DOCSLIB.ORG

Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 01.- 15. April Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches Atomprogramm ....................................................................................... 1 2. Tragödie von Yarmouk ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Koalitionsverhandlungen und Perspektiven für eine Einheitsregierung ........................................................... 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches ously damage Iran's nuclear facilities. The alterna- Atomprogramm tive is living (or dying) with a nuclear weapons- Das Anfang April erreichte Rahmenabkommen der capable fanatical, tyrannical, aggressive regime fünf UN-Vetomächte und Deutschlands mit der irani- much more dangerous for the rest of the world than schen Regierung stieß in Jerusalem auf scharfe North Korea will ever be. Too bad the meetings Kritik. Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanyahu warnte weren't held in the holy city of Qom. In that case the in einem Telefonat mit US-Präsident Barack Obama comparison with the betrayal of Czechoslovakia by vor einer existentiellen Gefahr für Israel. Die Eck- the British and French in 1938 would have been punkte, die bis zum Sommer in einen Vertrag mün- even more perfect. That famous meeting, leading to den sollen, halten u.a. fest, dass Iran in den kom- an "historic" agreement, was of course, held in Mu- menden zehn Jahren in etwa zwei Drittel der Zentri- nich, birthplace of the Nazi Party. fugen zur Urananreicherungen still legt. Die Atoman- Norman Bailey, GLO, 06.04.15 lagen sollen außerdem für Kontrollen der Internatio- nalen Atomenergiebehörde (IAEA) zugängig sein. In Israel will benefit from an Iran nuclear deal Israel bleibt man jedoch weiterhin besorgt. (…) we should take a breath and try to understand what each side is trying to achieve (…) The real goal The "historic" agreement that ignores history of the world powers is to keep Iran in this situation, (…) In 1994 President Clinton made a television or return it to a situation in which it cannot produce address from the White House remarkably similar in enough fissile material for the core of a nuclear wording to that of Mr. Obama following the Lau- weapon for more than 10 years. No fissile material, sanne meetings. (…) It celebrated an "agreement" no bomb. (…) The West is hoping that within the reached with North Korea to end that country's nu- next 10-15 years, the ayatollahs will fall or be over- clear weapons program. Subsequently North Korea thrown, or become more open and less militant. (…) violated every aspect of that agreement with impuni- Iran is primarily interested in the removal of sanc- ty, and is now a nuclear power. The same will hap- tions (…) and (…) to protect the honor and prestige pen again with Iran unless (1) sanctions are main- of the regime. (…) Israel's aim is to completely pre- tained and strengthened leading to regime change vent – in the present and in the future - the possibil- in Iran or (2) military force is used to destroy or seri- ity of Iran developing and producing nuclear weap- 1 ons (…) by preventing Iran from acquiring fissile at a single site, the Natanz facility, making inspec- material (…). one must consider the prospect that tions easier. The level of enrichment will be kept to something will go wrong, leading to an escalation in 3.67 percent, vastly below weapons-grade. And the the political conflict and the ongoing development of stockpile of low-grade uranium would be capped at Iran's nuclear program. (…) For now, the military 300 kilograms for 15 years. (…) The agreement sets option does not seem to be on the table (…). If an up an aggressive inspection regime. (…) Yet, (…) agreement is reached within the next three months, there are also quite worrisome aspects to the Israel would benefit as Iran be out of the nuclear framework agreement (…). Iran’s nuclear infrastruc- bomb business for at least ten years – which could ture will remain intact, though some of it may be well be the same result as attacking Iran's nuclear mothballed for 10 years. (…) Another problem is that facilities. It is always better to achieve through di- Iran will be allowed to engage in “limited research plomacy what could also be achieved with military and development with its advanced centrifuges” at measures. Natanz (…). Not only is no mention made of Iran’s Ron Ben-Yishai, JED, 01.04.15 development of long-range missiles that could only be used to carry nuclear warheads, the key parame- The unfolding farce of Obama’s deal with Iran ters are silent on Iran’s support for terrorism, not just (…) President Barack Obama and his indefatigable in the Middle East but in far-flung locations such as secretary of state promised that they (…) would not Buenos Aires and Burgas. Indeed, while talks pro- sign a bad deal with Iran on its nuclear weapons gressed between Iran and the P5+1 (the US, Britain, program. (...) But the deal is far worse than even our France, China and Russia plus Germany), Reza relentlessly lowered expectations had given us rea- Naqdi, the commander of the Basij militia of the son to anticipate. The Arak heavy water plant is not Revolutionary Guards, declared that “erasing Israel to be dismantled. (…) The Fordo enrichment facility, from the map” is “nonnegotiable.” (…) The skeptics built secretly into a mountain, is not to be shuttered. have every reason to remain skeptical. (…) Thousands of centrifuges are to be allowed to Editorial, JPO, 06.04.15 keep on spinning. Thousands more will remain intact. For heaven’s sake, why? Because this was the best There is no 'better deal' with Iran deal we could get. (…) If it were not so grave it (…) The deal is basically dangerous in nature, and would be farcical to witness the disingenuous at- needs to be rejected outright. (…) Even in the ab- tempts by the Obama administration to depict the sence of a signed full agreement, the U.S. and its unfolding disaster as an achievement worthy of ad- negotiating partners already have awarded legitima- miration — the best deal; historic; a guarantee, in cy to Iran’s nuclear threshold status. (…) Iran is get- the glib, empty formulation of presidential adviser ting more or less what it wanted: the capability to Ben Rhodes, that Iran will never get the bomb. (…) produce enriched uranium and to research weapon It gets worse. The Iranians’ latest contention is that design; agreement to keep its missile program intact; the deal gives them the right to start injecting gas and no linkages to Iranian behavior in the region. into their most sophisticated centrifuges — the IR-8s The deal is a prelude to nuclear breakout and Irani- — which they say can enrich uranium 20 times fast- an regional hegemony. (…) Unfortunately, no better er than their current IR-1s. And therefore, that smil- deal is in the offing. (…) Obama is right that the only ing, avuncular Foreign Minister Zarif and his nuclear alternative to this deal is an Iranian nuclear fait ac- expert colleague Ali Akbar Salehi told Iranian MPs compli or the bombing of the Iranian nuclear infra- on Tuesday, Iran will begin working with the IR-8s on structure. Obama’s penchant for engagement, his the first day that the deal goes into effect. (…) Need- reluctance to use force, and his liberal prism on in- less to say, that makes a mockery of the entire deal. ternational relations (…) has led to this miserable (...) result. Netanyahu is wrong in demanding a better David Horovitz, TOI, 08.04.15 deal because no such deal exists. Yet denying its ratification by the U.S. Congress could create better The Iran deal international circumstances for an Israeli military (…) Iran will be allowed to keep in operation just strike. (…) It is more evident than ever that only mili- 5,060 centrifuges, fewer than leaked estimates of tary action can stop a determined state such as the 6,000 or 7,000 or 12,000. And only Iran’s most basic Islamic Republic of Iran from building a nuclear model – the IR-1 centrifuges – will be in operation. bomb. (…) (…) Also, all enrichment activity will be concentrated Efraim Inbar, IHY, 09.04.15 2 Deal makes Iran stronger than ever after the establishment of Israel in 1948, and many (…) The memorandum of understanding shows that were refugees at least twice before settling there. the Iranians got their way on most of the issues. (…) (…) They remained Palestinian in their identity, and The importance of the results of the talks is that Iran part of the larger family of displaced Palestinians (…) will be recognized as a country on the brink of nu- most of the Palestinians in Syria did not take sides; clear capability. (…) Iran demanded that the deal be nonetheless the Assad regime decided that they limited to a few years, after which the limitations on were the enemy. (…) Now the Yarmouk camp has its nuclear program would be removed and it would been brutally attacked by Islamic State (IS), who are be allowed to do what it wants. (…) Iran has come fighting against Assad and his Iranian-backed Hez- out of the deal in a new position. The sanctions bollah allies. The Palestinians are being bombed against it will be removed and governments and and killed by both sides (…). There are daily reports private companies will rush to do business with it. Its of massacres and rapes inside of Yarmouk. This is a regional status will be bolstered when its involve- humanitarian crisis that almost no one in the world ment in neighboring countries -- Iraq, Syria, Leba- cares about. (…) This is (…) is the time to save hu- non, Yemen, and the Gaza Strip -- is already un- man lives. (…) It is the humane gesture that we precedented. Iran becoming a state on the verge of Jews should understand the need for, recalling with nuclear capability could prompt other countries to empathy when we had no place to run to and no follow suit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, November 4 Headlines: Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria EU Declares Israel Boycott Protected as Free Speech Pro-Israel Alliance Prepares for 2017 Anti-Israel Campaign Lieberman Appoints new IDF deputy, Air Force Commander IDF Prevented US Diplomats from Visiting Jordan V. Pal. Israeli Exit Poll: Trump 49%, Clinton 44% David Duke: Jews Dominate Media, International Banking Report: Israel's UN Ambassador Made Secret Visit to Dubai Commentary: Yedioth Ahronoth: “Rabin, The Leader Who Taught Me Everything” By Moshe (Bogie) Yaalon, former