UNITED NATIONS Security Council

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UNITED NATIONS Security Council UNITED S NATIONS Security Council Distr. GENERAL S/AC.26/2001/21 28 September 2001 Original: ENGLISH UNITED NATIONS COMPENSATION COMMISSION GOVERNING COUNCIL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BY THE PANEL OF COMMISSIONERS CONCERNING THE TWENTY-FIRST INSTALMENT OF “E3” CLAIMS GE.01-64959 S/AC.26/2001/21 Page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction ..................................................................................................................................1 - 4 7 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY................................................................................................5 - 10 7 A. The procedural history of the claims in the twenty-first instalment...................................5 - 8 7 B. The claimants ....................................................................................................................9 - 10 8 II. GEOTÉCNICA SA............................................................................................................11 - 61 10 A. Contract losses .................................................................................................................13 - 19 10 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................13 - 16 10 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................17 - 18 11 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 19 11 B. Business transaction or course of dealing ........................................................................20 - 25 11 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................20 - 23 11 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................... 24 12 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 25 12 C. Loss of profits ..................................................................................................................26 - 37 12 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................26 - 31 12 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................32 - 36 12 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 37 13 D. Loss of tangible property .................................................................................................38 - 45 13 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................38 - 41 13 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................42 - 44 14 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 45 14 E. Payment or relief to others...............................................................................................46 - 53 14 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................46 - 49 14 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................50 - 52 15 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 53 15 F. Financial losses ................................................................................................................54 - 60 15 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................54 - 57 15 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................58 - 59 16 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 60 16 G. Summary of recommended compensation for Geotécnica ................................................. 61 16 III. GEOTEHNIKA ..................................................................................................................... 62 17 IV. CHARILAOS APOSTOLIDIS & CO. LTD......................................................................63 - 89 18 A. Contract losses .................................................................................................................65 - 71 18 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................65 - 67 18 S/AC.26/2001/21 Page 3 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................68 - 70 18 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 71 19 B. Business transaction or course of dealing ........................................................................72 - 77 19 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................72 - 74 19 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................75 - 76 19 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 77 20 C. Loss of profits/overhead...................................................................................................78 - 81 20 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................78 - 79 20 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................... 80 20 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 81 20 D. Loss of tangible property .................................................................................................82 - 88 20 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................82 - 83 20 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................84 - 87 21 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 88 21 E. Summary of recommended compensation for Charilaos .................................................... 89 21 V. ED ZÜBLIN AG (CONTRACT CLAIM) ........................................................................90 - 105 22 A. Contract losses .................................................................................................................92 - 99 22 1. Facts and contentions..................................................................................................92 - 96 22 2. Analysis and valuation................................................................................................97 - 98 23 3. Recommendation ........................................................................................................... 