DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report 1.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report 1.P65 INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE HOLOCAUST IN ROMANIA FINAL REPORT www.polirom.ro Editura POLIROM Ia[i, B-dul Carol I nr. 4, P.O. BOX 266, 700506 Bucure[ti, B-dul I.C. Br\tianu nr. 6, et. 7, ap. 33, O.P. 37, P.O. BOX 1-728, 030174 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Na]ionale a României: INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE HOLOCAUST IN ROMANIA (Bucure[ti) Final Report / International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania; president of the commission: Elie Wiesel; ed. Tuvia Friling, Radu Ioanid, Mihail E. Ionescu. Ia[i: Polirom, 2004 ISBN: 973-681-989-2 I. Wiesel, Elie (pre[ed.) II. Friling, Tuvia (ed.) III. Ioanid, Radu (ed.) IV. Ionescu, Mihail E. (ed.) 323.1(=411.16)(498)1939/1945 94(=411.16)(498)1939/1945 Printed in ROMANIA President of the Commission: Elie Wiesel Editors: Tuvia Friling, Radu Ioanid, Mihail E. Ionescu POLIROM 2004 The members of the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania: Chairman: Elie Wiesel Vice-chairmen: Tuvia Friling (State Archivist of Israel), Radu Ioanid (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum) and Mihail E. Ionescu (Institute for Political Defense and Military History, Bucharest) Members: Ioan Scurtu (Commission secretary Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, Bucharest), Viorel Achim (Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, Bucharest), Jean Ancel (Yad Vashem, Jerusa- lem), Colette Avital (member of the Israeli Parliament), Andrew Baker (American Jewish Commit- tee), Lya Benjamin (Center for the Study of Jewish History, Bucharest), Liviu Beris (Association of the Survivors of the Holocaust in Romania), Randolph Braham (City University of New York), Irina Cajal Marin (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), Adrian Cioflânca (A.D. Xenopol Institute of History, Iasi), Ioan Ciuperca (Al.I. Cuza University, Iasi), Alexandru Elias (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), Alexandru Florian (Dimitrie Cantemir University, Bucharest), Mihai Dinu Gheorghiu (Centre de Sociologie Européenne, Paris), Hildrun Glass (Ludwig-Maximilians Universitaet, Munich), Menachem Hacohen (Chief Rabbi of Ro- mania), Vasile Ionescu (Aven Amentza Roma Center), Corneliu Mihai Lungu (National Archives of Romania), Daniel S. Mariaschin (Bnai Brith International), Victor Opaschi (Presidential Counselor), Andrei Pippidi (University of Bucharest), Ambassador Meir Rosenne (Israel), Liviu Rotman (University of Tel Aviv), Michael Shafir (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty), Paul Shapiro (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum), William Totok (Arbeitskreis fuer Geschichte, Ger- many), Raphael Vago (University of Tel Aviv), George Voicu (National School for Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest), Leon Volovici (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) (Government Decision no. 672/May 5, 2004, published in Monitorul Oficial al Rom^niei, no. 436/ May 17, 2004) Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................. 7 Speech Given by Mr. Ion Iliescu, President of Romania, at the Meeting Dedicated to the Holocaust Remembrance Day in Romania October 12, 2004 ................................. 9 Message from Elie Wiesel, Chairman of the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania ................................................................................. 15 Message of President Traian Bãsescu at the Ceremony for the Commemoration of the Martyr Jews Killed on January 21-22, 1941 ....................... 17 Background and Precursors to the Holocaust. Roots of Romanian Anti-Semitism. The League of National Christian Defense and Iron Guard Anti-Semitism. The Anti-Semitic Policies of the Goga Government and of the Royal Dictatorship ................................................................................. 19 Romanian-German Relations before and during the Holocaust ........................................ 57 The June-July 1940 Romanian Withdrawal from Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina and Its Consequences on Interethnic Relations in Romania ............. 71 Anti-Semitic Propaganda and Official Rhetoric concerning the Judeo-Bolshevik Danger: Romanian Jews and Communism between 1938-1944 ............ 