DOCSLIB.ORG

University Micrcxilms International 300 N

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University Micrcxilms International 300 N INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of cither blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. University Micrcxilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 8426411 Hunter, Susan AN INQUIRY INTO POLICY CONFLICT: THE ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY DISPUTES The Ohio State University Ph.D. 1984 University Microfilms International300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Copyright 1984 by Hunter, Susan All Rights Reserved PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages_______ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print______ 3. Photographs with dark background______ 4. Illustrations are poor copy_______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy____ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page_______ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages_______ 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound cop y with print lost in spine_______ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print_______ 11. Page(s) 125 lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s)______________ seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered______________ . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages_______ 15. Other______________________________________________________________________________ University Microfilms International AN INQUIRY INTO POLICY CONFLICT: THE ONTOLOGICAL BASIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY DISPUTES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Susan Hunter, B.A., M.A. The Ohio State University 1984 Reading Committee: Approved By: Dr. Stuart J. Thorson Dr. Kristi Anderson Dr. John Dryzek Dr. James Farr Adfvisor Department of Political Science Copyright By Susan Hunter 1984 To George F. Hunter ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The years I have spent in pursuit of this degree have been long and often difficult— not just for me, but for my family as well. They have not always understood my edginess and bouts of extreme frustration, but they have always been there for me. I am grateful for their support and understanding. I wish to express my gratitude also to Dr. Stuart J. Thorson who has been my adviser almost from day one. He has encouraged, advised and fought for me every step of the way. His confidence in me kept me going when I would have stopped. I wish to thank Dr. Donald Sylvan who has been an adviser and friend for the entire four years of my graduate work. Special thanks go also to my reading Committee. Dr. Kristi Andersen has provided a great deal of help on editing, but has always provided a work environment in the Polimetrics Laboratory which was conducive to writing, thinking, and learning. Dr. John Dryzek first introduced me to environmental policy and to the normative issues in policy analysis. For that, as well as for his advice, objective and careful reading of every chapter, and his friendship go my thanks. Dr. James Farr has provided such detailed comments on every chapter that the pages have often "run red" with ink, but the comments have added a great deal to the quality of this work. My thanks go to Dr. Farr for the long discussions on political theory which have helped.to form my own views, as well as for his devotion to the task of reading this dissertation. The entire staff of the Polimetrics Laboratory deserve very special thanks. I have learned more here about survey research than could be learned in a classroom, and have been able to work with the best staff at Ohio State University while doing so. Nora Groves has "lightened" the load when I needed time, and has been a friend as well. Elizabeth Cook, my companion in computations, has provided a few sentences for the dissertation as well as companionship for lunches, movies, and other essential activities. Mark Teare, my closest friend, taught me to use the computer systems, and spent many hours debating with me the philo­ sophical questions which are the core of this research. Jim Ludwig has made it possible for me to write and produce this dissertation with relative ease. Without Jim's assistance, I would still be typing. Thanks also to Monika, Jeff, Molly, Maria, and Sean who have taken messages, helped typed sections of this work, drawn flow charts, and helped to make Polimetrics and unusually pleasant place to work. My four years at Ohio STate University have been made easier by the support provided by the staff of the Political Science Department. I wish to thank Emily Fogel, Sandy Wood, and especially Dick Stoddard for all the little things they did to "ease" the way. iv VITA April 13, 1947........... ...... Born - Flint Michigan 1970............................ B.A., Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 1980............................ M.A., Central Michigan University Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 1980-1981....................... University Fellow, The Ohio State University 1982-1984....................... Graduate Research Associate, Polimetrics Laboratory, The Ohio State University 1983............................ M.A., The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS "Community, Crime, and Rationality" (with Stuart J. Thorson), Pittsburgh Symposium on Modeling and Simulation. Pittsburgh. April, 1982. "The International Whaling Commission as a Global Actor", International Studies Association Conference in St. Louis, November, 1982. "Environmental Mediation: Can It Work for International Problems?" (with John Dryzek), International Studies Association Conference in Atlanta, Georgia, March 1984. v FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Policy Policy Evaluation. Professors John Dryzek and Donald Sylvan. Methods and Techniques. Professors Don Sylvan, John Dryzek, and Stuart Thorson. Values on Policy Analysis. Professors Stuart Thorson and James Farr. Environmental Policy. Professor John Dryzek. Minor Field: Theory Critique of Methods. Profesor James Farr. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENT..................................... iii VITA......................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................... lx LIST OF FIGURES.............................................. x CHAPTER 1. ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT................................ 1 1.1 The Problem................... 1 1.2 Rationality...................................... 8 1.2.1 Rationality of Beliefs.................... 10 1.2.2 Ontologies................................. 13 1.3 Outline of Dissertation.......................... 16 2. RATIONALITY AND ACTION................................ 20 3. RATIONALITY AND BELIEF................................ 35 4. HISTORICAL DISTINCTIONS............... 47 4.1 Oneness.......................................... 51 4.2 Apartness........................................ 56 4.2.1 By Spirit.................................. 57 4.2.2 By Reason.................................. 61 4.3 Conceptual Differences........................... 64 5. ONTOLOGY, WHAT?....................................... 66 5.1 Ideological Answers to Environmental Problems.... 67 5.2 Ontological Distinctions......................... 74 5.3 Conclusion....................................... 85 vii 6. RESEARCH DESIGN 87 6.1 Selection of Q Sort Respondents................. 93 6.2 Selection of Stimuli............................ 95 6.3 Constructing Ideal Types........................ 97 6.4 Pattern Matchings.............................. 98 7. THE REALITY OF ONTOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES................ 100 7.1 Type 1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View, Nuclear Power Plants Provide a Hope Which Coal Plants Cannot
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY: THE CASE OF PHOTOVOLTAICS Submitted to fulfill the requirements for candidacy as an Honors student in the Environmental Studies Program by Abram Walden Kaplan April, 1985 Oberlin College Please do not quote or distribute without the express permission of the author ----and the Environmental--· . --- Studies -- Program,----- Oberlin--- College.--- - Acknowledgements This proJect has been tremendously challenging and satisfying. It has given me the opportunity to link together my studies in many-- different disciplines, and to show their relevance to one another certainly a crucial facet of Environmental Studies. Four people in particular have invested considerable effort in seeing me through the research and writing process, and I cannot express enough my appreciation for their advice: Gil Heilaender and Larry Buell, my Honors advisors, have given me carefully prescribed doses of constructive feedback and thoughtful criticism. Thia proJect never ran into anything one might call a crisis, and my advisors can take much of the credit for preventing that. The two other maJor influences have been my parents, who have been incredibly patient and encouraging in seeing through the development of some of the themes in this thesis. Harlan Wilson, one of my Honors advisors for the first half of the proJect (until he left for a semester in London) was also very helpful in narrowing my focus and forcing me to think about what it was that I was attempting to do. Michael Kraft, Lucy Jarosz, Bob Tufts, Bob Hilborn, David Orr, Jay HacDaniel, George Lankford, and George Foy read all or part of my thesis in various stages, and offered excellent advice in clarifying and refining my writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Discourse
