Targeting the Dosage Compensation Complex to the Male X

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Targeting the Dosage Compensation Complex to the Male X PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/65589 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2021-09-24 and may be subject to change. Targeting the dosage compensation complex to the male X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster Targeting the dosage compensation complex to the male X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster Gene Expression programme European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Heidelberg, Germany And Department of Molecular Biology Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences (NCMLS) Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands Published by the Radboud University Nijmegen Printed by Ponsen & Looijen bv, Wageningen ISBN/EAN: 978-90-9023194-5 Cover: Artistic interpretation of a Drosophila polytene chromosome squash Targeting the dosage compensation complex to the male X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.CJ.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 20 juni 2008 om 10.30 uur precies door Jop Haico Kind geboren op 28 december 1978 te Lelystad Promotor: prof. dr. H.G. Stunnenberg Copromotor: dr. A. Akhtar, European Moleculair Biology Laboratory Heidelberg, Duitsland Leden manuscriptcommissie: prof. dr. G.J.M Martens prof. dr. C.P. Verrijzer, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam dr. B. van Steensel, Nederlands Kanker Instituut Amsterdam “Caminantes, no hay caminos, hay que caminar” (Text found at a monastery in Toledo, Spain) Table of contents Chapter 1 General introduction 09 preview 10 chromatin 10 higher order chromatin and structure 11 epigentics 13 remodeling chromatin 14 nucleosome assembly/disassembly 15 atp-dependent chromatin remodeling 16 histone variants 18 post translational modifications of histones 19 histone code 21 ptms and chromatin structure 23 thinking globally: the nuclear architecture 25 gene anchoring to the nuclear periphery 26 targeting genes to the npc by mlp1 and mlp2 27 dosage compensation 27 targeting the dosage compensation complex to the x chromosome 29 aim o f the study 30 Chapter 2 Cotransciptional recruitment of the dosage compensation complex to 41 X-linked target genes Chapter 3 Genome-wide analysis reveals MOF as a key regulator of dosage 69 compensation and gene expression in Drosophila Chapter 4 Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation 123 of dosage compensation in Drosophila Chapter 5 Summary and general discussion 159 Acknowledgements 169 Curriculum Vitae 171 List of publications 173 General Introduction 10 Chapter 1 General Introduction Preview Chromosomes in the nucleus of cells contain all the information a living organism needs to carry out its life processes. Chromosomes are made up of four different nucleotides. These four molecules are comprised of a deoxyribose backbone with one of four (adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), thymine (T)) nitrogenous bases attached. Different combinations of these four bases make up genes, which encode proteins, the building blocks required to “run” a cell. Each human cell contains about 6 billion base-pairs, which equals about 2 meters in length. This poses two problems: 1) How does two meters of DNA fit in a 5-20 micrometer (a millionth of a meter) large nucleus? 2) If all cells have the same material, how does the one cell becomes muscle, whereas another cell constitutes an eyelash? The answer, which also happened to be the subject of my thesis, is chromatin. Chromatin The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome. Nucleosomes constitute the basic unit of chromatin. One nucleosome is made up of 8 histone proteins, two copies of each H2A, H2B, H3 and H4, around which are wrapped 147 base pairs of DNA, in 1 3/4 left-handed superhelical turns (Finch et al., 1977). In mild physiological conditions, histone H3 and H4 form a tetramer that lays at the center of the nucleosome with a H2A and H2B dimer at either side (Klug et al., 1980; Arends et al., 1991). The nucleosome plus the fifth histone H1, has been termed the chromatosome (for a review see Kornberg, 1999). Only one copy of histone H1 associates with the nucleosome and its association is not required for its constitution (Kornberg 1974). Binding of H1 to both the major groove of the nucleosome dyad and the minor groove of the linker DNA protects another 20bp of DNA (beyond the core particles 147bp) against micrococcal nuclease digestion (Noll and Kornberg 1977; Simpson 1978). The linker DNA is the “free” DNA of variable length between two nucleosomes (Spadafora et al., 1976). Based on the formation of what has been called “superstructures” upon addition of H1 to the nucleosome, H1 is believed to stabilize General Introduction 11 the nucleosome and to facilitate the formation of higher order