89 The Holocaust in Romania ................................................................................... 109 The Exclusion of Jews from Romanian Society during the Antonescu Governments with and without the Iron Guard: Anti-Semitic Legislation, Romanianization and Expropriation ........................................................................ 181 The Life of Jewish Community under Ion Antonescu and the Jewish Communitys Response to the Holocaust in Romania ............................. 205 The Deportation of the Roma and Their Treatment in Transnistria ................................ 223 The Role of Ion Antonescu in the Planning and Implementation of Anti-Semitic and Anti-Roma policies of the Romanian State..................................... 243 The Holocaust in Northern Transylvania ................................................................. 255 Solidarity and Rescue. Romanian Righteous among the Nations ................................ 283 Trials of the War Criminals .................................................................................. 313 Distortion, Negationism, and Minimalization of the Holocaust in Postwar Romania .......... 333 Findings and Recommendations ............................................................................. 381 Afterword ......................................................................................................... 391 Index ............................................................................................................. 395 Foreword On the initiative of Mr. Ion Iliescu, President of Romania, the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania was established on October 22, 2003. The Commission was conceived from the very beginning as an independent research body, free of any influence and political considera- tion. The Commissions budget and composition were approved under Government Decisions no. 227 of February 20, 2004, and no. 672 of May 5, 2004, respectively. At the invitation of the President of Romania, Mr. Elie Wiesel, Nobel Peace Prize laureate and honorary member of the Romanian Academy, accepted the chairmanship of the Commission. The Commissions aim was to research the facts and determine the truth about the Holocaust in Romania during World War II and the events preceding this tragedy. The results of the research by the Commission are presented in this Report, based exclusively on scientific standards. The Commission met three times in Washington from May 16 to May 22, 2004, in Jerusalem from September 6 to September 9, 2004, and in Bucharest from November 8 to November 13, 2004 to evaluate the state of research and draft the Final Report. On November 11, 2004, the Final Report of the International Commission on the Holocaust in Romania was presented to the President of Romania. We hope that the Commissions conclusions and recommendations will promote the education on and understanding of the Holocaust among all citizens, and particularly the youth of Romania, as well as contribute to further research on the subject. Besides Mr. Elie Wiesel, the Commission included respected experts in history, the humani- ties, and the social sciences from Romania and abroad, survivors of the Holocaust, representatives of national and international Jewish and Roma organizations and representatives of the Romanian Presidency: Tuvia Friling (State Archivist of Israel), Radu Ioanid (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum) and Mihail E. Ionescu (Institute for Political Defense and Military History, Bucharest) vice-chairmen; Ioan Scurtu (Commission secretary Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, Bucharest), Viorel Achim (Nicolae Iorga Institute of History, Bucharest), Jean Ancel (Yad Vashem, Jerusalem), Colette Avital (member of the Israeli Parliament), Andrew Baker (American Jewish Committee), Lya Benjamin (Center for the Study of Jewish History, Bucharest), Liviu Beris (Association of the Survivors of the Holocaust in Romania), Randolph Braham (City University of New York), Irina Cajal Marin (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), Adrian Cioflâncã (A.D. Xenopol Institute of History, Iaºi), Ioan Ciupercã (Al.I. Cuza Univer- sity, Iaºi), Alexandru Elias (Federation of Jewish Communities of Romania), Alexandru Florian (Dimitrie Cantemir University, Bucharest), Mihai Dinu Gheorghiu (Centre de Sociologie Européenne, Paris), Hildrun