DOCSLIB.ORG

Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa • by the Early 1900S, European Nations Had Colonized Nearly All of Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa • by the Early 1900S, European Nations Had Colonized Nearly All of Africa Africa’s Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa • By the early 1900s, European nations had colonized nearly all of Africa. • African people had little say in the laws that were made under European rule. • Today, there are more than 50 independent African nations. • Some of these countries have established democracies, while others are suppressed by autocracies. Government TYPES– HOW DO CITIZENS PARTICIPATE? • Autocracy-- 1 person possesses unlimited power & citizens have limited role in government • Democracy--supreme power is vested in the people & exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation involving free elections TWO TYPES OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS: • Parliamentary– citizens elect members of Parliament, and then the members select the leader o Leader works with or through the legislature • Presidential--system of government in which the leader is constitutionally independent of the legislature; citizens directly elect leader o Leader works separate from legislature Presidential Representative Democratic Republic • Kenya became independent from Great Britain on December 12th, 1963 under the leadership of Jomo Kenyatta. • Kenya has recently experienced many changes in its government. • The new constitution (2010) introduced significant legislative changes, such as a new bicameral legislature, the abolishment of the prime minister, and having female representation from each of Kenya’s 47 counties. Jomo Kenyatta served as Kenya’s president from 1964 to 1978. • The constitution also promises to reduce corruption in the government and to provide better protection of citizens’ rights. • Kenya is currently a democratic republic with an elected president and a bicameral legislature. The Kenyatta International Conference Centre, in Nairobi, houses a number of Kenya’s government offices. • Kenya’s president acts as both chief executive and head of state. • As the chief executive, Kenya’s president holds a lot of power and is involved in the day-to-day business of running the country. • As the head of state, the president attends Kenya’s ceremonies and meets with leaders from all around the world. Uhuru Kenyatta Kenya’s President • The president is directly elected by a popular vote from the people. • He or she serves a five-year term and is eligible for a second term if elected. • The Parliament of Kenya is the country’s bicameral legislature. • It consists of two houses—the Senate and the National Assembly. • Citizens are responsible for electing members for both houses. Inside Kenya’s Parliament • The citizens directly elect the president every 5 years. • The president works separately from Kenya’s Parliament. • Citizens must be 18 to vote, but voting is not required by law. • As a democracy, its citizens can participate in voting and elections. • The citizens vote for the president, as well as for members of the parliament. Voting in Kenya – March 2013 • Even though Kenya is a democracy, the citizens do not have too much say in the government. • Much of the decision-making process is made by the president and his party. • Freedoms are written into the constitution, but government is dominated by the president. • Corruption has also been a major problem as many politicians take bribes. • Also, because many African cultures view politics as a male occupation, women are not equally represented in Kenya’s government. Presidential Representative Democratic Republic • On October 1st, 1960, Great Britain granted Nigeria independence under the leadership of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, the first Nigerian- elected prime minister. • At first, Nigeria was one of the more stable governments in Africa. • Nigeria suffered from violence and military rule from 1966 until 1999, when a democratic government was finally established. Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, the first Nigerian-elected prime minister • The constitution also promises to reduce corruption in the government and to provide better protection of citizens’ rights. • Kenya is currently a democratic republic with an elected president and a bicameral legislature. The National Assembly building in Abuja is home to Nigeria’s legislature. • Nigeria’s president acts as both chief executive and head of state. • As the chief executive, Nigeria’s president holds a lot of power and is involved in the day-to-day business of running the country. • As the head of state, the president attends Nigeria’s ceremonies and meets with leaders from all around the world. Muhammadu Buhari Nigeria’s President • Nigeria’s president is directly elected by a popular vote from the people. • He or she serves a five-year term and is eligible for a second term if elected. • The Nigerian National Assembly is the country’s bicameral legislature. • It consists of two houses—the Senate and the House of Representatives. • Members of both houses are elected by Nigeria’s citizens. Inside Nigeria’s Parliament • The citizens directly elect the president every 5 years. • The president works separately from Nigeria’s National Assembly (legislature). • Citizens must be 18 to vote, but voting is not required by law. • As a democracy, its citizens can participate in voting and elections. • The citizens vote for the president, as well as for members of the legislature. Voting in Nigeria - 2015 • Nigeria is a democratic country, but it still has its flaws. • Corruption has been a major issue in Nigeria, as politicians have taken bribes and abused their power to gain personal wealth. • Elections have been afflicted with fraud and unequal voting rights. • Citizens cannot always rely on the courts to protect their rights and freedoms. • Women are not equally represented in the government. The 2015 presidential election was