99 23 B. Subsidiary motion ..........................................................................................................100 - 104 23 1. Facts and contentions................................................................................................100 - 102 23 2. Analysis and valuation.................................................................................................. 103 23 3. Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 104 24 C. Summary of recommended compensation for Ed Züblin .................................................. 105 24 VI. ED ZÜBLIN AG (BANK ACCOUNT CLAIM) .............................................................106 - 116 25 A. Financial losses ..............................................................................................................109 - 115 25 1. Facts and contentions................................................................................................109 - 112 25 2. Analysis and valuation..............................................................................................113 - 114 25 3. Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 115 26 B. Summary of recommended compensation for Ed Züblin .................................................. 116 26 VII. SCHEU & WIRTH AG....................................................................................................117 - 124 27 A. Contract losses ...............................................................................................................120 - 123 27 1. Facts and contentions................................................................................................120 - 121 27 2. Analysis and valuation.................................................................................................. 122 27 3. Recommendation .......................................................................................................... 123 28 B. Summary of
Recommended publications
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kirkuk Sulymaniya Railway Project
    Journal of Engineering and Development, Vol. 17, No.2, 2013, ISSN 1813‐ 7822 Cost-Benefit Analysis of Kirkuk Sulymaniya Railway Project Lect. Dr. Ali J. Kadhim Lect. Dr.Mohmmad B. Abdljabar Highway and Transportation Dep College of Engineering Univ. of Mustansiriyah Lect. Shatha S. Kareem Highway and Transportation Dep College of Engineering Univ. of Mustansiriyah Abstract The railway network is considered one of the major stone in the economic skeleton in most countries. Herein, the user benefit was investigated when a new railway track is to be installed between Kirkuk and Sulymaniya cities in the north of Iraq. The operating costs of the new railway line are compared with the existing transportation modes that depend only on multilane highway between the two cities. The analysis was done using the related parameters that involved in the cost benefit procedures, beside that this project have the ability of joining Iran with Iraq and consequently joining the Iraqi railways. The results show that when the construction and other initial costs are added the economic evaluation is negative and results no user benefit, while in the real world there are impacts on the development of the society when such transportation projects are installed. This paper concluded that there is a great user benefit in the proposed project when the operating, accidents, time saving costs and the ecological effects are considered, with the excluding of the initial costs as in the case of the roadway construction. This study aims to understanding the effect of adding a new mode of travel (railway travel) and compare its effect with the existing modes (roadway travel) by using the cost-benefit analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Railroad Reconstruction: a Success Story with Al Qarya Group
    Research and Innovative Technology Administration Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration Fall 2008 contents Fall 2008 on the frontier 3 Iraq Railroad Reconstruction: A Success Story across the department 5 RITA Supports U.S. Priorities with China BTS Examines U.S./China Freight Trade HORIZONS is a publication of the U.S. Department of 5 Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration. Improving Operational Safety—Confi dential 6 Cover photo courtesy of Agata Urbaniak Close Call Reporting ITS happenings 7 Innovation Roundtable Explores Advanced Wireless Communication to Meet the Nation’s Congestion Reduction and Safety Goals 7 Safetrip-21 Update university news 8 Conferences Put the Spotlight on University Transportation Centers 8 Utah Transit a True "FrontRunner" with WiFi Aboard 9 TTI Website a Unique Resource on Transportation Funding Options p. Center Volpe guest column 3 13 The New DNA of the Automobile by Larry Burns, Transmission tower at Hilla, Vice President, Research & Development and Karbala province in Iraq. Strategic Planning General Motors Corporation in every issue new tools & training 14 New TSI Motorcycle Safety Course Helps 9 Your National State-Level Planners Transportation Library 10 RITA Happenings statistical news 12 Technology Transfer 15 From the Bureau of Transportation 17 Check it out at Statistics www.RITA.dot.gov! on the frontier Iraq Railroad Reconstruction: A Success Story Every day, American men and women are working closely with Iraqis to build stability and peace; to construct roads, rails, and airports; and to forge ties of friendship, understanding, and respect that will last lifetimes.1 – Transportation Secretary Mary E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Edition, Dezember 2010