Glass (Ludwig-Maximilians Universitaet, Munich), Menachem Hacohen (Chief Rabbi of Romania), Vasile Ionescu (Aven Amentza Roma Center), Corneliu Mihai Lungu (National Archives of Romania), Daniel S. Mariaschin (Bnai Brith International), Victor Opaschi (Presidential Counselor), Andrei Pippidi (University of Bucharest), Ambassador Meir Rosenne (Israel), Liviu Rotman (University of Tel Aviv), Michael Shafir (Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty), Paul Shapiro (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum), William Totok (Arbeitskreis fuer Geschichte, Germany), Raphael Vago (University of Tel Aviv), George Voicu (National School for Political and Administrative Studies, Bucharest), Leon Volovici (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) members. Speech Given by Mr. Ion Iliescu, President of Romania, at the Meeting Dedicated to the Holo- caust Remembrance Day in Romania October 12, 2004 Messrs. Presidents of the Legislative Bodies, Your Holiness, Father Patriarch, Your Eminence, Chief Rabbi, Honorable religious leaders, Ladies and gentlemen, Ambassadors,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trials of the War Criminals
    TRIALS OF THE WAR CRIMINALS General Considerations The Fascist regime that ruled Romania between September 14, 1940, and August 23, 1944, was brought to justice in Bucharest in May 1946, and after a short trial, its principal leaders—Ion and Mihai Antonescu and two of their closest assistants—were executed, while others were sentenced to life imprisonment or long terms of detention. At that time, the trial’s verdicts seemed inevitable, as they indeed do today, derived inexorably from the defendants’ decisions and actions. The People’s Tribunals functioned for a short time only. They were disbanded on June 28, 1946,1 although some of the sentences were not pronounced until sometime later. Some 2,700 cases of suspected war criminals were examined by a commission formed of “public prosecutors,”2 but only in about half of the examined cases did the commission find sufficient evidence to prosecute, and only 668 were sentenced, many in absentia.3 There were two tribunals, one in Bucharest and one in Cluj. It is worth mentioning that the Bucharest tribunal sentenced only 187 people.4 The rest were sentenced by the tribunal in Cluj. One must also note that, in general, harsher sentences were pronounced by the Cluj tribunal (set up on June 22, 1 Marcel-Dumitru Ciucă, “Introducere” in Procesul maresalului Antonescu (Bucharest: Saeculum and Europa Nova, 1995-98), vol. 1: p. 33. 2 The public prosecutors were named by communist Minister of Justice Lucret iu Pătrăşcanu and most, if not all of them were loyal party members, some of whom were also Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Exceptional Floods in the Prut Basin, Romania, in the Context of Heavy
    1 Exceptional floods in the Prut basin, Romania, in the context of 2 heavy rains in the summer of 2010 3 4 Gheorghe Romanescu1, Cristian Constantin Stoleriu 5 Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iasi, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of 6 Geography, Bd. Carol I, 20 A, 700505 Iasi, Romania 7 8 Abstract. The year 2010 was characterized by devastating flooding in Central and Eastern 9 Europe, including Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina. This 10 study focuses on floods that occurred during the summer of 2010 in the Prut River basin, 11 which has a high percentage of hydrotechnical infrastructure. Strong floods occurred in 12 eastern Romania on the Prut River, which borders the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, and 13 the Siret River. Atmospheric instability from 21 June-1 July 2010 caused remarkable amounts 14 of rain, with rates of 51.2 mm/50 min and 42.0 mm/30 min. In the middle Prut basin, there are 15 numerous ponds that help mitigate floods as well as provide water for animals, irrigation, and 16 so forth. The peak discharge of the Prut River during the summer of 2010 was 2,310 m3/s at 17 the Radauti Prut gauging station. High discharges were also recorded on downstream 18 tributaries, including the Baseu, Jijia, and Miletin. High discharges downstream occurred 19 because of water from the middle basin and the backwater from the Danube (a historic 20 discharge of 16,300 m3/s). The floods that occurred in the Prut basin in the summer of 2010 21 could not be controlled completely because the discharges far exceeded foreseen values.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economy of a Regional Metropolis. Case-Study: Iaşi, Romania*1
