Vocal-Acoustic Pathways in a Teleost Fish

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vocal-Acoustic Pathways in a Teleost Fish The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1994, 74(7): 4025AO39 Vocal-Acoustic Pathways in a Teleost Fish Andrew H. Bass,‘J Margaret A. Marchaterre,is2 and Robert Baker3 ‘Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, 2Bodega Marine Laboratory, University of California, Bodega Bay, California 94923, and 3Department of Physiology and Biophysics, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016 Many teleost fish generate acoustic signals for vocal com- of marine fishes,sound is generatedby the contraction of paired munication by the synchronized, high-frequency contraction skeletal, sonic musclesattached to the lateral walls of the swim of skeletal, sonic muscles. In midshipman, eight groups of bladder (SM, Fig. lA,B). From a comparative, evolutionary brainstem neurons were distinguished after biocytin appli- perspectivewith tetrapods, it is appropriate to classify the acous- cation to the sonic nerve that, we propose, represent the tic signalsofthese fish as vocalizations. Tetrapods uselaryngeal, entire vocal motor circuit. Biocytin-filled terminals were ubiq- syringeal, and tongue musculatureto vocalize. Thesesonic mus- uitous within all areas containing labeled neurons and, to- cles share a number of traits with those of batrachoidid fishes gether with ultrastructural evidence, suggested a serial, including the production of species-and sex-typical acoustic transneuronal transport at synaptic sites between at least signals,differentiation as skeletal musclesoriginating from oc- three neuronal groups. The most intensely labeled neurons cipital somites, and innervation by homologous sets of moto- were positioned in the caudal brainstem and included a pre- neurons: syringeal and tongue musclesare innervated by the viously characterized pacemaker-motoneuron circuit and a hypoglossalmotor nucleus, which is considered a homolog of newly recognized ventral medullary nucleus that itself gave the batrachoidid sonic motor nucleus (review: Bass, 1989). rise to extensive commissural and lateral brainstem bundles In the plainfin midshipman (Povichthys notutus), a represen- linking the pacemaker circuitry to the rostra1 brainstem. Five tative batrachoidid, the sonic motor nucleus (SMN, Fig. 1C) additional groups formed a column rostrally within the medial has a midline position at the caudal end of the brainstem and brainstem adjacent to eighth nerve (octaval)-recipient nuclei innervates the ipsilateral muscle via occipital nerve roots (OC, largely presumed to be acoustic. This column extended dor- Fig. 1C). So far, extensive intracellular recording and staining sally up to the ventricular cell layer and as far anterior as studies in midshipman have identified individual pacemaker midbrain isthmal levels. The best-defined group was in the neurons, which lie adjacent to the sonic motor nucleus(PN, Fig. octaval efferent nucleus that directly innervates the sacculus 1C), as the only source of direct synaptic input onto sonic mo- that is considered the auditory division of the inner ear. Sac- toneurons (Bassand Baker, 1990). Pacemakerneurons set the cular afferents and neurons throughout the medial column dischargefrequency ofthe motoneurons, which then determines were also filled after biocytin application to the saccular the contraction rate ofthe musclesand, in turn, the fundamental nerve. This vocal-acoustic network overlaps low-threshold, frequency of vocalizations. Individual pacemaker neurons in- electrical stimulation sites in the rostra1 brainstem that elicit nervate both motor nuclei, consistent with the hypothesis that vocalizations. The medial column must therefore be the or- their role is to synchronize motoneuron firing that leads to the igin of the descending pathway controlling activation of the simultaneous contraction of both musclesat the fundamental vocal pacemaker circuitry and likely forms the basis for frequency. Thus, there is a direct relationship betweenthe rhyth- acoustically elicited vocalizations. We suggest this network, mic, patterned output of a brainstem pacemakercircuit and the together with input from the pacemaker circuitry, is also the physical attributes of species-and sex-typical vocalizations. origin of a vocal-related, corollary discharge to acoustic nu- One long-term goal of vocal motor studiesin both anamniotes clei. Direct links between vocal and acoustic brain regions and amniotes has been to identify the neurons controlling the are thus traits common to aquatic and terrestrial vertebrates. rhythmic discharge of the vocal pacemaker circuitry. While a [Key words: brainstem, pacemaker circuit, vocalization, number of studies in batrachoidid fishes had used electrical acoustic, corollary discharge] stimulation to