DOCSLIB.ORG

ALMANAC October 31, 1972

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ALMANAC October 31, 1972 IN THIS ISSUE " The Week of the Three Nobel Prizes " FACILITIES: Vance Hall, Levy Pavilion, Williams Hall " Revising Admissions for Undergraduates (Wood) Volume 19, Number 10October 31, 1972 " COUNCIL: Agenda " BULLETINS " DEATHS Published weekly by the University of Pennsylvania Museum and the Penn-Columbia Soccer Game at Franklin Field. Saturday they will hold a box lunch on College Hall Green before the Penn-Columbia Football Game. A survey last year showed that visits to classrooms were the most popular feature of the annual Parents Day sponsored by the University's Annual Giving Program. Page 2 The most disappointing feature: visits to classrooms where a class had been canceled without notice or where an exam was in progress instead of a lecture or discussion. This year, faculty are urgently asked to advise their students in advance if November 17 will not be a normal day. RESIDENTIAL LEARNING PROPOSALS: NOVEMBER 20 NEWS IN BRIEF Faculty members and others interested in planning and proposing living/learning projects for the academic year 1973- PRESIDENT/ PROVOSTS STAFF: DR. THACKRAY 74 must contact Mrs. Margo Marshall, Director of Residential in the Office of the Vice Provost for Dr. Arnold Thackray, Chairman and Associate Professor Programs Undergraduate Studies, November 20. The deadline for the of the History and Sociology of Science, has been named a by follow-up written is November 30. A committee will review Faculty Assistant to the President and the Provost. He joins proposals all and make its recommendations at the Dr. Robert Zemsky in that title and succeeds Dr. Renee Fox, proposals beginning of the who is now Chairman of Sociology. spring term. Dr. Thackray is Curator of the Edgar Fahs Smith Memorial Collection in the History of Chemistry. Harvard University From the AAUP: Press, which published his Atoms and Powers in 1970, will issue Dr. Thackray's John Dalton on November 17. He is currently at work on a study of the cultural uses of science Open Meeting: within industrializing Britain. Faculty Rights-and Grievances PRINTING PROCUREMENT: MRS. YEAGER What are the rights of a non-tenured faculty mem- ber? Do define these Auxiliary Services Director George Kidd Jr. has announced University regulations rights and What are the differ- the assignment of Mrs. Harriet Yeager as Director of Printing clearly comprehensively? ences between statements on the Procurement, effective immediately. She has headed the Uni- University subject and the statements of the American Association of versity Printing Office, which closes November 3. Professors? When members be- Mrs. Yeager's charge will be to insure consistent quality University faculty lieve that have been treated what re- and equitable costs for all printing work done for any Uni- they unfairly, course do have? Are the established versity budget; she will also authorize all University printing they procedures for and do work? bills for payment. Creation of the post is to allow the Uni- handling grievances adequate, they Should there be to the versity to use its full economic leverage to collective advan- special procedures protect of women and members of tage in the purchase of printing, Mr. Kidd said. rights minority groups? These are among the questions that are being kRAVITZ: FLEXNER LECTURE NOVEMBER 8 asked-with alarming frequency-of and by the of- ficers and committees of our AAUP chapter. The Dr. Edward A. Kravitz of the of department neurobiology faculty members who come to us with grievances are of Harvard Medical School will the second annual Louis give far more numerous than ought to be the case in a B. Flexner Lecture on "Studies of in Synaptic Chemistry well-run university. Identified Nerve Cells," Lecture Room Single Physiologically In order to explore some of the problems involved A, Medical School, November 8 at 4 Wednesday p.m. in the defense of faculty rights, and hopefully to find some answers, the University of Pennsylvania chap- PARENTS DAY: NOVEMBER 17 ter of AAUP is scheduling a meeting, open to all Parents of sophomores and transfer students will be on faculty members, on Wednesday, November 15, at campus all day Friday, November 17, to visit their sons' and 4:00 in David Rittenhouse Laboratory A-4. We shall daughters' classrooms; attend a seminar of their own; and fire hear at that time from the Ombudsman, from the questions at University administrators on athletics, finance, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Academic fraternities, student health, placement and vocational advising. Freedom and Responsibility, and from other mem- They will also attend a swimming and diving exhibition at bers of the faculty and the administration. Gimbel Gym's Sheerr Pool, a President's Reception at the That Was the Week That Was fac- Friday, October. 