Bunjil Rocks Bioblitz Results
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Management Plan Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park 2006
Department for Environment and Heritage Management Plan Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park 2006 www.environment.sa.gov.au This plan of management was adopted on 11 January 2006 and was prepared in pursuance of section 38 of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Government of South Australia Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, Australia © Department for Environment and Heritage, 2006 ISBN: 1 921018 887 Front cover photograph courtesy of Bernd Stoecker FRPS and reproduced with his permission This document may be cited as “Department for Environment and Heritage (2006) Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park Management Plan, Adelaide, South Australia” FOREWORD Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park is located approximately 80 kilometres north-east of Adelaide and approximately 12 kilometres south-east of Tanunda, in the northern Mount Lofty Ranges. The 392 hectare park was proclaimed in 1979 to conserve a remnant block of native vegetation, in particular the northern-most population of Brown Stringybark (Eucalyptus baxteri). Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park preserves a substantial number of habitats for native fauna and helps to protect the soil and watershed of Tanunda Creek. More than 360 species of native plant are found within the reserve, many of which are of conservation significance. Bird species of conservation significance recorded within the reserve include the Diamond Firetail, White-browed Treecreeper, Elegant Parrot and Crescent Honeyeater. Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park also has a rich cultural heritage. The reserve is of significance to the Peramangk people and Ngadjuri people who have traditional associations with the land. Kaiserstuhl Conservation Park has also been a valuable source of material for botanical research. Dr Ferdinand von Mueller and Dr Hans Herman Behr collected Barossa Ranges plants from the area between 1844 and 1851. -
Verslag Van Een KNNV-Reis Door ZW-Australië Van 19 September Tot 19 Oktober 2011; Deelverslag Van Het Plantenprogramma
Verslag plantenprogramma KNNV-reis ZW-Australië, 2011 Verslag van KNNV-reis naar ZW-Australië, sept/okt. 2011 Deel: Plantenprogramma 1 Verslag plantenprogramma KNNV-reis ZW-Australië, 2011 Colofon Het rapport “Verslag van KNNV-reis naar ZW-Australië, Bij dit verslag behoren 2 CD-roms met foto‟s van de sept/okt. 2011; deel: plantenprogramma” is door Ad. waargenomen soorten planten. Het copy right op deze Littel in eigen beheer uitgegeven in febr. 2012 te CD‟s berust bij André Beijersbergen te Nijmegen. Ze Leiden (NL). Aan dit rapport is door bijna alle zijn bij hem te koop voor €10,- (excl. verzendkosten); deelnemers aan het plantenprogramma een bijdrage e-mail: [email protected]. geleverd; dit is bij desbetreffende delen aangegeven. Het rapport in zijn geheel is samengesteld en geredigeerd met wisselende intensiteit door Ad. Littel. Het rapport is als PDF-bestand aan te vragen bij Ad. Littel, e-mail: [email protected]. Op de foto’s op deze bladzijde ziet u alle deelnemers aan deze reis afgebeeld. 1 Verslag plantenprogramma KNNV-reis ZW-Australië, 2011 Verslag van een KNNV-reis door ZW-Australië van 19 september tot 19 oktober 2011; deelverslag van het plantenprogramma Algemene inleiding De Algemene ReisCommissie van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische Vereniging (ARC-KNNV) organiseerde en begeleidde in september en oktober van 2011 een natuurreis door het zuidwestelijke deel van de Australische staat Western Australia (in dit verslag gemakshalve meestal ZW-Australië genoemd). Deze reis bood zowel een vogelprogramma en een plantenprogramma aan, waarbij verschil- lende reisroutes werden gevolgd, aangezien de voor Australië kenmerkende vogels en planten zich in deels verschillende typen natuurterreinen ophouden. -
Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, Volume 59, Number 3, Pp
Integrative and Comparative Biology Integrative and Comparative Biology, volume 59, number 3, pp. 517–534 doi:10.1093/icb/icz089 Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology SYMPOSIUM The Evolution of CAM Photosynthesis in Australian Calandrinia Reveals Lability in C3þCAM Phenotypes and a Possible Constraint Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icb/article-abstract/59/3/517/5510550 by Yale University user on 17 January 2020 to the Evolution of Strong CAM Lillian P. Hancock,1,*,† Joseph A. M. Holtum† and Erika J. Edwards*,‡ *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University, Box G-W, Providence, RI 02912, USA; †Terrestrial Ecosystems and Climate Change, College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811, Queensland, Australia; ‡Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT PO Box 208105, 06520, USA From the symposium “Integrative Plant Biology” presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, January 3–7, 2019 at Tampa, Florida. 1E-mail: [email protected] Synopsis Australian Calandrinia has radiated across the Australian continent during the last 30 Ma, and today inhabits most Australian ecosystems. Given its biogeographic range and reports of facultative Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) photosynthesis in multiple species, we hypothesized (1) that CAM would be widespread across Australian Calandrinia and that species, especially those that live in arid regions, would engage in strong CAM, and (2) that Australian Calandrinia would be an important lineage for informing on the CAM evolutionary trajectory. We cultivated 22 Australian Calandrinia species for a drought experiment. Using physiological measurements and d13C values we characterized photosynthetic mode across these species, mapped the resulting character states onto a phylogeny, and characterized the climatic envelopes of species in their native ranges. -
