MONTHLY April 2017 CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MONTHLY April 2017 CONTENTS MONTHLY April 2017 CONTENTS 7 25 35 GAME RUSSIAN MEDVEDEV CHANGER MERCENARIES IN SYRIA UNDER FIRE ATTACK IN LONDON SHARPLY 3 ST. PETERSBURG 22 CRITICIZES RUSSIA A NARRATIVE RUSSIAN 4 IN RUINS 25 MERCENARIES IN SYRIA WHERE WILL BEAR’S AIR 5 RUSSIA STRIKE? 26 PROVOCATIONS GAME ELECTORAL 7 CHANGER 27 INTRIGUE SERBIAN DOOMED 8 SLALOM 28 FOR IRAN THE ANNEXATION ON THE POSITION OF KADYROV 10 CAUCASUS IS GETTING CLOSER 30 IS GETTING WEAKER MOLDAVIAN SCORES, RUSSIA IS TEMPTING 11 A RUSSIAN LINK 31 DUTERTE NATIVE MOSCOW FUELS 13 TERRORISTS 32 A CONFLICT IN THE BALKANS A GRU SPY IS SOMEONE 14 IN ESTONIA 34 BEHIND NAVALNY? OIL WAR BETWEEN MEDVEDEV 16 KADYROV AND SECHIN 35 UNDER FIRE YET ANOTHER DISMISSAL, A SHOCK A SHOWCASE 17 FOR THE SYSTEM OF POWER 36 SENTENCE FOR A GENERAL GAS RETREAT FROM A TIE 20 CENTRAL ASIA 38 IN THE HAGUE A COLD WAR 21 IN AFGHANISTAN www.warsawinstitute.org 2 © EPA/ANATOLY MALTSEV PAP/EPA 4 April 2017 ATTACK IN ST. PETERSBURG An explosion that killed 14 people occurred on Monday in a subway car, between two stations. The attack brings Kremlin some profits. t marginalizes the topic of Medvedev’s According to the official interpretation, Icorruption as well as the strong explosion enemies of the regime, allegedly supported of public anti-regime emotions, surprising by western secret services, want to destabilize for the observers and for the authorities Russia and to weaken Putin before the themselves, manifested in the recent wave of presidential elections, scheduled for 2018. demonstrations. A year before the elections, Russia’s Investigative Committee said that Putin will use the attack to suppress the the attacker behind the blast was Akbarzhon opposition more ruthlessly. Besides, it cannot Jalilov. He was born in the city of Osh in be excluded that the attack will be used as Kyrgyzstan. His relatives have said that since a playing card in conflicts within the ruling 2011 he’s lived in Russia with his parents. elite, or even within the security apparatus. When the family moved back home, he As usual in such circumstances, Moscow goes stayed in Russia. Identifying him as the back to saying that it is necessary to tighten bomber suggests that the version of a terrorist antiterrorist cooperation with the West, attack mounted by Islamists having some on Russian terms obviously. This is meant connections with the war in Syria will prevail. to weaken the sanctions on Russia for its It should be remembered that thousands of annexation of the Crimea. comers from Central Asia have fought or are still fighting in the ranks of the Islamic State. Kremlin propaganda promptly linked It’s not clear how will the authorities link the the attack with the recent anticorruption assassin with actions taken by the opposition. campaign of the activists such as Navalov Eventually, they may force the thesis that the and with the ensuing street demonstrations. attack wouldn’t have happened if in recent www.warsawinstitute.org 3 weeks the law enforcement authorities didn’t Jihadists connected with the war in Syria and have to focus on the “subversive” activities with the Islamic State. The said social contract against the regime. amounts to the following deal: the government ensures security and in exchange the society As expected, soon after the attack the gives up a part of its freedom. With every new authorities have imposed some new more notorious attack, Russians have less and less stringent regulations, thus strengthening of this freedom but still – as we can see – they control of security services over the society. are not protected from terrorism. And they Putin sticks to the political agenda conceived will never be fully protected, since the goal of already in 1999, assuming that the foundation Putin is not to protect his fellow countrymen. for a social contract of a kind is the fight Rather, he plays with the terrorist threat against terrorism. First, the target were to tighten the grip of the regime and to Chechens, then, more broadly, the North strengthen his mandate each time when it Caucasian Islamists, and more recently – the begins to weaken. © STRINGER PAP_EPA 5 April 2017 A NARRATIVE IN RUINS At least 86 people have died in a chemical attack of 4 April on the rebel-hold town of Khan Sheikhoun in the Idlib Governorate in north-western Syria. The casualties include 30 children and 20 women. The attack was most probably launched by Syrian or Russian aircrafts. The Assad regime denies the charges, same as Russia, which propagates a thesis that the tragedy happened in result of an air strike hitting a rebel depot full of chemical munitions. However, the US administration rejects such explanation. www.warsawinstitute.org 4 he use of chemical weapons in Syria by as is this case, in Russia. Kremlin’s reasoning