2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2007 Israeli Democracy Index Is Dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a Beloved Friend Who Went to War and Did Not Come Back Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Cohesion in a Divided Society Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar The Israel Democracy Institute is an independent, non-partisan body on the seam of academia and politics. The Institute proposes policy recommendations and reforms for government and public administration agencies. In its plans and endeavors, the Institute strives to support the institutions of Israel’s developing democracy and consolidate its values. The Institute’s research is followed up by practical recommendations, seeking to improve governance in Israel and foster a long-term vision for a stable democratic regime adapted to the structure, the values, and the norms of Israeli society. The Institute aspires to further public discourse in Israel on the issues placed on the national agenda, to promote structural, political, and economic reforms, to serve as a consulting body to decision-makers and the broad public, to provide information, and present comparative research. Researchers at the Israel Democracy Institute are leading academics directing projects in various areas of society and governance in Israel. The IDI Press produces, markets, and distributes the results of their work in several series of books (“The Democracy Library”), policy papers, the Caesarea Forum Series, periodicals, and conference proceedings. The Guttman Center was established in its present form in 1998, when the Guttman Institute for Applied Social Research became part of the Israel Democracy Institute. Professor Louis Guttman founded the original Institute in 1949 as a pioneering center for the study of public opinion and the advancement of social science methodology. The goal of the Guttman Center is to enrich public discourse on issues of public policy through the information retrieved from the Center’s databases and through public opinion surveys conducted by the Center. Asher Arian is a Senior Fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute and a Professor of Political Science at the University of Haifa (emeritus) and at the City University of New York. Nir Atmor and Yael Hadar are Research Assistants at the Israel Democracy Institute. Translator: Batya Stein Language Editor (English): Naomi Shmueli David Language Editors (Hebrew): Izhak Tishler, Anat Bernstein Series and Cover Design: Ron Haran Layout: Art Plus, Jerusalem Printed by Art Plus, Jerusalem ISBN 978-965-519-035-8 No portion of this book may be reproduced, copied, photographed, recorded, translated, stored in a database, broadcast, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, optic, mechanical, or otherwise. Commercial use in any form of the material contained in this book without express written permission from the publisher is strictly forbidden. © The Israel Democracy Institute Printed in Israel 2007 The Israel Democracy Institute’s books and policy papers may be ordered from: Tel: (972)-2-5300800, 1-800-20-2222; Fax: (972)-2-5300867 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.idi.org.il The Israel Democracy Institute, P.O. Box 4482, Jerusalem 91044 All Indices of Democracy are now online and available for free download at www.idi.org.il. Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables 7 Acknowledgements 9 Summary 11 Part One: The Democracy Index 2007 A. Description of the Research and Its Goals 15 B. The Democracy Indicators 19 1. A Summary Outline 19 2. Israel 2007 as Reflected in the Indicators 19 3. Selected Findings 24 C. The Democracy Survey 2007 35 1. A Summary Outline 35 2. Public Perception of Democracy’s Implementation in Israel 2007 35 3. Democratic Attitudes in the Israeli Public in 2007 37 4. Selected Findings 40 5. Democracy: Support and Satisfaction 46 Part Two: Cohesion in a Divided Society A. Background: Cohesion in Israel 53 B. Social Trust in Israel 57 C. Relationships between Groups in Israel 2007 61 1. The Jewish-Arab Cleavage 61 2. The Social-Economic Cleavage 68 3. The Religious-Secular Cleavage 73 4. The New Immigrants–Old-Timers Cleavage 77 5. The Ethnic Cleavage 79 D. Social Cohesion in Israel 83 1. Perceptions of Readiness to Compromise 83 2. Self-Identity and Self-Definition 87 3. Contribution to Society: The IDF and Defense 90 4. A Sense of Being Part of the Country 93 Epilogue 99 Appendices 101 1. Summary of the Democracy Indices, 2003-2007 101 2. The Democracy Index 2007 Compared to the Democracy Indices 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 104 3. Distributions in the Democracy Survey, February 2007 111 4. Calendar of Events, January 2006 – May 2007 119 7 List of Figures and Tables Figure 1 The Structure of the Index 15 Figure 2 Israel’s Ranking in the Democracies’ Sample According to 23 Criteria 20 Figure 3 Political Corruption: An International Comparison 26 Figure 4 Integrity in Two Measures of Political Corruption, 1996-2006 27 Figure 5 Voice and Accountability: An International Comparison 28 Figure 6 Voice and Accountability, 1996-2005 28 Figure 7 Economic Freedom: An International Comparison 30 Figure 8 Economic