The Laestadian Movement: Disputes and Divisions 1861 - 2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Laestadian Movement: Disputes and Divisions 1861 - 2000 The Laestadian Movement: Disputes and Divisions 1861 - 2000 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved . (Matthew 24:12-13) WARREN H. HEPOKOSKI First published in 1997 under the title: The Laestadian Movement: Disputes and Divisions 1861--1997 Revised and Updated Edition Culpeper, Virginia 2002 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1: EARLY ISSUES.......................................................................................................3 Cold Jumping and Holy Flesh .........................................................................................................3 Confession of Sin.............................................................................................................................5 Compulsory Confession...................................................................................................................7 Public Confession............................................................................................................................8 The Three-Cubit God.......................................................................................................................9 Pastor Grape and Princess Eugénie ...............................................................................................10 The Oral and Written Word...........................................................................................................12 The Bible a Dead Letter?...............................................................................................................13 Christ’s Descent into Hell..............................................................................................................14 CHAPTER 2: THE REAWAKENING.........................................................................................16 Origin.............................................................................................................................................16 The Third Use of the Law..............................................................................................................18 The Narva Reaction .......................................................................................................................20 The Oulu Reconciliation Meeting .................................................................................................21 Issues and Schisms ........................................................................................................................25 Typpö’s Summary..........................................................................................................................26 CHAPTER 3: THE FIRSTBORN GROUP..................................................................................28 Origin.............................................................................................................................................28 Takkinen Era Begins......................................................................................................................29 The Hallites....................................................................................................................................31 Who are the Firstborn? ..................................................................................................................31 Takkinen Era Ends.........................................................................................................................32 The 1897 Lannavaara Services......................................................................................................35 Did Raattamaa Bless Purnu? .........................................................................................................36 The 1901 Gällivare Meeting..........................................................................................................38 Internal Dissension ........................................................................................................................39 Conservative Views of the Firstborn .............................................................................................41 CHAPTER 4: THE LITTLE FIRSTBORN.................................................................................43 Origin.............................................................................................................................................43 The Annual Conventions...............................................................................................................43 Evert Määttälä’s Book ...................................................................................................................45 Expulsion of the Conventionists....................................................................................................47 CHAPTER 5: THE SRK GROUP.................................................................................................50 Origin.............................................................................................................................................50 Carnality and the 1916 Discussion ................................................................................................51 The Fear of the Lord...................................................................................................................... 53 Cliques Emerge in Finland............................................................................................................ 