Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assessment Report Development Cooperation of the Czech Republic in the Water Supply and Sanitation Sector in Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples Region in Ethiopia Assessment report 30 September 2011 This report contains the views of the consultant. Such views do not necessarily correspond to the views of the Czech Development Agency, the Ethiopian Government or any other party. All recommendations are subject to approval by relevant parties. Assessment of CZDA in the WASH Sector in SNNPR, Ethiopia 2 Content 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 Context of the assessment.......................................................................................................................... 8 1.1.1 Present state of affairs in water and sanitation .................................................................................. 8 1.1.2 Current situation in SNNPR .............................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Main Conclusions and Recommendations................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Assessment questions .............................................................................................................................. 10 2 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Purpose of the Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 14 2.2.1 Secondary data ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.2 Primary data ..................................................................................................................................... 14 3 PRESENT STATE OF AFFAIRS IN WATER AND SANITATION ......................................................... 17 3.1 Policy and strategic framework ............................................................................................................... 17 3.1.1 National programs and plans ........................................................................................................... 17 3.1.2 The water and sanitation sector ....................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Legal and regulatory framework ............................................................................................................. 19 3.3 WASH coordination ................................................................................................................................ 21 3.3.1 MOU on the Integrated Implementation of WASH ........................................................................ 21 3.3.2 Multi-Stakeholder Forum (MSF) ..................................................................................................... 22 3.3.3 DAG Water Technical Working Group (TWG) .............................................................................. 22 3.3.4 Water and Sanitation Forum (WSF) ................................................................................................ 23 3.3.5 Research-inspired Policy and Practice Learning in Ethiopia and the Nile region ........................... 24 3.4 Plans, programs and strategies for enhancing WASH implementation ................................................... 24 3.4.1 Planning, implementation and monitoring ...................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Wash Inventory................................................................................................................................ 25 3.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 26 4 CURRENT SITUATION IN SNNPR ........................................................................................................... 27 4.1 Background information on SNNPR and Sidama ................................................................................... 27 4.2 Major stakeholders .................................................................................................................................. 29 4.2.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2.2 Governmental and semi-governmental institutions ......................................................................... 30 4.2.3 WASH coordination ........................................................................................................................ 32 4.3 Drinking water coverage ......................................................................................................................... 34 5 ASSESSMENT QUESTIONS: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................. 37 5.1 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 5.1.1 Consensus on proposed priority Woredas ....................................................................................... 37 5.1.2 Narrowing the scope ........................................................................................................................ 37 5.1.3 Consensus on scope and phased approach ....................................................................................... 