Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Introduction Yuk Hui and Andreas Broeckmann The Postmodern in Les Immatériaux In1985,theFrenchphilosopherJean-FrançoisLyotard,togetherwiththe designtheoristThierryChaput,curatedtheexhibitionLes Immatériaux at theCentreGeorgesPompidouinParis.Hehadacceptedaninvitationbythe Minister for CultureandtheCenter for Industrial Creation (CCI).Sixyearsafter Lyotard’sreportonThe Postmodern Condition (1979),1theexhibitiondem- onstratedthehypothesiswhichhehaddescribedinthereport.Theobjects andartworksshownexpressedhisobservationsofwhatwashappeningin domainssuchasart,scienceandphilosophy,underthenewconditionofcom- municationtechnologies.Lyotard’sreportisconsideredtobearesponseto anotherreportbySimonNoraandAlainMinc,inthe1970s,whichproposed the “computerisation of society”2.NoraandMinc’sprojectleadtothedevel- opmentoftheFrenchMinitelsystem.AccordingtoLyotard,thenew“post- modern”conditiondemandedanewsensibility,ashestatedintheprinciple propositionfortheexhibition:“Theinsecurity,thelossofidentity,thecrisis isnotexpressedonlyineconomyandthesocial,butalsointhedomainsof thesensibility,oftheknowledgeandthepowerofman(futility,life,death), themodesoflife(inrelationtowork,tohabits,tofood,…etc.).”3Aconstant returntothepostmodernconditionbecameageneralmethodofLyotard’s philosophicalthinkingtogobeyondthemodernimagination,andguidedthe constructionoftheexhibitionwhichwas,inhisownwords,a“manifestation”, a“non-exhibition”. 1 Jean-FrançoisLyotard,La Condition postmoderne(Paris:ÉditionsdeMinuit,1979). 2 CharlieGere,Art, Time and Technology(Oxford:Berg,2006),p.139. 3 Les Immatériaux catalogue, Album (Paris:CentrePompidou,1985),p.26. 10 30 Years after Les Immatériaux ThetitleoftheexhibitionLes Immatériauxdemonstratesaformofresistance againstthemodernconceptionofmateriality.Theoriginaltitlefortheproject thattheCCIhadinitiatedalreadyin1981,beforeLyotardgotinvolvedin1983, was Création et matériaux nouveaux.Thistitlewaschangedseveraltimes: Matériau et création,Matériaux nouveaux et création,La Matière dans tous ses états,beforeitwasfinallyannouncedtothepublicasLes Immatériaux.4 The etymological root mâtreferstomakingbyhand,tomeasure,toconstruct. ThemodernssinceDescartesconceiveadualismandhenceanopposition between the res cogitansandtheres extensa;thethinkingmindbecomesthe foundationofknowledgeandalsothejudgeofwhatisreal.AsLyotardwrote: “Inthetraditionofmodernity,therelationofthehumanwithmaterialsisfixed bytheCartesianprogramme:tobecomemasterandpossessorofnature.A freewillimposesitsendstothegivensensedatatodivertthemawayfrom theirnaturalsense.Itwilldeterminetheirendwiththehelpoflanguagewhich allowsittoarticulatewhatispossible(aproject)andtoimposeituponwhatis real(matter).”5 HenceLyotardconsideredthatatitlesuchasmatériaux nouveaux would onlyperpetuatethemodernconception,whileusingtheprefixim-could introduceamomentofself-reflection:“Theexhibition[manifestation]entitled Les Immatériauxhasthepurposeofpresenting[faire sentir] how much this relationisalteredbythefactofnewmaterials.Inthisextendedsense,thenew materialsarenotonlynewmaterials,theyinterrogateanideaofthehuman whoworks,whoprojects,whoremembers:ofanauthor.”6 The immaterial is fundamentallymaterial.Thepointwasnottoappreciatethenewmateriality broughtbythetelecommunicationtechnologies,butrathertoquestionthe relationbetweenmanandhisdesiretobecomethemasterofmatter.The aimofcallingit“immaterial”,likethedesignationofthe“postmodern”,was toliberatemanfromthemodernparadigm,andtoreleasematerialfromthe prisonoftheindustrialrevolution. Atthetime,LyotardhadjustfinishedwritingLe Differénd,abookdedicated tothephilosophyofKantandWittgenstein,inwhichLyotardwantedto re-readthehistoryofphilosophyaccordingtowhatwascalledthelinguistic turn.7 The differendreferstoanunresolvedconflictduetothelackofrulesor metanarrativeswhicharecommontotwodifferentsystemsofdiscourse.We shouldalsorecognisethatlanguagewasalwaysatthecentreofhisthoughts, aswasalreadyevidentsincehisPhDthesis,whichwaslaterpublishedas 4 AntonyHudek,“FromOver-toSub-Exposure:TheAnamnesisofLes Immatériaux”,inthis volume,p.72. 5 Les Immatériaux catalogue, Album(Paris:CentrePompidou,1985),p.16. 