Alinytjara Wilurara, South Australia
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Hershkovitz: Rumicastrum Corrections 1
Hershkovitz: Rumicastrum corrections 1 Corrections to Phytologia,vol. 102 (3) – Rumicastrum dielsii (Poelln.) Carolin is an “alien,” R. cylindricum (Poelln.) Carolin is Elatinaceae, R. monogynum (Poelln.) Carolin is incertae sedis, and the combination in Rumicastrum for Talinum nanum Nees was neglected Mark A. Hershkovitz Santiago, Chile [email protected] ABSTRACT: In Phytologia 102 (4): 116–123, Hershkovitz recombined into Rumicastrum Ulbrich 65 Australian Montiaceae species originally classified in Calandrinia Kunth. Three of these species, all described by Karl von Poellnitz, do not pertain to Rumicastrum. The type specimen of Rumicastrum dielsii (Poelln.) Carolin is Calandrinia menziesii (Hook.) Torr. & A.Gray, a western North American species naturalized in Australia. The type specimen of Rumicastrum cylindricum (Poelln.) Carolin appears to be Bergia L. (Elatinaceae), but the species is not determined here. The type specimen of Rumicastrum monogynum (Poelln.) Carolin has not been located and may have been destroyed. The protolog is incomplete, but the specified characteristics suggest that it does not pertain to Montiaceae. Its identity is not determined here. In addition to the above, Hershkovitz listed Calandrinia pusilla Lindl., nom illegit., as a nomenclatural rather than taxonomic synonym of Rumicastrum eremaeum (Ewart) Carolin. Although homotypic, it is a taxonomic synonym. The status of other possible taxonomic synonyms combined into Rumicastrum also is discussed. Finally, Hershkovitz ascribed authorship of several Rumicastrum combinations to Roger Carolin. The question as to whether authorship should be ascribed as “Carolin ex Hershk.” is here addressed. KEY WORDS: Rumicastrum, Calandrinia, Parakeelya, Montiaceae, Elatinaceae, Australia. CITATION: Hershkovitz, M. 2021. Corrections to Phytologia,vol. 102 (3) – Rumicastrum dielsii (Poelln.) Carolin is an “alien,” R. -
Calandrinia Granulifera Benth., Fl
CalandriniaListing statement for Calandrinia granulifer granulifera (pygmy purslanea) pygmy purslane T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S N O T E S H E E T Image by Tim Rudman Scientific name: Calandrinia granulifera Benth., Fl. Austral. 1: 176 (1863 Common name: pygmy purslane (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Portulacaeae Name history: Calandrinia neesiana Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: rare Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Distribution: Endemic status: not endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North Figure 1. Distribution of Calandrinia granulifera in Plate 1. Calandrinia granulifera: habit Tasmania, showing NRM regions (image by Richard Schahinger) Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Listing statement for Calandrinia granulifera (pygmy purslane) SUMMARY: Calandrinia granulifera (small obovoid to almost globular, the largest up to 10 purslane) is a small succulent annual herb that mm long and 5 mm wide. Flowers up to 10 per occurs on a variety of substrates in Tasmania, branch; pedicels 1 to 2 mm long, stout, erect in mostly in near-coastal areas in the northeast, fruit. Sepals 2, broad-ovate to orbicular, very with an outlying occurrence in the Northern thick, usually 1.5 to 3 mm long, not persistent Midlands. Available information suggests that in fruit. Petals 5 to 7, free, pink fading to white, subpopulations are small and relatively 2.5 to 4 mm long, broad-oblong to localised; the total population is estimated to be oblanceolate (to lanceolate to elliptic). -
Adec Preview Generated PDF File
Records or the Western Australian Musellm Supplement No. 61: 77-154 (2000). Flora and vegetation of the southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia G.J. Keighery, N. Gibson, M.N. Lyons and Allan H. Burbidge Department of Conservation and Land Management, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6065, Australia Abstract This paper reports the first detailed study of the vascular flora of 2 the southern Carnarvon Basin, an area of c. 75000 km • A total flora of 2133 taxa of vascular plants was listed for the area. There are eight major conservation reserves which have 1559 taxa present in them. Most of the 574 unreserved taxa are wetland taxa, taxa of tropical affinities or those only present on the Acacia shrublands of the central basin. Vegetation patterning at a regional scale showed the major floristic boundary in the south west of the study area, which in turn reflected the major climatic gradients of the area. The other major influence on vegetation patterning was soil type. INTRODUCTION temperate - arid change-over zone (Gibson, Despite Shark Bay being the site of very early Burbidge, Keighery and Lyons, 2000). visitation and study by several European expeditions (Beard, 1990; Keighery, 1990; George, 1999) the area was until recently still poorly known METHODS botanically. Beard (1975, 1976a) prepared structural vegetation maps for the whole area at a 1: 1 000000 Study area scale and Payne et al. (1987) have undertaken land The study area covered by the flora survey system maps (rangeland mapping) for the whole extended from 23°30'S to 28°00'S and from Dirk area at a 1: 250000 scale. -