elicit vocalizations at sitesdistant from the motor nucleus, the positions of neuronal groups forming a descending Teleost fishesgenerate acoustic communication signalsimpor- pathway were unknown (review: Bass and Baker, 1991). As tant to both their survivorship and reproductive success(re- mentioned above, intracellular studies have so far identified views: Bass, 1990, 1992). Among Batrachoidiformes, an order individual pacemaker neurons as providing the sole input to sonic motoneurons. Given the limitations of single-cell studies in delineating the complete extent and location of neuronswith- Received Aug. 18, 1993; revised Dec. 16, 1993; accepted Dec. 21, 1993. in a circuit, a potential transneuronal tracer was sought to both This work was supported from the National Science Foundation (BNS8708559, map the entire complement of pacemakerneurons and identify 902 1563) and the National Institutes of Health (NS 13742). Thanks to the Bodeaa Marine Laboratory for logistical support, Dr. h. Weiser’ for assistance with tie their afferents. Biocytin, a complex of biotin and lysine, was figures, and Drs. H. Baker, M. Braford Jr., and C. McCormick for reading and chosen as a candidate transneuronal tracer for a number of commenting on the manuscript. Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Andrew H. Bass, Section of Neu- reasons,foremost among which were its low molecular weight robiology and Behavior, Mudd Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. (372), diffusion throughout the soma-dendritic-axonal com- Copyright 0 1994 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/94/144025-15$05.00/O partments of neurons, and high affinity for avidin, which made 4026 Bass et al. * Vocal-Acoustic Circuit in Teleost Fish Figure 1. Overview of vocal motor system of midshipman. A, Line drawing of a lateral view of a plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notutus) showing the position of the swim bladder (SB) and attached sonic muscles (SM) at the level of the pelvic fin (P). B, Line drawing of a ventral view ofa male; the testes(r) have been deflected to show the paired sonic muscles (SA4) attached to the swim bladder’s walls. C, A schematic reconstruction superimposed on a dorsal view of the midshipman’s brain showing the positions of the eight groups of biocytin-filled neurons labeled following biocytin labeling of the sonic nerve at the level of the swim bladder (BC*, B). The approximate anterior-posterior extent of the line drawings presented in Figures 4, 6, and 8 is indicated. AC, anterior canal ampulla; C, cerebellum; DT, dorsal tegmental group; HC, horizontal canal ampulla; HP, hindbrain paraventricular group; ZP, isthmal paraventricular group; M, midbrain; OB, olfactory bulb; OL, olfactory nerve; OC, occipital nerves; ON, optic nerve; PLLN, posterior lateral line nerve; PN, pacemaker neurons; SA, saccular otolith; SE, statoacoustic efferent nucleus; SMN, sonic motor nucleus; SP, spinal cord; T, telencephalon; V, trigeminal nerve; VM, ventral medullary nucleus; VT, ventral tegmental group; VIII, eighth nerve; IX, glossopharyngeal nerve; I”, vagus nerve. Scale bar, 1 mm. it optimally suited for use with a variety of immunocytochem- cal systems (Suga and Shimozawa, 1974; Bell, 1989; Metzner, ical markers (Horikawa and Armstrong, 1988). Surprisingly, 1993). Finally, as reasoned here, if the entire complement of biocytin labeling of the midshipman’s sonic nerve at the level neurons in a vertebrate circuit can be delineated by a single of the swim bladder delineated the full extent of the pacemaker application of a tracer to its most peripheral element, a motor circuitry and, more impressively, demonstrated a linkage be- or sensory nerve, then this technique has obvious advantages tween that circuitry and acoustic regions ofthe rostra1 brainstem over most other tract-tracing methqdologies, especially for small, extending up to midbrain levels. A vocal-acoustic linkage was nonmammalian vertebrates. The comprehensive mapping sug- further implied when, after biocytin labeling of the eighth nerve, gested here by biocytin provides an immediate guide to the which in,nervates the inner ear, transneuronal transport resulted causal analysis of a neuronal network, like a vocal motor circuit, in the filling of neurons that were also labeled via the sonic determining the execution of a specific behavior, such as vo- nerve. calizations. Comparisons with neurophysiological studies indicate this Portions of these results were reported earlier (Bass et al., vocal-acoustic network must include the pathway for descend- 1992). ing control of the vocal pacemaker circuit, which, in part, could be activated by primary or higher-order acoustic inputs. We Materials and Methods suggest that this vocal-acoustic circuit also includes a corollary This study included both adult and juvenile midshipman fish.