is Tthe regime forces, and not for the first simple: either the West will agree to cooperate time, caused a storm in the world of politics, with Moscow on the issue of terrorism and and it can already be said that this torpedoed will give up on other issues (e.g. Ukraine) or any possibilities of even basic cooperation it will not, and then Moscow will have yet between the US and Russia in this conflict. another argument to criticize the West. The Washington will go back to its harsh rhetoric use of chemical weapons immediately after against Assad, even though recently Trump’s the tragedy in St Petersburg and all its political administration is said not to press so much for consequences is an argument for rejecting the removing the dictator. The attack in Idlib has theory that the attack was a provocation of totally destroyed the narrative that Moscow Russian services. It would make no sense to has been trying to impose for the last few destroy the antiterrorist narrative just after it days, namely that West should tighten its has been created. Or maybe the coordination antiterrorist cooperation with Russia. This has failed and those deciding to use the has been the message from Kremlin after gas against civilians did not take Kremlin’s the metro attack in St Petersburg, which was reasoning into account. The question arises: swiftly linked with the Jihadists, the Islamic did they do this unwittingly or, on the State and Syria. A similar scenario is repeated contrary, intentionally, to harm Putin. after each major Islamist attack in the West or, 6 April 2017 WHERE WILL RUSSIA STRIKE? Ukraine and Georgia alarm that Russia concentrates more and more armed forces at their borders. What’s more, the nature of this concentration expressly suggests Moscow’s offensive intentions. The attack in St Petersburg may lead to recrudescence of Kremlin’s war rhetoric, in line with the old principle that Russian regime tends to export its internal problems. The best way to divert attention from destabilization at home is a “little victorious war” with a much weaker neighbor. This strategy has proven effective thus far. It is sufficient to mention the second Chechen war, the annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbass, and last but not least the war expedition to Syria. he attack in St Petersburg metro has been popularity of Vladimir Putin as much as T used by the pro-government media to external conflicts, especially the victorious fuel the anti-Ukrainian rhetoric. Aleksandr ones. Also, an increase has been noticeable Mikhailov, a retired general and former in in the activity of pro-Russian rebels in spokesman for FSB, said to the Moskovsky Donbass who seem to ignore the ceasefire, Komsomolts that Ukrainian nationals might which should have come into effect on 1 April, have some connections with the attack. Also and heavily shell the Ukrainian positions Komsomolskaya Pravda brought accusations as well as the civilians. Ukrainian Deputy addressed at “Ukrainian radicals”. This Minister for Defense, Ivan Rusnak, when rhetoric may be an introduction to the appearing on 5 April before the NATO – escalation of warfare against Ukraine. The Ukraine Commission stated that Russia had conflict with Kiev may become a leitmotiv gathered around 43 thousand soldiers at the before the presidential elections in Russia border with Ukraine: 24 thousand in the to be held next year. Nothing boosts the Crimea, 18 thousand in mainland Russia and www.warsawinstitute.org 5 © EPA/VADIM GRISHANKIN/RUSSIAN DEFENCE MINISTRY PAP/EPA 1 thousand in Transnistria. 36 thousand rebels in the case of war. On the other hand, such and 3 thousand Russian soldiers in Donbass systems as Bastion in the Crimea severely should be added to the above numbers. obstruct access to Georgia by sea. The core of the 49th Army (the staff in Stavropol) and However, not only Ukraine feels threatened. the 58th Army (the 9th staff in Vladikavkaz) The recent inclusion of separatist armed are stationed no more than 250 km from the forces in South Ossetia into Russian military Georgian border. Russian 102nd Military structures reminds us about Russia’s military Base in Gyumri in Armenia is situated only potential in the Caucasus. The military 35 km form the Georgian border. All these situation in Georgia is today much weaker military assets are under administration of than it was in 2008. Russian forces are bigger, the Southern Military District, which since better armed, reformed, and have military July 2016, it is under command of General experience gained in Ukraine and Syria. Aleksandr Dvornikov, former chief of Russian Besides, they are deployed much closer to the operations in Syria. strategic positions in Georgia. The town of Gori and the strategic East-West highway are In the current situation the advantage of within the firing range of Russian artillery.