Freedom, 1995-2007 31 Figure 9 Law and Order: An International Comparison 32 Figure 10 Rule of Law: An International Comparison 32 Figure 11 Rule of Law, 1996-2005 33 Figure 12 Political Stability: An International Comparison 34 Figure 13 Political Stability, 1996-2005 34 Figure 14 Perception of Democracy’s Implementation: Israeli Public 2003 and 2007 38 Figure 15 Democratic Attitudes: Israeli Public 2003 and 2007 39 Figure 16 Assessing Democracy’s Implementation in the Institutional Aspect 40 within Groups in the Israeli Public: Jewish Old-Timers, Immigrants from the CIS, and Arabs Figure 17 Accountability, 1969-2007 41 Figure 18 Sense of Political Influence, 1973-2007 42 Figure 19 Sense of Political Influence: An International Comparison 43 Figure 20 Trust in Key Institutions: IDF, Supreme Court, Police, 2003-2007 44 Figure 21 Trust in Key Institutions: President, Prime Minister, Knesset, Political Parties, 2003-2007 44 Figure 22 Protecting Democracy, 2003-2007 45 Figure 23 Support for Strong Leaders, 1969-2007 47 Figure 24 Personal Feelings Considering the Current Situation, 1973-2007 48 Figure 25 Satisfaction with the Situation of Israel, 1997-2007 49 Figure 26 Satisfaction with Israeli Democracy, 1987-2007 50 Figure 27 Personal Social Trust, 1980-2007 58 Figure 28 Personal Social Trust: An International Comparison 59 Figure 29 Social Trust, 1981-2007 59 Figure 30 Social Trust: Groups in Israeli Society 60 Figure 31 Relationships between Groups, 2007 62 Figure 32 Arab-Jews Relationship Pattern According to Nationality, 2000-2007 64 8 Auditing Israeli Democracy – 2007 Figure 33 Political Equality for the Arab Minority, 1993-2007 65 Figure 34 Equal Rights for the Arab Minority, 1985-2007 67 Figure 35 Opposition to the Encouragement of Arab Emigration, 1987-2007 68 Figure 36 Inequality – GINI Coefficient: An International Comparison 70 Figure 37 Inequality – Rich-Poor Relationships: An International Comparison 71 Figure 38 Rich-Poor Relationships, 2003-2007 72 Figure 39 Capitalist vs. Socialist Economy, 1962-2007 73 Figure 40 Observance of Jewish Tradition, 1981-2007 75 Figure 41 Living According to Jewish Religious Tradition, 1981-2007 75 Figure 42 Relationship between Religious and Non-Religious Jews, 1972-2007 76 Figure 43 Relationship between New Immigrants and Old-Timers, 1975-2007 79 Figure 44 Relationship between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim, 1972-2007 81 Figure 45 Relationship between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim According to Country of Origin 81 Figure 46 Readiness to Compromise 84 Figure 47 Readiness to Compromise According to Self-Definition and Nationality 85 Figure 48 Readiness to Compromise According to Self-Definition on the Right-Left Continuum 85 Figure 49 Readiness to Compromise According to Level of Religious Observance 86 Figure 50 Identity: Self-Definition 87 Figure 51 Identity: Self-Definition According to Self-Ascription of Religious Orientation (first choice only) 88 Figure 52 Identity: Self-Definition According to Self-Ascription of Religious Orientation (second choice only) 89 Figure 53 Identity: Self-Definition – Israeli Arabs 89 Figure 54 Army Service: An International Comparison 91 Figure 55 Characteristics of Youths: An Evaluation 92 Figure 56 Proud to be Israeli, 2003-2007 93 Figure 57 Proud to be Israeli According to Self-Definition of Religiosity 94 Figure 58 Connection to Israel, 2003-2007 95 Figure 59 Connection to the Jewish People, 1991-2007 96 Figure 60 Remaining in Israel, 1986-2007 97 Figure 61 Reasons for Doubting Life in Israel, 1986-2007 98 Table 1 Israel 2007 as Reflected in the Indicators: Changes since the 2006 Index 23 9 Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr. Yagil Levy for his perceptive and valuable advice and Michael Philippov for his efforts and contribution to the study; Dr. Raphael Ventura, Eli Sapir, and Ayala Hendin for their assistance in collecting data; Carmit Gai for her assistance in editing this publication; and the Institute’s publication staff for their meticulous and devoted work in the preparation of this book. The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index is dedicated to Captain Zur Zarhi from Nahalal, a beloved friend who went to war and did not come back. Zur fell in the Second Lebanon War on August 13, 2006. He was 27 years old. 11 Summary Social cohesion has always been a themselves as an inseparable part of the prominent characteristic of Israeli society. In State of Israel and its problems and are ready ordinary times, and particularly in times of to fight for the country should the need arise. trouble, values of mutuality, solidarity, and Most respondents are interested in politics cohesiveness have stood out. In recent years, and talk with their friends and family about however, and particularly in the months that political issues. Beside their pride about the followed the Second Lebanon War, feelings country and their concern with it, most of of weariness, affront, and disgust with them are in a good or very good mood, and political processes in general and with the think they will be able to adapt to the current political system in particular have become situation; 74% have trust in the IDF despite widespread in Israel.
