DOCSLIB.ORG

Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDICES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DRAFT Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDICES A U G U S T 2 0 1 4 L E A D A G E N CIES: P R E P A R E D B Y : California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 605 Third Street State Clearinghouse No. 2013091070 Encinitas, CA 92024 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest 10845 Rancho Bernardo Road San Diego, CA 92127 Forest Service Publication No. R5-MB-277 APPENDICES TO THE DRAFT EIR/EIS FOR THE MASTER SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT POWER LINE REPLACEMENT PROJECTS Lead Agencies: California Public Utilities Commission and United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest Prepared by: AUGUST 2014 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. APPENDIX BIO-1 Supplementary Special-Status Plants Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS The following 118 special-status plant species (organized by scientific name) are: (1) considered absent, (2) have a low potential to occur, or (3) have a moderate to high potential to occur and a “Low Rank”, which include those species with a CRPR 3.0, 4.0, or without a CRPR status, County List C, or only designated as NCCP and/or MSCP. Absent Species Of 118 special-status plant species, the following 76 special-status plant species are considered absent from the entire SDG&E’s proposed project area (see Table D.4-3 for special-status, potential to occur, and habitat requirements) and are not discussed further: California adolphia (Adolphia californica) Shaw’s agave (Agave shawii) Aphanisma (Aphanisma blitoides) Del Mar manzanita (Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. crassifolia) Rainbow manzanita (Arctostaphylos rainbowensis) San Diego sagewort (Artemisia palmeri) Braunton’s milk-vetch (Astragalus brauntonii) Harwood’s milk-vetch (Astragalus insularis var. harwoodii) Jaeger’s bush milk‐vetch (Astragalus pachypus var. jaegeri) Coastal dunes milk-vetch (Astragalus tener var. titi) Coulter’s saltbush (Atriplex coulteri) South Coast saltscale (Atriplex pacifica) Parish’s brittlescale (Atriplex parishii) California ayenia (Ayenia compacta) Encinitas baccharis (Baccharis vanessae) Fremont barberry (Berberis fremontii) Nevin’s barberry (Berberis nevinii) Santa Rosa basalt brodiaea (Brodiaea santarosae) Little-leaf elephant tree (Bursera microphylla) Round‐leaved filaree (California macrophylla) Pink fairy‐duster (Calliandra eriophylla) August 2014 BIO-1-1 Draft EIR/EIS Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS Arizona pussypaws (Calyptridium parryi var. arizonicum [Calyptridium arizonicum]) San Luis Obispo sedge (Carex obispoensis) Arizona carlowrightia (Carlowrightia arizonica) San Bernardino Mountains owl’s-clover (Castilleja lasiorhyncha) Wart‐stemmed ceanothus (Ceanothus verrucosus) Orcutt’s pincushion (Chaenactis glabriuscula var. orcuttiana) Abrams’ spurge (Chamaesyce abramsiana) Salt marsh bird’s‐beak (Chloropyron maritimum [Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. maritimus]) Orcutt’s spineflower (Chorizanthe orcuttiana) San Miguel savory (Clinopodium chandleri [Satureja chandleri]) Las Animas colubrina (Colubrina californica) Orcutt’s bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus orcuttianus [Dicranostegia orcuttiana]) Small-flowered bird’s beak (Cordylanthus parviflorus) Del Mar Mesa sand aster (Corethrogyne filaginifolia var. linifolia ) California pricklypear (Cylindropuntia californica var. californica [Opuntia parryi var. serpentine]) Pink cholla (Cylindropuntia fosbergii) Arizona cottontop (Digitaria californica var. californica) Cuyamaca Lake downingia (Downingia concolor var. brevior) Short-leaved dudleya (Dudleya brevifolia [Blochmaniae] ssp. brevifolia) Oval-leaved dudleya (Dudleya cymosa ssp. ovatifolia) Sticky dudleya (Dudleya viscida) Palmer’s goldenbush (Ericameria palmeri var. palmeri) Sand-loving wallflower (Erysimum ammophilum) Annual rock-nettle (Eucnide rupestris) Flat-seeded spurge (Euphorbia platysperma [Chamaesyce platysperma]) San Diego barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) Chaparral ash (Fraxinus parryi) August 2014 BIO-1-2 Draft EIR/EIS Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS Borrego bedstraw (Galium angustifolium ssp. borregoense) Fremont’s gentian (Gentiana fremontii) Mission Canyon bluecup (Githopsis diffusa ssp. filicaulis) Curly herissantia (Herissantia crispa) Beach goldenaster (Heterotheca sessiliflora ssp. sessiliflora) Abrams’ alumroot (Heuchera abramsii) Otay Mountain lotus (Hosackia crassifolia var. otayensis) Decumbent goldenbush (Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens) San Diego marsh-elder (Iva hayesiana) Coulter’s goldfields (Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri) Heart-leaved pitcher sage (Lepechinia cardiophylla) Nutall’s lotus (Lotus nuttallianus) Parish’s desert-thorn (Lycium parishii) Brown turbans (Malperia tenuis) Spearleaf (Matelea parvifolia) Hairy stickleaf (Mentzelia hirsutissima) Creamy blazing star (Mentzelia tridentata) Willowy monardella (Monardella viminea) Dehesa nolina (Nolina interrata) Arizona pholistoma (Pholistoma auritum var. arizonicum) Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana) San Bernardino bluegrass (Poa atropurpurea) San Diego mesa mint (Pogogyne abramsii) Otay mesa mint (Pogogyne nudiuscula) Small-leaved rose (Rosa minutifolia) Shevock’s copper moss (Schizymenium [Mielichhoferia] shevockii) Parry’s tetracoccus (Tetracoccus dioicus) Sonoran maiden fern (Thelypteris puberula var. sonorensis) August 2014 BIO-1-3 Draft EIR/EIS Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS Low Potential to Occur Of 118 special-status plant species, the following 36 special-status plant species are considered to have a low potential to occur within the project areas (see Table D.4-3 for special-status, potential to occur, and habitat requirements) and are not discussed further: Pygmy lotus (Acmispon haydonii) Munz’s onion (Allium munzii) Singlewhorl burrobrush (Ambrosia monogyra) San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) Thread-leaved brodiaea (Brodiaea filifolia) Plummer’s mariposa lily (Calochortus plummerae) Intermediate mariposa lily (Calochortus weedii var. intermedius) Lewis’ evening-primrose (Camissoniopsis lewisii) Vail Lake ceanothus (Ceanothus ophiochilus) Otay Mountain ceanothus (Ceanothus otayensis) Southern tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. australis) Smooth tarplant (Centromadia pungens ssp. laevis) Summer holly (Comarostaphylis diversifolia ssp. diversifolia) Otay tarplant (Deinandra [Hemizonia] conjugens) Mojave tarplant (Deinandra mohavensis) Slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras) Many-stemmed dudleya (Dudleya multicaulis) San Diego button-celery (Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii) Mesa horkelia (Horkelia cuneata var. puberula) Mexican hulsea (Hulsea mexicana) Slender-leaved ipomopsis (Ipomopsis tenuifolia) Gander’s pitcher sage (Lepechinia ganderi) Borrego Valley pepper-grass (Lepidium flavum var. felipense) Intermediate monardella (Monardella hypoleuca ssp. intermedia) August 2014 BIO-1-4 Draft EIR/EIS Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS Jennifer’s monardella (Monardella stoneana) Appressed muhly (Muhlenbergia appressa) Little mousetail (Myosurus minimus ssp. apus) Spreading navarretia (Navarretia fossalis) California beardtongue (Penstemon californicus) Santiago Peak phacelia (Phacelia keckii) White rabbit-tabacco (Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum) Nuttall’s scrub oak (Quercus dumosa) Chaparral ragwort (Senecio aphanactis) Desert spike‐moss (Selaginella eremophila) Purple stemodia (Stemodia durantifolia) Orcutt’s woody-aster (Xylorhiza orcuttii) Moderate to High Potential to Occur (“Low Ranked Special-Status Species”) Of 118 special-status plant species, the following 6 special-status plant species are considered to have a moderate to high potential to occur within the project areas and a “Low Rank”, which include those species with a CRPR 3.0, 4.0, or without a CRPR status, County List C, or only designated as NCCP and/or MSCP (see Table D.4-3 for special-status, potential to occur, and habitat requirements). These species have reduced sensitivity status and impacts to these species from a linear project such as the proposed project, typically would not meet significance thresholds, therefore they are not discussed further: Slender-pod jewel flower (Caulanthus heterophyllus [Caulanthus stenocarpus]) Orange County Turkish rugging (Chorizanthe staticoides ssp. chrysacanthe)1 Panamint liveforever (Dudleya saxosa ssp. aloides [Dudleya alainae]) Sernal barley (Hordeum intercedens) Cuyamaca raspberry (Rubus glaucifolius var. ganderi)2 Chaparral nightshade (Solanum [Tenuilobatum] xanti) 1 Chorizanthe staticoides ssp. chrysacanthe is no longer recognized as a distinct taxa from the common species (University and Jepson Herbaria 2014). 2 A minor variant of Rubus glaucifolius (University and Jepson Herbaria 2014). August 2014 BIO-1-5 Draft EIR/EIS Master Special Use Permit and Permit to Construct Power Line Replacement Projects APPENDIX BIO-1 – SUPPLEMENTARY SPECIAL-STATUS PLANTS
Recommended publications
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source