    THE ECONOMY OF A REGIONAL METROPOLIS. CASE-STUDY: IAŞI, ROMANIA*1 Claudia POPESCU Claudia POPESCU Professor, Faculty of International Economics and Business, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Tel.: 0040-213-319.1900/378 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The city of Iaşi with a population of over 300,000 people is the biggest European Union city at the border with the former-Soviet space. The article, part of an extended study on territorial development of Iaşi and its peri-urban area, focuses on the role of the city to trigger regional growth and to enhance cross border cooperation. Recent processes at work generating economic cohesion and integration are explored drawing on the catalytic factors of development and the specialization of local economies. The paper discusses also the externalities of urban growth such as the urban sprawl that causes land use conflicts at the rural-urban fringe. It argues that human capital and higher birth rates than the national average are the strengths, and low connectivity and accessibility are the weaknesses for regional growth. The regional polarization of the city is based on the supply of high level services over the entire North-East Region and opportunities to cross border cooperation through the expansion of an agro-alimentary supply-chain are highlighted. Building on the main capabilities and assets of the * The paper is part of the research conducted between 2009 agglomeration economies of Iaşi, the paper finally and 2010 in the view of drafting the Master Plan of the Iaşi identifies some of the mechanisms and structures Municipality, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe
    Between Denial and "Comparative Trivialization": Holocaust Negationism in Post-Communist East Central Europe Michael Shafir Motto: They used to pour millet on graves or poppy seeds To feed the dead who would come disguised as birds. I put this book here for you, who once lived So that you should visit us no more Czeslaw Milosz Introduction* Holocaust denial in post-Communist East Central Europe is a fact. And, like most facts, its shades are many. Sometimes, denial comes in explicit forms – visible and universally-aggressive. At other times, however, it is implicit rather than explicit, particularistic rather than universal, defensive rather than aggressive. And between these two poles, the spectrum is large enough to allow for a large variety of forms, some of which may escape the eye of all but the most versatile connoisseurs of country-specific history, culture, or immediate political environment. In other words, Holocaust denial in the region ranges from sheer emulation of negationism elsewhere in the world to regional-specific forms of collective defense of national "historic memory" and to merely banal, indeed sometime cynical, attempts at the utilitarian exploitation of an immediate political context.1 The paradox of Holocaust negation in East Central Europe is that, alas, this is neither "good" nor "bad" for the Jews.2 But it is an important part of the * I would like to acknowledge the support of the J. and O. Winter Fund of the Graduate Center of the City University of New York for research conducted in connection with this project. I am indebted to friends and colleagues who read manuscripts of earlier versions and provided comments and corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • BULETINUL ARHIVELOR MILITARE ROMÂNE Anulxxi , Nr
    BULETINUL ARHIVELOR MILITARE ROMÂNE AnulXXI , nr. 1 ( 79 ) /2018 • Cuvânt pentru unirea neamului românesc • Corpul 6 Armată în Basarabia • Prizonieri români în Bulgaria http://smap .mapn.ro/ AMNR/index.html ARHIVELE MILITARE NAŢIONALE ROMÂNE SUMAR EDITORIAL Buletinul Arhivelor Militare Rom@ne Anul XXI, nr. 1 (79)/2018 Director fondator Centenarul –E, xamenul nostru de maturitate Prof. univ. Dr. Valeriu Florin DOBRINESCU (1943-2003) Colonel(r) D r. Mircea TĂNASE 1 Publica]ie recunoscut` de c`tre Consiliul Na]ional al Cercet`rii {tiin]ifice din |nv`]`m@ntul Superior [i inclus` \n categoria „D”, cod 241 STUDII/DOCUMENTE Coperta I: Regele Ferdinand I şi Structuri militare române care au purtat denumiri Regina Maria ale unor personalităţi princiare, regale, politice şi militare autohtone şi străine între anii 