. If now for this 20 milea mcham, we assume an average fall in the mile of 100 feet, or'20oo feet in all, (which Is a very large allowance, greater indeed than the rate of descent at the Little Falls of the Mohawk,) there yet remain. of the elevation Ilt Ba'albek (8;29 English feet) no less than 1729 feet to be distributed along the rest of the course, or 85 geographical miles. This gives an average fall of very nearly 50 feet in a mile, in a course mostly along alluvial vallies. This result, therefore, goet strongly to confirm that found above in the case of the Orontes; and both together would seem to afford decisive proof, that the reported elevation of the BIlU'a must be greatly exaggerated. Let us hope that public attention may be called to the varioaa points referred to in Ihis paper; and that those who have it in their power, will speedily cause these questions to be put at rest forever. ARTICLE II. ALLEGED ANACHRONISM IN ACTS 5: 36 IN RELATION TO Tmt SEDITION OF THEUDAS. TraDlialad fi'om the German loy H.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Perspective on Paul: Its Basic Tenets, History, and Presuppositions
    TMSJ 16/2 (Fall 2005) 189-243 THE NEW PERSPECTIVE ON PAUL: ITS BASIC TENETS, HISTORY, AND PRESUPPOSITIONS F. David Farnell Associate Professor of New Testament Recent decades have witnessed a change in views of Pauline theology. A growing number of evangelicals have endorsed a view called the New Perspective on Paul (NPP) which significantly departs from the Reformation emphasis on justification by faith alone. The NPP has followed in the path of historical criticism’s rejection of an orthodox view of biblical inspiration, and has adopted an existential view of biblical interpretation. The best-known spokesmen for the NPP are E. P. Sanders, James D. G. Dunn, and N. T. Wright. With only slight differences in their defenses of the NPP, all three have adopted “covenantal nomism,” which essentially gives a role in salvation to works of the law of Moses. A survey of historical elements leading up to the NPP isolates several influences: Jewish opposition to the Jesus of the Gospels and Pauline literature, Luther’s alleged antisemitism, and historical-criticism. The NPP is not actually new; it is simply a simultaneous convergence of a number of old aberrations in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. * * * * * When discussing the rise of the New Perspective on Paul (NPP), few theologians carefully scrutinize its historical and presuppositional antecedents. Many treat it merely as a 20th-century phenomenon; something that is relatively “new” arising within the last thirty or forty years. They erroneously isolate it from its long history of development. The NPP, however, is not new but is the revival of an old ideology that has been around for the many centuries of church history: the revival of works as efficacious for salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus Writings Outline
    THE WARS OF THE JEWS OR THE HISTORY OF THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM – BOOK I CONTAINING FROM THE TAKING OF JERUSALEM BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES TO THE DEATH OF HEROD THE GREAT. (THE INTERVAL OF 177 YEARS) CHAPTER 1: HOW THE CITY JERUSALEM WAS TAKEN, AND THE TEMPLE PILLAGED [BY ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES]; AS ALSO CONCERNING THE ACTIONS OF THE MACCABEES, MATTHIAS AND JUDAS; AND CONCERNING THE DEATH OF JUDAS. CHAPTER 2: CONCERNING THE SUCCESSORS OF JUDAS; WHO WERE JONATHAN AND SIMON, AND JOHN HYRCANUS? CHAPTER 3: HOW ARISTOBULUS WAS THE FIRST THAT PUT A DIADEM ABOUT HIS HEAD; AND AFTER HE HAD PUT HIS MOTHER AND BROTHER TO DEATH, DIED HIMSELF, WHEN HE HAD REIGNED NO MORE THAN A YEAR. CHAPTER 4: WHAT ACTIONS WERE DONE BY ALEXANDER JANNEUS, WHO REIGNED TWENTY- SEVEN YEARS. CHAPTER 5: ALEXANDRA REIGNS NINE YEARS, DURING WHICH TIME THE PHARISEES WERE THE REAL RULERS OF THE NATION. CHAPTER 6: WHEN HYRCANUS WHO WAS ALEXANDER'S HEIR, RECEDED FROM HIS CLAIM TO THE CROWN ARISTOBULUS IS MADE KING; AND AFTERWARD THE SAME HYRCANUS BY THE MEANS OF ANTIPATER; IS BROUGHT BACK BY ABETAS. AT LAST POMPEY IS MADE THE ARBITRATOR OF THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE BROTHERS. CHAPTER 7: HOW POMPEY HAD THE CITY OF JERUSALEM DELIVERED UP TO HIM BUT TOOK THE TEMPLE BY FORCE. HOW HE WENT INTO THE HOLY OF HOLIES; AS ALSO WHAT WERE HIS OTHER EXPLOITS IN JUDEA. CHAPTER 8: ALEXANDER, THE SON OF ARISTOBULUS, WHO RAN AWAY FROM POMPEY, MAKES AN EXPEDITION AGAINST HYRCANUS; BUT BEING OVERCOME BY GABINIUS HE DELIVERS UP THE FORTRESSES TO HIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Passage 1Now About That Time Herod the King Stretched out His Hand to Harass Some from the Church
