DOCSLIB.ORG

CCNDDB Wide Tabular Report & Rare & Endangered Plant Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CCNDDB Wide Tabular Report & Rare & Endangered Plant Inventory Appendix A 1. California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB Wide Tabular Report 2. California Native Plant Rare and Endangered Plant Inventory California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB Wide Tabular Report Element Occ Ranks Population Status Presence CNDDB Total Historic Recent Pres. Poss. Name (Scientific/Common) Ranks Other Lists Listing Status EO's A B C D X U >20 yr <=20 yr Extant Extirp. Extirp. Abronia villosa var. aurita G5T3T4 CNPS: 1B.1 Fed: None 81 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 chaparral sand-verbena S2 Cal:None S:2 Accipiter cooperii G5 CDFG: Fed: None 103 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0 Cooper's hawk S3 Cal:None S:3 Acmispon haydonii G3 CNPS: 1B.3 Fed: None 32 0 2 1 0 0 10 4 9 13 0 0 pygmy lotus S2 Cal:None S:13 Active Desert Dunes G4 Fed: None 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 S2.2 Cal:None S:1 Anomala carlsoni G1 CDFG: Fed: None 24 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 0 23 0 0 Carlson's dune beetle S1 Cal:None S:23 Anomala hardyorum G1 CDFG: Fed: None 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 0 17 0 0 Hardy's dune beetle S1 Cal:None Antrozous pallidus G5 CDFG: SC Fed: None 402 1 1 0 0 0 8 7 3 10 0 0 pallid bat S3 Cal:None S:10 Aquila chrysaetos G5 CDFG: Fed: None 308 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 golden eagle S3 Cal:None S:2 Ardea alba G5 CDFG: Fed: None 35 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 great egret S4 Cal:None S:1 Ardea herodias G5 CDFG: Fed: None 132 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0 great blue heron S4 Cal:None S:3 Asio flammeus G5 CDFG: SC Fed: None 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 short-eared owl S3 Cal:None S:1 Astragalus insularis var. harwoodii G5T3 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 120 0 0 0 0 0 12 7 5 12 0 0 Harwood's milk-vetch S2 Cal:None S:12 Astragalus magdalenae var. peirsonii G3G4T2 CNPS: 1B.2 Fed: Threatened 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Peirson's milk-vetch S2 Cal:Endangered S:1 Astragalus sabulonum G5 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 19 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 gravel milk-vetch S2 Cal:None S:5 Athene cunicularia G4 CDFG: SC Fed: None 1862 27 4 16 2 0 211 13 247 260 0 0 burrowing owl S3 Cal:None S:260 Commercial Version -- Dated November 01, 2014 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 1 Report Printed on Tuesday, December 16, 2014 Information Expires 05/01/2015 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB Wide Tabular Report Element Occ Ranks Population Status Presence CNDDB Total Historic Recent Pres. Poss. Name (Scientific/Common) Ranks Other Lists Listing Status EO's A B C D X U >20 yr <=20 yr Extant Extirp. Extirp. Ayenia compacta G4 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 49 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 California ayenia S3? Cal:None S:1 Bursera microphylla G4 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 16 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 little-leaf elephant tree S2 Cal:None S:2 Buteo regalis G4 CDFG: Fed: None 102 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 ferruginous hawk S3S4 Cal:None S:2 Calliandra eriophylla G5 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 53 3 11 8 2 0 24 20 28 48 0 0 pink fairy-duster S2S3 Cal:None S:48 Carnegiea gigantea G5 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 19 0 1 0 1 0 3 3 2 5 0 0 saguaro S1 Cal:None S:5 Castela emoryi G4 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 56 0 1 0 2 1 3 3 4 6 1 0 Emory's crucifixion-thorn S2S3 Cal:None S:7 Chaenactis carphoclinia var. peirsonii G5T2 CNPS: 1B.3 Fed: None 12 0 1 0 0 0 6 1 6 7 0 0 Peirson's pincushion S2 Cal:None S:7 Chaetodipus fallax pallidus G5T34 CDFG: SC Fed: None 79 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 3 0 0 pallid San Diego pocket mouse S3S4 Cal:None S:3 Chamaesyce abramsiana G4 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 107 1 5 3 2 1 3 4 11 14 1 0 Abrams' spurge S2 Cal:None S:15 Chamaesyce arizonica G5 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 Arizona spurge S2 Cal:None S:1 Chamaesyce platysperma G3 CNPS: 1B.2 Fed: None 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 flat-seeded spurge S1 Cal:None S:1 Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus G3T3 CDFG: SC Fed: Threatened 121 