Recommended publications
  • Projections from the Trigeminal Nuclear Complex to the Cochlear Nuclei: a Retrograde and Anterograde Tracing Study in the Guinea Pig
    Journal of Neuroscience Research 78:901–907 (2004) Projections From the Trigeminal Nuclear Complex to the Cochlear Nuclei: a Retrograde and Anterograde Tracing Study in the Guinea Pig Jianxun Zhou and Susan Shore* Department of Otolaryngology and Kresge Hearing Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan In addition to input from auditory centers, the cochlear cuneate nucleus innervation of cochlear nucleus has been nucleus (CN) receives inputs from nonauditory centers, hypothesized to convey information about head and pinna including the trigeminal sensory complex. The detailed position for the purpose of localizing a sound source in anatomy, however, and the functional implications of the space (Young et al., 1995). In addition, interactions be- nonauditory innervation of the auditory system are not tween somatosensory and auditory systems have been fully understood. We demonstrated previously that the linked increasingly to phantom sound perception, also trigeminal ganglion projects to CN, with terminal labeling known as tinnitus. This is demonstrated in the observa- most dense in the marginal cell area and secondarily in tions that injuries of the head and neck region can lead to the magnocellular area of the ventral cochlear nucleus the onset of tinnitus in patients with no hearing loss (VCN). We continue this line of study by investigating the (Lockwood et al., 1998). projection from the spinal trigeminal nucleus to CN in We demonstrated previously projections from the guinea pig. After injections of the retrograde tracers Flu- trigeminal ganglion to CN in guinea pigs (Shore et al., oroGold or biotinylated dextran amine (BDA) in VCN, 2000). Terminal labeling of trigeminal ganglion projec- labeled cells were found in the spinal trigeminal nuclei, tions to the CN was found to be most dense in the most densely in the pars interpolaris and pars caudalis marginal cell area and secondarily in the magnocellular with ipsilateral dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • University International
    INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necescary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatotopic Organization of Perioral Musculature Innervation Within the Pig Facial Motor Nucleus
    Original Paper Brain Behav Evol 2005;66:22–34 Received: September 20, 2004 Returned for revision: November 10, 2004 DOI: 10.1159/000085045 Accepted after revision: December 7, 2004 Published online: April 8, 2005 Somatotopic Organization of Perioral Musculature Innervation within the Pig Facial Motor Nucleus Christopher D. Marshall a Ron H. Hsu b Susan W. Herring c aTexas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, Tex., bDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., and cDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., USA Key Words pools of the lateral 4 of the 7 subnuclei of the facial motor Somatotopy W Innervation W Facial nucleus W Perioral nucleus. The motor neuron pools of the perioral muscles muscles W Orbicularis oris W Buccinator W Mammals were generally segregated from motoneurons innervat- ing other facial muscles of the rostrum. However, motor neuron pools were not confined to single nuclei but Abstract instead spanned across 3–4 subnuclei. Perioral muscle The orbicularis oris and buccinator muscles of mammals motor neuron pools overlapped but were organized so- form an important subset of the facial musculature, the matotopically. Motor neuron pools of portions of the perioral muscles. In many taxa, these muscles form a SOO overlapped greatly with each other but exhibited a robust muscular hydrostat capable of highly manipula- crude somatotopy within the SOO motor neuron pool. tive fine motor movements, likely accompanied by a spe- The large and somatotopically organized SOO motor cialized pattern of innervation. We conducted a retro- neuron pool in pigs suggests that the upper lip might be grade nerve-tracing study of cranial nerve (CN) VII in pigs more richly innervated than the other perioral muscles (Sus scrofa) to: (1) map the motor neuron pool distribu- and functionally divided.