chromatin structures (Thoma et al., 1979; Ramakrishnan et al., 1997; Bednar et al., 1998). Higher order chromatin structures In cells chromatin comes in two varieties, euchromatin and heterochromatin. Euchromatin is considered an open chromatin structure, whereas heterochromatin represents a highly condensed inaccessible state. Both states can be defined by the presence of distinct chromatin interacting proteins and posttranslational modifications (PTMs) (for a review see Huisinga et al., 2006). Euchromatin is also regarded as active chromatin with most genes and regulatory regions found in euchromatic regions. Heterochromatin is characteristic of gene-poor regions such as telomeres and centromeres. One can visualize heterochromatin by its distinctive bright staining with interchelating dyes such as DAPI, or by its high electron density with electron microscopy. The structure of heterochromatin is believed to be packaged in a compact regular 30nm fiber (see below) whereas euchromatin has a more discontinues nature as judged by its slower sedimentation speed in sucrose gradients (Gilbert and Allan, 2001). Wrapping DNA in nucleosomes is the first degree of compaction. The second step in chromatin condensation is the less characterized 30nm fiber formation. The 30nm fiber is composed of a tandom array of nucleosomes folded in a condensed higher order structure (Gilbert and Rasahoye, 2005). Formation of the fiber is believed to involve stabilization of the linker histone H1 and the unstructured N- terminal tails that are found to stick out from the nucleosome particle (Luger et al., 1997). An interaction has been observed between the N-terminal tail of histone H4 with the flat face surface of the H2A-H2B histone dimer of an adjacent nucleosome, suggestive of a role of this tail in across nucleosome higher-order chromatin formation (Schwartz et al., 1996; Luger et al.,1997). Interestingly, in line with this observation, fully compacted chromatin fibers can be obtained with any of the histone tails deleted except for the histone H4 N-terminus. More specifically the interaction is mediated by an interaction of the positively charged lysine-rich residues 14-19 with negatively charged acidic residues on the H2A-H2B dimer coined the “acidic patch” (Luger et al., 1997; Suto et al., 2000; Dorigo et al., 2003). The importance of this 12 Chapter 1 interaction was further highlighted by the finding that eukaryotic cells have devised a way to change the nature of the acidic patch, by the incorporation of the histone variants H2A.Z and H2ABbd (Bar body deficient). H2A.Z increases, whereas H2Abbd reduces the acidic character of the acidic patch thereby respectively stabilizing and destabilizing the inter-nucleosome interactions (Clakson et al., 1999; Chatwick and Willard 2001 and discussed below). As the N-terminal histone tails are susceptible to a wide range of covalent PTMs, another way of changing this interaction is by neutralization of the positive charge on the H4 N-tail by acetylation (discussed below). Normally interphase cellular chromatin is found as a 30nm fiber (Langmore and Schutt, 1980), Originally the histone linker H1 was placed on the inside of the 30nm fiber with the linker DNA connecting two consecutive nucleosomes within the same stack. Per turn 6-8 nucleosomes coil around a central cavity constituting the superhelix. The formation of such a superhelix is termed a one-start helix (Widom and Klug, 1985). In contrast, in the two-start model the linker DNA is found on the outside of the superhelix connecting nucleosomes of consecutive stacks (Woodcock et al., 1984). Recently, an elegant study showed that most likely the 30nm fiber forms a two-step helix (Dorigo et al., 2004). The authors use the recently identified interaction between the acidic patch and the histone H4 tail to select a pair of cystein- replacement mutants that would allow stabilization (by di-sulfite bridges) of the 30nm fiber. Such a fiber was prone to digestion by a specific restriction enzyme at a site present in the linker DNA, showing that the linker-DNA is found on the outside of the superhelix. Moreover, restriction of the linker DNA of a 10 or 12 nucleosomal repeats resulted in two products of 5 or 6 nucleosomes respectively, explanatory of a two step model with stacks formed by disulfite cross-links and linker DNA connecting nucleosomes of two adjacent stacks (Dorigo et al., 2004). Although at low-angle-X-ray diffraction most of the chromatin appears as 30nm fibers, larger structures of 60-130nm fibers have also been observed by EM. These structures, (termed “chromonema”) are actual fibers most probably comprised of higher order compaction of 30nm fibers (Belmont and Bruce, 1994). The authors estimate that the formation of these “chromonema” results in a 160-1000 compaction. Maximum compaction the two meters of DNA (in interphase cells) thus will result in 2000^m of “chromonema” to fit in a 2-20^m small nucleus.