    Read the Passage 1Now about that time Herod the king stretched out his hand to harass some from the church. 2Then he killed James the brother of John with the sword. 3And because he saw that it pleased the Jews, he proceeded further to seize Peter also. Now it was during the Days of Unleavened Bread. So when he had arrested him, he put him in prison, and delivered him to four squads of soldiers to keep him, intending to bring him before the people after Passover. 5Peter was therefore kept in prison, but constant prayer was offered to God for him by the church. 6And when Herod was about to bring him out, that night Peter was sleeping, bound with two chains between two soldiers; and the guards before the door were keeping the prison. 7Now behold, an angel of the Lord stood by him, and a light shone in the prison; and he struck Peter on the side and raised him up, saying, “Arise quickly!” And his chains fell off his hands. 8Then the angel said to him, “Gird yourself and tie on your sandals”; and so he did. And he said to him, “Put on your garment and follow me.” 9So he went out and followed him, and did not know that what was done by the angel was real, but thought he was seeing a vision. 10When they were past the first and the second guard posts, they came to the iron gate that leads to the city, which opened to them of its own accord; and they went out and went down one street, and immediately the angel departed from him.
    [Show full text]
  • Acts 5 Commentary
    CCBC Prayer Group Dr. Brendon Witte Acts 5:17-42 Commentary “But the high priest rose up, and all who were with him (that is, the party of the Sadducees), and filled with jealousy they arrested the apostles and put them in the public prison” (vv. 17-18). At the instigation of the presiding member over the Sanhedrin, Annas the high priest (Acts 4:6), the party of the Sadducees arrested the apostles and placed them in prison overnight. The reason for their jealousy is not explained in the text. Perhaps, the Sadducees did not like the way the people treated the apostles with greater respect, even to the point that the crowds were potentially willing to stone some of the Sadducees to rescue the apostles (Acts 5:26). Additionally, they may have been envious of the disciples’ perceived authority; the Sadducees may have feared that power was slipping from their grasp as the disciples led Jews and God-fearers toward Christ and away from the Temple. The Tabernacle, and later the Temple, of God were places of physical and spiritual healing for the Israelites. Peter in the immediately preceding passage (Acts 5:12-16) stood in the Temple precincts and offered both types of restoration apart from the Temple and her priests. This clear display of authority undermined the dominance of the priestly class and the Sadducean party to which many of the aristocratic priests belonged. Neither of these suggestions are mutually exclusive. Either or neither may be correct. The reader simply has not been told the reason for the Sadducees envy; one is left merely to speculate a reason or reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time – October 18, 2020
    Twenty-ninth Sunday in Ordinary Time – October 18, 2020 Tje Nativity welcomes Father In today’s Gospel Jesus and the religious leaders in Leonardo J. Gajardo, of Cross Jerusalem continue their tense exchange of Catholic Outreach, who is questions and challenges. At this point the disciples speaking this weekend at all of the Pharisees, together with the Herodians, try to entrap Jesus by their question about the payment of Masses on behalf of the poor in taxes. Matthew sets up an unusual partnership developing countries. Cross between the Pharisees and the Herodians. The Catholic Outreach was founded Herodians were supporters of Herod Antipas, a to create a meaningful link Jewish political leader who collaborated with the between parishes in America and Romans. Such collaboration would have required a the priest and nuns working in the compromised observance of the Mosaic Law. The Church overseas in the Caribbean, Africa, Asia, Central Pharisees, on the other hand, taught scrupulous and South America. observance of the Mosaic Law and opposed Roman occupation. Herodians favored the payment of taxes; the Pharisees opposed it. The Herodians and Father Leonardo J. Gajardo is a member of the U.S. Province of the Priests of the Society of St. Sulpice and the Pharisees approach Jesus, asking that he take sides in their dispute. If Jesus answers with the a priest of the Diocese of Gary, IN. He was ordained in Pharisees,firstF he shows himself to be an enemy of 2006 and is an alumnus of Theological College, the Rome. If he answers with the Herodians, he offends