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 western snowy plover S2 Cal:None S:2 Charadrius montanus G3 CDFG: SC Fed: None 88 0 1 0 0 0 22 0 23 23 0 0 mountain plover S2? Cal:None S:23 Chylismia arenaria G4? CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 16 1 0 0 0 0 6 6 1 7 0 0 sand evening-primrose S2 Cal:None S:7 Coccyzus americanus occidentalis G5T3Q CDFG: Fed: Proposed 119 0 0 2 1 0 12 13 2 15 0 0 western yellow-billed cuckoo S1 Threatened S:15 Cal:Endangered Commercial Version -- Dated November 01, 2014 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 2 Report Printed on Tuesday, December 16, 2014 Information Expires 05/01/2015 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB Wide Tabular Report Element Occ Ranks Population Status Presence CNDDB Total Historic Recent Pres. Poss. Name (Scientific/Common) Ranks Other Lists Listing Status EO's A B C D X U >20 yr <=20 yr Extant Extirp. Extirp. Colaptes chrysoides G5 CDFG: Fed: None 25 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 2 7 0 0 gilded flicker S1 Cal:Endangered S:7 Coleonyx switaki G4 CDFG: Fed: None 9 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 barefoot gecko S1 Cal:Threatened S:5 Colubrina californica G4 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 38 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 0 Las Animas colubrina S2S3 Cal:None S:3 Corynorhinus townsendii G3G4 CDFG: SC Fed: None 589 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 7 0 0 Townsend's big-eared bat S2S3 Candidate S:7 Cal:Threatened Crotalus ruber G4 CDFG: SC Fed: None 148 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 red-diamond rattlesnake S2? Cal:None S:2 Croton wigginsii G2G3 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 11 0 1 1 0 0 9 6 5 11 0 0 Wiggins' croton S2 Cal:Rare Crucifixion Thorn Woodland G3 Fed: None 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 S1.2 Cal:None S:1 Cylindropuntia munzii G3 CNPS: 1B.3 Fed: None 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 Munz's cholla S1 Cal:None Cyprinodon macularius G1 CDFG: Fed: Endangered 69 0 2 0 17 1 17 18 19 36 0 1 desert pupfish S1 Cal:Endangered S:37 Desert Fan Palm Oasis Woodland G3 Fed: None 80 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 S3.2 Cal:None S:5 Digitaria californica var. californica G5T5? CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 Arizona cottontop S2 Cal:None S:1 Ditaxis claryana G4G5 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 26 0 0 3 0 0 6 5 4 9 0 0 glandular ditaxis S1 Cal:None S:9 Empidonax traillii extimus G5T1T2 CDFG: Fed: Endangered 70 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7 0 0 southwestern willow flycatcher S1 Cal:Endangered S:7 Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii G5T1 CNPS: 1B.1 Fed: Endangered 71 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 San Diego button-celery S1 Cal:Endangered S:1 Eucnide rupestris G3 CNPS: 2B.2 Fed: None 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0 annual rock-nettle S1 Cal:None S:4 Commercial Version -- Dated November 01, 2014 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Page 3 Report Printed on Tuesday, December 16, 2014 Information Expires 05/01/2015 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB Wide Tabular Report Element Occ Ranks Population Status Presence CNDDB Total Historic Recent Pres. Poss. Name (Scientific/Common) Ranks Other Lists Listing Status EO's A B C D X U >20 yr <=20 yr Extant Extirp. Extirp. Eumops perotis californicus G5T4 CDFG: SC Fed: None 293 0 0 0 0 0 10 8 2 10 0 0 western mastiff bat S4 Cal:None S:10 Falco columbarius G5 CDFG: Fed: None 34 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 6 6 0 0 merlin S3S4 Cal:None S:6 Falco mexicanus G5 CDFG: Fed: None 458 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 7 0 0 prairie falcon S4 Cal:None S:7 Gelochelidon nilotica G5 CDFG: SC Fed: None 6 1 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 5 0 0 gull-billed tern S1 Cal:None S:5 Geraea viscida G3 CNPS: 2B.3 Fed: None 95 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 sticky geraea S3 Cal:None S:1 Gila elegans G1 CDFG: Fed: Endangered 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 bonytail S1 Cal:Endangered S:2 Gopherus agassizii G3 CDFG: Fed: Threatened 931 26 21 5 0 0 386 3 435 438 0 0 desert tortoise S2 Cal:Threatened S:438 Haliaeetus leucocephalus G5 CDFG: Fed: Delisted 316 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 bald eagle S2 Cal:Endangered S:1 Helianthus niveus ssp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Antonio Del Desierto Mobile Home Park Expansion Project Mecca, Riverside County, California