55 Toivo Korpela ............................................................................................................................... 56 The Revised Finnish Bible ............................................................................................................ 57 The Flying Ark .............................................................................................................................. 58 Millennialism ................................................................................................................................ 60 The Kalajoki Revival .................................................................................................................... 60 Ansamaa’s Recantation................................................................................................................. 63 The 1939 Kemi Resolution ........................................................................................................... 64 The Drive Against Simppala......................................................................................................... 65 The Campaigns Against Kosonen ................................................................................................. 66 Recantations of Kosonen’s Friends............................................................................................... 67 Expulsion of the Clericalists ......................................................................................................... 69 The Authority to Forgive Sins....................................................................................................... 71 The Case of Daniel Airas .............................................................................................................. 72 Minor Groups ................................................................................................................................ 74 Sillanpää’s Group.......................................................................................................................... 75 CHAPTER 6: FRAGMENTATION IN NORWAY.................................................................... 76 Koskamo and Palovaara................................................................................................................ 76 Erik Johnsen.................................................................................................................................. 78 Vanhala vs. Brune ......................................................................................................................... 79 CHAPTER 7: DISINTEGRATION IN AMERICA.................................................................... 81 Three Legalist Preachers ............................................................................................................... 81 Paul Heideman vs. John Pollari .................................................................................................... 81 Heidemanian Accusations............................................................................................................. 83 The Reaction of the Evangelicals.................................................................................................. 84 The Törölä - AALC Schism .......................................................................................................... 85 Lamppa, Mäki and Koskela........................................................................................................... 86 Arthur Romberg ............................................................................................................................ 87 Ben Salmela................................................................................................................................... 88 Matt Reed vs. Aunes Salmela ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Right to Peace, Which Occurred on 19 December 2016 by a Majority of Its Member States
    In July 2016, the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations in Geneva recommended to the General Assembly (UNGA) to adopt a Declaration on the Right to Peace, which occurred on 19 December 2016 by a majority of its Member States. The Declaration on the Right to Peace invites all stakeholders to C. Guillermet D. Fernández M. Bosé guide themselves in their activities by recognizing the great importance of practicing tolerance, dialogue, cooperation and solidarity among all peoples and nations of the world as a means to promote peace. To reach this end, the Declaration states that present generations should ensure that both they and future generations learn to live together in peace with the highest aspiration of sparing future generations the scourge of war. Mr. Federico Mayor This book proposes the right to enjoy peace, human rights and development as a means to reinforce the linkage between the three main pillars of the United Nations. Since the right to life is massively violated in a context of war and armed conflict, the international community elaborated this fundamental right in the 2016 Declaration on the Right to Peace in connection to these latter notions in order to improve the conditions of life of humankind. Ambassador Christian Guillermet Fernandez - Dr. David The Right to Peace: Fernandez Puyana Past, Present and Future The Right to Peace: Past, Present and Future, demonstrates the advances in the debate of this topic, the challenges to delving deeper into some of its aspects, but also the great hopes of strengthening the path towards achieving Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Concord FAQ God's Word