Recommended publications
  • Transcriptional Regulation Constrains the Organization of Genes on Eukaryotic Chromosomes
    Transcriptional regulation constrains the organization of genes on eukaryotic chromosomes Sarath Chandra Janga*†, Julio Collado-Vides‡, and M. Madan Babu*† *Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QH, United Kingdom; and ‡Programa de Genomica Computacional, Centro de Ciencias Genomicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apartado Postal 565-A, Av Universidad, Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62100 Mexico D.F., Mexico Edited by Aaron Klug, Medical Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and approved August 21, 2008 (received for review July 1, 2008) Genetic material in eukaryotes is tightly packaged in a hierarchical organization of genes across the different eukaryotic chromosomes. manner into multiple linear chromosomes within the nucleus. This becomes particularly interesting in the light of a recent work Although it is known that eukaryotic transcriptional regulation is that demonstrated that tuning the expression level of a single gene complex and requires an intricate coordination of several molec- could provide an enormous fitness advantage to an individual in a ular events both in space and time, whether the complexity of this population of cells (12). Thus, one could extrapolate that optimi- process constrains genome organization is still unknown. Here, we zation of transcriptional regulation on a global scale, such as the present evidence for the existence of a higher-order organization efficient expression of relevant genes under specific conditions, of genes across and within chromosomes that is constrained by would have significant advantage on the fitness of an individual in transcriptional regulation. In particular, we reveal that the target a genetically heterogeneous population. genes (TGs) of transcription factors (TFs) for the yeast, Saccharo- Although several studies have reported that genes with similar myces cerevisiae, are encoded in a highly ordered manner both expression patterns cluster on the genome and that gene order is across and within the 16 chromosomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1: Introduction
    The role of lamin A and emerin in mediating genome organisation A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Lauren Sarah Godwin School of Health Sciences and Social Care Brunel University July 2010 Abstract The nuclear matrix (NM) is proposed to be a permanent network of core filaments underlying thicker fibres, present regardless of transcriptional activity. It is found to be both RNA and protein rich; indeed, numerous important nuclear proteins are components of the structure. In addition to mediating the organisation of entire chromosomes, the NM has also been demonstrated to tether telomeres via their TTAGGG repeats. In order to examine telomeric interactions with the NM, a technique known as the DNA halo preparation has been employed. Regions of DNA that are tightly attached to the structure are found within a so-called residual nucleus, while those sequences forming lesser associations produce a halo of DNA. Coupled with various FISH methodologies, this technique allowed the anchorage of genomic regions by the NM, to be analysed. In normal fibroblasts, the majority of chromosomes and telomeres were extensively anchored to the NM. Such interactions did not vary significantly in proliferating and senescent nuclei. However, a decrease in NM-associated telomeres was detected in quiescence. Since lamin A is an integral component of the NM, it seemed pertinent to examine chromosome and telomere NM-anchorage in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome (HGPS) fibroblasts, which contain mutant forms of lamin A. Indeed, genome tethering by the NM was perturbed in HGPS. In immortalised HGPS fibroblasts, this disrupted anchorage appeared to be rescued; the implications of this finding will be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Pore Proteins and the Control of Genome Functions
