Lkq Report 1.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lkq Report 1.Pdf www.presciencepoint.com Disclaimer This research presentation report expresses our research opinions, which we have based upon certain facts, all of which are based upon publicly available information, and all of which are set out in this research presentation report. Any investment involves substantial risks, including complete loss of capital. Any forecasts or estimates are for illustrative purpose only and should not be taken as limitations of the maximum possible loss or gain. Any information contained in this report may include forward looking statements, expectations, and projections. You should assume these types of statements, expectations, and projections may turn out to be incorrect for reasons beyond Prescience Point LLC’s control. This is not investment advice nor should it be construed as such. Use of Prescience Point LLC’s research is at your own risk. You should do your own research and due diligence before making any investment decision with respect to securities covered herein. You should assume that as of the publication date of any presentation, report or letter, Prescience Point LLC (possibly along with or through our members, partners, affiliates, employees, and/or consultants) along with our clients and/or investors has a short position in all stocks (and/or are long puts/short call options of the stock) covered herein, including without limitation LKQ Corporation, Inc. (“LKQ”), and therefore stands to realize significant gains in the event that the price of its stock declines. Following publication of any presentation, report or letter, we intend to continue transacting in the securities covered therein, and we may be long, short, or neutral at any time hereafter regardless of our initial recommendation. This is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security, nor shall any security be offered or sold to any person, in any jurisdiction in which such offer would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction. Prescience Point LLC is not registered as an investment advisor. To the best of our ability and belief, as of the date hereof, all information contained herein is accurate and reliable and does not omit to state material facts necessary to make the statements herein not misleading, and all information has been obtained from public sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, and who are not insiders or connected persons of the stock covered herein or who may otherwise owe any fiduciary duty or duty of confidentiality to the issuer, or to any other person or entity that was breached by the transmission of information to Prescience Point LLC. However, Prescience Point LLC recognizes that there may be non-public information in the possession of LKQ Corporation, Inc. or other insiders of LKQ Corporation, Inc. that has not been publicly disclosed by LKQ Corporation, Inc. Therefore, such information contained herein is presented “as is,” without warranty of any kind – whether express or implied. Prescience Point LLC makes no other representations, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any such information or with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. 2 Report Highlights From Penny Stock Promoter to $10bn+ Wall Street Darling: The Story of LKQ ReversesCouse Back to US $40.00 Targets, Acquires Keystone 100.0 Auto. Industries for $450m 90.0 $35.00 Acquires Sator, issues $600m HY bonds, JP Morgan resigns as lead banker 80.0 $30.00 Code of Ethics 70.0 policy updated $25.00 60.0 Controller and Chief Co-CEO role created, Accountant Resigns $20.00 mgmt comp increases, 50.0 Director of IR resigns 40.0 $15.00 Acquires Keystone Auto for $811m 30.0 Penny stock $10.00 promoter RedChip Acquires Euro Car initiates coverage Parts for $347m 20.0 CFO Mark $5.00 Spears Resigns 10.0 $0.00 0.0 10/6/2003 10/6/2005 10/6/2007 10/6/2009 10/6/2011 10/6/2013 4 Prescience Point Believes, LKQ Is An Ineffective Roll-up The Company Has Generated No Cumulative Free Cash 1 Flow Adjusted for Acquisitions and Becoming Increasingly Dependent on External Capital to Perpetuate the Illusion of GAAP Profits. LKQ Will Need Larger and Larger Targets to Keep the Growth Game Alive Caught in a Massive Margin Squeeze Gross Margins Are In Persistent Decline, and 2 Inventory Accounting Methods Are Likely Blunting the True Problems. North American Organic Growth Very Likely To Be Overstated and Not Reconcilable to Our Research Problems With the New Growth Story To Divert Attention from its North American 3 Problems, LKQ Bolted to Europe in Hopes of Spinning a New Growth Story; Our Research Suggests LKQ is Already Facing Problems and Quickly Scrambling to Cover Dramatic Overvaluation to Aftermarket Auto, Recycling and Industrial Distributors, and 4 Supported by Sell-Side Analysts’ Failing to Question Assumptions, and Not Considering the Fundamental Problems Facing the Company 5 Previous Accounting Fraud and