    would be no objective way to make sure that there is faithful teaching and preaching of The Book of Concord FAQ God's Word. Everything would depend on each pastor's private opinions, subjective Confessional Lutherans for Christ’s Commission interpretations, and personal feelings, rather than on objective truth as set forth in the By permission of Rev. Paul T. McCain Lutheran Confessions. What is the Book of Concord? Do all Lutheran churches have the same view of the Book of Concord? The Book of Concord is a book published in 1580 that contains the Lutheran No. Many Lutheran churches in the world today have been thoroughly influenced by the Confessions. liberal theology that has taken over most so-called "mainline" Protestant denominations in North America and the large Protestant state churches in Europe, Scandinavia, and elsewhere. The foundation of much of modern theology is the view that the words of What are the Lutheran Confessions? the Bible are not actually God's words but merely human opinions and reflections of the The Lutheran Confessions are ten statements of faith that Lutherans use as official ex- personal feelings of those who wrote the words. Consequently, confessions that claim planations and summaries of what they believe, teach, and confess. They remain to this to be true explanations of God's Word are now regarded more as historically day the definitive standard of what Lutheranism is. conditioned human opinions, rather than as objective statements of truth. This would explain why some Lutheran churches enter into fellowship arrangements with What does Concord mean? non-Lutheran churches teaching things in direct conflict with the Holy Scriptures and the Concord means "harmony." The word is derived from two Latin words and is translated Lutheran Confessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism
    TLC 4 TLC THEOLOgy in thE LifE OF thE Church Vol. 4 The spread and influence of diverse expressions of Pentecostalism through out the world, especially in Africa, is posing significant challenges to Lutheran as well as other churches. At a seminar of the Lutheran World Federation in South Africa, theologians discussed how they are responding to these challenges. Articles in this book highlight how some Lutheran convictions to Respond Pentecostalism Lutherans and understandings can counter, balance or expand upon Pentecostal beliefs and practices. Contributors include: J. Kwabena Asamoah-Gyadu, Ghana; Ibrahim Bitrus, Nigeria; Musawenkosi Biyela, South Africa; Samuel Dawai, Cameroon; Hans-Peter Grosshans, Germany; Guillermo Hansen, Argentina/USA; Paul John Isaak, Namibia/Switzerland; Rogate Mshana, Tanzania/Switzerland; Sarojini Nadar, South Africa; Cheryl S. Pero, USA; Gertrud Tönsing, South Africa; and Galana Babusa Yako, Kenya. Lutherans Respond The editor, Karen L. Bloomquist, directs the Department for Theology and Studies, LWF, Geneva, Switzerland. to Pentecostalism LWF The Lutheran World Federation – A Communion of Churches ISBN (Europe) 978-3-905676-68-6 DTS-Studies-201002-text.indd 10 02/03/2011 15:55:18 PM Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism edited by Karen L. Bloomquist on behalf of the Lutheran World Federation— A Communion of Churches Lutheran University Press Minneapolis, Minnesota Previous volumes in the Theology in the Life of the Church series Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Being the Church in the Midst of Empire. Trinitarian Reflections Simone Sinn (ed.), Deepening Faith, Hope and Love in Relations with Neighbors of Other Faiths Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.), Identity, Survival, Witness. Reconfiguring Theological Agendas Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism Theology in the Life of the Church, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Lutheranism from the Margins: Paul Peter Waldenström on Being a ‘Good Lutheran’ in America Mark Safstrom Augustana College, Rock Island Illinois
    Augustana College Augustana Digital Commons Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Scandinavian Studies Creative Works 2012 Defining Lutheranism from the Margins: Paul Peter Waldenström on Being a ‘Good Lutheran’ in America Mark Safstrom Augustana College, Rock Island Illinois Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/scanfaculty Part of the History of Christianity Commons, Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons, and the Scandinavian Studies Commons Augustana Digital Commons Citation Safstrom, Mark. "Defining Lutheranism from the Margins: Paul Peter Waldenström on Being a ‘Good Lutheran’ in America" (2012). Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Creative Works. https://digitalcommons.augustana.edu/scanfaculty/3 This Published Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Scandinavian Studies at Augustana Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scandinavian Studies: Faculty Scholarship & Creative Works by an authorized administrator of Augustana Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Defining Lutheranism from the Margins: Paul Peter Waldenström on Being a “Good Lutheran” in America MARK SAFSTROM he histories of church institutions may often be written by the orthodox “winners,” but dissenters, protestors, and even her Tetics undoubtedly play important roles in giving direction to the parent institution’s evolving identity. Such voices from the mar- gins often set the agenda at crucial moments, prompting both the dissenters and establishment to engage in a debate to define proper theology and practice. Once a dissenting group has formally sepa- rated from a parent body, there is a risk that teleological hindsight will obscure the nature of these conversations, including the reasons for the ultimate separation and the intentions of both the dissenters and the establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2020 €2.50 W Flowers for All Occasions W Individually W