    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report

    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements

    Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements

    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
  • California Miscellany IV Philip A

    California Miscellany IV Philip A

    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 4 1958 California Miscellany IV Philip A. Munz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Munz, Philip A. (1958) "California Miscellany IV," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 4: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol4/iss1/4 ALISO VoL. 4, No. 1, pp. 87-100 APRIL 25, 1958 CALIFORNIA MISCELLANY IV PHILIP A. MUNZ Various nomenclatural changes and novelties are herewith presented in order to be used in the forthcoming book "A California Flora" by Munz and Keck, in which the various taxa are treated at some length. Paper number III of this California Miscel­ lany series appeared in Aliso 3: 111-129, 1955. Cheilanthes jonesii (Maxon) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena jonesii Maxon, Am. Fern Journ. 7: 108, 1917. Following Copeland's recent reduction of Notbolaena to Cheilanthes, I find it necessary to make the above new combination and the following one. Cheilanthes sinuata (Lag.) Domin var. cochisensis (Goodding) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena cochisensis Goodding, Muhlenbergia 8: 93, 1912. N. sinuata var. cochisensis Weatherby in Johnston, Journ. Arnold Arb. 24: 314, 1943. Aleuritopteris cretacea (Liebm.) Fourn. subsp. nigrescens (Ewan) Munz, comb. nov. Notholaena californica D. C. Eat. subsp. nigrescens Ewan, Am. Fern Journ. 32: 93, 1942. Puccinellia erecta (Hitchcock) Munz, comb. nov. Glyceria erecta Hitchcock in Jepson, Fl. Calif. 1: 161, 1912. Panicularia erecta Hitchcock, Am. Journ. Bot. 2: 309, 1915. Torreyochloa erecta Church, Am. Journ. Bot.
  • Report of Science Advisors

    Report of Science Advisors

    Report of Science Advisors Solano County Natural Community Conservation Plan Habitat Conservation Plan November 2002 Reed Noss (Lead Reviewer and Editor), Ronald Amundson, Dick Arnold, Michael Bradbury, Sharon Collinge, Brenda Grewell, Richard Grosberg, Lester McKee, Phil Northen, Christina Swanson, and Ron Yoshiyama Facilitators: Bruce DiGennaro and Vance Russell TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction...............................................................................................................................5 1.1 Role of Science Advisors..............................................................................................5 1.2 Science Advisors Workshop.........................................................................................6 1.3 Report Organization......................................................................................................7 2.0 Regional and Historical Context...............................................................................................7 2.1 Biodiversity of the Region............................................................................................8 2.2 Geography and Geology ...............................................................................................9 2.3 Climate and Hydrology...............................................................................................14 3.0 Data Gaps and
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers

    Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers

    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
  • Eagle Mountain Report Covers.Indd

