Auditing After Sarbanes-Oxley
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14A-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED in PROXY STATEMENT Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: Preliminary Proxy Statement Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) Definitive Proxy Statement Definitive Additional Materials Soliciting Material under §240. 14a-12 WEX INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): No fee required. Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Table of Contents WEX INC. -
Top 100 for 1H 2015
` Top 100 for 1H 2015 Securities Class Action Services, LLC Published: September 28, 2015 Executive Summary ISS Securities Class Action Services tracked 61 settlements for the first half of 2015, up from from 53 settlements seen duringthe first half of 2014. Out of the 61 settlement agreements, five settlements ranked in the ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 100 for 1H 2015, which amounted for a 450 percent increase in settlement funds when compared to the same period in the previous year. The cases identified include: › American International Group, Inc. (2008) (S.D.N.Y.), which brought the highest settlement fund($900 million for approximately 200 eligible securities). › Bear Stearns Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates › IndyMac Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Individual & Underwriter Defendants) › Activision Blizzard, Inc. › Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) (2008) Out of the five settlements, four were filed in the federal courts during the midst of the financial credit crisis, while one was filed in the state court relating to the company’s private sale transaction. Two of the five were alleged violating Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Practices) while three were alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (Civil Liabilities on Account of False Registration Statement). Two of the five settlements relate to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and have restated their financial during the relevant periods. Of the five settlements, two were identified in the S&P Index. One SEC initiated settlement placed in the Top 30 SEC Disgorgement amounting to $200 Million. The Securities Class Action Services Tentative Settlement Pipeline stands $17.3 Billion as of 31 July 2015. -
America's Highest Paid Government Workers
©2014 Center for Media and Democracy. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by information exchange and retrieval system, without permission from the authors. Center for Media and Democracy ALECexposed.org | PRWatch.org | SourceWatch.org 520 University Avenue, Suite 260 Madison, WI 53703 | (608) 260-9713 (This publication is available on the internet at OutsourcingAmericaExposed.org) Acknowledgments: Mary Bottari, Lisa Graves, Brendan Fischer, Rebekah Wilce, Nick Surgey, Friday Thorn, Sari Williams, Nikolina Lazic, Pat Barden, Katie Lorenze, Seep Paliwal EXPOSED: America’s Highest Paid Government Workers Lavish salaries. Platinum health care and retirement plans. Job security despite massive screw ups. These are the hallmarks of America’s highest paid “government workers” – and they cost taxpayers millions of dollars. But these well-paid workers aren’t the local teachers, social workers and corrections officers that Americans were told are responsible for state and local budget woes. Rather, they are the corporate executives who worked hard to privatize public services and who use taxpayer dollars to enrich themselves with outlandish salaries and benefits. After a review of shareholder lawsuits, criminal investigations, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctions and court settlements, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) is exposing some of the highest paid “government workers” in this report, including: • Ron Packard, of K12 Inc., America’s highest paid “teacher.” As CEO, Packard made more than $19 million in compen- sation between 2009 and 2013, despite the alarming fact that only 28 percent of K12 Inc. -
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Speciñed in Its Charter) Delaware 04-3432319 (State Or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (Mark One) ¥ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Ñscal year ended December 31, 2001 or n TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File number 0-27275 Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant as SpeciÑed in Its Charter) Delaware 04-3432319 (State or other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) IdentiÑcation No.) 500 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA 02139 (Address of Principal Executive OÇces) (Zip Code) Registrant's Telephone Number, including area code: (617) 444-3000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.01 par value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has Ñled all reports required to be Ñled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to Ñle such reports), and (2) has been subject to such Ñling requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¥ No n Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent Ñlers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in deÑnitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. -
Waste Management, Inc
Final Report . 3 WASTE MANAGEMENT, mc Edwin L. Miller, Jr. District Attorney March 1992 .. 3 1. INTRODUCTION In late 1990, Waste Management, Inc., filed for a major use permit seeking io develop a privately owned and operated landfill site to be located at Gregory Canyon in San Diego North County. For this project to proceed, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors needed to.- approve a number of permit and zoning change applications presented by Waste Management, Inc. On November 21, 1990, prior to such approval, the Board passed a resolution requesting that the Distric; Attorney conduct an investigation of Waste Management, Inc. In a memorandum to this office, dated December 10, 1990, Supervisor Susan Golding listed The following specific concerns regarding Waste Management, Inc.: Allegations of price-fixing and other anti-trust violations Allegations of criminal conduct Allegations of environmental contamination and illegal dumping of toxic and hazardous materials Allegations of inadequate liability insurance hela by WMI on their municipal and hazardous waste operations Allegations of organized crime connections Initially, we anticipated the full cooperation of Waste Management, Inc., which would have included the company gianting waivers of confidentiality and defamation 1 liability. We considered these conditions essential for a full and compiete investigation, since it would have included unlimited access to company records. However, the company refused to grant these waivers. Our investigation has consisted of acquiring information from a number of sources including the public media, the public records of various governmental bodies, 1) prior investigations conducted by both public and private organizations and the repofis and records of other law enforcement agencies. -
UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 13F Report for the Calendar Year or Quarter Ended December 31, 1999 ------------------- Check here if Amendment: / /; Amendment Number: ______ This Amendment (Check only one.): / / is a restatement. / / adds new holdings entries. Institutional Investment Manager Filing this Report: Name: U.S. Bancorp ------------ Address: 601 Second Avenue South ----------------------- Minneapolis, MN 55402-4302 -------------------------- Form 13F File Number: 28- 551 --- The institutional investment manager filing this report and the person by whom it is signed hereby represent that the person signing the report is authorized to submit it, that all information contained herein is true, correct and complete, and that it is understood that all required items, statements, schedules, lists, and tables, are considered integral parts of this form. Person signing this Report on Behalf of Reporting Manager: Name: Merita D. Schollmeier --------------------- Title: Vice President -------------- Phone: 651-205-2030 ------------ Signature, Place, and Date of Signing: /s/ Merita D. Schollmeier St. Paul, MN 2/11/00 - ------------------------- ------------ ------- Information contained on the attached Schedule 13(f) is provided solely to comply with the requirements of Section 13(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Regulations promulgated thereunder. It is the position of U.S. Bancorp, that for any purpose other than Schedule 13-F, it is not an institutional investment manager and does not, in fact, exercise investment discretion with regard to any securities held in a fiduciary or agency capacity by any subsidiary or trust company. Report Type (Check only one.): /X/ 13F HOLDINGS REPORT. (Check here if all holdings of this reporting manager are reported in this report.) / / 13F NOTICE. -
BMB47 Dec05.Pub
Big Money Bulletin People’s Legislature rallies for Capitol reform Inside More than 400 members of the People’s Legislature rallied against political corruption on the steps of the State Capitol on October 27. Page 2 Participants brandished brooms to drive home the point that the Capitol Feingold gets ’Mr. Smith Award’ needs to be swept clean. They then showered the governor’s office and Milwaukee TV licenses challenged the offices of their state legislators with fliers calling for a special session on reform. Page 3 Colorado dumps Accenture Rally-goers called for Tainted Illinois cash heads north lawmakers to focus the Spread the holiday cheer special session on four Page 4 reform measures, including: Assembly Bill Poll documents ethical decline 626, a bipartisan campaign finance reform bill modeled after the successful systems in Arizona and Maine; Hundreds of brooms drove home the rally’s message Senate Bill 1, an ethics reform proposal that replaces the state Elections Board and Ethics Board with a beefed-up and politically independent Government Accountability Board; and Assembly Joint Resolutions 22 and 41, which would create competitive elections through reform of legislative redistricting. Message Getting Through Less than a week after the rally, the state Senate approved Senate Bill 1 on a bipartisan 28-5 vote. Governor Jim Doyle signaled his support for December 2005 SB 1 and top Assembly leaders said they thought the bill could pass the lower house as well. Edition No. 47 A recent St. Norbert College Survey Center poll showed that political corruption is now one of the most common answers people give when On the Web: asked to identify the most important problem facing www.wisdc.org Wisconsin. -
2016 Takeover Law & Practice
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Takeover Law and Practice 2016 This outline describes certain aspects of the current legal and economic environment relating to takeovers, including mergers and acquisitions and tender offers. The outline topics include a discussion of directors’ fiduciary duties in managing a company’s affairs and considering major transactions, key aspects of the deal-making process, mechanisms for protecting a preferred transaction and increasing deal certainty, advance takeover preparedness and responding to hostile offers, structural alternatives and cross-border transactions. Particular focus is placed on recent case law and developments in takeovers. This edition reflects developments through mid-March 2016. © March 2016 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz All rights reserved. Takeover Law and Practice TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Current Developments ..............................................................................1 A. Executive Summary ............................................................ 1 B. M&A Trends and Developments ........................................ 2 1. Deal Activity ........................................................... 2 2. Hostile and Unsolicited M&A ................................ 4 3. Private Equity Trends ............................................. 4 4. Acquisition Financing ............................................. 7 a. Investment Grade Acquisition Financing..................................................... 7 b. Leveraged Acquisition Financing ............... 7 5. Shareholder -
BEA Systems, Inc