    San Antonio Del Desierto Mobile Home Park Expansion Project Mecca, Riverside County, California Biological Resources Assessment Prepared for: Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. 42635 Melanie Place, Ste 101 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Tel: (760) 341-4800 Contact: John D. Criste, Principal Prepared by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 1845 Chicago Avenue, Suite D Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 369-8060 Wood E&I Job # 322520099 Principal Investigator: Stephen J. Myers Document Author: Carla Sanchez May 2019 San Antonio Del Desierto Project Biological Resources Assessment Mecca, Riverside County, CA May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Site Description/Existing Conditions ......................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory Framework ......................................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal ................................................................................................ 3 1.3.2 State .................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 CVAG/Coachella Valley Conservation Commission ............................. 6 2.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 7 2.1
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source
    Pima County Plant List (2020) Common Name Exotic? Source McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies concolor var. concolor White fir Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica Corkbark fir Devender, T. R. (2005) Abronia villosa Hariy sand verbena McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon abutiloides Shrubby Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon berlandieri Berlandier Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon incanum Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Abutilon malacum Yellow Indian mallow Devender, T. R. (2005) Abutilon mollicomum Sonoran Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon palmeri Palmer Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) Abutilon parishii Pima Indian mallow McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon parvulum Dwarf Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium Abutilon pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Abutilon reventum Yellow flower Indian mallow Herbarium; ASU Vascular Plant Herbarium McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia angustissima Whiteball acacia Devender, T. R. (2005); DBGH McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia constricta Whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia greggii Catclaw acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) Acacia millefolia Santa Rita acacia McLaughlin, S. (1992) McLaughlin, S. (1992); Van Acacia neovernicosa Chihuahuan whitethorn acacia Devender, T. R. (2005) McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Acalypha lindheimeri Shrubby copperleaf Herbarium Acalypha neomexicana New Mexico copperleaf McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acalypha ostryaefolia McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acalypha pringlei McLaughlin, S. (1992) Acamptopappus McLaughlin, S. (1992); UA Rayless goldenhead sphaerocephalus Herbarium Acer glabrum Douglas maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer grandidentatum Sugar maple McLaughlin, S. (1992); DBGH Acer negundo Ashleaf maple McLaughlin, S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plant Press the ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY
    The Plant Press THE ARIZONA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 1 Summer 2013 In this Issue: Plants of the Madrean Archipelago 1-4 Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Conference 5-8 Abstracts of Botanical Papers Presented in the Madrean Archipelago Conference Southwest Coralbean (Erythrina flabelliformis). Plus 11-19 Conservation Priority Floras in the Madrean Archipelago Setting for Arizona G1 Conference and G2 Plant Species: A Regional Assessment by Thomas R. Van Devender1. Photos courtesy the author. & Our Regular Features Today the term ‘bioblitz’ is popular, meaning an intensive effort in a short period to document the diversity of animals and plants in an area. The first bioblitz in the southwestern 2 President’s Note United States was the 1848-1855 survey of the new boundary between the United States and Mexico after the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848 ended the Mexican-American War. 8 Who’s Who at AZNPS The border between El Paso, Texas and the Colorado