    THE CHURCH OF IRELAND United Dioceses of Cork, Cloyne and Ross DIOCESAN MAGAZINE April 2020 €2.50 w flowers for all occasions w Individually w . e Designed Bouquets l e g a & Arrangements n c e f lo Callsave: ri st 1850 369369 s. co m The European Federation of Interior Landscape Groups •Fresh & w w Artificial Plant Displays w .f lo •Offices • Hotels ra ld •Restaurants • Showrooms e c o r lt •Maintenance Service d . c •Purchase or Rental terms o m Tel: (021) 429 2944 bringing interiors alive 16556 DOUGLAS ROAD, CORK United Dioceses of Cork, Cloyne and Ross DIOCESAN MAGAZINE April 2020 Volume XLV - No.4 The Bishop writes… Dear Friends, I am writing this to you on my 60th Birthday. I am beginning to feel that, having lived on three continents and seen much, I have seen a lot. Many of you in the Diocese have known me longer than I have known myself! But even those of you who are around longer haven’t seen it all, it would seem. When have we ever seen it all? Never. But we do learn lessons from the past in order to live now. We are truly living in strange and bewildering times. When I say that people have lived through such times before, in our communities locally, nationally, and worldwide, that is not in any way to diminish our own sense of anxiety and vulnerability at this time. Almost certainly by the time this issue of the Diocesan Magazine gets to you (however it does) things will have changed again; they are changing by the hour, yet alone the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Confession (Book of Concord, Pp. 476-80)
    May: [Note to the readers. With this installment, our series Learning Luther ceases for the summer months to resume in September. Church leaders! If you have enjoyed and profited from these studies, permit me to exhort you to share the experience in an age appropriate way by supporting our new program, TforTeens ("Theology for Teens") at Roanoke College this summer. Please identify those young people in your midst who would benefit from this week with Prof. Ned Wisnefske, Chaplain Chris Bowen, our Synod Youth Minister Dave Delaney and myself. We will be pouring over the story of Creation and Fall in Genesis 1-3 with help from Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Martin Luther. The cost is virtually free. Invest with us in cultivating future leaders of the church! -- Dr. Paul Hinlicky] Confession (Book of Concord, pp. 476-80) Introduction By Paul R. Hinlicky, Tise Professor of Lutheran Studies, Roanoke College & Docent, Evanjelicka Bohoslovecka Fakulta, Univerzita Komenskeho, Bratislava, Slovakia. Confession is not a sacrament as such but a sacramental practice that negotiates between baptism into Christ and reception of His supper. It consists in contrite confession of sin and pronunciation of divine forgiveness. It may be public and general, as is customary in many Lutheran churches. It may also be private and particular. The latter Luther not only allows but emphatically endorses, indeed, he exhorts Christians to it in this concluding part of his Large Catechism. As we heard last time, Luther refused to make a legalistic rule about frequency of communion, as had been done previously. Confession to the priest had been made a precondition to worthy reception; it was extorted with a checklist of prohibited thoughts, words and deeds.
    [Show full text]
  • Abuses Under Indictment at the Diet of Augsburg 1530 Jared Wicks, S.J
    ABUSES UNDER INDICTMENT AT THE DIET OF AUGSBURG 1530 JARED WICKS, S.J. Gregorian University, Rome HE MOST recent historical scholarship on the religious dimensions of Tthe Diet of Augsburg in 1530 has heightened our awareness and understanding of the momentous negotiations toward unity conducted at the Diet.1 Beginning August 16, 1530, Lutheran and Catholic represent­ atives worked energetically, and with some substantial successes, to overcome the divergence between the Augsburg Confession, which had been presented on June 25, and the Confutation which was read on behalf of Emperor Charles V on August 3. Negotiations on doctrine, especially on August 16-17, narrowed the differences on sin, justification, good works, and repentance, but from this point on the discussions became more difficult and an impasse was reached by August 21 which further exchanges only confirmed. The Emperor's draft recess of September 22 declared that the Lutheran confession had been refuted and that its signers had six months to consider acceptance of the articles proposed to them at the point of impasse in late August. Also, no further doctrinal innovations nor any more changes in religious practice were to be intro­ duced in their domains.2 When the adherents of the Reformation dis­ sented from this recess, it became unmistakably clear that the religious unity of the German Empire and of Western Christendom was on the way to dissolution. But why did it come to this? Why was Charles V so severely frustrated in realizing the aims set for the Diet in his conciliatory summons of January 21, 1530? The Diet was to be a forum for a respectful hearing of the views and positions of the estates and for considerations on those steps that would lead to agreement and unity in one church under Christ.3 1 The most recent stage of research began with Gerhard Müller, "Johann Eck und die Confessio Augustana/' Quellen und Forschungen aus italienischen Archiven und Biblio­ theken 38 (1958) 205-42, and continued in works by Eugène Honèe and Vinzenz Pfhür, with further contributions of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Pietism As an Ecclesiological Heresy