    EUROPEAN RAILWAY AGENCY INTEROPERABILITY UNIT DIRECTORY OF PASSENGER CODE LISTS FOR THE ERA TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS USED IN TAP TSI REFERENCE: ERA/TD/2009-14/INT DOCUMENT REFERENCE FILE TYPE: VERSION: 1.1.1 FINAL TAP TSI DATE: 08.03.2012 PAGE 1 OF 77 European Railway Agency ERA/TD/2009-14/INT: PASSENGER CODE LIST TO TAP TSI AMENDMENT RECORD Version Date Section Modification/description number 1.1 05.05.2011 All sections First release 1.1.1 27.09.2011 Code list New values added B.4.7009, code list B.5.308 ERA_TAP_Passenger_Code_List.doc Version 1.1.1 FINAL Page 2/77 European Railway Agency ERA/TD/2009-14/INT: PASSENGER CODE LIST TO TAP TSI Introduction The present document belongs to the set of Technical Documents described in Annex III „List of Technical Documents referenced in this TSI‟ of the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 454/2011. ERA_TAP_Passenger_Code_List.doc Version 1.1.1 FINAL Page 3/77 European Railway Agency ERA/TD/2009-14/INT: PASSENGER CODE LIST TO TAP TSI Code List ERA_TAP_Passenger_Code_List.doc Version 1.1.1 FINAL Page 4/77 European Railway Agency ERA/TD/2009-14/INT: PASSENGER CODE LIST TO TAP TSI Application : With effect from 08 March 2012. All actors of the European Union falling under the provisions of the TAP TSI. ERA_TAP_Passenger_Code_List.doc Version 1.1.1 FINAL Page 5/77 European Railway Agency ERA/TD/2009-14/INT: PASSENGER CODE LIST TO TAP TSI Contents AMENDMENT RECORD .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1 Msc Transportation Engineering Railroad Engineering College of Engineering University of Babylon
    Lecture 1 MSc Transportation Engineering Railroad Engineering College of Engineering University of Babylon Introduction to Railway Engineering • Railway Mode Of Transport • Early Beginnings • Railways in Iraq Lecturer : Prof. Dr. Hussein A. Ewadh 2017-2018 • Classification Schemes for Transportation Engineering Railways: Introduction • In this mode of transport, all vehicles use rail tracks to move from one point to another. • Vehicles consist of a long train of coaches attached to a locomotive. • The coaches and the locomotive have steel wheels which run on steel rail tracks. • The locomotive either uses diesel or use electricity as fuel (locomotives which run on coal are hardly used these days). • Since the rail tracks provide a dedicated right-of-way for the train services, these are good for high speed transit facilities. • Trains stop at pre-specified locations called stations. Important aspects related to the railway mode of transport • Safe and efficient operation and control of rail traffic. • Layout of rail tracks. • Structural design of the subgrade on which rail tracks run. • Planning of stations or terminals for railway vehicles. Early Beginnings • By the time steam locomotives came on the scene, in the early nineteenth century, wrought iron rails and later steel rails were developed which were strong enough to support these heavy axle loads without assistance from longitudinal timbers. • In essence the track itself, together with its supports, had and still has the basic function of safely transmitting the loads and forces imposed by passing trains to the ground beneath. • Various other civil engineering skills were also involved in the construction of early railways. These included the building of bridges, tunnels and gravity walls as well as extensive earthworks and drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Numeric Codes for Railway Companies
    List of numeric codes for railway companies (RICS Code) contact : [email protected] reference : http://www.uic.org/spip.php?article311 code short name full name country request date allocation date modified date beginof validity of end validity recent Freight Passenger Infra- structure Holding Integrated Other url 0001 0002 0003 0004 0005 01/02/2011 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV Netherlands 01/07/2004 01/07/2004 x http://www.stenaline.nl/ferry/ 0007 0008 0009 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy Finland 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.vr.fi/fi/ 0011 0012 TF Transfesa Spain 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 10/09/2013 x http://www.transfesa.com/ 0013 OSJD OSJD Poland 12/07/2000 12/07/2000 x http://osjd.org/ 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits France 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.cwl-services.com/ 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ 0016 RD RAILDATA Switzerland 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.raildata.coop/ 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA Belgium 06/05/2005 06/05/2005 01/12/2014 x http://www.thalys.com/ 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited United Kingdom 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://www.eurostar.com/ 0020 OAO RZD Joint Stock Company 'Russian Railways' Russia 30/06/1999 30/06/1999 x http://rzd.ru/ 0021 BC Belarusian Railways Belarus 11/09/2003 24/11/2004 x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi Ukraine 15/01/2004 15/01/2004 x http://uz.gov.ua/ 0023 CFM Calea Ferată din Moldova Moldova 30/06/1999 30/06/1999
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq – Iran Railway Project: Warnings of Destroying the Grand Faw Port