    Toxic Discourse The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Buell, Lawrence. 1998. Toxic Discourse. Critical Inquiry 24(3): 639-665. Published Version http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/448889 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2637816 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Toxic Discourse Lawrence Buell The fear of a poisoned world is being increasingly pressed, debated, de- bunked, and reiterated from many disciplinary vantage points: medicine, political science, history, sociology, economics, and ethics among others. Seldom however is toxicity discussed as a discourse. This essay aims to define the forms, origins, uses, and critical implications of toxic rhetoric, conceiving it as an interlocked set of topoi whose force derives partly from the exigencies of an anxiously industrializing culture, partly from deeper- rooted Western attitudes. In order to make this analysis pointed and manageable, and not to outrun the limits of my knowledge, I shall focus on the United States, although many of my points apply to Anglophone settler cultures worldwide, if not also to other regions (and few remain untouched) influenced by Western environmental institutions. As we shall see, toxic discourse challenges traditional understandings of what counts as an environmentalist movement or ethos. It calls for a new history of U.S. environmentalism that would place the wilderness preservationist John Muir and the urban social reformer Jane Addams in the same narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Brass-Tacks Ecology
    Trumpeter (1997) ISSN: 0832-6193 Brass-Tacks Ecology Moti Nissani Wayne State University Brass-Tacks Ecology 2 MOTI NISSANI is with the Interdisciplinary Studies Program at Wayne State University in Detroit Michigan. He has published two books and numerous articles. It is not merely a question of water supply and drains now, you know. No - it is the whole of our social life that we have got to purify and disinfect. Henrik Ibsen1 When solutions to the problems of human ecology are considered, all roads seem to lead to the political arena. Paul Ehrlich et al.2 [Environmentalists] should lobby as hard for campaign reform as they do for environmental issues. Since the movement will never be able to match industry's war chests, the only way to level the playing field is . through campaign finance reform. Randy Hayes3 Between 1970 and 1990, the United States passed laws, created agencies, and spent one trillion dollars in an ostensible effort to improve environmental quality. Yet, despite some notable gains (e.g., less lead in children's brains), and despite the strenuous efforts of grass-roots and national organizations, "the massive national effort to restore the quality of the environment has failed."4 Among the many reasons for this failure, two need to be touched upon here. First, the great majority of environmental thinkers ignore concrete political re- alities. Instead, they are caught up in debates about the significance of one or another proximate cause of the environmental crisis (choice of production technologies and materials, overpopulation, and affluence), or of one or another alleged ultimate cause (philosophical beliefs and practices; biological heritage; our tendency to dominate and exploit the poor, racial minorities, and wom- en).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword Chapter 1. Failing Governance, Unsustainable Planet
    Notes Foreword 1. James Madison, “The Federalist No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments,” Independent Journal, 6 February 1788. 2. Nicholas Stern, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. xviii. 3. Nicholas Berggruen and Nathan Gardels, Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2012); David Runciman, The Confidence Trap (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013), pp. 318–20. 4. John Platt, “What We Must Do,” Science, 28 November 1969, pp. 115–21. 5. Lisa-ann Gershwin, Stung! On Jellyfish Blooms and the Future of the Ocean (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013); Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of IPCC Working Group I (Cambridge, U.K.: 2013). 6. Adam Hochschild, Bury the Chains (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2005). 7. U. Thara Srinivasan et al., “The Debt of Nations and Distribution of Ecological Impacts from Human Activi- ties,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 5 (2008), pp. 1,768–73. 8. John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy (London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1848/1940), pp. 746–51. 9. Kenneth E. Boulding, “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth,” presented at the Sixth Resources for the Future Forum on Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Washington, DC, 8 March 1966. 10. White House Council on Environmental Quality, “Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change,” Executive Order (Washington, DC: November 2013). 11. Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (Boston: Beacon, 1967/1944), p.