Failures at Waste Mgmt/Discovery Zone Associated With Numerous Members of the Management Team Have Cost Shareholders Billions of Lost $’s in Aggressive Roll-up Strategies Price Target: $10 - $15 per share >>> 50% – 70% Downside 5 Report Highlights (cont’d) High-Level Indications of Fabricated GAAP Profits, Unsustainable Business Model: LKQ is a classic roll-up, fueling growth through acquisitions. Roll-up business models provide management with a significant amount of discretion in presenting financial results. Roll-ups tend to exhibit strong earnings, CFO, and earnings quality metrics due to the inherent financial statement mechanics of paying for growth through acquisition outflows, which do not affect earnings or CFO. Because of this, free cash flow after acquisitions is an important metric for analyzing roll-ups; it presents a better picture of the business’s economics. LKQ’s free cash flow after acquisitions has been negative in 8 of the last 9 years. Furthermore, our analysis indicates LKQ is an ineffective rollup – wealth creation from years of acquisitions has been nil. Since 2007, LKQ has reported cumulative Earnings and EBIT of $1.22B and $2.15B, respectively. Meanwhile, it has burned cumulative free cash flow after acquisitions of -$1.62B, and raised cumulative net capital of $1.63B, suggesting it has never earned a cash-on-cash return on invested capital. Put another way, the immense wealth generation represented by LKQ’s historical GAAP profits is not observable in the company’s cash flows – it appears to be ‘paper’ wealth generated by accounting gimmickry. In light of this and a broad array of other red flags discussed in this report, we are forced to look through management’s representations. We believe the credibility of LKQ’s financial statements is questionable and that LKQ bears a heightened risk of a crippling inventory and/or goodwill write-down or financial restatement. Reported Organic Growth for LKQ’s North America Business Appears Overstated: LKQ’s aggressive roll-up strategy also gives it a high level of flexibility to inflate revenue growth. LKQ reported organic revenue growth averaging ~6.5% from 2008 – 2012 and ~6% for its North America (NA) Parts & Services (P&S) business (~75% of P&S revenue), with far less variability vs comps, and not a single quarter of negative growth. LKQ does not provide clarity around the calculation or the impact on earnings, making it difficult for investors to confirm its validity. However, based on our research, LKQ’s reported organic growth rate does not appear reconcilable with trends in the primary fundamental factors that drive it. We believe it is overstated. We believe LKQ’s NA growth rate, normalized for a 2013 spike in collision frequency, more likely measures in the range of 0-2%. From 2008 to 2012, annual insurance claims paid for repairable accident claims have been flat according to industry consultant The Romans Group, LLC. Additionally, from 2010 to 2012, growth in Alternative Parts Usage (“APU”) (i.e., market share of alternative auto parts, which LKQ sells, relative to OEM parts), which had risen steadily for 3 decades and was a primary driver of LKQ’s historical organic growth, has flat-lined; going forward, CCC Information Services – provider of the industry’s dominant estimate writing platform and LKQ’s source for APU data – expects it to taper or reverse. Based on industry data sources and our conversations with industry sources, this is resulting from a recent expansion in OEM price-matching programs; they have become more aggressive in pursuit of retaking lost market share by undercutting alternative parts prices, thereby negating LKQ’s value proposition. Internal dealer documents we have obtained indicate the OEMs are increasingly subsidizing dealers to sell parts at levels 33% below aftermarket list prices (i.e., LKQ’s price), making them whole on the loss, and paying them an additional 14% profit on the cost for the part. (Refer to dealer source document on page 12.) As a result, for the first time – according to Mitchell International – parts prices in general deflated in 2012. LKQ management tells investors APU rose 100bp in 2012; however, their own data source and LKQ’s SEC filings refute their claim. 6 Report Highlights (cont’d) Short-Term Thinking Pervades Decision-Making, Signals Desperation to Keep Financials Inflated & Meet Targets: With NA growth waning, LKQ looked to Europe for acquisition candidates. In Q4’2011, it made its 2nd largest acquisition ever, acquiring UK-based Euro Car Parts (ECP), a distributor of mechanical aftermarket parts operating out of 89 branch/store locations. As LKQ pitched investors on the open-ended growth opportunity provided by buying ECP, to our knowledge, it never publicly disclosed that the UK aftermarket parts industry was in significant contraction (2011E -5.8%, according to Datamonitor), or that it is projected to continue contracting; but, LKQ touted ECP’s 30%+ ‘organic’ revenue growth rate from 2009-2011.