IDF chief of staff and Minister of Defense Al Monitor: “Can battle over public broadcasting bring down Netanyahu?” By Ben Caspit, Senior Columnist at Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts November 4, 2016 Ynet News Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria Iran now commands a force of around 25,000 Shi'ite Muslim militants in Syria, mostly made up of recruits from Afghanistan and Pakistan, the former head of Israel's domestic intelligence agency has told a visiting Swiss delegation. Avi Dichter, chair of Israel's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, told members of the Swiss parliament the Iranian-backed force was focused on fighting Sunni rebels opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, not ISIS. "This is a foreign legion of some 25,000 militants, most of whom have come from Afghanistan and Pakistan," Dichter told the delegation, according to details provided by his office.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Haaretz20170122 Annexing Settlements Like Thieves in the Night Haaretz Editorial
    Haaretz20170122 Annexing settlements like thieves in the night Haaretz Editorial In bid to push annexation, Israeli government tries to give Trump crash course in Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is doubtful whether U.S. President Donald Trump knows exactly where Ma’aleh Adumim is, or whether the term E-1 – the area that was annexed to the Ma’aleh Adumim municipality – brings back childhood memories. But this won’t last for long. It seems the Israeli government has decided to give Trump a crash course in understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and, mainly, to give him a loyalty test without any preparation. Only two days after Trump’s swearing-in, the Ministerial Committee for Legislation is scheduled to discuss Sunday the annexation of the West Bank settlement to the State of Israel, in order to quickly prepare a 1 draft of the bill to be presented to the Knesset for approval. The conventional wisdom is that from the moment Trump was elected president, Israel received a stamp of approval to carry out any scheme it could think of in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. >> Citing pressure from Trump, Netanyahu tries to torpedo legislation to annex West Bank settlement << Based on this logic, there is actually no need to put Trump to the test, and no need to rush as if this were a window of opportunity that might close at any second. But as everyone knows, gangs of thieves are never confident that the policeman they bribed will not turn against them at the last minute. Hence the urgency to grab Ma’aleh Adumim and annex it to Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • How Palestinians Can Burst Israel's Political Bubble
    Al-Shabaka Policy Brief Policy Al-Shabaka March 2018 WHEN LEFT IS RIGHT: HOW PALESTINIANS CAN BURST ISRAEL’S POLITICAL BUBBLE By Amjad Iraqi Overview the allies holding up his fragile rule, from the ultra- orthodox Jewish parties to his personal rivals within Although no indictments have been issued yet, Israelis Likud. “King Bibi,” however, survived them all. A are speculating whether the latest developments in skilled politician, he has been adept at managing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption Israel’s notoriously volatile coalition system, and [email protected] scandals finally mark the beginning of his political has remained in power with three consecutive demise. The second-longest serving prime minister governments over nine years – each more right wing after David Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu has had a than the last.2 profound impact on Israel’s political scene since the 1990s. It is therefore troubling, especially to Netanyahu directly influenced the country’s media Palestinians, that if these corruption cases are the landscape by shaping the editorial stance of Israel harbinger of Netanyahu’s downfall, they will have Hayom (the nation’s gratis, most-read newspaper, had nothing to do with the more egregious crimes for funded by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson), which he is responsible, and for which he – and future and used the Communications Ministry to threaten Israeli leaders – have yet to be held accountable. and harass media outlets that were critical of him. Despite crises and condemnations throughout This policy brief analyzes Israel’s political his career – including mass Israeli protests for transformations under Netanyahu and maps out the socioeconomic justice in 2011 and, more recently, current leadership contenders from a Palestinian weekly protests against widespread government perspective.1 It argues that Israel’s insular political corruption – Netanyahu withstood public pressures discourse, and the increasing alignment of Israeli to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back
    Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute proposes policy recommendations and reforms for government and public administration agencies. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information, and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The IDI Press produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy papers, the Caesarea Forum Series, periodicals, and conference proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Neophyte Politicos, Tried Businessmen by SHLOMO MAITAL