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 30, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW Nuclear pore proteins and the control of genome functions Arkaitz Ibarra and Martin W. Hetzer Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037, USA Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are composed of several Cytoplasmic filaments are mainly formed by Nup358/ copies of ~30 different proteins called nucleoporins (Nups). RanBP2, Nup214, and Nup88, while the nuclear basket is NPCs penetrate the nuclear envelope (NE) and regulate the composed of Nup153 and Tpr (Fig. 1; for Nup othologs, see nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of macromolecules. Beyond Rothballer and Kutay 2012). this vital role, NPC components influence genome func- The selective access of regulatory factors into the tions in a transport-independent manner. Nups play an nucleus and export of specific RNA molecules mediated evolutionarily conserved role in gene expression regulation by the NPC is required for the accurate progression of most that, in metazoans, extends into the nuclear interior. major cellular processes. However, our perception of Additionally, in proliferative cells, Nups play a crucial role the NPC components is rapidly evolving, as accumulating in genome integrity maintenance and mitotic progression. evidence indicates that they can also directly impact Here we discuss genome-related functions of Nups and DNA metabolism by genome-related functions (Liang their impact on essential DNA metabolism processes such and Hetzer 2011). Among these, one of the most remark- as transcription, chromosome duplication, and segregation. able and well-conserved roles of Nups is to associate with specific target genes to regulate their transcriptional activity (Casolari et al.
    [Show full text]
  • O-Fucosylated Glycoproteins Form Assemblies in Close Proximity to the Nuclear Pore Complexes of Toxoplasma Gondii
    O-fucosylated glycoproteins form assemblies in close proximity to the nuclear pore complexes of Toxoplasma gondii Giulia Bandinia, John R. Hasericka,b, Edwin Motaria,b,1, Dinkorma T. Ouologuemc, Sebastian Louridod, David S. Roosc, Catherine E. Costellob, Phillips W. Robbinsa,2, and John Samuelsona,2 aDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Boston University Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; bDepartment of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118; cDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and dWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142 Contributed by Phillips W. Robbins, August 19, 2016 (sent for review June 8, 2016; reviewed by Richard Cummings and John A. Hanover) Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular parasite that causes dissem- (FG-Nups) and a putative Nup54 can be predicted by primary inated infections in fetuses and immunocompromised individuals. sequence homology (20). Although gene regulation is important for parasite differentiation Here we report the discovery of numerous assemblies of and pathogenesis, little is known about protein organization in O-fucosylated proteins that associate with the nuclear membrane the nucleus. Here we show that the fucose-binding Aleuria aurantia near the NPCs. These results improve our understanding of the ar- lectin (AAL) binds to numerous punctate structures in the nuclei of chitecture of the T. gondii nuclear periphery and highlight O-fuco- tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites but not oocysts. AAL also sylation as a PTM involved in assemblies associated with the NPC. binds to Hammondia and Neospora nuclei but not to more distantly Results related apicomplexans. Analyses of the AAL-enriched fraction indi- cate that AAL binds O-linked fucose added to Ser/Thr residues pre- The Fucose-Binding Aleuria aurantia Lectin Labels the Nuclei of T.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives
    FOCUS ON MECHANOTRANSDUCTION PERSPECTIVES network that can promote coordinated OPINION changes in cell, cytoskeletal and nuclear struc- ture in response to mechanical distortion14 Mechanotransduction at a (FIG. 1a). (Herein, the term hard-wired refers to cytoskeletal structures that are stable enough distance: mechanically coupling the as interconnected units to resist mechanical stresses and thereby maintain shape stabil- ity, even though they undergo continuous extracellular matrix with the nucleus dynamic remodelling at the molecular level.) This model takes into account the observa- Ning Wang, Jessica D. Tytell and Donald E. Ingber tion that individual cytoskeletal filaments can bear significant tensile and compressive loads Abstract | Research in cellular mechanotransduction often focuses on how in living cells because their structural integrity extracellular physical forces are converted into chemical signals at the cell surface. is maintained for longer than the turnover However, mechanical forces that are exerted on surface-adhesion receptors, such time of individual protein monomers15–17. as integrins and cadherins, are also channelled along cytoskeletal filaments and Key to the cellular tensegrity model is concentrated at distant sites in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Here, we explore the the idea that overall cell-shape stability and long-distance force transfer are governed by molecular mechanisms by which forces might act at a distance to induce the level of isometric tension, or ‘prestress’, mechanochemical conversion in the nucleus and alter gene activities. in the cytoskeleton that is generated through the establishment of a force balance between Mechanical forces influence the growth and For example, endothelial cells sense fluid opposing structural elements (that is, micro- shape of virtually every tissue and organ in shear through a cell–cell junctional com- tubules, contractile microfilaments and our bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • New Activities of the Nuclear Pore Complexes