Recommended publications
  • Israel Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, November 4 Headlines: Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria EU Declares Israel Boycott Protected as Free Speech Pro-Israel Alliance Prepares for 2017 Anti-Israel Campaign Lieberman Appoints new IDF deputy, Air Force Commander IDF Prevented US Diplomats from Visiting Jordan V. Pal. Israeli Exit Poll: Trump 49%, Clinton 44% David Duke: Jews Dominate Media, International Banking Report: Israel's UN Ambassador Made Secret Visit to Dubai Commentary: Yedioth Ahronoth: “Rabin, The Leader Who Taught Me Everything” By Moshe (Bogie) Yaalon, former IDF chief of staff and Minister of Defense Al Monitor: “Can battle over public broadcasting bring down Netanyahu?” By Ben Caspit, Senior Columnist at Al-Monitor’s Israel Pulse. S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts November 4, 2016 Ynet News Ex-Shin Bet Chief: Iran Has 25,000 Fighters in Syria Iran now commands a force of around 25,000 Shi'ite Muslim militants in Syria, mostly made up of recruits from Afghanistan and Pakistan, the former head of Israel's domestic intelligence agency has told a visiting Swiss delegation. Avi Dichter, chair of Israel's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, told members of the Swiss parliament the Iranian-backed force was focused on fighting Sunni rebels opposed to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, not ISIS. "This is a foreign legion of some 25,000 militants, most of whom have come from Afghanistan and Pakistan," Dichter told the delegation, according to details provided by his office.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden
    Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden Two other parties that may be possible coalition partners: · United Torah Judaism – Essentially, it is only concerned with internal issues. Its real demand is maintaining social services and allowances for their constituents. Other issues: Maintaining the powers of the Orthodox Rabbinical Courts over civil issues such as marriage, divorce, burial, etc. are among their top priorities, along with maintaining the Sabbath laws preventing work on the “Holy Day”, laws keeping ultra-Orthodox youth out of army service, etc. Although their constituency is sympathetic to the settlers and the Right, the leadership stresses that they are willing to support any coalition that accedes to their demands. As Olmert does not need them to guarantee the stability of the coalition, he won’t be “courting” them. Some of the issues that may affect their position in coalition negotiations are their rivalry with Shas and their often-confrontational relations with Meretz and groups within the Labor party over freedom of religion. · Meretz – The party that is the Israeli equivalent of the “Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”, Meretz and its predecessors have been at the forefront of not only the contacts that led to direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO (and the ensuing Oslo Accords), but from the earliest days after the creation of the State of Israel also have led the struggle for equal rights for Israel’s Arab citizens, labor & union rights, women’s rights, freedom of the press and freedom of religion issues, gay rights, etc. It endorses negotiated withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank, including parts of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen
    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 08/15 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 01.- 15. April Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches Atomprogramm ....................................................................................... 1 2. Tragödie von Yarmouk ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Koalitionsverhandlungen und Perspektiven für eine Einheitsregierung ........................................................... 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Rahmenabkommen über iranisches ously damage Iran's nuclear facilities. The alterna- Atomprogramm tive is living (or dying) with a nuclear weapons- Das Anfang April erreichte Rahmenabkommen der capable fanatical, tyrannical, aggressive regime fünf UN-Vetomächte und Deutschlands mit der irani- much more dangerous for the rest of the world than schen Regierung stieß in Jerusalem auf scharfe North Korea will ever be. Too bad the meetings Kritik. Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanyahu warnte weren't held in the holy city of Qom. In that case the in einem Telefonat mit US-Präsident Barack Obama comparison with the betrayal of Czechoslovakia by vor einer existentiellen Gefahr für Israel. Die Eck- the British and French in 1938 would have been punkte, die bis zum Sommer in einen Vertrag mün- even more perfect. That famous meeting, leading to den sollen,