39 5.1.4 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 40 5.2 Relevance of potential DC CZ interventions in proposed Woredas ........................................................ 40 5.2.1 Access to safe drinking water in Loka Abaya and Aleta Chuko ..................................................... 40 5.2.2 Topography of Aleta Wondo and Loka Abaya ................................................................................ 41 5.2.3 Interventions by other donors .......................................................................................................... 41 5.3 Feasibility ................................................................................................................................................ 42 5.3.1 Technical feasibility ........................................................................................................................ 42 5.3.2 Socio-economic feasibility .............................................................................................................. 48 5.4 Potential for cooperation with partners in WASH in Sidama .................................................................. 50 5.5 Recommended engineering solutions (hard components) ....................................................................... 52 5.5.1 Loka Abaya ..................................................................................................................................... 53 5.5.2 Aleta Chuko ..................................................................................................................................... 54 5.5.3 Implementation steps for engineering solutions .............................................................................. 54 5.5.4 Construction works .......................................................................................................................... 54 Assessment of CZDA in the WASH Sector in SNNPR, Ethiopia 3 5.5.5 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................................... 55 5.6 Recommended non-engineering solutions (soft components) ................................................................. 56 5.6.1 Rationale behind including non-engineering solutions ................................................................... 56 5.6.2 Community development for improved sustainability .................................................................... 56 5.6.3 Sanitation and hygiene promotion for improved effectiveness ....................................................... 57 5.6.4 Recommendations and key assumptions ......................................................................................... 57 5.7 Form of water resource management ...................................................................................................... 58 5.7.1 What does water resource management involve.............................................................................. 58 5.7.2 Who is responsible? ......................................................................................................................... 58 5.7.3 Training and capacity building ........................................................................................................ 58 5.7.4 Audits and inspections ..................................................................................................................... 59 5.7.5 Current situation in the four visited Woredas .................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY Food Security Update
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook Update September 2013 Crops are at their normal developmental stages in most parts of the country Figure 1. Projected food security outcomes, KEY MESSAGES September 2013 • Following the mostly normal performance of the June to September Kiremt rains, most crops are at their normally expected developmental stage. A near normal Meher harvest is expected in most parts of the country. However, in places where Kiremt rains started late and in areas where some weather-related hazards occurred, some below normal production is anticipated. • Market prices of most staple cereals remain stable at their elevated levels compared to previous months, but prices are likely to fall slightly starting in October due to the expected near normal Meher production in most parts of the country, which, in turn, will also improve household-level food access from October to December. Source: FEWS NET Ethiopia • Overall, current nutritional status compared to June/July has slightly improved or remains the same with exceptions in Figure 2. Projected food security outcomes, some areas in northeastern Tigray and Amhara Regions as October to December 2013 well as some parts of East Hararghe Zone in Oromia Region. In these areas, there are indications of deteriorating nutritional status due to the well below average Belg harvest and the current absence of a green harvest from long-cycle Meher crops. CURRENT SITUATION • Cumulative Kiremt rainfall from June to September was normal to above normal and evenly distributed in all of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples’ Region (SNNPR), in most parts of Amhara, in central and western parts Oromia, and in the central parts of Tigray.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition, Relative Abundance and Habitat Association of Birds in Arbegona, Garemba Forest, Southern Ethiopia
