COUNCILMEMBERS Council Chamber Melissa Hernandez, Mayor Dublin Civic Center Shawn Kumagai, Vice Mayor 100 Civic Plaza Jean Josey, Councilmember Dublin, CA 94568 Sherry Hu, Councilmember www.dublin.ca.gov Michael McCorriston, Councilmember
Regular Meeting of the DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, February 16, 2021 Location: Electronic Methods
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 PM
Meeting Procedure During Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak: In keeping with the guidelines provided by the State of California and Alameda County Department of Public Health regarding gatherings during the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak, and recommendations to follow social distancing procedures, the City of Dublin will adopt the following practices during upcoming City Council meetings:
• The Dublin City Council will hold the meetings remotely via Zoom Video Communications. • Per normal practice, the meeting will be livestreamed and available at www.TV30.org for viewing and also broadcast live on Comcast T.V. channel 28 beginning at 7:00 p.m. This meeting will also be available on City’s website: https://dublin.ca.gov/1604/Meetings- Agendas-Minutes-Video-on-Demand • Online speaker slips will be available at www.dublin.ca.gov, and the public will be able to call in using a computer/or smart phone via a link which will be provided following submission of a speaker slip. A telephonic option will also be available. • Once connected, the public speaker will be connected to the Zoom webinar as an attendee and muted. The speaker will be able to see the meeting from inside Zoom. • When the agenda item upon which the individual would like to comment is addressed, the speaker will be announced in the meeting when it is his/her time to speak to the City Council. The speaker will then be unmuted for comment.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 3.1 Presentation of Plaques to Outgoing Commissioners and Committee Members The City Council will present plaques to outgoing Commissioners and Committee Members in appreciation of their dedicated service to the City. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Present the plaques. Staff Report Item 3.1 - PowerPoint Presentation
February 16, 2021 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 1 1
3.2 Public Comment At this time, the public is permitted to address the City Council on non-agendized items. Please step to the podium and clearly state your name for the record. COMMENTS SHOULD NOT EXCEED THREE (3) MINUTES. In accordance with State Law, no action or discussion may take place on any item not appearing on the posted agenda. The Council may respond to statements made or questions asked, or may request Staff to report back at a future meeting concerning the matter. Any member of the public may contact the City Clerk’s Office related to the proper procedure to place an item on a future City Council agenda. The exceptions under which the City Council MAY discuss and/or take action on items not appearing on the agenda are contained in Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(1)(2)(3).
4. CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar items are typically non-controversial in nature and are considered for approval by the City Council with one single action. Members of the audience, Staff or the City Council who would like an item removed from the Consent Calendar for purposes of public input may request the Mayor to remove the item.
4.1 Approval of the January 25, 2021 Special Joint Meeting and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the January 25, 2021 Special Joint Meeting Minutes and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the January 25, 2021 Joint Special Meeting Minutes and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes. Staff Report Attachment 1 - January 25, 2021 Joint Special Meeting Minutes Attachment 2 - February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
4.2 Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from January 1, 2021 - January 31, 2021 totaling $8,689,791.75. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. Staff Report Attachment 1 - Payment Issuance Report for January 2021
4.3 Grants of Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard and Scarlett Court The City Council will consider granting a portion of City property as Dublin Boulevard public street right-of-way and a portion of the City of Dublin Maintenance Corporation Yard property as Scarlett Court public street right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941- 550-18- 3, and adopt the Resolution Granting Public Right-of- Way for Scarlett Court over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-77-1. Staff Report Attachment 1 - Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-18-3 Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Dublin Blvd Public Right-of-Way Dedication Attachment 3 - Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Scarlett Court over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-77-1 Attachment 4 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Scarlett Court Right-of-Way Dedication February 16, 2021 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 2 2
4.4 City Treasurer’s Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2020 The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending December 31, 2020 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $327,123,861 (market value) with an average market yield of 0.28%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the City Treasurer’s Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2020. Staff Report Attachment 1 - City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending December 31, 2020 Attachment 2 - Transaction Ledger - October through December 2020
4.5 Approval of Plans and Specifications, Reject Bid Protest, and Award of Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Project No. PK0119 The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications, rejecting a bid protest, and awarding a contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 project, CIP No. PK0119. The scope of work includes construction of a cricket pitch, lighted batting cages, four volleyball courts, play area, and two little league baseball fields. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Rejecting a Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Project, CIP No. PK0119. Staff Report Attachment 1 - Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Rejecting a Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park Attachment 2 - FSP3 CIP Budget Attachment 3 - Bid Results Attachment 4 - Bid Protest RAB Attachment 5 - Resolution 57-20
4.6 Acceptance of Donations from the Bilich Family/Preferred Financial Group The City Council will consider acceptance of a donation of $1,000 from the Bilich Family/ Preferred Financial Group to be used for equipment, operating supplies, and training for the Crime Prevention Unit of Dublin Police Services. The City Council will also present the group with a Certificate of Appreciation for the donation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the donation and recognize the Bilich Family/Preferred Financial Group. Staff Report Attachment 1 - Bilich Family Certification of Recognition
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION – None.
6. PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 Kent Property General Plan Amendment and Rezoning (PLPA-2019-00002)
February 16, 2021 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 3 3
The City Council will consider a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning of a 1.5-acre property located at 6207 Sierra Court known as the Kent property. The proposal includes an amendment to the General Plan land use designation of the property from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and an associated Rezone from M-1 (Light Industrial) to C-2 (General Commercial). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City prepared an Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the proposed project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing and: 1) Adopt the Resolution Adopting the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and Amending the General Plan Land Use Designation at 6207 Sierra Court from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive; and 2) Waive Reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map for Property Located at 6207 Sierra Court from M-1 to C-2. Staff Report Attachment 1 - City Council Resolution Adopting the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and Amending the General Plan Land Use Designation Attachment 2 - Exhibit A to the Resolution - Initial Study, Negative Declaration Attachment 3 - City Council Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map for Property Located at 6207 Sierra Court Attachment 4 - Planning Commission Resolution 21-01 Item 6.1 - PowerPoint Presentation
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS – None.
8. NEW BUSINESS 8.1 Two-Year Strategic Plan Quarterly Update The City Council will receive a status update on the City’s Two-Year Strategic Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report Staff Report Attachment 1 - November 17, 2020 Staff Report: Q1 Strategic Plan Update Item 8.1 - PowerPoint Presentation
9. OTHER BUSINESS Brief information only reports from City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234).
10. ADJOURNMENT
This AGENDA is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a)
If requested, pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.2, this agenda shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Section 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. To make a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, please contact the City Clerk’s Office (925) 833-6650 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Mission
February 16, 2021 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 4 4
The City of Dublin promotes and supports a high quality of life, ensures a safe and secure environment, fosters new opportunities, provides equity across all programs, and champions a culture of diversity and inclusion.
February 16, 2021 Dublin City Council Regular Meeting Agenda 5 5
Agenda Item 3.1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 16, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Presentation of Plaques to Outgoing Commissioners and Committee Members Prepared by: Marsha Moore, MMC, City Clerk
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will present plaques to outgoing Commissioners and Committee Members in appreciation of their dedicated service to the City.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Present the plaques.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will present plaques to Amit Kothari and Dawn Plants (Planning Commission); Michelle Smith McDonald (Parks and Community Services Commission); Georgean Vonheeder- Leopold, Sawsan Wolski, and Timea Iharosi (Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission); Connie Mack and Susan Miller (Senior Center Advisory Committee); and Candy Velsasco and Nelia Soares (Human Services Commission).
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
Page 1 of 1 6 Recognition of Outgoing Commissioners and Committee Members
February 16, 2021
7 Planning Commission
• Amit Kothari • Dawn Plants (Alternate Commissioner)
8 Parks & Community Services Commission
• Michelle Smith McDonald
9 Heritage & Cultural Arts Commission
• Georgean Vonheeder-Leopold • Sawsan Wolski • Timea Iharosi
10 Senior Center Advisory Committee
• Connie Mack • Susan Miller
11 Human Services Commission
• Candy Velasco • Nelia Soares (Alternate Commissioner)
12 Thank you for your service to the City of Dublin
13 Agenda Item 4.1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 16, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of the January 25, 2021 Special Joint Meeting and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Prepared by: Marsha Moore, MMC, City Clerk
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the January 25, 2021 Special Joint Meeting Minutes and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the January 25, 2021 Joint Special Meeting Minutes and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None.
DESCRIPTION:
The City Council will consider approval of the minutes of the January 25, 2021 Special Joint Meeting Minutes and February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) January 25, 2021 Joint Special Meeting Minutes 2) February 2, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
Page 1 of 1 14 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL, PLANNING COMMISSION, HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION, AND SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Joint Special Meeting: January 25, 2021
A Joint Special Meeting of the Dublin City Council, Planning Commission, Human Services Commission, Heritage and Cultural Arts Commission, and Senior Center Advisory Committee was held on Monday, January 25, 2021, remotely via Zoom Video Communications. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM, by Mayor Hernandez. Having already completed the AB1234 Ethics Training, Mayor Hernandez left the meeting.
1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance
Attendees Present Title Melissa Hernandez Mayor Shawn Kumagai Vice Mayor Jean Josey Councilmember Michael McCorriston Councilmember Sherry Hu Councilmember Catheryn Grier Planning Commissioner Janine Thalblum Planning Commissioner Renata Tyler Planning Commissioner Stephen Wright Planning Commissioner Dawn Benson Planning Commissioner Kashef Qaadri Alternate Planning Commissioner Elaine Bagwell Alternate Planning Commissioner Robert Bennett Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissioner Shweta Agrawal Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissioner Kathy Blackburn Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissioner Steve Minniear Heritage and Cultural Arts Commissioner Michele Wayland Senior Center Advisory Committee Member Kebin Lu Senior Center Advisory Committee Member Shawn Costello Human Services Commissioner Janet Songey Human Services Commissioner Ankita Sharma Human Services Commissioner Rose Hunt Human Services Commissioner
MINUTES 1 JOINT SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 25, 2021
15 2. AB-1234 Mandatory Ethics Training – Principles of Ethics and The Law in Public Service
AB-1234 Mandatory Ethics Training was provided by Jordyn Bishop, Acting Assistant City Attorney, and Rachel Hundley, Attorney, of Meyers Nave.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned by Vice Mayor Kumagai at 8:10 p.m.
Vice Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MINUTES 2 JOINT SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 25, 2021
16 MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN Regular Meeting: February 2, 2021
A Regular Meeting of the Dublin City Council was held on Tuesday, February 2, 2021, remotely via Zoom Video Communications. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM, by Mayor Hernandez.
1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Title Status Melissa Hernandez Mayor Present Shawn Kumagai Vice Mayor Present Jean Josey Councilmember Present Michael McCorriston Councilmember Present Sherry Hu Councilmember Present
2. Pledge of Allegiance The pledge of allegiance was recited by the City Council and Staff.
3. Oral Communications
3.1. Employee Introduction
The City Council welcomed new Staff member, Michelle Sung, Environmental Technician in the Public Works Department.
3.2. Recognition of Dublin Rotary on its 50th Anniversary
The City Council recognized the contribution and service of the Rotary Club of Dublin in celebration of its 50th anniversary.
3.3. Public Comment
Steve Minniear provided public comment.
Mike Grant provided public comment.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 1 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021
17 4. Consent Calendar
4.1. Approved the January 12, 2021 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes.
4.2. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 06 - 21
DECLARING WEEDS AND COMBUSTIBLE REFUSE A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING THE ABATEMENT THEREOF
4.3. Received a report outlining Alameda County Fire Department’s compliance with the annual inspection requirements set forth in California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3. This report serves to meet the reporting requirements set forth in Senate Bill No. 1205.
4.4. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 07 - 21
AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF TWO MARKED POLICE VEHICLES FROM DUBLIN CHEVROLET AND DECLARING REPLACED VEHICLES AS SURPLUS PROPERTY
4.5. Received the Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers showing payments issued from December 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 totaling $6,893,382.67.
4.6. Approved the proclamations for the month of February in the City of Dublin: American Heart Month, African American History Month, and National Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month.
4.7. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 08 - 21
APPROVING THE 2021 CITY OF DUBLIN LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM
4.8. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 09 - 21
APPROVING THE UPGRADE FROM LASERFICHE AVANTE TO LASERFICHE RIO AND APPROVING THE FUTURE PURCHASE OF LASERFICHE LICENSES AND ECS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021
18 4.9. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 10 - 21
APPROVING THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SFPP L.P. FOR PIPELINE RELOCATION FOR THE SCARLETT DRIVE EXTENSION PROJECT
4.10. Adopted RESOLUTION NO. 11 - 21
AMENDING AND RESTATING THE BYLAWS AND RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION, PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION, HERITAGE AND CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION, SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND YOUTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS 101-20 and 19-16
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Shawn Kumagai, Vice Mayor SECOND: Melissa Hernandez, Mayor AYES: Hernandez, Hu, Josey, Kumagai, McCorriston
5. Written Communication – None.
6. Public Hearing – None.
7. Unfinished Business – None.
8. New Business 8.1. Semi-Public Sites and New Dublin High School General Plan Amendment Study Initiation Request (PLPA-2020-00054)
The City Council received the presentation to consider approval on initiating a General Plan Amendment Study for three sites, including 2.5 acres on the GH PacVest property and 2.0 acres on the East Ranch property in Eastern Dublin, as well as the future Emerald High School site, totaling approximately 23.46 acres, located at 3501 Dublin Boulevard. The Study would evaluate a proposal to change the existing General Plan land use designation for the former two sites from Semi-Public to Public/Semi-Public to allow a broader range of uses, including the potential for affordable housing
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 3 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021
19 developed by a non-profit entity. The General Plan would also be updated to change the future high school site from Neighborhood Commercial to Public/Semi-Public consistent with the planned use of the property as a high school site.
On motion of Councilmember Josey, seconded by Vice Mayor Kumagai, and by unanimous vote, the City Council adopted
RESOLUTION NO. 12 - 21
APPROVING THE INITIATION OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY TO EVALUATE CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM SEMI-PUBLIC TO PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOR 2.5 ACRES OF THE GH PACVEST PROPERTY AND 2.0 ACRES OF THE EAST RANCH PROPERTY, AND THE EMERALD HIGH SCHOOL SITE FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC APN: 958-0078-004, 005, 006, AND 007 (PLPA-2020-000054)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS] MOVED BY: Jean Josey, Councilmember SECOND: Shawn Kumagai, Vice Mayor AYES: Hernandez, Hu, Josey, Kumagai, McCorriston
9. Other Business Brief information only reports from the City Council and/or Staff, including committee reports and reports by the City Council related to meetings attended at City expense (AB1234).
By consensus, the City Council directed Staff to add Development Disabilities Awareness Month Proclamation for the Month of March to a future agenda and asked that the Librarian be invited to make a presentation on the reopening plan for the Dublin Library.
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 4 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021
20 10.Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 p.m.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5 REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 2, 2021
21 Agenda Item 4.2 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 16, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Payment Issuance Report and Electronic Funds Transfers Prepared by: Veronica Briggs, Senior Finance Technician
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive a listing of payments issued from January 1, 2021 – January 31, 2021 totaling $8,689,791.75.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the report.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
SUMMARY OF PAYMENTS ISSUED January 1, 2021 through January 31, 2021
Total Number of Payments: 234 Total Amount of Payments: $8,689,791.75
DESCRIPTION:
The Payment Issuance Report (Attachment 1) provides a listing of all payments for the period beginning January 1, 2021 through January 31, 2021. This report is provided in accordance with the policy adopted November 15, 2011, in Resolution No.189-11. The listing of payments has been reviewed in accordance with the policies for processing payments and expenditures.
The City’s practice of reporting payments to the City Council after the payments have been made is in compliance with California Government Code Sections 37208 (b) and (c), which allow for an agency to make payments without first being audited by the legislative body, as long as such payments are: 1) conforming to a budget approved by ordinance or resolution of the legislative body; and 2) presented to the legislative body for ratification and approval in the form of an audited comprehensive annual financial report.
Page 1 of 2 22 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Payment Issuance Report for January 2021
Page 2 of 2 23 Attachment 1
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 1 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description
01/07/2021 7400 AMADOR LLC 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 888 WELLNESS INC 1,957.26 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 AMAZING BASIL, INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 BAY ALARM COMPANY 335.76 ALARM SERVICES CIVIC CENTER 600.00 ALARM SERVICES CORP YARD 172.50 ALARM SERVICES FIRE STATION 16 237.75 ALARM SERVICES FIRE STATION 17 1,846.26 ALARM SERVICES HERITAGE CENTER 628.71 ALARM SERVICES SENIOR CENTER 541.86 ALARM SERVICES SHANNON CENTER 2,070.00 ALARM SERVICES WAVE Check Total: 6,432.84 01/07/2021 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 740.00 FALLON SPORTS PARK DESIGN SVCS - PHASE 3 01/07/2021 BLACK NOSES LLC 6,095.57 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 3,653.50 CONSTR INSPECTION/TESTING-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND 811.00 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS-FALLON SPORTS PARK PH3 Check Total: 4,464.50 01/07/2021 CASA OROZCO 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 CNG INTERNATIONAL LLC 4,009.39 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 DUBLIN VALERO INC. 5,757.71 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 IRON HORSE OPTOMETRIC GROUP 5,848.67 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 LIBERTY FLOOR COVERING, INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 LPA, INC. 5,062.50 DESIGN SVCS-CIVIC CTR HVAC/ROOF REPLACEMENT 01/07/2021 MANDARA NAIL SPA, INC 2,203.25 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 MONACO HAIR & NAILS INC 1,825.98 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 9,067.50 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1,239.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT-DON BIDDLE PARK 11,328.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND Check Total: 21,634.50 01/07/2021 PATTERSON LIFT TRUCKS, INC. 428.16 FORKLIFT MAINTENANCE 01/07/2021 PG&E 4,100.53 SERVICE TO 12/07/2020 83.20 SERVICE TO 12/09/2020 1,605.95 SERVICE TO 12/10/2020 419.11 SERVICE TO 12/11/2020 Check Total: 6,208.79 01/07/2021 PGADESIGN INC. 21,425.50 HERITAGE PARK IMPROVEMENTS DESIGN SVCS 01/07/2021 PKB VENTURES INC. 9,870.60 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 QUENCH USA, INC. 544.07 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SERVICES 01/07/2021 SARAF LLC 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 5,431.80 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT FY20-21 01/07/2021 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 553.00 STORMWATER PERMIT FOR DUBLIN BLVD WIDENING 01/07/2021 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 40,745.00 PROJ MGMT/INSPECT-CIVIC CTR HVAC/ROOF PROJECT 01/07/2021 THE BLUEPRINT SHOP 2,029.89 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/07/2021 TRC ENGINEERS, INC 23,344.06 2020 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MGMT/INSPECT SVCS 01/07/2021 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 5,087.53 FUEL NOV 2020 01/07/2021 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 2,533.96 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT FY20-21 01/07/2021 U S BANK ST. PAUL 2,032,601.52 SPECIAL TAX REVENUE COLLECTED CFD 2015-1 01/07/2021 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 665.57 PD TRAILER SEPTIC TANK SERVICES 24
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 2 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/07/2021 UNIVERSAL BUILDING SERVICES 566.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES CIVIC CENTER
828.00 CARPET CLEANING SERVICES THE WAVE
700.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES LIBRARY Check Total: 2,094.00 01/07/2021 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 3,080.00 PLAN REVIEW SERVICES-FALLON SPORTS PARK Payments Issued 1/7/2021 Total: 2,272,675.62
01/08/2021 CAL PERS 79,637.94 PERS RETIREMENT PLAN: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 19,574.54 CA STATE WITHHOLDING: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 I C M A 401 PLAN 1,610.60 DEFERRED COMP 401A: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 I C M A 457 PLAN 27,174.12 DEFERRED COMP 457: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 60,544.47 FEDERAL WITHHOLDING: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 U.S. BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM 185.00 AFTER THE ELECTION & NEW LAW WKSHP REG-DIAZ
1,370.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN DUES-CASS/WONG
195.00 CA ACADEMY FOR ECON DEV EXAM FEE-WETHERFORD
620.00 CA BLDG OFFICIALS TRAINING REG-WHEELER
150.00 CITY CLERK NEW LAW SEMINAR REG-MOORE
2,119.20 CITY COUNCIL INSTALLATION, INSIDE DUBLIN SUPPLIES
4,409.90 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT & ACCESSORIES
855.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE & EQUIPMENT
815.57 DUBLIN PRIDE SUPPLIES & PW CONF REG-CHING
1,075.17 EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION LUNCHEON EXPENSE
1,039.80 EMPLOYMENT AD POSTINGS
2,110.00 HR GENERALIST CERTIFICATION TRAINING
1,793.91 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND & CHRISTMAS SUPPLIES
960.73 IMAGINE PLAYGROUND DEDICTION SUPPLIES
299.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT VIRTUAL CONF REG-ALEX
75.00 MMANC MEMBERSHIP DUES-A. SMITH
12.00 NEWS SUBSCRIPTION
361.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
550.41 OFFICE EQUIPMENT & DISINFECTING SUPPLIES
422.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES
6,469.43 POLICE SUPPLIES
457.61 PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES
116.00 PROF ENGINEER LICENSE RENEWAL-SUCGANG
240.57 RECREATION SUPPLIES
1,616.25 RE-USABLE DUBLIN FACE MASKS
1,173.83 SHELVES FOR EVENTS STORAGE
10.00 STATE OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDRESS
59.99 STOCK IMAGES
1,500.00 STREETSAVER ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION
146.75 SUPPLIES FOR DRIVE-THRU HALLOWEEN
195.40 THE WAVE SUPPLIES
251.12 VIDEO RECORDING EQUIPMENT Check Total: 31,656.69
25
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 3 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/08/2021 US BANK - PARS 207.54 PARS: PE 1/1/21 01/08/2021 WAGEWORKS, INC. 87,851.27 WAGEWORKS: PE 1/1/21 Payments Issued 1/8/2021 Total: 308,257.17
01/11/2021 4LEAF INC. 50,564.00 BLDG INSPECTION/PLAN CHECK SVCS NOV 2020 01/11/2021 ADVANCED MOBILITY GROUP 2,823.13 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
3,300.00 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES Check Total: 6,123.13 01/11/2021 ALAMEDA CO SHERIFF'S OFFICE 371.25 NARCOTICS ENVELOPES & STICKERS 01/11/2021 AMP PRINTING, INC. 180.26 PRINTING FOR HOLIDAY HOME DECORATING CONTEST 01/11/2021 ARORA, AKSHAY 7,371.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/11/2021 AXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH 3,637.00 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT OCT - DEC 2020 01/11/2021 BIG O'TIRES #7 387.27 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 01/11/2021 BLUETOAD, INC. 390.00 DIGITAL VERSION-WINTER/SPRING ACTIVITY GUIDE 01/11/2021 CAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY INC 3,466.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2020 01/11/2021 CHRISP COMPANY 29,117.02 ON-CALL STRIPING AND MARKING SERVICES 01/11/2021 COMMUNICATION ACADEMY 434.00 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/11/2021 CSI FORENSIC SUPPLY 521.41 POLICE EVIDENCE SUPPLIES 01/11/2021 CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING 1,820.00 ENGINEERING SVCS MAINT/CORP YARD IMPROVEMENT 01/11/2021 DEAM, VALERIE 1,106.40 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR 01/11/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 160.00 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES NOV 2020 01/11/2021 DHADWAL, RENUKA 800.00 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARD - 20 YEARS 01/11/2021 DUBLIN CHEVROLET 257.60 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/11/2021 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 1,590.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2020 01/11/2021 ELECTRICBABY, INC. 3,000.00 HOUSING CONSULTING SERVICES 01/11/2021 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR 1,878.11 VEHICLE RENTAL-SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT 01/11/2021 FRANKLIN, RHONDA 600.00 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARD - 15 YEARS 01/11/2021 GHD, INC. 456.00 VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY DEC 2020 01/11/2021 JOHNSON, JENNIFER 14.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT -DEC 2020 01/11/2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 19,290.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2020 01/11/2021 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 281.04 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/11/2021 LOGOBOSS 374.00 CITY COUNCIL PLAQUES-OUTGOING COUNCIL 2020 01/11/2021 MEYERS NAVE 212.50 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD LEGAL SERVICES OCT 2020
25,882.23 LEGAL SERVICES NOV 2020 Check Total: 26,094.73 01/11/2021 MILLER, YUVAL 2,425.00 ARBITRATION SERVICES 01/11/2021 OFFICE TEAM 1,736.16 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT 01/11/2021 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 10,934.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - NOV 2020 01/11/2021 PG&E 36.14 SERVICE TO 11/23/2020
7,703.43 SERVICE TO 12/04/2020
1,494.79 SERVICE TO 12/10/2020
2,131.02 SERVICE TO 12/14/2020
65.21 SERVICE TO 12/15/2020 Check Total: 11,430.59 01/11/2021 PHOENIX GROUP INFO SYS. 242.00 PARKING CITATION PROCESSING NOV 2020 01/11/2021 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 1,650.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SERVICES 01/11/2021 RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CA CORP 1,061.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES - OCT 2020 01/11/2021 SESAC, INC. 32.21 ANNUAL MUSIC LICENSE 2021 01/11/2021 SHIR MARTIAL ARTS 305.20 REC CLASS INSTRUCTOR
26
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 4 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/11/2021 SHUMS CODA ASSOCIATES INC 4,440.00 PLAN CHECK SERVICES NOV 2020 01/11/2021 STANFORD HEALTH -VALLEYCARE 310.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL SCREENING & COVID-19 TESTS 01/11/2021 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 22,475.00 WATER BOARD ANNUAL PERMIT FEE 01/11/2021 STONERIDGE CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE 1,012.62 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENCE & REPAIR 01/11/2021 SURF TO SNOW ENVIRONMENTAL 1,194.00 SPILL RESPONSE ASSISTANCE & MRP INSPECTIONS 01/11/2021 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 2,947.50 PARKING CITATIONS COLLECTED NOV 2020 01/11/2021 TRI-VALLEY COMMUNITY TV 887.62 RECORD/TELEVISE CITY COUNCIL/PLNG COMM MTGS 01/11/2021 UNITED RENTALS 2,724.78 BACKHOE REPAIRS
2,928.92 MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS FOR BACKHOE
378.41 MAINTENANCE FOR BACKHOE Check Total: 6,032.11 01/11/2021 VICTORIA, JUSTIN 673.00 HERITAGE PARK RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND 01/11/2021 WAGEWORKS, INC. 533.00 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT FEES DEC 2020 01/11/2021 WB2J, INC. 2,409.28 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM Payments Issued 1/11/2021 Total: 233,015.92
01/12/2021 UNUM LIFE INS CO OF AMERICA 11,745.80 LIFE AND AD&D PREMIUM - JAN 2021 Payments Issued 1/12/2021 Total: 11,745.80
01/15/2021 CALPERS 69,095.52 2021 REPLACEMENT CHARGES FOR CITY OF DUBLIN Payments Issued 1/15/2021 Total: 69,095.52
01/19/2021 ABHIPRA INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 107,750.61 ZONE 7 FEES COLLECTED OCT-DEC 2020 01/19/2021 ALPHA OMEGA WIRELESS, INC 2,530.00 ANNUAL WIRELESS SUPORRT TO CORP YARD 01/19/2021 AMP PRINTING, INC. 60.65 BUSINESS CARDS 01/19/2021 ART PROCESS BY PROCESS03 5,238.47 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 AT&T 3,540.89 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX SVCS TO 12/18/20
50.28 SERVICE FOR TOLL FREE NUMBER TO 12/10/20 Check Total: 3,591.17 01/19/2021 AZO FITNESS 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 BALDANZI, ROSEMARY 40.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 2020 01/19/2021 BARBARA GRYGUTIS SCULPTURE LLC 30,000.00 ALL-ABILITIES PLAYGROUND PUBLIC ART 01/19/2021 BAY ALARM COMPANY 115.77 ALARM SERVICES HERITAGE PARK 01/19/2021 BFS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 15,681.40 FALLON SPORTS PARK DESIGN SVCS - PHASE 3 01/19/2021 BIG O'TIRES #7 216.61 POLICE VEHICLE TIRES & MAINTENANCE 01/19/2021 BKF ENGINEERS 2,108.50 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING STUDY DUBLIN BLVD
2,287.00 TASSAJARA RD GAP CLOSURE PROJECT Check Total: 4,395.50 01/19/2021 BROOKFIELD FILLMORE, LLC. 384,728.00 REFUND DUBLIN CROSSING TRANSPORTATION FEES 01/19/2021 BSK ASSOCIATES INC. 4,070.50 CONSTR INSPECTION/TESTING-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND 01/19/2021 BYOG 5,133.48 EMPLOYEE JACKETS 01/19/2021 CA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 5,430.50 HERITAGE PARK PERMIT APPLICATION FEE 01/19/2021 CA DEPT. OF TAX & FEE ADMIN 7,619.00 SALES & USE TAX RETURN CAL YR 2020 01/19/2021 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 22,176.05 MICROSOFT OFFICE & ADOBE ANNUAL LICENSES 01/19/2021 CENTENNIAL CAPITAL LLC 2,967.96 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 12,379.25 INVESTMENT CONSULTING SERVICES 01/19/2021 CHARGE POINT, INC. 3,638.00 EV CHARGE STATIONS-PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 01/19/2021 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC 4,471.29 CIVIC CENTER INTERNET SERVICE DEC 2020-JAN 2021 01/19/2021 COMCAST 2,300.00 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION INTERNET DEC 2020 27
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 5 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/19/2021 COMPASS EDUCATION INSTITUTE 2,157.78 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 CONTRACT SWEEPING SERVICES 26,539.59 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES DEC 2020 01/19/2021 CORWOOD CAR WASH, INC. 1,360.00 CITY VEHICLE CAR WASHES SEP-DEC 2020 01/19/2021 CPS HR CONSULTING 2,210.00 ONLINE EXAM FOR ENTRY LEVEL CLERICAL POSITION 01/19/2021 CSMFO 555.00 2021 DUES FOR FINANCE STAFF 01/19/2021 DISABILITY ACCESS DAC 33,280.00 ADA TRANSITION PLAN CONSULTING SERVICES 01/19/2021 DUBLIN CYCLERY 7,454.19 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 ECS IMAGING INC. 26,587.50 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE LICENSING & MAINTENANCE 01/19/2021 EISENHART, ALEX 35.00 REIMBURSE FINGERPRINTING FEE 01/19/2021 FEDEX 9.05 EXPRESS SHIPPING 01/19/2021 FERRIS, BRITTANY 16.39 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 2020 01/19/2021 GALLS, LLC 497.26 POLICE SUPPLIES 01/19/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. 2,006.56 LIGHTING EQUIPMENT 01/19/2021 HAIDER, AGHA S. 175.95 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT DEC 2020 01/19/2021 HD SUPPLY CONST & INDUSTRIAL 21.84 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 01/19/2021 IRON MOUNTAIN 261.30 ACAP RECORDS STORAGE JAN 2021
373.01 POLICE RECORDS STORAGE JAN 2021 Check Total: 634.31 01/19/2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC. INC. 18,989.98 PREPARE CEQA DOCS FOR EAST RANCH PROJECT 01/19/2021 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 1,887.50 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK & INSPECTIONS 01/19/2021 LANLOGIC INC. 3,589.00 INFORMATION SYSTEMS CONSULTING SVCS
1,050.00 MALWARE SOFTWARE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
425.00 NETWORK MONITORING SERVICES
21,657.74 SONICWALL HARDWARE Check Total: 26,721.74 01/19/2021 LENNAR HOMES 77,197.17 IMPACT FEE RIGHT TO REIMBURSEMENT 01/19/2021 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,515.00 EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS CORSORTIUM MEMBERSHIP 01/19/2021 LOGOBOSS 151.15 PROMOTIONAL PLAQUE - BLAYLOCK
589.29 SCARVES FOR INSIDE DUBLIN PARTICIPANTS Check Total: 740.44 01/19/2021 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 237.50 EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES 01/19/2021 MARKET TAVERN DUBLIN LP 4,689.87 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/19/2021 MILLER, YUVAL 1,800.00 ARBITRATION SERVICES 01/19/2021 MNS ENGINEERS, INC. 217.50 CONSTR MGMT/INSPECT- WATERSLIDE ANCHORAGE
392.50 CONSTR MGMT/INSPECT-SAN RAMON TRAIL LIGHTING
26,075.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - SEP 2020
72.50 EV CHARGING STATIONS PROJ MGMT/INSPECTION Check Total: 26,757.50 01/19/2021 MY JEEP CHRYSLER DODGE RAM 29,102.15 POLICE VEHICLE-2020 DODGE CHARGER D43 01/19/2021 NIELSEN, KERI 500.00 REFUND TEMPORARY USE PERMIT DEPOSIT 01/19/2021 NORM'S TOWING SERVICE, LLC 337.50 POLICE EVIDENCE TOW 01/19/2021 OFFICE TEAM 1,351.61 TEMPORARY CLERICAL SUPPORT 01/19/2021 PAKPOUR CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 11,059.50 DEC 2019 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1,062.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT-DON BIDDLE PARK
1,593.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT-IMAGINE PLAYGROUND Check Total: 13,714.50 01/19/2021 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 26,847.11 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE DEBT PMT OCT-DEC 2020 01/19/2021 PLEASANTON, CITY OF 24,000.00 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES 01/19/2021 PUBLIC BENEFIT TECHNOLOGY 220.00 CITY COUNCIL MEETING VIDEO SERVICES 28
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 6 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/19/2021 QUADIENT LEASING USA, INC. 98.16 POSTAGE MACHINE QUARTERLY LEASE FOR POLICE 01/19/2021 REDWOOD TOXICOLOGY LAB. INC. 657.00 FORENSIC DRUG AND ALCOHOL EXAMS 01/19/2021 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SVC INC 347.55 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS JAN 2021 01/19/2021 SHAMROCK OFFICE SOLUTIONS, LLC 1,910.99 COPIER CHARGES 01/19/2021 SICCAR LLC 98.00 REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE APP FEE 01/19/2021 SIMPLER SYSTEMS, INC 1,500.00 SIMPLER SOFTWARE LICENSING SUPPORT JAN 2021 01/19/2021 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 3,847.09 CARES COVID-19 PROGRAM GRANT 01/19/2021 STANFORD HEALTH -VALLEYCARE 105.00 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL SCREENING 01/19/2021 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 52,956.75 PROJ MGMT/INSPECT-CIVIC CTR HVAC/ROOF PROJECT 01/19/2021 T-MOBILE USA, INC. 504.21 CELL PHONE SERVICES DEC 2020 01/19/2021 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 2,788.08 INTERNET & PHONE SERVICES TO 12/8/2020 01/19/2021 TRC ENGINEERS, INC 12,437.73 2020 SLURRY SEAL PROJECT MGMT/INSPECT SVCS 01/19/2021 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 35,061.52 TRAFFIC SIGNAL/ STREET LIGHT MAINT NOV 2020 01/19/2021 TRI-VALLEY HAVEN, INC 14,285.67 CARES COVID-19 GRANT-SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD PRGM 01/19/2021 TRI-VALLEY JANITORIAL INC. 5,225.00 EXTRA JANITORIAL ELECTROSTATIC CLEANING
4,392.00 EXTRA JANITORIAL SERVICES JAN 2021
25,794.92 JANITORIAL SERVICES - CAMP PARKS JAN 2021
24,947.29 JANITORIAL SERVICES JAN 2021
2,480.29 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DEC 2020 Check Total: 62,839.50 01/19/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,748.46 POLICE SITCAM SERVICE TO 01/03/21 01/19/2021 WAHBEH, WILLIAM 115.00 PROFESSIONAL LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT 01/19/2021 WAKI, KATHERINE L. 3,446.00 ARBITRATION TRANSCRIPTION 01/19/2021 WARMINGTON RESIDENTIAL CA 12,174.00 IMPACT FEE RIGHT TO REIMBURSEMENT 01/19/2021 WC3-WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANT 5,636.25 PLAN CHECK SERVICES DEC 2020 01/19/2021 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROUP 440.00 PLAN REVIEW SERVICES-FALLON SPORTS PARK Payments Issued 1/19/2021 Total: 1,218,682.04
01/25/2021 4EVER DANCE STUDIO, LLC 623.81 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 4LEAF INC. 59,664.00 BLDG INSPECTION & PLAN CHECK SVCS DEC 2020 01/25/2021 ALOHA PARTNERS LLC 5,139.20 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 AMP PRINTING, INC. 48.88 BUSINESS CARDS 01/25/2021 APEX GRADING 700.00 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MAINT SVCS NOV 2020
18,800.00 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MAINT SVCS OCT 2020 Check Total: 19,500.00 01/25/2021 AQILA INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 ASCAP 371.26 PUBLIC PERFORMANCE MUSIC LICENSE FEE 01/25/2021 ASHG CAPITAL INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 BAGEL BAKERY OF DUBLIN 3,150.68 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 BAY AREA NEWS GROUP 189.00 PLANNING LEGAL NOTICES DEC 2020 01/25/2021 BRIGHT KIDS ACADEMY 7,838.88 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS 1,991.70 GREEN BUILDING FEES OCT-DEC 2020 01/25/2021 CALIFORNIA SPIRIT ELITE, INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 CARBONIC SERVICE 152.28 POOL CHEMICALS FOR THE WAVE 01/25/2021 CRESCENT BROW BAR 398.15 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 D'AMORE'S OF DUBLIN 5,888.72 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 8,367.32 SEISMIC HAZARD MAPPING FEE OCT-DEC 2020 01/25/2021 DIV OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 422.80 BUSINESS LICENSE ADMIN CASP FEE OCT-DEC 2020 01/25/2021 DSRSD 6,398.44 SERVICE TO 12/31/2020 01/25/2021 DUBLIN NAILS 3,773.30 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 29
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 7 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/25/2021 DUBLIN PLAZA DENTAL 8,720.81 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 DUTCHOVER & ASSOCIATES 967.50 LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK/INSPECTION SVCS DEC 2020 01/25/2021 EARL ANTHONY BOWLING, INC 6,036.35 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 EDGE GYMNASTICS TRAINING CTR. 2,746.95 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 EISENHART, ALEX 1,400.00 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 01/25/2021 ELEGANT & NATURAL KOSMETIK INC 2,784.10 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 ENGEO INC 1,760.00 FALLON CROSSING GHAD MANAGEMENT - NOV 2020
13,960.55 FALLON VILLAGE GHAD MANAGEMENT - NOV 2020
5,299.00 SCHAEFER RANCH GHAD MANAGEMENT - NOV 2020 Check Total: 21,019.55 01/25/2021 EVERBRIGHT HARVEST GROUP, LLC. 3,556.16 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 GALAXY EDUCATION CENTER 817.94 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 GAL-STAGE 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 HANA JAPAN STEAK HOUSE 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 IPERMIT 24.00 REFUND BUILDING PERMIT FEE 01/25/2021 JNG GROUP LLC 8,802.69 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 JUNG'S BBQ INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 KLUBER ASSOCIATES, INC 755.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - JUL 2020 01/25/2021 LEE'S SANDWICHES 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 LIVERMORE AUTO GROUP 3,594.80 POLICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 01/25/2021 LSA ASSOCIATES INC. 1,071.25 PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEC 2020 01/25/2021 MANAGEMENT PARTNERS INC. 332.50 EXECUTIVE COACHING SERVICES 01/25/2021 NEW AMADOR SPA LLC 4,204.16 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 PAMPERED NAILS AND SPA 1,240.04 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 PARKWAY BODY SHOP 7,855.06 POLICE VEHICLE REPAIR 01/25/2021 PERSIS RESTAURANTS INC. 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 PG&E 194.53 SERVICE TO 12/29/2020
699.05 SERVICE TO 01/03/2021
13,551.61 SERVICE TO 12/14/2020
132.40 SERVICE TO 12/28/2020
2,628.91 SERVICE TO 12/29/2020
7,662.38 SERVICE TO 12/30/2020
1,519.02 SERVICE TO 12/31/2020 Check Total: 26,387.90 01/25/2021 PHO SAIGON 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 POSITANO HOME & LANDSCAPING 1,273.73 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 QUETEL CORPORATION 1,574.00 ANNUAL TECHNICAL SUPPORT RENEWAL 01/25/2021 RAMEN 101 DUBLIN LLC 4,594.52 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 RISE DEVELOPMENT, LLC 8,180.39 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 SEED COLLABORATIVE, LLC 2,531.25 COMMUNITY TASK FORCE FACILITATION 01/25/2021 SELECT IMAGING 136.96 CITY COUNCIL DIAS NAME PLATES 01/25/2021 SHANMAN CORP. 7,176.49 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 SHIR MARTIAL ARTS 4,227.77 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 SONRISE ROOFING 98.00 REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE APP FEE 01/25/2021 SPECTRUM COMMUNITY SVCS INC. 1,094.60 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT DEC 2020 01/25/2021 SPRINGBOX LLC 10,000.00 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 STUDIO BLUE REPROGRAPHICS 1,018.64 MISSION/VISION STATEMENT POSTER UPDATE 01/25/2021 SUNBUSTERS PATIO COVER CO, INC 98.00 REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE APP FEE 01/25/2021 THE FIT POTATO, LLC 6,152.22 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM
30
Print Date: 02/01/2021 City of Dublin Page 8 of 8 Payment Issuance Report Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021
Date Issued Payee Amount Description 01/25/2021 TRB AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2,902.50 PLAN CHECK SERVICES DEC 2020 01/25/2021 TREASURER ALAMEDA COUNTY 3,885,847.09 DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES 08/23/20-10/31/20 01/25/2021 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORT. COUNCIL 313,908.46 TRI-VALLEY TRANSPORTATION FEES OCT-DEC 2020 01/25/2021 ZAC'S CAFE 3,919.37 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM 01/25/2021 ZHAO, DDS, HONG 5,185.01 RECOVERY BOOST GRANT PROGRAM Payments Issued 1/25/2021 Total: 4,576,154.18
01/26/2021 CA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 165.50 HERITAGE PARK PERMIT APPLICATION FEE Payments Issued 1/26/2021 Total: 165.50
Grand Total for Payments Dated 1/1/2021 through 1/31/2021: 8,689,791.75
Total Number of Payments Issued: 234
31 Agenda Item 4.3 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 16, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: Grants of Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard and Scarlett Court Prepared by: Laurie Sucgang, City Engineer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will consider granting a portion of City property as Dublin Boulevard public street right-of-way and a portion of the City of Dublin Maintenance Corporation Yard property as Scarlett Court public street right-of-way.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-18-3, and adopt the Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Scarlett Court over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-77-1.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund to effectuate the transfer of public property to public street right-of-way. Street improvements located in public street rights-of-way allow for use of transportation funding (i.e. gas tax, SB-1, etc.) for maintenance and repair of the street improvements. Improvements located on public property are not eligible for transportation funding.