    [Show full text]
  • How Palestinians Can Burst Israel's Political Bubble
    Al-Shabaka Policy Brief Policy Al-Shabaka March 2018 WHEN LEFT IS RIGHT: HOW PALESTINIANS CAN BURST ISRAEL’S POLITICAL BUBBLE By Amjad Iraqi Overview the allies holding up his fragile rule, from the ultra- orthodox Jewish parties to his personal rivals within Although no indictments have been issued yet, Israelis Likud. “King Bibi,” however, survived them all. A are speculating whether the latest developments in skilled politician, he has been adept at managing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s corruption Israel’s notoriously volatile coalition system, and [email protected] scandals finally mark the beginning of his political has remained in power with three consecutive demise. The second-longest serving prime minister governments over nine years – each more right wing after David Ben-Gurion, Netanyahu has had a than the last.2 profound impact on Israel’s political scene since the 1990s. It is therefore troubling, especially to Netanyahu directly influenced the country’s media Palestinians, that if these corruption cases are the landscape by shaping the editorial stance of Israel harbinger of Netanyahu’s downfall, they will have Hayom (the nation’s gratis, most-read newspaper, had nothing to do with the more egregious crimes for funded by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson), which he is responsible, and for which he – and future and used the Communications Ministry to threaten Israeli leaders – have yet to be held accountable. and harass media outlets that were critical of him. Despite crises and condemnations throughout This policy brief analyzes Israel’s political his career – including mass Israeli protests for transformations under Netanyahu and maps out the socioeconomic justice in 2011 and, more recently, current leadership contenders from a Palestinian weekly protests against widespread government perspective.1 It argues that Israel’s insular political corruption – Netanyahu withstood public pressures discourse, and the increasing alignment of Israeli to step down.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Research. Debate. Impact. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Table of Contents Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board 4 Sixth Meeting of IDI's International Advisory Council 8 The Center for Democratic Values and Institutions 11 The Center for Religion, Nation and State 23 The Center for Governance and the Economy 29 The Center for Security and Democracy 35 The Guttman Center for Surveys and Public Policy Research 41 IDI in the Media 47 Our Team 50 Our Leaders 51 Our Partners 52 Financials 53 Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board Dear Friends, 2016 was a year of change and upheaval throughout the jobs available to Haredim. The government adopted most of democratic world. Set against the tumult of Brexit and the the recommendations and is now in the process of allocating US elections, Israel seemed at times like an island of stability. a half-billion-shekel budget in line with these proposals. This However, under the surface, Israeli society is changing, and IDI success story illustrates the potential of turning relatively small took on a leading role in identifying those changes and working philanthropic investments into large-scale transformational with policymakers to address them. change by affecting policy and legislation on the basis of outstanding applied research. As the report that follows lays out, 2016 was a year rich in activity and achievements. In this letter, we have chosen to single Several new scholars joined our team in 2016. Ms. Daphna out the impact one program had on government policy in the Aviram-Nitzan, former director of research for the Israel employment area.