    Christos Yannaras Pietism as an Ecclesiological Heresy Chapter 8 of The Freedom of Morality (St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, Crestwood, NY: 1984), pp. 119-136. 1. The historical coordinates We give the name “pietism” to a phenomenon in church life which certainly has a particular historical and “confessional” starting point, but also has much wider ramifications in the spiritual life of all the Christian Churches. Pietism made its appearance as a distinct historical movement within Protestantism, at the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth centuries, around 1690-1730.1 Its aim was to stress “practical piety,” as distinct from the polemical dogmatic theology to which the Reformation had initially given a certain priority.2 Against the intellectualist 120 1 There is a rich bibliography on pietism, chiefly in the form of monographs dealing with the numerous local pietistic movements and the personalities of their leaders. Although not very systematic, the fullest study of the phenomenon as a whole is still A. Ritschl’s three-volume work Geschichte des Pietismus (Bonn, 1880-1886). A recent work, exceptionally informative and well-documented, is Martin Schmidt’s Pietismus (1972). The Roman Catholic approach, with a concise, objective and reasonably full description of the phenomenon and history of pietism, may be found in Louis Bouyer, Orthodox Spirituality and Protestant and Anglican Spirituality (History of Christian Spirituality 111, London, 1969), p. 169ff. As for the rest of the bibliography, we note here some basic aids: W. Mahrholz, Der deutsche Pietismus (Berlin, 1921); H. Bornkamm, Mystik, Spiritualismus und die Anfänge des Pietismus im Luthertum (Giessen, 1926); M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Folk Churches in Finland
    The Two Folk Churches in Finland The 12th Finnish Lutheran-Orthodox Theological Discussions 2014 Publications of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland 29 The Church and Action The Two Folk Churches in Finland The 12th Finnish Lutheran-Orthodox Theological Discussions 2014 Publications of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland 29 The Church and Action National Church Council Department for International Relations Helsinki 2015 The Two Folk Churches in Finland The 12th Finnish Lutheran-Orthodox Theological Discussions 2014 © National Church Council Department for International Relations Publications of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland 29 The Church and Action Documents exchanged between the churches (consultations and reports) Tasknumber: 2015-00362 Editor: Tomi Karttunen Translator: Rupert Moreton Book design: Unigrafia/ Hanna Sario Layout: Emma Martikainen Photos: Kirkon kuvapankki/Arto Takala, Heikki Jääskeläinen, Emma Martikainen ISBN 978-951-789-506-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-951-789-507-1 (PDF) ISSN 2341-9393 (Print) ISSN 2341-9407 (Online) Unigrafia Helsinki 2015 CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................................................................... 5 THE TWELFTH THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS BETWEEN THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF FINLAND AND THE ORTHODOX CHURCH OF FINLAND, 2014 Communiqué. ............................................................................................. 9 A Theological and Practical Overview of the Folk Church, opening speech Bishop Arseni ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Depictions of Laestadianism 1850–1950
    ROALD E. KRISTIANSEN Depictions of Laestadianism 1850–1950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.87789 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) he issue to be discussed here is how soci- country. Until 1905, Norway was united ety’s views of the Laestadian revival has with Sweden, and so what happened in changed over the course of the revival T Sweden was also important for Norway. movement’s first 100 years. The article claims that society’s emerging view of the revival is This was even the case for a fairly long time characterized by two different positions. The first after 1905, especially with regard to a reli­ period is typical of the last part of the nineteenth gious movement that united people from century and is characterized by the fact that three Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland the evaluation of the revival took as its point of departure the instigator of the revival, Lars Levi and Norway). Laestadius (1800–61). The characteristic of Laes- The Laestadian revival originated in tadius himself would, it was thought, be char- northern Sweden during the late 1840s, acteristic of the movement he had instigated. and was led by the parish minister of Kare­ During this first period, the revival was sharply criticized. This negative attitude gradually suando, Lars Levi Læstadius (1800–61). changed from the turn of the century onwards. Within a few years, the revival spread The second period is characterized by greater to the neighbouring countries Finland openness towards understanding the revival on and Norway. In Norway, most parishes its own premises.