20: In almost any office there was only proportions: Nobel Prizes back-to-back, to alumnus and one topic: "I was listening to the news..." "I was in the ulty member in one week. But a final tremor was yet to come. shower and my wife came rushing in. ." or "I was half asleep In the early-morning excitement many had missed the an- when the man from Reuters called. ." nouncement of alumnus Christian Anfinsen as one of this was a at Dr. Schrief- It sounded as if half the University gets up at 6 a.m. to year's laureates in Chemistry. It reporter President listen to newcasts while the other half lies abed until someone fer's afternoon press conference who corrected Mey- the week. from New York calls to tell them that a colleague has won erson in mid-speech to make it three for Almanac's Oc- the Nobel Prize. (Seasoned Nobelwatchers also reported that tober 24 list of former Penn men who later won the award 8:30 that members of the Physics Department By morning should have included the name of Granit, a Swedish had assembled at David Rittenhouse Laboratory ready for ac- Ragnar scientist who was at the Johnson Foundation with Haldan tion. Led Drs. and Wood, they painted by Heeger, Langenberg Keffer Hartline in the 'sixties and who shared the prize with and a banner NOBEL LAU- strung (CONGRATULATIONS Hartline and Wald in 1967. Most remembered Simon Kuz- REATE BOB) across Walnut Street to the LRSM Building. nets's award in Economics in 1970, and some recalled that Between classes signs in the teaching they posted felt-penned Dr. Otto had won the Nobel Prize when he lobbies and ordered and more people Meyerhof already champagne telephoned came to serve as research of chemis- and waited. professor physiological here from 1940 until his death in 1951.) one man on the New try The problem was that driving Jersey At his conference, Dr. Schrieffer shone as a scientist radio on: the Amanda Wood press Turnpike didn't have his Mary and as a man, the teacher to the Schrieffer. His wife Anna gifted explaining lay press Professor of Physics, Dr. J. Robert the of for which he and Dr. John at Linden, theory superconductivity Grete had phoned ahead to his destination packed Bardeen and Dr. Leon share the Prize. children off to school, and then waited with Cooper the growing Dr. Schrieffer was a 25-year-old graduate student of Bar- "What if he doesn't find out all day?" anxiety, deen's at the University of Illinois when it all happened in found out. The he was meet- But Bob Schrieffer colleague January of 1957. Bardeen already had one Nobel. "Cooper Dr. Fred R. Gamble, rushed to ing at Esso in Linden, up was a postgraduate down from Columbia with a strong back- Kilmer on the and his car at the Joyce stop Turnpike greeted ground in high energy physics. Bardeen had the lifelong in- You won the Nobel Prize." him with "Congratulations. just terest, the background, the contact with experimental facts; Said Schrieffer: "Yeah, what else is new?" and I was his student," Schrieffer recalled. Leaving out his Then he began to believe it. "My friend is a very serious part in the breakthrough (which others credit to a sudden man," he said later, "so I turned around and headed back to inspiration of his on a New York subway), he described the Philadelphia." feverish 13 days in which they worked out the theory, using At campus he met the signs, the banners, the students in disciplines of solid state physics and quantum mechanics to transport, and the refined and scholarly jubilation of a faculty explain what had been unexplainable for fifty years. that had its first on-site Nobel laureate in the history of the Onnes had established in 1911 that the phenomenon of University. superconductivity occurs-that when some metals and alloys Cen- Suddenly the honor of a week before-Dr. Gerald Edel- have been cooled to near absolute zero (-273 degrees The man's sharing of the Prize in Medicine-took on awesome tigrade) they become perfect conductors of electricity. 2 ALMANAC October 31, 1972 Edelman: Medicine Dr. Gerald M. Edelman's day of celebration came the week before at Rockefeller University, where he was the first alum- nus in that school's history to win the Nobel Prize. (He took a PhD. there several years after his M.D. from Penn.) He shares this year's prize in Medicine with one other scientist, Oxford biochemist Dr. Rodney Porter. The two men were honored for separate research on the chemical structure of antibodies-work that stimulated "a fervent research ac- tivity the whole world over, in all fields of immunology in science, yielding practical values for clinical diagnostics and therapy," the Nobel Prize Committee said. Dr. Edelman (M '54) took his B.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • “Schrödinger at 75: the Future of Biology International Meeting”?