River in Arizona was surveyed in 1855- 9 & 17 Book Reviews 1856, following the Gadsden Purchase in 1853. Besides surveying and marking the border with monuments, these were expeditions that made extensive animal and plant collections, 10 Spotlight on a Native often by U.S. Army physicians. Botanists John M. Bigelow (Charphochaete bigelovii), Charles Plant C. Parry (Agave parryi), Arthur C. V. Schott (Stephanomeria schotti), Edmund K. Smith (Rhamnus smithii), George Thurber (Stenocereus thurberi), and Charles Wright (Cheilanthes wrightii) made the first systematic plant collection in the Arizona-Sonora borderlands. ©2013 Arizona Native Plant In 1892-94, Edgar A. Mearns collected 30,000 animal and plant specimens on the second Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report
    Appendix F3 Rare Plant Survey Report Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District Draft CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT Rare Plant Survey Report Prepared for May 2011 Santa Margarita Water District 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.599.4300 www.esassoc.com Oakland Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills D210324 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery, and Storage Project: Rare Plant Survey Report Page Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................2 Objective .......................................................................................................................... 2 Project Location and Description .....................................................................................2 Setting ................................................................................................................................... 5 Climate ............................................................................................................................. 5 Topography and Soils ......................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • CDFG Natural Communities List
    Department of Fish and Game Biogeographic Data Branch The Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program List of California Terrestrial Natural Communities Recognized by The California Natural Diversity Database September 2003 Edition Introduction: This document supersedes all other lists of terrestrial natural communities developed by the Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). It is based on the classification put forth in “A Manual of California Vegetation” (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995 and upcoming new edition). However, it is structured to be compatible with previous CNDDB lists (e.g., Holland 1986). For those familiar with the Holland numerical coding system you will see a general similarity in the upper levels of the hierarchy. You will also see a greater detail at the lower levels of the hierarchy. The numbering system has been modified to incorporate this richer detail. Decimal points have been added to separate major groupings and two additional digits have been added to encompass the finest hierarchal detail. One of the objectives of the Manual of California Vegetation (MCV) was to apply a uniform hierarchical structure to the State’s vegetation types. Quantifiable classification rules were established to define the major floristic groups, called alliances and associations in the National Vegetation Classification (Grossman et al. 1998). In this document, the alliance level is denoted in the center triplet of the coding system and the associations in the right hand pair of numbers to the left of the final decimal. The numbers of the alliance in the center triplet attempt to denote relationships in floristic similarity. For example, the Chamise-Eastwood Manzanita alliance (37.106.00) is more closely related to the Chamise- Cupleaf Ceanothus alliance (37.105.00) than it is to the Chaparral Whitethorn alliance (37.205.00).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Determining Significance and Report Format and Content Requirements
    COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING SIGNIFICANCE AND REPORT FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT GROUP Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Public Works Fourth Revision September 15, 2010 APPROVAL I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and were considered by the Director of Planning and Land Use, in coordination with the Director of Public Works on September 15, 2O1O. ERIC GIBSON Director of Planning and Land Use SNYDER I hereby certify that these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources, Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources, and Report Format and Content Requirements for Resource Management Plans are a part of the County of San Diego, Land Use and Environment Group's Guidelines for Determining Significance and Technical Report Format and Content Requirements and have hereby been approved by the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer (DCAO) of the Land Use and Environment Group on the fifteenth day of September, 2010. The Director of Planning and Land Use is authorized to approve revisions to these Guidelines for Determining Significance for Biological Resources and Report Format and Content Requirements for Biological Resources and Resource Management Plans except any revisions to the Guidelines for Determining Significance presented in Section 4.0 must be approved by the Deputy CAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Baseline Assessment & Protected
    ALTEC Land Planning (760) 242-9917 19531 US Highway 18 Apple Valley, CA 92307 [email protected] BIOLOGICAL BASELINE ASSESSMENT & NATIVE PLANT REPORT: 8.52 ACRES, MOJAVE DRIVE, VICTORVILLE, CA BIOLOGICAL BASELINE ASSESSMENT & PROTECTED NATIVE DESERT TREE, PLANT AND CACTUS REPORT IN THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS: 3128-621-04-0000 REPORT #: 1 OF 2 & DIGITAL - FOR CITY OF VICTORVILLE PLANNING DEPT. REPORT #: 2 OF 2 & DIGITAL - FOR CLIENT PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 2092, PMB 18/52 IN THE SOUTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 10, T5N, R5W, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF VICTORVILLE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: THE RCH GROUP. C/O LUIS ROSAS, PROJECT MANAGER 11060 WHITE ROCK ROAD, SUITE 150 A RANCHO CORDOVA, CA 95670 916.782.4427 [email protected] PREPARED BY: ALTEC LAND PLANNING 19531 HIGHWAY 18 APPLE VALLEY, CA 92307 © REVISED - SEPTEMBER 2020 REPORT PREPARATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 2020 EFFECTIVE DATE OF REPORT: SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 EXPIRATION DATE OF REPORT: APRIL 1, 2021 (REPTILE & MAMMAL SPECIES ONLY) EXPIRATION DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 1, 2021 (ALL APPLICABLE BIRD SPECIES) DISTRIBUTION: 1 DIGITAL ORIGINAL TO CITY OF VICTORVILLE AND PAPER ORIGINAL TO CLIENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRESENTED IN THIS REPORT ARE ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Randolph J. Coleman, AICP CEP, CCIM, MIRM, PLS, PE, QSD/P CDFW Scientific Collecting Permit #11586 Certified Wildlife Biologist #43090 Certified Arborist & Tree Risk Assessment Qualified WE#8024A Qualified
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae
    SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOTANY 0 NCTMBER 52 Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae Harold Robinson, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, andJames F. Weedin SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS City of Washington 1981 ABSTRACT Robinson, Harold, A. Michael Powell, Robert M. King, and James F. Weedin. Chromosome Numbers in Compositae, XII: Heliantheae. Smithsonian Contri- butions to Botany, number 52, 28 pages, 3 tables, 1981.-Chromosome reports are provided for 145 populations, including first reports for 33 species and three genera, Garcilassa, Riencourtia, and Helianthopsis. Chromosome numbers are arranged according to Robinson’s recently broadened concept of the Heliantheae, with citations for 212 of the ca. 265 genera and 32 of the 35 subtribes. Diverse elements, including the Ambrosieae, typical Heliantheae, most Helenieae, the Tegeteae, and genera such as Arnica from the Senecioneae, are seen to share a specialized cytological history involving polyploid ancestry. The authors disagree with one another regarding the point at which such polyploidy occurred and on whether subtribes lacking higher numbers, such as the Galinsoginae, share the polyploid ancestry. Numerous examples of aneuploid decrease, secondary polyploidy, and some secondary aneuploid decreases are cited. The Marshalliinae are considered remote from other subtribes and close to the Inuleae. Evidence from related tribes favors an ultimate base of X = 10 for the Heliantheae and at least the subfamily As teroideae. OFFICIALPUBLICATION DATE is handstamped in a limited number of initial copies and is recorded in the Institution’s annual report, Smithsonian Year. SERIESCOVER DESIGN: Leaf clearing from the katsura tree Cercidiphyllumjaponicum Siebold and Zuccarini. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Main entry under title: Chromosome numbers in Compositae, XII.