    Iraq – Iran Railway Project: Warnings of Destroying the Grand Faw port Ali Karim Edheeb Al-Baydar Center Publications for Studies and Planning Baidar Center for Studies and Planning About Center Baidar Center for Studies and Planning is a non-governmental and non-profit organization established in 2015 and registered with the NGO Directorate in the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers in Baghdad. The Center seeks to contribute to developing the state and its institutions, by proposing ideas and practical solutions to the main problems and challenges facing the state, including improving public sector management, policies and strategic planning, using reliable data and best practices. The Center engages the relevant authorities in the state with regular meetings to support this objective and utilises the support of international organizations dedicated to assisting Iraq’s developmemnt. The Center also seeks to support economic reforms, sustainable development and provide technical assistance to the public and private sectors. The Center also seeks to support development of the private sector to provide job opportunities for citizens through training and upskilling, in a way that reduces dependence on government institutions and contributes to supporting and diversfying the country’s economy. The Center aims to utilise the vast amount of potential in Iraq’s human resources by organizing programs to prepare and develop promising young people, including leaders capable of proposing, adopting and implementing visions and future plans that advance society and preserve its value system based on the commitment to a high moral standard and rejection of all types of corruption. 2 Iraq – Iran Railway Project: Warnings of Destroying the Grand Faw port Iraq – Iran Railway Project: Warnings of Destroying the Grand Faw port Ali Karim Edheeb The Grand Faw Port prepares Iraq to be a pathway for 16% of world trade Iraq doesn’t have railways with neighboring countries and relies on the land and seaports for trade exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations E
    UNITED NATIONS E Distr. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL LIMITED E/ESCWA/GRID/2005/4 COUNCIL 25 July 2005 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia REPORT EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON THE INTERREGIONAL TRANSPORT LINKAGES BETWEEN ESCWA, ECE AND ESCAP UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT PROJECT ON CAPACITY BUILDING THROUGH COOPERATION IN DEVELOPING LAND AND LAND-SEA INTERREGIONAL TRANSPORT LINKAGES (2002-2006) AMMAN, 30 MAY - 1 JUNE 2005 Summary This Expert Group Meeting was aimed at discussing the proposed transport linkages between the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) and two other regional commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) and the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). Additionally, the Meeting addressed the topic of current border crossing formalities and explored ways to improve them; and investigated the proposed methodologies for conducting economic feasibility studies in order to determine the most viable routes that will be part of the final, adopted linkages. Specifically, discussions focused on the following: (a) national reports by concerned countries of the three regions, which presented concepts of the transport routes that will form part of the connecting linkages; (b) a description of the current border crossing formalities; (c) the proposed methodology for economic feasibility studies; and (d) the steps that will be taken in due course within the framework of the United Nations Development Account Project and in line with its requirements. Agreements were reached with regard to land and land-sea linkages; and a list of steps to be undertaken by the three regional commissions was approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Access Over $352 Billion in Railway Projects
    IN PARTNERSHIP WITH SUPPORTING GOVERNMENT PARTNERS Under the honorary patronage of His Highness Sheikh Mansour Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Presidential Affairs H.E. Dr. Abdulla Belhaif Al Nuaimi, Minister of Public Works and Chairman of the Federal Transport Authority - Land & Maritime is delighted to invite you to attend Middle East Rail 2016 10th Annual conference and exhibition 8 – 9 March 2016 Dubai International Convention and Exhibition Centre, UAE H.E. Dr. Abdulla Belhaif Al Nuaimi H.E. Mohammed bin Khalid bin Henrik Hololei Philippe Citroën Minister of Public Works and Chairman Mohammed al-Suwaiket Director General Director General Federal Transport Authority - Land & Maritime General President Mobility and Transport UNIFE UAE Saudi Railways Organization European Commission Europe Saudi Arabia Europe Alwalid Alekrish Faris Saif Al Mazrouei John Lesniewski Bruce McCuaig Director of Construction Development Projects & CEO Chief Commercial Officer President & CEO Project Director of the Riyadh Metro Etihad Rail Oman Rail Metrolinx Arriyadh Development Authority UAE Oman Canada Saudi Arabia ACCESS OVER $352 BILLION IN RAILWAY PROJECTS Excellent opportunity for industrial players to network, An excellent and very successful event familiarise themselves with the latest trends, Mamdouh M. Tarabishi, Public Transport Program CEO, Al Madinah Al Munawarah Development Authority technologies and leading companies in the sector Hamdi Mohammed Al-Marhubi, ICV Manager, Oman Rail Ditecfer lolo Collocated with Book
    [Show full text]
  • Current Outlook to the Middle East Railways May 2017
    1 Current Outlook to the Middle East Railways May 2017 In the Name of the Almighty 2 Current Outlook to the Middle East Railways May 2017 Information for the reader The present report offers an overview of rail transport in a number of countries in the Middle East (RAME members). It does not claim to be exhaustive. It is a compilation of information on Middle East Railways, networks and projects that was collected from various public sources and the related countries as well. The pursued objective was to describe the present situation in each country in a neutral way, without formulating any opinion or assessing the described rail transport systems. This document is the first version. Readers are invited to inform UIC M.E. Regional Office of any new development or changes in the information related to their network. We intend to update the report in order to make it reflect the rapid development that rail transport is experiencing in the Region. UIC M.E. Regional Office expresses thanks to all members who contributed to this report by providing information and data, and by lending us their support. May 2017 UIC Middle East Regional Office 3 Current Outlook to the Middle East Railways May 2017 CONTENTS Page Information for the Reader …………………………………………………………. 