1859-1947, Colonel Dr. Gabriel-George PĂTRAŞCU 3 Coperta IV : 1918. Regina Mariaş i Principele Carol – participanţ i la comemorarea De la armata austro-ungară la armata română – eroilor de la Coş na – GMŞ,eneralul de brigadă iron erb Cireş oaia Plutonier adjutant Eugen-Dorin SPĂTARU 11 Editor coordonator: Colonel Adrian GRIGORE O poveste adevărată Redactor-ş ef: Dr.Teodora GIURGIU RegeleFIC erdinand – uvânt pentru unirea Tel./fax:67 021-318.53.85, 021-318.53.67/03 neamului românesc (partea I,) [email protected] Redactor-ş ef adjunct: Neculai MOGHIOR 17 Dr. Ion RÎŞNOVEANU Secretar de redacţ: ie Războiul de Întregire văzut din linia a doua. Dr. Veronica BONDAR Redactori: CCC,azul căpitanului veterinar onstantin osma Mihaela CĂLIN, Lucian DR Ă GHICI, Dr. Anca Oana OTU, Lector universitar asociat Dr. Alin SPÂNU 43 colonelD r.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Records Related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party RG-25.059M
    Selected records related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party RG-25.059M United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW Washington, DC 20024-2126 Tel. (202) 479-9717 e-mail: [email protected] Descriptive summary Title: Selected records related to A.C. Cuza and the National Christian Party Dates: 1834-1948 (inclusive) 1934-1943 (bulk) Accession number: 2009.267 Creator: Partidul Naţional Creştin. Liga Apărării Naţional Creştine Extent: 7,535 digital images 7 microfilm reels (digitized) Repository: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives, 100 Raoul Wallenberg Place SW, Washington, DC 20024-2126 Languages: Romanian Scope and content of collection Contains records relating to A. C. Cuza, a leading anti-Semite in Romania and the leader of the National Christian Party (PNC) which was in power December 1937 to February 1938. Also contains records relating to Istrate Micescu, the Justice Minister of the PNC administration. Administrative Information Restrictions on access: No restrictions on access. Restrictions on reproduction and use: Restrictions on use. Fair use only. Use only for scientific purposes (not for commercial use) Preferred citation: Preferred citation for USHMM archival collections; consult the USHMM website for guidance. Acquisition information: Source of acquisition is the Arhivele Naţionale ale României (Romanian National Archives), Fond personal A.C. Cuza (inv. 1139) and Fond personal Istrate Miscescu. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives received the collection via the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum International Archives Program in November, 2009. Existence and location of originals: Arhivele Naţionale ale României Historical note The National-Christian Defense League (Romanian: Liga Apararii National Crestine or LANC) was a virulently anti-Semitic political party of Romania formed by A.
    [Show full text]
  • Descărcați Documentul
    CRISIA 2017 Redactor responsabil al Dr. Aurel Chiriac publicaţiilor Muzeului Ţării Crişurilor Colegiul de redacţie: Dr. Gabriel Moisa – secretar de redacţie Bord editorial (membri): Dr. Florina Ciure, Drd. Gruia Fazecaş Consiliul ştiinţific: Prof. univ. dr. Cesare Alzati – Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Milano Prof. univ. dr. Mihai Bărbulescu – Universitatea Babeş- Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Academician Nicolae Edroiu – Institutul de Istorie „George Bariţ”, Cluj-Napoca Dr. György Feiszt – Vas County Archives of Szombathely Prof. univ. dr. Gianfranco Giraudo – Universitatea Ca’ Foscari din Veneţia Prof. univ. dr. Ovidiu Ghitta – Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. univ. dr. Francesco Leoncini – Universitatea Ca’Foscari din Veneţia Cercetător Ştiinţific I, Dr. Florin Gogâltan – Institutul de Arheologie şi Istoria Artei al Academiei Române, Cluj-Napoca Dr. Gizella Nemeth – Sodalitas Adriatico-Danubiana, Duino Aurisina Prof. univ. dr. Adriano Papo – Universitatea din Udine Academician Ioan-Aurel Pop – Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Prof. univ. dr. Doru Radosav – Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj-Napoca Dr. Matteo Taufer – Universitatea din Leipzig Orice corespondenţă se va MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR adresa/ Toute correspondance 410464 ORADEA sera envoyée à l’adresse/ Please Bld. Dacia nr. 1-3 send any mail to the following ROMÂNIA address/ Richten sie bitte Tel/Fax: 0259479918 jedwelche korrespondenz an E-mail: [email protected] die adresse ISSN: 1016 – 2798 Fondator: Sever Dumitraşcu (1971) © Copyright by Muzeul Ţării Crişurilor Punctele de vedere exprimate în materialele publicate aparţin în exclusivitate autorilor MUZEUL ŢĂRII CRIŞURILOR C R I S I A XLVII ORADEA 2017 SUMAR (SOMMAIRE – SUMMARY – INHALT) GRUIA FAZECAŞ, CRISTINA ELENA CORDOŞ, MARIAN LIE O aşezare neolitică inedită descoperită la Şişterea „Bangeta”, com.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage, Landscape and Conflict Archaeology