national seminary of The Catholic University of popular Jewish religious sensibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons CUREJ - College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal College of Arts and Sciences 5-2011 ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Emerson T. Brooking University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/curej Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, Military History Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Brooking, Emerson T., "ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72" 01 May 2011. CUREJ: College Undergraduate Research Electronic Journal, University of Pennsylvania, https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/curej/145 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROMA SURRECTA: Portrait of a Counterinsurgent Power, 216 BC - AD 72 Abstract This study evaluates the military history and practice of the Roman Empire in the context of contemporary counterinsurgency theory. It purports that the majority of Rome’s security challenges fulfill the criteria of insurgency, and that Rome’s responses demonstrate counterinsurgency proficiency. These assertions are proven by means of an extensive investigation of the grand strategic, military, and cultural aspects of the Roman state. Fourteen instances of likely insurgency are identified and examined, permitting the application of broad theoretical precepts
    [Show full text]
  • Svensk Exegetisk 81 Årsbok
    SVENSK EXEGETISK 81 ÅRSBOK På uppdrag av Svenska exegetiska sällskapet utgiven av Göran Eidevall Uppsala 2016 Svenska exegetiska sällskapet c/o Teologiska institutionen Box 511, S-751 20 UPPSALA, Sverige www.exegetiskasallskapet.se Utgivare: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Redaktionssekreterare: Tobias Hägerland –2016 ([email protected]) David Willgren 2017– ([email protected]) Recensionsansvarig: Rosmari Lillas-Schuil ([email protected]) Redaktionskommitté: Göran Eidevall ([email protected]) Rikard Roitto ([email protected]) Blaåenka Scheuer ([email protected]) Cecilia Wassén ([email protected]) Prenumerationspriser: Sverige: SEK 200 (studenter SEK 100) Övriga världen: SEK 300 Frakt tillkommer med SEK 50. För medlemmar i SES är frakten kostnadsfri. SEÅ beställs hos Svenska exegetiska sällskapet via hemsidan eller postadress ovan, eller hos Bokrondellen (www.bokrondellen.se). Anvisningar för medverkande åter- finns på hemsidan eller erhålls från redaktionssekreteraren. Manusstopp är 1 mars. Tidskriften är indexerad i Libris databas (www.kb.se/libris/). SEÅ may be ordered from Svenska exegetiska sällskapet either through the homepage or at the postal address above. Instructions for contributors are found on the homep- age or may be requested from the editorial secretary (david.willgren@ altutbildning.se). This periodical is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database®, published by the Ameri- can Theological Library Association, 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606; E-mail: [email protected]; WWW: https://www.atla.com/. Omslagsbild: Odysseus och sirenerna (attisk vas, ca 480–470 f.Kr., British Museum) Bildbearbetning: Marcus Lecaros © SEÅ och respektive författare ISSN 1100-2298 Uppsala 2016 Tryck: Bulls Graphics, Halmstad Innehåll Exegetiska dagen 2015/Exegetical Day 2015 Bruce Louden Agamemnon and the Hebrew Bible ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Ijrr14001.Pdf
    ISSN 1556-3723 (print) Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion __________________________________________________________________ Volume 14 2018 Article 1 __________________________________________________________________ The Structure of Jesus’s Social Network: Subgroups, Blockmodeling, and Balance Jennifer M. McClure* Samford University Birmingham, Alabama * [email protected] Copyright © 2018 Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion is freely available on the World Wide Web at http://www.religjournal.com. The Structure of Jesus’s Social Network: Subgroups, Blockmodeling, and Balance Jennifer M. McClure Samford University Birmingham, Alabama Abstract Building on a recent article that introduced Jesus’s social network, this study uses social network analysis to examine the structure of Jesus’s social network in more depth. The analyses investigate the interpersonal connections recorded in the four Gospels of the New Testament, and they focus on three main categories of actors with whom Jesus had ties: his family and followers, the civil and religious authorities, and stigmatized people. This study utilizes three analytical techniques to describe the structure of Jesus’s social network: (1) subgroup analysis
    [Show full text]