DOCSLIB.ORG

Desarrollo El Cedro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Desarrollo El Cedro MANIFESTACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL MODALIDAD PARTICULAR PARA EFECTOS DEL PROYECTO : Desarrollo El Cedro S ECTOR C AMBIO DE U SO DE S U E L O Noviembre del 2009 MANIFESTACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL, MODALIDAD PARTICULAR para efectos del proyecto: Desarrollo El Cedro CONTENIDO I DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO, DEL PROMOVENTE Y DEL RESPONSABLE DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL............................................................................................................................................... 1 I.1 PROYECTO .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 I.1.1 Nombre del proyecto................................................................................................................................................. 1 I.1.2 Ubicación del proyecto ............................................................................................................................................. 1 I.1.3 Tiempo de vida útil del proyecto............................................................................................................................... 2 I.1.4 Presentación de la documentación legal.................................................................................................................. 2 I.2 PROMOVENTE .................................................................................................................................................................... 2 I.2.1 Nombre o razón social .............................................................................................................................................. 2 I.2.2 Registro Federal de Contribuyentes del promovente:............................................................................................. 3 I.2.3 Nombre y cargo del representante legal.................................................................................................................. 3 I.2.4 Dirección del promovente o de su representante legal para recibir o escuchar notificaciones:.......................... 3 I.3 RESPONSABLE DE LA ELABORACIÓN DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL ................................................................. 3 I.3.1 Nombre del coordinador de la elaboración del estudio.......................................................................................... 3 I.3.2 Registro Federal de Contribuyentes o CURP del coordinador de la elaboración del estudio............................. 3 I.3.3 Nombre del responsable técnico del estudio............................................................................................................ 3 I.3.4 Dirección del responsable del estudio...................................................................................................................... 3 II DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROYECTO................................................................................................................................. 4 II.1 INFORMACIÓN GENERAL DEL PROYECTO ......................................................................................................................... 4 II.1.1 Naturaleza del proyecto........................................................................................................................................... 4 II.1.2 Selección del sitio..................................................................................................................................................... 4 II.1.3 Ubicación física del proyecto y planos de localización ......................................................................................... 4 II.1.4 Inversión requerida.................................................................................................................................................. 6 II.1.5 Dimensiones del proyecto........................................................................................................................................ 6 II.1.6 Uso actual de suelo y/o cuerpos de agua en el sitio del proyecto y en sus colindancias ..................................... 8 II.1.7 Urbanización del área y descripción de servicios requeridos............................................................................... 8 II.2 CARACTERÍSTICAS PARTICULARES DEL PROYECTO ........................................................................................................ 9 II.2.1 Programa general de trabajo................................................................................................................................ 10 II.2.2 Preparación del sitio.............................................................................................................................................. 11 II.2.3 Descripción de obras y actividades provisionales del proyecto.......................................................................... 12 II.2.4 Etapa de construcción............................................................................................................................................ 12 II.2.5 Etapa de operación y mantenimiento.................................................................................................................... 13 II.2.6 Descripción de obras asociadas al proyecto........................................................................................................ 13 II.2.7 Etapa de abandono del sitio.................................................................................................................................. 13 II.2.8 Utilización de explosivos ....................................................................................................................................... 13 II.2.9 Generación, manejo y disposición de residuos sólidos, líquidos y emisiones a la atmósfera............................ 13 II.2.10 Infraestructura para el manejo y la disposición adecuada de los residuos...................................................... 