free, fair, and well-conducted. • Became an independent nation in 1961. • Until 1994, South Africa had an oligarchy that was controlled by the white leaders of Apartheid. • Today, the racially segregated government has ended and South Africa is a democracy. The Houses of Parliament, in Cape Town, is home to South Africa’s government. • The president is the chief executive who holds the most political power. • He or she is the head of government and head of state. • He or she is the leader of the party with the most seats in National Assembly. Cyril Ramaphosa South Africa’s President • The parliament selects one of its members to be the president. • He or she serves a five-year term (no more than two terms). • The Parliament of South Africa is the country’s bicameral legislature. • It consists of two houses—the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces. • Citizens elect members to the National Assembly, while lower provincial governments appoint officials to the National Council of Provinces. National Assembly Chamber • The political party with the most members in the National Assembly selects the President. • This is the major difference between a Presidential Democracy and a Parliamentary Democracy! o Parliamentary Democracy – legislature chooses the executive leader • Citizens must be 18 to vote, but voting is not required by law. • As a democracy, its citizens can participate in voting and elections. • The citizens vote for members of the National Assembly (parliament), who then elects the president. • Compared to Nigeria and Kenya, South Africa’s democracy is much stronger. • Elections are fair and the Constitution protects citizens’ rights and freedoms. • People can participate in South Africa’s government by voting for representatives, expressing their opinions on issues, and running for office. • Personal freedoms are more numerous in South Africa since Apartheid (legal separation of the races) has ended. • Unfortunately, even though Apartheid has ended, much of South Africa’s wealth does not reach the black population. • This has caused a very low standard of living among half of the country’s population..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inequality of Child Mortality Among Ethnic Groups in Sub-Saharan Africa M
    Special Theme ±Inequalities in Health Inequality of child mortality among ethnic groups in sub-Saharan Africa M. Brockerhoff1 & P. Hewett2 Accounts by journalists of wars in several countries of sub-Saharan Africa in the 1990s have raised concern that ethnic cleavages and overlapping religious and racial affiliations may widen the inequalities in health and survival among ethnic groups throughout the region, particularly among children. Paradoxically, there has been no systematic examination of ethnic inequality in child survival chances across countries in the region. This paper uses survey data collected in the 1990s in 11 countries (Central African Republic, Coà te d'Ivoire, Ghana, Kenya, Mali, Namibia, Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Uganda, and Zambia) to examine whether ethnic inequality in child mortality has been present and spreading in sub-Saharan Africa since the 1980s. The focus was on one or two groups in each country which may have experienced distinct child health and survival chances, compared to the rest of the national population, as a result of their geographical location. The factors examined to explain potential child survival inequalities among ethnic groups included residence in the largest city, household economic conditions, educational attainment and nutritional status of the mothers, use of modern maternal and child health services including immunization, and patterns of fertility and migration. The results show remarkable consistency. In all 11 countries there were significant differentials between ethnic groups in the odds of dying during infancy or before the age of 5 years. Multivariate analysis shows that ethnic child mortality differences are closely linked with economic inequality in many countries, and perhaps with differential use of child health services in countries of the Sahel region.
    [Show full text]
  • Kareem Olawale Bestoyin*
    Historia Actual Online, 46 (2), 2018: 43-57 ISSN: 1696-2060 OIL, POLITICS AND CONFLICTS IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NIGERIA AND SOUTH SUDAN Kareem Olawale Bestoyin* *University of Lagos, Nigeria. E-mail: [email protected] Recibido: 3 septiembre 2017 /Revisado: 28 septiembre 2017 /Aceptado: 12 diciembre 2017 /Publicado: 15 junio 2018 Resumen: A lo largo de los años, el Áfica sub- experiencing endemic conflicts whose conse- sahariana se ha convertido en sinónimo de con- quences have been under development and flictos. De todas las causas conocidas de conflic- abject poverty. In both countries, oil and poli- tos en África, la obtención de abundantes re- tics seem to be the driving force of most of cursos parece ser el más prominente y letal. these conflicts. This paper uses secondary data Nigeria y Sudán del Sur son algunos de los mu- and qualitative methodology to appraise how chos países ricos en recursos en el África sub- the struggle for the hegemony of oil resources sahariana que han experimentado conflictos shapes and reshapes the trajectories of con- endémicos cuyas consecuencias han sido el flicts in both countries. Hence this paper de- subdesarrollo y la miserable pobreza. En ambos ploys structural functionalism as the framework países, el petróleo y las políticas parecen ser el of analysis. It infers that until the structures of hilo conductor de la mayoría de estos conflic- governance are strengthened enough to tackle tos. Este artículo utiliza metodología de análisis the developmental needs of the citizenry, nei- de datos secundarios y cualitativos para evaluar ther the amnesty programme adopted by the cómo la pugna por la hegemonía de los recur- Nigerian government nor peace agreements sos energéticos moldea las trayectorias de los adopted by the government of South Sudan can conflictos en ambos países.