Recommended publications
  • Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia
    Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson SILK ROAD PAPER January 2018 Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia Niklas Nilsson © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center American Foreign Policy Council, 509 C St NE, Washington D.C. Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Russian Hybrid Tactics in Georgia” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia- Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program, Joint Center. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council and the Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Moscow, Leninskie
    Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Thursday, September 08th, 2016 09:00-09:30 Reception and Registration 09:30-10:00 Conference Opening Round Table «Academic Research and Economic Policy-making» Participants: Andrey Belousov* (President Administration), Arkadiy 10:00-11:30 Dvorkovitch* (Government of Russia), Galina Hale (FRB San-Francisco), Andrey Klepatch (MSU), Alexey Ulyukaev* (Ministry of Economic Development), Ksenia Yudaeva (Bank of Russia), Chair: Elvira Nabiullina (Bank of Russia) 11:30-12:00 Coffee-break Irina Kirisheva (’06, Nazarbayev University) 12:00-12:45 Contests with sabotage and their optimal design Anna Chorniy (’06, Princeton) 12:45-13:30 Health economics: Human capital framework 13:30-15:00 Lunch Bank of Russia Workshop 15:00-15:45 DSGE modeling for policymaking in an Emerging market economy: some experience of the Bank of Russia Ruben Enikolopov (Barselona GSE, NES) 16:00-16:45 Social Media and Collective Action Oleg Itskhoki (‘03, Princeton) 16:45-17:30 Firms and the International Transmission of Shocks 17:30-18:00 Coffee-break Keynote Speech 18:00-19:15 Helene Rey (London Business School) TBA Moscow, Leninskie Gory, 1-46 MSU Department of Economics, Lecture Hall, П5 Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Friday, September 09th, 2016 Round Table «Modern Universities and Economic Education» Speakers: Alexey Belyanin (HSE), Shlomo Weber* (NES), Oleg Zamulin* 10:00-11:30 (NES), Oleg Itskhoki (Princeton), Philipp Kartaev (MSU), Evgeniy Kuznetsov (RVC), Andrey Markov (MSU) Chair: Alexandr Auzan 11:30-12:00 Coffee-break Vilen Lipatov (’98,Compass Lexecon) 12:00-12:45 Competition Policy Michael Alexeev (’75, Indiana University) 12:45-13:30 The 'Oil Curse' and Institutions: A Brief Survey 13:30-15:30 Lunch.