6 Ibid. 7 Jean-FrançoisLyotard, Le Différend(Paris:Minuit,1983). Introduction 11 matière [referent] référent [referent] destinateur destinataire [sender] [receiver] maternité message matériel [maternity] [message] [hardware] matériau [support] code [code] matrice [matrix] [Figure1]Communicationdiagram(Source:Petit Journal,28March–15July1985,Paris,p.2. CentrePompidou,MNAM,BibliothèqueKandinsky). Discours, Figure(1971).8Thequestionoflanguagewashencefundamental toLyotard’sconceptualisationofthisexhibition,especiallysincetelecom- municationtechnologyhadcreatedanewmaterialityoflanguagebetween sendersandreceivers;ormorefundamentally,itservedasthebasisofthe postmodernturn.Theconceptionoflanguageasatoolalsocharacterises modernity,because“modernitypresupposesthateverythingspeaks,this meansthatsolongaswecanconnecttoit,captureit,translateitandinter- pretit,thereisnofundamentaldifferencebetweendataandaphrase;there isnofundamentaldifferencebetweenaphenomenonofdisplacementinan electromagneticspectrumandalogicalproposition”.9Butitisalsosuchan equivalencethatallowsLyotardtodevelopanontologyofthematerialor immaterialaccordingtoamodeloftelecommunication:matériau/medium, matériel/receiver(destinataire),maternité/emitter(destinateur),matière/ referent,andmatrice/code[Figure1].Thenewmaterialitywasmappedonto themodeloftelecommunication.Theobjectsandartworksintheexhibition, aswellasthe60sitesatwhichtheywerepresented,werealsoclassifiedand orderedaccordingtothesefivecategories. Art and Science in Question Lyotardcomparedthedisplacementoftheelectromagneticspectrumandlog- icalpropositions,andcontinued:“giventhisfact,inthisface-to-facerelation toauniversethatishistodominate–aheroicrelation,Iwouldsay–inorder tomakehimselfthemasterofit,manmustbecomesomethingelseentirely: thehumansubjectbecomesnolongerasubjectbut,Iwouldsay,onecase amongothers,albeitacasewhichretainsthisprivilege,untilprovenotherwise 8 Jean-FrançoisLyotard,Discours, Figure(Paris:Klincksieck,1971),translatedintoEnglishby AntonyHudekandMaryLydon,MinneapolisMN:UniversityofMinnesotaPress,2011). 9 FromLyotard’sreport,“Aprèssixmoisdetravail”;seethisvolume,p.33. 12 30 Years after Les Immatériaux (whichisextremelyimprobable)”.10 It was clear to the curatorial team that technologywasnotthecauseofarupture,butratherthesignofthedecline ofthefigureofthemodern,andthatatthesametimetechnologymade thismodernprojectreflectuponitself,anddestabiliseitself.11InLyotard’s words,technologyplaceshumanityonceagaininaconditionofchildhood, ofimmaturity.ThisreferencetoimmaturityisindirectcontrasttowhatKant definedastheprojectoftheEnlightenment,namelytoovercomethecon- ditionofUnmündigkeit. Unmündigkeit,however,isnotopposedtomaturity;ratheritisopposed toauthority,ormoreprecisely,totheauthoritythatlegislatesasthesole voice.Scientificknowledgehasbeensuchanauthority,whichnotonly demythologisestheuniverse,butalsohasademoralisingimpactuponwhat Lyotardcallstheproblemoflegitimation.12Thepostmodernalsoquestions acertainhegemonyofauthorityandhenceradicallyopensupthewaythat knowledgeisacquiredandnarrated.Thearrivalofthepostmoderndemands asensitivitytothematerialconditions,atthesametimeasitgivesusa newsensibilityofliving.Inthe1980sand‘90s,wesawthecelebrationofthe postmodern,asaliberationfromtheshacklesofrules,codes,oppositions, andespeciallyofthemodern;acelebrationwhichwasevidentinalmost alldomainslistedintheexhibition:alimentation,perfume,architecture, urbanism,art,astrophysicsandphysics,biologyandgenetics,writing,habitat, mathematics,money,music,theatre,danceetc.Thesettingoftheexhibition isprobablythebestillustrationofthis.Itpresentsuswithalabyrinthinwhich everyobjectisatoncefamiliarandstrange.Envisagingtheconstructionof theexhibitionspace,LyotardproposedtogobacktoanideaofDenisDiderot who,whenreviewingthepaintingsofClaudeJosephVernetinthe1767Salon, presentedthemnotaspicturestobeviewedfollowingthetraditionallogic ofthedivisionofgalleryspace,butratherdescribedthemasrealsites,inthe formofdisorientationsofspace. Theexhibitionarosefromanefforttomovetheconceptofthepostmodern outsideofbooksandtofinditssupportinotherobjects,suchasscientific, industrialandartobjects.Thisapproachreflectedaglobalvision,without