Recommended publications
  • America's Highest Paid Government Workers
    ©2014 Center for Media and Democracy. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by information exchange and retrieval system, without permission from the authors. Center for Media and Democracy ALECexposed.org | PRWatch.org | SourceWatch.org 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, WI 53703 | (608) 260-9713 (This publication is available on the internet at OutsourcingAmericaExposed.org) Acknowledgments: Mary Bottari, Lisa Graves, Brendan Fischer, Rebekah Wilce, Nick Surgey, Friday Thorn, Sari Williams, Nikolina Lazic, Pat Barden, Katie Lorenze, Seep Paliwal EXPOSED: America’s Highest Paid Government Workers Lavish salaries. Platinum health care and retirement plans. Job security despite massive screw ups. These are the hallmarks of America’s highest paid “government workers” – and they cost taxpayers millions of dollars. But these well-paid workers aren’t the local teachers, social workers and corrections officers that Americans were told are responsible for state and local budget woes. Rather, they are the corporate executives who worked hard to privatize public services and who use taxpayer dollars to enrich themselves with outlandish salaries and benefits. After a review of shareholder lawsuits, criminal investigations, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctions and court settlements, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) is exposing some of the highest paid “government workers” in this report, including: • Ron Packard, of K12 Inc., America’s highest paid “teacher.” As CEO, Packard made more than $19 million in compen- sation between 2009 and 2013, despite the alarming fact that only 28 percent of K12 Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management, Inc
    Final Report . 3 WASTE MANAGEMENT, mc Edwin L. Miller, Jr. District Attorney March 1992 .. 3 1. INTRODUCTION In late 1990, Waste Management, Inc., filed for a major use permit seeking io develop a privately owned and operated landfill site to be located at Gregory Canyon in San Diego North County. For this project to proceed, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors needed to.- approve a number of permit and zoning change applications presented by Waste Management, Inc. On November 21, 1990, prior to such approval, the Board passed a resolution requesting that the Distric; Attorney conduct an investigation of Waste Management, Inc. In a memorandum to this office, dated December 10, 1990, Supervisor Susan Golding listed The following specific concerns regarding Waste Management, Inc.: Allegations of price-fixing and other anti-trust violations Allegations of criminal conduct Allegations of environmental contamination and illegal dumping of toxic and hazardous materials Allegations of inadequate liability insurance hela by WMI on their municipal and hazardous waste operations Allegations of organized crime connections Initially, we anticipated the full cooperation of Waste Management, Inc., which would have included the company gianting waivers of confidentiality and defamation 1 liability. We considered these conditions essential for a full and compiete investigation, since it would have included unlimited access to company records. However, the company refused to grant these waivers. Our investigation has consisted of acquiring information from a number of sources including the public media, the public records of various governmental bodies, 1) prior investigations conducted by both public and private organizations and the repofis and records of other law enforcement agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • BMB47 Dec05.Pub