    cells Editorial New Activities of the Nuclear Pore Complexes Richard W. Wong 1,2,3 1 WPI-Nano Life Science Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan; [email protected] 2 Graduate School of Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan 3 Cell-Bionomics Research Unit, Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan Abstract: Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) at the surface of nuclear membranes play a critical role in regulating the transport of both small molecules and macromolecules between the cell nucleus and cytoplasm via their multilayered spiderweb-like central channel. During mitosis, nuclear envelope breakdown leads to the rapid disintegration of NPCs, allowing some NPC proteins to play crucial roles in the kinetochore structure, spindle bipolarity, and centrosome homeostasis. The aberrant functioning of nucleoporins (Nups) and NPCs has been associated with autoimmune diseases, viral infections, neurological diseases, cardiomyopathies, and cancers, especially leukemia. This Special Issue highlights several new contributions to the understanding of NPC proteostasis. Keywords: nuclear pore complex; nanomedicine; liquid–liquid phase separation; biomacromolecule; HS-AFM; nucleoporin; nanoimaging The nuclear pore complex (NPC) [1–3] is a nanoscale gatekeeper with a central, se- lective, cobweb-like barrier composed mainly of nucleoporins (Nups), which comprise intrinsically disordered (non-structured) regions (IDRs) with phenylalanine–glycine (FG) motifs (FG-Nups) [4–8]. A fully assembled NPC in vertebrates contains multiple copies of approximately 30 different Nups and has an estimated molecular mass of 120 MDa [9]. Citation: Wong, R.W. New Activities Despite our knowledge of the NPC structure, the molecular mechanisms underlying of the Nuclear Pore Complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Repositioning Within the Cell Nucleus Is Not Random and Is Determined by Its Genomic Neighborhood Jost Et Al
    Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood Jost et al. Jost et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin (2015) 8:36 DOI 10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5 Jost et al. Epigenetics & Chromatin (2015) 8:36 DOI 10.1186/s13072-015-0025-5 RESEARCH Open Access Gene repositioning within the cell nucleus is not random and is determined by its genomic neighborhood K. Laurence Jost1†, Bianca Bertulat1†, Alexander Rapp1, Alessandro Brero2, Tanja Hardt2, Petra Domaing2, Claudia Gösele2, Herbert Schulz2, Norbert Hübner2 and M. Cristina Cardoso1* Abstract Background: Heterochromatin has been reported to be a major silencing compartment during development and differentiation. Prominent heterochromatin compartments are located at the nuclear periphery and inside the nucleus (e.g., pericentric heterochromatin). Whether the position of a gene in relation to some or all heterochromatin compartments matters remains a matter of debate, which we have addressed in this study. Answering this question demanded solving the technical challenges of 3D measurements and the large-scale morphological changes accom- panying cellular differentiation. Results: Here, we investigated the proximity effects of the nuclear periphery and pericentric heterochromatin on gene expression and additionally considered the effect of neighboring genomic features on a gene’s nuclear position. Using a well-established myogenic in vitro differentiation system and a differentiation-independent heterochromatin remodeling system dependent on ectopic MeCP2 expression, we first identified genes with statistically significant expression changes by transcriptional profiling. We identified nuclear gene positions by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by 3D distance measurements toward constitutive and facultative heterochromatin domains. Single-cell-based normalization enabled us to acquire morphologically unbiased data and we finally correlated changes in gene positioning to changes in transcriptional profiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpesviral Replication Compartments Move and Coalesce at Nuclear
