DOCSLIB.ORG

Arar Commission, a New Review Mechanism for the RCMP's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A New Review Mechanism for the RCMP’s National Security Activities Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2006 Cat. No: CP32-88/2-2006E ISBN 0-660-19666-2 Available through your local bookseller or through Publishing and Depository Services Public Works and Government Services Canada Ottawa, Ontario KIA OS5 Telephone: (613) 941-5995 Orders only: 1 800 635-7943 Fax: (613) 954-5779 or 1 800 565-7757 Internet: http://publications.gc.ca Printed by: Gilmore Print Group Ce document est également publié en français sous le titre Un nouveau mécanisme d’examen des activités de la GRC en matière de sécurité nationale www.ararcommission.ca A NEW REVIEW MECHANISM FOR THE RCMP’S NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES Contents I INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 17 1. Introduction 17 2. Organization of the Report 17 3. Overview of my Conclusions and Recommendations 18 II THE HISTORY AND EVOLUTION OF CANADA’S NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES 23 1. Introduction 23 2. Confederation to World War II 25 3. National Security After World War II 26 4. The 1970 October Crisis and Its Aftermath 29 5. The McDonald Commission 32 6. 1984-2001 36 6.1 Overview 36 6.2 Introduction to the RCMP in the CSIS Era 38 6.3 RCMP National Security Activities After the Creation of CSIS 40 6.4 Intelligence-Led Policing 42 6.5 The Internal Organization of the RCMP’s National Security Activities Before 9/11 45 6.6 Interaction with CSIS 46 6.7 The Air India Bombings of 1985 47 III LEGISLATIVE CHANGES FOLLOWING THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 55 1. Introduction 55 2. New Offences 55 2.1 Anti-terrorism Act 55 2.2 New Definitions: Terrorist Activity and Terrorist Group 56 A NEW REVIEW MECHANISM FOR THE RCMP’S 2 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES 2.3 New Terrorism Offences 58 2.4 New Terrorist Financing Offences 59 2.5 Definition of Terrorism Offences 59 2.6 Forfeiture Orders and Terrorist Financing Offences 60 2.7 Consent of Provincial or Federal Attorney General 60 2.8 Other New Offences 61 2.9 Security of Information Act 61 2.10 Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act 63 2.11 United Nations Suppression of Terrorism Regulations 65 3. New Police Powers 66 3.1 Investigative Hearings 66 3.2 Recognizance With Conditions (Preventive Arrest) 68 3.3 Enhanced Electronic Surveillance Provisions 69 3.4 An Act to amend the Foreign Missions and International Organizations Act 69 4. Enhanced Protections for National Security Confidentiality 70 4.1 Canada Evidence Act 70 4.2 Access to Information and Privacy Legislation 72 5. Increased Information Sharing and Integration of National Security Activities 73 5.1 United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 73 5.2 Canada-U.S. Smart Border Agreement 75 5.3 New Department: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada 76 5.4 New National Security Policy 77 5.5 Public Safety Act 77 IV CURRENT NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES OF THE RCMP 83 1. Introduction 83 2. Organizational Overview 84 2.1 Organization of RCMP National Security Activities 84 2.2 Ministerial Directives 85 2.3 Internal Policies 90 2.4 Internal Accountability Mechanisms 91 2.5 Personnel Involved in the National Security Mandate 94 2.6 Recruiting and Training 94 3. Scope of RCMP’s Current National Security Activities 96 3.1 National Security Intelligence Branch 96 3.2 National Security Operations Branch 98 3.3 Threat Assessment Branch 100 CONTENTS 3 3.4 Criminal Extremism Analysis Section 101 3.5 NSISs, INSETs and IBETs 102 4. Overlap With Other Areas of RCMP 107 5. Information and Intelligence Management, Retention and Sharing 108 5.1 Information Coming Into the RCMP 109 5.2 Information Storage and Maintenance 111 5.3 Information Sharing and Dissemination 112 6. Integration and Interaction with Other Forces and Agencies 116 6.1 Integration 118 6.2 Interaction 119 6.2.1 Other Federal National Security Actors 119 6.2.2 Provincial and Municipal Police Agencies 120 6.2.3 U.S. and Other Foreign Agencies 121 V CANADA’S NATIONAL SECURITY LANDSCAPE 127 1. Introduction 127 2. Canadian Security Intelligence Service 128 2.1 Relevant Legislation 128 2.2 Mandate 129 2.3 Priority Areas 130 2.3.1 Terrorism 131 2.3.2 Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction 132 2.3.3 Espionage and Foreign-Influenced Activities 132 2.3.4 Transnational Criminal Activity 133 2.3.5 Information Security Threats 133 2.3.6 Security Screening and Assessments 134 2.3.6.1 Government Screening 134 2.3.6.2 Sensitive-Site Screening 135 2.3.6.3 Foreign Screening 135 2.3.6.4 Immigration and Citizenship Screening 136 2.3.6.5 Refugee Screening 136 2.4 Assistance to Enforcement 136 2.5 