13 III VINCULACIÓN CON LOS ORDENAMIENTOS JURÍDICOS APLICABLES EN MATERIA AMBIENTAL Y REGULACIONES DEL USO DE SUELO ........................................................................................ 14 III.1 ORDEN FEDERAL ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 III.1.1 Constitución Política Mexicana........................................................................................................................... 14 III.1.2 Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007-2012 ............................................................................................................ 15 III.1.3 Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente (LGEEPA-1996)..................................... 16 III.1.4 Reglamento de la Ley General del Equilibrio Ecológico y la Protección al Ambiente en Materia de Impacto ambiental.......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 III.1.5 Ley General de Asentamientos Humanos............................................................................................................ 19 III.1.6 Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable................................................................................................ 19 III.1.7 Reglamento de la Ley General de Desarrollo Forestal Sustentable (2005)...................................................... 20 III.2 ÁREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS ................................................................................................................................ 23 III.3 PROGRAMA SECTORIAL DE MEDIO AMBIENTE Y RECURSOS NATURALES , 2007-2012 (PSMA YRN)......................... 23 III.4 PROGRAMA NACIONAL HÍDRICO 2007-2012 Y LA PREVENCIÓN DE RIESGOS ............................................................. 24 III.5 ORDEN ESTATAL ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 MANIFESTACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL, MODALIDAD PARTICULAR para efectos del proyecto: Desarrollo El Cedro III.5.1 Plan Estatal de Desarrollo del Estado de Baja California Sur, 2005 –2011.................................................... 25 III.5.2 Ley de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección del Ambiente del Estado de Baja California Sur (1994)............... 26 III.5.3 Reglamento de la LEEPA de Baja California Sur.............................................................................................. 28 III.5.4 Reglamento de Fraccionamientos ....................................................................................................................... 28 III.5.5 Ley de Desarrollo Urbano para el Estado de Baja California Sur (1995) ....................................................... 33 III.6 ORDEN MUNICIPAL ....................................................................................................................................................... 34 III.6.1 Plan Municipal de Desarrollo La Paz, 2008-2011, H. XII Ayuntamiento, Municipio de La Paz, B.C.S......... 34 III.6.2 Reglamento de Planeación en el Municipio de La Paz ...................................................................................... 35 III.6.3 Reglamento de Protección al Medio Ambiente del Municipio de La Paz, B.C.S. (1995)................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Mountain Report Covers.Indd
    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document Volume 1, Public Information FERC Project No. 12509 January 2008 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document FERC Project No. 12509 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Date: January 2008 EAGLE MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT Table of Contents Table of Contents i 1 Introduction 1-1 2 Process Plan and Schedule 2-1 3 Project Location, Facilities, and Operations 3-1 3.1 Existing and Proposed Project Facilities 3-1 3.2 Current and Proposed Operations 3-13 3.3 Existing License 3-15 3.4 Plans for Future Development or Changes 3-15 4 Existing Environment and Resource Impacts 4-1 4.1 General Basin Description 4-1 4.2 Geology and Soils 4-3 4.2.1 Data or Studies Summaries 4-3 4.2.2 Description of Environment 4-4 4.2.2.1 General Geologic Setting 4-4 4.2.2.2 Project Area Geology 4-5 4.2.2.3 Formational Rock Stratigraphy 4-5 4.2.2.4 Surficial Deposits 4-7 4.2.2.5 Geologic Structures 4-9 4.2.2.6 Mineral Resources 4-9 4.2.2.7 Iron Ore Resources 4-10 4.2.2.8 Soil Resources 4-10 4.2.2.9 Earthquakes and Faults 4-13 4.2.2.10 Regional Faults 4-13 4.2.2.11
    [Show full text]
  • Martínez Jiménez Judith Tamar 2020.Pdf
    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL ESCUELA NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS SECCIÓN DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO E INVESTIGACIÓN CARACTERIZACIÓN PALINOLÓGICA DE LOS RECURSOS FLORALES UTILIZADOS POR Apis mellifera (APIDAE) EN LA REGIÓN DE LOS VALLES, DURANGO, MÉXICO TESIS Como uno de los requisitos para obtener el grado de MAESTRÍA EN BIOCIENCIAS Presenta: Judith Tamar Martínez Jiménez Directores de tesis Dr. Emilio Estrada-Ruiz Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Zoología, ENCB-IPN M. en C. David Leonor Quiroz García Laboratorio de Palinología, Departamento de Botánica, ENCB-IPN Ciudad de México, 2020. 1 SIP-14 INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL REP 2017 SECRETARÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y POSGRADO ACTA DE REVISIÓN DE TESIS En la Ciudad de México siendo las 13:00 horas del día 1 0 del mes de junio del 2020 se reunieron los miembros de la Comisión Revisora de la Tesis, designada por el Colegio de Profesores de Posgrado de: Biociencias para examinar la tesis titulada: “Caracterización palinológica de los recursos florales utilizados por Apis mellifera (Apidae) en la Región de los Valles, Durango, México” del (la) alumno (a): Apellido Martínez Apellido Jiménez Nombre (s): Judith Tamar Paterno: Materno: Número de registro: A 1 8 0 3 2 4 Biociencias Aspirante del Programa Académico de Posgrado: Una vez que se realizó un análisis de similitud de texto, utilizando el software antiplagio, se encontró que el trabajo de tesis tiene __12 % de similitud. Se adjunta reporte de software utilizado. Después que esta Comisión revisó exhaustivamente el contenido, estructura, intención y ubicación de los textos de la tesis identificados como coincidentes con otros documentos, concluyó que en el presente trabajo SI NO X SE CONSTITUYE UN POSIBLE PLAGIO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora and Floristic Relationships of the Sierra De La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad, Vol