BEA AT A GLANCE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE (as of and for the period ended July 31, 2004) Q2 Total Revenue $262.3 million – 7% increase over last year’s quarter Q2 License Revenue $116.3 million Q2 License/Services Mix 44.3% /55.7% Q2 Customer Support $113.5 million – 78% of services revenue, 25% year over year growth Q2 Operating Margin (a) 19.5% (GAAP Operating Margin 17.9%) Q2 EPS (a)(b) $0.08 (GAAP EPS $0.07) Deferred Revenues $261 million – Down approx. $7 million from Q1 05 Current Cash and Restricted Cash $1.58 billion Q2 Operating Cash Flow $57.2 million – 27th consecutive quarter of positive operating cash flow Days’ sales outstanding 71 days (a) Adjusted to exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets and goodwill; employer payroll taxes on stock options; net gains or losses on investments in equity securities and other non-recurring charges. (b) Amounts presented on a pro forma basis, assuming a tax rate of 30 percent. Background on BEA Systems BEA is the world's leading application infrastructure software company with more than 15,000 customers around the world, including the majority of the Fortune Global 500. Companies turn to BEA to help them evolve their existing enterprise software applications from inflexible, redundant, legacy architectures to highly responsive, mature Web infrastructures. Services Oriented Architecture (SOA) is an industry movement that is transforming IT to an efficient, more responsive function and is improving overall IT economics. SOA enables the service- driven enterprise to efficiently service its constituents – customers, employees, partners—and accelerates the service response time of the business. -
SEC News Digest, August 2, 2000
SEC NEWS DIGEST Issue 2000-147 August 2000 COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CORRECTION Press Release 2000-106 which appeared in the August issue of the Digest included The correct address is an inaccurate EDGAR filing web site address https//www edgarfiling sec.gov INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT ARK FUNDS ET AL An order has been issued on an application filed by ARK Funds et al for an order under Section 17b of the Investment Company Act exempting applicants from Section of four series of The 17a of the Act The order permits the proposed reorganizations Govett Funds Inc with and into four series of ARK Funds Because of certain Act IC-24587 affiliations applicants may not rely on Rule 17a-8 under the Rel July 31 SELF-REGULATORY ORGANIZATIONS IMMEDIATE EFFECTWENESS OF PROPOSED RULE CHANGE proposed rule change filed by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board consisting of technical amendments to MSRB Rules G-8 and G-15 SR-MSRB-00-9 has become Publication of effective under Section 9b3A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 34- the proposal is expected in the Federal Register during the week of August Rel 43090 APPROVAL OF PROPOSED RULE CHANGE The Commission approved proposed rule change SR-CBOE-99-35 submitted by the orders Chicago Board Options Exchange relating to facilitation crosses of index options Publication of the order in the Federal Register is expected during the week of August Rel 34-43099 DELISTJNGS GRANTED An order has been issued granting the application of the New York Stock Exchange to $.01 strike from listing and registration Dyersburg -
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY Andelman Julian and Dwight Underbill, Health Effects From Hazardous Waste Sites, Chelsea, Lewis, 1987. Apogee Research, Inc., A Report on Clean Water Investment and Job Creation, March 20,1992. The Atlanta Constitution, "Hot Air From the Business Roundtable," Monday, March 14, 1988. Bechtel, Annual Report, December 1992. Been, Vacua, "Unpopular Neighbors: Are Dumps and Landfills Sated Equitably?" Resources, Spring 1994, No. 115. Bueckman, Donna, Camber Sunita, and Milton Russell, Underground Storage Tanks: Resource Requirements For Corrective Action, Waste Management Research and Education Institute, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, December 1991. Bullard, Robert D., People of Color: Environmental Groups, Environmental Justice Resource Center, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, 1994. California (State of) Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, Hazardous Materials Unit, Hazardous Materials Incidents: California, January 1990 -December 1991, April 1994. Canada Employment and Immigration Advisory Council and Management Information Services, Inc., Environment and Employment in Canada: The Final Report of an Interactive Symposium for Labor, Business and Environmentalists, MISI, Washington, DC, April 1992. Chakravarty, Subrata N, "Dean Buntrock's Green Machine," Forces, August 2, 1993. Chemical Manufacturers Association, "Impact Analysis of RCRA Corrective Action and CERCLA Remediation Programs," Washington, DC, CMA, 1988, cited in Shreekant Gupta, George Van Houtven, and Maureen Cropper, "Do Benefits and Costs Matter in Environmental Regulation? An Analysis of EPA Decisions under Superfund." Chemical Regulation Reporter, "Current Report Index," Vol. 17, No.3, Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC, April 16, 1993. Chicago Tribune, "Study Shows Going Green Helps Economy Grow Too," March 3, 1993. Clean Sites, Improving Remedy Selection: An Explicit and Interactive Process for the Superfund Program, October 1990. -
Takeover Law and Practice Guide 2020
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Takeover Law and Practice 2020 This outline describes certain aspects of the current legal and economic environment relating to takeovers, including mergers and acquisitions and tender offers. The outline topics include a discussion of directors’ fiduciary duties in managing a company’s affairs and considering major transactions, key aspects of the deal-making process, mechanisms for protecting a preferred transaction and increasing deal certainty, advance takeover preparedness and responding to hostile offers, structural alternatives and cross-border transactions. Particular focus is placed on recent case law and developments in takeovers. This edition reflects developments through September 2020. © October 2020 Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz All rights reserved. Takeover Law and Practice TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Current Developments ..............................................................................1 A. Overview ............................................................................. 1 B. M&A Trends and Developments ........................................ 2 1. Deal Activity ........................................................... 2 2. Unsolicited M&A.................................................... 4 3. Private Equity Trends ............................................. 5 4. SPAC Trends .......................................................... 6 5. Acquisition Financing ............................................. 8 6. Shareholder Litigation ...........................................