    [Show full text]
  • Monday, July 3
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Wednesday, May 27 Headlines: After Rocket Attack, Israeli Jets Strike Targets in Gaza Strip Ya'alon: Gaza Will Pay a Heavy Price if Calm is Not Maintained Palestinians Reject Proposal to Discuss Settlement Borders US Says Reported 'Settlement Borders' Proposal New to its Ears Netanyahu Embarks on Senior Civil Service 'Beheadings' Kahlon: I Will Not Take Part in Gas-Related Decisions A New Headache: Begin Refuses to Resign Amnesty Report: Hamas has Committed War Crimes in Gaza Commentary: Yedioth Haronoth: “The Jerusalem Paradox” By Haim Ramon Foreign Policy: “Benjamin Netanyahu’s Grade A Pork-Barrel Politics” By Neri Zilber S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor News Excerpts May 27, 2015 Times of Israel After Rocket Attack, Israeli Jets Strike Targets in Gaza Strip The Israeli Air Force launched airstrikes on the Gaza Strip early Wednesday morning, hours after a projectile fired from the coastal enclave fell in southern Israel, causing no damage. There were no immediate reports of casualties in the bombardments across the Palestinian coastal enclave. The IDF said in a statement that it targeted four sites of terror infrastructure in the southern Gaza Strip in response to the rocket fire at southern Israel on Tuesday evening. The military said it confirmed direct hits. “The reality that Hamas’s territory is used as a staging ground to attack Israel is unacceptable and intolerable
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States
    Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law LARC @ Cardozo Law Articles Faculty 2010 Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States Malvina Halberstam Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Malvina Halberstam, Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States, 31 Cardozo Law Review 2393 (2010). Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/68 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty at LARC @ Cardozo Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of LARC @ Cardozo Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. JUDICIAL REVIEW, A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: ISRAEL, CANADA, AND THE UNITED STATES INTRODUCTION Malvina Halberstam∗ On April 26, 2009, the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law hosted a roundtable discussion, Judicial Review, a Comparative Perspective: Israel, Canada, and the United States, with prominent jurists, statesmen, academics, and practicing attorneys.∗∗ The panel was comprised of Justice Morris Fish of the Canadian Supreme Court; Justice Elyakim Rubinstein of the Israeli Supreme Court; Judge Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Hon. Irwin Cotler, a member of the Canadian Parliament and formerly Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada; Hon. Michael Eitan, a Minister in the government of Israel, a member of the Knesset (Israeli Parliament), and former chair of the Committee on the Constitution, Law and Justice; Professor Daniel Friedmann, formerly Minister of Justice of Israel, who proposed legislation to remedy what some view as serious problems with judicial review in Israel; Nathan Lewin, one of the most eminent attorneys in the United States, who has argued many cases before the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterscriptie Staats- En Bestuursrecht
    Masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht Het vrije mandaat: feit of fictie? Beperkingen aan fractieafsplitsingen getoetst aan het vrije mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden Auteur A. (Arie) Vonk Noordegraaf LL.B. Studentnummer 3675386 Begeleider prof. mr. R. Nehmelman Datum 22 maart 2017 Sol Iustitiae Illustra Nos - Zon der Gerechtigheid, verlicht ons 2 Voorwoord Maartensdijk, 22 maart 2017 Met het afronden van mijn masterscriptie Staats- en Bestuursrecht komt er einde aan mijn studietijd aan de Universiteit Utrecht. Ik heb de afgelopen jaren enorm veel geleerd en ook genoten van de vele juridische vraagstukken die besproken werden. Na het afronden van de bachelor Rechtsgeleerdheid met een scriptie over de vrijheid van onderwijs was de master Staats- en Bestuursrecht een voor de hand liggende keuze. De master sloot goed aan op mijn (politieke) interesses. Hoewel ik zowel het staatsrecht als het bestuursrecht bestudeerde, ligt mijn hart toch echt bij het staatsrecht. Deze scriptie is daar een bewijs van. Het is mooi om juist in dit voorjaar mijn masterscriptie af te ronden. Het jaar 2017 is in het licht van het onderwerp van deze masterscriptie namelijk een bijzonder jaar. Het is dit jaar precies honderd jaar geleden dat in 1917 het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging werd ingevoerd. Het jaar 1917 is een keerpunt in de parlementaire geschiedenis van Nederland. Enerzijds is dit het begin van de hedendaagse parlementaire democratie. Anderzijds is de invoering van het stelsel van evenredige vertegenwoordiging ook een bedreiging voor het vrije en persoonlijke mandaat van Tweede Kamerleden. De partijmacht wordt groter terwijl individuele Tweede Kamerleden ook in 2017 worden geacht zonder last te stemmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech-Israeli Intergovernmental Consultations Joint Statement Prague, May 17, 2012 Today, May 17, 2012, the Government of the C