    DO YOU WANT TO BE PART OF “Schrödinger at 75: The Future of Biology International Meeting”? On 5-6 September 2018 Trinity College Dublin will hold “Schrödinger at 75: The Future of Life” international meeting. The purpose is to mark the 75th anniversary of a series of visionary public lectures entitled “What is Life?” by Nobel laureate, physicist Erwin Schrödinger, who was then Director of Theoretical Physics at the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies (DIAS). When Schrödinger gave his original lectures in 1943 in Trinity College Dublin, the basis for heredity was the urgent unsolved question. Speakers will address the current burning issues in biology—including the basis of the mind and consciousness, ageing, gene editing, synthetic biology, bioenergetics and the origin of life—and will recapture the spirit of Schrödinger’s lectures by exploring the future of biology. The meeting will build on the strong historical importance of Ireland and Trinity College Dublin in the foundations of 20th century science, and use it as a platform for the world’s leading researchers from all areas of biology to set the scientific agenda, as they see it, for the 21st century. THE ORGANISING COMMITTEE IS HOPING TO ENGAGE TRINITY STUDENTS IN THIS UNIQUE EVENT. Programme The 75th anniversary meeting will focus on the future of questions at the centre of life today. Specific themes include systems biology, bioenergetics, brain and mind, memory, consciousness, ageing, human evolution, and artificial intelligence. It will be a two-day scientific meeting accompanied by a major lecture by the renowned philosopher, cognitive scientist, and author Daniel Dennett on the Future of Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize Winners Part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin
    Cambridge's 92 Nobel Prize winners part 2 - 1951 to 1974: from Crick and Watson to Dorothy Hodgkin By Cambridge News | Posted: January 18, 2016 By Adam Care The News has been rounding up all of Cambridge's 92 Nobel Laureates, celebrating over 100 years of scientific and social innovation. ADVERTISING In this installment we move from 1951 to 1974, a period which saw a host of dramatic breakthroughs, in biology, atomic science, the discovery of pulsars and theories of global trade. It's also a period which saw The Eagle pub come to national prominence and the appearance of the first female name in Cambridge University's long Nobel history. The Gender Pay Gap Sale! Shop Online to get 13.9% off From 8 - 11 March, get 13.9% off 1,000s of items, it highlights the pay gap between men & women in the UK. Shop the Gender Pay Gap Sale – now. Promoted by Oxfam 1. 1951 Ernest Walton, Trinity College: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei 2. 1951 John Cockcroft, St John's / Churchill Colleges: Nobel Prize in Physics, for using accelerated particles to study atomic nuclei Walton and Cockcroft shared the 1951 physics prize after they famously 'split the atom' in Cambridge 1932, ushering in the nuclear age with their particle accelerator, the Cockcroft-Walton generator. In later years Walton returned to his native Ireland, as a fellow of Trinity College Dublin, while in 1951 Cockcroft became the first master of Churchill College, where he died 16 years later. 3. 1952 Archer Martin, Peterhouse: Nobel Prize in Chemistry, for developing partition chromatography 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME LVII COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME LVII The Cell Surface COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY PRESS 1992 COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY VOLUME LVII 1992 by The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press International Standard Book Number 0-87969-063-1 (cloth) International Standard Book Number 0-87969-064-X (paper) International Standard Serial Number 0091-7451 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 34-8174 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY Founded