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México León de la Luz, José Luis; Rebman, Jon; Domínguez-León, Miguel; Domínguez-Cadena, Raymundo The vascular flora and floristic relationships of the Sierra de La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 79, núm. 1, 2008, pp. 29-65 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42558786034 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 79: 29- 65, 2008 The vascular fl ora and fl oristic relationships of the Sierra de La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico La fl ora vascular y las relaciones fl orísticas de la sierra de La Giganta de Baja California Sur, México José Luis León de la Luz1*, Jon Rebman2, Miguel Domínguez-León1 and Raymundo Domínguez-Cadena1 1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. Apartado postal 128, 23000 La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico 2San Diego Museum of Natural History. Herbarium. P. O. Box 121390, San Diego, CA 92112 Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. The Sierra de La Giganta is a semi-arid region in the southern part of the Baja California peninsula of Mexico. Traditionally, this area has been excluded as a sector of the Sonoran Desert and has been more often lumped with the dry-tropical Cape Region of southern Baja California peninsula, but this classical concept of the vegetation has not previously been analyzed using formal documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDICES
    DRAFT Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDICES A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 L E A D A G E N CIES: P R E P A R E D B Y : California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 605 Third Street State Clearinghouse No. 2013091070 Encinitas, CA 92024 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road San Diego, CA 92127 Forest Service Publication No. R5-MB-277 APPENDICES TO THE DRAFT EIR/EIS FOR THE MASTER SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT POWER LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS Lead Agencies: California Public Utilities Commission and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest Prepared by: AUGUST 2014 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. APPENDIX BIO-1 Supplementary Special-Status Plants Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS The following 118 special-status plant species (organized by scientific name) are: (1) considered absent, (2) have a low potential to occur, or (3) have a moderate to high potential to occur and a “Low Rank”, which include those species with a CRPR 3.0, 4.0, or without a CRPR status, County List C, or only designated as NCCP and/or MSCP. Absent Species Of 118 special-status plant species, the following 76 special-status plant species are considered absent from the entire SDG&E’s proposed project area (see Table D.4-3 for special-status, potential to occur, and habitat requirements) and are not discussed further: California adolphia (Adolphia californica) Shaw’s agave (Agave shawii) Aphanisma (Aphanisma blitoides) Del Mar manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • CANOTIA Volume 3, Issue 3 Contents
    CANOTIA Volume 3, issue 3 Contents The Vascular Flora of San Tan Mountains Regional Park, Pinal County, Arizona Dixie Z. Damrel ……………………………………………………………………… 35 October 2007 Vascular Plant Herbarium School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University CANOTIA Editor: Leslie R. Landrum P. O. Box 874501 School of Life Sciences Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 ([email protected]) Associate Editor: Orbelia R. Robinson Botany Department California Academy of Sciences 875 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94103-3009 ([email protected]) Production Editor: S.T. Bates School of Life Sciences Arizona State University PO Box 874601 Tempe, AZ 85287-4601 ([email protected]) Canotia publishes botanical and mycological papers related to Arizona. These may include contributions to the Vas- cular Plants of Arizona project, checklists, local floras, new records for Arizona and ecological studies. All manu- scripts are peer-reviewed by specialists. Acceptance for publication will be at the discretion of the editor. At least 30 printed copies of each issue are distributed to libraries in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Anyone may download copies free of charge at http://lifesciences.asu.edu/herbarium/canotia.html. Canotia is named for Canotia holacantha Torr. (Celastraceae), a spiny shrub or small tree nearly endemic to Ari- zona. ISSN 1931-3616 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF SAN TAN MOUNTAINS REGIONAL PARK , PINAL COUNTY , ARIZONA Dixie Zank Damrel Research Associate Desert Botanical Garden 1201 North Galvin Parkway Phoenix, Arizona 85008 ABSTRACT San Tan Mountains Regional Park encompasses 4128 hectares of typical central Arizona basin and range country and is managed within the Maricopa County park system.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio Letter Report