    [Show full text]
  • Monosynaptic Premotor Circuit Tracing Reveals Neural Substrates for Oro-Motor Coordination
    1 Title 2 3 Monosynaptic Premotor Circuit Tracing Reveals Neural Substrates 4 for Oro-motor Coordination 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Authors and affiliations 12 13 Edward Stanek IV1, Steven Cheng1, Jun Takatoh1, Bao-Xia Han1, and Fan Wang1, 2 * 14 15 1. Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. 16 2. Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Corresponding author 23 24 *Fan Wang 25 Department of Neurobiology, Box 3209 26 Duke University Medical Center 27 Durham, NC 27710 28 Phone: 919-684-3682 29 e-mail: [email protected] 30 31 Number of pages: 59 32 Number of Figures: 10 33 Number of Movies: 4 34 Number of Tables: 2 35 Number of words, Abstract: 237 36 Number of words, Main Text: 5,168 1 37 ABSTRACT 38 39 Feeding behaviors require intricately coordinated activation among the muscles of the jaw, 40 tongue, and face, but the neural anatomical substrates underlying such coordination remain 41 unclear. Here we investigate whether the premotor circuitry of jaw and tongue motoneurons 42 contain elements for coordination. Using a modified monosynaptic rabies virus based 43 transsynaptic tracing strategy, we systematically mapped premotor neurons for the jaw-closing 44 masseter muscle and the tongue-protruding genioglossus muscle. The maps revealed that the two 45 groups of premotor neurons are distributed in regions implicated in rhythmogenesis, descending 46 motor control, and sensory feedback. Importantly, we discovered several premotor connection 47 configurations that are ideally suited for coordinating bilaterally symmetric jaw movements, and 48 for enabling co-activation of specific jaw, tongue, and facial muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Determination of the Primary Trigeminal Projections in Lampreys
    Brain Research, 163 (1979) 323-327 323 © Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press Experimental determination of the primary trigeminal projections in lampreys R. GLENN NORTHCUTT Division of Biological Sciences, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109 (U.S.A.) (Accepted November 9th, 1978) The trigeminal complex of lampreys, like that of anamniotic gnathostomes, consists of profundus and 'mandibulo 'mandibulomaxillary' branchesa, s. The pro- fundus branch possesses a distinct ganglion (supraorbital ganglion) separate from the ganglion (suboptical ganglion) of the 'mandibulomaxillary' brancheslL However, both ganglia send their processes into the medulla as a single trigeminal sensory root (Figs. 1A, 2A). The lamprey trigeminal complex differs from that of other anamniotes in that the anterior lateral line and facial ganglia are not closely associated with the trigeminal ganglia but are located beneath and within the optic capsule a,12. This separation clearly simplifies experimental analysis of the trigeminal projections, as the trigeminal ganglia can be lesioned or the sensory roots transected without damaging facial or lateralis inputs. Earlier studies claim that scattered lateral line receptors on the dorsal surface of the head are innervated by the trigeminal nerve~,~. This condition has not been reported for any other vertebrate and has been interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that a lateralis component existed ancestrally in each branchiomeric cranial nerve. It is also claimed that the trigeminal nerve in lampreys projects directly to the cerebellum, the octavolateralis area and the funicular nucleus (presumed precursor of the dorsal column nuclei4,6). This trigeminal projection pattern has been interpreted as supporting the claim that the dorsal column nuclei, octavolaterlis area and cerebellum arose from a single somatic sensory column, and that lampreys essentially retain that primitive condition6.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Anatomy of the Cranial Nerves Clinical Anatomy of the Cranial Nerves
    Clinical Anatomy of the Cranial Nerves Clinical Anatomy of the Cranial Nerves Paul Rea AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA First published 2014 Copyright r 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangement with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiation of the Bulbar Motor Nuclei and the Coincident Develop- Ment of Associated Root Fibers in the Rsbbit
    DIFFERENTIATION OF THE BULBAR MOTOR NUCLEI AND THE COINCIDENT DEVELOP- MENT OF ASSOCIATED ROOT FIBERS IN THE RSBBIT DONALD L. KIMMEL Department of Anatomy, University of Michigan,’ Aim Arbor THIRTY-ONE FIGURES CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................ 83 Material and methods ................................................ 84 General survey of the literature ....................................... 85 Description of material studied ........................................ 86 Somatic efferent component. Its central and peripheral development .... 86 The hypoglossal ............................................. 86 The abdueens ............................................... 96 Visceral efferent component. Its central and peripheral development .... 103 The vago-accessory ........................................... 103 The glossopharyngeal ........................................ 124 The facial .................................................. 129 The trigemiiial .............................................. 137 Geiicrxldisrussion .................................................... 143 INTRODUCTION This present study concerns itself primarily with the onto- genetic development of the nuclear centers of bulbar cranial nerves in the rabbit and with the embryonic and adult distri- butions of their branches. Its purpose is to show that the central development proceeds stage for stage with the pro- A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Model Accounting for the Symptom Cluster Triggered After an Acoustic Shock