    [Show full text]
  • The Works of Gabriel Harvey. for the First Time Collected and Edited, with Memorial-Introduction, Notes and Illustrations, Etc
    nnnrff^^^fff'^'^rrfnr^ THE HUTH LIBRARY. THE WORKS OK GABRIEL HARVEY, D.C.L VOL. I. MEMORIAL-INTRODUCTION. LETTERS TO AND FROM EDMUND SPENSER. LETTERS FROM LETTER-BOOK. FOVRE LETTERS AND CERTAINE SONNETS, ETC., ETC. A LETTER OF NOTABLE CONTENTS, ETC. 1579— 1593. ^><^v^<^v^«^y^<.?'<? <o <^ ^ ^ ^. v^ v^ <^v^v§N^>^>^>^^ Contempt deposeth kings as well as death. Mustapha, iv. 3. o'.'A;..r^- /^>A»ix ^--t:>v. ,'o!^. ELIZABETHAN- JACOBEAN JB (D) ©i ^ Verse and Prose LAR G E LY Fro7?v ike Zidro.yy of BY THE FOR PRIVATE CIRCULAT-ON ONLY Cfje IE)utf) Lidtari), THE WORKS GABRIEL HARVEY, D.C.L. IN THREE VOLUMES. FOR THE FIRST TIME COLLECTED AND EDITED, WITH MEMORtAL-INTRODUCTION, NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS, ETC. BY THE REV. ALEXANDER B. GROSART, LL.D. (Edin.), F.S.A. (Scot.), St. George's, Blackburn, LMttcashire. VOL. I. MEMORIAL-INTRODUCTION. LETTERS TO AND FROM EDMUND SPENSER. LETTERS EROM LETTER-BOOK. FOVRE LETTERS AND CERTAINE SONNETS, ETC., ETC. A LETTER OF NOTABLE CONTENTS, ETC. 1579—1593- PRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION ONLY. 1884. 50 Copies, 7^^Q>o Ptinted by llazell, Waiion, atid I'mey, I.iiuiUd, Loudon and Ayle^l iiry. Co PROFESSOR DAVID MASSON, EDINBURGH, I Dedicate these "CURIOSITIES OF LITERATURE"— THE WORKS Ot GABRIEL HARVEY. WITH HIGHEST REGARD AND GRATITUDE FOR HIS ABUNDANT SERVICES TO LITERATURE, ORIGINAL AND EDITORIAL. Alexander B. Grosart. CONTENTS. PACiB Dedication to Professor David Masson . v Memorial-Introduction ix Letters between Edmund Spenser and Harvey i From Letter-Book of Gabriel Harvey . 109 FovRE Letters and Certaine Sonnets . .151 A New Letter of Notable Contents .
    [Show full text]
  • [Formula of Concord]
    [Formula of Concord] Editors‘ Introduction to the Formula of Concord Every movement has a period in which its adherents attempt to sort out and organize the fundamental principles on which the founder or founders of the movement had based its new paradigm and proposal for public life. This was true of the Lutheran Reformation. In the late 1520s one of Luther‘s early students, John Agricola, challenged first the conception of God‘s law expressed by Luther‘s close associate and colleague, Philip Melanchthon, and, a decade later, Luther‘s own doctrine of the law. This began the disputes over the proper interpretation of Luther‘s doctrinal legacy. In the 1530s and 1540s Melanchthon and a former Wittenberg colleague, Nicholas von Amsdorf, privately disagreed on the role of good works in salvation, the bondage or freedom of the human will in relationship to God‘s grace, the relationship of the Lutheran reform to the papacy, its relationship to government, and the real presence of Christ‘s body and blood in the Lord‘s Supper. The contention between the two foreshadowed a series of disputes that divided the followers of Luther and Melanchthon in the period after Luther‘s death, in which political developments in the empire fashioned an arena for these disputes. In the months after Luther‘s death on 18 February 1546, Emperor Charles V finally was able to marshal forces to attempt the imposition of his will on his defiant Lutheran subjects and to execute the Edict of Worms of 1521, which had outlawed Luther and his followers.
    [Show full text]