    Biological Resources Project Report for the Lone Oak Road Project Record ID: PDS2014-TM-5585; PDS2014-MUP-14-017; Env Log: PDS2014-ER-14-08-006 Prepared for: The County of San Diego Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Drive, Suite 310 San Diego, California 92123 Project Applicant: Marker Lone Oak LLC 427 South Cedros Avenue, Suite 201 Solana Beach, California 92075 Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Anita Hayworth, Ph.D. Preparer’s Signature: ______________________ APRIL 2014 REVISED DECEMBER 2014 REVISED FEBRUARY 2015 Biological Resources Letter Report for the Lone Oak Road Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................1 2 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................3 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..............................................................................................5 4 PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................................7 5 PROJECT SETTING ........................................................................................................9 5.1 Topography and Land Uses .................................................................................... 9 5.2 Soils......................................................................................................................... 9 6 REGIONAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Page 27/31 Surface Area (M) Habitat Condition Pool Photos Pool Data
    Surface Area (m) length 12 width 3.5 length 25 width 4.25 Sampling 12 x 3.5 Estimated maximum 25 x 4.25 Habitat Condition Disturbed 1 Disturbance type tire tracks, garbage Land use of habitat road rut Pool Photos Photo Pool Data Pool ID C23 Water Temperature (°C) 22 Air Temperature (°C) 21 Anostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Anostracans Summary None Notostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Notostracans Summary None Page 27/31 Pool Depth (cm) At time of sampling 6 Estimated maximum 8 Surface Area (m) length 2.5 width 1 length 3 width 2 Sampling 2.5 x 1 Estimated maximum 3 x 2 Habitat Condition Disturbed 1 Disturbance type garbage, other Other disturbance Barbed wire Disturbance level heavy Land use of habitat ephemeral basin Pool Photos Photo Page 28/31 Pool Data Pool ID C24 Water Temperature (°C) 23 Air Temperature (°C) 21 Anostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Anostracans Summary None Notostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Notostracans Summary None Pool Depth (cm) At time of sampling 4 Estimated maximum 5 Surface Area (m) length 4 width 43.5 length 6 width 4.5 Sampling 4 x 43.5 Estimated maximum 6 x 4.5 Habitat Condition Disturbed 1 Disturbance type other Other disturbance Barbed wire Land use of habitat ephemeral basin Pool Photos Page 29/31 Photo Pool Data Pool ID C25 Water Temperature (°C) 19 Air Temperature (°C) 21 Anostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Anostracans Summary None Notostracans 0 No. of Individuals 0 Notostracans Summary None Pool Depth (cm) At time of sampling 9 Estimated maximum 13 Surface Area (m) length 1 width 0.25 length 3.5 width
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Plant Surveys and Vegetation Mapping For
    Appendix A Rare Plant and Vegetation Surveys 2002 and 2003 Santa Ysabel Ranch Open Space Preserve Prepared For The Nature Conservancy San Diego County Field Office The County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation By Virginia Moran, M.S. Botany Sole Proprietor Ecological Outreach Services P.O. Box 2858 Grass Valley, California 95945 Southeast view from the northern portion of the West Ranch with snow-frosted Volcan Mountain in the background. Information contained in this report is that of Ecological Outreach Services and all rights thereof reserved. Santa Ysabel Ranch Botanical Surveys 2 Contents I. Summary ……………………………………………………………… ……………. 4 II. Introduction and Methods……………………………..……………… …………… 5 III Results…………………………………………………………………...…………… 6 III.A. East Ranch Species of Interest Plant Communities III.B. West Ranch Species of Interest Plant Communities III.C. Sensitive Resources of the Santa Ysabel Ranch IV. Discussion……………………………………………………………….……………. 14 V. Conclusion…………………………………………….……………….……………… 18 VI. Management Recommendations…………………….……………………… …….. 19 VII. Suggested Future Projects………………….…….……………………… …………26 VIII. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………… …….. 28 IX. References Cited / Consulted ……………………..……………………………….. 29 X. Maps and Figures ………………………….……………………………… ……... 30 Appendices 1 - 6 …………………………….…………………………………………….…44 Santa Ysabel Ranch Botanical Surveys 3 I. Summary The Santa Ysabel Ranch Open Space Preserve was established in 2001 from a purchase by The Nature Conservancy from the Edwards Family; the Ranch is now owned by the County of San Diego and managed as a Department of Parks and Recreation Open Space Preserve. It totals nearly 5,400 acres and is comprised of two parcels; an "East Ranch” and a "West Ranch". The East Ranch is east of the town of Santa Ysabel (and Highway 79 running north) and is bordered on the east by Farmer's Road in Julian.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources
    Section 4.8 Biological Resources 4.8.1 Introduction In Riverside County, variation in topography, elevation, soil and climate create conditions for a wide variety of natural communities, each with its own assemblage of native plant and animal species. This section focuses on the natural communities and species of greatest concern to regional, state and federal agencies, and on the impacts that could arise from implementation of GPA No. 960. In EIR No. 441, certified for the original RCIP General Plan in December 2003, the biological resources chapter analyzed the “potential biological impacts that would occur in the absence of the western Riverside County and Coachella Valley MSHCPs.” Since then, both Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plans (MSHCPs) have been approved and are in full implementation. The impacts of GPA No. 960 within the respective coverage areas for the two MSHCPs are discussed below. Analysis is also provided for biological impacts and species that are not covered by the MSHCPs. In 2000, a description of the existing biological setting of Riverside County was prepared as part of the RCIP process. The resultant portion of the 2000 Existing Setting Report, Chapter 4.2, is used as the baseline for descriptions of the biological resources within Riverside County, with the acres of natural community types updated per new data sources as cited. Information from the RCIP effort (which led to the adoption of the 2003 RCIP General Plan) and new vegetation coverage data derived from the Western Riverside County MSHCP (WRC-MSHCP), Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CV-MSHCP), are used in the assessment of impacts.
    [Show full text]