    [Show full text]
  • OHCHR) Under Human Rights Council Resolution A/HRC/43/37
    Submission for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) under Human Rights Council resolution A/HRC/43/37 June 2020 This is the second written submission for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to providing information on the human rights situation in occupied Abkhazia, Georgia, and the occupied Tskhinvali region/South Ossetia, Georgia under the HRC resolution A/HRC/43/37. The submission is provided by the Human Rights Education and Monitoring Center (EMC), a human rights organization, that works to support the creation of a free, equal society based on solidarity. EMC covers existing challenges and works on structural violence and repression in an interdisciplinary manner. Furthermore, EMC’s Equality Policy Program is engaged in assessing and advocacy of human rights challenges in the occupied territories of Georgia, Due to the lack of a political and legal solution to the prolonged conflict in the mentioned two regions, the protection of human rights is challenged and undermined. For decades this situation is deteriorating and unfortunately, the resolution is frequently politicized and is used by the political powers to gain additional leverage over each other. In particular, de facto authorities and the Russian Federation are often using their de facto and effective control over the region to gain further political power via their discriminatory policies towards ethnic Georgians living in these territories. Furthermore, their policies are infringing social, political and civil rights of Abkhazians and Ossetians as self-isolation and restrictive approaches affect their fundamental rights, including freedom of movement, education, right to adequate healthcare, etc. Bearing in mind the limited space of the submission we would like to highlight several problems applicable to the reporting period only.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Intervention in Ukraine Reverberates in Central Asia
    Central(Asia,Caucasus( Analyst( ! BI$WEEKLY!BRIEFING! VOL.!16!NO.!06! ! ! 19!MARCH!2014! ! Contents!! ! Analytical!Articles! ! CRIMEA!IS!NOT!A!PAWN!ON!THE!UKRAINE!CHESS!BOARD!>!RUSSIA!IS!THERE!TO! STAY! ! !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!!3!! Avinoam!Idan! ! THE!CRIMEAN!CRISIS!AND!GEORGIA'S!BREAKAWAY!TERRITORIES! !! !!!!6! Valeriy!Dzutsev! ! RUSSIA'S!INTERVENTION!IN!UKRAINE!REVERBERATES!IN!CENTRAL!ASIA! !!!!9! Slavomír!Horák! ! THE!COST!OF!BLACK!TUESDAY!FOR!KAZAKHSTAN! ! ! ! !!!13! Birgit!Brauer! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Field!Reports! ! BISHKEK'S!FIRST!OFFICIAL!STATEMENT!ON!UKRAINE!!!! ! ! ! !!!16! Arslan!Sabyrbekov! ! GEORGIAN!PARLIAMENT!AMENDS!ELECTION!CODE!AHEAD!OF!SPRING!LOCAL! ELECTIONS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! !!!18! Eka!Janashia! ! TURKMENISTAN!INTRODUCES!NEW!MEASURES!TO!CONSERVE!NATURAL!GAS!!20! Tavus!Rejepova! ! FEMINIST!ACTIVISTS!ATTACKED!IN!OSH,!KYRGYZSTAN! ! ! ! !!22! Ebi!Spahiu!! THE(CENTRAL(ASIA,CAUCASS(ANALYST! ( ( Editor:(Svante(E.(Cornell( ( Associate(Editor:(Niklas(Nilsson( ( Assistant(Editor,(News(Digest:(Alima(Bissenova( ( Chairman,(Editorial(Board:(S.(Frederick(Starr( ! The!Central!Asia.Caucasus!Analyst(is(an(English,language(journal(devoted(to(analysis(of(the(current(issues(facing( Central(Asia(and(the(Caucasus.(It(serves(to(link(the(business,(governmental,(journalistic(and(scholarly(communities( and(is(the(global(voice(of(the(Central(Asia,Caucasus(Institute(&(Silk(Road(Studies(Program(Joint(Center.(The(Editor( of(the(Analyst(solicits(most(articles(and(field(reports,(however(authors(are(encouraged(to(suggest(topics(for(future( issues(or(submit(articles(and(field(reports(for(consideration.(Such(articles(and(field(reports(cannot(have(been(