    [Show full text]
  • Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice
    Steele/Burnand Anza-Borrego Desert Research Center University of California, Irvine UCI – NATURE and UC Natural Reserve System California State Parks – Colorado Desert District Anza-Borrego Desert State Park & Anza-Borrego Foundation Anza-Borrego Desert State Park Bibliography Compiled and Edited by Jim Dice (revised 1/31/2019) A gaggle of geneticists in Borrego Palm Canyon – 1975. (L-R, Dr. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Dr. Steve Bryant, Dr. Richard Lewontin, Dr. Steve Jones, Dr. TimEDITOR’S Prout. Photo NOTE by Dr. John Moore, courtesy of Steve Jones) Editor’s Note The publications cited in this volume specifically mention and/or discuss Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, locations and/or features known to occur within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, biological, geological, paleontological or anthropological specimens collected from localities within the present-day boundaries of Anza-Borrego Desert State Park, or events that have occurred within those same boundaries. This compendium is not now, nor will it ever be complete (barring, of course, the end of the Earth or the Park). Many, many people have helped to corral the references contained herein (see below). Any errors of omission and comission are the fault of the editor – who would be grateful to have such errors and omissions pointed out! [[email protected]] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As mentioned above, many many people have contributed to building this database of knowledge about Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. A quantum leap was taken somewhere in 2016-17 when Kevin Browne introduced me to Google Scholar – and we were off to the races. Elaine Tulving deserves a special mention for her assistance in dealing with formatting issues, keeping printers working, filing hard copies, ignoring occasional foul language – occasionally falling prey to it herself, and occasionally livening things up with an exclamation of “oh come on now, you just made that word up!” Bob Theriault assisted in many ways and now has a lifetime job, if he wants it, entering these references into Zotero.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Environmental Evaluation Committee Requested
    TO: ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AGENDA DATE: September 26, 2019 COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES AGENDA TIME 1:30 PM / No. 1 PROJECT TYPE: Orni 5-Truckhaven Geothermal Exploratory Wells & Seismic Testing Project - Initial Study #18-0025 SUPERVISOR DIST # 4 LOCATION: Salton Sea & Truck-haven Geothermal areas, APN: 017-340-003-, et.al Salton Sea Areas, CA PARCEL SIZE: various GENERAL PLAN (existing) Open Space / Salton Sea Urban Area Plan/ various GENERAL PLAN (proposed) ZONE (existing) S-1 Open Space/ State Lands/Parks/ Govt. /Federal ZONE (proposed) N/A GENERAL PLAN FINDINGS CONSISTENT INCONSISTENT MAY BE/FINDINGS PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION: HEARING DATE: APPROVED DENIED OTHER PLANNING DIRECTORS DECISION: HEARING DATE: APPROVED DENIED OTHER ENVIROMENTAL EVALUATION COMMITTEE DECISION: HEARING DATE: 09/26/2019 INITIAL STUDY: 18-0025 NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATED NEG. DECLARATION EIR DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS / APPROVALS: PUBLIC WORKS NONE ATTACHED AG NONE ATTACHED APCD NONE ATTACHED E.H.S. NONE ATTACHED FIRE / OES NONE ATTACHED SHERIFF NONE ATTACHED OTHER NAHC, REQUESTED ACTION: (See Attached) Planning & Development Services 801 MAIN ST., EL CENTRO, CA.., 92243 442-265-1736 (Jim Minnick, Director) Db\017\340\003\EEC hearing\projrep MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Initial Study & Environmental Analysis For: Truckhaven Geothermal Exploration Well Project Prepared By: COUNTY OF IMPERIAL Planning & Development Services Department 801 Main Street El Centro, CA 92243 (442) 265-1736 www.icpds.com September 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Tree 3 11 05
    Vegetation Classification of Joshua Tree National Park, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties, California A report submitted to National Park Service Tasha LaDaux, Chief of Resources Joshua Tree National Park 74485 National Park Drive Twentynine Palms, California 92277-3597 by California Department of Fish and Game Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch Sacramento, California by Todd Keeler-Wolf Sau San Diana Hickson March 2005 Section Page Table of Contents Section Page INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 Background and Standards............................................................................................ 1 Study Area ..................................................................................................................... 3 Timeline......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS..................................................................................................................... 4 Vegetation Sampling and Classification....................................................................... 4 Development of the Preliminary Classification ................................................... 4 Integration of Existing Data Sets.......................................................................... 4 Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 Sample Allocation
    [Show full text]