    Advances in Life Science and Technology www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-7181 (Paper) ISSN 2225-062X (Online) DOI: 10.7176/ALST Vol.75, 2019 Species Composition, Relative Abundance and Habitat Association of Birds in Arbegona, Garemba Forest, Southern Ethiopia Ziyad Jemal 1 Mustefa Sultan 2 1.Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, Ethiopia 2.Department of Forestry, College of Agriculture and Environmental Science, Arsi University, Asella, Ethiopia Abstract The present study was carried out in Arbegona Garemba forest from August June 2017 to February 2018 during wet and dry seasons. The study area was stratified based on vegetation composition. Accordingly, Modified habitat, Alpine bamboo forest, and Sub-Afro alpine /Ericaceous belt/ were considered. A line transects count aided by binocular was employed to investigate avian species diversity, relative abundance and Habitat association. Thus10 transect lines of 0.75km lengths with a width of 0.15km or less wereused to cover 30% of the area. A total of 74 bird species consisting of 5 near endemics, 2 globally threatened and 3 Palearctic migrants were recorded.Average vegetation height was a good predictor for total bird abundance and bird species richness during dry season. Altitude accounted more in total species richness and bird species abundance during wet season. Though, slope was a good predictor for bird species abundance during dry season. It can be concluded that the patch of forest and its surrounding is an important bird area for migratory, endemic, and global threatened species. Therefore, it should be conservation priority area; hence, the study suggests that conservation together with ecotourism development is needed for its sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010
    ETHIOPIA - National Hot Spot Map 31 May 2010 R Legend Eritrea E Tigray R egion !ª D 450 ho uses burned do wn d ue to th e re ce nt International Boundary !ª !ª Ahferom Sudan Tahtay Erob fire incid ent in Keft a hum era woreda. I nhabitan ts Laelay Ahferom !ª Regional Boundary > Mereb Leke " !ª S are repo rted to be lef t out o f sh elter; UNI CEF !ª Adiyabo Adiyabo Gulomekeda W W W 7 Dalul E !Ò Laelay togethe r w ith the regiona l g ove rnm ent is Zonal Boundary North Western A Kafta Humera Maychew Eastern !ª sup portin g the victim s with provision o f wate r Measle Cas es Woreda Boundary Central and oth er imm ediate n eeds Measles co ntinues to b e re ported > Western Berahle with new four cases in Arada Zone 2 Lakes WBN BN Tsel emt !A !ª A! Sub-city,Ad dis Ababa ; and one Addi Arekay> W b Afa r Region N b Afdera Military Operation BeyedaB Ab Ala ! case in Ahfe rom woreda, Tig ray > > bb The re a re d isplaced pe ople from fo ur A Debark > > b o N W b B N Abergele Erebtoi B N W Southern keb eles of Mille and also five kebeles B N Janam ora Moegale Bidu Dabat Wag HiomraW B of Da llol woreda s (400 0 persons) a ff ected Hot Spot Areas AWD C ases N N N > N > B B W Sahl a B W > B N W Raya A zebo due to flo oding from Awash rive r an d ru n Since t he beg in nin g of th e year, Wegera B N No Data/No Humanitarian Concern > Ziquala Sekota B a total of 967 cases of AWD w ith East bb BN > Teru > off fro m Tigray highlands, respective ly.
    [Show full text]
  • October 27, 2005
    Minutes of the 43rd Technical Information Management Exchange (TIME) Forum Meeting October 27,2005, 10:00 hrs DPPC Conference Room Chairperson: Ato Wegayehu Belew Agenda • Food Aid Task Force, Ato Mesfin Sheferaw • Situation Report, Early Warning Department (DPPC) • Food Aid Pipeline Report, World Food Programme (WFP) • EFSRA Stock Status Report, Ato Wegayehu Belew • AOB Food Aid Task Force: Ato Mesfin Sheferaw I. September Allocation and Dispatch Status by DPPC Region Allocation Dispatch (%) Afar 4,453.2 100 Amhara 1,903.7 100 Gambella 731.1 80 Oromia 12,823.6 100 Harari No beneficiaries SNNP Utilization report not submitted Somali Utilization report not submitted Tigray 4,520.3 90 Total 24,431.9 Due to late allocation to Tigray and Gambella Regions, dispatch for the month of September has not been completed. Meeting participants stated that withholding food aid allocation because of lack of utilization reports would be tantamount to punishing the needy. Therefore it was suggested that giving technical support to the concerned Regions on preparing utilization reports can be a solution. However the Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Agency (DPPA), taking note of the suggestion, assured concerned that for hot spot areas food aid is distributed with or out without utilization report. II. September Allocation and Dispatch Status by NGOs Region Allocation Oromia 8,033.82 Somali 1,263.00 SNN 951.7 DireDawa 596.04 Amhara 328.41 Afar 364.5 Tigray 6,690.76 Total 18,228.23 • FHI/ORDA has completed dispatch (Grain and Oil) • SC/UK has not transported the allocation to Dahana and Ziquala woreda in Amhara Region because woreda officials did not submit the beneficiary figure, which has decreased significantly from the previous months.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 146.64 Kb