    [Show full text]
  • Akhalgori Deadlock
    Contributor to the publication: Giorgi Kanashvili Responsible for the publication: Ucha Nanuashvili English text editor: Vikram Kona Copyrights: Democracy Research Institute (DRI) This report is developed by the Democracy Research Institute (DRI), within the project Supporting Human Rights Protection at Front Line, with the financial support of the European Endowment for Democracy (EED). The project aims at protecting human rights in conflict- affected territories which, among others, implies monitoring of the situation in terms of human rights protection to fill information lacunae. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the position of the EED. Tbilisi 2021 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 4 THE CONTEXT: GEORGIAN-OSSETIAN RELATIONS SINCE 2008 ....................................... 4 THE SITUATION OF THE POPULATION OF AKHALGORI BEFORE THE CHORCHANA- TSNELISI CRISIS ............................................................................................................................... 6 THE CHORCHANA-TSNELISI CRISIS AND CREEPING ETHNIC CLEANSING IN AKHALGORI ........................................................................................................................................ 8 THE FUTURE OF THE POPULATION OF AKHALGORI AND THE POLICY TO BE PURSUED BY GEORGIAN AUTHORITIES ................................................................................ 10 03 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • How to Succeed in the New Economy? New Mindset, Management Models and Business Processes
    How to succeed in the new economy? New mindset, management models and business processes Sokos Hotel Olympia Garden (Bataisky pereulok, 3A, St. Petersburg) Programme (draft) Last Update: February 27, 2018 Thursday, 5 April 2018 08:00–09:15 REGISTRATION OF THE PARTICIPANTS (Lobby, 2nd floor) 09:15–10:30 INAUGURATION CEREMONY (Hall “The Americas”) Moderator: Frank Schauff, CEO, Association of European Businesses (AEB) . Alexey Mordashov, Chairman of the Board of Directors, PAO “Severstal”; Co- Chairman of the Northern Dimension Business Council (NDBC); . Rolf Jansson, President and CEO, VR Group; Co-Chairman of the Northern Dimension Business Council (NDBC); . Alexander Beglov, Plenipotentiary Presidential Envoy in the Northwest Federal District (tbc); . Georgiy Poltavchenko, Governor of Saint Petersburg (tbc); . Alexander Drozdenko, Governor of Leningrad Oblast (tbc); . NN, Deputy Minister, RF Ministry of Foreign Affairs (tbc); . Markus Ederer, EU Ambassador to the RF (tbc); . Thomas Staertzel, Chairman of the Board, Association of European Businesses (AEB). Reports of Northern Dimension Partnerships Oddgeir Danielsen, Northern Dimension Partnership on Transportation and Logistics (NDPTL); Ewa Manik, Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership (NDEP); Ilze Gailite-Holmberg, Northern Dimension Partnership on Culture (NDPC); Piia Heliste, Northern Dimension Institute (NDI). 10:30–11:00 COFFEE BREAK (Lobby) 11:00–13:00 PLENARY SESSION (Hall “The Americas”) Moderator: Alexey Mordashov, Chairman of the Board of Directors PAO “Severstal”; Co-Chairman of the Northern Dimension Business Council (NDBC) New economy, new management models and business processes: how could they impact the economic and social development of the Northern Dimension area? . Paavo Lipponen, Prime Minister of Finland (1995–2003) (tbc); . Andrey Sharonov, President, Moscow Skolkovo Management School (tbc): .