    [Show full text]
  • 37 the Sustainability Debate: Déjà Vu All Over Again? Ronnie D
    37 The sustainability debate: déjà vu all over again? Ronnie D. Lipschutz1 What can be said about sustainability that has not been said before? Is the term defined today with any more precision and specificity than in the past? Does “sustainability” denote a process or a goal, and has progress toward it been achieved? After 30 years and an extended period of eclipse, should we pay attention to sustainability? To be sure, sustainability has returned with a vengeance. It has become an all-encompassing watchword for environmental policy and practice, for production and consumption, for urban planning and rural extraction. It is pursued by universities, think-tanks, communities, corporations, and governments around the world. It is the silver bullet that will save the world … or will it? In the background to the term can be observed many of the terminological struggles and controversies of the past 50 years, including “limits to growth,” “the population explosion,” and “environmental security.”2 Whatever it is or does, sustainability continues to confuse and confound, being applied in contexts as diverse and distinct as military strategy, financial stability, and the world’s environmental future. My goal here, therefore, is to assay and analyze the “sustainability debate,” drawing not only on contemporary usages and practices but also extending the investigation into the realms of science and engineering. Whether sustainability represents something new in contemporary use and practice, or is nothing more than “déjà vu all over again,” might become clearer by the end of this chapter. I begin with a brief discussion of the history of sustainability as a concept, one whose general sense can be traced back as far as the mid-nineteenth century,3 but which did not enter the more general environmental lexicon until the 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Political Ecology : a Moral Conception of Ecological Obligation
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1985 In defense of political ecology : a moral conception of ecological obligation. Stanley J. Weinstein University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Weinstein, Stanley J., "In defense of political ecology : a moral conception of ecological obligation." (1985). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1863. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1863 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IN DEFENSE OF POLITICAL ECOLOGY: A MORAL CONCEPTION OF ECOLOGICAL OBLIGATION A Dissertation Presented By STANLEY JEROME WEINSTEIN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 1985 Department of Political Science Stanley Jerome Weinstein All Rights Reserved IN DEFENSE OF POLITICAL ECOLOGY: A MORAL CONCEPTION OF ECOLOGICAL OBLIGATION A Dissertation Presented By STANLEY J. WEINSTEIN Approved as to style and content by; Jerome B. King, Chairperson i /' ^egm. EI shta^rnr Member Arthur Westing, Member Glen Gordon, Chairman Department of Political Science iii To the memory of George Lichtheim, fellow traveller. The prophetic individual does not possess the future, he merely intimates it. He cannot assert it, yet he is lost to the actuality to which he belongs. S<6ren Kierkegaard The Concept of Irony iv .
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    WATER FROM THE NORTH NATURE, FRESHWATER, AND THE NORTH AMERICAN WATER AND POWER ALLIANCE By Andrew W. Reeves A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Department of Geography University of Toronto © Copyright by Andrew W. Reeves 2009 Library and Archives Bibliothèque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-59557-2 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-59557-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Biodiversity: an International Environmental Policy Perspective
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 17 Number 2 Article 2 Spring 1992 Loss of Biodiversity: An International Environmental Policy Perspective Tracy Dobson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Tracy Dobson, Loss of Biodiversity: An International Environmental Policy Perspective, 17 N.C. J. INT'L L. 277 (1992). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol17/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Loss of Biodiversity: An International Environmental Policy Perspective Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This article is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol17/ iss2/2 Loss of Biodiversity: An International Environmental Policy Perspective Tracy Dobson* I. Introduction Once upon a time, humans, animals, plants, and the wind, sun and stars were all able to talk together. God changed this, but we are still part of a wider community. We have the right to live, as do the plants, animals, wind, sun and stars; but we have no right tojeopard- 1 ize their existence. Spokesperson, San people of Botswana. We all share this tormented earth, and harm done in any part of it will exact a heavy toll from all of us. President Robert Mugabe, 2 Zimbabwe. This we know. The earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth.