DESCRIPTION:
There are portions of existing streets and associated improvements located outside of public street rights-of-way that Staff recommends be officially dedicated for the use and benefit of the public as a right-of-way for public street purposes over, under, along, and across the associated real property. Certain funding sources, such as Gas Tax, are restricted to use within public street rights-of-way, therefore officially dedicating the right-of-way for public street purposes will ensure compliance with such funding restrictions.
Dublin Boulevard Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (Zone 7) recently quitclaimed a
Page 1 of 2 32 portion of existing Zone 7 property to the City. The property containing the Line G-1 Chabot Canal, which runs in the middle of Scarlett Drive, south of Dublin Boulevard, extends north approximately forty feet into Dublin Boulevard street improvements. During review of permit applications, City and Zone 7 Staff worked to develop a quitclaim deed that would allow Zone 7 to transfer a portion of their property to the City of Dublin, while retaining an easement for Zone 7 equipment located on the headwall of the canal. The City will accept the quitclaim, thereby taking ownership of the subject property. Staff recommends the City Council grant a public street right- of-way for Dublin Boulevard over the property. There are existing street improvements located within the property, such as pavement and a crosswalk.
Scarlett Court An approximately 1,710-square-foot portion of the existing cul-de-sac bulb at the eastern end of Scarlett Court is located on the City’s property that contains the Maintenance Corporation Yard and the Alameda County Fire Department Vehicle Maintenance Facility. The cul-de-sac was constructed as part of the project that built the maintenance facilities. Staff recommends the City Council grant a public street right-of-way for Scarlett Court over the portion of property that contains existing pavement and sidewalk.
STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
None.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Dublin Boulevard over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-18-3 2) Exhibit A to the Resolution – Public Right-of-Way Dedication, Dublin Boulevard 3) Resolution Granting Public Right-of-Way for Scarlett Court over a Portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-77-1 4) Exhibit A to the Resolution – Public Right-of-Way Dedication, Scarlett Court
Page 2 of 2 33 Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. XX – 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
GRANTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DUBLIN BOULEVARD OVER PORTION OF ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 941-550-18-3
WHEREAS, on December 15, 2020, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District adopted District Resolution No. R-2020-548 quitclaiming to the City of Dublin, a portion of Assessor’s Parcel No. 941-550-18-3; and
WHEREAS, on December 24, 2020, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District executed the Quitclaim Deed conveying interest in the property to the City; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2021, the City Engineer, as authorized by City Council Resolution No. 24-87, accepted interest in the property conveyed by the Quitclaim Deed; and
WHEREAS, the property conveyed by the Quitclaim Deed contains existing Dublin Boulevard street improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to dedicate the property conveyed by the Quitclaim Deed as Dublin Boulevard public street right-of-way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin grants public right-of-way for Dublin Boulevard over a portion of Assessor Parcel Number 941-550-18- 3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the grant for public right-of-way dedication for Dublin Boulevard, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and make any necessary, non-substantive changes to carry out the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______Mayor ATTEST:
Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 1 of 2 34 Attachment 1
______City Clerk
Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 2 of 2 35 Attachment 2
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of Dublin
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568-0233
No Fee Required Government Code § 27383 APN: 941-550-18-3
Space Above This Line for Recorder’s Use
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION Dublin Boulevard
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $0.00 CITY TRANSFER TAX IS $0.00
This conveyance is exempt from the documentary transfer tax since a governmental agency is already possessed with real property interest, R & T 11922, and is granting an interest therein to the Public.
For valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation, as the undersigned GRANTOR and owner in fee of that certain real property located in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes of this dedication, does hereby dedicate for the use and benefit of the public as a right-of-way for public street purposes and incidents and appurtenances thereto, over, under, along and across all that real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California as described more specifically in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, and reserving therefrom the Zone 7 easement as described more specifically in Exhibit “A” attached hereto.
GRANTOR: City of Dublin
BY: ______Date: ______Linda Smith, City Manager
36 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION QUITCLAIM DEED & EASEMENT RESERVATION
3684396.1
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO. XX – 21
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN
GRANTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR SCARLETT COURT OVER A PORTION OF ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 941-550-77-1
WHEREAS, the City of Dublin owns the property located at 5777 Scarlett Court, Assessor’s Parcel No. 941-550-77-1, (“Property”); and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Property contains existing Scarlett Court street improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to dedicate a portion of the Property as Scarlett Court public street right-of-way.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin grants public right-of-way for Scarlett Court over a portion of the Property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the grant for public right-of-way dedication for Scarlett Court, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and make any necessary, non-substantive changes to carry out the intent of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______Mayor ATTEST:
______City Clerk
Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 1 of 1 46 Attachment 4
RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of Dublin
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk CITY OF DUBLIN 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568-0233
No Fee Required Government Code § 27383 APN: 941-550-77-1
Space Above This Line for Recorder’s Use
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION SCARLETT COURT
THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR DECLARES: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX IS $0.00 CITY TRANSFER TAX IS $0.00
This conveyance is exempt from the documentary transfer tax since a governmental agency is already possessed with real property interest, R & T 11922, and is granting an interest therein to the Public.
For valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of Dublin, a municipal corporation, as the undersigned GRANTOR and owner in fee of that certain real property located in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” (legal description) and Exhibit “B” (plat map), attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes of this dedication, does hereby dedicate for the use and benefit of the public as a right-of-way for public street purposes and incidents and appurtenances thereto, over, under, along and across all that real property situated in the City of Dublin, County of Alameda, State of California, more particularly described as follows:
GRANTOR: City of Dublin
BY: ______Date: ______Linda Smith, City Manager
47 Rev: November 19, 2020 Date: October 28, 2020 File: 1930001.01
EXHIBIT ‘A’ LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATE IN THE CITY OF DUBLIN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL “A” AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 1177, RECORDED IN BOOK 87 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 69, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, AND BEING THE LANDS OF CITY OF DUBLIN AS DESCRIBED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 2009-51538, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL “A” AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL “A”, NORTH 89°14’44” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 13.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 68°18’10” EAST;
THENCE ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.50 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 135°05’48” AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 107.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL “A”;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89°14’44” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 84.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ;
SAID DEDICATION AREA CONTAINING 1,710 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.
SEE EXHIBIT ‘B’ PLAT MAP ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF.
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED “PARCEL MAP 1177”, RECORDED IN BOOK 87 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 69, ALAMEDA COUNTY RECORDS.
Prepared by: CSW/STUBER-STROEH ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Josh Woelbing P.L.S. # 9387
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION.docx 48 Graphic Scale (in feet)
40 0
1 inch = 40 ft.
Rev. - Date: 11/19/2020 Job No. 1930001.01 Scale: 1" = 40' EXHIBIT B PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DUBLIN ALAMEDA CALIFORNIA P:\Projects\1930001.01 Scarlett Ct Vacation and Merger Investigation\DWG\Legal Descriptions and plats\SCARLETT CT public street right-of-way\PLAT - SCARLETT PUBLIC RW.dwg 11/19/2020 - 09:48 AM tetiana 1:1 49 Agenda Item 4.4 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL
DATE: February 16, 2021
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2020 Prepared by: Chris Rhoades, Financial Analyst
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The City Council will receive an informational report of the City’s investments through the quarter ending December 31, 2020 including a monthly transaction ledger. The City’s investment portfolio for this period totaled $327,123,861 (market value) with an average market yield of 0.28%. As required by the Policy, the City Treasurer (Administrative Services Director) affirms that the City is able to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Receive the City Treasurer's Informational Report of Investments for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2020.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
There is no financial impact resulting from this report. Investments are made in accordance with the City Investment Policy and State Law. Interest earned is apportioned between funds (i.e., General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, etc.) based upon their proportionate share of the total cash balance. Based on the financial needs of the City including the timing of revenues and expenditures, the quarterly cash balance can vary from quarter to quarter.
DESCRIPTION:
The total investment portfolio (market value) consists of $217,255,770 managed by Chandler Asset Management (Chandler), and $109,868,091 invested by the City in local government pools. The average market yield of the Chandler portfolio and the local pools was 0.27% and 0.30% respectively. The total investment portfolio balance fluctuates throughout the year due to normal cash flow needs and includes both discretionary and restricted funds.
Page 1 of 4 50 Economic Update Highlights The following are some highlights from the Economic Update included in the attached Investment Report prepared by Chandler (Attachment 1).
Recent economic data suggests that the economy has lost momentum as the number of virus cases has risen. Chandler believes the near-term outlook remains challenging as the labor market remains under pressure and many regions have continued business restrictions due to the virus. However, the passage of a new $900 billion COVID-19 fiscal relief bill should help cushion the economy over the next few months, and Chandler believes the new Presidential administration will have a keen focus on getting the economy back on track. Chandler also remains very optimistic about progress on vaccines and therapeutics, which could help fuel the economic recovery later this year. Chandler also expects the Fed’s highly accommodative monetary policy framework will continue to provide support for the financial markets.
City of Dublin Portfolio The City's aggregate portfolio has maintained a healthy balance of investment types with minimal change from the prior quarter as shown below in Chart 1.
Chart 1: Investments by Type September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2020
The market value of the City's portfolio increased by $22.3 million from the September 30, 2020 quarter. The quarterly increase was due to normal fluctuations in the timing of incoming revenue, predominantly the receipt of property tax allocations and sales tax revenue. The City’s portfolio increased $26.6 million from the same quarter the prior year due to the excess of revenues over expenditures trending on an annual basis (see Table 1 below). Overall market yield-to-maturity decreased from 0.34% to 0.28% (shown in Table 2) due to the factors discussed in the Economic Update Highlights. For detailed monthly transactions, see Attachment 2. It should be noted that the City is no longer required to differentiate between foreign and United States (US) based corporations for reporting purposes.
Page 2 of 4 51 Table 1: Portfolio Values and Yield to Maturity
December 31, 2019 September 30, 2020 December 31, 2020 Par Book Market % of % of Total Book Market Holdings Market Value Market Value Value Value Value Subtotal Portfolio Yield Yield Managed by City LAIF 49,367,486 50,069,345 50,189,403 50,189,403 50,189,403 45.7% 15.8% 0.52% 0.52% CAMP 42,618,198 37,890,432 59,605,094 59,605,094 59,605,094 54.3% 18.7% 0.12% 0.12% SUBTOTAL 91,985,684 87,959,776.47 109,794,497 109,794,497 109,794,497 100.00% 34.52% 0.30% 0.30% Accrued Interest 263,314 100,879.68 73,594 92,248,998 88,060,656.15 109,868,091 Managed by Chandler ABS 15,224,454 10,967,071 8,563,200 8,578,796 8,651,697 4.0% 2.7% 1.78% 0.30% Agency 67,108,075 86,962,937 85,040,000 85,455,777 88,099,396 40.7% 26.7% 1.61% 0.23% Commercial Paper1 4,115,091 - - - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% Foreign Corporate2 6,463,483 - - - - 0.0% 0.0% 0.00% 0.00% Money Market 337,867 287,330 1,494,033 1,494,033 1,494,033 0.7% 0.5% 0.01% 0.01% Supranational 4,520,176 6,901,940 9,160,000 9,130,259 9,291,429 4.3% 2.9% 1.38% 0.31% Corporate 43,978,777 48,948,015 46,535,000 46,916,144 49,090,006 22.7% 14.6% 2.50% 0.43% US Treasury 65,485,135 61,909,753 57,500,000 57,511,184 59,632,976 27.6% 18.1% 1.77% 0.18% SUBTOTAL 207,233,057 215,977,047 208,292,234 209,086,194 216,259,536 100.00% 65.48% 1.84% 0.27% Accrued Interest 996,435 822,822 996,234 208,229,491 216,799,869 217,255,770 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 300,478,490 304,860,526 318,086,730 318,880,691 327,123,861 100.00% 0.28% Change from Prior Year 26,645,371 1Commercial Paper reached maturity in April 2020 Change from Prior Quarter 22,263,335 2Reported in Corporate category, as of March 2020
Table 2: Quarterly Holdings (Market Value) by Type, and YTM, 5 Quarters
Holdings (Market Value) 12/31/19 3/31/20 6/30/20 9/30/20 12/31/20 LAIF/CAMP 91,985,684 86,625,886 102,457,734 87,959,776 109,794,497 ABS 15,224,454 13,963,788 10,752,557 10,967,071 8,651,697 Agency 67,108,075 73,363,097 78,621,769 86,962,937 88,099,396 Commercial Paper 4,115,091 4,134,975 - - - Foreign Corporate 6,463,483 - - - - Money Market 337,867 1,416,205 2,018,086 287,330 1,494,033 Negotiable CD - - - - - Supranational 4,520,176 4,626,095 6,913,320 6,901,940 9,291,429 Corporate 43,978,777 49,536,671 51,557,374 48,948,015 49,090,006 US Treasury 65,485,135 65,660,509 65,288,940 61,909,753 59,632,976 Accrued Interest 1,259,749 1,091,397 1,203,899 923,702 1,069,828 TOTAL 300,478,490 300,418,622 318,813,679 304,860,526 327,123,861 YIELD TO MATURITY 1.80% 1.11% 0.50% 0.34% 0.28%
Funds Managed by the City The City participates in two local agency investment pools managed by government finance professionals and treasurers: the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) and the California Asset Management Program (CAMP). The City typically holds $50.0 million in LAIF (the maximum allowable), with the balance of liquid funds invested with CAMP.
Page 3 of 4 52 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE:
Strategy 2, Objective D: Continue to maintain strong fiscal policies.
NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH:
The City Council Agenda was posted.
ATTACHMENTS:
1) City of Dublin Investment Report for Period Ending December 31, 2020 2) Transaction Ledger - October through December 2020
Page 4 of 4 53 Attachment 1
INVESTMENT REPORT
City of Dublin
Period Ending December 31, 2020
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com
54 Table of Contents As of December 31, 2020
SECTION 1 Economic Update
SECTION 2 Account Profile
SECTION 3 Consolidated Information
SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings
SECTION 5 Transactions
1 55 SECTION | Section 1 | Economic Update
2 56 Economic Update
. Recent economic data suggests that the economy has lost momentum as virus cases have risen. We anticipated that economic data would soften during the winter months, and believe the near-term outlook remains challenging as the labor market remains under pressure and many regions have renewed business restrictions due to the virus. However, the passage of a new $900 billion COVID-19 fiscal relief bill should help cushion the economy over the next few months, and we believe the incoming Presidential administration will have a keen focus on getting the economy back on track. We also remain very optimistic about progress on vaccines. A limited number of vaccine doses have already been distributed, and we expect more widespread distribution in the second and third quarter of 2021. We believe the distribution of vaccines and therapeutics will help fuel the economic recovery later this year. We also expect the Fed’s highly accommodative monetary policy framework will continue to provide support for the financial markets. . The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kept monetary policy unchanged at their December meeting as expected, with the fed funds target rate in a range of 0.0% to 0.25%. The Fed intends to remain highly accommodative until their goals of maximum employment and higher inflation are achieved. The Fed’s summary of economic projections continues to signal that the target fed funds rate will remain unchanged until at least 2023, as policymakers do not expect inflation to exceed 2.0% during that timeframe. Until the Fed has made substantial progress toward achieving their dual mandate of maximum employment and price stability, they have set a floor for monthly asset purchases of at least $80 billion per month of Treasuries and $40 billion per month of agency mortgage-backed securities. Notably, the Fed's outlook for GDP over the next few years was revised higher and the outlook for unemployment was revised lower compared with their previous forecasts in September, which suggests increased optimism. Nevertheless, the outlook remains uncertain and Fed Chair Powell indicated that the Fed would increase policy accommodation further if progress toward their dual mandate slows. . In 2020, the yield on 2-year Treasuries was down 145 basis points to 0.12% and the yield on 10-year Treasuries was down about 100 basis points to 0.91%. The yield curve steepened modestly in December and month-to-date the yield curve has continued to steepen, likely due in part to favorable developments on the vaccine front. Month-to-date, the yield on 2-year Treasuries is little changed but the yield on 10-year Treasuries is up about 20 basis points. We believe the Treasury yield curve is poised to steepen modestly further in 2021 as the economy reopens, driven by an increase in longer-term rates as the front end of the curve is likely to remain anchored near 0.0%.
3 57 Employment
Nonfarm Payroll (000's) Unemployment Rate 10,000 28.0% Underemployment Rate (U6) 6,000 24.0% Unemployment Rate (U3) 2,000 20.0% -2,000 16.0% -6,000 Rate (%) 12.0% -10,000 8.0% MOM Change In (000's) In Change MOM -14,000 Non-farm Payroll (000's) -18,000 3 month average (000's) 4.0% -22,000 0.0%
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor
U.S. nonfarm payrolls declined by 140,000 in December. It was the first monthly decline in nonfarm payrolls since April of last year and came in well below expectations for a 50,000 gain. The monthly decline was led by the leisure and hospitality sector which experienced a 498,000 net decline in payrolls in December, along with modest declines in government jobs and education and health services. The unemployment rate was unchanged in December at 6.7% and has improved significantly from the peak of 14.8% last April. Nevertheless, more than 10.7 million people remain unemployed. Workers who classified themselves as employed but absent from work in December continued to understate the unemployment rate by about 0.6%. The U-6 underemployment rate, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons, remained high but declined to 11.7% in December from 12.0% in November. The labor participation rate was unchanged at 61.5% in December and remains well below pre-pandemic levels.
4 58 Initial Claims for Unemployment Initial Claims For Unemployment October 02, 2020 - January 01, 2021
25,000 Initial Jobless Claims Continuing Claims
20,000
15,000 9,398 8,472 7,823 7,222 6,798 10,000 6,370 6,089 5,507 5,322 5,198 5,527 5,781 5,072 In thousands In
5,000
842 892 767 797 758 757 711 748 787 716 862 806 790 787 -
Source: US Department of Labor
In the most recent week, the number of initial jobless claims decreased to 787,000 compared to 790,000 in the prior week. The level of continuing unemployment claims (where the data is lagged by one week) decreased to about 5.1 million from roughly 5.2 million in the prior week. Although jobless claims have declined from the early stage of the pandemic, they have remained well above the 2019 average of 1.7 million. Given the resurgence of the virus and renewed lockdown measures, we believe the labor market is likely to remain under pressure over the near term.
5 59 Inflation
Consumer Price Index (CPI) Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) 3.0% 3.0% PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change 2.5% 2.5% PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change
2.0% 2.0%
1.5% 1.5% YOY( %) Change 1.0% YOY( %) Change 1.0%
0.5% CPI YOY % Change 0.5% Core CPI YOY % Change 0.0% 0.0%
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) was up 1.2% year-over-year in November, unchanged from October. Core CPI (CPI less food and energy) was up 1.6% year-over-year in November, also unchanged from October. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index was up 1.1% year-over- year in November, versus up 1.2% year-over-year in October. Core PCE, which is the Fed's primary inflation gauge, was up 1.4% year-over-year in November, unchanged from October. Inflation remains below the Fed's target.
6 60 Consumer
Retail Sales YOY % Change Consumer Confidence 10.0% 150
5.0% 140
0.0% 130
-5.0% 120
-10.0% 110 YOY (%) Change -15.0% Level Index 100
-20.0% 90
-25.0% 80
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board
Consumer spending trends softened in November. On a year-over-year basis, retail sales were up 4.1% in November versus 5.5% in October. On a month-over-month basis, retail sales declined 1.1% in November, with broad-based declines in many categories on a seasonally adjusted basis. Excluding vehicles and gas, retail sales fell 0.8% in November, following a 0.1% decline in October. Notably, retail sales makes up roughly one third of the personal consumption expenditures component of US gross domestic product (GDP), while services revenue comprises roughly two thirds. Spending on services has been hit particularly hard by the pandemic and lagged the pick-up in overall third quarter GDP. While retail sales remain higher on a year-over-year basis, we believe this has been partially boosted by the contraction in spending on services. The Consumer Confidence index declined to 88.6 in December from 92.9 in November. The index is well below pre-pandemic levels at the start of this year.
7 61 Economic Activity
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI) Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) 6.0% 6.00
4.0% 4.00
2.0% 2.00
0.0% 0.00
-2.0% -2.00 3 Month Average MOMChange ( %) -4.0% -4.00
-6.0% -6.00
-8.0% -8.00
Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) rose 0.6% in November (following a 0.8% increase in October) but remained down 2.2% year-over-year. According to the Conference Board, a decelerating pace of improvement in the LEI in recent months suggests that economic growth has moderated heading into 2021. Furthermore, the Conference Board warns of potential downside risks to economic growth from a second wave of the virus and high unemployment. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) declined to 0.27 in November from 1.01 in October. On a 3-month moving average basis, the CFNAI declined to 0.56 in November from 0.85 in October. The index slipped on a one month and 3-month basis, but a positive index reading corresponds to above trend growth.
8 62 Housing
Housing Starts S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index 2000 Multi Family Housing Starts 10.0% 1800 Single Family Housing Starts 9.0% 1600 8.0% 1400 7.0% 1200 6.0% 1000 5.0% 800 4.0%
600 YOY( %) Change 3.0% 400 2.0% 200 1.0% MOM Change (In Thousands Units) Thousands (In of Change MOM 0 0.0%
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
Total housing starts increased 1.2% in November to an annual pace of 1,547,000. Single family starts inched up 0.4% to a very strong annualized rate of 1,186,000, while multi-family starts increased 4.0% to an annualized rate of 361,000. On a year-over-year basis, total housing starts were up 12.8% in November, driven by growth in single-family starts. Meanwhile, permits were up 6.2% on a month-over-month basis in November, to an annualized rate of 1,639,000 (the strongest rate since 2006). According to the Case-Shiller 20-City home price index, home prices were up 7.9% year-over-year in October versus up 6.6% year-over-year in September. The housing market has been an area of strength during the pandemic. Very low mortgage rates, solid stock market performance, and a meaningful shift toward working from home are providing strong tailwinds for the housing sector.
9 63 Manufacturing
Institute of Supply Management Purchasing Manager Industrial Production Index 62 8.0% 60 EXPANDING 4.0% 58 56 0.0% 54 52 -4.0% 50 -8.0%
48 YOY( %) Change 46 -12.0% 44 CONTRACTING -16.0% 42 40 -20.0%
Source: Institute for Supply Management Source: Federal Reserve
The Institute yfor Suppl Management (ISM) manufacturing index increased to 60.7 in December from 57.5 in November. Readings above 50.0 are indicative of expansion in the manufacturing sector. We believe a weakening US dollar has been supportive of the US manufacturing sector throughout the pandemic. The Industrial Production index was down 5.5% year-over-year in November, versus down 5.0% in October. On a month-over-month basis, the Industrial Production index increased 0.4% in November, following a 0.9% increase in October. Capacity Utilization increased to 73.3% in November from 73.0% in October, but remains well below the long-run average of 79.8%. Overall manufacturing conditions have improved since the deep contraction in activity earlier this year, but industrial production remains lower on a year-over-year basis.
10 64 Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Components of GDP 12/19 3/20 6/20 9/20 40.0% 30.0% Personal Consumption Expenditures 1.1% -4.8% -24.0% 25.4% 20.0% Gross Private Domestic Investment -0.6% -1.6% -8.8% 12.0% 10.0% 0.0% Net Exports and Imports 1.5%1.1% 0.6% -3.2% -10.0%
Federal Government Expenditures 0.3% 0.1% 1.2% -0.4% -20.0% GDP QOQ % Change GDP YOY % Change State and Local (Consumption and -30.0% 0.2% 0.1% -0.4% -0.4% Gross Investment) -40.0% Total 2.4% -5.0% -31.4% 33.4%
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce
According to the third estimate, real US gross domestic product (GDP) grew at an annualized rate of 33.4% in the third quarter (up slightly from the advance and second estimates), following a 31.4% annualized decline in the second quarter. Third quarter GDP growth was by far the largest annualized gain on record but followed the largest annualized decline in GDP on record in the second quarter. Personal consumption expenditures rebounded in the third quarter and was by far the biggest contributor to third quarter GDP growth. The consensus estimate for fourth quarter 2020 GDP growth is 4.6%. The consensus forecast for US gross domestic product growth in 2021 is 4.0%, following an expected 3.5% decline in 2020.
11 65 Federal Reserve
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets Effective Federal Funds Rate 8,000,000 3.00% 7,500,000 2.50% 7,000,000 6,500,000 2.00% 6,000,000 1.50% $ millions 5,500,000 Yield (%) In 5,000,000 1.00% 4,500,000 0.50% 4,000,000 3,500,000 0.00%
Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
The Fed has taken a wide range of aggressive actions to help stabilize and provide liquidity to the financial markets. The Fed has lowered the fed funds target rate to a range of 0.0%-0.25% and continues to purchase Treasury and agency mortgage-backed securities to support smooth market functioning. Earlier this year, policymakers reinstated the Commercial Paper Funding Facility and Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility. The Fed also established the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility, Main Street Lending Facility, and Municipal Liquidity Facility. The Fed has also provided short-term funding through large-scale repo operations and lowered the reserve requirement for depository institutions. Notably, many of the Fed's lending facilities are set to expire at the end of this year, including the Fed’s corporate credit, asset-backed securities, municipal lending, and Main Street Lending programs. The Fed will return the unused funds currently earmarked for those facilities to the Treasury.