    Neophyte politicos, tried businessmen By SHLOMO MAITAL 01/10/2013 10:25 Some fresh faces may help revitalize a Knesset that has lost respect and trust among ordinary Israelis. Photo by: Lahav Harkov The 19th Knesset will feature some fresh new faces among its 120 members, hopefully bringing new ideas on economics, business and entrepreneurship. They include Erel Margalit, a venture capitalist; Jacob Perry, veteran manager and business leader; Yair Shamir, entrepreneur, venture capitalist and until recently chair of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI); and Naftali Bennett, entrepreneur and now leader of the Bayit Yehudi party, the successor to the National Religious Party. All are relative neophytes in politics. In a political system that is more geriatric than creative, they bring welcome relief. Elections were called for January rather than October because of the inability of the coalition government to agree on a new budget. With the economy slowing, and the budget deficit growing, it was clear there was need for a painful NIS 15-20 billion ($4-$5.3 billion) budget cut. Yet the coalition parties could not agree on whose ox should be gored. They preferred to sweep the mess under the carpet and deal with it only after the election. According to the Bank of Israel, 2012 GDP growth was 3.3 percent. For 2013, the forecast calls for 3.8 percent growth. This is significantly higher than forecasted growth of the US or Europe. But the optimism stems in part from natural gas from the Tamar field, which when it comes on stream will contribute a full percentage point, or one-fourth, to total GDP growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Pre-Election Thoughts from Israel
    Some Pre-Election Thoughts from Israel I’m writing this in a Jerusalem café two and a half days before the polls open here for what all expect to be a truly fateful election. As an American who once expected to live here permanently, I have dual citizenship and, since Israel does not allow absentee voting except for diplomats, I came here to vote – and see old friends, of course. I’m glad I did, whatever the outcome. My friends generally share my views, so they are mostly voting for the left- Zionist Meretz, the center-left ‘Zionist Union’ (led by Yitzhak Herzog and Tzipi Livni), and a few for the ‘Joint List’, the uneasy amalgamation of ‘Arab parties’ and ‘Communists’ that was forced into existence by the new 3.25% vote threshold for getting into the Knesset. I put the party names in quotes since all these names and expressions are common usages but don’t necessarily represent what the words seem to mean. My most pleasant surprise is the sense of very cautious optimism which has greeted me. While no one can predict with any confidence a true change in Israel’s current trajectory, the chance of Bibi Netanyahu losing the election seems greater than most of us dared imagine a few weeks ago. Instead of the prime minister being the poster child and main attraction of his party, he now seems to have turned into its albatross. Not only for the ‘leftists,’ who are his natural enemies, but there seems an immense weariness and irritation with Bibi as a person, his family, and his style, as well as his policies, domestic and foreign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Premier Who Cried Gevalt: Why Netanyahu Lost His Majority by David Makovsky
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3184 The Premier Who Cried Gevalt: Why Netanyahu Lost His Majority by David Makovsky Sep 19, 2019 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Brief Analysis Whether due to institutional concerns, failed alarmist tactics, or turnout issues, Netanyahu’s seat tally shrank between rounds one and two, and time is now on Benny Gantz’s side. srael’s September 17 election ended with no bloc winning the 61 seats needed for a majority in the 120-seat I parliament. The current tally is 57 seats for the center-left bloc (led by the Blue and White Party with 33), and 55 seats for the right-wing bloc (led by the Likud Party with 31). As a result, the coalition formation process could take weeks, and a power-sharing arrangement seems the most likely (though not certain) outcome. The era of exclusive control by the country’s longest-serving premier, Binyamin Netanyahu, seems to be over, but it is too soon to say whether Blue-White leader Benny Gantz will succeed him. WHY DID NETANYAHU LOSE? T he results indicate that Netanyahu’s party lost eight seats between the April election and this week’s do-over vote, if one factors in the addition of Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon’s party. According to Israel’s Channel 13, the Likud leader blamed the outcome on outlying cities, which are normally strongholds for his party but did not turn out the way they have in past elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Report Is a Student Publication of Resources, Dealing with the Housing Crisis, Reducing the Cost of Living, Encouraging Growth and Improving Productivity