    [Show full text]
  • POL 373: Global Ecological Politics (Rev. 2007-03-19) Prof. Alex Montgomery [email protected] (503) 517-7395
    POL 373: Global Ecological Politics (rev. 2007-03-19) Prof. Alex Montgomery [email protected] (503) 517-7395 Class Office Tu 6:10-9:00 PM TuTh 4:00-5:30 PM or by appointment LIB 203 Eliot 204B https://moodle.reed.edu/course/view.php?id=32 http://www.reed.edu/∼ahm Course Description and Goals Full course for one semester. What conceptual framework can we use to analyze ecological issues in today’s world? Do we as human beings have responsibility toward the environment? What impact does globalization have on the environment? How do political and economic development of societies influence and how are they influenced by the changes in the environment? How do ecological issues affect conflict and cooperation between and within states? In an attempt to shed light on these questions, the course analyzes structures, agents, and processes affecting global ecological politics in the first half. The second half focuses on examining contemporary issue areas including food, fish, forests, biodiversity; water, pollution, chemicals, and waste; energy, climate change, and ozone depletion; and potential future problems. Prerequisite: one upper division course in social sciences or history or consent of the instructor. Conference. Students will learn to perform basic research and analysis through writing and thinking about events in world politics from multiple different perspectives. Readings are drawn from historic and contemporary scholars of international relations, cover a wide variety of issues, and are grouped together in conflicting pairs where possible. Assignments are a mixture of analysis, research, and experiential learning. Requirements Class Participation Students will have the opportunity participate in the class both during and outside of classroom hours.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Growth Is Not a Liberal Agenda: Relocalization and the Limits to Low Energy Cosmopolitanism
    De-Growth Is Not a Liberal Agenda: Relocalization and the limits to low energy cosmopolitanism. Abstract: Degrowth is identified as a prospective turning point in human development as significant as the domestication of fire or the process of agrarianisation. The Transition movement is identified as the most important attempt to develop a prefigurative, local politics of degrowth. Explicating the links between capitalist modernisation, metabolic throughput and psychological individuation, Transition embraces 'limits' but downplays the implications of scarcity for open, liberal societies, and for inter-personal and inter-group violence. William Ophuls' trilogy on the politics of scarcity confronts precisely these issues, but it depends on an unconvincing sociology of individuation as a central process in modernity. A framework is advanced through which to explore the tensions, trade-offs and possibilities for a socially liberal, culturally cosmopolitan and science-based civilization under conditions of degrowth and metabolic contraction. “… in Africa I was a member of a family – a sort of family that the people of your culture haven’t known for thousands of years. If gorillas were capable of such an expression they would tell you that their family is like a hand of which they are fingers. They are fully aware of being a family but very little aware of being individuals….(the Gorillas in the zoo …were) no family. Five severed fingers do not make a hand” (The gorilla Ishmael ruminating on what Norbert Elias would refer to as the changing I/We balance in family life, in Daniel Quinn’s novel Ishmael, 1995: 12) 1. Introduction: The problem of growth and de-growth If we accept the thermodynamic basis of both economy and ecology, then the growth and expansion of human activities and artefacts on the Earth will come to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of the Law for Energy and the Environment, Te
    The Future of the Law for Energy and the Environment EARL FINBAR MURPHY* I. WHY WE WORRY ABOUT THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL FUTURE Now Every enterprise ought to be known for its purposes. Anyone, therefore, writing about the future of environmental and energy law needs to start with definitions. Otherwise, any expression on the subject will lack precision and be incapable of sustaining critical scrutiny. First, what is the future? Is it our own tomorrow or is it Buck Rogers' twenty-fifth century? For some time now, writing about the future has been affected with millenarian bias. The year 2000 has acquired a terminal character. It has become the goal to be reached, as if it represented a safe harbor to time travellers. The year 2000 has such a reality only in the social consequences of believing it to possess finality. Far more significant, of course, is that it will be only one more in the flux of years. It is hard to conceive of the future in any specific way in terms of more than decades. Even when speculative philosophers such as Saint Thomas More have sought a further view, they have carried into that intended distance the attributes of their own time. Utopia remains firmly a part of Tudor England and will forever be an idealist's impression of what the sixteenth century might have been in northwestern Europe. Every generation sees the future in its own present terms. Insofar as the energy future is concerned for currently high-energy demandant practices, there is likely to be a glut of energy sources until the mid-1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict, Conciliation, and the Future of the Planet
    Conflict, Conciliation, and the Future of the Planet Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Shahar, Dan Coby Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 21:32:31 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625463 CONFLICT, CONCILIATION, AND THE FUTURE OF THE PLANET by Dan C. Shahar _______________________ Copyright © Dan C. Shahar 2017 A DissErtation SubmittEd to thE Faculty of thE DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY In Partial FulfillmEnt of thE RequirEmEnts For the DEgrEE of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In thE Graduate CollEgE THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2017 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Dan C. Shahar, titled Conflict, Conciliation, and the Future of the Planet, and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ____________________________________________________ Date: May 26th, 2017 David Schmidtz ____________________________________________________ Date: May 26th, 2017 Gerald Gaus ____________________________________________________ Date: May 26th, 2017 Steven Wall Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission
    [Show full text]