    Herpesviral replication compartments move and PNAS PLUS coalesce at nuclear speckles to enhance export of viral late mRNA Lynne Changa, William J. Godinezb, Il-Han Kimb, Marco Tektonidisb, Primal de Lanerollec, Roland Eilsb, Karl Rohrb, and David M. Knipea,1 aDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; bDepartment of Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Biomedical Computer Vision Group, BIOQUANT, Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; and cDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612 Edited* by John J. Mekalanos, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved April 11, 2011 (received for review March 1, 2011) The role of the intranuclear movement of chromatin in gene Viruses are simple genetic entities and have often provided expression is not well-understood. Herpes simplex virus forms precise probes of cellular molecular mechanisms. Viral chro- replication compartments (RCs) in infected cell nuclei as sites of mosomes of herpes simplex virus (HSV) are replicated and un- viral DNA replication and late gene transcription. These structures dergo late transcription in intranuclear structures called replica- develop from small compartments that grow in size, move, and tion compartments (RCs) (15), which are known to move and coalesce. Quantitative analysis of RC trajectories, derived from 4D coalesce in nuclei of infected cells during the course of infection images, shows that most RCs move by directed motion. Directed (16, 17). The function and mechanism of RC movement are movement is impaired in the presence of actin and myosin inhibitors unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Budding Yeast Nucleus
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The Budding Yeast Nucleus Angela Taddei1,2, Heiko Schober3, and Susan M. Gasser3 1UMR 218, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France 2Institut Curie-Section de Recherche, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France 3Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Maulbeerstrasse 66, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland Correspondence: [email protected] The budding yeast nucleus, like those of other eukaryotic species, is highly organized with respect to both chromosomal sequences and enzymatic activities. At the nuclear periphery interactions of nuclear pores with chromatin, mRNA, and transport factors promote efficient gene expression, whereas centromeres, telomeres, and silent chromatin are clustered and anchored away from pores. Internal nuclear organization appears to be function-dependent, reflecting localized sites for tRNA transcription, rDNA transcription, ribosome assembly, and DNA repair. Recent advances have identified new proteins involved in the positioning of chromatin and have allowed testing of the functional role of higher-order chromatin organ- ization. The unequal distribution of silent information regulatory factors and histone modify- ing enzymes, which arises in part from the juxtaposition of telomeric repeats, has been shown to influence chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression. Other localization events sup- press unwanted recombination. These findings highlight the contribution budding yeast gen- etics and cytology have made to dissecting the functional role of nuclear structure. ith 16 chromosomes and a closed mitosis, or sites of DNA repair by homologous recombi- Wthe budding yeast nucleus provides an nation (Lamond and Spector 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Periphery in Genome Regulation
    REVIEWS Coaching from the sidelines: the nuclear periphery in genome regulation Abigail Buchwalter1,2,3, Jeanae M. Kaneshiro1 and Martin W. Hetzer1* Abstract | The genome is packaged and organized nonrandomly within the 3D space of the nucleus to promote efficient gene expression and to faithfully maintain silencing of heterochromatin. The genome is enclosed within the nucleus by the nuclear envelope membrane, which contains a set of proteins that actively participate in chromatin organization and gene regulation. Technological advances are providing views of genome organization at unprecedented resolution and are beginning to reveal the ways that cells co-opt the structures of the nuclear periphery for nuclear organization and gene regulation. These genome regulatory roles of proteins of the nuclear periphery have important influences on development, disease and ageing. HiC Early cytological experiments determined that the cell Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) are large multiprotein A technique used to study