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's South Ossetia Dilemma
    The European Union’s South Ossetia Dilemma Written by Stefan Wolff This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. The European Union’s South Ossetia Dilemma https://www.e-ir.info/2011/12/10/the-european-union%e2%80%99s-south-ossetia-dilemma/ STEFAN WOLFF, DEC 10 2011 If it wasn’t for the potentially serious ramifications of a further escalation of the current election crisis in South Ossetia, the situation would be laughable. But even though, it is not without certain ironies. Moscow’s preferred candidate in the presidential run-off on 27 November, emergency situations minister Anatoly Bibilov, was, according to preliminary results, defeated with a 60:40 margin by former education minister Alla Dzhioyeva, who campaigned on an anti-corruption platform. As the defeat became clear, Bibliov appealed to the South Ossetian Supreme Court to annul the elections because of alleged fraud committed by his opponent. The Supreme Court obliged, banned the release of final results, and the South Ossetian parliament subsequently set a date for new elections on 25 March 2012, in which Dzhioyeva is currently barred from running. The Supreme Court’s ruling came despite the fact that the head of Russian State Duma’s election observer mission, Olga Borbovskaya, had declared at a press conference on the evening of 27 November that the elections were free and fair. What is remarkable about this is that despite a ringing endorsement from the incumbent South Ossetian president, Edvard Kokoity (who respected the two-term constitutional term limit and did not run again, although he has now been handed an extension of his term till March next year), and an audience with Russian President Medvedev just days before the run-off, Bibliov was defeated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2017
    INSIDE: l WFUWO at U.N. Commission on the Status of Women – page 5 l Vitaly Portnikov: sober voice in post-Maidan Ukraine – page 8 l Our community: Miami, Boston, Philadelphia – page 14 THEPublished U by theKRAINIAN Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal W non-profit associationEEKLY Vol. LXXXV No. 21 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, MAY 21, 2017 $2.00 Portugal wins Eurovision Song Contest, Poroshenko lauds closer ties with EU, Ukraine touts contest as great success admits ‘there’s much left to be done’ KYIV – Portugal was the top vote-getter inspired by the Soviet authorities’ mass in the 2017 Eurovision Song Contest, the deportation of Crimean Tatars to Central annual festival traditionally watched by a Asia in that year. The Crimean Tatar singer television audience of an estimated 200 returned to the contest this year, singing her million people. Some 4 million people new song “I Believe in U” as an interval act watched the contest’s grand final, breaking during the grand final on May 13. previous records, according to the official President Petro Poroshenko met with website of Eurovision 2017. organizers and hosts of the European Singer Salvador Sobral was declared the music contest and congratulated them on winner early on May 14 in the Ukrainian the successful completion of the contest. capital of Kyiv, giving Portugal its first victory “My sincere congratulations to you all. since it initially entered the contest in 1964. Eurovision 2017 was organized at a very The winner was determined by a combina- high level. This is the result of a very effi- tion of points awarded by national juries and cient coordination and interaction of your voting by telephone and text message from and our team,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Information Environment Through the Lens
    GEORGIA’S INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF RUSSIA’S INFLUENCE PREPARED BY THE NATO STRATEGIC COMMMUNICATIONS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE 1 Georgia’s Information Environment through the Lens of Russia’s Influence Project Director: Elīna Lange-Ionatamišvili Project Manager: James McMillan Content Editors: Elīna Lange-Ionatamišvili, James McMillan Language Editors: Tomass Pildagovičs, James McMillan Authors: Nino Bolkvadze, Ketevan Chachava, Gogita Ghvedashvili, Elīna Lange-Ionat- amišvili, James McMillan, Nana Kalandarishvili, Anna Keshelashvili, Natia Kuprashvili, Tornike Sharashenidze, Tinatin Tsomaia Design layout: Tornike Lordkipanidze We would like to thank our anonymous peer reviewers from King’s College London for their generous contribution. ISBN: 978-9934-564-36-9 This publication does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO StratCom COE. © All rights reserved by the NATO StratCom COE. Reports may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO StratCom COE. The views expressed here do not represent the views of NATO. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 1: GEORGIA’S STRATEGIC INTERESTS ................................................6 By Tornike Sharashenidze CHAPTER 2: RUSSIA’S STRATEGIC INTERESTS IN GEORGIA .......................... 18 By Nana Kalandarishvili
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Russia: President Putin's Visit to Japan