    THE EDGE OF EUROPE: HERITAGE, LANDSCAPE AND CONFLICT ARCHAEOLOGY by ROXANA-TALIDA ROMAN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The research presented in this thesis addresses the significance of Romanian WWI sites as places of remembrance and heritage, by exploring the case of Maramureș against the standards of national and international heritage standards. The work provided the first ever survey of WWI sites on the Eastern Front, showing that the Prislop Pass conflictual landscape holds undeniable national and international heritage value both in terms of physical preservation and in terms of mapping on the memorial-historical record. The war sites demonstrate heritage and remembrance value by meeting heritage criteria on account of their preservation state, rarity, authenticity, research potential, the embedded war knowledge and their historical-memorial functions. The results of the research established that the war sites not only satisfy heritage legal requirements at various scales but are also endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • Caietele CNSAS, Nr. 2 (20) / 2017
    Caietele CNSAS Revistă semestrială editată de Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii Minoritatea evreiască din România (I) Anul X, nr. 2 (20)/2017 Editura CNSAS Bucureşti 2018 Consiliul Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii Bucureşti, str. Matei Basarab, nr. 55-57, sector 3 www.cnsas.ro Caietele CNSAS, anul X, nr. 2 (20)/2017 ISSN: 1844-6590 Consiliu ştiinţific: Dennis Deletant (University College London) Łukasz Kamiński (University of Wroclaw) Gail Kligman (University of California, Los Angeles) Dragoş Petrescu (University of Bucharest & CNSAS) Vladimir Tismăneanu (University of Maryland, College Park) Virgiliu-Leon Ţârău (Babeş-Bolyai University & CNSAS) Katherine Verdery (The City University of New York) Pavel Žáček (Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes, Prague) Colegiul de redacţie: Elis Pleșa (coordonator număr tematic) Liviu Bejenaru Silviu B. Moldovan Liviu Ţăranu (editor) Coperta: Cătălin Mândrilă Machetare computerizată: Liviu Ţăranu Rezumate și corectură text în limba engleză: Gabriela Toma Responsabilitatea pentru conţinutul materialelor aparţine autorilor. Editura Consiliului Naţional pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securităţii e-mail: [email protected] CUPRINS I. Studii Natalia LAZĂR, Evreitate, antisemitism și aliya. Interviu cu Liviu Rotman, prof. univ. S.N.S.P.A. (1 decembrie 2017)………………………………7 Lya BENJAMIN, Ordinul B’nei Brith în România (I.O.B.B.). O scurtă istorie …………………………………………………………………............................25 Florin C. STAN, Aspecte privind emigrarea evreilor din U.R.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The End of the Slovak Army Epic on the Eastern Front and the Change of the Romanian Strategy Towards Bratislava
    THE END OF THE SLOVAK ARMY EPIC ON THE EASTERN FRONT AND THE CHANGE OF THE ROMANIAN STRATEGY TOWARDS BRATISLAVA Radu Florian BRUJA Ștefan cel Mare University of Suceava (Romania) E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. This analysis considers the way in which Romania managed the more and more complex relations within the Axis during the year 1943. At the beginning of the year, the military situation on the Eastern front had changed substantially. Germany's defeat at Stalingrad had changed the relation between Germany and its allies. The tension between Germany and Romania, on the one hand, and between Slovakia and Hungary on the other hand, would also mark the relations within the Axis. However, the armies of the three allies continued to support the German war effort. The Slovak Rapid Division participated during the year in the military defensive operations of the Crimean Peninsula. Its effort led to the erosion of the combat capabilities, especially after the disaster caused by the Battle of