    Big Money Bulletin People’s Legislature rallies for Capitol reform Inside More than 400 members of the People’s Legislature rallied against political corruption on the steps of the State Capitol on October 27. Page 2 Participants brandished brooms to drive home the point that the Capitol Feingold gets ’Mr. Smith Award’ needs to be swept clean. They then showered the governor’s office and Milwaukee TV licenses challenged the offices of their state legislators with fliers calling for a special session on reform. Page 3 Colorado dumps Accenture Rally-goers called for Tainted Illinois cash heads north lawmakers to focus the Spread the holiday cheer special session on four Page 4 reform measures, including: Assembly Bill Poll documents ethical decline 626, a bipartisan campaign finance reform bill modeled after the successful systems in Arizona and Maine; Hundreds of brooms drove home the rally’s message Senate Bill 1, an ethics reform proposal that replaces the state Elections Board and Ethics Board with a beefed-up and politically independent Government Accountability Board; and Assembly Joint Resolutions 22 and 41, which would create competitive elections through reform of legislative redistricting. Message Getting Through Less than a week after the rally, the state Senate approved Senate Bill 1 on a bipartisan 28-5 vote. Governor Jim Doyle signaled his support for December 2005 SB 1 and top Assembly leaders said they thought the bill could pass the lower house as well. Edition No. 47 A recent St. Norbert College Survey Center poll showed that political corruption is now one of the most common answers people give when On the Web: asked to identify the most important problem facing www.wisdc.org Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY Andelman Julian and Dwight Underbill, Health Effects From Hazardous Waste Sites, Chelsea, Lewis, 1987. Apogee Research, Inc., A Report on Clean Water Investment and Job Creation, March 20,1992. The Atlanta Constitution, "Hot Air From the Business Roundtable," Monday, March 14, 1988. Bechtel, Annual Report, December 1992. Been, Vacua, "Unpopular Neighbors: Are Dumps and Landfills Sated Equitably?" Resources, Spring 1994, No. 115. Bueckman, Donna, Camber Sunita, and Milton Russell, Underground Storage Tanks: Resource Requirements For Corrective Action, Waste Management Research and Education Institute, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, December 1991. Bullard, Robert D., People of Color: Environmental Groups, Environmental Justice Resource Center, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, 1994. California (State of) Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, Hazardous Materials Unit, Hazardous Materials Incidents: California, January 1990 -December 1991, April 1994. Canada Employment and Immigration Advisory Council and Management Information Services, Inc., Environment and Employment in Canada: The Final Report of an Interactive Symposium for Labor, Business and Environmentalists, MISI, Washington, DC, April 1992. Chakravarty, Subrata N, "Dean Buntrock's Green Machine," Forces, August 2, 1993. Chemical Manufacturers Association, "Impact Analysis of RCRA Corrective Action and CERCLA Remediation Programs," Washington, DC, CMA, 1988, cited in Shreekant Gupta, George Van Houtven, and Maureen Cropper, "Do Benefits and Costs Matter in Environmental Regulation? An Analysis of EPA Decisions under Superfund." Chemical Regulation Reporter, "Current Report Index," Vol. 17, No.3, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, April 16, 1993. Chicago Tribune, "Study Shows Going Green Helps Economy Grow Too," March 3, 1993. Clean Sites, Improving Remedy Selection: An Explicit and Interactive Process for the Superfund Program, October 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditing After Sarbanes-Oxley
    thi79492_fm_i-xx.qxd 1/8/08 2:29 AM Page i Rev. Confirming Pages Auditing After Sarbanes-Oxley Illustrative Cases thi79492_fm_i-xx.qxd 1/8/08 2:29 AM Page ii Rev. Confirming Pages thi79492_fm_i-xx.qxd 1/8/08 2:29 AM Page iii Rev. Confirming Pages Auditing After Sarbanes-Oxley Illustrative Cases Second Edition Dr. Jay C. Thibodeau Deborah Freier Boston Burr Ridge, IL Dubuque, IA New York San Francisco St. Louis Bangkok Bogotá Caracas Kuala Lumpur Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan Montreal New Delhi Santiago Seoul Singapore Sydney Taipei Toronto thi79492_fm_i-xx.qxd 1/8/08 2:29 AM Page iv Rev. Confirming Pages AUDITING AFTER SARBANES-OXLEY: ILLUSTRATIVE CASES Published by McGraw-Hill/Irwin, a business unit of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10020. Copyright © 2009, 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, in any network or other electronic storage or transmission, or broadcast for distance learning. Some ancillaries, including electronic and print components, may not be available to customers outside the United States. This book is printed on acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 DOC/DOC 0 9 8 ISBN 978-0-07-337949-4 MHID 0-07-337949-2 Editorial director: Stewart Mattson Senior sponsoring editor: Alice Harra Editorial assistant: Christina Lane Marketing manager: Scott S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies
    Volume 20, Number 4 Print ISSN: 1078-4950 Online ISSN: 1532-5822 JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY FOR CASE STUDIES Instructors’ Notes Co-Editors Shih Yung Chou, University of Texas of the Permian Basin Herbert Sherman, Long Island University The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc. Editorial content is under the control of the Allied Academies, Inc., a non-profit association of scholars, whose purpose is to support and encourage research and the sharing and exchange of ideas and insights throughout the world. Page ii Authors execute a publication permission agreement and assume all liabilities. Neither Jordan Whitney Enterprises nor Allied Academies is responsible for the content of the individual manuscripts. Any omissions or errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of manuscripts for publication from among those submitted for consideration. The Publishers accept final manuscripts in digital form and make adjustments solely for the purposes of pagination and organization. The Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies is owned and published by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc, PO Box 1032, Weaverville, NC 28787, USA. Those interested in communicating with the Journal, should contact the Executive Director of the Allied Academies at [email protected]. Copyright 2014 by Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc, USA Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies, Volume 20, Number4, 2014 Page iii EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS Irfan Ahmed Devi Akella Sam Houston State University Albany State University Huntsville, Texas Albany, Georgia Charlotte Allen Thomas T. Amlie Stephen F.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report to Donors
    ANNUAL REPORT TO DONORS 2 0 1 5 DONOR HONOR ROLL 2 6 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 1 8 SCIENCE 0 4 C O N T 2015 E ANNUAL REPORT N T O T DONORS S 0 1 Dear Friends, In 2015, The Field Museum launched a five-year strategic plan for transformation. Guided by its four main initiatives, your Museum is evolving for the 21st century. On the cover of this report you will find images from the stunningCyrus Tang Hall of China. In addition to being the largest exhibition in the United States to examine Chinese culture and history from an anthropological perspective, it incorporates new technologies and exhibition design to transform the visitor experience into a personal journey of scientific discovery. The Museum made great strides in 2015 to deepen the impact of its education programs. The N. W. Harris Learning Collection, now more than 100 years old, shared artifacts and specimens with 69,000 students in classrooms across the Midwest. New digital studio opportunities inspired teen scientists, and a workshop series offered training for educators to incorporate Museum collections and Next Generation Science Standards in classrooms. This year, the Field played a fundamental role in protecting areas of biological and cultural importance, including the 3.3 million-acre Sierra del Divisor National Park in Peru and the Pullman National Monument on the South Side of Chicago. Museum scientists described new species, recorded rare evolutionary occurrences, and shared the trove of knowledge held in our collections with citizens and scientists around the world. The Museum will continue to maximize the influence of collections-based science in research and conservation action for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Milwaukee Magazine: Dirty Work