    Czech-Israeli Intergovernmental Consultations Joint Statement Prague, May 17, 2012 Today, May 17, 2012, the Government of the Czech Republic and the Israeli Government are holding their intergovernmental consultations in Prague. The Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Mr. Petr Ne čas, and the Prime Minister of the State of Israel, Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu, note with satisfaction the friendship and the historical partnership between the two countries, the unrelenting reciprocal support, the mutual respect for each other's sovereign status and the joint recognition in the political, defense and economic requirements of the two countries. The Prime Ministers emphasize their aspiration to further strengthen the close relations between the two Governments and the unique ties between the two peoples, based on a thousand-year-old affinity between the Czech people and the Jewish people. The Prime Ministers wish to thank all those who work tirelessly to advance the ties between the two countries. The following are the Government members participating in the consultations: On the Czech Republic side: Prime Minister Petr Ne čas First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs , Karel Schwarzenberg Minister of Industry and Trade, Martin Kuba Minister of Education, Youth and Sports, Petr Fiala Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, Jaromír Drábek Minister of Transport, Pavel Dobeš Minister for Regional Development, Kamil Jankovský Minister of Culture, Alena Hanáková On the Israeli side: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Deputy Prime Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae
    The College of Management-Academic Studies April 2008 Date: September 16, 2014 Dr. Dalia Liran-Alper – Curriculum Vitae Personal Details: Academic Degree: PhD Phone Number at: Mobile: 0546-665480 School/Department: School of Media Studies, The College of Management-Academic Studies Academic Education: Name of higher education Year degree Year/s institution Subject Degree or diploma received 1976-1979 Hebrew University of International Relations, BA 1980 Jerusalem History 1980-1983 Hebrew University of Communication MA (practical 1983 Jerusalem program) 1989-1994 Hebrew University of Communication Thesis (theory 1994 Jerusalem program) 1998-2005 University of Haifa Education, Communication PhD 2005 M.A. and Ph.D. Details: (Institution, Adviser/s, Title) Masters thesis: Media representation of women in politics: Are they still “Domineering dowagers and scheming concubines”? (1994) Adviser: Prof. Gadi Wolfsfeld Doctoral thesis: Sociocultural construction of gendered identity among girls attending dance classes in Israel (2004) Adviser: Tamar Katriel Further Studies: Teaching license program, Levinsky College of Education, Tel Aviv (1995-1996) Academic Experience – Teaching: Year/s Name of institution Department/program Rank/position 1980-1992 The Open University International relations, Social patterns Instructor in Israel, Mass media, and others 1993-1997 Levinsky College of Faculty of Education, Teacher Lecturer Education Training 2011-1989 Beit Berl Academic School of Education, Department of Lecturer College Social Sciences 1994-2004
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Jewish and Democratic
    Israel: Jewish and Democratic Professor Gil Troy and Martin J. Raffel Introduction The moral and legal right of the Jewish people to national self-determination in its historic homeland has been challenged by rejectionists in the Arab world and anti-Zionists in the West since the beginning of the Zionist movement. A concerted assault on Israel's legitimacy, the effort to paint Israel as the new apartheid South Afri- ca, was launched by a global network of Arab and Western NGOs at the UN’s World Conference against Rac- ism, Racial Intolerance and Xenophobia in Durban in 2001. In recent years, the idea that there is something inherently contradictory between Israel's identity as both Jewish and democratic has begun to penetrate into mainstream academic and journalistic circles. While democracies often have to balance different ideals, such as liberty and equality, Israel’s critics are using whatever tensions they see between “Jewish” and “democratic” ideals to question Israel’s very right to exist in its current form. There is a wealth of existing material that persuasively refutes this specious allegation, including books and monographs (see list at the end). Nevertheless, we concluded that a shorter document, more accessible to those directly facing the assault on Israel's legitimacy in communities and on campuses, was needed. What follows is an attempt to provide answers to commonly asked questions that will enable both community and campus activ- ists to confront this issue with confidence and integrity. We will explain that: ► Being Jewish is not merely a religious category like Christianity or Islam; it also means belonging to a people with a culture, language, shared history and national identity, and in that respect is more akin to Italian, Irish or Polish identity.
    [Show full text]