nucleus — the largest, most readily observed subcellular assemblies that perforate the nuclear envelope mem- genome organization by structure — contains the genetic determinants that brane and control the passage of material between the identifying chromosomal direct the development of functional tissues1. We now nucleus and cytoplasm (reviewed in REF.9). HiC analyses interactions both in cis and in trans throughout the entire know that the eukaryotic nucleus contains the major- indicate that the B compartment preferentially occupies genome. ity of the genetic information of the cell in the form of the nuclear periphery, whereas the A compartment discrete chromosomes2, which occupy distinct, non- is more centrally located within the nucleus10. As vis- Nuclear periphery randomly positioned territories within the nucleus3.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Nucleic Acid Binding Activity of the Nucleoporin Nup157
    Structure and nucleic acid binding activity of the nucleoporin Nup157 Hyuk-Soo Seo1,2, Bartlomiej J. Blus1, Nina Z. Jankovic, and Günter Blobel2 Laboratory of Cell Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065 Contributed by Günter Blobel, September 2, 2013 (sent for review August 6, 2013) At the center of the nuclear pore complex (NPC) is a uniquely versatile three constricted rings was proposed, resulting in ∼30 nm changes central transport channel. Structural analyses of distinct segments in the diameter of the central transport channel. (“protomers”) of the three “channel” nucleoporins yielded a model Other than structurally and functionally distinguishing between for how this channel is constructed. Its principal feature is a midplane dilated and constricted forms of the nuclear pore, this model has ring that can undergo regulated diameter changes of as much as an implications for the function of a large network of nups adjacent to estimated 30 nm. To better understand how a family of “adaptor” the central channel that constitute the symmetric core of the NPC. nucleoporins—concentrically surrounding this channel—might cush- Only the channel nups “line” the channel wall, whereas the ion these huge structural changes, we determined the crystal struc- concentrically surrounding nups, linked to each other in a Rube ture of one adaptor nucleoporin, Nup157. Here, we show that a Goldberg-like network, are envisioned to accommodate and or- recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nup157 protomer, repre- chestrate the vast shape and diameter changes of the central channel. – senting two-thirds of Nup157 (residues 70 893), folds into a This involves not only conformational plasticity of individual nups, β α seven-bladed -propeller followed by an -helical domain, which but likely requires reversible disruptions of interacting sites between together form a C-shaped architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrachromosomal Circular DNA: Current Knowledge and Implications for CNS Aging and Neurodegeneration
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Extrachromosomal Circular DNA: Current Knowledge and Implications for CNS Aging and Neurodegeneration Quratul Ain 1, Christian Schmeer 1,2 , Diane Wengerodt 1, Otto W. Witte 1,2 and Alexandra Kretz 1,2,* 1 Hans-Berger Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Thuringia, Germany; [email protected] (Q.A.); [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (D.W.); [email protected] (O.W.W.) 2 Jena Center for Healthy Ageing, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Thuringia, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 2 March 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 2 April 2020 Abstract: Still unresolved is the question of how a lifetime accumulation of somatic gene copy number alterations impact organ functionality and aging and age-related pathologies. Such an issue appears particularly relevant in the broadly post-mitotic central nervous system (CNS), where non-replicative neurons are restricted in DNA-repair choices and are prone to accumulate DNA damage, as they remain unreplaced over a lifetime. Both DNA injuries and consecutive DNA-repair strategies are processes that can evoke extrachromosomal circular DNA species, apparently from either part of the genome. Due to their capacity to amplify gene copies and related transcripts, the individual cellular load of extrachromosomal circular DNAs will contribute to a dynamic pool of additional coding and regulatory chromatin elements. Analogous to tumor tissues, where the mosaicism of circular DNAs plays a well-characterized role in oncogene plasticity and drug resistance, we suggest involvement of the “circulome” also in the CNS.
    [Show full text]