Rumicastrum Ulbrich (Montiaceae): a Beautiful Name for the Australian Calandrinias
116 Phytologia (Sep 21, 2020) 102(3) Rumicastrum Ulbrich (Montiaceae): a beautiful name for the Australian calandrinias Mark A. Hershkovitz Santiago, Chile [email protected] ABSTRACT: For more than 30 years, Montiaceae specialists have agreed that Australian species classified in Calandrinia Kunth pertain to a distinct and divergent lineage whose oldest validly published name is Rumicastrum Ulbrich. In 1998, more than half of accepted species were transferred erroneously to a new genus, Parakeelya Hershk. However, taxonomists and databases have continued to classify the species in Calandrinia, confounding the taxonomy of the latter. Here, 65 Australian species classified in Calandrinia are transferred to Rumicastrum. This consummates the phylogenetic revision of Montiaceae taxonomy initiated more 30 years ago. Published on-line www.phytologia.org Published on-line www.phytologia.org Phytologia 102(3): 116-123 (Sept 21, 2020). ISSN 030319430. KEY WORDS: Rumicastrum, Calandrinia, Parakeelya, Montiaceae, Australia. Carolin (1987) published a seminal analysis of classical Portulacaceae (including Montiaceae) that found, among other things, polyphyly of the classical circumscription of the genus Calandrinia Kunth, which then included ca.120 accepted species. He determined that the 30–35 accepted Australian species then classified in Calandrinia represented a lineage distinct and divergent from other members of Calandrinia s. lato. He also determined that the monotypic Australian genus Rumicastrum Ulbrich [TYPE: R. chamaecladum (Diels) Ulbrich]), originally classified in Chenopodiaceae, pertained to this lineage. He prepared but did not publish a manuscript that recombined all named Australian calandrinias in Rumicastrum. Hershkovitz (1993) substantially revised Carolin’s (1987) analysis and established the current circumscription of Calandrinia (see Hershkovitz, 2019), comprising then only ca. -
SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa
SWAFR - IBRA - Native Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 3/11/2015 3:49:33 PM This analysis uses a pro tem definition of the SWAFR that served to define the study area. It was based on the collection of IBRA bioregions most closely approximating the original definition of the Southwest Province by Beard (1980). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2015) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. Native vascular taxa with current names Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFIBR with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_NATIVE. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - IBRA 29,851,921.5 Species List By Region 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 35 12247 Acacia anthochaera SWAFR - IBRA 36 3220 Acacia aphylla T Y 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 37 15466 Acacia applanata 2 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 38 14049 Acacia aprica T Y Y 3 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 39 37260 Acacia aptaneura Mitchell PRP 1266) 40 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y 4 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 41 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 5 16159 Acacia acanthoclada subsp. -
Biodiversity Summary: Kangaroo Island, South Australia
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Biodiversity Summary: Swan, Western Australia
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Species List
SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) - All Vascular Plant Taxa Paul Gioia, Science and Conservation Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife Report generated on 22/06/2016 11:17:17 AM This analysis uses the SWAFR boundary generated from a site classification analysis by Hopper & Gioia (2004). Data for this report were derived from a snapshot taken from WAHERB on 18/05/2015 for Gioia & Hopper (2016) paper. Criteria for data extraction and analysis were: 1. All vascular plants 2. Species-rank names where the typical subspecies also existed were renamed to the typical subspecies to avoid counting duplicate taxa 3. All vascular plant taxa with current names, including weeds Note: 1. This report contains information generated from intersecting the supplied polygon layer LOCAL_SWFHG04 with the point species occurrence layer WAHERB_FILT_ALL. 2. Endemism is calculated based on the records available to this analysis and is not necessarily authoritative. Regions reported on: Region Name Hectares SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 29,954,654.4 1 2 3 1 2 3 NameID Species Cons End WA NameID Species Cons End WA 39 14049 Acacia aprica T Y Y SWAFR - Hopper & Gioia (2004) 40 37260 Acacia aptaneura 1 4889 Abutilon cryptopetalum 41 14050 Acacia arcuatilis P2 Y Y 2 19708 *Abutilon grandifolium Y 42 3221 Acacia argutifolia P4 Y 3 4902 Abutilon oxycarpum 43 14051 Acacia aristulata T Y Y 4 43020 Abutilon oxycarpum subsp. Prostrate (A.A. Y 44 12248 Acacia ascendens P2 Y Mitchell PRP 1266) 45 14052 Acacia asepala P2 Y 5 4903 *Abutilon theophrasti Y 46 3225 Acacia ashbyae 6 16106 Acacia acanthaster Y 47 15467 Acacia assimilis subsp.