    Eagle Mountain Report Covers.Indd

    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document Volume 1, Public Information FERC Project No. 12509 January 2008 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc. 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Pre-Application Document FERC Project No. 12509 Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy, P.O. Box 2155, Palm Desert, CA 92261 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy Prepared by: GEI Consultants, Inc 10860 Gold Center Drive Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Date: January 2008 EAGLE MOUNTAIN PUMPED STORAGE PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT Table of Contents Table of Contents i 1 Introduction 1-1 2 Process Plan and Schedule 2-1 3 Project Location, Facilities, and Operations 3-1 3.1 Existing and Proposed Project Facilities 3-1 3.2 Current and Proposed Operations 3-13 3.3 Existing License 3-15 3.4 Plans for Future Development or Changes 3-15 4 Existing Environment and Resource Impacts 4-1 4.1 General Basin Description 4-1 4.2 Geology and Soils 4-3 4.2.1 Data or Studies Summaries 4-3 4.2.2 Description of Environment 4-4 4.2.2.1 General Geologic Setting 4-4 4.2.2.2 Project Area Geology 4-5 4.2.2.3 Formational Rock Stratigraphy 4-5 4.2.2.4 Surficial Deposits 4-7 4.2.2.5 Geologic Structures 4-9 4.2.2.6 Mineral Resources 4-9 4.2.2.7 Iron Ore Resources 4-10 4.2.2.8 Soil Resources 4-10 4.2.2.9 Earthquakes and Faults 4-13 4.2.2.10 Regional Faults 4-13 4.2.2.11
  • Martínez Jiménez Judith Tamar 2020.Pdf

    Martínez Jiménez Judith Tamar 2020.Pdf

    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL ESCUELA NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS SECCIÓN DE ESTUDIOS DE POSGRADO E INVESTIGACIÓN CARACTERIZACIÓN PALINOLÓGICA DE LOS RECURSOS FLORALES UTILIZADOS POR Apis mellifera (APIDAE) EN LA REGIÓN DE LOS VALLES, DURANGO, MÉXICO TESIS Como uno de los requisitos para obtener el grado de MAESTRÍA EN BIOCIENCIAS Presenta: Judith Tamar Martínez Jiménez Directores de tesis Dr. Emilio Estrada-Ruiz Laboratorio de Ecología, Departamento de Zoología, ENCB-IPN M. en C. David Leonor Quiroz García Laboratorio de Palinología, Departamento de Botánica, ENCB-IPN Ciudad de México, 2020. 1 SIP-14 INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL REP 2017 SECRETARÍA DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y POSGRADO ACTA DE REVISIÓN DE TESIS En la Ciudad de México siendo las 13:00 horas del día 1 0 del mes de junio del 2020 se reunieron los miembros de la Comisión Revisora de la Tesis, designada por el Colegio de Profesores de Posgrado de: Biociencias para examinar la tesis titulada: “Caracterización palinológica de los recursos florales utilizados por Apis mellifera (Apidae) en la Región de los Valles, Durango, México” del (la) alumno (a): Apellido Martínez Apellido Jiménez Nombre (s): Judith Tamar Paterno: Materno: Número de registro: A 1 8 0 3 2 4 Biociencias Aspirante del Programa Académico de Posgrado: Una vez que se realizó un análisis de similitud de texto, utilizando el software antiplagio, se encontró que el trabajo de tesis tiene __12 % de similitud. Se adjunta reporte de software utilizado. Después que esta Comisión revisó exhaustivamente el contenido, estructura, intención y ubicación de los textos de la tesis identificados como coincidentes con otros documentos, concluyó que en el presente trabajo SI NO X SE CONSTITUYE UN POSIBLE PLAGIO.
  • The Vascular Flora and Floristic Relationships of the Sierra De La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad, Vol

    The Vascular Flora and Floristic Relationships of the Sierra De La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico Revista Mexicana De Biodiversidad, Vol

    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México León de la Luz, José Luis; Rebman, Jon; Domínguez-León, Miguel; Domínguez-Cadena, Raymundo The vascular flora and floristic relationships of the Sierra de La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 79, núm. 1, 2008, pp. 29-65 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42558786034 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 79: 29- 65, 2008 The vascular fl ora and fl oristic relationships of the Sierra de La Giganta in Baja California Sur, Mexico La fl ora vascular y las relaciones fl orísticas de la sierra de La Giganta de Baja California Sur, México José Luis León de la Luz1*, Jon Rebman2, Miguel Domínguez-León1 and Raymundo Domínguez-Cadena1 1Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. Apartado postal 128, 23000 La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico 2San Diego Museum of Natural History. Herbarium. P. O. Box 121390, San Diego, CA 92112 Correspondent: [email protected] Abstract. The Sierra de La Giganta is a semi-arid region in the southern part of the Baja California peninsula of Mexico. Traditionally, this area has been excluded as a sector of the Sonoran Desert and has been more often lumped with the dry-tropical Cape Region of southern Baja California peninsula, but this classical concept of the vegetation has not previously been analyzed using formal documentation.
  • Vascular Type Specimens