    Ethiopian Early Warning System Monthly Report :September 2005 29 SEPTEMBER 2005 AREAS OF PRIORITY ACTION HIGHLIGHTS Flood Interrupted Road Connection in Afar Grain and livestock Price Situation Price of grain showed significant Heavy flood of Awash River that occurred on September 2, 2005 in Dubti increase in July 2005 from that of Woreda of Afar broke a bridge connecting some Kebeles with other last year. Page 5 parts of the region. According to Regional reports, a total of 42,000 people were affected by the flood. In response, the Federal DPPC in collaboration Prevalence of Malnutrition Identified with the National Defence Force and the Regional Goverment have provided Preliminary findings of an the necessary emergency supplies to the affected population. The National assessment team deployed to Defence Force has also played an important role in trasporting emergency East Hararghe Zone and East supplies using helicopters. Shewa Zone of Oromiya Region indicate cases of malnutrition in Flood Caused Damage in Dugda Bora, East Shewa Fedis, Babile and Alemaya Woredas. Page 14 Awash and Meki rivers unusually broke their bank after mid-August and flooded four localities in Dugda Bora Woreda of East Shewa Zone affecting people and causing damage to crops, livestock and residentialm houses. Agricultural Activities and Crop Performances In response, several people were rescued by motor and manual boats; dry Meher crop performance in most ration was distributed by the Fedaral DPPC and the woreda administration; mid and highland areas is flood prevention works done around the broken bank of Meki River. reported good while in some lowland areas production could Malaria Outbreak Reported likely decrease.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Worm Infestation in SNNP and Oromia Regions As of 24 May
    Army worm infestation in SNNP and Oromia Regions As of 24 May, some 8,368 hectares of belg cropland was reportedly destroyed by army worms in Wolayita zone of SNNPR - an area that suffered from late onset of the 2013 belg rains and subsequent heavy rains that damaged belg crops. The damage caused by the army worms will further reduce the expected harvest this season. Similar incidents were also reported from Boricha, Bona Zuria, Dara, Dale, Hawassa Zuria and Loko Abaya woredas of Sidama zone; Loma and Mareka woredas of Dawro zone (SNNPR), as well as from drought prone areas of East and West Hararge zones of Oromia Region; and quickly spreading to neighbouring areas. In Boricha woreda, for example, more than 655 hectares of belg cropland was destroyed in the course of one week, this is indicative of the speed that damage is being caused. Immediate distribution of spraying containers and chemicals to the farmers is required to prevent further loss of belg crops. For more information, contact: [email protected] Health Update The number of meningitis cases has gradually declined since the outbreak was declared in January. To date, 1,371 cases were reported from 24 woredas in five zones of SNNP and Oromia Regions. The Government, with support from health partners, is conducting a reactive vaccination in the affected areas, with 1, 678,220 people vaccinated so far. Next week, the number of people vaccinated during the Addis Ababa City Administration meningitis vaccination campaign, conducted from 20 to 26 May, will be released. Meanwhile, the number of kebeles reporting cases of Yellow Fever in South Ari, Benatsemay and Selmago woredas of South Omo zone, SNNPR, increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Malaria by Sidama People of Boricha District, Sidama Zone, South Region of Ethiopia
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Volume 2016, Article ID 9690164, 9 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9690164 Research Article Survey of Medicinal Plants Used to Treat Malaria by Sidama People of Boricha District, Sidama Zone, South Region of Ethiopia Solomon Asnake,1 Tilahun Teklehaymanot,2 Ariaya Hymete,3 Berhanu Erko,2 and Mirutse Giday2 1 Medicine and Health Science College, Hawassa University, P.O. Box 1560, Hawassa, Ethiopia 2Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 3SchoolofPharmacy,AddisAbabaUniversity,P.O.Box1176,AddisAbaba,Ethiopia Correspondence should be addressed to Mirutse Giday; [email protected] Received 7 November 2015; Revised 10 January 2016; Accepted 26 January 2016 Academic Editor: Ulysses P. Albuquerque Copyright © 2016 Solomon Asnake et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In Ethiopia, malaria control has been complicated due to resistance of the parasite to the current drugs. Thus, new drugs are required against drug-resistant Plasmodium strains. Historically, many of the present antimalarial drugs were discovered from plants. This study was, therefore, conducted to document antimalarial plants utilized by Sidama people of Boricha District, Sidama Zone, South Region of Ethiopia. An ethnobotanical survey was carried out from September 2011 to February 2012. Data were collected through semistructured interview and field and market observations. Relative frequency of citation (RFC) was calculated and preference ranking exercises were conducted to estimate the importance of the reported medicinal plants in Boricha District.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 HS 000 ETH 013013 A4.Pdf (English)