    [Show full text]
  • East and Central Africa 19
    Most countries have based their long-term planning (‘vision’) documents on harnessing science, technology and innovation to development. Kevin Urama, Mammo Muchie and Remy Twingiyimana A schoolboy studies at home using a book illuminated by a single electric LED lightbulb in July 2015. Customers pay for the solar panel that powers their LED lighting through regular instalments to M-Kopa, a Nairobi-based provider of solar-lighting systems. Payment is made using a mobile-phone money-transfer service. Photo: © Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg via Getty Images 498 East and Central Africa 19 . East and Central Africa Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo (Republic of), Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Kenya, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda Kevin Urama, Mammo Muchie and Remy Twiringiyimana Chapter 19 INTRODUCTION which invest in these technologies to take a growing share of the global oil market. This highlights the need for oil-producing Mixed economic fortunes African countries to invest in science and technology (S&T) to Most of the 16 East and Central African countries covered maintain their own competitiveness in the global market. in the present chapter are classified by the World Bank as being low-income economies. The exceptions are Half the region is ‘fragile and conflict-affected’ Cameroon, the Republic of Congo, Djibouti and the newest Other development challenges for the region include civil strife, member, South Sudan, which joined its three neighbours religious militancy and the persistence of killer diseases such in the lower middle-income category after being promoted as malaria and HIV, which sorely tax national health systems from low-income status in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Taxation Treaty Between Ireland and the Republic of South Africa
    Double Taxation Treaty between Ireland and South Africa The Government of Ireland and the Government of the Republic of South Africa, desiring to conclude a Convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income and capital gains and to promote and strengthen the economic relations between the two countries, Have agreed as follows: 1 Article 1 Persons Covered This Convention shall apply to persons who are residents of one or both of the Contracting States. 2 Article 2 Taxes Covered 1. This Convention shall apply to taxes on income and capital gains imposed on behalf of a Contracting State or of its political subdivisions, irrespective of the manner in which they are levied. 2. There shall be regarded as taxes on income and capital gains all taxes imposed on total income, or on elements of income, including taxes on gains from the alienation of movable or immovable property. 3. The existing taxes to which this Convention shall apply are: a. in Ireland: i. the income tax; ii. the corporation tax;and iii. the capital gains tax;(hereinafter referred to as "Irish tax"); and b. in South Africa: i. the normal tax; and ii. the secondary tax on companies;(hereinafter referred to as "South African tax"). 4. The Convention shall apply also to any identical or substantially similar taxes which are imposed by either Contracting State after the date of signature of the Convention in addition to, or in place of, the existing taxes. The competent authorities of the Contracting States shall notify each other of any significant changes which have been made in their respective taxation laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem
    Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem: Lessons from Kenya and Nigeria’s Internet Exchange Point Growth By Michael Kende June 2020 CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 internetsociety.org 1 Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Table of contents 3 Executive summary 6 Background: A vision for Africa 8 Introduction: How to get there from here 13 Success stories: Kenya and Nigeria today 18 Results that stand the test of time 20 Change factors: Replicable steps toward measurable outcomes 27 Market gaps 29 Recommendations 33 Conclusions 34 Annex A: Kenya Internet Exchange Point 35 Annex B: Internet Exchange Point of Nigeria 36 Annex C: Acknowledgments 37 Annex D: Glossary of terms 38 Annex E: List of figures and tables CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 internetsociety.org 2 Anchoring the African Internet Ecosystem Executive summary In 2010, the Internet Society’s team in Africa set an The rapid pace of Internet ecosystem ambitious goal that 80% of African Internet traffic development in both Kenya and Nigeria since would be locally accessible by 2020. 2012 underscores the critical role that IXPs Internet Exchange Points (IXPs) are key to realizing and the accompanying infrastructure play in this goal in that they enable local traffic exchange and the establishment of strong and sustainable access to content. To document this role, in 2012, the Internet ecosystems. Internet Society commissioned a study to identify and quantify the significant benefits of two leading African This development produces significant day-to-day IXPs at the time: KIXP in Kenya and IXPN in Nigeria. value—the present COVID-19 crisis magnifies one such The Internet Society is pleased to publish this update benefit in the smooth accommodation of sudden of the original study.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999