    Vascular Type Specimens

    University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) 1201 Record(s) Page 1 of 322 COLO Type Specimens Acanthaceae Family: Acanthaceae Beloperone fragilis Robinson Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422655 Bar Code: 351023 Proofed: none. Location: San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Las Canoas. Habitat: Limestone ledges. Collector: C.G. Pringle #3933. Date: 30 October, 5 December 1891. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr. Annotations: = Beloperone tenera (Rob.) Turrill. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 27:183. 1892. Beloperone pringlei S. Watson Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422657 Bar Code: 351031 Proofed: none. Location: Nuevo Leon, Mexico. Hills near Monterey. Habitat: none. Collector: C.G. Pringle #2548. Date: 15 July & 1 August 1889. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr. Annotations: = Justicia straminea D. Gibson. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 25:160. 1890. Carlowrightia glandulosa Rob. & Greenm. Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422658 Bar Code: 356568 Proofed: none. Location: Oaxaca, Mexico. Monte Alban near Oaxaca. Habitat: none. 5500 ft. Collector: C.G. Pringle #6276. Date: 5 December 1895. Miscellaneous: 1-3 feet. Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr & Frt. Annotations: none. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 32:40. 1896. Carlowrightia ovata Gray Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422659 Bar Code: 356576 Proofed: none. Location: Chihuahua, Mexico. Ledges near Chihuahua. Habitat: none. Collector: C.G. Pringle #932. Date: 30 August 1885. Miscellaneous: Plantae Mexicanae. Gift from Colorado College 1984. Repr. Status: Flr & Frt. Annotations: none. References: Proc. Amer. Acad. 21:406. 1886. Page 2 of 322 COLO Type Specimens Acanthaceae Carlowrightia pringlei Rob. & Greenm. Type Status: Isotype Accession No: 422660 Bar Code: 356584 Proofed: none.
  • What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D

    What Is the Evidence That Invasive Species Are a Significant Contributor to the Decline Or Loss of Threatened Species? Philip D

    Invasive Species Systematic Review, March 2015 What is the evidence that invasive species are a significant contributor to the decline or loss of threatened species? Philip D. Roberts, Hilda Diaz-Soltero, David J. Hemming, Martin J. Parr, Richard H. Shaw, Nicola Wakefield, Holly J. Wright, Arne B.R. Witt www.cabi.org KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................. 1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 3 Keywords ................................................................................................................................. 4 Definitions ................................................................................................................................ 4 Background .............................................................................................................................. 5 Objective of the review ............................................................................................................ 7 The primary review question: ....................................................................................... 7 Secondary question 1: ................................................................................................. 7 Secondary question 2: ................................................................................................. 7 Methods
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae)

    Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae)

    Systematic Botany (2009), 34(1): pp. 182–197 © Copyright 2009 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae) David C. Tank, 1,3, 4 J. Mark Egger, 2 and Richard G. Olmstead 1,2 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 2 Herbarium, Burke Museum of Natural History, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 3 Present Address: Department of Forest Resources and Stillinger Herbarium, University of Idaho, PO Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U.S.A. 4 Author for Correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Lena Struwe Abstract— Recent molecular systematic research has indicated the need for a revised circumscription of generic boundaries in subtribe Castillejinae (tribe Pedicularideae, Orobanchaceae). Based on a well-resolved and well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis, we present a for- mal reclassification of the major lineages comprising the Castillejinae. Prior to this treatment, subtribe Castillejinae included Castilleja (ca. 190 spp.), Cordylanthus (18 spp.), Orthocarpus (9 spp.), Triphysaria (5 spp.), and the monotypic genera Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus. In the clas- sification presented here, Orthocarpus and Triphysaria retain their current circumscriptions, Castilleja is expanded to include Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus , and Cordylanthus is split into three genera; a key to the genera as they are recognized here is provided. Two new combinations, Castilleja beldingii and Castilleja ophiocephala , are proposed within the expanded Castilleja . The concept of Cordylanthus is restricted to the 13 species formerly recognized as subg. Cordylanthus , while subg. Dicranostegia and subg. Hemistegia are elevated to genus level ( Dicranostegia and Chloropyron , respectively).