    Milwaukee Magazine: Dirty Work Dirty Work by Stephen Filmanowicz and Steven J. Korris With additional research by editorial interns Jill Konz, Josh McColough and Julia Starzyk Photographed by Chris Corsmeier Stephen Filmanowicz is a senior editor of Milwaukee Magazine. Steven J. Korris is a Madison-based writer. Are City Hall and the State Capitol clean places to do business? The story of Waste Management and its well-connected point man, Bill Katzman, may make you wonder what smells worse - our garbage or our garbage contracts. Richard Maslowski still remembers 1981, the year local garbage prices headed for the sky. That year, the City of Glendale's trash contractor, international giant Waste Management Inc., informed the city that its trash bill would rise more than 300 percent the next year. As city administrator, Maslowski had the sticky job of breaking the news to other city officials. "They didn't take it very favorably," he says. "The mayor called it 'a prime example of corporate greed.'" Strangely, Waste Management didn't have the kind of 1981 that would normally justify such a price increase. The company's profits rose 42 percent and its profit margin widened to nearly 11 percent. The National Association of Investment Clubs named the firm its "growth company of the year." The outlook was just as bright in Milwaukee, where an aggressive building and acquisitions spree left Waste Management's regional vice president, Bill Katzman, in control of four local landfills. The only major competing dump in the metropolitan area, a facility run by Milwaukee County, closed about the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • TRASH and the PUBLIC INTEREST the Sanitation Industry, Workers, and Public Safety and Health
    TRASH AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Sanitation Industry, Workers, and Public Safety and Health An Industry Report from the International Brotherhood of Teamsters TABLE OF CONTENTS A Message From Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa 1 Introduction 3 From Memphis to Megafills 6 Trash is Big Business 9 Mountains of Garbage 13 Where the Garbage Goes – and Who Is at Risk Along the Way 17 Landfills: a Dangerous Disposal System 21 The Last Link in the Global Supply Chain: Ewaste Work 29 Should We Trust the Trash Giants? 31 Sanitation Work Today: Dangerous, Dirty, and Poorly Paid 37 Unions and Communities: Common Goals 45 Rekindling the Spirit of Memphis 51 Endnotes 53 ILLUSTRATIONS Megaprofits: Revenue Per Employee, 2005 9 Major Firms in Waste Industry, 2005 10 Executive Compensation at the Big Three Trash Firms, 2005 11 What Happens to the Trash: Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Generated, Estimated, and Rates of Recycling, Waste-to-Energy and Landfilling, United States, 1989-2004 15 Is New York’s Trash in Your Backyard? Leading States Importing and Exporting Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), 2004 23 Causes of Liner Failure 24 Dangerous Work: Incidence Rates of Total Non-fatal Occupational Injury and Illness Cases, Selected Private Industries, 2004 40 Number and Rate of Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses in Waste Collection (NAICS code 562100), 2004 41 Minorities in the Waste Industry, 2003 42 A MESSAGE FROM TEAMSTERS GENERAL PRESIDENT JIM HOFFA Protecting America from Waste Industry Abuses: It Can’t Happen Without Sanitation Workers n April 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in Memphis while supporting Istriking sanitation workers there.
    [Show full text]
  • 60Th-Anniversary-Boo
    HORATIO ALGER ASSOCIATION of DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS, INC. A SIXTY-YEAR HISTORY Ad Astra Per Aspera – To the Stars Through Difficulties 1947 – 2007 Craig R. Barrett James A. Patterson Louise Herrington Ornelas James R. Moffett Leslie T. Welsh* Thomas J. Brokaw Delford M. Smith Darrell Royal John C. Portman, Jr. Benjy F. Brooks* Jenny Craig Linda G. Alvarado Henry B. Tippie John V. Roach Robert C. Byrd Sid Craig Wesley E. Cantrell Herbert F. Boeckmann, II Kenny Rogers Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Craig Hall John H. Dasburg Jerry E. Dempsey Art Buchwald Paul Harvey Clarence Otis, Jr. Archie W. Dunham Joe L. Dudley, Sr. S. Truett Cathy Thomas W. Landry* Richard M. Rosenberg Bill Greehey Ruth Fertel* Robert H. Dedman* Ruth B. Love David M. Rubenstein Chuck Hagel Quincy Jones Julius W. Erving J. Paul Lyet* Howard Schultz James V. Kimsey Dee J. Kelly Daniel K. Inouye John H. McConnell Roger T. Staubach Marvin A. Pomerantz John Pappajohn Jean Nidetch Fred W. O’Green* Christ Thomas Sullivan Franklin D. Raines Don Shula Carl R. Pohlad Willie Stargell* Kenneth Eugene Behring Stephen C. Schott Monroe E. Trout D.B. Reinhart* Henry Viscardi, Jr.