3 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………… 5 Afghanistan (ARA) ………………………………………………………………… 7 Iran (RAI) …………………………………………………………………………... 18 Iraq (IRR) …………………………………………………………………………... 27 Jordan (ARC, JHR) ………………………………………………………………… 37 Oman Rail ………………………………………………………………………….. 49 Qatar (QRC) ………………………………………………………………………... 57 Saudi Arabia (SRO) ………………………………………………………………... 67 Syria (CFS, SHR) …………………………………………………………………... 76 Turkey (TCDD) …………………………………………………………………….. 87 United Arab Emirates (FTA) ……………………………………………………….. 96 4 Current Outlook to the Middle East Railways May 2017 Introduction Transport today is of great importance for countries for their economic and social development.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Carbon Rail Transport Challenge Action Plan Provisional Copy
    TRANSPORT Low Carbon Rail Transport Challenge Action Plan Provisional copy Action Plan Low Carbon Rail Transport Challenge UIC, the International Railway Association (240 members worldwide, see annex 2), is proposing a transport sector challenge in the framework of the green growth agenda and climate change perspective for 2030 and 2050. This challenge sets out ambitious but achievable targets for improvement of rail sector energy efficiency, reductions in green house gas (GHG) emissions and a more sustainable balance between transport modes. Transport is a key sector of the green economy. Large increases in the demand for transport have been forecast for the coming years, particularly in developing countries. There is a consensus amongst transport research papers and studies (eg UNEP, OECD, IEA) indicating the problem of the “business as usual” pattern and highlighting the need for a more sustainable direction, in particular shifting activity away from high-carbon modes (eg road and air) through medium-long term investments in rail and public transport (modal shift). More sustainable transport systems are required if we want to reach green growth: an acceptable level of GHG reductions (IEA 2012), lower externalities (CE Delft/Fraunhofer ISI/INNFRAS 2011), creation of green jobs (UNEP/ILO 2011, less health costs (WHO 2006 and 2011) social inclusion and economical growth (UNEP,2011). Energy consumption and carbon intensity As a first step of the challenge, the world railway sector has set itself ambitious 2030 and 2050 targets for energy
    [Show full text]
  • List of Company Codes for Railway Companies
    List of company codes for railway companies (Company Code) contact: [email protected] reference:http://www.era.europa.eu Company Short Name Name Country Add Date Mod Date Start Validity End Validity Freight Passenger Infrastructure Other URL Code Company http://www.stenaline.nl/fe 0006 StL Holland Stena Line Holland BV Netherlands 15-11-11 23-08-19 01-07-04 x rry/ 0010 VR VR-Yhtymä Oy Finland 15-11-11 27-05-16 30-06-99 x x x http://www.vr.fi/ http://www.transfesa.com 0012 TRFSA Transfesa Spain 15-11-11 11-10-16 30-06-99 x / 0013 OSJD OSJD Poland 15-11-11 29-10-13 12-07-00 x http://osjd.org/ http://www.cwl- 0014 CWL Compagnie des Wagons-Lits France 15-11-11 29-10-13 01-06-99 x services.com/ United Kingdom of Great Britain 0015 RMF Rail Manche Finance 15-11-11 25-05-15 01-06-99 x http://www.rmf.co.uk/ and Northern Ireland 0016 RD RAILDATA Switzerland 15-11-11 17-11-17 30-06-99 x http://www.raildata.coop/ United Kingdom of Great Britain 0017 ENS European Night Services Ltd 15-11-11 25-05-15 01-06-99 x and Northern Ireland 0018 THI Factory THI Factory SA Belgium 15-11-11 29-10-14 06-05-05 x http://www.thalys.com/ United Kingdom of Great Britain 0019 Eurostar I Eurostar International Limited 15-11-11 29-10-13 01-06-99 x http://www.eurostar.com/ and Northern Ireland Joint Stock Company 'Russian 0020 OAO RZD Russian Federation 15-11-11 25-05-15 30-06-99 x x x http://rzd.ru/ Railways' 0021 BC Belarusian Railways Belarus 15-11-11 29-10-13 24-11-04 x x x http://www.rw.by/ 0022 UZ Ukrainski Zaliznytsi Ukraine 15-11-11 15-01-04 x x x http://uz.gov.ua/
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Should Stop Funding Zionist Regime
    MIDDLE EAST December 2, 2018 7 the United Arab Emirates had ignored Iran... OPEC quotas, which Saddam claimed Republican Senator: (Continued From Page One) cost his nation $14 billion. Saddam also accused Kuwait of stealing $2.4 billion on Wednesday told top navy com- by pumping crude from a disputed oil manders that the Iranian armed forces field and demanded that Kuwait write U.S. Should Stop Funding had to develop their capabilities to deter off an estimated $15 billion of debt that any potential aggressor. Iraq had accumulated during its 1980s Ayatollah Khamenei hailed the navy’s war with Iran. achievements, including its launch of A World War II fighter pilot shot Zionist Regime the Sahand destroyer and Fateh and Qa- down fighting against the Japanese, dir submarines, saying it showed Iran Bush came to view Saddam a threat if is capable of developing world-class WASHINGTON (Dispatches) – said in an statement. he continued into Saudi Arabia. Bush modern technologies. deployed troops to the region and began Top Republican Senator Rand Paul The legislation gives Tel Aviv $38 The Leader said Iran does not seek a bombing runs. has voiced his strong opposition to billion in the framework of a mili- war with any other country, but it needs On Feb. 24, 1991, U.S. troops and the “forever” funding of the Zionist tary aid package over 10 years and to expand its defense capabilities. their allies stormed into Kuwait. It regime by the U.S. was negotiated in the final days of On Saturday, Iran’s Army chief Ma- ended 100 hours later.
    [Show full text]