Kakhovka. Instead, the Slovakian army had to face an unprecedented number of defections. The Slovak soldiers moving to the enemy had forced the Germans to disband the Rapid Divi- sion, some of which being sent to the Italian front and the other to the labour force. Never- theless, Romanian-Slovak relations continued to be good. The change in the Romanian strat- egy having as its main objective to restore the Transylvania’s border, will force Bucharest to maintain the best possible relations with Slovakia. Keywords: Slovak army, Rapid Division, Crimean Peninsula, Eastern Front, deserters Rezumat: Sfârșitul epopeii armatei slovace pe Frontul de Est și schimbarea strategiei românești față de Bratislava.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic, Military and Economic Actions of Romania for the Purpose of Exiting the United Nations War
    European Integration - Realities and Perspectives. Proceedings 2020 Diplomatic, Military and Economic Actions of Romania for the Purpose of Exiting the United Nations War Stefan Gheorghe1 Abstract: Romania’s entry into war with Germany on June 22nd, 1941, would come after two years of neutrality and non-belligerence, time when the Romanian external policy direction would be pro-German. The years 1943 - 1944 marked the turning point of the war development, the United Nations succeeding in taking the strategic initiative to the detriment of Nazi Germany and its satellites. The political and military disaster that Romania was facing would require the reorientation of its external policy, aiming at bringing the country out of the war as quickly as possible and signing the armistice (Baciu, 1996, pp. 103- 104; Onişoru, 1996, pp. 49-50). The considerable deterioration of the military situation on the Eastern Front, would contribute to the achievement of the “united opposition”, seeking, to obtain conditions as favorable as possible for Romania, for signing the armistice. The diplomatic action of the opposition benefited from the support of King Mihai, but the peace signing initiatives were carried out simultaneously also by the Bucharest regime, which, through direct negotiations with the Allies, pursued the same political goals. Keywords: Romanian external policy; United Nations armies; Red Army The years 1943 - 1944 marked the turning point of the Second World War, the United Nations armies succeeding in taking the strategic initiative on the front, to the detriment of Nazi Germany and its satellites. The political and military disaster that Romania was facing would require the reorientation of its external policy, aiming at bringing the country out of the war as quickly as possible and signing the armistice (Baciu, 1996, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Abundant Precipitations of 22-27 July 2008 in the North and North-East Moldova
    PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, NR. 3, 2009 IMPACT OF THE ABUNDANT PRECIPITATIONS OF 22-27 JULY 2008 IN THE NORTH AND NORTH-EAST MOLDOVA Liviu Apostol1, Ovidiu Machidon2 Key words: abundant precipitations, floods, damages Abstract: In the last decade of the month of July 2008, the appearance and the persistence of a retrograde cyclone for a few days in the northern and northeastern area of Moldova determined the production of precipitations that had especially high intensity and that were taken over by the Prut and Siret Rivers and their tributaries. The high flow of the Siret River’s tributaries was mainly caused by the large quantities of precipitations fallen in the area in contact with the higher flanks of the Carpathians. The flash flood flow registered a few days later by the Prut River at the entrance to Romania was mainly caused by the rains fallen in the southwestern area of Ukraine. This paper presents the evolution of the process, quantities registered by the meteorological stations and the rain-gauge stations, the hydrological consequences and the impact of these pluviometric events on the environment of the northern and northeastern Moldova. Floods of the end of July and beginning of August 2009, in the northeastern part of Romania follow closely those of the end of 2005. The last decade witnessed in this area a succession without precedent of very hot and dry periods and rainy periods, some of them constituting records of the entire observation period. The cause was, as for the majority of Moldova catastrophic floods, a retrograde cyclone.
    [Show full text]