    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Quality of Care in Family Planning, Antenatal, and Sick Child Services at Health Facilities in Kenya, Namibia, and Senegal
    ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF CARE IN FaMILY PLANNING, ANTENATAL, AND SICK CHILD SERVICES AT HEALTH FACILITIES IN KENYA, NAMIBIA, AND SENEGAL DHS ANALYTICAL STUDIES 44 SEPTEMBER 2014 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Wenjuan Wang, Mai Do, John Hembling, and Paul Ametepi. DHS Analytical Studies No. 44 Assessing the Quality of Care in Family Planning, Antenatal, and Sick Child Services at Health Facilities in Kenya, Namibia, and Senegal Wenjuan Wang Mai Do John Hembling Paul Ametepi ICF International Rockville, Maryland, USA September 2014 Corresponding author: Wenjuan Wang, International Health and Development, ICF International, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; telephone: +1 301-572-0398: fax: +1 301-572-0950; email: [email protected] Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Sohail Agha for reviewing this report and providing invaluable comments. Editor: Bryant Robey Document Production: Natalie La Roche This study was carried out with support provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through The DHS Program (#AID-OAA-C-13-00095). The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. The DHS Program assists countries worldwide in the collection and use of data to monitor and evaluate population, health, and nutrition programs. For additional information about the DHS Program contact: DHS Program, ICF International, 530 Gaither Road, Suite 500, Rockville, MD 20850, USA; phone: 301-407-6500, fax: 301-407-6501, email: [email protected], Internet: www.dhsprogram.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Historical Context
    INTRODUCTION China-Africa ties have expanded beyond trade and investment in extractive industries to engagement in telecommunications, infrastructure, manufacturing, finance, media, agriculture and peace and security issues. HISTORICAL CONTEXT While not as well documented as Africa’s links with Europe, China-Africa relations date back to the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644) when a series of expeditions reached East Africa under the command of Admiral Zheng He, at roughly the same time as the Portuguese were exploring Africa’s Atlantic coast. However, formal political relations were only forged during the early years of the founding of the People’s Republic of China (1949), which intersected with the first wave of African independence. The Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence were originally established in 1954 by India’s prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and the Chinese premier, Zhou Enlai. These principles rose to popularity during the 1955 Bandung Conference – which paved the way for the founding of the Non-Aligned Movement – and have become an important basis for China’s foreign policy and its relations with Africa and Asia. China’s support for Africa’s liberation also played an influential role in shaping the outcomes of newly independent states. 2015 is also 60 years since the 1955 Bandung Asian-African conference, a turning point of world history when for the first time representatives of the former colonised nations united and proposed alternatives to a world order dominated by superpowers. - Remarks by African Union Commission Chairperson, Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma, 30 January 2015. …The relationship between ourselves and China is founded, as the Prime Minister reminded us recently, on four basic principles: treating each other sincerely and equally; consolidating solidarity and mutual trust; jointly pursuing inclusive development; and promoting inventive practical cooperation between our countries.
    [Show full text]
  • African Dialects
    African Dialects • Adangme (Ghana ) • Afrikaans (Southern Africa ) • Akan: Asante (Ashanti) dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Fante dialect (Ghana ) • Akan: Twi (Akwapem) dialect (Ghana ) • Amharic (Amarigna; Amarinya) (Ethiopia ) • Awing (Cameroon ) • Bakuba (Busoong, Kuba, Bushong) (Congo ) • Bambara (Mali; Senegal; Burkina ) • Bamoun (Cameroons ) • Bargu (Bariba) (Benin; Nigeria; Togo ) • Bassa (Gbasa) (Liberia ) • ici-Bemba (Wemba) (Congo; Zambia ) • Berba (Benin ) • Bihari: Mauritian Bhojpuri dialect - Latin Script (Mauritius ) • Bobo (Bwamou) (Burkina ) • Bulu (Boulou) (Cameroons ) • Chirpon-Lete-Anum (Cherepong; Guan) (Ghana ) • Ciokwe (Chokwe) (Angola; Congo ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Mauritian dialect (Mauritius ) • Creole, Indian Ocean: Seychelles dialect (Kreol) (Seychelles ) • Dagbani (Dagbane; Dagomba) (Ghana; Togo ) • Diola (Jola) (Upper West Africa ) • Diola (Jola): Fogny (Jóola Fóoñi) dialect (The Gambia; Guinea; Senegal ) • Duala (Douala) (Cameroons ) • Dyula (Jula) (Burkina ) • Efik (Nigeria ) • Ekoi: Ejagham dialect (Cameroons; Nigeria ) • Ewe (Benin; Ghana; Togo ) • Ewe: Ge (Mina) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewe: Watyi (Ouatchi, Waci) dialect (Benin; Togo ) • Ewondo (Cameroons ) • Fang (Equitorial Guinea ) • Fõ (Fon; Dahoméen) (Benin ) • Frafra (Ghana ) • Ful (Fula; Fulani; Fulfulde; Peul; Toucouleur) (West Africa ) • Ful: Torado dialect (Senegal ) • Gã: Accra dialect (Ghana; Togo ) • Gambai (Ngambai; Ngambaye) (Chad ) • olu-Ganda (Luganda) (Uganda ) • Gbaya (Baya) (Central African Republic; Cameroons; Congo ) • Gben (Ben) (Togo