12 66 Bond Yields
US Treasury Note Yields US Treasury Yield Curve 3.5% 3.5%
3.0% 2-Year 3.0% Dec-20 5-Year Sep-20 2.5% 10-Year 2.5% Dec-19
2.0% 2.0%
Yield (%) 1.5% Yield (%) 1.5%
1.0% 1.0%
0.5% 0.5%
0.0% 0.0%
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg
Treasury yields were much lower on a year-over-year basis at 2020 year-end. The 3-month T-bill yield was down 149 basis points, the 2-year Treasury yield was down 145 basis points, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was down 100 basis points, year-over-year. Yields declined precipitously in March 2020, with the Fed cutting rates by a total of 150 basis points and a flight to safe-haven assets driving down yields across the curve. The Fed has signaled plans to keep the front end of the Treasury yield curve anchored near zero for at least the next few years.
13 67 SECTION | Section 2|2 | Account Profile
14 68 Objectives As of December 31, 2020
Investment Objectives The investment objectives of the City of Dublin are first, to provide safety of principal; second, to provide adequate liquidity to meet all requirements which might be reasonably anticipated; third, to attain a market average rate of return on its investments throughout economic cycles; and fourth, to be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions.
Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective The performance objective of the City of Dublin is to earn a return that equals or exceeds the return on of the ICE BAML 1-5 Year Treasury and Agency Index.
Strategy In order to achieve this objective, the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income instruments consistent with the City's investment policy and California Government Code.
15 69 Compliance As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin
Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy.
Category Standard Comment
U.S. Treasury Issues No limitations; Full faith and credit of the U.S. are pledged for payment of principal and interest. Complies 35% max per agency issuer; 25% max callables for agency securities; Federal Agencies or U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises Federal Agencies (GSE), participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal Complies agencies or U.S. GSEs. "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 5% max per issuer; Obligations of the State of California, any of the other 49 states, or any local Municipal Securities Complies agency within the state of California; "AA" rating category or better by a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization ("NRSRO"); 30% maximum; 10% max per issuer; U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the Supranational Securities Complies International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("IBRD"), the International Finance Corporation ("IFC") or the Inter- American Development Bank ("IADB") Asset-Backed Securities/Mortgage- Backed Securities/ Collateralized "AA" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 20% maximum (combined); 5% max per issuer Complies Mortgage Obligations "A" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. Corporate Medium Term Notes Complies or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S. "A" long-term debt rated and/or "A-1" short-term rated or higher by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in NCDs with any one financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution; Issued by a Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Complies nationally or state-chartered bank, a savings association or a federal association, a state or federal credit union, or by a state- licensed branch of a foreign bank. Time Deposits/ Certificates of Deposit 10% maximum; Collateralized/FDIC Insured; 1 year max maturity Complies "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 10% max of the outstanding commercial paper of an issuing corporation; 20% max amount invested in CP of any one issuer in combination with any other debt from that issuer; 270 days max maturity; Issuer of the commercial paper shall meet all conditions in either A) (1) Organized and operating in the U.S. as a general Commercial Paper Complies corp, (2) Has AUM > $500 million, (3) "A" rated issuer debt (if any) or higher by a NRSRO; or B) (1) Organized in the U.S. as a special purpose corp, trust, LLC, (2) Has program wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, LOC, or surety bond, (3) "A-1" rated or higher by a NRSRO
"A-1" short-term rated or higher by a NRSRO; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 20% max amount invested in BA with any one Banker’s Acceptances Complies financial institution in combination with any other debt from that financial institution; 180 days max maturity Highest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience > 5 years; 20% Money Market Mutual Funds and maximum in Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual Funds; 20% max in Money Market Mutual Fund; 10% max per one Mutual Complies Mutual Funds Fund Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Maximum permitted by LAIF; Not used by investment adviser Complies California Asset Management Program Issued by joint powers authority organized pursuant to California Government Code; Not used by investment adviser Complies (CAMP) Inverse floaters; Ranges notes, Mortgage-derived, Interest-only strips; Any investment in a security not specifically listed as an Prohibited Securities Complies Authorized and Suitable Investment in the policy. 5% max per issuer, except US Government, its Agencies and instrumentalities (including agency backed-mortgage pools), Max Per Issuer Complies Supranational securities, or Money Market Mutual Funds Maximum Maturity 5 years, unless otherwise stated in the policy Complies 16 70 Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin
12/31/2020 9/30/2020 Benchmark* Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs) 2.64 2.66 2.70 Average Modified Duration 2.57 2.49 2.50 Average Purchase Yield n/a 1.82% 1.92% Average Market Yield 0.18% 0.27% 0.29% Average Quality** AAA AA/Aa1 AA/Aa1 Total Market Value 217,255,771 216,799,869 *ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury/Agency Index **Benchmark is a blended rating of S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch. Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively.
17 71 Sector Distribution As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin
December 31, 2020 September 30, 2020
ABS ABS 4.0% 5.1% US Treasury US Treasury 28.7% 27.5%
Supranational Supranational 4.3% 3.2% Agency Agency 40.7% 40.3% Money Market Money Market Fund FI Fund FI 0.7% 0.1%
Corporate Corporate 22.8% 22.7%
18 72 Issuers As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin – Account #10198
Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio Government of United States US Treasury 27.55% Federal National Mortgage Association Agency 17.32% Federal Home Loan Bank Agency 13.83% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency 6.44% Federal Farm Credit Bank Agency 3.14% Intl Bank Recon and Development Supranational 3.11% US Bancorp Corporate 1.76% JP Morgan Chase & Co Corporate 1.51% Apple Inc Corporate 1.49% Royal Bank of Canada Corporate 1.24% Honda Motor Corporation Corporate 1.24% Honeywell Corp Corporate 1.19% Bank of America Corp Corporate 1.19% Inter-American Dev Bank Supranational 1.19% Toronto Dominion Holdings Corporate 1.16% Honda ABS ABS 1.14% Nissan ABS ABS 1.10% PNC Financial Services Group Corporate 1.09% Toyota ABS ABS 1.04% Chubb Corporation Corporate 1.02% IBM Corp Corporate 0.99% Charles Schwab Corp/The Corporate 0.97% ChevronTexaco Corp Corporate 0.95% Berkshire Hathaway Corporate 0.91% Microsoft Corporate 0.86% Deere & Company Corporate 0.84% State Street Bank Corporate 0.84% Exxon Mobil Corp Corporate 0.84% John Deere ABS ABS 0.71% First American Govt Oblig Fund Money Market Fund FI 0.69% Wal-Mart Stores Corporate 0.68% Bank of New York Corporate 0.60% General Dynamics Corp Corporate 0.53% Oracle Corp Corporate 0.47% Merck & Company Corporate 0.36%
TOTAL 100.00%
19 73 Quality Distribution As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin December 31, 2020 vs. September 30, 2020
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0% AAA AA A AAA AA A 12/31/20 7.9% 72.8% 15.4% 0.0% 4.0% 09/30/20 6.9% 73.4% 15.3% 0.0% 4.4% Source: S&P Ratings 20 74 Duration Distribution As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Portfolio Compared to the Benchmark as of December 31, 2020 40.0% 35.0% 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury/Agency Index 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ Portfolio 6.2% 4.0% 8.6% 17.9% 24.9% 23.0% 15.5% 0.0% Benchmark* 0.3% 0.2% 2.0% 33.4% 29.3% 18.8% 16.0% 0.0% *ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury/Agency Index 21 75 Investment Performance As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Total Rate of Return Annualized Since Inception 10/31/2013 5.00% 4.50% 4.00% 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Since Inception City of Dublin ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index Annualized Since TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 3 months 12 months 2 years 3 years 5 years 10 years Inception City of Dublin 0.21% 4.34% 4.47% 3.46% 2.54% N/A 2.01% ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury/Agency Index 0.03% 4.23% 4.20% 3.31% 2.33% N/A 1.84% *ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index to 12/31/2014 Total rate of return:A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio. 22 76 Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account 12/31/2020 9/30/2020 Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs) 0.00 0.00 Modified Duration 0.00 0.00 Average Purchase Yield 0.30% 0.48% Average Market Yield 0.30% 0.48% Average Quality* AAA/NR AAA/NR Total Market Value 109,868,091 88,060,656 *Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively. 23 77 Sector Distribution As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account December 31, 2020 September 30, 2020 Local Gov Investment Pool 43.0% Local Gov Investment Pool LAIF 54.3% 45.7% LAIF 57.0% 24 78 Issuers As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account – Account #10219 Issue Name Investment Type % Portfolio CAMP Local Gov Investment Pool 54.25% Local Agency Investment Fund LAIF 45.75% TOTAL 100.00% 25 79 SECTION | Section 3 | Consolidated Information 26 80 Portfolio Characteristics As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Consolidated 12/31/2020 9/30/2020 Portfolio Portfolio Average Maturity (yrs) 1.76 1.92 Modified Duration 1.65 1.78 Average Purchase Yield 1.30% 1.50% Average Market Yield 0.28% 0.35% Average Quality* AA+/Aa1 AA+/Aa1 Total Market Value 327,123,861 304,860,526 * Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s respectively. 27 81 Sector Distribution As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Consolidated December 31, 2020 September 30, 2020 ABS US Treasury ABS 2.6% US Treasury 18.3% 3.6% 20.4% Supranational Agency 2.9% Supranational 27.1% 2.3% Money Market Money Market Fund FI Fund FI Agency 0.5% 0.1% 28.6% Local Gov Local Gov Investment Pool Investment Pool 12.4% 18.2% Corporate LAIF 15.1% 16.5% Corporate LAIF 16.2% 15.4% 28 82 SECTION | Section 4 | Portfolio Holdings 29 83 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration ABS 43815NAB0 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 A2 496,190.60 08/20/2019 496,155.87 100.36 497,965.10 0.23% Aaa / AAA 1.29 1.900% Due 04/15/2022 1.91% 496,184.55 0.32% 419.01 1,780.55 NR 0.23 47788CAC6 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 63,721.49 02/21/2018 63,716.91 100.25 63,881.43 0.03% Aaa / NR 1.30 2.660% Due 04/18/2022 2.68% 63,720.06 0.44% 75.33 161.37 AAA 0.12 477870AB5 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 220,510.30 07/16/2019 220,509.47 100.20 220,958.20 0.10% Aaa / NR 1.37 2.280% Due 05/16/2022 2.29% 220,509.90 0.30% 223.45 448.30 AAA 0.11 43814UAG4 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 A3 225,094.41 05/22/2018 225,089.50 100.83 226,971.02 0.10% NR / AAA 1.38 3.010% Due 05/18/2022 2.17% 225,092.71 0.33% 244.67 1,878.31 AAA 0.31 43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 A3 613,764.71 08/21/2018 613,680.50 101.18 621,034.77 0.29% Aaa / NR 1.64 2.950% Due 08/22/2022 2.55% 613,730.10 0.17% 502.95 7,304.67 AAA 0.43 47788EAC2 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 734,601.21 07/18/2018 734,545.54 101.01 742,050.79 0.34% Aaa / NR 1.87 3.080% Due 11/15/2022 3.10% 734,577.05 0.20% 1,005.59 7,473.74 AAA 0.35 65479GAD1 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B A3 761,738.19 07/17/2018 761,713.51 101.37 772,200.66 0.36% Aaa / AAA 2.20 3.060% Due 03/15/2023 3.08% 761,730.41 0.42% 1,035.96 10,470.25 NR 0.52 89231PAD0 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D A3 1,207,579.22 08/29/2019 1,233,381.79 101.63 1,227,265.18 0.57% Aaa / AAA 2.20 3.180% Due 03/15/2023 2.20% 1,223,603.55 0.22% 1,706.71 3,661.63 NR 0.55 65479JAD5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C A3 1,580,000.00 10/16/2019 1,579,916.58 102.04 1,612,224.10 0.74% Aaa / AAA 3.54 1.930% Due 07/15/2024 1.94% 1,579,937.64 0.43% 1,355.29 32,286.46 NR 1.35 89237VAB5 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C A3 1,025,000.00 07/21/2020 1,024,921.08 100.35 1,028,595.70 0.47% Aaa / AAA 3.79 0.440% Due 10/15/2024 0.44% 1,024,929.17 0.23% 200.44 3,666.53 NR 1.66 43813KAC6 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 A3 1,120,000.00 09/22/2020 1,119,835.47 100.17 1,121,893.92 0.52% NR / AAA 3.80 0.370% Due 10/18/2024 0.38% 1,119,848.98 0.29% 149.64 2,044.94 AAA 2.01 47787NAC3 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3 515,000.00 07/14/2020 514,921.51 100.32 516,655.73 0.24% Aaa / NR 3.88 0.510% Due 11/15/2024 0.52% 514,931.57 0.34% 116.73 1,724.16 AAA 1.87 8,588,387.73 8,651,696.60 3.99% Aaa / AAA 2.78 TOTAL ABS 8,563,200.13 1.78% 8,578,795.69 0.30% 7,035.77 72,900.91 Aaa 1.03 Agency 3130A7CV5 FHLB Note 3,470,000.00 Various 3,457,221.20 100.16 3,475,423.61 1.61% Aaa / AA+ 0.13 1.375% Due 02/18/2021 1.45% 3,469,662.54 0.18% 17,627.12 5,761.07 AAA 0.13 3135G0J20 FNMA Note 5,000,000.00 Various 5,018,675.00 100.18 5,009,215.00 2.32% Aaa / AA+ 0.16 1.375% Due 02/26/2021 1.29% 5,000,622.40 0.17% 23,871.52 8,592.60 AAA 0.15 313379RB7 FHLB Note 3,000,000.00 08/30/2017 3,022,620.00 100.75 3,022,572.00 1.39% Aaa / AA+ 0.44 1.875% Due 06/11/2021 1.67% 3,002,639.00 0.18% 3,125.00 19,933.00 AAA 0.44 30 84 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 3130A8QS5 FHLB Note 2,500,000.00 07/25/2016 2,481,475.00 100.54 2,513,422.50 1.16% Aaa / AA+ 0.53 1.125% Due 07/14/2021 1.28% 2,498,018.83 0.12% 13,046.88 15,403.67 AAA 0.53 3137EAEC9 FHLMC Note 3,000,000.00 Various 2,971,215.00 100.61 3,018,417.00 1.40% Aaa / AA+ 0.61 1.125% Due 08/12/2021 1.33% 2,996,433.81 0.12% 13,031.26 21,983.19 AAA 0.61 3135G0Q89 FNMA Note 2,000,000.00 10/06/2016 1,992,924.00 100.95 2,019,082.00 0.93% Aaa / AA+ 0.77 1.375% Due 10/07/2021 1.45% 1,998,918.84 0.13% 6,416.67 20,163.16 AAA 0.76 3135G0S38 FNMA Note 2,500,000.00 01/30/2017 2,495,475.00 101.90 2,547,575.00 1.18% Aaa / AA+ 1.01 2.000% Due 01/05/2022 2.04% 2,499,072.38 0.12% 24,444.44 48,502.62 AAA 1.00 313378CR0 FHLB Note 2,000,000.00 06/19/2017 2,035,280.00 102.53 2,050,648.00 0.95% Aaa / AA+ 1.19 2.250% Due 03/11/2022 1.86% 2,008,876.24 0.13% 13,750.00 41,771.76 NR 1.18 3135G0T45 FNMA Note 3,250,000.00 05/05/2017 3,232,125.00 102.21 3,321,825.00 1.54% Aaa / AA+ 1.26 1.875% Due 04/05/2022 1.99% 3,245,424.08 0.12% 14,557.29 76,400.92 AAA 1.25 3135G0T94 FNMA Note 2,500,000.00 03/28/2018 2,463,675.00 104.58 2,614,502.50 1.22% Aaa / AA+ 2.05 2.375% Due 01/19/2023 2.70% 2,484,535.52 0.14% 26,718.75 129,966.98 AAA 1.99 313383QR5 FHLB Note 1,500,000.00 08/28/2018 1,525,005.00 107.40 1,611,054.00 0.74% Aaa / AA+ 2.44 3.250% Due 06/09/2023 2.87% 1,512,738.94 0.21% 2,979.17 98,315.06 NR 2.36 3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note 2,000,000.00 07/16/2018 1,988,360.00 106.32 2,126,342.00 0.98% Aaa / AA+ 2.47 2.750% Due 06/19/2023 2.88% 1,994,180.00 0.18% 1,833.33 132,162.00 AAA 2.40 3135G05G4 FNMA Note 2,350,000.00 07/08/2020 2,344,947.50 100.24 2,355,611.80 1.09% Aaa / AA+ 2.52 0.250% Due 07/10/2023 0.32% 2,345,754.98 0.16% 2,790.63 9,856.82 AAA 2.51 3133EKZK5 FFCB Note 4,000,000.00 08/26/2019 4,009,000.00 103.57 4,142,976.00 1.92% Aaa / AA+ 2.62 1.600% Due 08/14/2023 1.54% 4,005,935.77 0.23% 24,355.56 137,040.23 AAA 2.56 313383YJ4 FHLB Note 5,000,000.00 Various 5,102,615.00 108.55 5,427,645.00 2.52% Aaa / AA+ 2.69 3.375% Due 09/08/2023 2.90% 5,058,606.18 0.18% 52,968.76 369,038.82 NR 2.57 3130A0F70 FHLB Note 5,000,000.00 Various 5,147,870.00 109.25 5,462,620.00 2.52% Aaa / AA+ 2.94 3.375% Due 12/08/2023 2.73% 5,088,166.34 0.21% 10,781.25 374,453.66 AAA 2.82 3135G0V34 FNMA Note 2,000,000.00 02/27/2019 1,992,340.00 107.11 2,142,128.00 1.00% Aaa / AA+ 3.10 2.500% Due 02/05/2024 2.58% 1,995,199.22 0.20% 20,277.78 146,928.78 AAA 2.97 3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note 3,795,000.00 Various 3,958,639.85 109.16 4,142,511.95 1.91% Aaa / AA+ 3.45 2.875% Due 06/14/2024 1.96% 3,908,102.81 0.21% 5,152.24 234,409.14 NR 3.31 3133EKWV4 FFCB Note 2,500,000.00 08/13/2019 2,524,140.00 105.60 2,639,910.00 1.22% Aaa / AA+ 3.57 1.850% Due 07/26/2024 1.65% 2,517,384.00 0.27% 19,913.19 122,526.00 AAA 3.44 3130A2UW4 FHLB Note 2,000,000.00 10/10/2019 2,122,020.00 109.67 2,193,366.00 1.02% Aaa / AA+ 3.70 2.875% Due 09/13/2024 1.58% 2,091,633.70 0.25% 17,250.00 101,732.30 AAA 3.51 3135G0W66 FNMA Note 2,000,000.00 11/08/2019 1,983,400.00 105.41 2,108,266.00 0.97% Aaa / AA+ 3.79 1.625% Due 10/15/2024 1.80% 1,987,238.58 0.19% 6,861.11 121,027.42 AAA 3.68 31 85 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 3135G0X24 FNMA Note 4,200,000.00 Various 4,287,898.80 105.38 4,425,825.60 2.05% Aaa / AA+ 4.02 1.625% Due 01/07/2025 1.18% 4,273,017.34 0.28% 32,987.50 152,808.26 AAA 3.87 3137EAEP0 FHLMC Note 4,200,000.00 Various 4,254,786.30 104.90 4,405,917.60 2.04% Aaa / NR 4.12 1.500% Due 02/12/2025 1.23% 4,245,636.10 0.30% 24,325.00 160,281.50 AAA 3.98 3135G03U5 FNMA Note 1,825,000.00 04/22/2020 1,821,240.50 101.18 1,846,452.88 0.85% Aaa / AA+ 4.31 0.625% Due 04/22/2025 0.67% 1,821,759.90 0.35% 2,186.20 24,692.98 AAA 4.25 3135G04Z3 FNMA Note 3,435,000.00 06/17/2020 3,427,889.55 100.53 3,453,222.68 1.59% Aaa / AA+ 4.46 0.500% Due 06/17/2025 0.54% 3,428,653.61 0.38% 667.92 24,569.07 AAA 4.41 3137EAEU9 FHLMC Note 1,745,000.00 07/21/2020 1,736,309.90 100.05 1,745,921.36 0.80% Aaa / AA+ 4.56 0.375% Due 07/21/2025 0.48% 1,737,081.72 0.36% 2,871.98 8,839.64 AAA 4.51 3135G05X7 FNMA Note 2,755,000.00 08/25/2020 2,742,106.60 99.98 2,754,396.66 1.27% Aaa / AA+ 4.65 0.375% Due 08/25/2025 0.47% 2,743,004.33 0.38% 3,558.54 11,392.33 AAA 4.60 3137EAEX3 FHLMC Note 2,655,000.00 09/23/2020 2,647,008.45 99.83 2,650,582.08 1.22% Aaa / AA+ 4.73 0.375% Due 09/23/2025 0.44% 2,647,437.82 0.41% 2,655.00 3,144.26 AAA 4.68 3135G06G3 FNMA Note 2,860,000.00 11/09/2020 2,849,761.20 100.42 2,871,963.38 1.32% Aaa / AA+ 4.85 0.500% Due 11/07/2025 0.57% 2,850,042.33 0.41% 1,946.39 21,921.05 AAA 4.78 85,636,023.85 88,099,395.60 40.73% Aaa / AA+ 2.63 TOTAL Agency 85,040,000.00 1.61% 85,455,777.31 0.23% 392,950.48 2,643,618.29 Aaa 2.56 Corporate 24422ETF6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 750,000.00 Various 753,733.15 100.02 750,133.50 0.35% A2 / A 0.02 2.550% Due 01/08/2021 2.42% 750,017.67 1.61% 9,190.62 115.83 A 0.02 30231GAV4 Exxon Mobil Corp Callable Note Cont 2/1/2021 1,800,000.00 Various 1,813,024.00 100.14 1,802,581.20 0.84% Aa1 / AA 0.16 2.222% Due 03/01/2021 2.06% 1,800,235.83 0.48% 13,332.00 2,345.37 NR 0.09 369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note 1,130,000.00 05/08/2018 1,122,146.50 100.96 1,140,885.29 0.53% A2 / A 0.36 3.000% Due 05/11/2021 3.24% 1,129,068.47 0.33% 4,708.33 11,816.82 NR 0.36 166764BG4 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/2021 1,000,000.00 04/20/2017 1,000,190.00 100.54 1,005,448.00 0.46% Aa2 / AA 0.37 2.100% Due 05/16/2021 2.09% 1,000,017.31 0.21% 2,625.00 5,430.69 NR 0.29 857477AV5 State Street Bank Note 1,800,000.00 Various 1,802,989.00 100.67 1,811,986.21 0.84% A1 / A 0.38 1.950% Due 05/19/2021 1.91% 1,800,251.77 0.21% 4,095.01 11,734.44 AA- 0.38 594918BP8 Microsoft Callable Note Cont 7/8/2021 1,850,000.00 Various 1,846,471.85 100.69 1,862,726.16 0.86% Aaa / AAA 0.60 1.550% Due 08/08/2021 1.59% 1,849,571.17 0.22% 11,390.35 13,154.99 AA+ 0.52 68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021 1,000,000.00 06/28/2018 964,080.00 101.01 1,010,070.00 0.47% A3 / A 0.71 1.900% Due 09/15/2021 3.08% 992,136.76 0.28% 5,594.44 17,933.24 A- 0.62 91159HHP8 US Bancorp Callable Note Cont 12/23/2021 1,000,000.00 05/23/2017 1,011,640.00 102.30 1,022,951.00 0.48% A1 / A+ 1.07 2.625% Due 01/24/2022 2.35% 1,002,478.37 0.27% 11,447.92 20,472.63 A+ 0.96 32 86 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 808513AT2 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 12/25/2022 2,000,000.00 05/21/2019 1,993,920.00 104.76 2,095,118.00 0.97% A2 / A 2.07 2.650% Due 01/25/2023 2.74% 1,996,586.51 0.24% 22,966.67 98,531.49 A 1.93 44932HAH6 IBM Credit Corp Note 2,000,000.00 02/26/2018 1,991,340.00 105.90 2,118,046.00 0.99% A2 / A 2.10 3.000% Due 02/06/2023 3.09% 1,996,322.86 0.18% 24,166.67 121,723.14 NR 2.03 084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023 1,865,000.00 Various 1,818,500.75 105.02 1,958,552.13 0.91% Aa2 / AA 2.20 2.750% Due 03/15/2023 3.35% 1,842,504.35 0.28% 15,101.32 116,047.78 A+ 1.98 58933YAF2 Merck & Co Note 740,000.00 10/26/2018 720,996.80 106.05 784,752.24 0.36% A1 / AA- 2.38 2.800% Due 05/18/2023 3.41% 730,080.81 0.25% 2,474.89 54,671.43 A+ 2.31 46625HRL6 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 3/18/2023 500,000.00 12/20/2018 479,055.00 105.13 525,672.50 0.24% A2 / A- 2.38 2.700% Due 05/18/2023 3.74% 488,692.83 0.37% 1,612.50 36,979.67 AA- 2.16 69353RFL7 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 2,210,000.00 Various 2,206,955.80 107.35 2,372,468.15 1.09% A2 / A 2.44 3.500% Due 06/08/2023 3.53% 2,208,516.93 0.36% 4,941.80 163,951.22 A+ 2.28 166764AH3 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 3/24/2023 1,000,000.00 11/08/2018 983,170.00 106.36 1,063,563.00 0.49% Aa2 / AA 2.48 3.191% Due 06/24/2023 3.59% 990,965.37 0.33% 620.47 72,597.63 NR 2.17 931142EK5 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 5/26/2023 1,380,000.00 Various 1,379,641.30 107.39 1,482,042.72 0.68% Aa2 / AA 2.48 3.400% Due 06/26/2023 3.41% 1,379,821.92 0.31% 651.66 102,220.80 AA 2.33 02665WCJ8 American Honda Finance Note 1,000,000.00 Various 996,275.00 107.70 1,077,031.00 0.50% A3 / A- 2.53 3.450% Due 07/14/2023 3.54% 997,961.10 0.39% 16,004.17 79,069.90 NR 2.41 06406RAJ6 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Note 1,200,000.00 08/24/2018 1,201,836.00 108.10 1,297,155.60 0.60% A1 / A 2.61 3.450% Due 08/11/2023 3.42% 1,200,966.21 0.33% 16,100.00 96,189.39 AA- 2.49 06051GHF9 Bank of America Corp Callable Note 1X 3/5/2023 2,400,000.00 Various 2,434,650.00 106.83 2,563,896.00 1.19% A2 / A- 3.18 3.550% Due 03/05/2024 2.77% 2,422,375.01 0.40% 27,453.33 141,520.99 A+ 2.09 89114QCB2 Toronto Dominion Bank Note 2,300,000.00 03/26/2019 2,331,234.00 108.60 2,497,823.00 1.16% Aa3 / A 3.19 3.250% Due 03/11/2024 2.95% 2,320,103.65 0.53% 22,840.28 177,719.35 AA- 3.03 037833CU2 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 3,000,000.00 Various 3,038,334.00 107.82 3,234,747.00 1.49% Aa1 / AA+ 3.36 2.850% Due 05/11/2024 2.56% 3,026,388.61 0.38% 11,875.00 208,358.39 NR 3.07 24422ETT6 John Deere Capital Corp Note 1,000,000.00 08/26/2019 1,029,680.00 107.41 1,074,098.00 0.49% A2 / A 3.48 2.650% Due 06/24/2024 2.00% 1,021,392.51 0.50% 515.28 52,705.49 A 3.34 02665WCZ2 American Honda Finance Note 1,500,000.00 07/10/2019 1,493,742.00 106.22 1,593,297.00 0.73% A3 / A- 3.49 2.400% Due 06/27/2024 2.49% 1,495,603.51 0.60% 400.00 97,693.49 NR 3.36 78013XZU5 Royal Bank of Canada Note 2,500,000.00 09/10/2019 2,531,325.00 106.93 2,673,370.00 1.24% A2 / A 3.54 2.550% Due 07/16/2024 2.28% 2,522,878.41 0.57% 29,218.75 150,491.59 AA 3.37 46647PAU0 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note 1X 7/23/2023 2,500,000.00 09/12/2019 2,632,175.00 108.48 2,711,887.50 1.27% A2 / A- 3.56 3.797% Due 07/23/2024 2.11% 2,596,893.52 0.64% 41,661.53 114,993.98 AA- 3.32 33 87 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 90331HPL1 US Bank NA Callable Note Cont 12/21/2024 2,610,000.00 01/16/2020 2,604,440.70 105.82 2,761,959.42 1.28% A1 / AA- 4.06 2.050% Due 01/21/2025 2.10% 2,605,493.53 0.57% 23,780.00 156,465.89 AA- 3.80 00440EAS6 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Note 2,000,000.00 10/28/2020 2,203,740.00 110.38 2,207,528.00 1.02% A3 / A 4.21 3.150% Due 03/15/2025 0.78% 2,195,702.67 0.64% 18,550.00 11,825.33 A 3.94 438516CB0 Honeywell Intl Callable Note Cont 5/1/2025 2,500,000.00 06/23/2020 2,559,500.00 103.61 2,590,217.50 1.19% A2 / A 4.42 1.350% Due 06/01/2025 0.85% 2,553,116.60 0.51% 2,812.50 37,100.90 A 4.21 46,944,785.85 49,090,006.12 22.75% A1 / A+ 2.58 TOTAL Corporate 46,535,000.00 2.50% 46,916,144.26 0.43% 346,130.49 2,173,861.86 A+ 2.37 Money Market Fund FI 31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund Class Y 1,494,033.37 Various 1,494,033.37 1.00 1,494,033.37 0.69% Aaa / AAA 0.00 0.01% 1,494,033.37 0.01% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00 1,494,033.37 1,494,033.37 0.69% Aaa / AAA 0.00 TOTAL Money Market Fund FI 1,494,033.37 0.01% 1,494,033.37 0.01% 0.00 0.00 Aaa 0.00 Supranational 459058FY4 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 2,000,000.00 10/26/2017 1,990,320.00 101.91 2,038,244.00 0.95% Aaa / NR 1.07 2.000% Due 01/26/2022 2.12% 1,997,562.81 0.21% 17,222.22 40,681.19 AAA 1.05 4581X0CZ9 Inter-American Dev Bank Note 2,500,000.00 11/28/2017 2,451,675.00 102.67 2,566,862.50 1.19% Aaa / AAA 1.70 1.750% Due 09/14/2022 2.18% 2,482,841.72 0.18% 13,003.47 84,020.78 AAA 1.68 459058JB0 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 2,260,000.00 04/15/2020 2,251,253.80 100.97 2,281,831.60 1.05% Aaa / AAA 4.31 0.625% Due 04/22/2025 0.70% 2,252,470.41 0.40% 2,707.29 29,361.19 NR 4.24 459058JL8 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 2,400,000.00 10/21/2020 2,397,288.00 100.19 2,404,490.40 1.11% Aaa / AAA 4.83 0.500% Due 10/28/2025 0.52% 2,397,384.54 0.46% 2,100.00 7,105.86 AAA 4.76 9,090,536.80 9,291,428.50 4.29% Aaa / AAA 3.01 TOTAL Supranational 9,160,000.00 1.38% 9,130,259.48 0.31% 35,032.98 161,169.02 Aaa 2.96 US Treasury 912828U65 US Treasury Note 2,500,000.00 12/28/2016 2,464,461.50 101.48 2,536,915.00 1.17% Aaa / AA+ 0.92 1.750% Due 11/30/2021 2.06% 2,493,414.40 0.13% 3,846.15 43,500.60 AAA 0.91 912828V72 US Treasury Note 1,500,000.00 02/27/2017 1,502,407.37 101.89 1,528,359.00 0.71% Aaa / AA+ 1.08 1.875% Due 01/31/2022 1.84% 1,500,528.87 0.13% 11,769.70 27,830.13 AAA 1.07 912828J76 US Treasury Note 3,000,000.00 04/25/2017 2,985,830.37 102.03 3,060,936.00 1.42% Aaa / AA+ 1.25 1.750% Due 03/31/2022 1.85% 2,996,426.10 0.12% 13,413.46 64,509.90 AAA 1.23 912828WZ9 US Treasury Note 2,750,000.00 05/23/2017 2,738,944.75 102.17 2,809,727.25 1.30% Aaa / AA+ 1.33 1.750% Due 04/30/2022 1.84% 2,747,030.67 0.11% 8,329.33 62,696.58 AAA 1.32 34 88 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 912828XR6 US Treasury Note 1,500,000.00 06/28/2017 1,496,020.65 102.30 1,534,512.00 0.71% Aaa / AA+ 1.41 1.750% Due 05/31/2022 1.81% 1,498,859.56 0.12% 2,307.69 35,652.44 AAA 1.40 912828XW5 US Treasury Note 3,000,000.00 07/25/2017 2,984,072.55 102.43 3,073,008.00 1.41% Aaa / AA+ 1.50 1.750% Due 06/30/2022 1.86% 2,995,177.52 0.13% 145.03 77,830.48 AAA 1.49 912828L24 US Treasury Note 2,000,000.00 09/27/2017 1,995,944.20 102.90 2,057,968.00 0.95% Aaa / AA+ 1.67 1.875% Due 08/31/2022 1.92% 1,998,630.77 0.13% 12,741.71 59,337.23 AAA 1.63 912828L57 US Treasury Note 3,750,000.00 Various 3,702,841.80 102.82 3,855,907.50 1.78% Aaa / AA+ 1.75 1.750% Due 09/30/2022 2.02% 3,733,202.78 0.13% 16,766.83 122,704.72 AAA 1.72 912828M49 US Treasury Note 1,000,000.00 01/30/2018 973,359.38 103.20 1,031,953.00 0.48% Aaa / AA+ 1.83 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 2.47% 989,737.06 0.13% 3,211.33 42,215.94 AAA 1.80 9128284D9 US Treasury Note 3,750,000.00 Various 3,706,123.05 105.30 3,948,633.75 1.83% Aaa / AA+ 2.25 2.500% Due 03/31/2023 2.75% 3,730,071.06 0.14% 23,952.61 218,562.69 AAA 2.19 912828R69 US Treasury Note 1,500,000.00 05/30/2018 1,427,167.97 103.57 1,553,496.00 0.72% Aaa / AA+ 2.41 1.625% Due 05/31/2023 2.67% 1,464,900.23 0.14% 2,142.86 88,595.77 AAA 2.37 912828U57 US Treasury Note 5,000,000.00 Various 4,908,242.19 105.73 5,286,525.00 2.44% Aaa / AA+ 2.92 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 2.53% 4,944,842.97 0.15% 9,340.66 341,682.03 AAA 2.84 912828V80 US Treasury Note 5,000,000.00 Various 4,983,691.41 106.39 5,319,530.00 2.47% Aaa / AA+ 3.08 2.250% Due 01/31/2024 2.32% 4,989,566.67 0.17% 47,078.80 329,963.33 AAA 2.97 912828WJ5 US Treasury Note 1,750,000.00 06/10/2019 1,798,261.72 107.76 1,885,761.50 0.87% Aaa / AA+ 3.37 2.500% Due 05/15/2024 1.91% 1,782,978.84 0.19% 5,680.25 102,782.66 AAA 3.25 9128282N9 US Treasury Note 2,000,000.00 08/30/2019 2,064,531.25 106.83 2,136,640.00 0.99% Aaa / AA+ 3.58 2.125% Due 07/31/2024 1.44% 2,046,935.08 0.21% 17,785.33 89,704.92 AAA 3.44 912828YH7 US Treasury Note 3,500,000.00 Various 3,474,941.41 104.71 3,665,018.00 1.69% Aaa / AA+ 3.75 1.500% Due 09/30/2024 1.65% 3,480,639.56 0.24% 13,413.47 184,378.44 AAA 3.64 9128283J7 US Treasury Note 3,000,000.00 Various 3,051,650.40 107.29 3,218,790.00 1.48% Aaa / AA+ 3.92 2.125% Due 11/30/2024 1.76% 3,040,750.17 0.25% 5,604.40 178,039.83 AAA 3.77 912828ZC7 US Treasury Note 3,500,000.00 03/24/2020 3,603,222.66 103.53 3,623,455.50 1.67% Aaa / AA+ 4.16 1.125% Due 02/28/2025 0.52% 3,587,060.09 0.27% 13,378.80 36,395.41 AAA 4.06 912828ZL7 US Treasury Note 4,000,000.00 Various 3,998,593.75 100.36 4,014,532.00 1.85% Aaa / AA+ 4.33 0.375% Due 04/30/2025 0.38% 3,998,751.74 0.29% 2,569.06 15,780.26 AAA 4.29 91282CAM3 US Treasury Note 2,500,000.00 10/16/2020 2,491,406.25 99.62 2,490,527.50 1.15% Aaa / AA+ 4.75 0.250% Due 09/30/2025 0.32% 2,491,758.18 0.33% 1,596.84 (1,230.68) AAA 4.71 35 89 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration 91282CBC4 US Treasury Note 1,000,000.00 12/29/2020 999,921.88 100.08 1,000,781.00 0.46% Aaa / AA+ 5.00 0.375% Due 12/31/2025 0.38% 999,921.92 0.36% 10.36 859.08 AAA 4.95 57,351,636.51 59,632,976.00 27.55% Aaa / AA+ 2.76 TOTAL US Treasury 57,500,000.00 1.77% 57,511,184.24 0.18% 215,084.67 2,121,791.76 Aaa 2.69 209,105,404.11 216,259,536.19 100.00% Aa1 / AA 2.66 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 208,292,233.50 1.84% 209,086,194.35 0.27% 996,234.39 7,173,341.84 Aaa 2.49 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 217,255,770.58 36 90 Holdings Report As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account - Account #10219 Purchase Date Cost Value Mkt Price Market Value % of Port. Moody/S&P Maturity CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Book Yield Book Value Mkt YTM Accrued Int. Gain/Loss Fitch Duration LAIF 90LAIF$00 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 50,189,402.70 Various 50,189,402.70 1.00 50,189,402.70 45.75% NR / NR 0.00 0.52% 50,189,402.70 0.52% 73,593.72 0.00 NR 0.00 50,189,402.70 50,189,402.70 45.75% NR / NR 0.00 TOTAL LAIF 50,189,402.70 0.52% 50,189,402.70 0.52% 73,593.72 0.00 NR 0.00 Local Gov Investment Pool 90CAMP$00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 59,605,094.09 Various 59,605,094.09 1.00 59,605,094.09 54.25% NR / AAA 0.00 0.12% 59,605,094.09 0.12% 0.00 0.00 NR 0.00 59,605,094.09 59,605,094.09 54.25% NR / AAA 0.00 TOTAL Local Gov Investment Pool 59,605,094.09 0.12% 59,605,094.09 0.12% 0.00 0.00 NR 0.00 109,794,496.79 109,794,496.79 100.00% NR / AAA 0.00 TOTAL PORTFOLIO 109,794,496.79 0.30% 109,794,496.79 0.30% 73,593.72 0.00 NR 0.00 TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 109,868,090.51 37 91 SECTION | Section 5 | Transactions 38 92 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/19/2020 91282CAM3 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.656 0.32% 2,491,406.25 326.24 2,491,732.49 0.00 0.25% Due: 09/30/2025 Purchase 10/28/2020 459058JL8 2,400,000.00 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 99.887 0.52% 2,397,288.00 0.00 2,397,288.00 0.00 0.5% Due: 10/28/2025 Purchase 10/30/2020 00440EAS6 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Note 110.187 0.78% 2,203,740.00 7,875.00 2,211,615.00 0.00 3.15% Due: 03/15/2025 Purchase 11/12/2020 3135G06G3 2,860,000.00 FNMA Note 99.642 0.57% 2,849,761.20 0.00 2,849,761.20 0.00 0.5% Due: 11/07/2025 Purchase 12/31/2020 91282CBC4 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.992 0.38% 999,921.88 0.00 999,921.88 0.00 0.375% Due: 12/31/2025 Subtotal 10,760,000.00 10,942,117.33 8,201.24 10,950,318.57 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 10,760,000.00 10,942,117.33 8,201.24 10,950,318.57 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 10/19/2020 912828N89 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.355 1.49% 1,003,554.69 2,989.13 1,006,543.82 3,880.50 1.375% Due: 01/31/2021 Sale 10/19/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.375 2.54% 1,505,625.00 2,284.19 1,507,909.19 13,046.08 1.125% Due: 02/28/2021 Sale 10/22/2020 3135G0F73 1,500,000.00 FNMA Note 100.149 1.87% 1,502,235.00 8,875.00 1,511,110.00 2,803.93 1.5% Due: 11/30/2020 Sale 10/29/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.344 2.54% 1,505,156.25 2,750.35 1,507,906.60 12,015.13 1.125% Due: 02/28/2021 Sale 10/29/2020 912828T34 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.918 1.69% 504,589.84 448.15 505,037.99 6,926.38 1.125% Due: 09/30/2021 Sale 11/10/2020 912828T34 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.883 1.69% 1,008,828.13 1,267.17 1,010,095.30 13,334.32 1.125% Due: 09/30/2021 Subtotal 7,000,000.00 7,029,988.91 18,613.99 7,048,602.90 52,006.34 39 93 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin - Account #10198 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold Maturity 11/03/2020 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 10/3/2020 2.3% Due: 11/03/2020 Subtotal 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 9,000,000.00 9,029,988.91 18,613.99 9,048,602.90 52,006.34 40 94 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account - Account #10219 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/15/2020 90LAIF$00 120,058.01 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 0.66% 120,058.01 0.00 120,058.01 0.00 Purchase 10/31/2020 90CAMP$00 6,179.67 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.19% 6,179.67 0.00 6,179.67 0.00 Purchase 11/30/2020 90CAMP$00 4,075.40 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,075.40 0.00 4,075.40 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2020 90CAMP$00 4,407.24 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,407.24 0.00 4,407.24 0.00 Subtotal 134,720.32 134,720.32 0.00 134,720.32 0.00 Security 10/09/2020 90CAMP$00 2,800,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,800,000.00 0.00 2,800,000.00 0.00 Contribution Security 10/30/2020 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Security 12/21/2020 90CAMP$00 28,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 28,000,000.00 0.00 28,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Subtotal 32,800,000.00 32,800,000.00 0.00 32,800,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 32,934,720.32 32,934,720.32 0.00 32,934,720.32 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Security 10/02/2020 90CAMP$00 1,200,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,200,000.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 10/23/2020 90CAMP$00 500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 11/06/2020 90CAMP$00 5,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5,000,000.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 11/25/2020 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal 41 95 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Reporting Account - Account #10219 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold Security 12/11/2020 90CAMP$00 3,400,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,400,000.00 0.00 3,400,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Subtotal 11,100,000.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 11,100,000.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 42 96 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Consolidated - Account #10221 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/15/2020 90LAIF$00 120,058.01 Local Agency Investment Fund State Pool 1.000 0.66% 120,058.01 0.00 120,058.01 0.00 Purchase 10/19/2020 91282CAM3 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.656 0.32% 2,491,406.25 326.24 2,491,732.49 0.00 0.25% Due: 09/30/2025 Purchase 10/28/2020 459058JL8 2,400,000.00 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 99.887 0.52% 2,397,288.00 0.00 2,397,288.00 0.00 0.5% Due: 10/28/2025 Purchase 10/30/2020 00440EAS6 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Note 110.187 0.78% 2,203,740.00 7,875.00 2,211,615.00 0.00 3.15% Due: 03/15/2025 Purchase 10/31/2020 90CAMP$00 6,179.67 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.19% 6,179.67 0.00 6,179.67 0.00 Purchase 11/12/2020 3135G06G3 2,860,000.00 FNMA Note 99.642 0.57% 2,849,761.20 0.00 2,849,761.20 0.00 0.5% Due: 11/07/2025 Purchase 11/30/2020 90CAMP$00 4,075.40 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,075.40 0.00 4,075.40 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2020 90CAMP$00 4,407.24 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,407.24 0.00 4,407.24 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2020 91282CBC4 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.992 0.38% 999,921.88 0.00 999,921.88 0.00 0.375% Due: 12/31/2025 Subtotal 10,894,720.32 11,076,837.65 8,201.24 11,085,038.89 0.00 Security 10/09/2020 90CAMP$00 2,800,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,800,000.00 0.00 2,800,000.00 0.00 Contribution Security 10/30/2020 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Security 12/21/2020 90CAMP$00 28,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 28,000,000.00 0.00 28,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Subtotal 32,800,000.00 32,800,000.00 0.00 32,800,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 43,694,720.32 43,876,837.65 8,201.24 43,885,038.89 0.00 43 97 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Consolidated - Account #10221 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Sale 10/19/2020 912828N89 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.355 1.49% 1,003,554.69 2,989.13 1,006,543.82 3,880.50 1.375% Due: 01/31/2021 Sale 10/19/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.375 2.54% 1,505,625.00 2,284.19 1,507,909.19 13,046.08 1.125% Due: 02/28/2021 Sale 10/22/2020 3135G0F73 1,500,000.00 FNMA Note 100.149 1.87% 1,502,235.00 8,875.00 1,511,110.00 2,803.93 1.5% Due: 11/30/2020 Sale 10/29/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.344 2.54% 1,505,156.25 2,750.35 1,507,906.60 12,015.13 1.125% Due: 02/28/2021 Sale 10/29/2020 912828T34 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.918 1.69% 504,589.84 448.15 505,037.99 6,926.38 1.125% Due: 09/30/2021 Sale 11/10/2020 912828T34 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.883 1.69% 1,008,828.13 1,267.17 1,010,095.30 13,334.32 1.125% Due: 09/30/2021 Subtotal 7,000,000.00 7,029,988.91 18,613.99 7,048,602.90 52,006.34 Maturity 11/03/2020 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 10/3/2020 2.3% Due: 11/03/2020 Subtotal 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Security 10/02/2020 90CAMP$00 1,200,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,200,000.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 10/23/2020 90CAMP$00 500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 11/06/2020 90CAMP$00 5,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5,000,000.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 11/25/2020 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal 44 98 Transaction Ledger As of December 31, 2020 City of Dublin Consolidated - Account #10221 September 30, 2020 through December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold Security 12/11/2020 90CAMP$00 3,400,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,400,000.00 0.00 3,400,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Subtotal 11,100,000.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 11,100,000.00 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 20,100,000.00 20,129,988.91 18,613.99 20,148,602.90 52,006.34 45 99 Important Disclosures As of December 31, 2020 2020 Chandler Asset Management, Inc, An Independent Registered Investment Adviser. Information contained herein is confidential. Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A. Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio. Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Source ice Data Indices, LLC ("ICE"), used with permission. ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an "as is" basis; ICE, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE data, its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality, adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an "as is" basis and licensee's use it at licensee's own risk. ICE data, its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend chandler asset management, or any of its products or services. This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice. Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change. This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This report is not intended to constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment. Fixed income investments are subject to interest, credit and market risk. Interest rate risk: the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise. Credit risk: the possibility that the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal. Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk. Market risk: the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions, especially during periods of rising interest rates. Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 46 100 Benchmark Disclosures As of December 31, 2020 ICE BAML 1-5 Yr US Treasury/Agency Index The ICE BAML 1-5 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than five years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. (Index: GVA0. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information) The ICE BAML 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. (Index: G1A0. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information) 47 101 Attachment 2 City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/02/2020 31846V203 10.14 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 10.14 0.00 10.14 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/05/2020 31846V203 30,468.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/07/2020 31846V203 13,750.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 16,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 16,250.00 0.00 16,250.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 2,541.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,541.17 0.00 2,541.17 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 375.83 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 375.83 0.00 375.83 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 218.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 218.88 0.00 218.88 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 108,822.32 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 108,822.32 0.00 108,822.32 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 63,123.72 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 63,123.72 0.00 63,123.72 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 8,619.07 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 8,619.07 0.00 8,619.07 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 26,024.01 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 26,024.01 0.00 26,024.01 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 77,560.23 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 77,560.23 0.00 77,560.23 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 82,669.57 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 82,669.57 0.00 82,669.57 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 75,781.70 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 75,781.70 0.00 75,781.70 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 90,372.06 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 90,372.06 0.00 90,372.06 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/15/2020 31846V203 94,446.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 94,446.50 0.00 94,446.50 0.00 Class Y 102 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 10/15/2020 90LAIF$00 120,058.01 Local Agency Investment Fund State 1.000 0.66% 120,058.01 0.00 120,058.01 0.00 Pool Purchase 10/19/2020 31846V203 22,720.52 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 22,720.52 0.00 22,720.52 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/19/2020 31846V203 218.71 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 218.71 0.00 218.71 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/19/2020 31846V203 39,570.61 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 39,570.61 0.00 39,570.61 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/19/2020 31846V203 123,591.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 123,591.17 0.00 123,591.17 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/19/2020 91282CAM3 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.656 0.32% 2,491,406.25 326.24 2,491,732.49 0.00 0.25% Due 9/30/2025 Purchase 10/21/2020 31846V203 79,567.58 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 79,567.58 0.00 79,567.58 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/22/2020 31846V203 1,511,110.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 1,511,110.00 0.00 1,511,110.