    An Integrative Model Accounting for the Symptom Cluster Triggered After an Acoustic Shock Arnaud Noreña, Philippe Fournier, Alain Londero, Damien Ponsot, Nicolas Charpentier To cite this version: Arnaud Noreña, Philippe Fournier, Alain Londero, Damien Ponsot, Nicolas Charpentier. An Integra- tive Model Accounting for the Symptom Cluster Triggered After an Acoustic Shock. Trends in Hearing, SAGE Publications, 2018, 22, pp.233121651880172. 10.1177/2331216518801725. hal-02138904 HAL Id: hal-02138904 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02138904 Submitted on 4 Mar 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Innovations in Tinnitus Research: Review Trends in Hearing Volume 22: 1–18 ! The Author(s) 2018 An Integrative Model Accounting Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions for the Symptom Cluster Triggered DOI: 10.1177/2331216518801725 After an Acoustic Shock journals.sagepub.com/home/tia Arnaud J. Noren˜a1, Philippe Fournier1, Alain Londero2, Damien Ponsot3, and Nicolas Charpentier4 Abstract Acoustic shocks and traumas sometimes result in a cluster of debilitating symptoms, including tinnitus, hyperacusis, ear fullness and tension, dizziness, and pain in and outside the ear. The mechanisms underlying this large variety of symptoms remain elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Review SOMATOTOPY of the TRIGEMINAL COMPLEX: NERVE
    EUROMEDITERRANEAN BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL 2017,12 (37) 170–177 (FORMERLY: CAPSULA EBURNEA) Review SOMATOTOPY OF THE TRIGEMINAL COMPLEX: NERVE, GANGLION, NUCLEUS. Alessio Lipari, Luana Lipari, Francesco Carini, Aldo Gerbino, Elvira Farina. Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neurosciences. University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: This paper summarizes, in a modern fashion and with a number of molecular, functional and Received 30 August 2017 magnetic resonance imaging details, the main morphological data about the trigeminal complex Revised 18 October 2017 (i.e., trigeminal nerve, ganglion and nucleus). Indeed, this information is the basis to understand Accepted 22 November2017 pathophysiology and semiotics of diseases involving these anatomical structures. Keywords: © EuroMediterranean Biomedical Journal 2017 Trigeminal complex, nucleus, nerve, ganglion. conjunctiva, dorsum of the nose, mucous membranes of the nasal 1. Introduction vestibule and frontal sinus. The ophtalmic nerve is purely sensory or afferent in function. It supplies sensory branches to: the ciliary body, the Previous our study are regarding the somatotopy of the spinal nerve [1] cornea and the iris; the lacrimal gland and conjunctiva; portions of the and oculomotor complex [2], thus we study the somatotopy of trigeminal mucous membrane of the nasal cavity, sphenoidal sinus and frontal sinus; complex. The trigeminal nerve, V cranial nerve, has three branches: the skin of the eyebrow, eyelids, forehead, and nose; the tentorium ophthalmic nerve, maxillary nerve and mandibular nerve; it is a mixed cerebelli, dura mater and the posterior area of the falx cerebri [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Lab 3. Pons & Midbrain
    Lab 3. Pons & Midbrain Lesion Lessons Lesion 4.1 Anne T. Pasta i) Location ii) Signs/symptoms (Slice of Brain © 993 Univs. of Utah and Washington; E.C. Alvord, Jr., Univ. of Washington) iii) Cause: Lesion 4.2 Colin S. Terase i) Location ii) Signs/symptoms (Slice of Brain © 993 Univs. of Utah and Washington; M.Z. Jones, Michigan St. Univ.) iii) Cause: Medical Neuroscience 4– Pontine Level of the Facial Genu Locate and note the following: Basilar pons – massive ventral structure provides the most obvious change from previous med- ullary levels. Question classic • pontine gray - large nuclear groups in the basilar pons. Is the middle cerebellar peduncle composed – origin of the middle cerebellar peduncle of climbing or mossy • pontocerebellar axons - originate from pontine gray neurons and cross to form the fibers? middle cerebellar peduncle. • corticopontine axons- huge projection that terminates in the basilar pontine gray. • corticospinal tract axons – large bundles of axons surrounded by the basilar pontine gray. – course caudally to form the pyramids in the medulla. Pontine tegmentum • medial lemniscus - has now assumed a “horizontal” position and forms part of the border between the basilar pons and pontine tegmentum. Question classic • central tegmental tract - located just dorsally to the medial lemniscus. What sensory modali- – descends from the midbrain to the inferior olive. ties are carried by the • superior olivary nucleus - pale staining area lateral to the central tegmental tract. medial and lateral – gives rise to the efferent olivocochlear projection to the inner ear. lemnisci? • lateral lemniscus - lateral to the medial lemniscus. – composed of secondary auditory projections from the cochlear nuclei.