    ETHIOPIA:Humanitarian Concern Areas Map (as of 04 February 2013) Eritrea > !ª !ª> Note: The following newly created woreda boundaries are not Tahtay !ª E available in the geo-database; hence not represented in this Nutrition Hotspot Priority Laelay Erob R R !ª Adiyabo Mereb Ahferom !ª Tahtay Gulomekeda !ª I E map regardless of their nutrition hot spot priority 1 & 2: Adiyabo Leke T D Adiyabo Adwa Saesie Dalul Priority one Asgede Tahtay R S Kafta Werei Tsaedaemba E E Priority 1: Dawa Sarar (Bale zone), Goro Dola (Guji zone), Abichu Tsimbila Maychew !ª A Humera Leke Hawzen Berahle A Niya( North Showa zone) and Burka Dintu (West Hararge Priority two > T I GR AY > Koneba Central Berahle zone) of Oromia region, Mekoy (Nuer zone) of Gambella Western Naeder Kola Ke>lete Awelallo Priority three Tselemti Adet Temben region, Kersadula and Raso (Afder zone), Ararso, Birkod, Tanqua > Enderta !ª Daror and Yo'ale (Degahabour zone), Kubi (Fik zone), Addi Tselemt Zone 2 No Priority given Arekay Abergele Southern Ab Ala Afdera Mersin (Korahe zone), Dhekasuftu and Mubarek (Liben Beyeda Saharti Erebti Debark Hintalo !ª zone), Hadigala (Shinille zone) and Daratole (Warder Abergele Samre > Megale Erebti Bidu Wejirat zone) of Somali region. Dabat Janamora > Bidu International Boundary Alaje Raya North Lay Sahla Azebo > Wegera Endamehoni > > Priority 2: Saba Boru (Guji zone) of Oromia region and Ber'ano Regional Boundary Gonder Armacho Ziquala > A FA R !ª East Sekota Raya Yalo Teru (Gode zone) and Tulu Guled (Jijiga zone) of Somali region. Ofla Kurri Belesa
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Updated Procurement Plan, M 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Public Disclosure Authorized Guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report: IPMS – Farm Radio Participatory Agricultural Radio
    Assessment Report: IPMS – Farm Radio Participatory Agricultural Radio Series’ in Ethiopia February, 2012 Evaluation report by: Eyob Mihretab (Development Consultant) Submitted To: IPMS / ILRI Submitted By: Farm Radio International Executive Summary In 2011, the Improving Productivity and Marketing Success (IPMS) project of the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) asked Farm Radio international to coordinate the planning and delivery of a series of radio programs related to two of the commodity value chains involved in IPMS: apiculture in the Tigray Region, and fruit tree production in Sidama. Farm Radio International accepted this invitation, and, after signing an agreement with ILRI-IPMS, proceeded with the development, implementation and evaluation of a new approach to agricultural radio: the Participatory Agricultural Radio Series – or PARS. The PARS was conceptualized as a weekly series of 6 episodes of 30-minute radio programs related to some aspect of the apiculture or fruit tree value chains. Planned with input from and the participation of intended beneficiaries, the PARS engages farmers as central players to design, develop and implement a series of radio programs around an agricultural practice they deem essential to their livelihoods and overall food security. It was anticipated that the PARS would be successful in raising the knowledge levels of communities reached by the programs, but that a 6-week series was probably inadequate to have a short-term measurable impact on the practices/behaviours of farmers. (FRI’s
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia COI Compilation
    BEREICH | EVENTL. ABTEILUNG | WWW.ROTESKREUZ.AT ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation Ethiopia: COI Compilation November 2019 This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared within a specified time frame on the basis of publicly available documents as well as information provided by experts. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications. © Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD An electronic version of this report is available on www.ecoi.net. Austrian Red Cross/ACCORD Wiedner Hauptstraße 32 A- 1040 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 58 900 – 582 E-Mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.redcross.at/accord This report was commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Background information ......................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Geographical information .................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Map of Ethiopia ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]