* Doris K. Christopher Philip Anschutz Dennis R. Washington Robert H. Schuller William P. Clements, Jr. Peter M. Dawkins Carol Bartz Joe L. Allbritton Romeo J. Ventres John B. Connally, Esq.* J. R. “Rick” Hendrick, III Arthur A. Ciocca Walter Anderson Carol Burnett Nicholas D’Agostino* Richard O. Jacobson Thomas C. Cundy Dwayne O. Andreas Trammell Crow Helen M. Gray* Harold F. “Gerry” Lenfest William J. Dor Dorothy L. Brown Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Talk WM We’Ve Done Before, One Thing Will Remain Consistent: a Priority to Serve Our Customers and Communities from Day 19 Helpful Reminders One
    WELCOME to WASTE MANAGEMENT Table of Contents LETTER FROM 3 Letter from the CEO 4 Our Story 6 WM Commitments & Values THE CEO 7 WM Senior Leadership Team On behalf of our senior leadership team and 8 Employee Spotlights everyone in our organization, welcome to the WM family! As we begin this new journey, 10 Integration Journey I can’t help but think of the power driving our combined 11 A World-Class Integration company forward. We are now 50,000 strong and will 12 Did You Know... serve more than 25 million customers this year. What an amazing opportunity and responsibility to help our 15 WM Innovations communities thrive. While this merger is unlike anything 16 How to Talk WM we’ve done before, one thing will remain consistent: a priority to serve our customers and communities from Day 19 Helpful Reminders One. As long as we put people first – both our employees and customers – we’ll continue to see this business grow, and when our business grows, we’ll have an even bigger platform to deliver on our commitments to our communities and the environment.” - Jim Fish, President and CEO of Waste Management Legal Disclaimer: Employees covered under a collective bargaining ...we are now 50,000 strong and will serve more than agreement should refer to their 25 million customers this year. What an amazing opportunity. specific contracts for details on the terms and conditions of employment. 2 | YOUR WM EXPERIENCE YOUR WM EXPERIENCE | 3 1982 Waste Management becomes the 25 MILLION world’s largest waste disposal company, Corporate, environmental, OUR STORY municipal, commercial and industrial customers diversity and workplace awards: with more than $1 billion in sales.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Annual Report
    2007 annual report The first known wheel. The world’s smallest lemur. scienTific research The most complete Tyrannosaurus rex. discovering the unknown The Museum’s collections lie at the heart of These are just a few of the 24 million objects in The Field Museum’s collections that help us investigate questions such as how ancient humans formed partnerships or the effects of global warming its mission. With artifacts and specimens ranging on biodiversity. from a rare Sumatran rhinoceros to lamps from the world’s first city, the Museum is the keeper 2007 was especially productive for our scientists. For more than a century, the Museum has used the answers to these types of questions to help its of essential pieces of evidence for investigations Throughout the year, they published more than visitors discover the Earth’s people, organisms and environments. Today, through its scientific research into human history and the natural world. 200 scientific works; discovered an estimated 100 and public outreach programs, the Museum contributes to the greater understanding of the evolutionary new species of plants and animals; and conducted processes that are the source of our planet’s vitality. The collections are supported by the work of 250 full-time scientific staff members and 300 nearly 100 advanced training workshops. Here Throughout 2007, the Museum built on its tradition of discovery to push the boundaries of science research associates that form one of the world’s are some highlights: and pioneer new ways of helping people connect with their world. With the support of our many friends strongest faculties for natural science research.
    [Show full text]