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/22/2020 31846V203 12,713.56 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 12,713.56 0.00 12,713.56 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/28/2020 459058JL8 2,400,000.00 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 99.887 0.52% 2,397,288.00 0.00 2,397,288.00 0.00 0.5% Due 10/28/2025 Purchase 10/29/2020 31846V203 2,012,944.59 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,012,944.59 0.00 2,012,944.59 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/30/2020 00440EAS6 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Note 110.187 0.78% 2,203,740.00 7,875.00 2,211,615.00 0.00 3.15% Due 3/15/2025 Purchase 10/30/2020 31846V203 24,062.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 24,062.50 0.00 24,062.50 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/31/2020 31846V203 16,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 16,875.00 0.00 16,875.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 10/31/2020 90CAMP$00 6,179.67 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.19% 6,179.67 0.00 6,179.67 0.00 Subtotal 11,560,645.87 11,753,080.12 8,201.24 11,761,281.36 0.00 Security 10/09/2020 90CAMP$00 2,800,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,800,000.00 0.00 2,800,000.00 0.00 Contribution 103 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Security 10/30/2020 90CAMP$00 2,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Subtotal 4,800,000.00 4,800,000.00 0.00 4,800,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 16,360,645.87 16,553,080.12 8,201.24 16,561,281.36 0.00 DISPOSITIONS Sale 10/19/2020 912828N89 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.355 1.49% 1,003,554.69 2,989.13 1,006,543.82 3,880.50 1.375% Due 1/31/2021 Sale 10/19/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.375 2.54% 1,505,625.00 2,284.19 1,507,909.19 13,046.08 1.125% Due 2/28/2021 Sale 10/22/2020 3135G0F73 1,500,000.00 FNMA Note 100.149 1.87% 1,502,235.00 8,875.00 1,511,110.00 2,803.93 1.5% Due 11/30/2020 Sale 10/28/2020 31846V203 2,397,288.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,397,288.00 0.00 2,397,288.00 0.00 Class Y Sale 10/29/2020 912828P87 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.344 2.54% 1,505,156.25 2,750.35 1,507,906.60 12,015.13 1.125% Due 2/28/2021 Sale 10/29/2020 912828T34 500,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.918 1.69% 504,589.84 448.15 505,037.99 6,926.38 1.125% Due 9/30/2021 Sale 10/30/2020 31846V203 2,211,615.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,211,615.00 0.00 2,211,615.00 0.00 Class Y Subtotal 10,608,903.00 10,630,063.78 17,346.82 10,647,410.60 38,672.02 Paydown 10/15/2020 43815NAB0 107,549.91 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 100.000 107,549.91 1,272.41 108,822.32 0.00 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 Paydown 10/15/2020 477870AB5 62,318.52 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 100.000 62,318.52 805.20 63,123.72 0.00 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 104 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Paydown 10/15/2020 47787NAC3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3 100.000 0.00 218.88 218.88 0.00 0.51% Due 11/15/2024 Paydown 10/15/2020 47788BAD6 8,605.19 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 100.000 8,605.19 13.88 8,619.07 0.00 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 Paydown 10/15/2020 47788CAC6 25,690.33 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 100.000 25,690.33 333.68 26,024.01 0.00 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 Paydown 10/15/2020 47788EAC2 75,010.68 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 100.000 75,010.68 2,549.55 77,560.23 0.00 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 Paydown 10/15/2020 47789JAB2 82,301.49 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 100.000 82,301.49 368.08 82,669.57 0.00 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 Paydown 10/15/2020 65479GAD1 73,295.07 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B 100.000 73,295.07 2,486.63 75,781.70 0.00 A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 10/15/2020 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C 100.000 0.00 2,541.17 2,541.17 0.00 A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 Paydown 10/15/2020 89231PAD0 86,397.06 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D 100.000 86,397.06 3,975.00 90,372.06 0.00 A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 10/15/2020 89237VAB5 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C 100.000 0.00 375.83 375.83 0.00 A3 0.44% Due 10/15/2024 Paydown 10/15/2020 89239AAB9 94,071.18 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A 100.000 94,071.18 375.32 94,446.50 0.00 A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 Paydown 10/19/2020 43813KAC6 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 100.000 0.00 218.71 218.71 0.00 A3 0.37% Due 10/18/2024 Paydown 10/19/2020 43814UAG4 38,731.61 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 100.000 38,731.61 839.00 39,570.61 0.00 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 Paydown 10/19/2020 43814WAB1 122,992.22 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 100.000 122,992.22 598.95 123,591.17 0.00 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 105 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Paydown 10/21/2020 43815HAC1 77,507.90 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 100.000 77,507.90 2,059.68 79,567.58 0.00 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 Subtotal 854,471.16 854,471.16 19,031.97 873,503.13 0.00 Security 10/02/2020 90CAMP$00 1,200,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,200,000.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 10/23/2020 90CAMP$00 500,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 10/26/2020 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Withdrawal Class Y Subtotal 1,700,104.17 1,700,104.17 0.00 1,700,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 13,163,478.33 13,184,639.11 36,378.79 13,221,017.90 38,672.02 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 10/05/2020 3135G0T45 3,250,000.00 FNMA Note 0.000 30,468.75 0.00 30,468.75 0.00 1.875% Due 4/5/2022 Interest 10/07/2020 3135G0Q89 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 0.000 13,750.00 0.00 13,750.00 0.00 1.375% Due 10/7/2021 Interest 10/15/2020 3135G0W66 2,000,000.00 FNMA Note 0.000 16,250.00 0.00 16,250.00 0.00 1.625% Due 10/15/2024 Interest 10/22/2020 3135G03U5 1,825,000.00 FNMA Note 0.000 5,639.76 0.00 5,639.76 0.00 0.625% Due 4/22/2025 Interest 10/22/2020 459058JB0 2,260,000.00 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note 0.000 7,073.80 0.00 7,073.80 0.00 0.625% Due 4/22/2025 Interest 10/30/2020 912828WZ9 2,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 24,062.50 0.00 24,062.50 0.00 1.75% Due 4/30/2022 Interest 10/31/2020 912828M49 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 9,375.00 0.00 9,375.00 0.00 1.875% Due 10/31/2022 106 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of October 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 10/31/2020 912828ZL7 4,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 0.375% Due 4/30/2025 Subtotal 19,085,000.00 114,119.81 0.00 114,119.81 0.00 Dividend 10/02/2020 31846V203 287,330.07 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 10.14 0.00 10.14 0.00 Class Y Dividend 10/15/2020 90LAIF$00 4,604,022,514.54 Local Agency Investment Fund State 0.000 120,058.01 0.00 120,058.01 0.00 Pool Dividend 10/31/2020 90CAMP$00 40,990,431.78 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 6,179.67 0.00 6,179.67 0.00 Subtotal 4,645,300,276.39 126,247.82 0.00 126,247.82 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 4,664,385,276.39 240,367.63 0.00 240,367.63 0.00 107 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 16 Execution Time: 11/10/2020 9:43:48 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 11/02/2020 31846V203 5.19 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 5.19 0.00 5.19 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/03/2020 31846V203 2,000,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/03/2020 31846V203 23,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/10/2020 31846V203 1,010,095.30 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 1,010,095.30 0.00 1,010,095.30 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/11/2020 31846V203 59,700.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 59,700.00 0.00 59,700.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/12/2020 3135G06G3 2,860,000.00 FNMA Note 99.642 0.57% 2,849,761.20 0.00 2,849,761.20 0.00 0.5% Due 11/7/2025 Purchase 11/15/2020 31846V203 21,875.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 10,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 2,541.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,541.17 0.00 2,541.17 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 218.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 218.88 0.00 218.88 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 375.83 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 375.83 0.00 375.83 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 106,205.51 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 106,205.51 0.00 106,205.51 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 90,117.60 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 90,117.60 0.00 90,117.60 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 545.38 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 545.38 0.00 545.38 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 40,472.15 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 40,472.15 0.00 40,472.15 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 114,098.90 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 114,098.90 0.00 114,098.90 0.00 Class Y 108 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 72,851.60 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 72,851.60 0.00 72,851.60 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 76,234.57 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 76,234.57 0.00 76,234.57 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 111,789.63 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 111,789.63 0.00 111,789.63 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/16/2020 31846V203 65,226.40 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 65,226.40 0.00 65,226.40 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/18/2020 31846V203 17,110.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 17,110.00 0.00 17,110.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/18/2020 31846V203 345.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 345.33 0.00 345.33 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/18/2020 31846V203 37,568.68 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 37,568.68 0.00 37,568.68 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/18/2020 31846V203 119,467.23 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 119,467.23 0.00 119,467.23 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/19/2020 31846V203 17,550.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/23/2020 31846V203 78,987.68 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 78,987.68 0.00 78,987.68 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/30/2020 31846V203 132,187.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 132,187.50 0.00 132,187.50 0.00 Class Y Purchase 11/30/2020 90CAMP$00 4,075.40 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,075.40 0.00 4,075.40 0.00 Subtotal 7,073,144.93 7,062,906.13 0.00 7,062,906.13 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 7,073,144.93 7,062,906.13 0.00 7,062,906.13 0.00 109 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Sale 11/10/2020 912828T34 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 100.883 1.69% 1,008,828.13 1,267.17 1,010,095.30 13,334.32 1.125% Due 9/30/2021 Sale 11/12/2020 31846V203 2,849,761.20 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,849,761.20 0.00 2,849,761.20 0.00 Class Y Subtotal 3,849,761.20 3,858,589.33 1,267.17 3,859,856.50 13,334.32 Paydown 11/16/2020 43815NAB0 105,103.39 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 100.000 105,103.39 1,102.12 106,205.51 0.00 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 Paydown 11/16/2020 477870AB5 89,430.80 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 100.000 89,430.80 686.80 90,117.60 0.00 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 Paydown 11/16/2020 47787NAC3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3 100.000 0.00 218.88 218.88 0.00 0.51% Due 11/15/2024 Paydown 11/16/2020 47788BAD6 544.55 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3 100.000 544.55 0.83 545.38 0.00 1.82% Due 10/15/2021 Paydown 11/16/2020 47788CAC6 40,195.42 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 100.000 40,195.42 276.73 40,472.15 0.00 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 Paydown 11/16/2020 47788EAC2 111,741.87 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 100.000 111,741.87 2,357.03 114,098.90 0.00 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 Paydown 11/16/2020 47789JAB2 72,678.99 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2 100.000 72,678.99 172.61 72,851.60 0.00 2.85% Due 12/15/2021 Paydown 11/16/2020 65479GAD1 73,934.84 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B 100.000 73,934.84 2,299.73 76,234.57 0.00 A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 11/16/2020 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C 100.000 0.00 2,541.17 2,541.17 0.00 A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 Paydown 11/16/2020 89231PAD0 108,043.58 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D 100.000 108,043.58 3,746.05 111,789.63 0.00 A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 11/16/2020 89237VAB5 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C 100.000 0.00 375.83 375.83 0.00 A3 0.44% Due 10/15/2024 110 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Paydown 11/16/2020 89239AAB9 65,072.94 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2019-A 100.000 65,072.94 153.46 65,226.40 0.00 A2A 2.83% Due 10/15/2021 Paydown 11/18/2020 43813KAC6 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 100.000 0.00 345.33 345.33 0.00 A3 0.37% Due 10/18/2024 Paydown 11/18/2020 43814UAG4 36,826.83 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 100.000 36,826.83 741.85 37,568.68 0.00 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 Paydown 11/18/2020 43814WAB1 119,150.14 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 100.000 119,150.14 317.09 119,467.23 0.00 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 Paydown 11/23/2020 43815HAC1 77,118.54 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 100.000 77,118.54 1,869.14 78,987.68 0.00 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 Subtotal 899,841.89 899,841.89 17,204.65 917,046.54 0.00 Maturity 11/03/2020 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note 100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Cont 10/3/2020 2.3% Due 11/3/2020 Subtotal 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Security 11/06/2020 90CAMP$00 5,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 5,000,000.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 11/25/2020 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Withdrawal Class Y Security 11/25/2020 90CAMP$00 1,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Subtotal 6,000,104.17 6,000,104.17 0.00 6,000,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 12,749,707.26 12,758,535.39 18,471.82 12,777,007.21 13,334.32 111 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 11/03/2020 00440EAT4 2,000,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note 0.000 23,000.00 0.00 23,000.00 0.00 Cont 10/3/2020 2.3% Due 11/3/2020 Interest 11/11/2020 037833CU2 3,000,000.00 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 3/11/2024 0.000 42,750.00 0.00 42,750.00 0.00 2.85% Due 5/11/2024 Interest 11/11/2020 369550BE7 1,130,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note 0.000 16,950.00 0.00 16,950.00 0.00 3% Due 5/11/2021 Interest 11/15/2020 912828WJ5 1,750,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 2.5% Due 5/15/2024 Interest 11/16/2020 166764BG4 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 0.000 10,500.00 0.00 10,500.00 0.00 4/15/2021 2.1% Due 5/16/2021 Interest 11/18/2020 46625HRL6 500,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 0.000 6,750.00 0.00 6,750.00 0.00 3/18/2023 2.7% Due 5/18/2023 Interest 11/18/2020 58933YAF2 740,000.00 Merck & Co Note 0.000 10,360.00 0.00 10,360.00 0.00 2.8% Due 5/18/2023 Interest 11/19/2020 857477AV5 1,800,000.00 State Street Bank Note 0.000 17,550.00 0.00 17,550.00 0.00 1.95% Due 5/19/2021 Interest 11/30/2020 9128283J7 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 31,875.00 0.00 31,875.00 0.00 2.125% Due 11/30/2024 Interest 11/30/2020 912828R69 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 12,187.50 0.00 12,187.50 0.00 1.625% Due 5/31/2023 Interest 11/30/2020 912828U57 5,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 53,125.00 0.00 53,125.00 0.00 2.125% Due 11/30/2023 Interest 11/30/2020 912828U65 2,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 21,875.00 0.00 21,875.00 0.00 1.75% Due 11/30/2021 Interest 11/30/2020 912828XR6 1,500,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 13,125.00 0.00 13,125.00 0.00 1.75% Due 5/31/2022 Subtotal 25,420,000.00 281,922.50 0.00 281,922.50 0.00 Dividend 11/02/2020 31846V203 212,731.09 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 5.19 0.00 5.19 0.00 Class Y 112 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of November 30, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold OTHER TRANSACTIONS Dividend 11/30/2020 90CAMP$00 36,996,611.45 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 4,075.40 0.00 4,075.40 0.00 Subtotal 37,209,342.54 4,080.59 0.00 4,080.59 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 62,629,342.54 286,003.09 0.00 286,003.09 0.00 113 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15 Execution Time: 12/11/2020 8:35:07 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 12/01/2020 31846V203 18,093.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 18,093.75 0.00 18,093.75 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/01/2020 31846V203 7.40 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 7.40 0.00 7.40 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/08/2020 31846V203 123,050.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 123,050.00 0.00 123,050.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/09/2020 31846V203 24,375.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/11/2020 31846V203 28,125.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/14/2020 31846V203 54,553.13 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 54,553.13 0.00 54,553.13 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 2,541.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2,541.17 0.00 2,541.17 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 375.83 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 375.83 0.00 375.83 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 218.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 218.88 0.00 218.88 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 95,719.69 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 95,719.69 0.00 95,719.69 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 52,048.92 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 52,048.92 0.00 52,048.92 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 21,111.51 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 21,111.51 0.00 21,111.51 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 74,049.75 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 74,049.75 0.00 74,049.75 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 68,292.16 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 68,292.16 0.00 68,292.16 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/15/2020 31846V203 101,439.87 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 101,439.87 0.00 101,439.87 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/17/2020 31846V203 8,492.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 8,492.08 0.00 8,492.08 0.00 Class Y 114 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10 Execution Time: 1/11/2021 9:47:04 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold ACQUISITIONS Purchase 12/18/2020 31846V203 345.33 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 345.33 0.00 345.33 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/18/2020 31846V203 34,482.29 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 34,482.29 0.00 34,482.29 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/18/2020 31846V203 19,260.20 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 19,260.20 0.00 19,260.20 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/19/2020 31846V203 27,500.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/21/2020 31846V203 71,124.41 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 71,124.41 0.00 71,124.41 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/24/2020 31846V203 29,205.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 29,205.00 0.00 29,205.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/26/2020 31846V203 23,460.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/27/2020 31846V203 18,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/29/2020 31846V203 2.80 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 2.80 0.00 2.80 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/31/2020 31846V203 26,250.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 Class Y Purchase 12/31/2020 90CAMP$00 4,407.24 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 0.12% 4,407.24 0.00 4,407.24 0.00 Purchase 12/31/2020 91282CBC4 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 99.992 0.38% 999,921.88 0.00 999,921.88 0.00 0.375% Due 12/31/2025 Subtotal 1,926,531.41 1,926,453.29 0.00 1,926,453.29 0.00 Security 12/21/2020 90CAMP$00 28,000,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 28,000,000.00 0.00 28,000,000.00 0.00 Contribution Subtotal 28,000,000.00 28,000,000.00 0.00 28,000,000.00 0.00 TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 29,926,531.41 29,926,453.29 0.00 29,926,453.29 0.00 115 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11 Execution Time: 1/11/2021 9:47:04 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Sale 12/31/2020 31846V203 999,921.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 0.01% 999,921.88 0.00 999,921.88 0.00 Class Y Subtotal 999,921.88 999,921.88 0.00 999,921.88 0.00 Paydown 12/15/2020 43815NAB0 94,783.98 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3 100.000 94,783.98 935.71 95,719.69 0.00 A2 1.9% Due 4/15/2022 Paydown 12/15/2020 477870AB5 51,532.04 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-B A2 100.000 51,532.04 516.88 52,048.92 0.00 2.28% Due 5/16/2022 Paydown 12/15/2020 47787NAC3 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2020-B A3 100.000 0.00 218.88 218.88 0.00 0.51% Due 11/15/2024 Paydown 12/15/2020 47788CAC6 20,923.88 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-A A3 100.000 20,923.88 187.63 21,111.51 0.00 2.66% Due 4/18/2022 Paydown 12/15/2020 47788EAC2 71,979.53 John Deere Owner Trust 2018-B A3 100.000 71,979.53 2,070.22 74,049.75 0.00 3.08% Due 11/15/2022 Paydown 12/15/2020 65479GAD1 66,180.97 Nissan Auto Receivables Trust 2018-B 100.000 66,180.97 2,111.19 68,292.16 0.00 A3 3.06% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 12/15/2020 65479JAD5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2019-C 100.000 0.00 2,541.17 2,541.17 0.00 A3 1.93% Due 7/15/2024 Paydown 12/15/2020 89231PAD0 97,980.14 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2018-D 100.000 97,980.14 3,459.73 101,439.87 0.00 A3 3.18% Due 3/15/2023 Paydown 12/15/2020 89237VAB5 0.00 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2020-C 100.000 0.00 375.83 375.83 0.00 A3 0.44% Due 10/15/2024 Paydown 12/18/2020 43813KAC6 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2020-3 100.000 0.00 345.33 345.33 0.00 A3 0.37% Due 10/18/2024 Paydown 12/18/2020 43814UAG4 33,832.81 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-2 100.000 33,832.81 649.48 34,482.29 0.00 A3 3.01% Due 5/18/2022 116 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12 Execution Time: 1/11/2021 9:47:04 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold DISPOSITIONS Paydown 12/18/2020 43814WAB1 19,216.16 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1 100.000 19,216.16 44.04 19,260.20 0.00 A2 2.75% Due 9/20/2021 Paydown 12/21/2020 43815HAC1 69,444.85 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2018-3 100.000 69,444.85 1,679.56 71,124.41 0.00 A3 2.95% Due 8/22/2022 Subtotal 525,874.36 525,874.36 15,135.65 541,010.01 0.00 Security 12/11/2020 90CAMP$00 3,400,000.00 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 1.000 3,400,000.00 0.00 3,400,000.00 0.00 Withdrawal Security 12/24/2020 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund 1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00 Withdrawal Class Y Subtotal 3,400,104.17 3,400,104.17 0.00 3,400,104.17 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 4,925,900.41 4,925,900.41 15,135.65 4,941,036.06 0.00 OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 12/01/2020 438516CB0 2,500,000.00 Honeywell Intl Callable Note Cont 0.000 18,093.75 0.00 18,093.75 0.00 5/1/2025 1.35% Due 6/1/2025 Interest 12/08/2020 3130A0F70 5,000,000.00 FHLB Note 0.000 84,375.00 0.00 84,375.00 0.00 3.375% Due 12/8/2023 Interest 12/08/2020 69353RFL7 2,210,000.00 PNC Bank Callable Note Cont 5/9/2023 0.000 38,675.00 0.00 38,675.00 0.00 3.5% Due 6/8/2023 Interest 12/09/2020 313383QR5 1,500,000.00 FHLB Note 0.000 24,375.00 0.00 24,375.00 0.00 3.25% Due 6/9/2023 Interest 12/11/2020 313379RB7 3,000,000.00 FHLB Note 0.000 28,125.00 0.00 28,125.00 0.00 1.875% Due 6/11/2021 Interest 12/14/2020 3130A1XJ2 3,795,000.00 FHLB Note 0.000 54,553.13 0.00 54,553.13 0.00 2.875% Due 6/14/2024 Interest 12/17/2020 3135G04Z3 3,435,000.00 FNMA Note 0.000 8,492.08 0.00 8,492.08 0.00 0.5% Due 6/17/2025 117 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13 Execution Time: 1/11/2021 9:47:04 AM City of Dublin Consolidated Transaction Ledger Account #10221 As of December 31, 2020 Transaction Settlement Acq/Disp Interest CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Amount Total Amount Gain/Loss Type Date Yield Pur/Sold OTHER TRANSACTIONS Interest 12/19/2020 3137EAEN5 2,000,000.00 FHLMC Note 0.000 27,500.00 0.00 27,500.00 0.00 2.75% Due 6/19/2023 Interest 12/24/2020 166764AH3 1,000,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 0.000 15,955.00 0.00 15,955.00 0.00 3/24/2023 3.191% Due 6/24/2023 Interest 12/24/2020 24422ETT6 1,000,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note 0.000 13,250.00 0.00 13,250.00 0.00 2.65% Due 6/24/2024 Interest 12/26/2020 931142EK5 1,380,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Callable Note Cont 0.000 23,460.00 0.00 23,460.00 0.00 5/26/2023 3.4% Due 6/26/2023 Interest 12/27/2020 02665WCZ2 1,500,000.00 American Honda Finance Note 0.000 18,000.00 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 2.4% Due 6/27/2024 Interest 12/31/2020 912828XW5 3,000,000.00 US Treasury Note 0.000 26,250.00 0.00 26,250.00 0.00 1.75% Due 6/30/2022 Subtotal 31,320,000.00 381,103.96 0.00 381,103.96 0.00 Dividend 12/01/2020 31846V203 1,590,029.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 7.40 0.00 7.40 0.00 Class Y Dividend 12/29/2020 31846V203 2,467,702.45 First American Govt Obligation Fund 0.000 2.80 0.00 2.80 0.00 Class Y Dividend 12/31/2020 90CAMP$00 59,600,686.85 California Asset Mgmt Program CAMP 0.000 4,407.24 0.00 4,407.24 0.00 Subtotal 63,658,418.30 4,417.44 0.00 4,417.44 0.00 TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 94,978,418.30 385,521.40 0.00 385,521.40 0.00 118 Chandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14 Execution Time: 1/11/2021 9:47:04 AM Agenda Item 4.5 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Plans and Specifications, Reject Bid Protest, and Award of Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Project No. PK0119 Prepared by: Rosemary Alex, Parks and Facilities Development Coordinator EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider approving the plans and specifications, rejecting a bid protest, and awarding a contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 project, CIP No. PK0119. The scope of work includes construction of a cricket pitch, lighted batting cages, four volleyball courts, play area, and two little league baseball fields. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution Approving the Plans and Specifications, Rejecting a Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Project, CIP No. PK0119. FINANCIAL IMPACT: As approved in the 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program, the total budget for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 project is $10,598,000 and is funded by Public Facility Fees Fund as shown in Attachment 2. The budget for improvements is $8,233,770. The low bid submitted by Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. is $6,617,814 and Staff recommends a construction contingency of $700,000, for a total potential construction cost of $7,317,814. Sufficient funds are available in the project budget to award a construction contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. DESCRIPTION: The 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 project, CIP No. PK0119. On December 17, 2019, the City Council approved the conceptual design for the project, which included the following elements: Little League Fields: Two fields with fencing, scoreboards, bleachers, single story Page 1 of 3 119 scorekeeper booth, bull pens, dugouts, walkways, planting, and irrigation. Plaza Area: Walkways, playground, planting, and irrigation. Courts/Cages/Lawn: Four volleyball courts, with one set of bleacher pads, five-bay batting cage with lighting, lawn area, walkways, planting, and irrigation. Cricket Area: Lawn area, single pitch, walkways, concrete terrace seating/steps, two sight screens, drainage, planting, and irrigation. Upon approval of the conceptual design, Staff was directed to proceed with updating the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project as it included lighting for the five-bay batting cages which differed from the approved Master Plan for the park. On June 16, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 57-20 approving an addendum to a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment 5). The plans and specifications were completed and advertised for bid in December 2020. A total of four sealed bids were received on January 21, 2021. A summary of bids is provided as Attachment 3. Staff reviewed the bid results and bidder qualifications, checked references and necessary licenses, and found that Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. (SMC) was the lowest responsive bidder. Bid Protest In accordance with the Instructions to Bidders, the second lowest bidder, Robert A. Bothman, submitted a bid protest to the City, dated January 25, 2021 (Attachment 4). The protest claims that the lowest bidder, SMC, is non-responsive for failure to meet the specific experience requirements. Staff and the City Attorney reviewed the protest, determined that the claim lacks legal merit, and recommends that the City Council reject the protest. The City’s bid qualifications require bidders to have successfully completed the construction of a minimum of two “qualifying facilities.” A qualifying facility is either a Public Facility valued at over $7 million for which the bidder was a General Contractor, or a commercial landscape construction project valued at over $10 million for which the bidder was a General Contractor or Subcontractor. In its sealed bid, SMC listed two qualifying facilities with values over $7 million for which they served as General Contractor: the Waterfront Park Renovation and the Presidio Middle School Project. The protest letter asserts that the Presidio Middle School Project is not a qualifying facility, based on the claim that Van Acker Construction Associates, Inc. was the General Contractor and SMC was the Subcontractor for the Presidio Middle School Project. In response to the protest letter, SMC provided additional information and documentation for City review. Upon review of SMC’s information and documentation, Staff and the City Attorney found that Van Acker Construction Associates, Inc. served as the project manager not the General Contractor, and that SMC was the General Contractor for the Presidio Middle School Project; therefore, Staff and the City Attorney concluded that SMC meets the City’s qualification requirements and is the lowest responsible bidder submitting a responsive bid. Staff recommends that the City Council reject the protest as lacking legal merit and adopt the Resolution (Attachment 1) awarding the construction contract to SMC. Page 2 of 3 120 In order to facilitate the approval of contract change orders and avoid construction delay, it is requested that the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders up to the contingency amount of $700,000. The Resolution will authorize this change as it relates to the project. If the construction contract is awarded to SMC, Staff expects work to begin in early March 2021, with onsite construction activity commencing in late April. The project is anticipated to be complete, including the 90-day plant establishment period, in summer 2022. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: A copy of this Staff Report was sent to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. and Robert A. Bothman, and the City Council Agenda was posted. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution - Approving the Plans and Specifications, Rejecting a Bid Protest, and Awarding a Contract to Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. for the Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 Project, CIP NO. PK0119 2) Fallon Sports Park – Phase 3 CIP Budget 3) Bid Results 4) Bid Protest RAB 5) Resolution No. 57-20 - Approved Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 3 of 3 121 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. XX – 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, REJECTING A BID PROTEST, AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO SUAREZ AND MUNOZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE FALLON SPORTS PARK – PHASE 3 PROJECT CIP NO. PK0119 WHEREAS, the design team completed plans and specifications for the Fallon Sports Park - Phase 3 Project, CIP No. PK0119 (“Project”), and the Project includes the construction of two little league fields, play area, four volleyball courts, five-bay lighted batting cage and cricket pitch at Fallon Sports Park; and WHEREAS, the City of Dublin did, on January 21, 2021, publicly open, examine, and declare all sealed bids for doing the work described in the approved plans and specifications for the Project, which plans and specifications, are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said work and for all particulars relative to the proceedings under the request for bids; and WHEREAS, said bids were submitted to City Staff and Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. was determined to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for doing said work; and WHEREAS, a bid protest from Robert A. Bothman was filed with the City by 5:00 p.m. on the third business day after bid opening in accordance with the Instructions to Bidders; and WHEREAS, the bid protest from Robert A. Bothman was deemed meritless based on the additional documentation received from Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby approve the plans and specifications for the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby reject the bid protest from Robert A. Bothman. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby award the Contract for the Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc., at a bid of six million, six hundred seventeen thousand, eight hundred fourteen dollars and zero cents ($6,617,814.00), the particulars of which bids are on file in the Office of the Public Works Director. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Dublin does hereby authorize the City Manager or designee to approve the Project Contract Change Orders based on the appropriate funds designated for the Project up to the contingency amount of seven hundred thousand dollars and zero cents ($700,000.00). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute the Project Construction Agreement with Suarez and Munoz Construction, Inc. Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 1 of 2 122 Attachment 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February 2021, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______Mayor ATTEST: ______City Clerk Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 2 of 2 123 Attachment 2 Number PK0119 FALLON SPORTS PARK - PHASE 3 Program PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTION Fallon Sports Park is a 60-acre community park bordered by Fallon Road, Central Parkway, Lockhart Street and Gleason Drive. Phases 1 and 2 of the park have been completed and Phase 3 represents the final phase of park development. The Phase 3 project provides for the design and construction of the remaining 14 acres of Fallon Sports Park, referred to as the Upper Terrace. On December 17, 2019, City Council approved the concept design that includes a cricket field, sand volleyball courts and multi-sport batting cages. Construction is anticipated to start in 2021. ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT: $260,000 MANAGING DEPARTMENT: Public Works 2020-2025 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PRIOR 2019-2020 FUTURE ESTIMATED COSTS YEARS BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 YEARS TOTALS 9100 Salaries & Benefits $19,909 $44,519 $105,590 $170,018 9200 Contract Services $55,696 $1,938,416 $1,994,112 9400 Improvements $980,924 $7,252,846 $8,233,770 9500 Miscellaneous $26 $200,074 $200,100 TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 PRIOR 2019-2020 FUTURE FUNDING SOURCE YEARS BUDGET 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 YEARS TOTALS 4100 Public Facility Fees $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 TOTAL $75,631 $3,163,933 $7,358,436 $10,598,000 ANNUAL OPERATING IMPACT $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 124 Attachment 3 CITY OF DUBLIN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION BID SUMMARY Project Name: Fallon Sports Park - Phase 3 Project No. : PK0119 Bid Date: January 21, 2021 Suarez and Munoz Robert A. Bothman Jensen Landscape Contractor Granite Rock Company BASED BID Construction Inc. Construction LLC ITEM DESCRIPTION Qty. UNIT Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension Unit Cost Extension 1 Base Bid Item #1 - Base Contract Work 1 LS $6,615,414.00 $6,615,414.00 $7,187,000.00 $7,187,000.00 $7,297,777.00 $7,297,777.00 $7,494,707.00 $7,494,707.00 2 Base Bid Item #2 - CO #1 1 LS $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL $6,617,814.00 $7,197,000.00 $7,347,777.00 $7,499,707.00 APPARENT LOW BIDDER List of Sub-Contractors Suarez and Munoz Robert A. Bothman Jensen Landscape Contractor Granite Rock Company Description Construction Inc. Construction LLC Surveying and Staking Construction Survey Inc. Mike O'Dell Kier and Wright Play Equipment Installation Who Built Creative Builders Inc. Ross Recreation Equipment Fencing and Gates AAA Fence Company Inc. Golden Bay Fence Calco Golden Bay Fence Synthetic Turf Heavenly Construction Inc. Valley Precision Grading Inc. Plae/Century Turf Inc. Plae Electrical Bockman and Woody Bockman and Woody Electric Bockman and Woody Electric St. Francis Electric Sand Channel Drainage Colony Landscape Colony Landscape Colony Landscape Colony Landscape Scorekeepers Booth Public Restroom Company The Public Restroom Public Restroom Company Landscape and Irrigation Marina Landscape Marina Landscape Reinforcing Steel Camblin Steel Signage Express Sign and Neon Frank and Sons Inc. Express Sign and Neon Earthwork and Paving Cotart Goodfellows Drainage Preston Pipelines Platinum Pipelines Concrete TNB Construction R and R Maher Pavers European Paving Designs Scoreboard ABV Scoreboard Services 1 125 Attachment 4 126 127 128 Attachment 5 129 130 Agenda Item 4.6 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Acceptance of Donations from the Bilich Family/Preferred Financial Group Prepared by: Nate Schmidt, Captain Dublin Police Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider acceptance of a donation of $1,000 from the Bilich Family/ Preferred Financial Group to be used for equipment, operating supplies, and training for the Crime Prevention Unit of Dublin Police Services. The City Council will also present the group with a Certificate of Appreciation for the donation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Accept the donation and recognize the Bilich Family/Preferred Financial Group. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Upon acceptance of the donation, Staff will reflect the $1,000 in the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Police Services Budget revenues and expenditures. DESCRIPTION: In January 2021, Dublin Police Services received a check in the amount of $1,000 from Anthony and Angela Bilich and their company Preferred Financial Group. This donation from the Bilich Family will be best suited for use by the Crime Prevention Unit to enhance community-related crime prevention programs. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The donors have been invited to attend the City Council meeting and the City Council Agenda was posted. Page 1 of 2 131 ATTACHMENTS: 1) Bilich Family Certification of Recognition Page 2 of 2 132 Attachment 1 CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION Presented to Bilich Family/Preferred Financial Group In Special Recognition and Appreciation for Your Generous Grant of $1,000 Supporting the Dublin Police Crime Prevention Unit to Enhance Community- Related Programs. Presented by the City Council of the City of Dublin February 16, 2021 ______Mayor Melissa Hernandez Vice Mayor Shawn Kumagai ______Councilmember Jean Josey Councilmember Sherry Hu Councilmember Michael McCorriston 133 Agenda Item 6.1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Kent Property General Plan Amendment and Rezoning (PLPA-2019-00002) Prepared by: Robert Smith, Associate Planner EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will consider a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning of a 1.5-acre property located at 6207 Sierra Court known as the Kent property. The proposal includes an amendment to the General Plan land use designation of the property from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and an associated Rezone from M-1 (Light Industrial) to C-2 (General Commercial). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City prepared an Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the proposed project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Open the Public Hearing and: 1) Adopt the Resolution Adopting the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and Amending the General Plan Land Use Designation at 6207 Sierra Court from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive; and 2) Waive Reading and INTRODUCE the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map for Property Located at 6207 Sierra Court from M-1 to C-2. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with the proposed project except the cost of staff and consultant time to process this application. DESCRIPTION: Background The 1.5-acre Kent property is located at the northeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court as shown in Figure 1 and is currently developed with an existing 16,117-square-foot one-story building with an existing commercial use. The property is currently designated Business Park/Industrial in the City’s General Plan and is within the M-1 zoning district as shown in Figures 2 and 3 below. Page 1 of 7 134 Figure 1: Vicinity Map Figure 2. Existing General Plan Land Use Page 2 of 7 135 Figure 3. Existing Zoning Map The property is generally surrounded by light industrial uses to the north, public/semi-public uses to the south (Dublin Civic Center and Dublin Sports Ground), and retail/office/automotive uses to the east and west, as shown in Table 1. Table 1. Adjacent Uses Existing Use Land Use Designations North Charmet Tile (flooring store) McGoldrick Milling Business Park/Industrial Company, Inc. (building materials supplier) South Dublin Sports Grounds, Dublin Civic Center Parks/Public Recreation and Public/Semi-Public East Dublin City Center Shopping Center (Sahara Market, Retail/Office and Sahara Kabob Grill, Funks Autoworks, Russian School Automotive of Mathematics, and Harvey’s Cleaners) West NAPA Auto Parts California Custom Carpets, Inc. Retail/Office On February 15, 2019, the City Council adopted a Resolution approving the initiation of a General Plan Amendment Study to evaluate changing the land use designation of the approximately 1.5- acre site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive to allow for commercial uses similar to the neighboring properties to the east and west along Dublin Boulevard. The property owner originally requested the initiation of this amendment to provide greater flexibility in re-tenanting the then-vacant building. The property owner subsequently signed a lease. However, the City continued to process the application as an economic development tool to provide flexibility for future use of the building. Page 3 of 7 136 Proposal The following are the proposed project approvals as set out in the City Council Resolution and Ordinance (Attachments 1 and 2): • General Plan Amendment from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive; and • Rezone from Light Industrial (M-1) to General Commercial (C-2). As described above, the project site is already developed and no new improvements are currently proposed. Analysis The current General Plan land use designation of Business Park/Industrial allows for non-retail businesses (e.g., research, limited manufacturing and distribution activities, and administrative offices) that do not involve heavy trucking or generate nuisances due to emissions, noise or open uses. The proposed General Plan land use designation of Retail/Office and Automotive allows general commercial, retail and service uses, and typically includes shopping centers, stores, restaurants, business and professional offices, motels, service stations, and the sale of auto parts, as well as automobile/vehicle sales and service, auto body shops, and similar auto-focused uses. The current M-1 zoning is compatible with the current General Plan land use and allows light industrial uses in proximity to major transportation corridors. Use types permitted in the M-1 zoning district include ambulance service, laboratory, office, parking lot/garage, light industrial, printing and publishing, research and development, trucking terminal, warehousing and distribution, and similar, related uses as well as accessory restaurant and retail uses. The proposed C-2 zoning district is compatible with the proposed General Plan land use and would allow commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections. Examples of permitted uses include banks and financial institutions, building material sales, car wash/detailing, copying and blueprinting, drive-in/drive-through business, health services/clinics, hotel/motel, hospital/medical center, personal services, plant nursery, repair shop, retail, shopping center, and similar related uses. The proposed General Plan Land Use Map and proposed Zoning Map are shown in Figures 4 and 5 below. Page 4 of 7 137 Figure 4. Proposed General Plan Land Use Figure 5. Proposed Zoning Map PD Reso. 35-85 Page 5 of 7 138 The proposed amendment to the General Plan land use designation and Rezone would be compatible with existing commercial development and the neighborhood character of the area. Additionally, the existing building design is not well suited for many of today’s light industrial users with large store front and customer parking facing Dublin Boulevard. Both the design of the building and its location have drawn interest predominantly from commercial users. The proposed change in land use and zoning would respond to the market and the existing building and better facilitate use of the existing site. The project site is currently occupied by an existing commercial business, which modified its commercial operation in order to comply with the currently M-1 zoning and offers only a limited showroom. Amending the General Plan and Zoning Map would provide added flexibility to this business and future businesses to offer a robust retail component to their operation. With implementation of the General Plan Amendment and Rezone, the property would be allowed expanded land uses and an opportunity to provide complementary commercial activity consistent with its location along Dublin Boulevard. Consistency with General Plan, Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance The proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan in that it recognizes that there will be a natural evolution of land uses and land use changes over time. The proposed General Plan Amendment would be consistent with nearby commercial land uses and would create continuity of uses with surrounding properties along Dublin Boulevard. The project site is not located within a specific plan. In addition, the proposed Rezone would be consistent with the intent of the C-2 zoning district, which provides for the continued use, expansion, and new development of general commercial use types along major transportation corridors and intersections, such as Dublin Boulevard. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and when applicable, environmental documents be prepared. The City’s environmental consultant, LSA, prepared an Initial Study in accordance with CEQA requirements. Based on the Initial Study (IS), the City determined that the proposed project would not have a significant impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared. The IS/ND is attached as Exhibit A to Attachment 1 (Attachment 3) of this Staff Report. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider this project at their regular meeting on January 26, 2021. No members of the public addressed the Commission on this item. On a 4-1 vote, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 21-01, recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed project and related Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission Resolution recommending approval of the project is included in Attachment 4. Page 6 of 7 139 STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: In accordance with State law, a public notice was published in the East Bay Times and posted at City Hall. The public notice was provided to all persons who have expressed an interest in being notified of meetings. The Staff Report for this public hearing was also made available on the City’s website. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution Adopting the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and Amending the General Plan Land Use Designation at 6207 Sierra Court 2) Exhibit A to the Resolution - Initial Study, Negative Declaration 3) Ordinance Amending the Zoning Map for Property Located at 6207 Sierra Court 4) Planning Commission Resolution No. 21-01 Page 7 of 7 140 Attachment 1 RESOLUTION NO. xx-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN ADOPTING THE INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AT 6207 SIERRA COURT FROM BUSINESS PARK/INDUSTRIAL TO RETAIL/OFFICE AND AUTOMOTIVE (APN 941-0205-013-04) PLPA-2019-00002 WHEREAS, the 1.5-acre Project site is located at 6207 Sierra Court at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court (APNs 941-0205-013-04); and WHEREAS, the existing General Plan land use designation for the Project site is Business Park/Industrial and the City proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation to Retail/Office and Automotive; and WHEREAS, the Project also includes a companion Rezoning of the Project site from M-1 (Light Industrial) to C-2 (General Commercial); and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and that environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study (IS) for the proposed project, which found that there was no substantial evidence that the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning would have a significant adverse effect on the environment and, therefore, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared a Negative Declaration (ND), dated January 2021, which reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and WHEREAS, the IS/ND was circulated for 20 days for public comment from January 6, 2021 to January 26, 2021; and WHEREAS, no comments were received on the IS/ND; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing on January 26, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 21-01, recommending adoption of the IS/ND, and approval of the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours; and WHEREAS, a Staff Report, dated February 16, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and associated environmental review, for the City Council; and WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code and Section 21080.3.1 of the Public Resource Code, the City obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission and notified the tribes on the Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 1 of 3 141 Attachment 1 contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on the proposed General Plan Amendment and IS/ND. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation within the statutory consultation periods and no further action is required; and WHEREAS, on February 16, 2021, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, including the proposed General Plan Amendment, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council did hear and use independent judgment and considered all said reports, recommendations, and testimony hereinabove set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, attached as Exhibit A, based on the following findings: 1. The City Council considered the IS/ND and public comments prior to taking action on the project. 2. The City Council finds, on the basis of the whole record before it, including the IS/ND and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project will have a significant impact on the environment. 3. The IS/ND reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis as to the potential environmental effects of the proposed General Plan Amendment. 4. The IS/ND has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council finds that the General Plan Amendment, as set forth below, is in the public interest, will promote general health, safety and welfare, and that the General Plan as amended will remain internally consistent. The proposed Project is consistent with the guiding and implementing policies of the General Plan in each of the elements and will allow for Retail/Office and Automotive uses. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the following amendment to the General Plan: Figure 1-1 (Dublin General Plan Land Use Map) shall be amended to change the land use designation for the Project site to Retail/Office and Automotive as shown below: Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 2 of 3 142 Attachment 1 Retail/Office and Automotive PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______Mayor ATTEST: ______City Clerk 3668427.1 Reso. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 3 of 3 143 Attachment 2 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION KENT PROPERTY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING 6207 SIERRA COURT, DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA January 2021 144 This page intentionally left blank 145 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/ NEGATIVE DECLARATION KENT PROPERTY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING 6207 SIERRA COURT, DUBLIN, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Robert Smith, Associate Planner City of Dublin 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, California 94568 Prepared by: LSA 157 Park Place Pt. Richmond, California 94801 510.236.6810 LSA Project No. DUB1601.01 City Application No. PLPA‐2019‐00002 January 2021 146 This page intentionally left blank 147 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...... i FIGURES AND TABLES ...... ii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...... iii 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION ...... 1‐1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ...... 2‐1 2.1 Determination ...... 2‐1 3.0 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ...... 3‐1 3.1 Aesthetics ...... 3‐1 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ...... 3‐3 3.3 Air Quality ...... 3‐6 3.4 Biological Resources ...... 3‐13 3.5 Cultural Resources ...... 3‐17 3.6 Energy ...... 3‐19 3.7 Geology and Soils ...... 3‐22 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...... 3‐27 3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...... 3‐31 3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ...... 3‐35 3.11 Land Use and Planning ...... 3‐39 3.12 Mineral Resources ...... 3‐42 3.13 Noise...... 3‐43 3.14 Population and Housing ...... 3‐46 3.15 Public Services ...... 3‐48 3.16 Recreation ...... 3‐50 3.17 Transportation ...... 3‐51 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources ...... 3‐54 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems ...... 3‐56 3.20 Wildfire ...... 3‐58 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance ...... 3‐60 4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS ...... 4‐1 5.0 REFERENCES ...... 5‐1 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) i 148 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Figure 1: Regional Location ...... 1‐2 Figure 2: Aerial View of the Project Site and Surrounding Uses ...... 1‐3 Figure 3: General Plan Land Use Designations ...... 1‐4 TABLES Table A: Development Regulations ...... 1‐6 Table B: Adjacent Land Uses ...... 1‐7 Table C: Potential Change in Trip Generation ...... 3‐52 ii P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 149 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACDEH Alameda County Department of Environmental Health ACFD Alameda County Fire Department APN Assessor’s Parcel Number BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District Basin Plan Water Quality Control Plan CalFire California Department of Fire and Forestry Protection CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code C‐2 General Commercial CAP 2030 City of Dublin Climate Action Plan 2030 and Beyond CBC California Building Code CDMG California Department of Mines and Geology CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CH4 Methane City City of Dublin Clean Air Plan Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2017 Clean Air Plan CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e CO2 equivalents P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) iii 150 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CUPA Certified Unified Program Agency dB decibel dBA A‐weighted (sound level) decibels DMC Dublin Municipal Code ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System EFZs Earthquake Fault Zones FAR Floor Area Ratio FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG Greenhouse gas GPA General Plan Amendment GWP Global Warming Potential HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons I‐680 Interstate 680 I‐580 Interstate 580 IS/ND Initial Study/ Negative Declaration LID Low Impact Development LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank M‐1 Light Industrial MMI Modified Mercalli Index MRP San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Municipal Regional Permit N2O Nitrous oxide NAHC California Native American Heritage Commission NO2 nitrogen dioxide iv P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 151 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 NOx Nitrogen oxide NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O3 ozone OPR Office of Planning and Research Pb lead PFCs Perfluorocarbons PM particulate matter PM10 respirable particulate matter PM2.5 fine particulate matter POTWs publicly owned treatment works PPV peak particle velocity ROG Reactive organic gases SCP Stormwater Control Plan SF6 Sulfur Hexafluoride SLIC spills, leaks, investigations, and cleanups SO2 sulfur dioxide SRA State responsibility area SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TACs toxic air contaminants TCE trichloroethylene USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service VMT vehicle miles traveled Water Board San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) v 152 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank vi P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 153 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Project Title: Kent Property General Plan Amendment and Rezoning (City Application No. PLPA‐2019‐00002) 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Dublin Community Development Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Robert Smith, Associate Planner (925) 833‐6610 [email protected] 4. Project Location: The project site is located at 6207 Sierra Court at the northeast corner of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court in Dublin, Alameda County, California (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 941‐0205‐ 13‐4). Regional access to the project site is provided by Interstates 580 (I‐580) and 680 (I‐680), which are located approximately 0.5‐mile south and west of the project site, respectively. Local access to the project site is provided by Sierra Court. Figure 1, on Page 1‐2, depicts the regional and local context of the project site. Figure 2, on Page 1‐3, is an aerial view of the project site and its vicinity. 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: City of Dublin Community Development Department 100 Civic Plaza Dublin, CA 94568 6. Existing General Plan Designation: Business Park/Industrial 7. Existing Zoning: M‐1 (Light Industrial) 8. Description of Project: Existing Use. The project site consists of an approximately 1.5‐acre (66,122‐square‐foot) property located at 6207 Sierra Court in the City of Dublin. The site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot one‐story building that includes an existing commercial use. The site is currently designated Business Park/Industrial in the City’s General Plan and is within the M‐1 (Light Industrial) zoning district. The existing General Plan land use designations for the project site and surrounding properties are shown on Figure 3, on Page 1‐4. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 1‐1 154 Project Site Project Location FIGURE 1 Kent Property General Plan Amendment 0 500 1000 Dublin, Alameda County, California FEET Regional Location SOURCE: ESRI World Street Map (03/20). I:\DUB1601\GIS\Maps\Figure 1_Regional Location.mxd (9/4/2020) 155 d v l FIGURE 2 B n i l b u Dublin Blvd D BUSINESS PARK/ BUSINESS Rd INDUSTRIAL/STORAGE rty he ug DoughertyDo Rd Kent Property General Plan Amendment Kent l P n o t s u o Houston Pl Houston H MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DoughertyDougherty RRdd RETAIL St Land Uses and Surrounding Site Aerial View of the Project ay BayB St ee tr r n D a BantreeB e g a l lage Dr Dr lage lage l i V 580 e e Vil Vil e e e l t a r e rtr e Trale T Trale n u n a o a L C L A daar n y re L t a i r n r i e r i TrinityT CouCourt S t r u o d C a r v r e l i ierra Court Court ierra ierra S S S B n i l b u DublinD Blvd INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK/ BUSINESS DUBLIN SPORTS GROUNDS DUBLIN SPORTS l l i i a a r r a a T T l l z z a a n n a a a a C C Can l l o o o m m a a P P l l A A c c i i v v i i n L C C e c ce Ln Ln ce ce u r p Spru S Spru COMMERCIAL CIVIC DUBLIN CENTER r r D D n n n n e e P P n L r DUBLIN LIBRARY a d e n CedarC Ln L l l i i a g a r r Site Project T r T l u l a a i b i n s n INDUSTRIAL n n e e n e t t v A n e n PARK/ BUSINESS k e e b r a l C C Clark Ave Ave Clark C Clark EbensburgE Ln COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL VALLEY d v l B n i r M l D ap b k le Dr u r D Yo d d y v v l l kw B B P e y y ag 600 e e l l l l i 680 l l VillageV Pkwy a a V V r r o o d d a a m m A A RETAIL 0 300 FEET SOURCES: Google Earth, 6/20/19; LSA, 2020 Google Earth, SOURCES: 2.ai (9/1/2020) GPA\PRODUCTS\Graphics\Figure Property P:\DUB1601.01 Kent 156 Legend General Plan Land Use Parks/ Public Recreation Open Space Stream Corridor Public Lands Public / Semi-Public Semi-Public Downtown Dublin - Village Parkway District Downtown Dublin - Transit-Oriented District Downtown Dublin - Retail District Dublin Crossing General Commercial Retail/Office Retail/Office and Automotive Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial/Campus Office Campus Office Industrial Park Business Park/Industrial Business Park/Industrial and Outdoor Storage Mixed Use Mixed Use 2/Campus Office Medical Campus Medical Campus / Commercial Rural Residential/Agriculture (1 Unit per 100 Gross Residential Acres) Medium/High-Density Residential and Retail Office Estate Residential (0.01 - 0.8 du/ac) Low-Density Single Family (0.5 - 3.8 du/ac) Single Family Residential (0.9 - 6.0 du/ac) Medium-Density Residential (6.1 - 14.0 du/ac) Medium/High-Density Residential (14.1 - 25.0 du/ac) High-Density Residential (25.1+ du/ac) This map is based on City of Dublin GIS Informa on and reflects the most current informa on at the me of this prin ng. The map is intended for reference purposes only and the City and its staff is not responsible for errors. FIGURE 3 2,460 0 1,230 2,460 Feet 0 1,230 2,460 Project Site FEET Kent Property General Plan Amendment SOURCE: City of Dublin, 2020 General Plan Land Use DesignaƟons 157 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\Graphics\Figure 3.ai (9/2/2020) P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 According to the City’s General Plan, the Business Park/Industrial land use designation allows for non‐retail businesses (e.g., research, limited manufacturing and distribution activities, and administrative offices) that do not involve heavy trucking, or generate nuisances due to emissions, noise or open uses. Permitted floor area ratio (FAR) ranges from 0.30 to 0.40 and the allowable employee density is 360 to 490 square feet per employee. The M‐1 zoning district is intended to provide for the continued use, expansion and new development of light industrial use types in proximity to major transportation corridors and to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential and commercial uses. Permitted uses in the M‐1 zoning district include ambulance service, laboratory, office, parking lot/garage, light industrial, printing and publishing, research and development, trucking terminal, warehousing and distribution, and similar related uses. Proposed Land Use. The City is initiating a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive representing a natural evolution of land uses and land use changes over time, creating continuity along Dublin Boulevard between the project site, and neighboring properties to the east. The site would also be rezoned from M‐1 (Light Industrial) to C‐2 (General Commercial) consistent with the amended General Plan land use designation. As described above, the project site is already developed and no new development (i.e., demolition, construction, or change in site access) is currently proposed. The Retail/Office and Automotive designation allows general commercial, retail and service uses and typically includes shopping centers, stores, restaurants, business and professional offices, motels, service stations, and the sale of auto parts, as well as, automobile/vehicle sales and service, auto body shops, and similar auto‐focused uses. Permitted FAR ranges from 0.25 to 0.50 and the allowable employee density is 220 to 490 square feet per employee. The C‐2 zoning district is intended to provide for the continued use, expansion, and new development of general commercial use types along major transportation corridors and intersections, and to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential and commercial uses. With implementation of the GPA and Rezoning, permitted uses for the project site that are not currently allowed under the existing zoning, would include: adult business establishment (with Conditional Use Permit [CUP]), banks and financial institutions, building material sales, car wash/detailing (with CUP), copying and blueprinting, health services/clinics, hotel/motel (with CUP), hospital/medical center (with CUP), massage establishment, personal services, plant nursery (with CUP), repair shop, retail‐ general, retail – neighborhood, retail – outdoor storage (with CUP), retail ‐ service, shopping center, tobacco retailer (with Zoning Clearance) and similar related uses. Maximum Development. Table A shows the development regulations that apply to the existing (M‐1) and proposed (C‐2) zoning districts, as defined in Dublin Municipal Code (DMC) Chapter 8.36.030 Commercial and Industrial Development Regulations. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 1‐5 158 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Under the current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the maximum development footprint on the site could include a 26,448‐square foot, one‐story building, which would generate a maximum of 73 employees at the maximum employment density (approximately 10,000 square feet greater than the current use of the site). 1 A taller building would have a smaller development footprint in accordance with FAR requirements; however, the number of employees would be the same. Consistent with existing employee density requirements, the existing building supports approximately 44 employees.2 Table A: Development Regulations Existing Zoning District Proposed Zoning District Standard (M‐1) (C‐2) Lot Area Interior Lot 20,000 square feet 6,000 square feet Corner Lot 20,000 square feet 7,000 square feet Lot Width and Frontage Interior Lot 100 feet 50 feet Corner Lot 100 feet 60 feet Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet Setbacks Front 10 feet 0 feet Side 10 feet 0 feet Street Side 20 feet 0 feet Rear 20 feet 0 feet Height Limits 45 feet 45 feet Source: City of Dublin Municipal Code (2020). With implementation of the GPA and Rezoning, the maximum allowable development on the site could include a 33,061‐square foot, one‐story building, which would generate approxim‐ ately 150 employees at the maximum employment density (approximately 16,944 square feet greater than what currently exists and 6,613 square feet greater than what is currently allowed on the site).3 A taller building would have a smaller development footprint in accordance with FAR requirements; however, the number of employees would be the same. Based on the types of allowable uses under the proposed land use designation, the most intensive uses of the site may include a shopping center or restaurant. At the maximum employee density, the proposed project could increase employment at the site by approximately 106 employees. The analysis in Section 3.0, Environmental Checklist of this Initial Study considers the maximum development potential that would be allowed under the proposed GPA and rezoning, compared to existing conditions. 1 66,122 square feet x 0.4 = 26,448 square feet; 26,448/360 = 73 employees 2 16,117/360 = 44 employees 3 66,122 square feet x 0.5 = 33,061 square feet; 33,061/220 = 150 employees 1‐6 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 159 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Discretionary Approvals. As described above, the City has initiated a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive, and a Rezoning of the site from an M‐1 to C‐2 zoning district. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: As described above, the project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. The remainder of the site consists of paved parking. Landscaping, including shrubs, turf, and several mature trees, are located along Sierra Court. The site is generally surrounded by industrial uses to the north, public/semi‐public uses to the south, and retail, office, automotive uses to the east and west. Surrounding land uses are shown in Table B below. Table B: Adjacent Land Uses Existing Use Land Use Designation North Charmet Tile (flooring store Business Park/Industrial McGoldrick Milling Company Inc. (building materials supplier) South Dublin Sports Grounds, Dublin Civic Center Parks/Public Recreation East Dublin City Shopping Center (Sahara Market, Sahara Kabob Grill, Funks Retail/Office and Automotive Autoworks, Russian School of Mathematics, and Harvey’s Cleaners) West NAPA Auto Parts (auto parts store) Retail/Office California Custom Carpets, Inc. (carpet store) Source: City of Dublin (2020). 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financial approval, or participation agreements): N/A 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resource Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? On April 20, 2020, the City provided formal notification to those California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area within which the proposed project is located pursuant to the consultation requirements of SB 18 and AB 52. To date, no tribes have requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 1‐7 160 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank. 1‐8 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 161 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist in Section 3.0. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance 2.1 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “Potentially Significant Impact” or “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. 12/29/2020 Signature Date P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 2‐1 162 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank 2‐2 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 163 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.0 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 3.1 AESTHETICS Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway c. In non‐urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a. Would the project have a substantial effect on a scenic vista? (No Impact) Scenic vistas in Dublin consist of the ridgelines located in the open space area in the Western Extended Planning Area of the City. This area is generally accessed by Interstate 580 (I‐580) and Interstate 680 (I‐680), which are designated Alameda County scenic routes. In addition, San Ramon Road, Dougherty Road, and Tassajara Road are designated scenic routes. Per the City of Dublin General Plan policies, design review would be required for all project visible from a designated scenic route in order to enhance a positive image of Dublin as seen by through travelers. The project site is located in a generally level area, approximately two miles east of the open space areas/ridgelines associated with the Western Extended Planning Area. The project site is not visible from any of these County‐ or City‐designated scenic routes. The site is not located in an area considered to be within a scenic vista. The project site is currently developed with a single‐story 16,117‐square‐foot building, associated surface parking lot, and landscaped areas. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow general commercial, retail and service uses, as well as auto‐focused uses in an already developed area and would not result in any physical changes to the project site. Although potential future development on the project site may be visible from scenic viewpoints, applicable height restrictions would apply, and new construction would be governed by existing regulations that apply to development within this area. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would not result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista and no impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐1 164 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (No Impact) The closest officially designated State scenic highways to the project area and project site are I‐680 and I‐580, which are located approximately 0.4 mile west and 0.2 mile south of the project site, respectively. Due to intervening development, the project area and project site are not visible from these scenic roadways. As described above, San Ramon Road, Dougherty Road, and Tassajara Road are designated scenic routes. The project site is not located along any of these County‐ or City‐designated scenic routes. As discussed above in Section 3.1.a, the proposed project would not result in any physical improve‐ ments to the site and future development projects on the project site would be governed by City regulations for the amended land use designation and zoning district. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in substantial changes to scenic resources within view of a State scenic highway or scenic corridor and no impact would occur. c. In non‐urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? (No Impact) Implementation of the proposed project would allow general commercial, retail, and service uses, as well as auto‐focused uses in an already developed area and no physical improvements to the project site would occur. Any potential future development project proposed at the project site would be reviewed based on, among other things, the effect on the visual character of the site and surroun‐ dings as a part of the City’s permit process. New structures would be evaluated for compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance, including height and setback requirements and other design controls. Compliance with the City’s applicable regulations would ensure that any future development of the project site would not result in a substantial adverse effect on the visual character or quality of the project site and no impact would occur. d. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (No Impact) The proposed project is located in an industrial area with existing lighting consisting of security and streetlights. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow general commercial, retail and service uses, as well as auto‐focused uses in an already developed area and no physical site improvements to the project site would occur. Potential future development of the project site would be reviewed based on, among other things, exterior lighting that could affect surrounding views, as part of the City’s permit process. Any lighting associated with potential future development at the project site would be consistent with City standard lighting requirements in the project area and no impact would occur. 3‐2 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 165 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and the forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non‐ agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non‐forest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non‐agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non‐forest use? a. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non‐agricultural use? (No Impact) The project site is not used for agricultural production and is not designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance on maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency. 4 The surrounding area is characterized by industrial, public/semi‐public, retail, office, and automotive uses. Furthermore, the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program categorizes the project site as Urban and Built‐Up Land by, which is defined as land that is occupied by structures with a building density of at least one unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately six structures to a 10‐acre parcel. Examples of 4 California Department of Conservation (DOC). California Farmland Conservancy. California Important Farmland Finder. Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/ (accessed August 27, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐3 166 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Urban and Built‐Up Land include residential, industrial, commercial, institutional facilities, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, and water control structures.5 Therefore, the proposed project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or any other type of farmland to non‐agricultural uses. No impacts to Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would occur. b. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (No Impact) The project site is currently classified as M‐1 on the City’s Zoning Map. With implementation of the proposed project, the site zoning would change to C‐2. Neither of these zoning districts allow for agricultural uses. The project site is not currently used for agricultural purposes, not zoned for agricultural uses, and is not protected by, or eligible for, a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning or Williamson Act contracts. No impacts would occur. c. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? (No Impact) As described above, the project site is zoned M‐1 and would be Rezoned to C‐2 with implementation of the proposed project. The project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. Neither the project site nor the surrounding area is zoned as forest land, timberland, or timberland production. No impacts would occur. d. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forestland to non‐forest use? (No Impact) The project site is located in an area of the City that is characterized by an urban setting. No forest or timberland exists on the project site or in the surrounding area. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non‐forest use. No impacts would occur. e. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non‐agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non‐forest use? (No Impact) The project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. The proposed project would result in a change to the General Plan land use designation and zoning classification of the site, to allow for uses such as retail, office and automotive, similar to the neighboring properties to the east. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of farmland on or off the project site to non‐agricultural uses because there are no agricultural uses on or in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Likewise, the proposed project 5 Ibid. 3‐4 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 167 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 would not result in impacts related to changes in the existing environment that could result in the conversion of agricultural land to non‐agricultural uses. No impacts would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐5 168 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.3 AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non‐ attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? a. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The project site is located in the City of Dublin, which is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, a large shallow air basin ringed by hills that taper into a number of sheltered valleys around the perimeter. The City of Dublin is within the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), which regulates air quality in the San Francisco Bay Area. Air quality conditions in the San Francisco Bay Area have improved significantly since the BAAQMD was created in 1955. Ambient concentrations of air pollutants and the number of days during which the region exceeds air quality standards have fallen substantially. In Dublin, and the rest of the air basin, exceedances of air quality standards occur primarily during meteorological conditions conducive to high pollution levels, such as cold, windless winter nights or hot, sunny summer afternoons. Within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), and lead (Pb) have been set by both the State of California and the federal government. The State has also set standards for sulfate and visibility. The Air Basin is under State non‐attainment status for ozone and particulate matter standards. The Air Basin is classified as non‐attainment for the federal ozone 8‐hour standard and non‐attainment for the federal PM2.5 24‐hour standard. The applicable air quality plan is the BAAQMD 2017 Clean Air Plan (Clean Air Plan),6 which was adopted on April 19, 2017. The Clean Air Plan is a comprehensive plan to improve Bay Area air quality and protect public health. The Clean Air Plan defines control strategies to reduce emissions and ambient concentrations of air pollutants; safeguard public health by reducing exposure to air pollutants that pose the greatest heath risk, with an emphasis on protecting the communities most 6 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. Clean Air Plan. April 19. 3‐6 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 169 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 heavily affected by air pollution; and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to protect the climate. Consistency with the Clean Air Plan can be determined if the project: 1) supports the goals of the Clean Air Plan; 2) includes applicable control measures from the Clean Air Plan; and 3) would not disrupt or hinder implementation of any control measures from the Clean Air Plan. Clean Air Plan Goals. The primary goals of the Clean Air Plan are to attain air quality standards; reduce population exposure and protect public health in the Bay Area; and reduce GHG emissions and protect climate. BAAQMD has established significance thresholds for project construction and operational impacts at a level at which the cumulative impact of exceeding these thresholds would have an adverse impact on the region’s attainment of air quality standards. The health and hazards thresholds were established to help protect public health. As discussed below the proposed project would result in less than significant construction‐ and operation‐period emissions. Therefore, the project would not conflict with the Clean Air Plan goals. Clean Air Plan Control Measures. The control strategies of the Clean Air Plan include measures in the following categories: Stationary Source Measures, Transportation Measures, Energy Measures, Building Measures, Agriculture Measures, Natural and Working Lands Measures, Waste Management Measures, Water Measures, and Super‐GHG Pollutants Measures. The following sections describe the Clean Air Plan control strategy measures: Stationary Source Control Measures. The stationary source measures, which are designed to reduce emissions from stationary sources such as metal melting facilities, cement kilns, refineries, and glass furnaces, are incorporated into rules adopted by the BAAQMD and then enforced by the BAAQMD’s Permit and Inspection programs. Since the project would not include any stationary sources, the Stationary Source Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan are not applicable to the project. Transportation Control Measures. BAAQMD identifies transportation measures as part of the Clean Air Plan to decrease emissions of criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and GHGs by reducing demand for motor vehicle travel, promoting efficient vehicles and transit service, decarbonizing transportation fuels, and electrifying motor vehicles and equipment. The proposed project includes a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and Rezoning from M‐1 to C‐2 to be consistent with the land use designation. No new development is proposed at this time. As discussed in Section 3.17, Transportation, any future proposals to redevelop the site would require discretionary review by the City and the land use proposed at that time would be subject to review. If a specific proposed land use is found to have the potential to affect vehicle level of service or vehicle miles traveled, project features such as travel demand management measures could be implemented to preserve vehicle level of service. In addition, retail/commercial or restaurant uses that would be allowed with the proposed GPA and Rezoning may attract many of their trips from traffic already on the adjacent roadway. As such, the proposed project would not hinder BAAQMD’s initiatives to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐7 170 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Energy Control Measures. The Clean Air Plan also includes Energy Control Measures, which are designed to reduce emissions of criteria air pollutants, TACs, and GHGs by decreasing the amount of electricity consumed in the Bay Area, as well as decreasing the carbon intensity of the electricity used by switching to less GHG‐intensive fuel sources for electricity generation. Since these measures apply to electrical utility providers and local government agencies (and not individual projects), the energy control measures of the Clean Air Plan are not applicable to the project. Building Control Measures. BAAQMD has authority to regulate emissions from certain sources in buildings such as boilers and water heaters but has limited authority to regulate buildings themselves. Therefore, the strategies in the control measures for this sector focus on working with local governments that do have authority over local building codes, to facilitate adoption of best GHG control practices and policies. The proposed project would not include construction of any new buildings. Therefore, the Building Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan are not applicable to the project. Agriculture Control Measures. The agriculture measures are designed primarily to reduce emissions of methane. Since the project does not include any agricultural activities, the Agriculture Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan are not applicable to the project. Natural and Working Lands Control Measures. The natural and working lands measures focus on increasing carbon sequestration on rangelands and wetlands, as well as encouraging local governments to enact ordinances that promote urban‐tree plantings. Since the project does not include the disturbance of any rangelands or wetlands, the Natural and Working Lands Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan are not applicable to the project. Waste Management Control Measures. The waste management measures focus on reducing or capturing methane emissions from landfills and composting facilities, diverting organic materials away from landfills, and increasing waste diversion rates through efforts to reduce, reuse, and recycle. The project would comply with local requirements for waste management (e.g., recycling and composting services). Therefore, the project would be consistent with the Waste Management Control Measures of the Clean Air Plan. Water Control Measures. The water measures focus on reducing emissions of criteria pollutants, TACs, and GHGs by encouraging water conservation, limiting GHG emissions from publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), and promoting the use of biogas recovery systems. Since these measures apply to POTWs and local government agencies (and not individual projects), the Water Control Measures are not applicable to the project. Super GHG Control Measures. The Super‐GHG measures are designed to facilitate the adoption of best GHG control practices and policies through BAAQMD and local government agencies. Since these measures do not apply to individual projects, the Super‐GHG Control Measures are not applicable to the project. 3‐8 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 171 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Clean Air Plan Implementation. As discussed above, implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with any of the measures outlined in the Clean Air Plan. Therefore, the project would not disrupt or hinder implementation of a control measure from the Clean Air Plan. In addition, as discussed below, implementation of the project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed BAAQMD thresholds of significance. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable air quality plans. This impact would be less than significant. b. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non‐attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Both State and federal governments have established health‐based Ambient Air Quality Standards for six criteria air pollutants: CO, ozone (O3), NO2, SO2, Pb, and suspended particulate matter (PM). These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. As identified above, the Air Basin is under State non‐attainment status for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 standards. The Air Basin is also classified as non‐attainment for both the federal ozone 8‐hour standard and the federal PM2.5 24‐hour standard. Air quality standards for the proposed project are regulated by the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. According to the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, to meet air quality standards for operational‐related criteria air pollutant and air precursor impacts, the project must not: Contribute to CO concentrations exceeding the State ambient air quality standards; Generate average daily construction emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx) or PM2.5 greater than 54 pounds per day or PM10 exhaust emissions greater than 82 pounds per day; or Generate average operational emissions of ROG, NOx or PM2.5 of greater than 10 tons per year or 54 pounds per day or PM10 emissions greater than 15 tons per year or 82 pounds per day. The following sections describe the proposed project’s construction‐ and operation‐related air quality impacts and CO impacts. Construction Emissions. The proposed project includes a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and a Rezoning of the site from M‐1 to C‐2. The project site is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No new building is currently proposed to replace the existing building. Under current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum of a 26,448‐square‐foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet of building area with up to 150 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐9 172 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 employees. This is an increase of approximately 6,600 square feet and 77 employees compared to the maximum that is currently allowed on the site. For regional shopping center and high turnover restaurant land uses (the most intensive use that could be developed under the proposed GPA and Rezoning), BAAQMD’s screening size for construction criteria pollutants is 277,000 square feet. Since the proposed project would allow for a maximum of 33,061 square feet, based on BAAQMD’s screening criteria, the potential increase in intensity of use on the site is not anticipated to exceed established thresholds. Therefore, any future construction activities at the project site would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards (AAQS). Operational Emissions. Long‐term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with mobile sources (e.g., vehicle trips), energy sources (e.g., electricity and natural gas), and area sources (e.g., architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment) related to the proposed project. PM10 emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways. Entrainment of PM10 occurs when vehicle tires pulverize small rocks and pavement, and the vehicle wakes generate airborne dust. The contribution of tire and brake wear is small compared to the other PM emission processes. Gasoline‐powered engines have small rates of particulate matter emissions compared with diesel‐ powered vehicles. Energy source emissions result from activities in buildings for which electricity and natural gas are used. The quantity of emissions is the product of usage intensity (i.e., the amount of electricity or natural gas) and the emission factor of the fuel source. Major sources of energy demand include building mechanical systems, such as heating and air conditioning, lighting, and plug‐in electronics, such as refrigerators or computers. Greater building or appliance efficiency reduces the amount of energy for a given activity and thus lowers the resultant emissions. The emission factor is determined by the fuel source, with cleaner energy sources, like renewable energy, producing fewer emissions than conventional sources. Typically, area source emissions consist of direct sources of air emissions located at the project site, including architectural coatings and the use of landscape maintenance equipment. Area source emissions associated with the project would include emissions from the use of landscaping equipment and the use of consumer products. As discussed above, the proposed project includes a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and a Rezoning of the site from M‐1 to C‐2. The project site is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No new building is currently proposed to replace the existing building. Although no development is proposed at this time, under the current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum 26,448‐square‐foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet with up to 150 employees. This is an increase of approximately 6,600 square feet and 77 3‐10 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 173 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 employees compared to what is currently allowed on the site and approximately 16,900 square feet greater than what currently exists on the site. For regional shopping center land uses, BAAQMD’s screening size for operational criteria pollutants is 99,000 square feet. Since the proposed project would allow for a maximum of 33,061 square feet, based on BAAQMD’s screening criteria, the potential increase in intensity of use on the site is not anticipated to exceed established thresholds. Furthermore, the proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or State AAQS. Localized CO Impacts. Emissions and ambient concentrations of CO have decreased dramatically in the Bay Area with the introduction of the catalytic converter in 1975. No exceedances of the State or federal CO standards have been recorded at Bay Area monitoring stations since 1991. A screening level analysis using guidance from the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines was performed to determine the impacts of the project. The screening methodology provides a conservative indication of whether the implementation of a proposed project would result in significant CO emissions. According to the BAAQMD’s CEQA Guidelines, a proposed project would result in a less‐than‐significant impact to localized CO concentrations if the following screening criteria were met: The project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, and the regional transportation plan and local congestion management agency plans. Project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour. The project would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, or below‐grade roadway). Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with the Alameda County Transportation Commission requirement for designated roads or highways, a regional transportation plan, or other agency plans. The project site is not located in an area where vertical or horizontal mixing of air is substantially limited. As discussed further in Section 3.17, Transportation, changing the land use designation for the project site could result in approximately 54 more trips during the PM peak commute hour within the current building. The maximum development potential of the project site would be increased by approximately 115 vehicle trips during the PM peak commute hour. Therefore, the project would not increase traffic volumes at intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in localized CO concentrations that exceed State or federal standards and this impact would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐11 174 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 c. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less‐ Than‐Significant Impact) Sensitive receptors are defined as individuals that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include schools, day care centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential dwelling units. The closest sensitive receptors include the multi‐ family residences located approximately 550 feet east of the project site. The proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). Any future construction on the project site may expose nearby sensitive receptors to airborne particulates, as well as a small quantity of construction equipment pollutants (i.e., usually diesel‐fueled vehicles and equipment). However, construction contractors would be required to implement BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures and any future project construction emissions are expected to be below BAAQMD’s significance thresholds. In addition, based on the types of allowable uses under the proposed land use designation, the proposed land use would not be a source of substantial emissions. Therefore, sensitive receptors are not expected to be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations, and potential impacts would be considered less than significant. d. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). However, future construction on the project site may create localized odors associated with construction equipment in use on‐site. These odors would be temporary and are not likely to be noticeable for extended periods beyond the project site. The potential for diesel odor impacts is therefore considered less than significant. In addition, the proposed land use would not be a source of odors. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people, and potential impacts would be considered less than significant. 3‐12 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 175 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? a. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special‐status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (No Impact) The project site is located in a built‐out urban area and does not contain habitat that would support sensitive species; there are no known candidate, sensitive, or special‐status animal species on the site. Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report (Environmental Conservation Online System [ECOS])7 does not identify any locations of critical habitat within approximately two miles of the project site. The closest known critical habitat (California red‐legged frog [Rana draytonii]) is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the project site. 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System. Website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical‐habitat.html (accessed August 27, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐13 176 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not result in adverse effects to special‐status wildlife species. Therefore, no impacts to sensitive or special‐status species would result from project implementation. b. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (No Impact) The project site is currently developed and is located in an urban area. As noted in Response 3.4.a., the USFWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report (ECOS) does not identify any locations of critical habitat within approximately two miles of the project site. The closest known critical habitat is approximately 2.5 miles away to the west of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the proposed GPA and Rezoning would not result in adverse effects on a riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. c. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (No Impact) The project site is currently developed and is located in an urban area. Based on a review of site photographs and current and historical aerial images, the site does not contain any natural hydrologic features or State and/or federally protected wetlands. Therefore, implementation of the proposed GPA and Rezoning would have no impact on wetlands. d. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (No Impact) The project site is located in an urban area and is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No portion of the project site or immediately surrounding areas contains an open body of water that serves as natural habitat in which fish could exist. Alamo Creek runs in a north‐south direction just west of Dougherty Road, approximately 800 feet west of the project site. The portion of the creek in proximity to the project site has been channelized, consisting of a concrete‐lined drainage. Likewise, there is no established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor existing within or adjacent to the project site. Species that are found on the site either fly onto the site or are able to navigate through long stretches of urban development. Therefore, the project site does not contain any native resident or migratory fish, wildlife species, or wildlife corridors. Existing landscaping, including several mature trees, may provide suitable habitat for nesting birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, including nesting birds and there would be no impact. 3‐14 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 177 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Future development that could occur, as a result of the change in General Plan land use designation and zoning, would be subject to further environmental review and/or discretionary actions, depending on the nature of the proposed project. Such projects would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval for all development projects and could be subject to additional conditions and/or mitigation measures (in the event that further environmental review is required). Therefore, the proposed project would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites and no impact would occur. e. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (No Impact) Heritage trees and approved street trees are protected under the Dublin Municipal Code, specifically Sections 7.56, Street Trees, and 5.60, Heritage Trees. As defined in the Dublin Municipal Code, approved street trees include: 1. Any tree planted within any street right‐of‐way or adjacent easement, which conforms to the approved streetscape master plan; 2. Any existing tree within the right‐of‐way or adjacent easement, which conforms to the established species and location in any given area, and which was planted as a required street tree under the provisions of any improvement agreement, or as otherwise approved by the City; or 3. Any tree of the approved species and in an acceptable location, which was or may be planted as a replacement. Heritage trees include any of the following: 1. Any oak, bay, cypress, maple, redwood, buckeye and sycamore tree having a trunk or main stem of twenty‐four (24) inches or more in diameter measured at four (4) feet six (6) inches above natural grade. 2. A tree required to be preserved as part of an approved development plan, zoning permit, use permit, site development review, or subdivision map; 3. A tree required to be planted as a replacement for an unlawfully removed tree. A permit is required from the City for the removal of any heritage tree and the removal/pruning of any approved street tree. In addition, for any property containing one or more heritage trees, a plan to protect heritage trees must be prepared and submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐15 178 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not conflict with any policies to protect biological resources. Therefore, impacts to approved street trees or heritage trees would not occur. Future development that could occur as a result of the change in land use designation and zoning would be required to comply with the Dublin Municipal Code, which requires that a tree permit be obtained, and tree replacement be implemented, consistent with the City’s standard conditions of approval. f. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (No Impact) The project area is not subject to any adopted habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan and no impact would occur. 3‐16 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 179 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? (No Impact) For a cultural resource to be considered a historical resource (i.e., eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources), it generally must be 50 years or older. Under CEQA, historical resources can include precontact (i.e., Native American) archaeological deposits, historic‐period archaeological deposits, historic buildings, and historic districts. CEQA requires agencies considering projects that are subject to discretionary action to consider the potential impacts on cultural resources that may occur from project implementation (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5). The project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. The building is not listed on the Tri‐Valley Directory of Historical Resources and Places of Interest8, or in the City’s General Plan, nor is it considered a historical resource as defined by Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project, which would allow retail, office, and automotive uses on the project site, would not include any new construction, earthmoving, or changes to the exterior of the building or site. As described above the existing building on the site is not considered a historical resource as defined by §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines.9 Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a substantial change in the significance of a historic resource and no impact would occur. The project site has been previously disturbed and significantly altered as a result of past construction activities. Although no archaeological deposits that qualify as historical resources are known to occur on the project site, the potential for such resources cannot be discounted. Future development projects that would result in ground disturbance such as grading and excavation, which could unearth archaeological resources, would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process. Projects determined to potentially affect archaeologically sensitive areas 8 Tri‐Valley History Council. 2011. Tri‐Valley Directory of Historical Resources and Places of Interest. Available online at: www.cityoflivermore.net/civicax/filebank/documents/6884 (accessed September 1, 2020). 9 Ibid. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐17 180 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 may either be denied or subject to further environmental review and evaluation, including mitigation. b. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? (No Impact) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(1), “When a project will impact an archaeological site, a lead agency shall first determine whether the site is an historical resource.” Those archaeological sites that do not qualify as historical resources shall be assessed to determine if they qualify as “unique archaeological resources” pursuant to California Public Resource Code Section 21083.2. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses on the project site and would not include any earthmoving activities. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in adverse changes to the significance of archaeological resources at the project site and no impact would occur. As described in Response 3.5.a., future development projects at the site would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process. Such projects would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval for all development projects and could be subject to additional conditions and/or mitigation measures (in the event that further environmental review is required) to ensure that no impacts to archaeological resources would result from construction or operation of the proposed use. c. Would the project disturb any humans remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (No Impact) There are no known human remains at the project site. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses on the project site. This change in land use and zoning would not result in the disturbance of human remains that may be interred outside of a formal cemetery and no impact would occur. Future development projects that would result in ground disturbance such as grading, and excavation would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be required to comply with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 regarding the treatment of human remains. 3‐18 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 181 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.6 ENERGY Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? a. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Operation of future land uses on the site could result in a long‐term energy demand associated with the lighting and space heating/cooling, and vehicle travel. Typical construction activities also require the use of energy (e.g., electricity and fuel) for various purposes such as the operation of construction equipment and tools, as well as excavation, grading, demolition, and construction vehicle travel. Construction. The proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access); therefore, no construction‐period energy impacts would occur. Any future construction projects on the site would be reviewed on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval and existing government regulations, including BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures, to reduce air emissions and improve energy efficiency. Operation. Energy use is typically associated with natural gas use, electricity consumption, and fuel used for vehicle trips. The proposed project includes a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and a Rezoning of the site from M‐1 to C‐2. The project site is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No new development is currently proposed to replace the existing building. Under current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum of a 26,448‐square‐foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed General Plan and Zoning regulations would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet with up to 150 employees. This is an increase of approximately 6,600 square feet and approximately 77 employees compared to what is currently allowed on the site and approximately 16,900 square feet greater than what currently exists on the site. The proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). In addition, any future development would be constructed using energy efficient modern building materials and construction practices, in accordance with P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐19 182 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen), California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, and City standards. New buildings also would use new modern appliances and equipment. Under these requirements, future development would use environmentally sustainable building materials, building designs that reduce the amount of energy used in building heating and cooling systems as compared to conventionally built structures, and landscaping that incorporates water efficient irrigation systems, all of which would conserve energy. As such, the potential increase in intensity of use on the site compared to existing conditions is not expected to substantially increase long‐term operational energy usage at the project site compared to existing conditions. Therefore, implementation of the project would not result in a long‐term substantial demand for electricity, natural gas, or gasoline nor would the project require new service connections or construction of new off‐site service lines or substations to serve the project. The nature of the proposed project would not require substantial amounts of energy for amended uses and new physical development would be assessed based upon the merits of that project. Furthermore, the proposed project would not result in the wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of fuel or energy and would incorporate renewable energy or energy efficiency measures into building operation, equipment use, and transportation. Impacts would be less than significant. b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? (Less‐ Than‐Significant Impact) In 2002, the Legislature passed Senate Bill 1389, which required the California Energy Commission (CEC) to develop an integrated energy plan every two years for electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels, for the California Energy Policy Report. The plan calls for the State to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators in implementing incentive programs for zero emission vehicles and their infrastructure needs, and encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access. The most recently CEC adopted energy report is the 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report.10 The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs. The 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including implementation of Senate Bill 350, integrated resource planning, distributed energy resources, transportation electrification, solutions to increase resiliency in the electricity sector, energy efficiency, transportation electrification, barriers faced by disadvantaged communities, demand response, transmission and landscape‐scale planning, the California Energy Demand Preliminary Forecast, the preliminary transportation energy demand forecast, renewable gas (in response to 10 California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket # 19‐IEPR‐01. 3‐20 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 183 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Senate Bill 1383), updates on California electricity reliability, natural gas outlook, and climate adaptation and resiliency. As indicated above, the project site is located in an urbanized area and is currently developed. In addition, the proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). As such, the proposed project is not expected to substantially increase construction‐period or operational energy usage at the project site compared to existing conditions. Furthermore, the proposed project would not conflict with California’s energy conservation plans as described in the CEC’s 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. As such, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency and this impact would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐21 184 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? iii. Seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv. Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on‐ or off‐site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18‐1‐B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? a. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist‐Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (No Impact) Surface rupture occurs when the ground surface is broken due to fault movement during an earthquake. The location of surface rupture generally can be assumed to be along an active or potentially active major fault trace. The State of California enacted the Alquist‐Priolo Fault Zoning Act in 1972, requiring the State Geologist to delineate Earthquake Fault Zones (EFZs) along known active faults that have high potential for fault rupture. The project site is not located within a designated EFZ and the proposed 3‐22 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 185 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 project does not include any physical changes to the project site.11 Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving the rupture of a known earthquake fault. ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? (No Impact) The project site and the entire San Francisco Bay Area is in a seismically active region subject to strong seismic ground shaking. Ground shaking is a general term referring to all aspects of motion of the earth’s surface resulting from an earthquake and is normally the major cause of damage in seismic events. The extent of ground‐shaking is controlled by the magnitude and intensity of the earthquake, distance from the epicenter, and local geologic conditions. The magnitude of a seismic event is a measure of the energy released by an earthquake; it is assessed by seismographs that measure the amplitude of seismic waves. The intensity of an earthquake is a subjective measure of the perceptible effects of a seismic event at a given point. The Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) scale is the most commonly used scale to measure the subjective effects of earthquake intensity. It uses values ranging from I to XII.12 The closest faults to the project site are the Calaveras Fault, located approximately one mile to the west, and the Pleasanton Fault, located approximately 0.8 mile to the east. Mapping has been performed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) for the likely shaking intensities in the Bay Area that would have a 10 percent chance of occurring in any 50‐year period. A large earthquake (magnitude 6.7 or greater) on one of the major active faults in the region would generate violent (MMI 9) ground shaking at the project site.13 Title 7 of the Dublin Municipal Code includes the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), Part 2, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, a portion of the California Building Standards Code, as defined in the California State Health and Safety Code Section 18901, and the International Building Code. Chapter 7.28, Building Regulation Administration, authorizes the Building Official to administer those codes. Chapter 7.32 mandates the requirements for building safety and reducing earthquake‐ related hazards by requiring a geotechnical report for all new buildings or additions, unless waived by the Building Official. Chapter 7.16, Grading Regulations, states the requirements for managing erosion, grading, and excavation. Per the Dublin Municipal Code, a geotechnical investigation must be prepared and submitted when the proposed grading exceeds five feet in depth, when highly expansive soils are present, in areas of known or suspected geological hazards (e.g., landslide, ground failure), and when the Director of Public Works deems that a soil or geotechnical investigation is necessary. 11 California Department of Conservation. 2018. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (accessed September 1, 2020). 12 United States Geological Survey. 2018. The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. Website: www.usgs.gov/natural‐hazards/earthquake‐hazards/science/modified‐mercalli‐intensity‐scale?qt‐ science_center_objects=0#qt‐science_center_objects (accessed September 1, 2020). 13 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020a. Shaking Scenarios Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab29b35dfcd086fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐23 186 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not result in the exposure of people or new structures to the adverse effects associated with ground shaking; therefore, no impact would occur. Construction projects that would result in the development of new structures on the project site would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be required to comply with the recommendations of the soil or geotechnical investigation, the most current CBC, and the City of Dublin Building Code, which stipulates appropriate seismic design provisions that shall be implemented with project design and construction. iii. Seismic‐related ground failure, including liquefaction? (No Impact) Liquefaction is the transformation of saturated, loose, fine‐grained sediment to a fluid‐like state because of earthquake shaking or other rapid loading. Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose to medium dense, saturated sands, silty sands, sandy silts, non‐plastic silts and gravels with poor drainage, or those capped by or containing seams of impermeable sediment. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has mapped Seismic Hazard Zones that delineate areas susceptible to liquefaction and/or landslides that require proposed new developments in these areas to conduct additional investigation to determine the extent and magnitude of potential ground failure. According to mapping by CGS,14 the project site is located within a Seismic Hazard Zone for liquefaction. Mapping performed by ABAG indicates that the project site is in an area of moderate liquefaction susceptibility.15 As described in Response 3.7.a.ii, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not result in the exposure of people or new structures to the adverse effects associated with liquefaction; therefore, no impact would occur. Any future development of the project site would be required to comply with the recommendations of the soil or geotechnical investigation, the most current CBC, and the City of Dublin Building Code, which stipulates appropriate seismic design provisions that shall be implemented with project design and construction. iv. Landslides? (No Impact) According to CGS,16 the project site is not located within a Seismic Hazard Zone for landslide. The project site and surrounding vicinity is generally level. The project site is located within a developed 14 California Department of Conservation. 2018, op. cit. 15 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020b. Liquefaction Susceptibility Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab29b35dfcd086fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). 16 California Department of Conservation. 2018, op. cit. 3‐24 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 187 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 urban area and is not located within a rainfall‐induced landslide zone, according to ABAG.17 Therefore, future development that would be permitted under the proposed project is not likely to adversely impact persons or structures due to landslides and no impact would occur. b. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( No Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. The majority of the project site is covered by existing structures and surface pavements. Due to the absence of topsoil onsite, there would not be substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil as a result of future development of the project site and no impact would occur. c. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on‐ or off‐site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (No Impact) As discussed in Section 3.7.a, site soils would not be subject to lateral spreading or landslide but could be subject to liquefaction. Compliance with the recommendations contained in the geotechnical investigation and requirements of the CBC and City of Dublin Building Code would ensure that potential risks to people and structures as a result of liquefaction would be reduced to a less‐than‐significant level with implementation of future development projects. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in impacts associated with unstable geologic conditions. d. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18‐1‐B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? (No Impact) Expansion and contraction of volume can occur when expansive soils undergo alternating cycles of wetting (swelling) and drying (shrinking). During these cycles, the volume of the soil changes markedly. Changes in soil volume could result in significant expansion pressure on any structures proposed as part of future development of the project site. Expansive soils are common throughout California and can cause damage to foundations and slabs unless properly treated during construction. Soil types found on the project site include Sunnyvale clay loam over clay, according to the Natural Resources Conservation Service web soil survey.18 The shrink‐swell potential for this type of clay soil is high. As described in Response 3.7.a.ii, no physical improvements to the site would occur with implementation of the proposed project; therefore, no impact would occur. Any future development of the project site would be required to comply with the recommendations of a soil or geotechnical investigation, the most current CBC, and the City of Dublin Building Code. Adherence to these requirements would ensure that geotechnical design of any future development 17 Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020c. Interactive Landslide Hazards Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab29b35dfcd086fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). 18 United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. 2019. Web Soil Survey. Available online at: websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm (accessed September 1, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐25 188 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 project at the site would reduce potential impacts related to expansive soils to a less‐than‐ significant level. e. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (No Impact) The project site is located in an urban area served by wastewater collection infrastructure. Implementation of the proposed GPA and Rezoning and future development of the project site would not result in the need for new septic systems within areas known to have unstable soils and no impact would occur. f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (No Impact) The majority of the project site is paved and disturbed land that is not known to contain paleontological resources. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site and would not include any ground disturbance; therefore, no impact would occur. Future development projects that could result in ground disturbance such as grading and excavation within paleontologically sensitive areas would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process. Projects determined to potentially affect paleontologically sensitive areas may either be denied or subject to the further environmental review and evaluation, including mitigation and/or implementation of the City’s standard conditions of approval to reduce environmental impacts. 3‐26 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 189 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? a. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Greenhouse gases (GHGs) are present in the atmosphere naturally, are released by natural sources, or are formed from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. The gases that are widely seen as the principal contributors to human‐induced global climate change are: Carbon dioxide (CO2); Methane (CH4); Nitrous oxide (N2O); Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs); Perfluorocarbons (PFCs); and Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6). Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, believed to be causing global warming. While manmade GHGs include naturally occurring GHGs such as CO2, methane, and N2O, some gases, like HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 are completely new to the atmosphere. Certain gases, such as water vapor, are short‐lived in the atmosphere. Others remain in the atmos‐ phere for significant periods, contributing to climate change in the long term. Water vapor is excluded from the list of GHGs above because it is short‐lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation. These gases vary considerably in terms of Global Warming Potential (GWP), a concept developed to compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The GWP is based on several factors, including the relative effectiveness of a gas to absorb infrared radiation and length of time that the gas remains in the atmosphere (“atmospheric lifetime”). The GWP of P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐27 190 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 each gas is measured relative to CO2, the most abundant GHG. The definition of GWP for a particular GHG is the ratio of heat trapped by one‐unit mass of the GHG to the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of CO2 over a specified time period. GHG emissions are typically measured in terms of pounds or tons of “CO2 equivalents” (CO2e). This section describes the proposed project’s construction‐ and operational‐related GHG emissions and contribution to global climate change. Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access); therefore, no impact would occur. Any future construction projects on the site would be reviewed on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval and existing government regulations, including BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures. Implementation of these measures would reduce GHG emissions by reducing the amount of construction vehicle idling and by requiring the use of properly maintained equipment. Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Long‐term GHG emissions are typically generated from mobile sources (e.g., cars, trucks and buses), area sources (e.g., maintenance activities and landscaping), indirect emissions from sources associated with energy consumption, waste sources (land filling and waste disposal), and water sources (water supply and conveyance, treatment, and distribution). Mobile‐source GHG emissions would include project‐generated vehicle trips to and from the project site. Area‐source emissions would be associated with activities such as landscaping and maintenance on the project site. Energy source emissions would be generated at off‐site utility providers as a result of increased electricity demand generated by the project. Waste source emissions generated by the proposed project include energy generated by land filling and other methods of disposal related to transporting and managing project generated waste. In addition, water source emissions associated with the proposed project are generated by water supply and conveyance, water treatment, water distribution, and wastewater treatment. The proposed project includes a GPA to change the land use designation for the site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive and a Rezoning of the site from M‐1 to C‐2. The project site is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No new construction is proposed to replace the existing building. Under current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum of a 26,448‐square‐foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed General Plan and Zoning regulations would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet with up to 150 employees. This is an increase of approximately 6,600 square feet and approximately 77 employees compared to what is currently allowed on the site and approximately 16,900 square feet greater than what currently exists on the site. 3‐28 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 191 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 As discussed above, BAAQMD has developed screening criteria to provide lead agencies with a conservative indication of whether the proposed project would result in potentially significant air quality impacts. If all of the screening criteria were met by a proposed project, then the lead agency would not need to perform a detailed air quality assessment of the proposed project’s emissions. These screening levels are generally representative of new development without any form of mitigation measures taken into consideration. In addition, the screening criteria do not account for project design features, attributes, or local development requirements that could also result in lower emissions. For regional shopping center land uses, BAAQMD’s screening size for GHG emissions is 19,000 square feet and for high turnover restaurant land uses (the most intensive use that could be developed under the proposed GPA and Rezoning), BAAQMD’s screening size is 7,000 square feet. Since the proposed project would allow for a maximum of 33,061 square feet, based on BAAQMD’s screening criteria, the potential increase in intensity of use on the site could exceed the screening criteria. Future projects that would be above this threshold would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the permit process for new construction and may require subsequent analysis to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, the City of Dublin Climate Action Plan 2030 and Beyond (CAP 2030) establishes a vision for the City to reach carbon neutrality by 2045 and includes quantified actions the City will take to reduce GHG emissions by 65,090 metric tons CO2e by 2030. The CAP 2030 identifies additional actions that will need to be implemented to reach carbon neutrality. Dublin adopted its first Climate Action Plan (CAP 2020) in 2010 and is on track to meet the 2020 GHG emissions target. The purpose of the CAP 2030 is to meet the State’s 2030 GHG emissions reductions target of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. The CAP 2030 identifies GHG reduction strategies and measures that relate to renewable and carbon‐free energy, building efficiency and electrification, sustainable mobility and land use, materials and waste management, and municipal leadership. Future development would be required to show consistency with the City’s CAP and would be constructed using energy efficient modern building materials and construction practices, in accordance with CALGreen, California Public Utility Commission Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, and City standards. New buildings also would use new modern appliances and equipment. Under these requirements, future development would use environmentally sustainable building materials, building designs that reduce the amount of energy used in building heating and cooling systems as compared to conventionally built structures, and landscaping that incorporates water efficient irrigation systems, all of which would conserve energy. The project would be subject to all applicable permit and planning requirements in place or adopted by the City of Dublin. Therefore, the proposed project would not be a significant source of operational GHG emissions. Operation of the proposed project would not generate significant GHG emissions that would have a significant effect on the environment and impacts would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐29 192 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 b. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) As discussed above, the proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). In addition, future development would be constructed using energy efficient modern building materials and construction practices, in accordance with CALGreen, CPUC Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, and City standards. New buildings also would use new modern appliances and equipment. Under these requirements, future development would use environmentally sustainable building materials, building designs that reduce the amount of energy used in building heating and cooling systems as compared to conventionally built structures, and landscaping that incorporates water efficient irrigation systems, all of which would conserve energy. The project would be subject to all applicable permit and planning requirements in place or adopted by the City of Dublin. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. This impact would be less than significant. 3‐30 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 193 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one‐ quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g. Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? a. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. These types of land uses would not involve transport, use, or disposal of significant quantities of hazardous materials. Small quantities of hazardous materials, such as paints, oil, and cleaning chemicals, may be used. Any future owner/operator of such facilities at the project site would be required to comply with existing government regulations in the use and disposal of any hazardous materials. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Construction activities associated with potential future development of the project site could include removal of the existing building and pavements, and construction of a new building(s). During construction, hazardous materials such as vehicle fuels and lubricants and building materials such as asphalt, paints, and adhesives would be used. While these are commonly used materials, if handled improperly, they could endanger workers or the public. Locally, the use, storage, and management of hazardous materials are regulated by the Hazardous Materials Division, which is part of the Alameda P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐31 194 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 County Department of Environmental Health (ACDEH). ACDEH is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for all areas of Alameda County. The Hazardous Materials Division provides comprehensive environmental regulatory compliance inspection services to protect human health and the environment. Additionally, program personnel perform plan reviews and inspections associated with the construction, upgrading, and closure of hazardous materials storage facilities and equipment. Compliance with federal, State, and Alameda County hazardous materials laws and regulations would minimize any potential risks to the public from construction‐related hazardous materials. b. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) There are two main ways that the public and/or the environment could be affected by the release of hazardous materials from the project site, including: (1) exposing workers and/or the public to potentially contaminated soil and groundwater during construction and/or operation of the project; or (2) exposing workers and/or the public to hazardous building materials (e.g., lead paint, asbestos) during demolition of existing structures. However, implementation of the project would not result demolition activities or any other physical improvements to the project site. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow for the potential future development of the project site with general commercial, retail, and service uses, as well as automobile/vehicle sales and service, automobile/vehicle repairs and service, eating and drinking establishments, shopping centers, professional/administrative offices, hotels and motels, and services stations. As described above, small quantities of common hazardous materials would be used at the project site during construction and operation of potential future uses at the project site. Improper use, storage, or handling could result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment, which could pose a risk to construction workers and the public. However, any future project applicant would be required to comply with existing government regulations in its use and disposal of these materials, and such materials would not be used in sufficient strength or quantity to create a substantial risk to human or environmental health. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less‐than‐significant impact related to the release of hazardous materials into the environmental during both the construction and operational periods. c. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one‐quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Less‐ Than‐Significant Impact) No public schools are located within 0.25 mile of the project site. The nearest schools to the project site are Valley High School, located approximately 0.4‐mile northwest, and Wells Middle School, located approximately 0.5‐mile north of the project site. As noted in Section 3.9.a, development of the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. As noted in Section 3.9.b, construction activities would not create a hazard to the public and environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions, and this impact would be less than significant. 3‐32 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 195 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 d. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Government Code Section 65962.5 states that the California Department of Toxic Substances shall compile and maintain annually a list of hazardous waste facilities subject to corrective action as part of the Health and Safety Code. This list is commonly referred to as the Cortese List. The project site is not located on the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Leaking Underground Tank Cleanup Site (LUST) or any other Cleanup Program Sites (formerly known as spills, leaks, investigations, and cleanups or SLIC). These two components comprise the State Cortese List of known hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. According to the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker website,19 two State‐listed hazardous materials clean‐up sites are located within 1,000 feet of the project site. One site, the City of Dublin Civic Center, located south of the project site at 100 Civic Plaza, is listed as a LUST site. This site is designated “closed.” A closed site indicates that regulatory requirements for response actions, such as site assessment and remediation, have either been completed or were not necessary and, therefore, potential migration of residual contaminants in groundwater beneath the project corridor (if any) does not likely pose a risk to human health and the environment. One other site, the former Chevron Records Facility, is located northwest of the project site at 6400 Sierra Court. This site is listed as “Open – Remediation as of 12/05/14” due to the presence of trichloroethylene (TCE). However, due to the direction of groundwater flow (northwest) away from the project site,20 potential migration of residual contaminants in groundwater beneath the project site would not likely pose a risk to human health and the environment. Therefore, no significant hazard to the public or environment would be associated with this listed site, and this impact would be less than significant. e. Would the project be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? (No Impact) The project site is located approximately five miles west of the Livermore Municipal Airport. The project area is not located within the Airport Safety Zones or Airport Influence Area of the Livermore Municipal Airport.21 The proposed GPA and Rezoning would not result in new construction within the vicinity of an airport. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard for 19 State Water Resources Control Board. 2020. Geotracker Website Application. Available online at: geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=6207+Sierra+Court%2C+Dublin%2C+C A (accessed September 1, 2020). 20 SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC. 2013. Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan, 6400 Sierra Court, Dublin, California. July 1. Available online at: documents.geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8705445766/SL0600196603.PDF (accessed September 1, 2020). 21 Alameda County Community Development Agency. 2012. Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. August. Available online at: www.acgov.org/cda/planning/generalplans/airportlandplans.htm (accessed September 1, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐33 196 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 people residing or working in the area, or for people assembling at the project site due to the proximity of an airport. No impact would occur. f. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The Tri‐Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan22 was developed in compliance with State requirements and also meets the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as the City’s local hazard mitigation plan. The Tri‐Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan provides a uniform hazard mitigation strategy for the Tri‐Valley area, addressing a range of hazards including, but not limited to, earthquakes, floods and wildland fire. The City of Dublin also has an adopted Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to assess hazards and mitigate risks prior to a disaster event. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. Because the proposed project would not alter or block adjacent roadways, implementation of the proposed project would not be expected to impair the function of nearby emergency evacuation routes. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less‐than‐significant impact on implementation of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. g. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The project site is located within a developed urban area and according to the California Department of Fire and Forestry Protection (CalFire), the project site is not located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.23 Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant loss, injury or death involving wildland fires and this impact would be less than significant. 22 TetraTech. 2018. Tri‐Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. September. Available online at: dublin.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/20467/2018‐09‐04_HMP‐Volume‐1‐_Tri‐Valley_FINAL (accessed September 1, 2020). 23 CalFire. 2008. Alameda County Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Available online at: osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6638/fhszl_map1.pdf (accessed September 1, 2020). 3‐34 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 197 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site; ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on‐ or offsite; iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? a. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. No physical improvements to the project site would result with implementation of the proposed project; therefore, impacts related to water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, and surface water quality would not occur. Future construction projects that would result in the development of new structures or alteration of existing drainage conditions would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be required to comply with the most current regulatory requirements, as described further below. The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards regulate water quality of surface water and groundwater bodies throughout California. In the Bay Area, including the project site, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) is responsible for implementation the Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). The Basin Plan establishes beneficial water uses for waterways and water bodies within the region. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐35 198 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Runoff water quality is regulated by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program (established through the federal Clean Water Act). The NPDES program objective is to control and reduce pollutant discharges to surface water bodies. Compliance with NPDES permits is mandated by State and federal statutes and regulations. Locally, the NPDES Program is administered by the Water Board. According to the water quality control plans of the Water Board, any construction activities, including grading, that would result in the disturbance of one acre or more would require compliance with the General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activity (Construction General Permit). The project site is approximately 1.5 acres and, as such, any future development project at the site would be required to comply with the Construction General Permit. Physical improvements to the project site would be subject to the Water Board’s Municipal Regional Permit (MRP), implemented in November 2015 by Order R2‐2015‐0049. Provision C.3 of the MRP requires new development and development projects that would replace more than 10,000 square feet of existing impervious surfaces24 to include post‐construction stormwater control in project designs. In addition, projects that disturb more than one acre of land may also be subject to the hydromodification25 management requirements of the MRP. Under the C.3 requirements, the preparation and submittal of a Stormwater Control Plan (SCP) would be required for the project site. The purpose of an SCP is to detail the design elements and implementation measures necessary to meet the post‐construction stormwater control requirements of the MRP. In particular, SCPs must include Low Impact Development (LID) design measures, which reduce water quality impacts by preserving and recreating natural landscape features, minimizing imperviousness, and using stormwater as a resource, rather than a waste product. Proposed projects would also be required to prepare a Stormwater Facility Operation and Maintenance Plan to ensure that stormwater control measures are inspected, maintained, and funded for the life of the project. Compliance with these regulatory requirements would ensure that potential construction‐ and operation‐period impacts to water quality associated with any future development project at the site would be less than significant. b. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (No Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. This change in the allowed uses at the project site would not result in the depletion of groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. The majority of the project site consists of impervious surfaces comprised of an existing building and a surface parking lot. Any 24 Under Provision C.3 of the MRP, gas station, restaurant, automotive facilities, or parking lots that create or replace 5,000 square feet of impervious surfaces must implement post‐construction stormwater controls. 25 Hydromodification is defined as the modification of a stream’s hydrograph, caused in general by increases in flows and durations that result when land is developed (e.g., made more impervious). The effects of hydromodification include, but are not limited to, increased bed and bank erosion, loss of habitat, increased sediment transport and deposition, and increased flooding. 3‐36 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 199 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 future development at the project site would likely not have the potential to interfere with groundwater recharge, as minimal pervious surfaces currently exist at the site. Future construction projects that would result in the development of new structures or potentially interfere with groundwater recharge would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be required to comply with the most current regulatory requirements. Furthermore, the project site is located in an urban area where the majority of stormwater runoff drains to storm drainpipes rather than infiltrating into the groundwater aquifer. Consequently, the project site is not located in an area that substantially contributes to the recharge of the underlying groundwater aquifer. Therefore, the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge and potential impacts related to the depletion of groundwater supplies would not occur. c. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site; ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on‐ or off‐site; iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv. Impede or redirect flood flows? (No Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. This change in the allowed uses at the project site would not alter the course of a stream or river. The project site is located in a developed area and implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage patterns in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on‐ or off‐site, result in on‐ or off‐site flooding, or redirect or impede floods flows and no impact would occur. Future construction projects that would result in the development of new structures or alteration of existing drainage conditions would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s permit process and would be required to comply with the most current regulatory requirements. d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? (No Impact) The project site is not located within a 100‐year flood hazard zone as mapped by FEMA and is not located within a mapped dam failure inundation area.26 There are no levees protecting the site from flooding and as a result, no risk of failure. The project site and surrounding areas are generally level and would not be subject to mudflows. 26 Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2020. FEMA Flood Map Service Center (map). Website: msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=6207%20Sierra%20Court%2C%20Dublin%2C%20CA%20#sear chresultsanchor (accessed September 10, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐37 200 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 The project site is not located within a mapped tsunami area27 and no seismically induced seiche waves have been documented in the San Francisco Bay throughout history.28 Therefore, no impact would occur. e. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? (No Impact) As discussed above, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. This change in land uses would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Construction and operation of any future development project at the site would be subject to State and regional requirements related to stormwater runoff. Required compliance with State and local regulations regarding stormwater during construction and operation would ensure that the proposed project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. As a result, no impact would occur. 27 California, State of. 2019. California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps. Website: www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps (accessed September 10, 2020). 28 Association of Bay Area Governments and Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 2013. Plan Bay Area. July 18. 3‐38 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 201 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? a. Would the project physically divide an established community? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The physical division of an established community typically refers to the construction of a physical feature (such as an interstate highway or railroad tracks) or removal of a means of access (such as a local road or bridge) that would impair mobility within an existing community, or between a community and an outlying area. For instance, the construction of an interstate highway through an existing community may constrain travel from one side of the community to another; similarly, such construction may also impair travel to areas outside of the community. The project site consists of an existing building within a developed area surrounded by industrial and commercial uses. The proposed project would result in a change in the permitted uses allowed at the site, including retail, office, and automotive uses and the potential development of the project site, which could include automobile/vehicle sales and service, automobile/vehicle repairs and service, as well as eating and drinking establishments, shopping centers, professional/administrative offices, hotels and motels, and services stations. The proposed project would not result in the construction of any new infrastructure that would divide an established community and would not remove any means of access. The proposed project would not result in a physical division of an established community or adversely affect the continuity of land uses in the vicinity and no impact would occur. b. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) It should be noted that according to CEQA, policy conflicts do not, in and of themselves, constitute a significant environmental impact. Policy conflicts are considered to be environmental impacts only when they would result in direct physical impacts or where those conflicts relate to avoiding or mitigating environmental impacts. As such, associated physical environmental impacts are discussed in this Initial Study under specific topical sections (e.g., cultural resources, hazardous materials, noise, etc.). The proposed project would not result in any direct physical changes and impacts would be less than significant. The project site is currently designated as Business Park/Industrial on the City’s General Plan Land Use Map and is within the M‐1 zoning district on the City’s Zoning Map. The project proposes to re‐ designate and rezone the project site to Retail/Office and Automotive and C‐2, respectively. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐39 202 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 General Plan. As described in Chapter 2.0, Project Description, the project site is designated Business Park/Industrial in the City’s General Plan. According to the City’s General Plan, the Business Park/Industrial designation allows for non‐retail businesses (e.g., research, limited manufacturing and distribution activities, and administrative offices) that do not involve heavy trucking or generate nuisances due to emissions, noise or open uses. Permitted FAR29 ranges from 0.30 to 0.40 and the allowable employee density is 360 to 490 square feet per employee. The proposed project would allow re‐designation of the project site to Retail/Office and Automotive, which supports general commercial, retail and service uses, as well as automobile/vehicle sales and service, and similar auto focused uses. Uses also include eating and drinking establishments, shopping centers, business and professional offices, hotels and motels, and services stations. The Retail/Office and Automotive designation permits development at intensities of up to 0.5 FAR and employee density up to 220 to 490 square feet per employee. As outlined in the project description, implementation of the proposed project would amend the City’s General Plan and the General Plan Map to reflect the change in land use changes over time in the vicinity of the project site and create consistency between the project site and neighboring properties to the east. Zoning Ordinance. The project site is located within the M‐1 zoning district, which is intended to provide for the continued use, expansion and new development of light industrial use types in proximity to major transportation corridors and to ensure compatibility with adjacent residential and commercial uses. Permitted uses in the M‐1 zoning district include ambulance service, commercial kitchen, laboratory, light industrial, mini‐storage, office – contractor’s, office – professional/administrative, outdoor seating, parking lot/garage, printing and publishing, recording studio, research and development, storage of petroleum products for on‐site use, trucking terminal, and warehousing and distribution. As part of the proposed project, the site would also be rezoned from M‐1 to C‐2 consistent with the amended General Plan land use designation. As outlined in the project description, the proposed Rezoning would reflect the change in land uses over time in the vicinity of the project site and create consistency between the project site and neighboring properties to the east. The proposed Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses within the project site. Such uses would be harmonious and compatible with existing and potential development in surrounding areas, which consist of industrial uses to the north; public/semi‐public uses to the south, including the Dublin Civic Center and Dublin Sports Ground; and retail, office, automotive uses to the east and west. The project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot one‐story building that includes an existing commercial use. No new building is currently proposed to replace the existing building. Under current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum of a 26,448‐square‐foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed GPA and 29 The term floor area ratio refers to the gross floor area permitted on a site divided by the total net area of the site. The gross floor area includes the total floor area of each floor and of all buildings on a site, including internal circulation (halls, lobbies, stairways, elevator shafts, enclosed porches, and balconies, etc.), storage and equipment space, as measured from the outside faces of the exterior walls. 3‐40 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 203 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Rezoning would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet of building area with up to 150 employees. This is an increase of approximately 6,600 square feet and approximately 77 employees compared to what is currently allowed on the site. The project site consists of an approximately 1.5‐ acre (66,122‐square‐foot) property, surrounding by similar urban development. The project site is physically suitable for the increase in intensity associated with the change in zoning from M‐1 to C‐2. As described throughout this Initial Study, proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow general commercial, retail, and service uses, as well as auto‐focused uses in an already developed area. No new construction is currently proposed at the project site. Future development at the project site would be evaluated as part of the City’s review process and would be subject to further environmental review and/or discretionary actions, depending on the nature of the proposed project. Future projects would be subject to the City’s standard conditions of approval for all development projects and could be subject to additional conditions and/or mitigation measures (in the event that further environmental review is required) to ensure that any future development would not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, proposed project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. This impact would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐41 204 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally‐important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? a. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (No Impact) Neither the State Geologist nor the California Department of Mines and Geology (CDMG) have classified any areas in the City as containing mineral deposits that are either of Statewide significance or the significance of which requires further evaluation. 30 The project site has been classified by the CDMG as being located in MRZ‐1, indicating that the project site is located in an area where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence.31 In addition, the project site is not designated or zoned for the extraction of mineral deposits. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value of the region and the residents of the state and no impact would occur. b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally‐important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (No Impact) As stated in Response 3.12.a., the project site is classified as MRZ‐1, indicating the site is located where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. The project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No mineral extraction activities occur on the project site, and it is not located within an area known to contain locally important mineral resources. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan and no impact would occur. 30 State of California, Division of Mines and Geology. 1996. Generalized Mineral Land Classification Map of the South San Francisco Bay Production Consumption Region. Open File Report 96‐03, Plate 1. 31 Ibid. 3‐42 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 205 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.13 NOISE Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project result in: a. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? a. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Less‐Than‐ Significant Impact) Noise is usually defined as unwanted sound. Noise consists of any sound that may produce physiological or psychological damage and/or interfere with communication, work, rest, recreation, or sleep. Several noise measurement scales exist that are used to describe noise in a particular location. A decibel (dB) is a unit of measurement that indicates the relative intensity of a sound. Sound levels in dB are calculated on a logarithmic basis. An increase of 10 dB represents a 10‐fold increase in acoustic energy, while 20 dB is 100 times more intense and 30 dB is 1,000 times more intense. Each 10 dB increase in sound level is perceived as approximately a doubling of loudness; and similarly, each 10 dB decrease in sound level is perceived as half as loud. Sound intensity is normally measured through the A‐weighted sound level (dBA). This scale gives greater weight to the frequencies of sound to which the human ear is most sensitive. The A‐weighted sound level is the basis for 24‐hour sound measurements that better represent human sensitivity to sound at night. As noise spreads from a source, it loses energy so that the farther away the noise receiver is from the noise source, the lower the perceived noise level would be. Geometric spreading causes the sound level to attenuate or be reduced, resulting in a 6 dB reduction in the noise level for each doubling of distance from a single point source of noise to the noise sensitive receptor of concern. A project would have a significant noise effect if it would substantially increase the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of applicable regulatory agencies, including, as appropriate, the City of Dublin. Short‐Term (Construction) Noise Impacts. Implementation of the proposed GPA and Rezoning would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). Future projects that would result in the development of new structures P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐43 206 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s development review process and would be required to comply with the Dublin Municipal Code ordinances establishing permissible hours of noise‐producing construction activity, which would ensure that short‐term construction noise impacts would be less than significant. Operational Noise Impacts. According to the City’s General Plan, traffic is the major source of noise in Dublin. Much of the project site, along with the area adjacent to the project site, is exposed to noise levels between 65 and 70 dB CNEL as shown in Figure 9‐1 of the City’s General Plan. A characteristic of sound is that a doubling of a noise source is required in order to result in a perceptible (3 dBA or greater) increase in the resulting noise level. The project site itself is located in an urban area adjacent to roadways that are heavily traveled. Noise from the proposed project would be similar to existing conditions and would generally include noise from vehicles, air conditioner units, and other similar equipment. Due to its location at a heavily used arterial and its existing noise contours, it is not expected that more intensive uses that could occupy the existing building would result in a perceptible increase in noise to surrounding land uses. In addition, as discussed above, the proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access). Any future cconstruction of a new building would require discretionary review by the City and the land use proposed at that time would be subject to review. Therefore, the project would have a less‐than‐significant impact related to generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in a local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. b. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Vibration refers to groundborne noise and perceptible motion. Groundborne vibration is almost exclusively a concern inside buildings and is rarely perceived as a problem outdoors. Vibration energy propagates from a source, through intervening soil and rock layers, to the foundations of nearby buildings. The vibration then propagates from the foundation throughout the remainder of the structure. Building vibration may be perceived by the occupants as the motion of building surfaces, rattling of items on shelves or hanging on walls, or as a low‐frequency rumbling noise. The rumbling noise is caused by the vibrating walls, floors, and ceilings radiating sound waves. Annoyance from vibration often occurs when the vibration exceeds the threshold of perception by 10 dB or less. This is an order of magnitude below the damage threshold for normal buildings. As the proposed project would not result in any physical changes to the existing site (e.g., demolition, construction, modification of site access), potential structural damage from heavy construction activities would not occur. The streets surrounding the project area are paved, smooth, and unlikely to cause significant groundborne vibration. In addition, the rubber tires and suspension systems of buses and other on‐ road vehicles make it unusual for on‐road vehicles to cause groundborne noise or vibration problems. Therefore, no such vehicular vibration impacts would occur and no vibration impact analysis of on‐road vehicles is necessary. The potential change in use or increase in the intensity of 3‐44 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 207 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 use at the project site, which could result from the proposed project, would not generate groundborne vibration. This impact would be less than significant. c. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Less‐ Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed project is not located within two miles of a private airstrip, public airport, or a public use airport and is not within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport, Livermore Municipal Airport, is located approximately five miles east of the project site. Although aircraft‐related noise is occasionally audible at the project site, the site does not lie within the 55 dBA CNEL noise contours of any public airports or private airfields. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels due to the proximity of a public airport. This impact would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐45 208 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) With implementation of the proposed GPA and Rezoning, the maximum allowable development on the site could include a 33,061‐square foot, one‐story building, which would generate approximately 150 employees at the maximum employment density (approximately 16,944 square feet greater than what currently exists and 6,613 square feet greater than what is currently allowed on the site). At the maximum employee density, the proposed project could increase employment at the site by approximately 104 employees over the existing condition and by approximately 77 employees compared to what is currently allowed on the site under the existing zoning designation. The proposed project does not include housing and the site is located in a developed urban area. Although the proposed project could increase the intensity of use at the site and generate additional employees, the number of additional employees would not be substantial. According to the City’s General Plan, the Primary Planning Area, within which the project site is located, had an estimated 12,163 jobs in 2012. Based on the employee density regulations outlined in the City’s General Plan, the City anticipated potential development of 2,735 to 4,972 jobs in areas designated as Business Park/Industrial and 898 to 4,045 jobs designated as Retail/Office and Automotive, with total jobs Citywide between 6,478 and 21,017. 32 The potential employment growth associated with future development of the project site would be consistent with and within the scope of the planned employment growth assumed in the City’s General Plan. Because it was anticipated that uses within the Retail/Office and Automotive land use designation would provide employment, the proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the area, and this impact would be less than significant. 32 Dublin, City of. 2017. City of Dublin General Plan. November 21. Available online at: www.dublin.ca.gov/171/General‐Plan#Chapter%201 (accessed December 16, 2020). 3‐46 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 209 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 b. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (No Impact) As described above, the project site is currently developed with an existing 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes various an existing commercial use No residential units currently exist at the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in the displacement of people or housing necessitating replacement housing elsewhere in the City, and no impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐47 210 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ii. Police protection? iii. Schools? iv. Parks? v. Other public facilities? a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i. Fire protection? ii. Police protection? iii. Schools? iv. Parks? v. Other public facilities? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Fire suppression, emergency medical and rescue services, and other life safety services are provided to the project area and site by the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD). There are three fire stations in Dublin, with the closest to the project site being Fire Station No. 16 at 7494 Donohue Drive, approximately one‐mile northwest. The Alameda County Sherriff’s Office provides contracted police protection to the project area and project site. The Dublin Police Services headquarters are located at 6361 Clark Avenue, southwest of the project site. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses and this change in the allowed uses within the project site would not increase the demand for fire or police services. Existing service providers would continue to serve the project site within the City with the existing staffing and facilities. The proposed project would not increase the demand for fire or police services, such that new or physically altered facilities would be required. 3‐48 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 211 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 In addition, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would not induce population growth (see Section 3.14.a) and would not generate new students, park users, or users of other government facilities, such as libraries, community centers or public health care facilities. The proposed project would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. These uses would not individually increase the demand for school, park, or other facilities such that new or physically altered facilities would be required to serve the new demand and this impact would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐49 212 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.16 RECREATION Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (No Impact) As discussed in Section 3.14, Population and Housing, and Section 3.15, Public Services, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would not induce population growth or otherwise increase the use of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in impacts related to the use of the existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. No impact would occur. b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (No Impact) The project does not include nor require the construction or expansion of new or existing public recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not result additional environmental effects associated with recreation beyond those described in this document. 3‐50 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 213 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.17 TRANSPORTATION Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)? c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d. Result in inadequate emergency access? a. Would the project conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would change the land use designation of the project site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive in the General Plan and from M‐1 to C‐2 zoning district. The project site is currently developed with a 16,117‐square‐foot building that includes an existing commercial use. No new building is currently proposed to replace the existing building. Under current General Plan and Zoning regulations, the project site could be developed with a maximum of a 26,448‐square foot building and up to 73 employees. The proposed General Plan and Zoning regulations would permit a maximum of 33,061 square feet with up to 150 employees. This is an increase of 6,613 square feet and 77 employees. The City of Dublin General Plan Circulation and Scenic Highways Element establishes vehicle level of service targets for intersections and roadway segments within the City. Vehicle level of service can be affected by the vehicle trips generated by land developments. Because no building is currently proposed to replace the existing building, no immediate change in the trip generation potential would result from the proposed GPA and Rezoning. However, the future trip generation potential of the project site could be affected. Table C calculates the potential effect on trip generation resulting from the proposed GPA and Rezoning. Trip rates are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Business Park category for the existing land use and the Shopping Center category for future land uses that could be allowed within the existing building or with future redevelopment of the site. As Table C shows, changing the General Plan land use designation and zoning for the project site could result in approximately 54 more trips during the PM peak commute hour if a more intense land use occupies the current building. The maximum development potential of the project site would be increased by approximately 115 vehicle trips during the PM peak commute hour. However, retail/commercial or restaurant uses (the most intensive use that could be developed under the proposed GPA and Rezoning) attract many of their trips from traffic already on the P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐51 214 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 adjacent roadway. The percentage of these pass‐by trips is predictable based on the type of use and application of the appropriate pass‐by rate could reduce the net new trip generation below 100 peak hour trips. The Alameda County Transportation Commission Congestion Management Program (September 2019) establishes a 100 PM peak hour trip threshold of review of land use actions. A screening threshold of 100 peak hour trips is commonly used to determine whether a land use project has the potential to affect vehicle level of service and a detailed traffic analysis may be required. Because the proposed change in land use designation would result in fewer than 100 additional peak hour trips within the existing building, the change in land use designation is less likely to affect vehicle level of service. However, demolition of the existing building and construction of a new building could result in more than 100 net new peak hour trips depending on the type of use proposed. Construction of a new building would require discretionary review by the City and the land use proposed at that time would be subject to review and measurement against the 100 net new peak hour trip threshold. If, as part of the subsequent discretionary review, a specific proposed land use is found to have the potential to affect vehicle level of service based on the City’s review standards, specific measures such as implementation of a travel demand management plan could be implemented to preserve vehicle level of service. Table C: Potential Change in Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Unit ADT In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates1 Business Park (770) TSF 12.44 0.24 0.16 0.40 0.19 0.23 0.42 Shopping Center (820) TSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 Existing Building Trip Generation Potential Existing Business Park (770) 16.117 TSF 200 4 3 7 3 4 7 Proposed Shopping Center (820) 16.117 TSF 608 9 6 15 29 32 61 New Trip Generation Potential 408 5 3 8 26 28 54 Maximum Development Trip Generation Potential Existing Business Park (770) 26.448 TSF 329 6 5 11 5 6 11 Proposed Shopping Center (820) 33.061 TSF 1,248 19 12 31 61 65 126 New Trip Generation Potential 919 13 8 20 56 59 115 1 Trip rates referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). ADT = average daily traffic TSF = thousand square feet The proposed project would not modify the public right‐of‐way including pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities. The project would not affect pedestrian, bicycle, or transit facilities, the project is not likely to affect vehicle level of service standards established for roadways in the vicinity of the 3‐52 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 215 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 existing building, and any future new development project would be evaluated and modified to prevent affecting vehicle level of service standards established by the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system. This impact would be less than significant. b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Effective December 28, 2018, the CEQA Guidelines were updated and require the evaluation of vehicle miles transportation (VMT) as the criteria for analyzing transportation impacts for land use projects. As noted in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(c), the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 shall apply prospectively as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15007. A lead agency could have elected to be governed by the provisions of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 immediately; however, beginning on July 1, 2020, the provisions of this section was stated to apply Statewide. The City of Dublin, as lead agency, has not yet adopted specific thresholds related to VMT metrics. However, simultaneous with clearance of the revised State CEQA Guidelines, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released the Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts under CEQA (OPR, December 2018). This State document provides sufficient guidance to permit the evaluation of project transportation impacts for the purposes of compliance with CEQA. The Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts under CEQA suggests that adding local serving retail development tends to shorten trips and reduce VMT. It continues to suggest that retail development less than 50,000 square feet be considered to have a less than significant impact on VMT. The new land uses possible for the project site with the change in land use designation would be local serving and would be less than 50,000 square feet. Therefore, the proposed project would neither conflict with nor be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, and the impact would be less than significant. c. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (No Impact) As shown in Section 1.0, similar land uses to the proposed land use designation currently exist adjacent to the project site. Vehicles accessing the project site would not be substantially different from or incompatible with vehicles accessing adjacent parcels. The project would not alter access or geometric design features. Therefore, the project would result in no impact. d. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed project would not result in the alteration of any access points. Any future development would be subject to City review and approval of site plans including emergency access. As shown in Table C, new vehicle traffic generated by the change in land use designation would be less than 100 trips in either peak commute hour, which is not likely to affect vehicle level of service. Therefore, the potential impact to emergency access would be less than significant. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐53 216 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. a. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? Or ii. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (No Impact) Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), which became law on January 1, 2015, provides for consultation with California Native American tribes during the CEQA environmental review process, and equates significant impacts to “tribal cultural resources” with significant environmental impacts. The consultation provisions of the law require that a public agency consult with local Native American tribes that have requested placement on that agency’s notification list for CEQA projects. Within 14 days of determining that a project application is complete, or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency must notify tribes of the opportunity to consult on the project, should a tribe have previously requested to be on the agency’s notification list. 3‐54 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 217 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 California Native American tribes must be recognized by the NAHC as traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project site and must have previously requested that the lead agency notify them of projects. Tribes have 30 days following notification of a project to request consultation with the lead agency. The purpose of consultation is to inform the lead agency in its identification and determination of the significance of tribal cultural resources. If a project is determined to result in a significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource, the consultation process must occur and conclude prior to adoption of a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, or certification of an Environmental Impact Report (PRC Sections 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3). No California Native American tribe formally requested consultation notifications with the City during the required 30‐day notification period, consistent with the requirements of PRC 21080.3.1. As such, tribal consultation for the proposed project was not required for this project. As discussed in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the proposed project would not result in any physical improvements to the project site; therefore, no impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐55 218 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? a. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The project site is located in an area currently served by existing utilities. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. This change in the allowed uses would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded facilities because such uses are not likely to generate substantial increases in demand as compared to the existing, currently allowable uses. Construction projects that would result in the development of new structures on the project site would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s development review process and would be required to comply with the most current requirements for the installation of new utility infrastructure. Proposed uses would also be required to comply with existing building occupancy limits and so would not be expected to substantially increase the use of or demand for existing services and infrastructure. Therefore, the relocation or reconstruction of new or expanded water, recycled water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, electric power, gas, or telecommunications facilities would not be required, and this impact would be less than significant. 3‐56 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 219 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 b. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? (Less‐Than‐ Significant Impact) Refer to Response 3.19.a. The project site is located in an area currently served by existing utilities. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. These uses are not likely to generate substantial increase in demand for water as compared to the existing, currently allowable uses. As described above, future projects that would result in the development of new structures on the project site would be evaluated on an individual basis as part of the City’s development review process. Therefore, the proposed project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years. This impact would be less than significant. c. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) Please refer to Response 3.19.a. for a discussion on the project’s impacts to wastewater treatment. The proposed GPA and Rezoning would not result in a substantial increase in demand for wastewater treatment that would exceed the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. This impact would be less than significant. d. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (No Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. This change in the allowed uses would not result in landfill use or capacity because such uses are not likely to generate substantial increases in solid waste as compared to the existing Business Park/Industrial use. Therefore, there would be no impact associated with landfill capacity and waste disposal needs. e. Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (No Impact) As noted in Response 3.19.d, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would not include a new source of solid waste and would not exceed the capacity of any landfills that would serve the proposed project. Therefore, the project would not conflict with applicable solid waste regulations and no impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐57 220 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.20 WILDFIRE Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d. Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post‐fire slope instability, or drainage changes? a. Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (No Impact) The project site is not located within any State responsibility areas (SRA) for fire service,33 and is not within a very high fire hazard severity zone.34 In addition, as noted in Section 3.9.f, the proposed project would not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, and adopted emergency response plan. Therefore, no impact would occur. b. Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? (No Impact) Refer to Section 3.20.a. Additionally, as noted in Section 1.0, Project Information, the project site is bound by existing development on all sides. Therefore, the proposed project would not exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire, and no impact would occur. 33 CalFire. 2008, op. cit. 34 CalFire. 2020. California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Website: https://gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/789d5286736248f69c4515c04f58f414 (accessed September 1, 2020). 3‐58 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 221 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 c. Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (No Impact) Refer to Response 3.20.a. The proposed project is not located within an SRA for fire service and is not within a very high fire hazard severity zone. Therefore, the proposed project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure, and no impact would occur. d. Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post‐fire slope instability, or drainage changes? (No Impact) Refer to Section 3.20.a and 3.20.b. The proposed project would not expose people or structures to significant risks due to post‐fire slope instability or drainage and runoff changes. Therefore, no impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐59 222 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than Potentially Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self‐sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self‐sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (No Impact) Changing the land use and zoning designation at the project site would not adversely affect protected wildlife species as there are no listed sensitive species or habitats in the vicinity, and no new construction is included as part of the proposed project. The project site is currently developed with 16,117‐square‐foot building and associated paved parking. No historic or cultural resources are located on the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would not: 1) degrade the quality of the environment; 2) substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; 3) cause a fish or wildlife species population to drop below self‐sustaining levels; 4) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; 5) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6) eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history. b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Less‐Than‐Significant Impact) The proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. Although this change in the allowed uses within the project site could increase the intensity of use at the site (e.g., increase in employees, vehicle trips), such an increase in intensity would not result 3‐60 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 223 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 in significant impacts. All potential impacts that could result from of the proposed project are considered to be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project’s potential impacts would be individually limited and not cumulatively considerable. No impact would occur. c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (No Impact) As described above, the proposed GPA and Rezoning would allow retail, office, and automotive uses at the project site. Although this change in the allowed uses within the project site could increase the intensity of use at the site, such an increase in intensity would not result in any environmental effects that would cause substantial direct or indirect adverse effects to human beings. No impact would occur. P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 3‐61 224 225 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 Theresa Wallace, AICP, Principal in Charge Shanna Guiler, AICP, Associate, Project Manager Patty Linder, Graphics and Production Charis Hanshaw, Document Management 2491 Alluvial Avenue, PM 626 Clovis, California 93611 Amy Fischer, Principal, Air Quality & Noise Specialist Cara Carlucci, Air Quality and Noise Specialist 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, California 92614 Arthur Black, Associate, Transportation P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 4‐1 226 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 This page intentionally left blank 4‐2 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 227 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 5.0 REFERENCES Alameda County Community Development Agency. 2012. Livermore Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. August. Available online at: www.acgov.org/cda/planning/ generalplans/airportlandplans.htm (accessed September 1, 2020). Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020a. Shaking Scenarios Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab29b35dfcd086 fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020b. Liquefaction Susceptibility Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab 29b35dfcd086fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2020c. Interactive Landslide Hazards Map. Available online at: mtc.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4a6f3f1259df42eab29 b35dfcd086fc8 (accessed September 1, 2020). Association of Bay Area Governments and Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 2013. Plan Bay Area. July 18. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2017. Clean Air Plan. April 19. CalFire. 2008. Alameda County Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. Available online at: osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6638/fhszl_map1.pdf (accessed September 1, 2020). CalFire. 2020. California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Website: https://gis.data.ca.gov/ datasets/789d5286736248f69c4515c04f58f414 (accessed September 1, 2020). California Department of Conservation (DOC). California Farmland Conservancy. California Important Farmland Finder. Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/ (accessed August 27, 2020). California Department of Conservation. 2018. California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application. Website: maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/ (accessed September 1, 2020). California Energy Commission. 2019. 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket # 19‐IEPR‐01. California, State of. 2019. California Official Tsunami Inundation Maps. Website: www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps (accessed September 10, 2020). Dublin, City of. 2017. City of Dublin General Plan. November 21. Available online at: www.dublin.ca.gov/171/General‐Plan#Chapter%201 (accessed December 16, 2020). P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 5‐1 228 P UBLIC R EVIEW D RAFT K ENT P ROPERTY G ENERAL P LAN A MENDMENT AND R EZONING I NITIAL S TUDY/NEGATIVE D ECLARATION D UBLIN, C ALIFORNIA J ANUARY 2021 Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2020. FEMA Flood Map Service Center (map). Website: msc.fema.gov/portal/search?AddressQuery=6207%20Sierra%20Court%2C%20Dublin%2C%2 0CA%20#searchresultsanchor (accessed September 10, 2020). SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC. 2013. Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan, 6400 Sierra Court, Dublin, California. July 1. Available online at: documents.geotracker.water boards.ca.gov/esi/uploads/geo_report/8705445766/SL0600196603.PDF (accessed September 1, 2020). State Water Resources Control Board. 2020. Geotracker Website Application. Available online at: geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=6207+Sierra+Court%2C +Dublin%2C+CA (accessed September 1, 2020). TetraTech. 2018. Tri‐Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. September. Available online at: dublin.ca. gov/DocumentCenter/View/20467/2018‐09‐04_HMP‐Volume‐1‐_Tri‐Valley_FINAL (accessed September 1, 2020). Tri‐Valley History Council. 2011. Tri‐Valley Directory of Historical Resources and Places of Interest. Available online at: www.cityoflivermore.net/civicax/filebank/documents/6884 (accessed September 1, 2020). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. ECOS Environmental Conservation Online System. Website: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/critical‐habitat.html (accessed August 27, 2020). United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. 2019. Web Soil Survey. Available online at: websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm (accessed September 1, 2020). United States Geological Survey. 2018. The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. Website: www.usgs.gov/natural‐hazards/earthquake‐hazards/science/modified‐mercalli‐intensity‐ scale?qt‐science_center_objects=0#qt‐science_center_objects (accessed September 1, 2020). 5‐2 P:\DUB1601.01 Kent Property GPA\PRODUCTS\CEQA\Public Review Draft\KentGPA_Public Review Draft ISND.docx (01/04/21) 229 Attachment 3 ORDINANCE NO. xx-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN AMENDING THE ZONING MAP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6207 SIERRA COURT FROM THE M-1 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE C-2 ZONING DISTRICT (APN 941-0205-013-04) PLPA-2019-00002 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recital A. The City-initiated Rezoning of the Project site, located at 6207 Sierra Court, proposes to change the zoning from M-1 (Light Industrial) to C-2 (General Commercial). B. Following a duly noticed public hearing on January 26, 2021, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 21-01, recommending that the City Council adopt the Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) and approve the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning, which resolution is incorporated herein by reference and available for review at City Hall during normal business hours. C. A Staff Report for the City Council, dated February 16, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the proposed Rezoning. At a properly noticed public hearing on February 16, 2021, the City Council considered the Planning Commission’s recommendation on the IS/ND, General Plan Amendment and Rezoning. Section 2. Findings and Determinations. A. Pursuant to Section 8.120.050.B of the Dublin Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows: 1. The Rezoning is consistent with the Dublin General Plan because: the allowed uses in the C-2 zoning district are consistent with the amended General Plan land use designation of Retail/Office and Automotive. No Specific Plans apply to the project site. B. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), on February 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. xx-21, adopting an Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the project, which Resolution is incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Zoning Map Amendment. Pursuant to Chapter 8.120, Title 8 of the City of Dublin Municipal Code, the Dublin Zoning Map is hereby amended to Rezone the Project site, consisting of 1.5+ gross acres, from the M-1 (Light Industrial) to the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District. A map of the Rezoning area is shown below: Ordinance. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 1 of 2 230 Attachment 3 General Commercial (C-2) Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days following its adoption. Section 5. Posting. The City Clerk of the City of Dublin shall cause this Ordinance to be posted in at least three (3) public places in the City of Dublin in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of _____ 2021 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ______Mayor ATTEST: ______City Clerk 3668428.1 Ordinance. No. XX-21, Item X.X, Adopted XX/XX/21 Page 2 of 2 231 Attachment 4 RESOLUTION NO. 21-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUBLIN RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROJECT AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION AT 6207 SIERRA COURT FROM BUSINESS PARK/INDUSTRIAL TO RETAIL/OFFICE AND AUTOMOTIVE AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M-1) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-2) (APN 941-0205-013-04) PLPA-2019-00002 WHEREAS, the 1.5-acre Project site is located at 6207 Sierra Court at the intersection of Dublin Boulevard and Sierra Court (APNs 941-0205-013-04); and WHEREAS, the existing General Plan land use designation for the Project site is Business Park/Industrial; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to amend the existing General Plan land use designation on the Project site to Retail/Office and Automotive; and WHEREAS, the existing Zoning District for the Project site is Light Industrial (M-1); and WHEREAS, the City proposes to amend the existing Zoning District on the Project site to General Commercial (C-2); and WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), together with the State CEQA Guidelines and City of Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures require that certain projects be reviewed for environmental impacts and when applicable, environmental documents be prepared; and WHEREAS, the City prepared an Initial Study (IS) for the proposed project, which found that there was no substantial evidence that the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning would have a significant adverse effect on the environment and, therefore, pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City prepared a Negative Declaration (ND), dated January 2021, which reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis; and WHEREAS, the IS/ND was circulated for 20 days for public comment from January 6, 2021 to January 26, 2021; and WHEREAS, no comments were received on the IS/ND; and Reso. No. 21-01, Item 5.1, Adopted 01/26/21 Page 1 of 3 232 WHEREAS, Staff Report, dated January 26, 2021, and incorporated herein by reference, described and analyzed the Project, including the General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and associated environmental review; and WHEREAS, consistent with Section 65352.3 of the California Government Code and Section 21080.3.1 of the Public Resource Code, the City obtained a contact list of local Native American tribes from the Native American Heritage Commission and notified the tribes on the contact list of the opportunity to consult with the City on the proposed General Plan Amendment and IS/ND. None of the contacted tribes requested a consultation within the statutory consultation periods and no further action is required; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 2021, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on the Project, at which time all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the IS/ND, all above-referenced reports, recommendations, and testimony to evaluate the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the IS/ND, attached as Exhibit A, based on the following findings: 1. The Planning Commission considered the IS/ND and public comments prior to taking action on the project. 2. The Planning Commission finds, on the basis of the whole record before it, including the IS/ND and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project will have a significant impact on the environment. 3. The IS/ND reflects the City’s independent judgement and analysis as to the potential environmental effects of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning. 4. The IS/ND has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the Dublin CEQA Guidelines and Procedures. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution attached as Exhibit B adopting the IS/ND and amending the General Plan land use designation for the Project site from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive, based on findings that the amended General Plan will remain consistent as so amended. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Ordinance attached as Exhibit C approving amending the Zoning Map for the Project site from Light Industrial (M-1) to General Commercial (C-2) based on findings that the Rezoning is in the public interest, promotes general health, safety and welfare. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 26th day of January 2021 by the following vote: Reso. No. 21-01, Item 5.1, Adopted 01/26/21 Page 2 of 3 233 AYES: GRIER, BENSON, THALBLUM, TYLER NOES: WRIGHT ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE ______Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: ______Assistant Community Development Director 3668429.1 Reso. No. 21-01, Item 5.1, Adopted 01/26/21 Page 3 of 3 234 Kent Property - 6207 Sierra Court General Plan Amendment and Rezoning City Council February 16, 2021 1 235 Project Location 2 236 Project Summary • General Plan Amendment: From Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive • Rezoning: From Light Industrial (M-1) to General Commercial (C-2) 3 237 Site Layout and Access 4 238 General Plan Amendment Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan 5 239 Rezoning Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning 6 240 Environmental Review • Initial Study and Negative Declaration (IS/ND) prepared o Project would not have a significant impact o No Mitigation Measures required o Resolution recommending City Council adopt the IS/ND 7 241 Recommendation • Planning Commission considered proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning on January 26 and recommend that City Council : o Adopt Resolution adopting Initial Study/Negative Declaration and amending General Plan land use designation at 6207 Sierra Court from Business Park/Industrial to Retail/Office and Automotive; and o Adopt Ordinance amending Zoning Map for property located at 6207 Sierra Court from M‐1 zoning district to C‐2 zoning district 8 242 9 243 Agenda Item 8.1 STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL DATE: February 16, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Linda Smith, City Manager SUBJECT: Two-Year Strategic Plan Quarterly Update Prepared by: John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City Council will receive a status update on the City’s Two-Year Strategic Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Receive the report. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. DESCRIPTION: The City Council adopted the City’s Two-Year Strategic Plan on May 5, 2020. This Plan sets the overall direction for the City, guiding resources and setting specific objectives to drive City action. The Plan coincides with Fiscal Years 2020-21 and 2020-22. This report represents the second of eight quarterly Strategic Plan updates, covering the period of October 1, 2020 through December 30, 2020. Updates for the strategies and objectives are provided below: Strategy 1: Implement the City’s Adopted Preferred Vision for Downtown Dublin. Objective Update A Make necessary land use changes. Completed. On July 21, 2020, the City Council adopted amendments to the Downtown Dublin Specific Plan land uses and maximum floor area ratio based on the Preferred Vision. B Work with private property owners on In Progress. On October 15, 2019, the City acquisitions that result in the creation of a Council adopted a Memorandum of future town square. Understanding with one of the Property Owners Page 1 of 7 244 of Dublin Place shopping center, creating a partnership with the City. Through the MOU, the Property Owner intends to acquire additional parcels of the shopping center in order to work with the City on the siting of the town square. In the fall of 2020, the Property Owner made an offer to purchase the remaining parcels, but with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a delay in the response from the other party. In addition, the Property Owner decided they wanted to solicit a development firm for a joint venture opportunity. C Establish the proposed street grid network, In Progress. On July 21, 2020, the City Council including study of right-of-way acquisition and adopted amendments to the Downtown Dublin the appropriate funding mechanism for Specific Plan to incorporate the street grid construction and maintenance. contemplated in the Preferred Vision. The Downtown Action Team continues to evaluate the right-of-way acquisition, cross sections, and the appropriate funding mechanism for construction and maintenance. In fall 2020, the City launched an update to the Citywide Traffic Model which will analyze the impacts of the new street grid. D Conduct a parking analysis of the Transit Not Started. Oriented District and the Retail District and proposed changes. E Create certainty and provide development In Progress. On November 17, 2020, the City rights that result in achieving the City Council reviewed and approved the Downtown Council’s Preferred Vision. Streetscape Master Plan. F Develop implementation measures for the In Progress. In accordance with the newly adopted Downtown Streetscape Master Plan adopted Downtown Streetscape Master and updated Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Plan and the Annual Pavement Resurfacing CIP, for the next Capital Improvement Program. Regional Street was resurfaced and restriped. Staff has completed an existing conditions, demographics, and bicycle level of stress analysis. G Market, in conjunction with Property owners, Not Started. the opportunity sites. H Work with Downtown property owners on In Progress. Staff is working with the Dublin updating the CC&Rs to facilitate retail Plaza Retail Center property owners to amend transition. their CC&Rs. A draft of the changes is being reviewed for initial feedback by the property owners. I Work with Downtown property owners on In Progress. Staff continues to building/site improvements. work with the Dublin Place Shopping Center property owners on an amendment to Page 2 of 7 245 the Master Sign Program to rebrand and add new signage to the Center. The property owner, Bayview Development Group, and Avalon Bay are processing a Building Permit application to construct the 499-unit St. Patrick Way project and related public improvements including the extension of St. Patrick Way to Regional Street. J Refine and provide specificity on City Not Started. development goals in the Downtown Plan and East Transit Center Area Plan. Strategy 2: Explore New City Revenue Streams for Long Term Financial Stability Objective Update A Explore the feasibility of increasing the City’s Not Started. current Transient Occupancy Tax. B Evaluate the establishment of other fees In Progress. Staff enhanced virtual and outdoor and/or taxes that could offset City costs in class programming by offering new enrichment, providing services to the community. martial arts, dance, aerobics, and basketball classes. C Explore operational efficiencies in delivering In Progress. Staff is working with the Town of services with other public agencies. Danville, the Cities of San Ramon and Pleasanton, and the Women’s Club to plan for a Virtual Teen Job and Career Fair to take place in February 2021. Teens will hear from employers, apply for jobs, and attend workshops in a virtual environment. Staff continues to work on developing the AXIS Mental Health Urgent Care Center Pilot with the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton. Staff is engaged in conversations with the County, the Cities of Livermore and Pleasanton, and Stanford-Valley Care on the development of a Super POD COVID-19 Vaccination Site located at the Alameda County Fairgrounds. D Continue to maintain strong fiscal policies. In Progress. A pension trust has been established and additional funds have been contributed to pre-fund pension obligations and to stabilize the pension rate change. Staff has initiated the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget update, including changes in revenue/expenditure forecasts due to COVID-19-related impacts. Page 3 of 7 246 Strategy 3: Create More Affordable Housing Opportunities Objective Update A Facilitate production of affordable housing In Progress. On November 17, 2020, the City for lower income seniors, workforce, and Council received a report on the responses to special needs households by leveraging the the Notice of Funding Availability for affordable Alameda County Measure A-1 Bond funds and housing development using the money in the the City’s Affordable Housing Fund. City’s Affordable Housing Fund and Alameda County Measure A-1 bond funds. BRIDGE Housing has submitted a pre-application for their proposed mixed income residential project. Staff continues to work with them on their proposal following direction received from the City Council. The negotiations between the applicant and the property owner are ongoing and the applicant expects to further refine the project as a result of those negotiations. The pre-application enables Staff and the applicant to begin working out the details of the project for further consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. B Look for additional opportunities to facilitate In Progress. Staff continues to coordinate with the acquisition of sites, at low or no cost, to the developer of the St. Patrick Way project build housing that is affordable to lower regarding the acquisition of the adjacent parcel income households. on Regional Street for development of an affordable housing project by Eden Housing. Staff is also working with Alameda County to acquire the remainder of Transit Center Parcel D-1 in coordination with Eden Housing with the goal to construct affordable housing on the site. C Facilitate the production of accessory In Progress. On November 1, 2020, the City dwelling units throughout the community. Council adopted a reduction to the Impact Fees charged on accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and adopted Zoning Ordinance Amendments that relaxed the development standards and restrictions on ADUs to facilitate the production of those units. Staff is in the process of preparing pre-approved design and construction drawings to further facilitate and streamline the production of ADUs. D Seek opportunities to preserve the stock of In Progress. Staff has been working with the housing that is affordable to moderate- and Catalyst Housing Group on their potential middle-income households. acquisition of the Aster project through the California Community Housing Agency (CalCHA) Joint Powers Authority. This transaction will result in preserving the units at Aster as affordable to middle-income households. The property owner and purchaser are working toward a sale of the property which could occur this spring. Page 4 of 7 247 E Update the City’s General Plan Housing In Progress. On October 6, 2020, the City Element in accordance with state law and to Council received a report and provided Staff ensure an adequate supply of sites to with direction regarding the Housing Element accommodate the City’s Regional Housing Update for the 2023-2031 planning period and Needs Allocation for the period 2023-31. the identification of sites to accommodate the upcoming Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Currently, Staff is completing a sites analysis for review by the City Council this spring. Staff is actively engaged in ABAG’s development of the methodology that will be used to distribute the RHNA to each jurisdiction in the Bay Area. Strategy 4: Become a 24/7 City Hall to Enhance Resident and Business Engagement Objective Update A Reduce/eliminate the need for paper In Progress. Staff has transitioned nearly all transactions where feasible. externally and internally flowing forms to electronic routing and signature. Staff also converted paper applications to online forms for the Holiday Home Decorating program and Special Events Vendors/Sponsorships applications. B Provide more opportunities for residents to In Progress. Staff enhanced the Wave webpages complete transactions with the City online, to allow customers to subscribe to Newsflashes with appropriate security measures. and pertinent Wave information. In addition, the online registration process for the popular Lap Swim program has been streamlined to result in a more user-friendly process to reserve lap swim lanes. C Enhance citizen online interaction via In Progress. The City Manager entered into an reporting of issues and transparent data. agreement with CivicPlus for See, Click, Fix, a new citizen request and City work management software, which will include a City-branded app for mobile devices. D Continue to utilize all appropriate methods to In Progress. Staff expanded the use of Facebook share and exchange information with the to share all news and business of the public, including social media, at events and at City. Additionally, the City is increasing the use the City’s website. of videos, shared on all social media platforms and the City’s website. Examples include public service announcements (PSAs) from the City Council; a disaster preparedness video by the former Mayor; a replay of several “Community Conversations” that were held during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and following the police protests in June; a PSA to explain new fees by third-party delivery companies; and videos in remembrance of Ilene Misheloff. The City also broadcasted the Dublin Holiday Tree Lighting event over Facebook Live. Page 5 of 7 248 Staff has established new coronavirus and business impact webpages on the City’s website to disseminate updated health information for the community as well as rules, regulations, and opportunities for Dublin businesses. The City’s public art collection, both publicly and privately owned, is now available for viewing on the City’s website. Parks and Community Services Staff are now utilizing the text message feature in the City’s recreation software (Active Network) to text program information to customers. The 2020 Dublin Pride Week was completed virtually/online, including the 2nd "Nature in Our Backyard" Photography Contest. E Explore additional social media platforms and Complete. Staff has merged all the previous expanding use of Facebook to other City Facebook accounts (other than The Wave) departments. into one City of Dublin government account. Additionally, Staff transformed the former Parks and Community Services Instagram account into a City of Dublin account. F Explore more exciting and user-friendly In Progress. Staff is developing a monthly City presentation of information, and a periodic newsletter and Dublin Police Annual Report. report from the City Manager’s Office. Strategy 5: Large Land Tract Development and Open Space Objective Update A Look to establish an Economic Development In Progress. Staff is currently developing Zone to prioritize commercial and industrial potential General Plan Amendments and Zoning development east of Fallon Road. Amendments to prioritize and incentivize certain uses that the City Council has deemed desirable for the area. Additionally, Staff is developing concepts to create an Economic Development Zone to further incentive the introduction of these uses. B Work with the area property owners in In Progress. Staff continues to hold meetings conjunction with the Dublin Boulevard with property owners regarding the Dublin extension project on issues such as road and Boulevard Extension and proposed Economic project mitigation, entitlements, as well as Development Zone. The owners of the supporting infrastructure. Branaugh and Righetti properties have both submitted pre-applications to the City and have begun discussion about improvements to their properties in conjunction with the extension of Dublin Boulevard. Page 6 of 7 249 The design phase has begun and is estimated to take 24 months. The City continues working with resource agencies to secure National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearance of the project to facilitate potential Federal funding opportunities for project construction. C Begin discussions regarding required Not Started. reporting under the Open Space Initiative of 2014 for the provisions of commercial and industrial development in the unincorporated area. STRATEGIC PLAN INITIATIVE: None. NOTICING REQUIREMENTS/PUBLIC OUTREACH: The City Council Agenda was posted. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Q1 Strategic Plan Update Page 7 of 7 250 Attachment 1 251 252 253 254 255 Item 8.1 Tw o -Year Strategic Plan Quarterly Update February 16, 2021 256 Background • Current Two-Year Strategic Plan was adopted in May 2020. – Runs concurrently with the City’s two-year budget process. • The plan drives City action by guiding resources and setting specific objectives. • Five total Strategies with numerous Objectives within each Strategy. • Presentation will provide high-level, status update on each strategy. – Second Quarter Review (10/1-12/31/2020) 257 Strategy 1: Implement the City’s Adopted Preferred Vision for Downtown Dublin Ongoing or Completed Activities: – Necessary land use changes adopted by City Council. – Downtown Streetscape Master Plan adopted by City Council. – Entered MOU with one property owner re: partnership for acquisitions to create future town square. – Evaluating ROW acquisition and required infrastructure funding mechanisms ongoing. – Bike/Ped Master Plan update ongoing. – Draft amendments to Dublin Plaza Retail Center CC&Rs under review. – Working with Dublin Place Shopping Center on Amendments to Master Sign Program for Rebranding. – Bayview Development Group/Avalon Bay processing Building Permit application for 499- unit St. Patrick Way Project and related extension of St. Patrick Way to Regional Street. Items yet to Begin: – Transit Oriented District, Retail District Parking Analysis. – Marketing of opportunity sites. – Development goal specificity for Downtown Plan and E. Transit Center Area Plan. 258 Strategy 2: Explore New City Revenue Streams for Long Term Financial Sustainability Ongoing or Completed Activities: – Pension trust established with additional funds contributed to pre- fund pension obligations and to stabilize the pension rate change. – Partnering with Axis Community Health, Alameda County, Livermore, and Pleasanton on Mental Health Urgent Care Center Pilot Program. – City involved with Alameda County, Livermore and Pleasanton regarding COVID-19 Super POD Vaccination Site at the Alameda County Fairgrounds. – Initiated FY 2021-22 Budget Update, including changes due to COVID-19 related impacts. Items Yet to Begin: – Explore feasibility of increasing City’s TOT. 259 Strategy 3: Create More Affordable Housing Opportunities Ongoing or Completed Activities: – Issued NOFA and received two responses for affordable rental housing projects using City Affordable Housing and County Measure A-1 Funds. • BRIDGE Housing submitted pre-application for proposed mixed income project. – Coordinating with St. Patrick Way project developer regarding acquisition of adjacent parcel for Eden Housing Affordable Housing Project. – Working with Alameda County to acquire Transit Center Parcel D-1 for Eden Housing affordable project. – Working with Catalyst Housing Group on potential acquisition of Aster project through CalCHA JPA. – ADU fee reduction adopted by City Council. – Developing pre-approved ADU design/construction drawings to streamline ADU production. – Completing sites analysis for RHNA, Housing Element Update. 260 Strategy 4: Become a 24/7 City Hall to Enhance Resident and Business Engagement Ongoing or Completed Activities – Transitioned nearly all external and internal forms to digital versions. – Planning, Building, and Business License/Permit applications available to be processed online and reviewed electronically. – Continue to streamline and enhance existing websites. Main website redesign ongoing. – Purchased See, Click, Fix citizen request and work order management software. – Expanded Facebook, Instagram to share all news and business of City. – Continue to create videos, graphics for social media accounts. – Developing monthly City newsletter and Dublin Police Annual Report. 261 Strategy 5: Large Land Tract Development and Open Space • Ongoing or Completed Items – Developing potential General Plan and Zoning amendments based on City Council feedback. – Developing Economic Development Zone Incentive Program. – Continuing to meet with property owners regarding Dublin Boulevard Extension. • Branaugh and Righetti properties have submitted pre-applications. • Items Yet to Begin – Begin discussions regarding required reporting under the Open Space Initiative of 2014 for the provisions of commercial and industrial development in the unincorporated area. 262 Questions? John Stefanski, Assistant to the City Manager 263