Information Disclosure Practices 138 2.6 Interaction Between CSIS and the RCMP 139 2.7 Operations Abroad 140 3. Integrated Threat Assessment Centre 141 3.1 Relevant Legislation 141 3.2 Mandate 141 4. Communications Security Establishment 143 4.1 Relevant Legislation 143 4.2 Mandate 143 A NEW REVIEW MECHANISM FOR THE RCMP’S 4 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES 5. Department of National Defence 147 5.1 Relevant Legislation 147 5.2 Mandate 147 5.3 Domestic National Security Activities 149 6. Canada Border Services Agency 151 6.1 Relevant Legislation 151 6.2 Mandate 152 6.3 Police Powers of CBSA Officers 154 6.4 CBSA Intelligence 155 6.5 Immigration Detention Facilities 157 6.6 National Security Activities 157 6.6.1 Screening of People Entering Canada 157 6.6.2 Lookouts 157 6.6.3 Advance Passenger Information/ Passenger Name Record Information Program 159 6.6.4 National Risk Assessment Centre 160 6.6.5 Cargo Security Mandate 162 6.6.6 Participation in Integrated Teams 163 6.6.6.1 The CBSA and the RCMP 163 6.6.6.2 The CBSA and Other Agencies and Departments 165 6.7 Information Sharing 166 6.7.1 International Partners 168 7. Citizenship and Immigration Canada 169 7.1 Relevant Legislation 169 7.2 Mandate 169 7.3 National Security Activities 170 7.3.1 Pre-removal Risk Assessments 171 7.4 Information-Sharing Role 172 8. Transport Canada 175 8.1 Relevant Legislation 175 8.2 Mandate 175 8.3 Transport Canada Intelligence 176 8.4 Transport Security Initiatives 177 8.4.1 Maritime Security 177 8.4.1.1 Marine Security Operations Centres 177 8.4.1.2 MIMDEX 178 8.4.2 Aviation Security 179 8.4.2.1 Security Screening 179 8.4.2.2 Air Passenger Scrutiny 179 9. Canadian Air Transport Security Authority 181 9.1 Relevant Legislation 181 9.2 Mandate 181 CONTENTS 5 10. Canadian Coast Guard 183 10.1 Relevant Legislation 183 10.2 Mandate 183 10.3 On-Water Operations in Support of National Security 184 11. Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada 185 11.1 Relevant Legislation 185 11.2 Mandate 186 12. Canada Revenue Agency 189 12.1 Relevant Legislation 189 12.2 National Security Mandate 189 12.3 Information Sharing 190 13. Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada 191 13.1 Relevant Legislation 191 13.2 Mandate 191 13.3 National Security Activities 192 13.3.1 DFAIT Intelligence 193 13.3.2 RCMP Foreign Liaison Officers and Secondees to DFAIT 194 14. Privy Council Office 196 14.1 Mandate 196 14.2 National Security Advisor 196 14.3 Security and Intelligence Secretariat 197 14.4 International Assessment Staff 198 15. Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada 199 15.1 Relevant Legislation 199 15.2 Mandate 200 15.3 National Security Activities 201 15.4 Intelligence and Information Sharing 202 16. Other Federal Departments and Agencies Involved in National Security Operations 203 16.1 Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada 204 16.2 Canadian Food Inspection Agency 205 16.3 Environment Canada 205 16.4 Natural Resources Canada 207 16.5 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 208 16.6 Department of Justice 209 16.7 Treasury Board Secretariat 210 16.8 Department of Finance 210 16.9 Provincial and Municipal Police Forces 210 16.9.1 Federally-Led Permanent Integrated Teams and Ad Hoc Joint-Force Operations 211 16.9.2 Provincially-Led Integrated Anti-terrorism Teams 213 A NEW REVIEW MECHANISM FOR THE RCMP’S 6 NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES 16.9.3 Day-to-Day Interaction 214 16.9.3.1 Examples of Interaction with the RCMP 215 16.9.3.2 Examples of Interaction with CSIS 216 VI REVIEW OF NATIONAL SECURITY ACTIVITIES: THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE 243 1. Introduction 243 2. Law Enforcement Review Bodies 244 2.1 Police Complaints Bodies 244 2.1.1 Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP (CPC) 244 2.1.1.1 Marin and McDonald Commission Reports 244 2.1.1.2 Creation of CPC 247 2.1.1.3 Statutory Framework for CPC 248 2.1.2 Military Police Complaints Commission 253 2.1.2.1 Procedural Powers 255 2.1.3 Provincial Police Review Bodies 257 2.1.3.1 Ontario 257 2.1.3.2 Quebec 260 2.1.3.3 British Columbia’s Variation 262 2.2 Judicial Review of Police Actions 263 3. Security Intelligence Review Bodies 265 3.1 Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) 265 3.1.1 SIRC Mandate and Operations 266 3.1.2 Review 267 3.1.3 Complaints 274 3.1.4 CSIS and RCMP 276 3.1.5 SIRC and Other Review Bodies 278 3.1.6 Obtaining Information 278 3.1.7 Reporting by SIRC 279 3.1.8 Inspector General of CSIS 280 3.2 Office of the Communications Security Establishment Commissioner 281 3.2.1 Review Function 282 3.2.2 Complaints Function 283 3.2.3 Implementation of Recommendations 284 4.
Recommended publications
  • The Canadian Security Intelligence Service: Squaring the Demands of National Security with Canadian Democracy* by Gerard F