    To provide greater exposure to primary Israeli news sources and opinions in order to become better informed on the issues, and to gain a better understanding of the wide range of perspectives that exist in Israeli society and politics. Issue 1036 • December 23, 2016 • 23 Kislev 5777 STATE ASKS HIGH COURT TO POSTPONE AMONA EVICTION BY 45 duty when they do so, Haaretz has learned. DAYS (Israel Hayom 12/21/16) The new policy is expected to take effect in early 2017. The State Attorney's Office on Tuesday asked the High Court of Justice to Current orders call to court martial any soldier caught possessing any postpone the eviction of the Samaria outpost of Amona by 45 days. The narcotics, marijuana included, even in a civilian setting. outpost is slated to be evicted by Dec. 25. The revised policy would still permit a soldier to be charged for smoking In an agreement with the government reached earlier this week, the residents marijuana or hashish even off duty, but provides an easy loophole to get the were set to be relocated to a nearby plot of land known as Parcel 38, case closed or the charges dropped. The accused soldier would have to registered as abandoned property. However, on Monday, the Yesh Din provide urine samples once a month under a year's probationary period, human rights organization claimed that 90% of the plot belongs to a exhibit motivation for rehabilitation and commit to completing their term of Palestinian man. The organization supported its claim with aerial service with a clean record, and showing they are "back on the right path." photographs apparently showing that the land had been cultivated until 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Name Redacted Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief name redacted Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs February 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Contents U.S.-Israel Relations: Key Concerns ............................................................................................... 1 Israeli-Palestinian Issues ................................................................................................................. 3 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 3 Assessment ................................................................................................................................ 5 Jerusalem ................................................................................................................................... 6 New U.S. Stance ................................................................................................................. 6 Reactions and Policy Implications ...................................................................................... 7 Regional Security Issues.................................................................................................................. 9 Iran and Its Allies .............................................................................................................. 10 Lebanon-Syria Border Area and Hezbollah .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Soundly Defeats Chief Rival in Israeli Elections
    Middle East Netanyahu Soundly Defeats Chief Rival in Israeli Elections By Jodi Rudoren, March 17, 2015 TEL AVIV — After a bruising campaign focused on his failings, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel won a clear victory in Tuesday’s elections and seemed all but certain to form a new government and serve a fourth term, though he offended many voters and alienated allies in the process. With 99.5 percent of the ballots counted, the YNet news site reported Wednesday morning that Mr. Netanyahu’s Likud Party had captured 29 or 30 of the 120 seats in Parliament, sweeping past his chief rival, the center-left Zionist Union alliance, which got 24 seats. Mr. Netanyahu and his allies had seized on earlier exit polls that showed a slimmer Likud lead to create an aura of inevitability, and celebrated with singing and dancing. While his opponents vowed a fight, Israeli political analysts agreed even before most of the ballots were counted that he had the advantage, with more seats having gone to the right-leaning parties likely to support him. It was a stunning turnabout from the last pre-election polls published Friday, which showed the Zionist Union, led by Isaac Herzog, with a four- or five-seat lead and building momentum, and the Likud polling close to 20 seats. To bridge the gap, Mr. Netanyahu embarked on a last-minute scorched-earth campaign, promising that no Palestinian state would be established as long as he remained in office and insulting Arab citizens. Mr. Netanyahu, who served as prime minister for three years in the 1990s and returned to office in 2009, exulted in what he called “a huge victory” and said he had spoken to the heads of all the parties “in the national camp” and urged them to help him form a government “without any further ado.” “I am proud of the Israeli people that, in the moment of truth, knew how to separate between what’s important or what’s not and to stand up for what’s important,” he told an exuberant crowd early Wednesday morning at Likud’s election party at the Tel Aviv Fairgrounds.
    [Show full text]