    Chapter 6 Russia: President Putin’s Visit to Japan Hiroshi Yamazoe (lead author, Sections 1 (3), 2 (1) & (2), and 3 (1) & (3)) and Shigeki Akimoto (Sections 1 (1) & (2), 2 (3), and 3 (2)) ussia currently faces not only severe economic and financial conditions, Rbut also an ongoing confrontation with the Western nations stemming from the Ukraine crisis. Amid this situation, the Kremlin is seen to be pursuing carefully thought-out policies on both the domestic and foreign relations fronts from the perspective of governance over the medium-to-long term. In the election of deputies of the State Duma (the lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russia) held in September 2016, the ruling United Russia party won an overwhelming majority of seats. During the year, the administration also demonstrated its willingness to elevate younger officials to positions of influence. These developments could imply that President Vladimir Putin has begun laying the groundwork for a political framework that will enable the administration to continue functioning effectively even if he himself leaves the political arena. On the diplomatic front, while the situation remains tense in Eastern Europe, the Putin administration continues to take steps to enhance Russia’s presence on the international stage through military operations and diplomatic negotiations relating to the Syrian crisis. While welcoming the start of the new administration of President Donald Trump—who has been calling for better relations with Russia—the Putin administration shows no signs of abandoning its cautious stance regarding concrete steps toward the normalization of relations between the two countries. In its relationships with the nations of East Asia, the Kremlin continues to seek stronger working relations with China, which it regards as an important partner, while at the same time taking steps to avoid an over-reliance on China and to build a sustainable relationship with Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • JSC VTB Bank ANNUAL REPORT 2011
    VTB 2011 ANNUAL REPORT JSC VTB Bank ANNUAL REPORT 2011 1 VTB 2011 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS Mission and values Statement of the Chairman of the Supervisory Council Statement of the President and Chairman of the Management Board 1. Financial highlights 2. VTB’s market position 3. The economy and banking sector 4. Management report 4.1. Key events in 2011 4.2. VTB Group strategy 4.3. Review of operating performance 4.3.1. Corporate and investment banking 4.3.2. Retail banking 4.3.3. Other businesses 4.3.4. Business outside of Russia 4.4. Review of financial performance 4.5. Risk management 5. Corporate governance 5.1. Overview of the corporate governance system 5.2. Development of the corporate governance system in 2011 5.3. The General Shareholders Meeting of JSC VTB Bank 5.4. The Supervisory Council of JSC VTB Bank 5.5. The Management Board of JSC VTB Bank 5.6. Remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Council and the Management Board of JSC VTB Bank 5.7. Internal control and audit 5.8. Relations with individual shareholders 5.9. Relations with institutional investors 5.10. Management of VTB Group 6. Corporate social responsibility 6.1. Personnel 6.2. Responsible resource management 6.3. Social programmes 7. Management responsibility statement 8. Summary consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 9. Summary financial statements in accordance with RAS 10. Transactions of JSC VTB Bank 11. Other Group information 11.1. Details of JSC VTB Bank 11.2. Licences of JSC VTB Bank 11.3. Contact information 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian-Venezuelan Relations at a Crossroads Vladimir Rouvinski*
    Latin American Program | Kennan Institute | February 2019 President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela receives a book in Russian about Hugo Chávez from President Vladimir Putin of Russia. Photo by www.kremlin.ru / Creative Commons 4.0 Russian-Venezuelan Relations at a Crossroads Vladimir Rouvinski* Russia’s foreign policy is part of a complex tapestry intended to bolster its current president, Vladimir Putin. Moscow’s relations with Venezuela are a prime example of this strategy. Russian engagement with the Bolivarian Republic demonstrates Vladimir Putin’s global ambitions to recruit geographically distant nations as partners in constructing a new multipolar, anti-U.S. world order. The Russian government has learned to bolster domestic support for Putin at home by taking advantage of situations unfolding in the Russian “far abroad” as elements of a political spectacle portraying Russia’s return as a global power. Russia’s relationship with Venezuela is also a story of missed business opportunities, multi-million dollar risky investments, dubious personal enrichment, and vast corruption. It also features denials, by a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, of massive human rights violations in Venezuela in the name of “21st Century Socialism.” Three key aspects of interaction between Moscow and Caracas are essential to understand the Russia’s policy toward the region and Venezuela in particular. First is Russia’s “return” to Latin America toward the end of the 1990s and subsequent events LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM LATIN AMERICAN PROGRAM leading to the present challenges. Second is the role of political priorities rather than business interests that comprise the true guiding principles of the Russian involvement in the key sectors of the Venezuelan economy such as oil and gas.
    [Show full text]