    The Canadian Security Intelligence Service: Squaring the Demands of National Security with Canadian Democracy* by Gerard F

    Conflict Quarterly The Canadian Security Intelligence Service: Squaring the Demands of National Security with Canadian Democracy* by Gerard F. Rutan Political truth is always precious in a democracy for it always makes up the first element of justice. Political truth is always suspect in a dictatorship, for it usually makes up the first element of treason. Anon. INTRODUCTION This article is historical in methodology, descriptive/analytic in focus. It was written to offer a primarily European readership an understanding of the origins, development, structure, and functions of the new Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS). Canadians who are, naturally, more familiar with the history and building of the CSIS will find it somewhat basic. Persons knowledgeable in security in­ telligence affairs will find little new or exciting in it. Yet, it is important that this case study of how a democratic state faced a scandal in its security intelligence functions, and came out of the scandal with a new, legal and democratic security intelligence process, be examined and ex­ plained. There are few state systems on earth today which have had the ability and the political will to do what Canada did: to confront an in­ telligence/security scandal and turn it into a strengthening of democracy. The Commission of Inquiry Concerning Certain Activities of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, more popularly known as the McDonald Commission, was established in July 1977. The proximate cause for its establishment was an official statement by the then Commis­ sioner of the RCMP that allegations of participation by the force in il­ legal acts (including the break-in at a Quebec press agency office) might have some basis in fact.1 The Commission acknowledged that some members of the force might have been using methods and procedures not sanctioned by law in the performance of their duties for some time, par­ ticularly those duties associated with national defense and counteres­ pionage or counter-terrorism.
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1

    The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1

    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
  • FINAL VOLUME ONE JUNE 10TH.Indb

    FINAL VOLUME ONE JUNE 10TH.Indb

    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. The opinions expressed in these academic studies are those of the authors; they do not necessarily represent the views of the Commissioner. ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented
  • A New Review Mechanism for the RCMP’S National Security Activities

    A New Review Mechanism for the RCMP’S National Security Activities

    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. A New Review Mechanism for the RCMP’s National Security Activities Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in Relation to Maher Arar © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2006 Cat.
  • Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States

    Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States

    HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM and the INTELLIGENCE POLICY CENTER THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Homeland Security Program RAND Intelligence Policy Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.
  • PSCI-4008A-Jensen-F14.Pdf

    PSCI-4008A-Jensen-F14.Pdf

    Carleton University FALL 2014 Department of Political Science PSCI 4008 A NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE Thursday, 08:35 – 11:25 Please confirm location on Carleton Central Instructor: Dr. Kurt F. Jensen Office: Loeb Bldg B643 Office Hours: Thursday 11:30-12:30. Please make appointment. Other times are possible. Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Phone: (613) 520-2600 Ext. 3214 (no voicemail) Best to contact me through e-mail Purpose of Course: This course is primarily a research seminar, designed to allow students to examine in detail a particular aspect of national security and intelligence in the modern state and to illustrate the impact of intelligence on statecraft. As there is no specific second year course in this area, the course is also designed to provide an overview of the field and acquaint students with the different ways in which modern states deal with the issue of national security. The course has been loosely organized along four themes: Introduction and overview of comparative current and historical structures; Threats and how the state protects itself from those threats; issues related to the protection of individual rights and oversight; and, finally an examination of current issues in intelligence and national security. The focus of the course is to provide an understanding of security and intelligence issues as tools of modern statecraft and to show how these factor into national decision-making as well as illustrating their impact. Requirements: The major requirement for the course is an in-depth and critical essay examining one specific issue or concept related to the topics addressed in the reading list below.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
  • Umcc) Annex Room Government Conference Centre