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone and Conflict Diamonds: Establshing a Legal Diamond Trade and Ending Rebel Control Over the Country's Diamond Resources
    SIERRA LEONE AND CONFLICT DIAMONDS: ESTABLSHING A LEGAL DIAMOND TRADE AND ENDING REBEL CONTROL OVER THE COUNTRY'S DIAMOND RESOURCES "Controlof resourceshas greaterweight than uniform administrativecontrol over one's entire comer of the world, especially in places such as Sierra Leone where valuable resources are concentratedand portable.' I. INTRODUCTION Sierra Leone2 is in the midst of a civil war that began in 1991, when the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) invaded the country from neighboring Liberia.3 RUF rebels immediately sought control over one of the country's richest resources--diamonds.4 Since gaining control over the most productive diamond fields, the rebels have at their fingertips an endless supply of wealth with which to fund their insurgencies against the Government of Sierra Leone.' The RUF rebels illicitly trade diamonds for arms in open smuggling operations. 6 Diamonds sold by the RUF, in order to fund the rebel group's military action in opposition to Sierra Leone's legitimate and internationally recognized government, are called "conflict diamonds."7 1. WIulIAM RENO, WARLORD POLITICS AND AFRICAN STATES 140 (1998). 2. Sierra Leone is located on the west coast of Africa north of Liberia and south of Guinea. The country has 4,900,000 residents, almost all of whom belong to one of 13 native African tribes. Country: Sierra Leone, Sept. 3,2000, availableat LEXIS, Kaleidoscope File. One of the primary economic activities in Sierra Leone is mining of its large diamond deposits that are a major source of hard currency. Countries that predominantly import goods from Sierra Leone include Belgium, the United States, and India.
    [Show full text]
  • ICS South Africa
    Integrated Country Strategy South Africa FOR PUBLIC RELEASE FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Table of Contents 1. Chief of Mission Priorities ................................................................................................................ 2 2. Mission Strategic Framework .......................................................................................................... 4 3. Mission Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 6 4. Management Objectives ................................................................................................................ 12 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Approved: August 22, 2018 1 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 1. Chief of Mission Priorities There are tremendous opportunities to broaden U.S. engagement in South Africa which stand to benefit both countries. Over 600 U.S. companies already operate in South Africa, some for over 100 years; furthermore, many of them use South Africa as a platform for operations and a springboard for expansion into the rest of Africa. South Africa is therefore the single most critical market hub to a population expecting to double to two billion people in the next 30 years. While some resentment of the United States continues from the apartheid era, there is also recognition of American activism that helped end apartheid. In polls, the United States is seen very favorably by every day South Africans, who respond positively to American politics, culture, and goods. South Africa’s economy is the most
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa
    8/2008 Lessons Learned from Power-Sharing in Africa Håvard Strand, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Scott Gates, Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW) Several power-sharing agreements have been reached in Africa over the last decades. This project has compared the experiences of various forms of power-sharing in five countries, Bu- rundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. The cases differ significantly both with regard to the implementation of power-sharing and the rationale for adopting such institutions. Our conclusions is that power-sharing institutions have proven themselves useful in some countries and less so in others. The most positive experiences have been in the peace processes of Sierra Leone and Liberia, where power-sharing played a vital role in securing peace. There are less clear support for power-sharing institutions with regard to good governance. Introduction tions. Inclusive institutions work towards inte- This project describes power-sharing efforts in grating as many voices as possible into the deci- five conflict-prone and ill-governed African sion-making body, whereas exclusive institutions countries: Burundi, Kenya, Liberia, Nigeria, and create autonomous political spheres. Sierra Leone. While these five countries are The rationale for inclusive institutions as- unique in many important ways, some overar- sumes that exclusion is a key to violent conflict, ching conclusions can nevertheless be drawn and is therefore very focused on not excluding from these studies. Our studies support the any relevant group. The inclusive answer is to conclusion that power-sharing can be a useful provide some guarantees to all parties, so that remedy under certain conditions.
    [Show full text]