in 1933 by REGINALD G. HARRIS Director of the Biological Laboratory 1924 to 1936 Previous Symposia Volumes I (1933) Surface Phenomena xxvII (1962) Basic Mechanisms in Animal Virus Biology II (1934) Aspects of Growth XXVIII (1963) Synthesis and Structure of Macromolecules III (1935) Photochemical Reactions XXIX (1964) Human Genetics IV (1936) Excitation Phenomena XXX (1965) Sensory Receptors V (1937) Internal Secretions XXXI (1966) The Genetic Code VI (1938) Protein Chemistry XXXII (1967) Antibodies VII (1939) Biological Oxidations XXXIII (1968) Replication of DNA in Microorganisms VIII (1940) Permeability and the Nature of Cell Membranes XXXIV (1969) The Mechanism of Protein Synthesis IX (1941) Genes and Chromosomes: Structure and Organi- XXXV (1970) Transcription of Genetic Material zation XXXVI (1971) Structure and Function of Proteins at the X (1942) The Relation of Hormones to Development Three-dimensional Level XI (1946)
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download?Doi=10.1.1.693.9331&Rep=Rep1&Type=Pdf, 2010;
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/726331; this version posted August 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. One-time learning and reverse salience signals with a Salience Affected Neural Network (SANN) Leendert A Remmelzwaal1* Y ¤, George F R Ellis2 Y ¤, Jonathan Tapson3 Y 1 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 2 Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 3 MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia Y All three authors contributed equally to the first stage of this work [66] ¤ These authors equally took the lead in the further development presented here. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Standard artificial neural networks model key cognitive aspects of brain function, such as learning and classification, but they do not model the affective (emotional) aspects; however primary and secondary emotions play a key role in interactions with the physical, ecological, and social environment. These emotions are associated with memories when neuromodulators such as dopamine and noradrenaline affect entire patterns of synaptically activated neurons. Standard artificial neural networks (ANNs) do not model this non-local effect of neuromodulators, which are a significant feature in the brain (the associated `ascending systems' have been hard-wired into the brain by evolutionary processes). In this paper we present a salience-affected neural network (SANN) model which, at the same time as local network processing of task-specific information, includes non-local salience (significance) effects responding to an input salience signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Global Academic Competition Is Good for the U.S. Meet Stuyvesant
    WINTER 2010 SHIRLEY ANN JACKSON President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Why Global Academic W. Brian Arthur Meet Stuyvesant Competition is On the Nature of Science Teacher Good for the U.S. Technology Elizabeth Fong Building communities, advancing science since 1817 • www.nyas.org Board of Governors Chair Vice Chair Treasurer JOHN E. SEXTON BRUCE S. MCEWEN JAY FURMAN President [ex offi cio] Secretary [ex offi cio] ELLIS RUBINSTEIN LARRY SMITH Governors SETH F. BERKLEY WILLIAM A. HASELTINE JEFFREY D. SACHS LEN BLAVATNIK STEVE HOCHBERG DAVID J. SKORTON NANCY CANTOR TONI HOOVER GEORGE E. THIBAULT ROBERT CATELL MORTON HYMAN IRIS WEINSHALL VIRGINIA W. CORNISH MADELEINE JACOBS ANTHONY WELTERS KENNETH L. DAVIS MEHMOOD KHAN FRANK WILCZEK ROBIN L. DAVISSON ABRAHAM M. LACKMAN DEBORAH E. WILEY BRIAN FERGUSON RUSSELL READ MICHAEL ZIGMAN BRIAN GREENE NANCY ZIMPHER International Governors Chairman Emeritus Honorary Life Governors MANUEL CAMACHO SOLIS TORSTEN N. WIESEL KAREN E. BURKE GERALD CHAN HERBERT J. KAYDEN RAJENDRA K. PACHAURI JOHN F. NIBLACK PAUL STOFFELS President’s Council PETER AGRE, Nobel Laureate & Univ. Prof. and Director, Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Inst., Dept. Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health RICHARD AXEL, Nobel Laureate & University Professor, Columbia Univ.; Investigator, HHMI LEE BABISS, Global Head, Pharma Research, Roche Pharmaceuticals DAVID BALTIMORE, Nobel Laureate & President Emeritus, Caltech On the cover: Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson, President, ETIENNE-EMILE BAULIEU, former President, French Academy of Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. PAUL BERG, Nobel Laureate & Professor Emeritus, Dept. of Biochemistry, Stanford Univ. PHOTO: LONNY KALFUS LEN BLAVATNIK, Chairman, Access Industries GÜNTER BLOBEL, Nobel Laureate & Director, Laboratory for Cell Biology, Rockefeller Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • Thèse 13.08.16
    AU - DELÀ DU PHYSICALISME : LE RESSENTI DE CONSCIENCE. À la recherche d’une nécessaire articulation, attribuée aux corrélats neuronaux de la conscience, entre les processus neuronaux subséquents du cerveau et les ressentis subjectifs de conscience dans l’élaboration, au‐delà du physicalisme, d’une théorie néo‐dualiste de la conscience. 1 Dans les autres occupations, une fois qu’elles ont été menées à bien, avec peine, vient le fruit ; mais en philosophie, le plaisir va du même pas que la connaissance : car ce n’est après avoir appris que l’on jouit du fruit, mais apprendre et jouir vont ensemble. Épicure. Sentences Vaticanes, 27. 2 Tout être vivant est un fossile. Il porte en soi et jusque dans la structure microscopique de ses protéines, les traces sinon les stigmates de son ascendance. Jacques Monod, Le Hasard et la Nécessité. Et encore, Parménide dans son Poème, 4ème fragment, dit faisant allusion à l’espérance : «Mais vois pourtant comme les choses absentes, du fait de l’intellect imposent leur présence» puisque celui qui espère comme celui qui a la foi voit par la pensée les intelligibles et les futurs. Donc, si nous affirmons que quelque chose est juste et que quelque chose est beau, nous disons qu’il en est ainsi de cette chose, en vérité. Et pourtant nous ne voyons jamais par les yeux aucun de ces intelligibles et ne les appréhendons que par l’intellect . Clément d’Alexandrie ( Stromates, V, 15) 3 « L’homme est, à lui-même, le plus prodigieux objet de la nature car il ne peut concevoir ce que c’est que le corps et encore moins ce que c’est qu’esprit et moins qu’aucune chose comment un corps peut être uni avec un esprit.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Crick Personal Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt1k40250c No online items Francis Crick Personal Papers Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego Copyright 2007, 2016 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 [email protected] URL: http://libraries.ucsd.edu/collections/sca/index.html Francis Crick Personal Papers MSS 0660 1 Descriptive Summary Languages: English Contributing Institution: Special Collections & Archives, UC San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla 92093-0175 Title: Francis Crick Personal Papers Creator: Crick, Francis Identifier/Call Number: MSS 0660 Physical Description: 14.6 Linear feet(32 archives boxes, 4 card file boxes, 2 oversize folders, 4 map case folders, and digital files) Physical Description: 2.04 Gigabytes Date (inclusive): 1935-2007 Abstract: Personal papers of British scientist and Nobel Prize winner Francis Harry Compton Crick, who co-discovered the helical structure of DNA with James D. Watson. The papers document Crick's family, social and personal life from 1938 until his death in 2004, and include letters from friends and professional colleagues, family members and organizations. The papers also contain photographs of Crick and his circle; notebooks and numerous appointment books (1946-2004); writings of Crick and others; film and television projects; miscellaneous certificates and awards; materials relating to his wife, Odile Crick; and collected memorabilia. Scope and Content of Collection Personal papers of Francis Crick, the British molecular biologist, biophysicist, neuroscientist, and Nobel Prize winner who co-discovered the helical structure of DNA with James D. Watson. The papers provide a glimpse of his social life and relationships with family, friends and colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel in Medicine: Michael Brown, C'62,M'66 Brown and Goldstein