    Umcc) Annex Room Government Conference Centre

    MINUTES OF THE 7 JUNE 1999 MEETING UNION MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION COMMITTEE (UMCC) ANNEX ROOM GOVERNMENT CONFERENCE CENTRE Chairpersons: Mr. J. Judd, Deputy Minister Mr. M. Sjoquist, National President, Canadian Merchant Service Guild Members: Gen. J.M.G. Baril, Chief of the Defence Staff (absent) VAdm G. Garnett, Vice Chief of the Defence Staff Dr. K. J. Calder, Assistant Deputy Minister (Policy) (absent) LGen R. R. Henault, Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff MGen C. Couture, Acting Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Military) Mr. P. L. Lagueux, Assistant Deputy Minister (Material) VAdm G. R. Maddison, Chief of Maritime Staff LGen W. C. Leach, Chief of Land Staff LGen D. N. Kinsman, Chief of Air Staff Mr. R. M. Emond, Assistant Deputy Minister (Finance and Corporate Services) Mr. R. Westland, Acting Assistant Deputy Minister (Infrastructure and Environment) Mme. M. Boudrias, Assistant Deputy Minister (Human Resources - Civilian) Dr. L. Pearce, Acting DND Chief Information Officer MGen K. G. Penney, Chief of Review Services BGen J. S. T. Pitzul, Judge Advocate General Dr. L. J. Leggat, Chief Research and Development Mr. Y. Côté, DND/CF Legal Advisor Mr. G. Rioux, Director General Public Affairs Mr. J. MacLennan, National President, Union of National Defence Employees Mr. G. Lampron, Vice President, Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada Mr. N. Kemp, President, Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council (East) Mr. D. Quigley, President, Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council (West) Mr. D. Roode, President, Federal Government Dockyard Chargehands Association Mr. B. Taylor, Vice President, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 228 Mr. M.
  • If You Squeeze a “Rat” Hard Enough … It Will Squeal!!

    If You Squeeze a “Rat” Hard Enough … It Will Squeal!!

    If you squeeze a “rat” hard enough … It will squeal!! Wallice Bellair 2013 1 Preface If you squeeze a “rat” hard enough … It will squeal!! And that includes Canadian Senator Larry Campbell, former RCMP officer who confirms he doesn’t give a “shite” about Coroner Inquest results?? Which is quite surprising since this “idiot” was involved in creating the Da Vinci’s Inquest, a Canadian Coroner show filmed in British Columbia, Canada?? How can this “jack-ass” be involved in a Canadian Coroner show when he doesn’t believe in Coroner Inquest results?? And that came out quite clear when Canadian Senator Larry Campbell, former RCMP officer, yawned about the Squamish Inquest results being ignored by the RCMP Commissioner Robert Paulson and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper?? And this “jack-ass” is a Canadian Senator, give us a break!! OOPS – OH YES HE’S AN RCMP OFFICER – THAT SAYS IT ALL!! 2 “RCMP Staff Sgt. Ross Spenard thought he covered his tracks by shredding documents” Incredibly, in another high profile case, another senior RCMP officer lied again and again. The so-called RCMP expert witness, classed an expert witness on blood- pattern analyses, was “accused of perjury and exposed in B.C. Supreme Court as the author of a flawed forensic report that got basic biology wrong.”1 Who was this RCMP Officer? “Staff Sgt. Ross Spenard’s credibility was shredded during the recent second-degree murder trial of Charlie Rae Lincoln, an aboriginal woman convicted of stabbing to death her own two-year-old. He acknowledged misleading the court and failing to send a letter to the Crown in the case revealing the concerns about the report and his errors.”2 RCMP Spenard thought he covered his tracks by shredding documents.
  • Seeking Alternatives: Are Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism Possible?

    Seeking Alternatives: Are Nonviolent Responses to Terrorism Possible?