    [Show full text]
  • Topography and Cytoarchitecture of the Motor Nuclei in the Brainstem of Salamanders
    THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 278:181-194 (1988) Topography and Cytoarchitecture of the Motor Nuclei in the Brainstem of Salamanders GERHARD ROTH, RIISA NISHIKAWA, URSULA DICKE, AND DAVID B. WAKE Department of Biology, University of Bremen, 2800 Bremen 33, Federal Republic of Germany (G.R., U.D.); Museum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 (K.N., D.B.W.) ABSTRACT The organization of the motor nuclei of cranial nerves V (including mesencephalic nucleus), VI, VII, IX, and X is described from HRP-stained material (whole mounts and sections) for 25 species representing five fami- lies of salamanders, and the general topology of the brainstem is considered. Location and organization of the motor nuclei, cytoarchitecture of each nucleus, and target organs for nuclei and subnuclei are described. The trigeminal nucleus is separated distinctly from the facial and abducens nuclei and consists of two subnuclei. The abducens nucleus consists of two distinct subnuclei, one medial in location, the abducens proper, and the other lateral, the abducens accessorius. The facial nucleus has two subnu- clei, and in all but one species it is posterior to the genu facialis. The facial nucleus completely overlaps the glossopharyngeal nucleus and partially overlaps that of the vagus. In bolitoglossine plethodontid salamanders, all of which have highly specialized projectile tongues, the glossopharyngeal and vagus nuclei have moved rostrally to overlap extensively and intermin- gle with the anterior and posterior subnuclei of the facial nerve. In the bolitoglossines there is less organization of the cells of the brainstem nuclei: dendritic trunks are less parallel and projection fields are wider than in other salamanders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mesencephalic Trigeminal Nucleus Controls Food Intake and Body Weight Via Hindbrain POMC Projections
    nutrients Article The Mesencephalic Trigeminal Nucleus Controls Food Intake and Body Weight via Hindbrain POMC Projections Samantha M. Fortin 1 , Jack Chen 1, Harvey J. Grill 2 and Matthew R. Hayes 1,* 1 Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] (S.M.F.); [email protected] (J.C.) 2 Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus (Mes5) processes oral sensory–motor information, but its role in the control of energy balance remains unexplored. Here, using fluorescent in situ hybridization, we show that the Mes5 expresses the melanocortin-4 receptor. Consistent with MC4R activation in other areas of the brain, we found that Mes5 microinjection of the MC4R agonist melanotan-II (MTII) suppresses food intake and body weight in the mouse. Furthermore, NTS POMC-projecting neurons to the Mes5 can be chemogenetically activated to drive a suppression in food intake. Taken together, these findings highlight the Mes5 as a novel target of melanocortinergic control of food intake and body weight regulation, although elucidating the endogenous role of this circuit requires future study. While we observed the sufficiency of Mes5 MC4Rs for food intake and body weight suppression, these receptors do not appear to be necessary for food intake or body weight control. Collectively, the data presented here support the functional relevance of the NTS POMC to Mes5 projection pathway as a novel circuit that can be targeted to modulate food intake and body weight.
    [Show full text]