    Tuesday October 22, 1985 Published by the University ofPennsylvania Volume 32. Number 9 Nobel in Medicine: Michael Brown, C'62,M'66 Brown and Goldstein ... Goldstein and The Tribune estimated 30 to 50 million Ameri- Brown. The paired names have been candi- can adults as potential heart attack victims dates on the biomedical grapevine for years, who will benefit from Brown and Goldstein's and on many branches: A biochemist would breakthrough research. stop at mid-citation and tell the class: At Penn, longtime followers of the Brown "They're going to get the Nobel Prize for and Goldstein research go farther in describing this," an internist predict "It's only a matter the influence ofthe two: In their citation to Dr. of time," an impatient psychiatrist assert, Brown during this June's Alumni Weekend, "They should have had two by now." the School described a series of break- This is the year the Nobel Institute agreed, throughs, adding, "At each step in [their re- and sent the message last Monday from Stock- search] program Drs. Brown and Goldstein holm that Dr. Michael S. Brown, 44, and Dr. have broken new ground in fundamental biol- Joseph L. Goldstein, 45, will share the 1985 ogy and medicine, and their studies have led to Prize in medicine for work that has "revolu- significant advances in our understanding of tionized our knowledge" of cholesterol me- the function and recycling of the cell mem- tabolism and of diseases related to it, athero- brane The picture is of complementary sclerosis and heart attack. genius in collaborators who start with the con- In a Chicago Tribune account the work is viction that where there's a code to break described as having "isolated the cell surface there's a key to find.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC THINKING M N EL-Bolkainy
    SCIENTIFIC THINKING Part II Scientific Era (1600 AD – 2000 AD) M N EL-Bolkainy 2013 OBJECTIVES A The Search for a Method (Scientific revolution) B The Search for Etiology & Mechanisms 1. Gross pathology 2. Epidemiology 3. Microscopic pathology 4. Molecular pathology (Biotechnology revolution) THE SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION (1650 – 1800) AIM To replace the historic approach of gaining knowledge based on speculation by a more rational objective method THE PIONEER FOUNDERS Francis Bacon Galileo Galilei Rene Descartes England Italy France (1561-1626) (1564-1642) (1596-1650) THE ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING (Bacon, 1605) THE VISION • Science and technology could transform the world to the better • Science placed in unworthy (irresponsible) hands could be destructive • Young scientists are more creative than old ones THE TWO WORLD SYSTEMS (GALILEO, 1623) ACADEMIC FREEDOM The first to revolt against dogmatism by supporting the heliocentric theory QUANTITATION OF OBSERVATIONS Hence allowing mathematical analysis DISCOURSE ON METHOD (Descartes, 1637) SKEPTICISM • We start by doubt (hypothesis) in order to reach truth (conclusion) • The only reliable knowledge is mathematics • Except for God and Soul, the whole universe is mathematical • The aim of science is to control nature THE STEPS OF SCIENTIFIC METHOD 1. Definition of a problem 2. Collect data (observations) 3. Formulate a hypothesis 4. Test hypothesis (experiment) 5. Draw conclusions 6. Publication of results 7. Reproducibility by others RESEARCH ERRORS SAMPLE Selected sample Few cases METHODS Outdated reagents Equipment error Personal error Statistical mischoice CONCLUSION Invalidity Causality error THE TREE OF LIVE Association or Causal Relation ? Medieval concept of genesis of Animals from plants CRITERIA OF CAUSALITY 1. Strong association 2.
    [Show full text]