    Supplement to Peace Sunday Packet 2015 This document is a supplement to MCC Canada’s Peace Sunday Packet for 2015 entitled: “Crossing to the other side: Living as peace of peace in a time of fear and terror.” It was prepared by Jennifer Wiebe, Director, and Rebekah Sears, Policy Analyst, for MCC’s Ottawa Office. Seeking alternatives: Are nonviolent responses to terrorism possible? We live in a context of growing fear—fear about terrorism. “Over-reaction to terrorism, it should be Few terms have so furtively made their way into our daily discourse. Yet while the remembered, specter of terrorism has gained a sense of urgency in our homes, churches, and communities, most of us have only a vague impression of what it is. The word is a fundamental “terrorism” has been used in distinct ways throughout the centuries to describe a objective of most wide range of actions and actors. First popularized during the French Revolution terrorists in history. (1793-94) when it was used (rather positively!) to describe the methods wielded We should not by the revolutionary state, the term “terrorism” has since shifted to describe anti- accommodate their government activity (such as the anti-colonial movements of the 1950s and 1960s), goals in this regard.” and, more recently, nebulous movements that have political causes and networks beyond national borders (such as al Qaeda and ISIS). James Judd, Director of the Canadian Security Despite decades of formal attempts through the United Nations and other Intelligence Service bodies, the international community has failed to come to a consensus on a universal definition for the word “terrorism.” Indeed, shifting terminology—such as “insurgency,” “terrorism,” and “violent extremism”—identifies the complex challenge of violence today.1 While there is no consensus definition, however, virtually all experts point to two identifying components of “terrorism:” the targeting of civilians and the cultivation of fear.
  • Canada's Inadequate Response to Terrorism: the Need for Policy

    Canada's Inadequate Response to Terrorism: the Need for Policy

    Fraser Institute Digital Publication February 2006 Canada’s Inadequate Response to Terrorism: The Need for Policy Reform by Martin Collacott CONTENTS Executive Summary / 2 Introduction / 3 The Presence of Terrorists in Canada / 4 An Ineffective Response to the Terrorism Threat / 6 New Legislation and Policies / 16 Problems Dealing with Terrorists in Canada / 21 Where Security Needs To Be Strengthened / 27 Problems with the Refugee Determination System / 30 Permanent Residents and Visitors’ Visas / 52 Canada Not Taking a Tough Line on Terrorism / 60 Making Clear What We Expect of Newcomers / 63 Working With the Muslim Community / 69 Concluding Comments and Recommendations / 80 Appendix A: Refugee Acceptance Rates / 87 References / 88 About the Author / 100 About this Publication / 101 About The Fraser Institute / 102 Canada’s Inadequate Response to Terrorism 2 Executive Summary Failure to exercise adequate control over the entry and the departure of non-Canadians on our territory has been a significant factor in making Canada a destination for terror- ists. The latter have made our highly dysfunctional refugee determination system the channel most often used for gaining entry. A survey that we made based on media reports of 25 Islamic terrorists and suspects who entered Canada as adults indicated that 16 claimed refugee status, four were admitted as landed immigrants and the channel of entry for the remaining five was not identified. Making a refugee claim is used by both ter- rorists and criminals as a means of rendering their removal from the country more difficult. In addition to examining specific shortcomings of current policies, this paper will also look at the reasons why the government has not rectified them.
  • 104-10431-10126.Pdf

    104-10431-10126.Pdf

    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com I I .u.~. ..., CONFIDENTIAL NOFORN NOCONTRAC~ DRAFT May 1992 A REVIEW OF COUNTERINTELLIGENCE LITERATURE. 1975 - 1992 By Cleveland c. Cram ·BOTE: ~inal version will have proper page breaks, etc. CONFIDENTIAL NOFORN NOCONTRACT 13-00000 CONFIDENTIAL NOFORN NOCONTRA~T REVIEW OF COQNTERIHTELLIGEHCE LITEBATQRE. 1975 - 1992 Foreword The review of counterintelligence literature, 1975 - 1992, which follows is not meant to include every book published concerning espionage and/or counterintelligence from the period 1975 until 1992. The object of this study is to focus on a relatively small selection of books that were influential because of the views they expressed and_/, their reasonable degree of historical accuracy ~~stly concentrate on the major counterintelligence issues of the I( period and ~ highlight~~ the of James Angleton and Anatole Golitsyn, which from 1962 were a compelling force in Western counterintelligence services. \?The scope of the study is largely limited to books about the American, British, and Canadian intelligence and security services although it in some instances touches on countries . j , of Western Europe such as France, West Germany, Norway, etc. ' J r LJ.~,._i.vt- ~ \ -""r Recent books such as Corson and Trento 1 s Widows cure m;aladed _,_ because they are not reputable by even the gener~}~:; ;~~ ( ..